DOCSLIB.ORG

Aphasia Handbook by Alfredo Ardila

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aphasia Handbook by Alfredo Ardila AphasiaAphasia HandbookHandbook Alfredo Ardila Florida International University 2014 Aphasia Handbook 2 To my professor and friend Alexander R. Luria With inmense gratitude Alfredo Ardila Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders Florida International University Miami, Florida, USA [email protected]; [email protected] Aphasia Handbook 3 Content Preface .................................................................................................................... 9 I. BASIC CONSIDERATIONS 1. History of aphasia ............................................................................................ 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 11 Pre-classical Period (until 1861) ....................................................................... 11 Classical Period (1861-1945) ............................................................................. 14 Modern Period (until the 1970s) ......................................................................... 18 Contemporary Period (since the 1970s) ............................................................ 24 Summary ............................................................................................................ 26 Recommended readings .................................................................................... 26 References ......................................................................................................... 26 2. Aphasia etiologies .......................................................................................... 29 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 29 Vascular disorders ............................................................................................. 30 Types of CVA .............................................................................................. 34 Traumatic brain injury ........................................................................................ 35 Types of TBI ............................................................................................... 36 Speech and language characteristics ......................................................... 38 Neoplasms ......................................................................................................... 38 Infections ............................................................................................................ 40 Degenerative conditions .................................................................................... 41 Alzheimer’s disease .................................................................................... 41 Progressive aphasia .................................................................................... 43 Other degenerative conditions .................................................................... 44 Summary ............................................................................................................ 44 Recommended readings .................................................................................... 44 References ......................................................................................................... 45 3. Linguistic analysis of aphasia ........................................................................ 46 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 46 Levels of analysis of the language ..................................................................... 46 Phonetic ...................................................................................................... 47 Phonemic .................................................................................................... 48 Morphemic .................................................................................................. 49 Morphosyntactic .......................................................................................... 50 Semantic ..................................................................................................... 50 Aphasia Handbook 4 Pragmatic .................................................................................................... 52 Linguistic defects in aphasia .............................................................................. 52 Levels of the language impaired in different aphasias ................................ 52 Language deviations ................................................................................... 53 Repetition .................................................................................................... 55 Naming ........................................................................................................ 56 A linguistic interpretation of aphasias ................................................................ 56 Summary ............................................................................................................ 57 Recommended readings .................................................................................... 58 References ......................................................................................................... 58 II. CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS 4. The major aphasic syndromes: Wernicke’s aphasia and Broca’s aphasia 60 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 60 Wernicke;s aphasia ........................................................................................... 61 Broca’s aphasia ................................................................................................. 66 Summary ............................................................................................................ 71 Recommended readings .................................................................................... 72 References ......................................................................................................... 72 5. Other aphasic syndromes ............................................................................... 76 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 76 Conduction aphasia ........................................................................................... 76 Extrasylvian (transcortical) sensory aphasia ...................................................... 81 Extrasylvian (transcortical) motor aphasia (“dysexecutive aphasia’’) ................ 85 Mixed extrasylvian (transcortical) aphasia ......................................................... 87 Supplementary motor area (SMA) aphasia ....................................................... 89 Subcortical aphasia ............................................................................................ 92 Global aphasia ................................................................................................... 94 Summary ............................................................................................................ 95 Recommended readings .................................................................................... 96 References ......................................................................................................... 96 6. Alexia .............................................................................................................. 102 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 102 Classical alexia subtypes ................................................................................ 104 Alexia without agraphia ............................................................................. 104 Alexia with agraphia .................................................................................. 106 Frontal alexia ............................................................................................. 106 Spatial alexia ............................................................................................. 106 Psycholinguistic models of alexias (dyslexias) ................................................ 109 Phonological alexia ................................................................................... 109 Surface alexia ........................................................................................... 110 Aphasia Handbook 5 Deep alexia ............................................................................................... 110 Attentional alexia ....................................................................................... 111 Other alexias ................................................................................................... 112 Aphasic alexia ........................................................................................... 112 Hemialexia ................................................................................................ 113 Alexia in phonological and logographic writing systems ........................... 113 Some special forms of alexia .................................................................... 114 Summary ......................................................................................................... 114 Recommended readings .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perturbation of the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus Triggers Adaptive Plasticity in the Right Homologous Area During Speech Production
    Perturbation of the left inferior frontal gyrus triggers adaptive plasticity in the right homologous area during speech production Gesa Hartwigsena,b,c,1, Dorothee Saurb, Cathy J. Priced, Stephan Ulmere,f, Annette Baumgaertnera,g, and Hartwig R. Siebnera,h aDepartment of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; bLanguage and Aphasia Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; cDepartment of Psychology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany; dWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; eDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Radiological Institute, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland; fInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany; gDepartment of Speech and Language Pathology, Hochschule Fresenius Hamburg, 20148 Hamburg, Germany; and hDanish Research Center for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark Edited by Michael S. Gazzaniga, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, and approved August 28, 2013 (received for review May 29, 2013) The role of the right hemisphere in aphasia recovery after left hemi- that helps restore task function. We combined focal off-line sphere damage remains unclear. Increased activation of the right continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) before a task with dy- hemisphere has been observed after left hemisphere damage. This namic causal modeling (DCM) of MRI data. Virtual lesions were maysimplyreflect a release from transcallosal inhibition that does applied to the left posterior IFG (pIFG), an area previously as- not contribute to language functions. Alternatively, the right hemi- sociated with phonetic encoding during speech production (9), or sphere may actively contribute to language functions by supporting to the anterior IFG (aIFG) as the control area.
