2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin

Full-Time Faculty 1

Juris Doctor Program 15

Joint Degree Programs 43

Graduate Programs 55

General Administrative Policies 79

Conduct Policies 91

Tuition and Fees 115

Law Curriculum 123

APpendices 129 Appendix A: Directory of Administrative Officers and 131 o f C on t en s Table Officers of Instruction

Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 143

Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty 159

Appendix D: Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Faculty 171 Award Recipients

Appendix E: Scholarships 173

Appendix F: Loans 185

Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 187

This Bulletin contains information about the faculty of the Law Center, the law curriculum and degree requirements, and policies governing members of the community. Students are responsible for knowledge of its content. i ii Deans and Vice Presidents 3

Full-Time Faculty 4 t y acul f ull- t ime

1 iv Full-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty 3

embers of the Law Center faculty represent an extraordinary range of professional and Mscholarly accomplishment in every area of legal practice. Many have achieved national or international prominence and remain actively involved in their specialized field. Members of the Georgetown faculty share a common commitment to teaching; they place a special value on accessibility and informal discussion. They share the desire to help students learn how to view each legal issue from the broadest intellectual and social perspective. They are committed to helping every student develop the habits of mind that are characteristic of the best lawyers. DEANS AND VICE PRESIDENTS Everett Bellamy Senior Assistant Dean (J.D. Program); T. Alexander Aleinikoff Adjunct Professor of Law Executive Vice President, Law Center B.S., M.S., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Affairs; Dean of the Law Center; Professor Cleveland-Marshall of Law B.A., Swarthmore; J.D., Yale Nancy Cantalupo Assistant Dean (Clinical Programs); Adjunct Professor Aleinikoff joined the law faculty Professor of Law after having served as the Executive B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown Associate Commissioner for Programs in the U.S. Department of Justice’s Immigra- Lawrence J. Center tion and Naturalization Service and as Assistant Dean (Academic Conferences and General Counsel in the Immigration and Continuing Legal Education) Naturalization Service. He has been on B.A., Syracuse; J.D., Georgetown the faculty at the University of Michigan Law School. After receiving his law degree, Kevin T. Conry he served as law clerk to the Honorable Vice President (Strategic Development and Edward Weinfeld, U.S. District Judge. He External Affairs); Adjunct Professor of Law has published numerous articles in the areas B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown of immigration refugee and citizenship law and policy, constitutional law, statutory Andrew P. Cornblatt interpretation and race discrimination. His Associate Vice President (Graduate Admis- most recent books include Semblances of sions Programs and Enrollment); Dean of Sovereignty: The Constitution, the State, and Admissions American Citizenship; Citizenship Policies B.A., Harvard; J.D., Boston College for An Age of Migration (with Douglas Klusmeyer); Immigration: Process and Policy Linda D. Davidson (with David Martin, Hiroshi Motomura, and Associate Vice President and Chief Financial Maryellen Fullerton); and Modern Constitu- Officer tional Theory: A Reader (with John Garvey B.S., Indiana University of Pennsylvania and Daniel Farber). Deborah Epstein Mitchell C. Bailin Associate Dean (Clinical Education and Dean of Students Public Interest & Community Service A.B., Harvard; M.St., Oxford; J.D., Yale Programs); Director, Domestic Violence Clinic; Professor of Law B.A., Brown; J.D., New York University

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 4 Full-Time Faculty

Gihan Fernando Therese Lee Stratton Assistant Dean (Career Services) Assistant Dean (Faculty Support and B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Georgetown Campus Services) B.S., M.S., Virginia Tech R. Scott Foster Assistant Dean and Administrative Director, Robin L. West Center for Transnational Legal Studies Associate Dean (Research and Academic B.A., Harvard; J.D., George Washington; Programs); Frederick J. Haas Professor of LL.M., Georgetown Law and Philosophy B.A., J.D., University of Maryland; J.S.M., Vicki C. Jackson Stanford Associate Dean (Transnational Legal Studies); Carmack Waterhouse Professor of FULL-TIME FACULTY Constitutional Law B.A., J.D., Yale Charles F. Abernathy Professor of Law Sally McCarthy A.B., J.D., LL.M., Harvard Assistant Dean (J.D. Academic Services) B.A., Bowdoin; J.D., Northeastern Lama Abu-Odeh Professor of Law Pablo G. Molina LL.B., University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Associate Vice President (Information LL.M., University of Bristol, England; M.A., Services for Emerging Technologies) and University of York, England; S.J.D., Harvard Chief Information Officer B.A., M.B.A., St. Louis University Jane H. Aiken Professor of Law Barbara Moulton B.A., Hollins College; J.D., New York Assistant Dean (Public Interest and Commu- University; LL.M., Georgetown nity Service) B.A., Assumption College; J.D., Georgetown Judith C. Areen Paul Regis Dean Professor of Law Carol Q. O’Neil A.B., Cornell; J.D., Yale Associate Dean (Academic Administration); Adjunct Professor of Law Hope Babcock B.A., Manhattanville College; M.A.T., Professor of Law University of Massachusetts; J.D., George- B.A., Smith College; LL.B., Yale town Aharon Barak Wendy Collins Perdue Visiting Professor of Law Associate Dean (Graduate Programs); LL.M., LL.D. (Hon.), Hebrew University Professor of Law B.A., Wellesley; J.D., Duke Randy E. Barnett Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Charles W. Pruett, III Theory Assistant Dean (Financial Aid) B.A., Northwestern; J.D., Harvard B.A., J.D., George Washington

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Full-Time Faculty 5

Jeffrey D. Bauman J. Peter Byrne Co-Director, Center for the Study of the Faculty Director, Georgetown Environ- Legal Profession; Professor of Law mental Law and Policy Program; Faculty B.A., M.A., LL.B., Yale Director, State-Federal Climate Resource Center; Professor of Law Andrea Biondi B.A., Northwestern; M.A., J.D., University Visiting Professor of Law of Virginia J.D., M.A., Ph.D., University of Florence Angela J. Campbell Susan Low Bloch Director, Institute for Public Representation; Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., Smith; M.A., Ph.C., J.D., University of B.A., Hampshire; J.D., University of Cali- Michigan fornia, Los Angeles; LL.M., Georgetown

Maxwell Gregg Bloche Barry E. Carter Co-Director, Georgetown-Johns Hopkins Director, Program on International Business Joint Program in Law and Public Health; and Economic Law; Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., Stanford; M.P.A., Princeton; J.D., Yale B.A., Columbia; J.D., M.D., Yale Sheryll D. Cashin Sonya G. Bonneau Professor of Law Associate Professor of Legal Research and B.E., Vanderbilt; M.A., Oxford; J.D., Writing Harvard B.A., Cornell; J.D., University of California, Berkeley Michael J. Cedrone Associate Professor of Legal Research and William W. Bratton Writing Peter P. Weidenbruch, Jr. Professor of Busi- A.B., Harvard; M.A.T., Boston University; ness Law J.D., Georgetown B.A., J.D., Columbia Paul D. Clement Stephen Bright Distinguished Visitor from Practice Visiting Professor of Law B.S.F.S., Georgetown; M. Phil., Cambridge; B.A., J.D., University of Kentucky J.D., Harvard

Rosa Brooks Julie E. Cohen Faculty Director, Human Rights Institute; Professor of Law Professor of Law A.B., Harvard-Radcliffe; J.D., Harvard A.B., Harvard; M.St., Oxford; J.D., Yale Stephen B. Cohen Christopher Brummer Professor of Law Professor of Law A.B., Amherst; J.D., Yale A.B., Washington University in St. Louis; J.D., Columbia; Ph.D., University of Chicago Sherman L. Cohn Professor of Law B.S.F.S., LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 6 Full-Time Faculty

David D. Cole Laura Donohue Professor of Law Associate Professor of Law B.A., J.D., Yale A.B., Dartmouth; M.A., University of Ulster, Northern Ireland; Ph.D., University of Anthony E. Cook Cambridge; J.D., Stanford Professor of Law B.A., Princeton; J.D., Yale Michael Doran Professor of Law John M. Copacino B.A., Wesleyan University; J.D., Yale Director, Criminal Justice Clinic and E. Barrett Prettyman Program; Professor of Mark Dybul Law Co-Director, Global Health Law Center, B.A., M.A.T., Duke; J.D., University of O’Neill Institute; Visiting Professor Virginia; LL.M., Georgetown A.B., M.D., Georgetown

Frances C. DeLaurentis Peter B. Edelman Professor of Legal Research and Writing Co-Director, Joint Degree in Law and Public B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., Catholic University Policy; Faculty Director, Center on Poverty, Inequality, and Public Policy; Professor of Michael R. Diamond Law Director of the Harrison Institute for A.B., LL.B., Harvard Housing and Community Development; Professor of Law Todd Edelman B.A., Syracuse; J.D., Fordham; LL.M., New Visiting Associate Professor of Law, Criminal York University Justice Clinic B.A., Yale; J.D., New York University Richard D. Diamond Professor of Law Daniel R. Ernst A.B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., Yale Professor of Law B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Chicago; M.A., Viet D. Dinh Ph.D., Princeton; LL.M., University of Co-Director, Georgetown Law - Asia; Wisconsin Professor of Law A.B., J.D., Harvard James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Sharon Dolovich Studies; Co-Director, Georgetown Law - Visiting Professor of Law Asia B.A. Queen’s University; Ph.D., Cambridge B.A., M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., Yale; J.D., University; J.D. Harvard Harvard

Diana Roberto Donahoe Chai R. Feldblum Professor of Legal Research and Writing Director, Federal Legislation and Admin- B.A., Williams College; J.D., LL.M., George- istrative Clinic; Co-Director, Workplace town Flexibility 2010; Professor of Law B.A., Barnard; J.D., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Full-Time Faculty 7

Heidi Li Feldman Lawrence O. Gostin Co-Director, Joint Degree in Law and Linda D. and Timothy J. O’Neill Professor Philosophy; Professor of Law of Global Health Law; Faculty Director, A.B., Brown; J.D., Ph.D., University of O’Neill Institute for National and Global Michigan Health Law (Spring) B.A., State University of New York, Brock- James Forman Jr. port; J.D., Duke; LL.D. (Hon.), State Univer- Professor of Law sity of New York A.B., Brown; J.D., Yale Michael H. Gottesman Monroe Freedman Professor of Law Visiting Professor of Law A.B., Chicago; LL.B., Yale A.B., LL.B., LL.M., Harvard Charles H. Gustafson Martin D. Ginsburg Professor of Law Professor of Law B.S., Buffalo; J.D., Chicago A.B., Cornell; J.D., Harvard Robert J. Haft Vicki W. Girard Professor of Law Professor of Legal Research and Writing B.A., City College of New York; J.D., B.A., Drew University; J.D., Georgetown Columbia

Steven P. Goldberg Pamela Harris James and Catherine Denny Professor of Executive Director, Supreme Court Institute; Law Visiting Professor of Law A.B., Harvard; J.D., Yale B.A., J.D., Yale

Steven H. Goldblatt John Hasnas Director, Appellate Litigation Clinic; Visiting Associate Professor of Law Director, Supreme Court Institute; Professor B.A., Lafayette College; J.D., Ph.D., Duke; of Law LL.M., Temple University B.A., Franklin and Marshall; J.D., George- town Lisa Heinzerling Professor of Law Michael Golden A.B., Princeton; J.D., Chicago Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing Melissa N. Henke B.S., University of Virginia; J.D., George- Associate Professor of Legal Research and town Writing B.A., University of Kentucky; J.D., George Richard Goldstone Washington Distinguished Visitor from the Judiciary B.A., LL.B., University of the Witwatersrand Kristin Nicole Henning Deputy Director, Juvenile Justice Clinic; Professor of Law B.A., Duke; J.D., Yale; LL.M., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 8 Full-Time Faculty

Burkhard Hess Gregory Klass Visiting Professor of Law Associate Professor of Law Dr. jur. Habil, Munich B.A., Carleton; M.A., Ph.D., New School for Social Research; J.D., Yale Craig Hoffman Professor of U.S. Legal Discourse Laurie S. Kohn B.A., William & Mary; Ph.D., University of Visiting Associate Professor of Law; Connecticut; J.D., University of Texas Co-Director, Domestic Violence Clinic B.A., Harvard; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Judith Richards Hope Distinguished Visitor from Practice David A. Koplow A.B., Wellesley; J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), Harvard Director, Center for Applied Legal Studies; Professor of Law Charisma X. Howell B.A., Harvard; Queen’s College, Oxford, Visiting Associate Professor of Law England; J.D., Yale B.S., Arizona State; J.D., California Western Abe Krash Nan Hunter Distinguished Visitor from Practice Faculty Director, O’Neill Institute for B.A., J.D., Chicago National and Global Health Law (Fall); Professor of Law Michael Lang B.A., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown Visiting Professor of Law Mag. iur., Studies of Economics, Vienna John H. Jackson University of Economics & Business Admin- Director, Institute of International Economic istration & of Law, University of Vienna; Dr. Law; University Professor iur., University of Vienna A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Michigan; LL.D. (Hon.), Hamburg University, Germany Donald C. Langevoort Thomas Aquinas Reynolds Professor of Law; Emma Coleman Jordan Co-Director, Joint Degree in Law and Busi- Professor of Law ness Administration B.A., San Francisco State University; J.D., B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard Howard Charles R. Lawrence, III Neal K. Katyal Professor of Law Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of B.A., Haverford; J.D., Yale National Security Law; Director, Center on National Security and the Law Richard J. Lazarus A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Yale Director, Supreme Court Institute; Professor of Law Patricia A. King B.S., B.A., University of Illinois; J.D., Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Law, Harvard Medicine, Ethics, and Public Policy B.A., Wheaton College; J.D., Harvard Martin S. Lederman Associate Professor of Law A.B., University of Michigan; J.D., Yale

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Full-Time Faculty 9

Adam J. Levitin Wallace J. Mlyniec Associate Professor of Law Lupo-Ricci Professor of Clinical Legal A.B., Harvard; A.M., M.Phil., Columbia; Studies; Director, Juvenile Justice Clinic J.D., Harvard B.S., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown

Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir Jonathan T. Molot Visiting Associate Professor of Law Professor of Law LL.B, LL.D., Hebrew University of Jerusalem B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard

David J. Luban Aryeh Neier University Professor Robert F. Drinan, S.J., Visiting Professor of B.A., University of Chicago; M.A., M.Phil., Human Rights Ph.D., Yale B.S., Cornell

Mari J. Matsuda Eleanor Holmes Norton Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., Arizona State; J.D., Hawaii; LL.M., B.A., Antioch; M.A., LL.B., Yale Harvard Victoria Nourse Margaret McKeown Visiting Professor of Law Distinguished Visitor from the Judiciary B.A., Stanford; J.D., University of California, B.A., University of Wyoming; J.D., George- Berkeley town Julie Rose O’Sullivan Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow Professor of Law A.B. Chettle, Jr. Professor of Dispute Resolu- A.B., Stanford; J.D., Cornell tion and Civil Procedure A.B., Barnard; J.D., University of Pennsyl- James C. Oldham vania; LL.D., Quinnipiac St. Thomas More Professor of Law and Legal History Naomi Mezey B.S., Duke; LL.B., Stanford; M.S.B.A., Professor of Law University of Denver B.A., Wesleyan; M.A., University of Minne- sota; J.D., Stanford John F. Olson Distinguished Visitor from Practice John Mikhail B.A., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., Professor of Law Harvard B.A., Amherst; Ph.D., Cornell; J.D., Stanford Ladislas Orsy, S.J. Andrew Mitchell Visiting Professor of Law Visiting Associate Professor of Law M.A., Oxford; D.C.L., Gregorian University, B.Com. (Hons), LL.B. (Hons), Grad. Dip. Rome; L.Ph., L.S.T., School of Theology, St. Intl L., University of Melbourne; LL.M., Albert, Belgium Harvard; Ph.D., University of Cambridge