    [Show full text]
  • Meta-Analytic Connectivity Modeling of Brodmann Area 37
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences Sciences 12-17-2014 Language and Visual Perception Associations: Meta-Analytic Connectivity Modeling of Brodmann Area 37 Alfredo Ardilla Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Florida International University, [email protected] Byron Bernal Miami Children's Hospital Monica Rosselli Florida Atlantic University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cnhs_fac Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Ardilla, Alfredo; Bernal, Byron; and Rosselli, Monica, "Language and Visual Perception Associations: Meta-Analytic Connectivity Modeling of Brodmann Area 37" (2014). Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences. 1. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cnhs_fac/1 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Behavioural Neurology Volume 2015, Article ID 565871, 14 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/565871 Research Article Language and Visual Perception Associations: Meta-Analytic Connectivity Modeling of Brodmann Area 37 Alfredo Ardila,1 Byron Bernal,2 and Monica Rosselli3 1 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA 2Radiology Department and Research Institute, Miami Children’s Hospital, Miami, FL 33155, USA 3Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Alfredo Ardila; [email protected] Received 4 November 2014; Revised 9 December 2014; Accepted 17 December 2014 Academic Editor: Annalena Venneri Copyright © 2015 Alfredo Ardila et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Aos with Nonfluent Aphasia from Stroke
    23-2-2016 Introduction Apraxia of Speech Symposium, The recovery and dissolution, or continuing worsening, of speech in stroke induced Beetsterzwaag, February 2016 apraxia of speech (sAoS) and progressive AoS (pAoS) when considering the symptoms of AoS, appear to be reversals of each other. I will compare speech breakdown following stroke and progressive brain damage. The Recovery and Dissolution of Apraxia of Speech The current evidence suggests that sAoS is distinct from pAoS. This suggests different causes that have relevance for management of pAoS. I plan to sketch… Following Brain Damage . • the recovery of AoS following aphasia from stroke • And contrast it to what is known about the gradual dissolution of speech in progressive AoS. • These two opposing patterns - gradual recovery vs. gradual dissolution - arise Chris Code from separate forms of brain damage & are significantly different, although they Centre for Clinical Neuropsychological Research share some major features. Department of Psychology University of Exeter, UK • The neural representation of speech is not unitary, but a complex [email protected] arrangement of abilities processed in distinct neural networks in separate anatomical locations. The role of accompanying impaired cognitive functions, have a significant impact on the emergence of apraxic symptoms following stroke and emerging in progressive AoS. Mohr et al. (1978), following a large survey of cases, concluded that Broca’s aphasia did not result Apraxia of speech more rarely occurs on its own, but is most often accompanied by from a lesion limited to Broca’s area, but resulted from: nonfluent aphasia. In fact, ‘nonfluency’ is defined in terms of impairments of articulatory agility and prosody (Goodglass & Kaplan, Poeck et al (in Code, etc) • a large lesion involving the area of supply of the upper division of the left middle-cerebral artery which produces a global aphasia.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Role of Inflectional Morphology in Agrammatism
    Chapter 3 On the Role of Inflectional Morphology in Agrammatism Ria de Bleser & Josef Bayer 1. Introduction There is an ongoing debate in gencrative linguistics as to the place 0 f mor­ phology, and in particular of inflection, in a model of grammar. We have argued in de Bleser and Bayer (1986) that lexical rnorphology is an appropriate framework to explain data from certain aphasic patients who show dissocia­ tiOIlS between a retained Illorphophonological lexicon and a disrupted syn­ tactic and semantic system. Our purpose here is to show how lexical morphology can also explain data from argrammatic aphasics in an elegant and consistent way. The performance of three German-speaking agrammatics in various experimental tasks demonstrates a surprisingly good command over inflected forms in addition to other aspects of morphology in the face of a relatively impoverished syntax. The elicited data are incompatible with those accounts of agrammatism which assume a total abolition 0 f morphosyntax or a deficit in accessing bound morphemes. The data also contradict explana­ tions which take agrammatism to be a processing disorder, ",bile syntactic representations are largely preserved. Retention of a rich lexicon by agram­ matics may account for both their morphosyntactic abilities and their deficit(s) in syntax proper. 2. Two Ways of Locating Morphology in Generative Grammar For the purpose of this c~apfer, we make a simplified distinction between two classes of generative theories, (a) the split morphology theories (SMT) and (b) the lexical morphology theories (LMT). With SMT, we refer to models 45 ·1 \\ hr,lr !,'cdlc Ililkltionalnlorphology outside of the lexicon and in a compo­ UvlT as a theoretical account.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study 1 & 2
    CASE Courtesy of: STUDY Mitchell S.V. Elkind, MD, Columbia University 1 & 2 and Shadi Yaghi, MD. Brown University CASE 1 CASE 1 A 20 year old man with no past medical history presented to a primary stroke center with sudden left sided weakness and imbalance followed by decreased level of consciousness. Head CT showed no hemorrhage, no acute ischemic changes, and a hyper-dense basilar artery. CT angiography showed a mid-basilar occlusion. CASE 1 CONTINUED Head CT showed no hemorrhage, no acute ischemic changes, and a hyper-dense basilar artery (Figure 1, arrow). CT angiography showed a mid-basilar occlusion (Figure 2, arrow). INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS Fig. 1 AND FAMILIESFig. 2 CASE 1 CONTINUED He received Alteplase intravenous tPA and was transferred to a comprehensive stroke center where angiography confirmed mid-basilar occlusion (Figure 3, arrow ). He underwent mechanical thrombectomy (Figure 4) with recanalization of the basilar artery. His neurological exam improved and he was discharged to home after 2 days. At his 3 month follow up, he was back to normal and returned to college. Fig. 3 Fig. 4 CASE 2 CASE 2 A 62 year old woman with a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented to a primary stroke center with sudden onset of weakness of the right side. On examination, she had a global aphasia, left gaze preference, right homonymous hemianopsia (field cut), right facial droop, dysarthria, and right hemiplegia (NIH Stroke Scale = 22). Head CT showed only equivocal hypodensity in the left middle cerebral artery territory (Figure 1 on next slide). CT angiography showed a left middle cerebral artery occlusion (Figure 2 on next slide, arrow).
    [Show full text]
  • AGRAMMATISM in APHASICS and NORMALS Language Deficits
    Agrammatism in Aphasics and Normals 1 Running head: AGRAMMATISM IN APHASICS AND NORMALS Language Deficits, Localization, and Grammar: Evidence for a Distributive Model of Language Breakdown in Aphasics and Normals Frederic Dick and Elizabeth Bates Jennifer Aydelott Utman Center for Research in Language and Department of Center for Research in Language, University of Cognitive Science, California, San Diego, and University of California, San Diego Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University Beverly Wulfeck Nina Dronkers Center for Research in Language and VA Northern California Health Care System Department of Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University Morton Ann Gernsbacher Department of Psychology and The Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison This is a pre-print of an article in press in Psychological Review Corresponding Author: Frederic Dick Center for Research in Language Department of Cognitive Science UCSD 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0526 La Jolla, CA 92037-0526 [email protected] Agrammatism in Aphasics and Normals 2 Abstract discoveries launched a century of debate (still unresolved) revolving around the nature of these and Selective deficits in aphasics' grammatical other contrasting forms of aphasia, and their neural production and comprehension are often cited as correlates. Although any dichotomy is an evidence that syntactic processing is modular and oversimplification when it is applied to questions of localizable in discrete areas of the brain (e.g., this magnitude, the poles of this debate have been Grodzinsky, 2000). In this paper, we review a large defined (and can still be defined) in terms of the body of experimental evidence suggesting that theorist’s stand on three related issues: localization, morphosyntactic deficits can be observed in a number transparency of mapping, and domain specificity.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Aphasic Phenomena