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 10 Full-Time Faculty

Joseph A. Page Peter Reilly Director, Center for the Advancement of the Visiting Associate Professor of Law Rule of Law in the Americas; Professor of B.A., Princeton; J.D., Harvard Law B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Harvard Alice Ristroph Visiting Professor of Law Elizabeth Hayes Patterson J.D., Ph.D., Harvard Associate Professor of Law A.B., Emmanuel; J.D., Catholic University Richard L. Roe Director, D.C. Street Law Clinic; Professor Ronald A. Pearlman of Law Professor of Law B.A., Yale; J.D., University of Maine B.A., J.D., Northwestern; LL.M., George- town Daria Roithmayr Visiting Professor of Law Deborah N. Pearlstein B.S., University of California, Los Angeles; Visiting Associate Professor of Law J.D., Georgetown A.B., Cornell; J.D., Harvard Laura Rose Gary Peller Visiting Associate Professor of Law, Criminal Professor of Law Justice Clinic B.A., Emory; J.D., Harvard B.A., Trinity University; J.D., Antioch; LL.M., Georgetown Robert J. Peroni Visiting Professor of Law Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz B.S.C., DePaul; J.D., Northwestern; LL.M., Associate Professor of Law New York University B.A., J.D., Yale Nina Pillard Julia L. Ross Professor of Law Professor of Legal Research and Writing B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard B.A., Hamilton College; J.D., Harvard Robert Pitofsky Susan Deller Ross Joseph and Madeline Sheehy Professor of Director, International Women’s Human Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law; Dean Rights Clinic; Professor of Law Emeritus B.A., Knox; J.D., New York University A.B., New York University; LL.B., Columbia

John Podesta Tanina Rostain Visiting Professor of Law Distinguished Visitor from Practice B.A., Knox; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Swarthmore; M.A., J.D., Yale Paul F. Rothstein Milton C. Regan Jr. Professor of Law Co-Director, Center for the Study of the B.S., J.D., Northwestern Legal Profession, Professor of Law B.A., University of Houston; M.A., Univer- Peter J. Rubin sity of California, Los Angeles; J.D., George- Professor of Law town B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Full-Time Faculty 11

Steven C. Salop Jeffrey Shulman Professor of Economics and Law Associate Professor of Legal Research and B.A., University of Pennsylvania; M.Phil., Writing Ph.D., Yale B.A., University of Maryland; J.D., George- town; Ph.D., University of Wisconsin Alvaro Santos Associate Professor of Law Laurence H. Silberman J.D., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Distinguished Visitor from the Judiciary México; LL.M., S.J.D., Harvard A.B., Dartmouth; LL.B., Harvard

Andrew I. Schoenholtz Carole Silver Deputy Director, Georgetown University Executive Director, Center for the Study of Institute for the Study of International the Legal Profession; Visiting Professor of Migration; Visiting Professor of Law Law B.A., Hamilton; J.D., Harvard; Ph.D., Brown B.A., Michigan; J.D., Indiana

David Schorr Rima Sirota Visiting Associate Professor of Law Associate Professor of Legal Research and B.A., Columbia; LL.B., Hebrew University; Writing M.A., LL.M., J.S.D., Yale B.A., Trinity College; J.D., Harvard

Philip G. Schrag Stafford Smiley Director, Center for Applied Legal Studies; Visiting Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard A.B., Harvard; LL.B., Yale Abbe Smith Louis Michael Seidman Co-Director, Criminal Justice Clinic and Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitu- E. Barrett Prettyman Fellowship Program; tional Law Professor of Law A.B., Chicago; J.D., Harvard B.A., Yale; J.D., New York University

Mortimer Sellers Girardeau A. Spann Visiting Professor of Law Professor of Law A.B., J.D., Harvard; B.C.L., D. Phil., Oxford A.B., Princeton; J.D., Harvard

Howard Shelanski Russell B. Stevenson, Jr. Professor of Law Visiting Associate Professor of Law B.A., Haverford; M.A., J.D., Ph.D., Univer- J.D., Harvard sity of California, Berkeley David P. Stewart Jodi Short Visiting Professor of Law Associate Professor of Law B.A., Princeton; M.A., J.D., Yale; LL.M., B.A., Duke; J.D., Georgetown; Ph.D., New York University University of California, Berkeley

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 12 Full-Time Faculty

Jane E. Stromseth Rebecca L. Tushnet Co-Director, Joint Degree in Law and Professor of Law Foreign Service; Professor of Law B.A., Harvard; J.D., Yale B.A., Swarthmore; D.Phil., Oxford; J.D., Yale Carlos Manuel Vázquez Professor of Law Robert K. Stumberg B.A., Yale; J.D., Columbia Director, Harrison Institute for Public Law; Professor of Law David C. Vladeck B.A., Macalester; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Professor of Law B.A., New York University; J.D., Columbia; Peter W. Tague LL.M., Georgetown Professor of Law A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Michigan Tania Voon Daniel K. Tarullo Visiting Associate Professor of Law B.Sc., LL.B. (Hons), Grad. Dip. Intl L., Professor of Law A.B., Georgetown; M.A., Duke; J.D., Univer- University of Melbourne; LL.M., Harvard sity of Michigan Law School; Ph.D., University of Cambridge

Allyn Taylor William T. Vukowich Visiting Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., J.D., University of California, Berkeley; A.B., Indiana; J.D., University of California, LL.M., J.S.D., Columbia Berkeley; J.S.D., Columbia

Joshua C. Teitelbaum Heathcote Woolsey Wales Associate Professor of Law Associate Professor of Law B.A., Williams College; J.D., Harvard; Ph.D. A.B., University of North Carolina; J.D., Candidate, Cornell University of Chicago

John R. Thomas Silas J. Wasserstrom Professor of Law Professor of Law B.S., Carnegie Mellon; J.D., University of A.B., Amherst; LL.B., Yale Michigan; LL.M., George Washington Seth Waxman Robert B. Thompson Distinguished Visitor from Practice Visiting Professor of Law A.B., Harvard; J.D., Yale B.A., Vanderbilt; J.D., University of Virginia Edith Brown Weiss Kristen Konrad Tiscione Francis Cabell Brown Professor of Inter- Professor of Legal Research and Writing national Law; Co-Director, Joint Degree in B.A., Wellesley; J.D., Georgetown Law and Government Philomila Tsoukala A.B., Stanford; J.D., Harvard; Ph.D., Univer- Associate Professor of Law sity of California, Berkeley; LL.D. (Hon.), B.A., Conservatory of Northern Greece; Chicago-Kent LL.B., Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; M.A., University Pantheon Assas, Paris II; LL.M., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Full-Time Faculty 13

Franz Werro Professor of Law Licence en droit, Docteur en droit, University of Fribourg; LL.M., University of California, Berkeley

Timothy M. Westmoreland Visiting Professor of Law B.A., Duke; J.D., Yale

Brian Wolfman Visiting Associate Professor of Law B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Harvard

David Wolitz Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing B.A., Stanford; J.D., Yale

Eyal Zamir Visiting Professor of Law LL.B., Dr. Jr., Hebrew University of Jeru- salem

Kathryn Zeiler Professor of Law B.S., Indiana; M.S., Golden Gate University; J.D., University of Southern California; M.S., Ph.D., California Institute of Technology

Raif Zreik Visiting Global Instructor LL.B., LL.M., Hebrew University; LL.M., Columbia; S.J.D., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 14

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 15

FULL-TIME J.D. PROGRAM 17

PART-TIME J.D. PROGRAM 17

J.D. ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS & POLICIES 18

JURIS DOCTOR DEGREE REQUIREMENTS 18

REQUIRED FIRST-YEAR PROGRAM 19

UPPERCLASS LEGAL WRITING REQUIREMENT 19

SUPERVISED RESEARCH 20

ONE PAPER FOR TWO SEMINARS 20

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENT 21

REQUIRED TIME IN RESIDENCE 21

TRANSFER BETWEEN FULL- AND PART-TIME PROGRAMS 22

STUDENTS ON NON-IMMIGRANT VISAS 23

ACADEMIC EVALUATION AND ATTRITION STANDARDS 23 Juris Doc t or Program ATTENDANCE, EXAMINATIONS AND WRITTEN WORK 28

CREDIT FOR SUMMER SESSION STUDY 30

CREDIT FOR STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMS 30

CREDIT FOR COURSES IN THE LAW CENTER 32 GRADUATE PROGRAM

CREDIT FOR COURSES IN THE SCHOOLS OF THE UNIVERSITY 32

CREDIT FOR STUDY OUTSIDE THE LAW CENTER 33

EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM 35

STUDENT-INITIATED SEMINAR 35

DUPLICATION OF COURSES 36

RESTRICTIONS ON STUDENT EMPLOYMENT 36

WITHDRAWALS AND LEAVES OF ABSENCE 36

CLINIC ENROLLMENT POLICIES 37

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 15 16 Juris Doctor Program

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 17

eorgetown University Law Center offers both a full-time and a part-time program leading Gto the Juris Doctor degree. The same standards of performance are required of students in both programs. Members of the full-time faculty teach the courses in both programs, as- sisted by members of the adjunct faculty in certain specialized courses.

FULL-TIME PROGRAM Act, etc.), or by grant of a waiver. Students The program of instruction for the full- seeking a waiver of the five-year require- time program requires a minimum of six ment must submit their written petition and full-time semesters (three academic years) supporting documentation to the Registrar for completion of the degree requirements. as soon as their situation becomes apparent. Full-time students may not advance their Unless a written waiver of this rule is date of graduation by attendance at Summer granted, the five-year rule is strictly enforced. sessions. (See Required Time in Residence: Full-Time Program.) PART-TIME PROGRAM Students enrolled in the full-time The Part-Time Program is designed to program are expected to devote their time allow the part-time student to complete the during the academic year substantially J.D. degree requirements in eight academic to the study of law. During the first year semesters. Students may accelerate their of academic studies, students in the full- program to seven semesters plus 8 or more time program are assigned to a section in credits over two or more Summer sessions. which they take the required program of (See Required Time in Residence: Part-Time 31 academic credits. During the second Program.) and third years, full-time students pursue During the first year, students in the part- an elective program of instruction while time program take a required program of 24 completing the required course in Profes- academic credits in a section which meets sional Responsibility and the upperclass legal during evening hours. During the second- writing requirement. year, part-time students take a required A student in the full-time program may program of 7 academic credits together with not enroll in fewer than 12 or more than elective courses. During the third and fourth 16 academic credits without the permission years, part-time students pursue an elective of the Registrar or an Academic Advisor.* program of study. In addition to the required Students in the full-time program are first- and second- year courses, students must expected to graduate at the end of three complete a course in Professional Respon- academic years, and may take no longer sibility and the upperclass legal writing than five consecutive calendar years from requirement. the date of matriculation in law school to After the first year, a part-time student meet all J.D. degree requirements. If after may not enroll in fewer than 8 or more than five consecutive calendar years a student has 11 academic credits without the permission not yet completed all academic requirements of the Registrar or an Academic Advisor.* necessary to graduate, the student will be Permission to enroll in 12 academic credits withdrawn from the Law Center with no may be given under the following circum- possibility of readmission or graduation, stances: (1) a student registers in a clinic unless excused by operation of law (i.e., that awards 12 credit hours; (2) a student military call-up, Americans with Disabilities registers for a seminar meeting the upperclass * Academic Advisors include the Senior Assistant Dean (J.D. Program), the Assistant Dean (J.D. Aca- demic Services), the Assistant Dean (Clinical Programs), the Director, J.D. Academic Services, or the Dean of Students.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 18 Juris Doctor Program legal writing requirement and he or she has at www.law.georgetown.edu/registrar/ not previously fulfilled the legal writing bulletin/. Notice of changes to academic or requirement; (3) a student in either the Fall administrative policies in this Bulletin are or Spring semester of his or her final year sent to students via e-mail. The primary (but not in both semesters) needs to take means by which the Law Center commu- 12 academic credits to complete the J.D. nicates with students is through the Law degree requirements; (4) a student is a law Center’s e-mail system. Each student has an fellow in the Legal Research and Writing or e-mail address and should check this e-mail USLD program; or (5) a student in the Spring address regularly. semester wishes to take a one-credit course during Week One. Juris Doctor Degree A part-time student enrolled in a Requirements clinic his or her third or fourth year may In order to earn the J.D. degree, a student seek permission from the Registrar or an must successfully complete the following Academic Advisor to exceed the 11-credit academic requirements: maximum in order to take a course required • Students who matriculated at the Law or recommended for the clinic. Part-time Center in August 2008 or thereafter: 85 students who are permitted to take 12 credits credits; in a given semester will continue to be part- • Students who matriculated at the Law time students charged tuition on a per-credit Center prior to August 2008: the credit basis. requirement effective at Georgetown Students in the part-time program are Law at the time of matriculation; expected to graduate within four academic • A minimum of 54 academic credits must years of matriculation and may take no be earned at the Law Center;* longer than six consecutive calendar years • The required first-year curriculum;** from the date of matriculation in law school • The upperclass legal writing require- to meet all J.D. degree requirements. If after ment, described below; six consecutive calendar years a student has • A course in Professional Responsibility; not completed all degree requirements neces- • The required time in residence (“Resi- sary to graduate, the student will be with- dency Requirement”), described below; drawn from the Law Center with no possi- and bility of readmission or graduation, unless • A minimum cumulative grade point excused by operation of law (i.e., military average of 2.00 in Law Center courses. call-up, Americans with Disabilities Act, etc.) or by grant of a waiver. Students seeking * The Law Center will accept for a waiver of the six-year requirement must transfer a maximum of 31 semester hours submit a written petition and supporting of academic credit. Georgetown Law does documentation to the Registrar as soon as not accept credit for externships, intern- their situation becomes apparent. Unless a ships or state-law courses. Credit earned in written waiver is granted, the six-year rule is courses offered in the Graduate Program strictly enforced. of Georgetown University or a Graduate Program at another institution does not ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS AND count toward the 54 Georgetown Law POLICIES credits required to graduate. Credit earned The Law Center reserves the right to change at study abroad programs (either George- academic requirements and the changes are town Law-sponsored programs or non reflected in the online version of the Bulletin Georgetown Law-sponsored programs) does

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 19 not count toward the 54 Georgetown Law Upperclass Legal Writing credits required to graduate. Credit earned Requirement at the Center for Transnational Legal Studies Students must complete the upperclass and credit earned at the Georgetown Law legal writing requirement as follows: (1) by London Summer Program does count toward successfully completing a seminar or clinic the 54 Georgetown Law credits required to designated as meeting the legal writing graduate. requirement, or (2) by completing a super- vised research project that has been approved ** Students who transfer to the Law by the Associate Dean for Academic Admin- Center from another law school are not istration. required to take nor are they admitted into The upperclass legal writing requirement the first-year J.D. elective or Criminal Justice. is intended to provide students with the Transfer students interested in applying for opportunity to refine research and writing certain clinics that require Criminal Justice skills learned in the first year, and to develop must take the 2-credit Criminal Procedure the skills necessary to undertake writing course. projects on their own following graduation from law school. Students choose topics, Students may not extend their program submit outlines, prepare and submit a first beyond the semester in which they have draft, and complete the final paper in consul- completed all academic requirements for the tation with faculty members in approved J.D. degree. seminars, clinics and supervised research In addition to the academic require- projects. ments, a J.D. diploma will not be issued until Through meeting the upperclass legal a student’s account balance has been paid in writing requirement, the student is to show full. Transcripts, diplomas, bar certificates, his or her mastery of the in-depth research and other educational certificates will not undertaken and demonstrate how the student be released if there is an outstanding student has organized, clarified, or advanced this account balance or a student who has body of knowledge in resolving the issues received financial aid has not fulfilled the raised by the paper. Final papers must be submitted to the Office of the Registrar, not federal requirement for a financial aid “exit to the professor, by the deadline announced interview.” The Law Center will not confer by the professor in the format specified on a J.D. degree on a student who is the subject the Registrar’s website. of a pending administrative or disciplinary The technical requirements for the action, as described in the Student Disci- upperclass legal writing requirement include: plinary Code, printed in the Conduct Policies (1) use of legal forms of citation (when section of this Bulletin. appropriate); (2) submission of an outline In meeting academic requirements, and a first draft, in accordance with the students should be aware of the following professor’s instructions and schedule; (3) academic regulations and policies of the Law submission of a revised final paper based Center. on the professor’s comments; and (4) both the first draft and the final paper of at least Required First-Year Program 6,000 words (excluding footnotes), which is Students must successfully complete the approximately 25 typewritten pages using required first-year program described in the customary margins and spacing. All work First-Year J.D. Curriculum section of this must be that of the student in consultation Bulletin. with the professor or must be cited for attribution to others.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 20 Juris Doctor Program