    LE JOURNAL CANAD1EN DES SCIENCES NEUROLOG1QUES Classification of Aphasic Phenomena ANDREW KERTESZ SUMMARY: A brief but comprehensive Most clinicians will agree that al­ tions cover the same phenomenon. survey of classifying aphasia reveals though aphasic disability is complex, In Table I the various terms are that most investigators describe at least many patients are clinically similar shown to overlap and those describ­ four major groups, conveniently labelled and may be classified into identifi­ ing the same disturbance appear un­ Broca's, Wernicke's, anomic and global. able groups. There are many classi­ derneath each other. Four columns Conduction and transcortical aphasias fications indicating that none is al­ appear to represent the entities that are less generally described and mod­ ality specific syndromes rarely, if ever, together satisfactory. Nevertheless, almost everybody identifies: exist purely. The controversy between this effort is useful and even neces­ 1. What Broca (1861) described as unifiers and splitters continues but ob­ sary to diagnose and treat aphasics aphemia, Wernicke (1874) called jective numerical taxonomy may solve and to understand the phenomena. motor aphasia. Marie (1906) did not some of the problems of classification. The opponents of classification consider Broca's aphemia true point out the numerous disagree­ aphasia. Pick (1913) labelled it ex­ ments among observers, the many pressive aphasia with agrammatism RESUME: Line etude breve, mais com­ exceptions that cannot be fitted into and Weisenburg & McBride (1935) prehensive, de la classification de categories and the frequent evolu­ popularized "expressive aphasia" I'aphasic revile que la plupart des cher- cheurs decrivent au moins 4 groupes tion of certain types into others.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity and the BRAIN RT4258 Prelims.Fm Page Ii Thursday, January 20, 2005 7:01 PM Creativity and the BRAIN
    Creativity AND THE BRAIN RT4258_Prelims.fm Page ii Thursday, January 20, 2005 7:01 PM Creativity AND THE BRAIN Kenneth M. Heilman Psychology Press New York and Hove RT4258_Prelims.fm Page iv Thursday, January 20, 2005 7:01 PM Published in 2005 by Published in Great Britain by Psychology Press Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group Taylor & Francis Group 270 Madison Avenue 27 Church Road New York, NY 10016 Hove, East Sussex BN3 2FA © 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group Psychology Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10987654321 International Standard Book Number-10: 1-84169-425-8 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-8416-9425-2 (Hardcover) No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trade- marks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Heilman, Kenneth M., 1938-. Creativity and the brain/Kenneth M. Heilman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-84169-425-8 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Creative ability. 2. Neuropsychology. I. Title. QP360.H435 2005 153.3’5—dc22 2004009960 Visit the Taylor & Francis
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropsychologica the Past and Future of Neuropsychology
    REVIEW ARTICLE ACTA Vol. 4, No. 1/2, 2006, 1-12 NEUROPSYCHOLOGICA THE PAST AND FUTURE OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY J.M. Glozman Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Key words: locationalism, anti-locationalism, dynamic brain systems, Lurian neuropsychology SUMMARY The history of neuropsychology can be conceived in three conceptually and chronologically overlapping phases. The first phase, dominated by the dialectic between locationism and holism (antilocationism), focused on reduc- ing the human mind to the activity of neural processors (locationism), or of the brain as a whole (holism). In the second phase, marked by the introduction of Luria's concept of dynamic systems, mind is derived from the interaction of dynamic neural systems, whose components are dispersed both horizontally and vertically, and the concept of syndrome becomes prominent. In the third phase, neuropsychologists have begun to look at the brain as part of a whole human being, who lives in a particular ecosphere and comes into contact with other human beings. This last phase, which also draws inspiration from Luria's work, has pushed neuropsychology into new fields of inquiry, such as per- sonality and family dynamics. It has also been marked by a shift from product- based to process-based neuropsychology, and the emergence of quality of life as a goal and outcome measure in neuropsychological rehabilitation. INTRODUCTION All over the world contemporary neuropsychology is demonstrating a gene- ral tendency to replace state-based neuropsychology, which relates the brain- damaged individual's symptoms to the precise location of cerebral lesions, with a more dynamic, process-based neuropsychology, which analyzes the dynamics of the brain-behavior interaction (Tupper & Cicerone 1990, Glozman 1999a).