Supervised Research the principles set out below in reviewing a The faculty augments the Law Center’s student’s proposal: seminar offerings by providing a Supervised 1. The student must have at least the Research option, which students may required “C” average. undertake under the supervision of a faculty 2. The Associate Dean for Academic member for 2 academic credits. Supervised Administration will be receptive to proposals Research provides faculty guidance to meeting the goals of Supervised Research students in areas where there is no curricular and expects to approve most proposals for offering or where a student wishes to explore supervision by full-time faculty. a subject in greater depth than would be 3. Because the time demanded of the possible in an existing course or seminar. The professor is substantial, it is expected that professor and student establish a calendar of students ordinarily will seek sponsorship meetings that allows for the kind of interac- from full-time faculty. The academic deans tion contemplated for writing seminars. will help students identify possible faculty To be eligible for Supervised Research, sponsors. When no full-time faculty member a student must have at least a “C” average can serve as a sponsor, the Associate Dean (2.00) and must be sponsored by a faculty for Academic Administration may approve a member. If a student makes a good-faith proposal with an adjunct faculty sponsor. effort to obtain sponsorship by a full-time 4. A student ordinarily may not member and is unable to do so, sponsor- undertake Supervised Research more than ship by an adjunct faculty member may be once. (Students proposing to take Supervised approved. To be eligible to undertake a Research for a second time must disclose this Supervised Research project while enrolled on their application.) Similarly, Supervised at CTLS, the project must be approved by Research will not be approved when the Assistant Dean Scott Foster. proposal repeats work for which credit previ- To apply for Supervised Research, a ously has been granted in another course or student must complete an application form for which the student has been compensated and submit it to the Office of the Registrar during employment. Supervised Research by the deadline for the relevant semester (see credit cannot be awarded for internships or the Registrar’s website for details, at www. externships. law.georgetown.edu/registrar/). The applica- 5. Proposals may call for research to tion form requires that the student describe be completed in one semester or two; only 2 the topic for research; demonstrate why academic credits, however, can be awarded. the topic would lead to an original paper Final drafts of papers prepared for Super- satisfying the legal writing requirement; vised Research should be submitted in hard show the sponsoring professor’s agreement; copy to the Office of the Registrar. The paper indicate the scheduled meeting dates with the will be graded under the usual evaluation professor and the due dates for submission system by the sponsoring professor. Credit of the outline, first draft, and final draft; list for the upperclass writing requirement will the semester(s) in which the project is to be be given for papers receiving a passing grade. completed; and, if approval is sought for sponsorship by an adjunct faculty member, One Paper for Two Seminars describe the student’s efforts to obtain spon- Students may submit one paper to satisfy sorship by a full-time faculty member. To the requirements in two seminars or writing ensure that the proposals will be completed projects by securing the written approval of successfully, approval will be guided by both professors and the Registrar in advance

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 21 of writing the paper. When permission is FULL-TIME PROGRAM granted, the student will be required to write A full-time student must complete six semes- a paper of at least 12,000 words excluding ters in which he or she enrolls in a minimum footnotes (approximately 50 pages), and of 12 academic credits, and passes at least 10 meet all other requirements of both seminars. of these credits. After six full-time semesters, Students will be expected to indicate the joint a student achieves the required time in resi- nature of the paper on the cover page of all dence needed to graduate. A full-time student submissions. Each professor approving such who fails to pass at least 10 academic credits a project independently will submit a final in a given semester will not have successfully grade indicating his or her judgment of the completed that full-time semester and will paper as it pertains to his or her course, and need to attend a Summer session or a seventh the final grades given for the two seminars semester in order to meet the residency need not be identical. requirement. Students may not submit a single paper Full-time students may not advance the for a seminar and a Supervised Research date of their graduation by taking classes Project. Students also may not submit a during a Summer session. single paper to satisfy the requirements of A full-time student should consult with two Supervised Research Projects. the Registrar if he or she does not success- fully complete a minimum of 10 academic Professional Responsibility credits during any semester. Requirement PART-TIME PROGRAM Each student must successfully complete A part-time student can achieve the required an upperclass course meeting the Profes- time in residence in either of two ways: sional Responsibility requirement. The following courses satisfy the Professional 1. Eight Semesters: Responsibility requirement: American A part-time student can meet the residency Legal Profession; Comparative Professional requirement upon the completion of eight Responsibility (offered at the Georgetown semesters in which he or she successfully Law London Summer Program); Professional completes a minimum of 8 academic credits. Responsibility; Professional Responsibility A part-time student who fails to pass at and the Future of the Legal Profession; least 8 academic credits in a given semester Professional Responsibility in Law Firm and will need to attend a Summer session or a Corporate Practice; and Professional Respon- ninth semester in order to meet the residency sibility: Ethics in Public Interest Practice. J.D. requirement. students will not satisfy their Professional Responsibility requirement by completing 2. Seven Semesters and at Least Two Professional Responsibility courses offered in Summer Sessions: the Graduate Program. A part-time student can meet the residency requirement upon the completion of seven Required Time in Residence part-time semesters and at least a total of 8 (Residency Requirement) academic credits over two or more Summer In addition to all other degree requirements, sessions. A part-time student who fails to students must complete the required time in pass at least 8 academic credits in a given residence. semester will need to attend one or more additional semesters or Summer sessions in order to achieve the required time in resi- dence.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 22 Juris Doctor Program

A part-time student should consult with the full-time program subsequently need to the Registrar if he or she does not complete a take four full-time semesters plus at least 6 minimum of 8 credits during any semester. credits of Summer course work. Part-time students who wish to accel- Students who transfer to the full-time erate their graduation in this manner should program upon completion of their first year consult with the Registrar to make sure that must pay a tuition equalization fee. (See they will be able to meet all degree require- Tuition and Fees.) Part-time students who ments under the accelerated program. transfer to the full-time program and pay the tuition equalization charge are entitled TRANSFER STUDENTS FROM OTHER to take up to 7 credits in any Georgetown LAW SCHOOLS Law Summer program in DC or London Students who transfer from other law without paying additional tuition. Summer schools must complete the equivalent of courses not taken at the Law Center or at the four full-time semesters of residence at the Georgetown Law London Summer Program Law Center. Transfer students who are are not covered by the tuition equalization admitted to the full-time program can fulfill fee. their remaining residency requirement by Students with financial aid concerns should discuss the application procedures completing four additional full-time semes- and award policies with the Office of ters at the Law Center, in accordance with Financial Aid to learn what funds might be the provisions set forth above. For transfer available. Scholarship funding for upperclass students who are admitted to the part-time aid applicants is extremely limited because program, the remaining Law Center resi- awards are made on a three-year basis to dency requirement will depend on the value entering students. of the residency earned at the student’s prior Students seeking to transfer at times law school. Therefore, transfer students other than the end of the first year must admitted to the part-time program will need submit a request in writing to the Registrar. to consult with the Registrar to determine The request must include a statement of how they can fulfill their remaining Law the student’s compelling personal need to Center residency requirement. transfer. A student may not transfer from the Transfer Between Full-Time and full-time program to the part-time program Part-Time Programs in the student’s sixth semester. Attendance First-year part-time students who wish to at Summer sessions does not constitute a transfer to the full-time program must apply basis for a transfer. In addition, a student to the Registrar by March 15 of their first may not transfer to the full-time program year at the Law Center. (At the beginning in a semester in which the student receives of the Spring semester, first-year part-time tuition benefits as an employee of George- town University, including the Law Center. students will receive information from the Students who have questions concerning a Office of the Registrar about the process for transfer between programs should consult applying to transfer.) The Law Center may with the Registrar to ascertain the required limit the number of interdivisional transfers. periods of attendance and the earliest date Students must complete all first-year courses, upon which graduation may occur as a result including those normally taken in the second of a transfer. year by part-time students, in the program Note: Part-time students who transfer to the in which they began. To meet the residency full-time program after their second year will requirement and graduate after two more continue to pay tuition on a per-credit basis. years of law studies, students who transfer to

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 23

Specific Requirements for ACADEMIC EVALUATION AND Students on Non-Immigrant ATTRITION STANDARDS Visas By provision of Federal law, any school Academic Evaluation System that enrolls foreign nationals is required to The Law Center’s faculty awards the grades comply with strict reporting requirements. of A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-, D and F. Some Before the start of each semester, all newly courses available to upperclass students are enrolled international students (including graded under the Pass/Fail Option described U.S. permanent residents) at the Law Center below. are required to provide documentation In the clinical programs, the graduate proving they are legally permitted to be in fellows also participate in the grading the country and attend school. Students in process. Each student’s grade point average is F-1 or J-1 status are additionally required to computed at the end of each semester. attend a Visa Information Session given by the Graduate Programs Office. The Graduate Students Auditing Courses Programs Office will provide all new inter- Enrolled degree students may audit addi- national students with detailed information tional courses, with the permission of the concerning the time, date and location of the professors. Auditors receive no transcript session prior to the start of the semester. Visa notation of their attendance in class. and regulatory information is also available at the Graduate Program’s website at: www. Grading System law.georgetown.edu/intl/visa.html. The following numerical equivalents are assigned to each letter grade: Note: Foreign national students who fail A 4.00 C+ 2.33 to provide documentation of a valid non- A- 3.67 C 2.00 immigrant status permitting study at a U.S. B+ 3.33 C- 1.67 university prior to the start of classes will B 3.00 D 1.00 not be permitted to complete registration B- 2.67 F 0 or attend classes. For further information, A student’s cumulative grade point average please contact the Graduate Programs is computed by multiplying the numerical Office by calling Indira Marin Dingledine, equivalent of each letter grade by the credit Visa Coordinator at (202) 662-9319 and/or value of the course, adding the results e-mail your immigration related questions to together, and then dividing the total by the [email protected]. total number of credits. In computing a student’s average, computations are carried Note: Due to U.S. visa regulations, to two decimal places. international students who wish to withdraw While the cumulative grade point from any course or from the Law Center average is based upon all the student’s must obtain approval from the Visa Advisor Law Center grades, the annual grade point in the Office of Graduate Programs in average is based only upon a student’s Law addition to obtaining approval to withdraw Center grades for one academic year. The from the Registrar or an Academic Advisor. academic year begins with the Summer term and ends with the following Spring semester. In calculating the student’s cumulative grade point average, the Law Center will include the academic credits for any course the

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 24 Juris Doctor Program student has failed, even when the student has vised Research projects; (2) clinics, except successfully retaken the course. for Street Law: Community; (3) Law Center The grading processes for examination graduate courses which are not cross-listed; courses are anonymous and are designed and (4) courses where the faculty member to be as fair as possible. Faculty are asked has elected not to make a course available to submit grades approximately four weeks for the Pass/Fail option. after the end of an examination period. All other courses may be available for Students may access their grades through the Pass/Fail option. The Office of the Regis- MyAccess. Grades will not be released for trar posts a list of the courses not eligible any student who has an outstanding student for the Pass/Fail option for each semester account balance. The Law Center will not on its website (www.law.georgetown.edu/ release grades over the telephone, even to registrar/). the student, because of concern for students’ privacy. OTHER RESTRICTIONS Grades for courses taken at other law Students may only take 6 credits pass/fail schools are not listed on the Law Center and only exercise the option in one course transcript and not included in the computa- per semester. Exceptions to these two rules tion of the student’s Law Center cumulative are located on the Office of the Registrar grade point average. Grades for courses website, under the “J.D. Pass/Fail Option” taken at the Center for Transnational Legal link, at: www.law.georgetown.edu/registrar/. Studies are listed on the Law Center tran- script but not included in the computation of GRADING the student’s Law Center cumulative grade A student must decide whether to use the point average. (See Graduation Honors Pass/Fail option and designate to the Office Policy for Transfer/Visitor Students.) of the Registrar the Pass/Fail course during the first two weeks of the relevant semester. Pass/Fail Option By the end of the sixth week, the student In order to encourage students to be more must designate to the Registrar’s Office the adventurous in their curricular choices, the target grade the student hopes to receive. faculty adopted the following limited Pass/ Students sign up for the Pass/Fail option Fail option. online and receive instructions on how to do so from the Office of the Registrar. ELIGIBLE STUDENTS Faculty are not informed of who is Upperclass J.D. students are eligible to use taking their course on a Pass/Fail basis. If the Pass/Fail option for upperclass electives the student earns the target grade or above, and cross-listed Law Center graduate courses the actual grade will appear on the student’s that are available for Pass/Fail. The option is transcript. If the student earns a grade below not available to first-year J.D. students. The the target but at least a grade of C, a pass Pass/Fail option is not available to LL.M. will appear on the transcript. If the student students. earns a grade of C- or lower, the actual grade will appear on the transcript. Whether ELIGIBLE COURSES a student receives a pass or the grade, the The following courses are not eligible for academic credits associated with the course the Pass/Fail option: (1) all required courses: will count toward the 6-credit limit. If a first-year courses, including the first-year student withdraws from a course taken on a elective; any course that meets the Profes- Pass/Fail basis, the academic credits associ- sional Responsibility requirement; and ated with the course will count toward the Writing Requirement seminars and Super- 6-credit limit.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 25

Academic Honors students consists of the students whose The Law Center does not rank its students. annual cumulative grade point averages place The faculty has, however, authorized three them in the top one-third of their particular separate academic honors for students with first-year section after the Spring semester. distinguished academic records. The upperclass Dean’s List is calculated separately in two groups. The first group DEAN’S LIST consists of students in their final year of law J.D. students whose annual cumulative school; that is, third year full-time students grade point averages place them in the top and fourth year part-time students. The one-third of their class at the Law Center second group consists of all other upperclass will have their transcripts marked “Dean’s students, that is, second-year full-time List” for the appropriate academic year. students and second- and third-year part- All candidates for the J.D. degree at the time students. Law Center are eligible for the Dean’s List provided they completed, during the DIPLOMAS WITH HONORS academic year, at least 24 credits at the Law Students who meet the academic standards Center if enrolled in the full-time program set by the faculty may be awarded the J.D. or 16 credits at the Law Center if enrolled in degree with honors and their diplomas will the part-time program. Students who transfer be marked cum laude, magna cum laude, or from one program to the other during an summa cum laude, as appropriate. academic year must earn a minimum of 12 The degree cum laude is awarded to credits in the semester in which they are a students whose cumulative grade point full-time student, and a minimum of 8 credits averages place them in the top one-third of for the semester in which they are a part-time those graduating, and the degree magna cum student, to be eligible for Dean’s List. Joint laude, to the top 10%. degree students, concurrent degree students, The J.D. degree summa cum laude is the and students who study abroad during one highest academic honor that the faculty can semester of the academic year are eligible bestow upon a graduating student. There is for Dean’s List recognition, based solely on no cumulative grade point average that auto- their J.D. courses, if they complete at least matically entitles a student to that honor. 16 graded J.D. credits during the academic Instead, the J.D. degree summa cum laude is year and maintain full-time status in their granted at the sole discretion of the faculty. joint or concurrent degree program. Students To be eligible for consideration for the award earning fewer than the minimum number of of summa cum laude, a graduate must have credits are not eligible for the Dean’s List in completed at least 71 credits at the Law the academic year in question. Courses taken Center and have a minimum cumulative at the Law Center in the preceding Summer grade point average of 3.70. session or in the Graduate Program at the For the purpose of calculating students’ Law Center are included in the calculation of eligibility for degrees with honors, students the required minimum number of credits for graduating in October will be included with Dean’s List eligibility. the class that graduated the previous May. Dean’s List eligibility is computed Students who graduate in February will separately for first-year students, upperclass, be included with the class graduating the and graduating students, as follows. For the following May. first-year class, the Dean’s List is calculated separately for each of the five first-year sections. The Dean’s List for first-year