    [Show full text]
  • Stroke and Aphasia Aphasia Is a Language Disorder That Affects the Ability to Communicate
    Recovery Primary motor cortex Primary sensory cortex let’s talk about Broca’s area Stroke and Aphasia Aphasia is a language disorder that affects the ability to communicate. It’s most often caused by strokes that occur in areas of the brain that control Primary auditory area Primary speech and language. Wernicke’s area visual cortex Certain areas of the brain (usually in the left side of the brain) influence one’s ability to communicate and understand language. When a stroke occurs in one of these areas, it may result in aphasia. What are the effects of aphasia? sender plissen.” Thousands of alert, intelligent men and Aphasia does not affect intelligence. Stroke survivors women are suddenly plunged into a world of jumbled remain mentally alert, even though their speech may communication because of aphasia. be jumbled, fragmented or impossible to understand. Are there different types of aphasia? Some survivors continue to have: Yes, there are several forms of aphasia. They include: • Trouble speaking, like “getting the words out” • Global aphasia — People with this aphasia may • Trouble finding words be completely unable to speak, name objects, repeat • Problems understanding what others say phrases or follow commands. • Problems with reading, writing or math • Broca’s aphasia — The person knows what they • Inability to process long words and infrequently want to say, but can’t find the right words (can’t get used words the words out). • Wernicke’s aphasia — A person with this aphasia How does it feel to have aphasia? can seldom understand what’s being said or control People with aphasia are often frustrated and confused what they’re saying.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Generated By
    The Evolution of Language: Towards Gestural Hypotheses DIS/CONTINUITIES TORUŃ STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE Edited by Mirosława Buchholtz Advisory Board Leszek Berezowski (Wrocław University) Annick Duperray (University of Provence) Dorota Guttfeld (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Grzegorz Koneczniak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Piotr Skrzypczak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Jordan Zlatev (Lund University) Vol. 20 DIS/CONTINUITIES Przemysław ywiczy ski / Sławomir Wacewicz TORUŃ STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE Ż ń Edited by Mirosława Buchholtz Advisory Board Leszek Berezowski (Wrocław University) Annick Duperray (University of Provence) Dorota Guttfeld (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Grzegorz Koneczniak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) The Evolution of Language: Piotr Skrzypczak (Nicolaus Copernicus University) Jordan Zlatev (Lund University) Towards Gestural Hypotheses Vol. 20 Bibliographic Information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. The translation, publication and editing of this book was financed by a grant from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland within the programme Uniwersalia 2.1 (ID: 347247, Reg. no. 21H 16 0049 84) as a part of the National Programme for the Development of the Humanities. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Ministry cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Translators: Marek Placi ski, Monika Boruta Supervision and proofreading: John Kearns Cover illustration: © ńMateusz Pawlik Printed by CPI books GmbH, Leck ISSN 2193-4207 ISBN 978-3-631-79022-9 (Print) E-ISBN 978-3-631-79393-0 (E-PDF) E-ISBN 978-3-631-79394-7 (EPUB) E-ISBN 978-3-631-79395-4 (MOBI) DOI 10.3726/b15805 Open Access: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 unported license.
    [Show full text]
  • Conduction Aphasia, Sensory-Motor Integration, and Phonological Short-Term Memory – an Aggregate Analysis of Lesion and Fmri Data ⇑ Bradley R
    Brain & Language 119 (2011) 119–128 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Brain & Language journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/b&l Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration, and phonological short-term memory – An aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data ⇑ Bradley R. Buchsbaum a, , Juliana Baldo b, Kayoko Okada d, Karen F. Berman e, Nina Dronkers b, ⇑ Mark D’Esposito c, Gregory Hickok d, a Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada b VA Northern California Health Care System, Center for Aphasia and Related Disorders, Martinez, CA, USA c Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA d Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA e Section on Integrative Neuroimaging, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA article info abstract Article history: Conduction aphasia is a language disorder characterized by frequent speech errors, impaired verbatim Accepted 11 December 2010 repetition, a deficit in phonological short-term memory, and naming difficulties in the presence of other- Available online 21 January 2011 wise fluent and grammatical speech output. While traditional models of conduction aphasia have typi- cally implicated white matter pathways, recent advances in lesions reconstruction methodology Keywords: applied to groups of patients have implicated left temporoparietal zones. Parallel work using functional Conduction aphasia magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has pinpointed a region in the posterior most portion of the left pla- Working memory num temporale, area Spt, which is critical for phonological working memory. Here we show that the Speech production region of maximal lesion overlap in a sample of 14 patients with conduction aphasia perfectly circum- Planum temporale Brain lesion scribes area Spt, as defined in an aggregate fMRI analysis of 105 subjects performing a phonological work- Sensorimotor integration ing memory task.
    [Show full text]