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 26 Juris Doctor Program

GRADUATION HONORS POLICY FOR required first-year elective) in which TRANSFER/VISITOR STUDENTS he or she received a grade of F. In the Graduation honors for students who transfer case of a first-year elective, a student to Georgetown Law after their first year of who fails the course may repeat that law school or for students who visit another elective or substitute another first-year institution will be based solely on grades elective. Both the original grade of F earned at the Law Center. This policy applies and whatever grade the student receives only to magna cum laude and cum laude upon retaking the course will appear on graduation honors. To be eligible for consid- the student’s transcript. The Registrar eration for the award of summa cum laude, will include the grades and the academic a graduate must have completed at least 71 credits for both times the student took credits at the Law Center. the course in calculating the student’s cumulative grade point average for ORDER OF THE COIF, GEORGETOWN purposes of honors, attrition and gradu- CHAPTER ation. The Order of the Coif was established in 2. When a student has completed the first 1912 to recognize graduating students who year with a cumulative grade point achieved an exemplary cumulative grade average of less than 1.67, the student point average. Graduating students whose must retake any course in which he or cumulative grade point averages place them she received a grade of D or F. Both the in the top 10% of the class are elected to D’s and F’s the student first received and membership in the Order, the national law the grade he or she receives in retaking school honor society for the encouragement the course will appear on the student’s of scholarship and advancement of ethical transcript, and the credits for both the standards in the legal profession. first and retaken courses will be included in calculating the student’s cumulative Academic Attrition grade point average for purposes of Unless excused by operation of law (i.e., honors, attrition and graduation. The military call-up, Americans with Disabilities student will receive credit only for the Act, etc.) or by grant of a waiver, a full-time courses he or she successfully retakes. If, student must satisfy all graduation require- in retaking a course, a student receives a ments within five consecutive calendar years; grade of D, the student has satisfied the a part-time student, within six consecutive requirement that he or she pass every calendar years. If the student fails to satisfy required and first-year elective course. the graduation requirements within the 3. A first-year student whose cumulative appropriate time period, he or she will be grade point average is less than 1.67 dismissed with no possibility of readmission but 1.33 or higher must take a leave of or graduation. absence from the Law Center for one calendar year. In order to return, the FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS student must submit a written petition to 1. A student must successfully complete the Registrar no later than August 1 for every first-year required course and a the following Fall semester. The petition first-year elective course (this includes will be considered by the Associate those required courses taken in the Dean for Academic Administration. second year by students in the part-time The student will be allowed to return program). A student must retake any only if the Associate Dean for Academic first-year required course (including the Administration finds that it is probable

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 27

that the student will be able to attain a the student to improve his or her perfor- cumulative grade point average of 2.00 mance. and satisfy all graduation requirements within the allotted time period. SUMMER SESSION ATTENDANCE 4. A first-year student whose cumulative If a student is enrolled in a Law Center grade point average is less than 1.33 will Summer session when a failure to maintain be withdrawn for academic insufficiency, the required minimum cumulative grade with the right to apply for readmission point average is determined, that student after one full year. Readmission is not may elect to continue in the Summer session, guaranteed. To seek readmission after and the student’s cumulative grade point one year, the student must submit a average will be recalculated taking the written petition to the Registrar no later Summer session grades into account. If such than August 1 for the following Fall a student has secured approval to attend semester. The petition will be considered the Summer session at another law school, by the Associate Dean for Academic that school will be notified of the student’s Administration. The student will be academic dismissal from the Law Center. allowed to return only if the Associate Dean for Academic Administration PROVISIONS FOR READMISSION OF finds that it is probable that the student WITHDRAWN STUDENTS will be able to attain a cumulative Students withdrawn for academic insuf- grade point average of 2.00 and satisfy ficiency after their first year may reapply for all graduation requirements within admission after one full year. Readmission the allotted time period. Petitions by is not guaranteed. To seek readmission students who have been absent from the after one year, the student must submit a rolls for more than one year under the written petition to the Registrar no later than circumstances of this subsection will be August 1 for the following Fall semester. The governed by Provisions for Readmission petition will be considered by the Associate of Withdrawn Students, below. Dean for Academic Administration. The student will be allowed to return only if the UPPERCLASS STUDENTS Associate Dean for Academic Administration A student no longer in his or her first finds that it is probable that the student will academic year at the Law Center and any be able to attain a cumulative grade point transfer student will be withdrawn from the average of 2.00 and satisfy all graduation Law Center for academic insufficiency if at requirements within the allotted time period. the end of any academic year he or she has a The provisions for readmission outlined cumulative grade point average of less than in this section apply to upperclass students 1.67. For a transfer student, only Law Center and to first-year students who, after failing grades will be counted. (See Provisions for to secure the required minimum cumulative Readmission of Withdrawn Students, below.) grade point average of 1.67 at the end of any academic year, fail to re-enroll during the COUNSELING REQUIREMENT FOR prescribed time period. CERTAIN STUDENTS A student who has a cumulative grade point average of less than 2.50 at the end of any semester must meet with an Academic Advisor or the Registrar to discuss the requirements for graduation and ways for

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 28 Juris Doctor Program

Attendance, Examinations and experiences a serious medical or personal Written Work situation that makes it impossible to take an examination on the scheduled date, it is ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION the student’s responsibility to determine, in The Law Center must be satisfied at all times consultation with the Registrar, whether he of the serious purpose of each student. Any or she should request a deferred examina- student will be withdrawn if it is found that tion. (See the Exam Deferral Policy in the the student is not giving proper time and General Administrative Policies section of attention to his or her studies. this Bulletin.) Regular and punctual attendance at all A student failing to appear for any class sessions is required of each student. examination because of illness or other Student participation is expected in all extraordinary cause must contact the Regis- courses. A student who, even though regis- trar prior to the start of the examination. tered for a course, has not regularly attended If the Registrar is satisfied that the absence and participated may, at the professor’s is legitimate and supported by appropriate option, be withdrawn, excluded from the documentation (such as a doctor’s note), course or examination (with the same conse- permission may be given for the student quences as a voluntary failure to appear for a to take a deferred examination. The final examination) or receive a lowered grade requirements of a full-time J.D. student’s in the course. Even if a student has passed employment will not be regarded as an all examinations, credit will not be awarded “extraordinary cause.” If the Registrar does and no student will be advanced, nor will his not permit a deferral, the student must take or her degree be conferred, if attendance or the examination as originally scheduled or be participation is unsatisfactory. withdrawn from the course. A student who has not properly regis- Any student who does not take an tered for a course may not take the final examination as originally scheduled, and examination or receive any credit for partici- who does not obtain permission from the pation in the course. Registrar prior to the start of an examina- tion to take a deferred examination, will be EXAMINATIONS withdrawn from the course. The withdrawal Written examinations are held at the end of will be reflected as a “W” on the student’s the classwork in all courses unless otherwise transcript. A student who presents himself indicated on the course schedule. No exami- or herself for examination in a course but nation will be given prior to its originally fails to submit that examination for grading scheduled date. Curricular offerings desig- will receive a grade of F for that course. No nated as “seminars” generally do not have post-examination relief will be granted. If a examinations; instead, substantial written student becomes ill during the examination, work is required. Clinical programs do not the student must immediately make the have written final examinations. proctor aware of the situation and follow the The Law Center requires students to take instructions of the proctor or Registrar. their examinations at the regularly sched- No re-examination will be given in any uled time. Dates for all examinations are course for the purpose of raising a grade announced at the time the course schedule obtained in a previous final examination in is released so that students may anticipate that course. the date of their examinations and schedule Students may review their graded exams personal and employment commitments so during specified exam review periods by as not to interfere with the announced dates completing a request form at the Office of of their examinations. If, however, a student the Registrar. The Library collects copies

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 29 of past examinations administered at the Note to International Students: U.S. visa Law Center. Students may use these prior restrictions dictate that extending the paper examinations as study aids in preparing due date beyond the expected date of gradu- for examinations. In many cases, model or ation as listed in the certificate of eligibility “best” answers to past examinations are (I-20 or DS-2019 form) can be permitted also on file in the Library. For exams prior only for compelling academic and/or medical to 1998, hard copies are available through reasons. Any such paper extension must be the reference desk. Exams administered from approved in writing by the Visa Coordi- 1998 to the present are available online on nator in the Office of Graduate Programs the Library’s website (www.ll.georgetown. in consultation with the Associate Dean of edu/services/exams.cfm). Graduate Programs in advance of the paper submission deadline. The faculty member WRITTEN WORK must agree to the extension but cannot grant Final papers in seminars and other courses the extension. are due on the date announced in the academic calendar. By announcement at the REVIEW PROCESS FOR A PASSING beginning of the semester, a professor may GRADE advance or extend for up to a maximum Once a grade is reported to the Registrar, a of 60 days in the Fall semester and 45 days faculty member may change a grade for an in the Spring semester the due date of all examination, seminar or research paper, or papers for the seminar (except for those of clinic only upon written proof of demon- graduating students). All final papers must be strable clerical error in the grading or grade submitted to the Office of the Registrar, not reporting process. to the professor, by the deadline announced by the professor in the format specified on REVIEW PROCESS FOR A FAILING GRADE the Registrar’s website. Any student who has received a failing grade Due dates for papers are as firm as the on an examination or paper may, after first dates of examinations. Individual extensions discussing the matter with the professor who for fewer than the maximum allowable days reported the failing grade, request that the (mentioned above) may be granted by the Registrar submit that examination or paper professor, provided the student submits an to another professor teaching in the subject Individual Extension Form to the Office for evaluation. Students receiving a failing of the Registrar. The form, available at the grade in a clinic may request a conference Office of the Registrar and online, must be with the Associate or Assistant Dean for signed by the professor. Extensions for more Clinical Programs to discuss the evaluation, than the maximum are rare and not granted once they have discussed their grade with solely by the professor. Any request for an the professor offering the clinic. The other extension beyond the maximum is effec- professor, or the Associate or Assistant Dean tive only upon review and approval of the for Clinical Programs in the case of a clinical Individual Extension Form by the Associate grade, serves merely in a consulting capacity. Dean for Academic Administration. Final decision for the course grade rests If a student fails to submit a final paper with the professor conducting the course, by the due date (including any extension), but the course professor shall give due and the student will be withdrawn from the appropriate consideration to the views of seminar. The withdrawal will be reflected as the consulting colleague. A request for such a “W” on the student’s transcript. Once a evaluation must be made by the student final paper is submitted for grading, a revised within 14 days after the grade is posted. version of that paper may not be substituted for the final paper.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 30 Juris Doctor Program

Credit for Summer Session Credit for Study Abroad Study Programs During the Academic Year SUMMER STUDY AT THE LAW CENTER Except as expressly modified in the Summer CENTER FOR TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL Session Brochure, all academic regulations STUDIES applicable during the regular academic year Georgetown Law established the Center are applicable during Summer sessions. for Transnational Legal Studies (“CTLS”) Students in good standing at the Law Center in London beginning with the Fall 2008 may enroll in Summer session courses at semester. CTLS is a collaborative project the Law Center and earn credit toward that brings together students and faculty their degree requirements. Non-degree J.D. from law schools around the world to study students in good standing at other ABA- complex transnational legal issues from accredited law schools may enroll in J.D. different perspectives. Collaborating schools courses in the Summer session at George- include institutions from Australia, Brazil, town Law as space permits. The policies and Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, procedures for non-degree J.D. students to Israel, Italy, Japan, Singapore, Spain, and apply for permission to enroll in Summer Switzerland. Upperclass Georgetown Law session courses are explained in the Summer students will spend a semester with their Session Brochure. counterparts from the other law schools in The Law Center will accept up to 7 courses taught and co-taught by faculty from credits earned during the Summer session at both the common law and civil law tradi- the Law Center. tions. Enrollment in CTLS is open to J.D. Full-time students may not advance students who have completed their first year the date of their graduation by attending of study. Preference will be given to students Summer session courses. entering their third year (full-time students) or fourth year (part-time students). More SUMMER SESSION - GEORGETOWN LAW detailed information on eligibility and the LONDON PROGRAM application process is available through the The Law Center offers a summer program in Center’s website at http://ctls.georgetown.edu London, England. Course demands are the same as for courses taught at the Law Center, or by contacting Scott Foster, Assistant Dean and admission is competitive, with priority and Administrative Director for the Center given to Georgetown students. for Transnational Legal Studies, at foster@ For further information, contact: law.georgetown.edu. Cara Morris Students may apply for one semester Deputy Director, Transnational at CTLS and may only transfer in up to Programs a total of 14 credits from CTLS towards Georgetown University Law Center their J.D. degree requirements. Students can 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW do either a semester at CTLS or another Washington, DC 20001-2075 Georgetown Law Semester Abroad Program, Phone: (202) 662-9860 but not both. Students may do a Summer Fax: (202) 662-4038 study abroad program and CTLS, but may E-mail: [email protected] only transfer in a total of 14 credits with For information on credit for Summer the exception of the Georgetown Law sessions offered in the U.S. and abroad (non- Summer London Program. For example, if Georgetown Law), see section on Credit for a student has already taken 4 credits at a Study Outside the Law Center, below. non-Georgetown Law Summer study abroad

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 31 program, the student could only transfer in • Torcuato di Tella University, Buenos 10 credits from CTLS. All interdivisional Aires, Argentina transfer students and students who transfer • Tsinghua University, Beijing, China into Georgetown Law from another law • University of Leiden, Leiden, the Neth- school must complete all first year course erlands requirements before being eligible to study • The Hebrew University of Jerusalem in at CTLS. Credits earned at CTLS will count Israel toward the 54 Georgetown Law credits Students can also apply for the year-long required to graduate but will not count into program in Paris at the Institut d’Études a student’s grade point average. If a CTLS Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po) and Paris I course is offered on a mandatory pass/fail (part of the Sorbonne). This program awards basis, the credits will not count against the a Master’s in Global Business Law. Fourteen 6-credit pass/fail limit. of the credits earned through this program will also transfer to the J.D. degree. This GEORGETOWN LAW SEMESTER program requires that the student complete ABROAD PROGRAM an additional semester at Georgetown Law The Georgetown Law Semester Abroad (for which additional tuition is not charged). Program arranges for students to study The full-year Global Business Law Program abroad for a semester at one of several at Sciences Po in Paris is open only to full- outstanding law schools. These semester time J.D. students entering their third year abroad programs are open to J.D. students at the Law Center and part-time students who have completed their first year of study. entering their fourth year. Please note that Preference will be given to students entering some programs involve courses taught in a their third year. Part-time students who language other than English. have completed the full first-year curriculum Students may only transfer in up to (including Criminal Justice and the first-year a total of 14 credits from a Georgetown elective”) are eligible. Students participating sponsored semester abroad toward their in the semester abroad programs sponsored J.D. degree requirements. Students may by Georgetown Law can receive up to do a summer study abroad program and 14 credits. An exception to the 11 credit a semester abroad through a Georgetown maximum will be granted to part-time sponsored program, but may only transfer in students. For information on the policy a total of 14 credits with the exception of the governing academic and graduating honors Georgetown London Program. For example, for students who visit at other schools, see if a student has already taken 4 credits at Graduation Honors Policy for Transfer/ a non-Georgetown summer study abroad Visitor Students, above. program, the student could only transfer in For the Fall 2009 semester, the following 10 credits from any Georgetown sponsored foreign law schools are part of the George- program. All interdivisional transfer students town Law-sponsored semester abroad and students who transfer into Georgetown program: Law from another law school must complete • Bucerius Law School, Hamburg, all first year course requirements before Germany being eligible to study abroad. • ESADE Law School, Barcelona, Spain Credits earned at a Georgetown spon- • National Law School of India University sored program (with the exception of the in Bangalore (NLS) CTLS and the London Summer Program) • National University of Singapore School will not count toward the 54 Georgetown of Law (NUS), Singapore Law credits required to graduate and will not

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 32 Juris Doctor Program affect a student’s grade point average. may be taken on a space-available basis, but In order to be eligible to participate will not be credited towards the J.D. degree. in the semester abroad program, transfer Full-time students may take graduate courses students must complete 54 credits in three and undergraduate courses during the Fall full-time semesters at the Law Center and and Spring semesters without additional one Summer session (the Summer session charge. Part-time students pay for all courses may be taken at the Law Center or at the at the applicable Law Center credit hour Georgetown Law London Program). Transfer rate. Full-time or part-time students taking students considering this option should courses in a Main Campus Summer session consult an Academic Advisor in the Office of are billed at the applicable Main Campus J.D. Academic Services. The Transnational tuition rate. All courses, credits and grades Programs website provides important addi- taken in the Undergraduate or a Graduate tional information about the Georgetown School will appear on the student’s Law Law Semester Abroad Program at: www.law. Center transcript, but the grades will not be georgetown.edu/otp/semesterabroad.htm. counted in the student’s grade point average. Important Note: As of the date of this It is the student’s responsibility to make sure document, Semester Abroad policies are the official transcript of grades and a degree undergoing review and revision. Students application are submitted to the Registrar by are responsible for consulting the Office of the Law Center grades deadline. Transnational Programs webpage to learn of During Main Campus add/drop period any changes that may affect their planning. (Note: dates may differ from the Law Center’s add/drop period), students must: Credit for Courses in the Law (1) obtain written approval (e-mail is suffi- Center Graduate Programs cient) from the Main Campus instructor; (2) Upperclass students may take up to 6 credits forward the instructor’s written permission of courses in the Graduate Programs of the to the Senior Assistant Dean, J.D. Program; Law Center without permission. Permission (3) upon approval, the Senior Assistant from an Academic Advisor in the Office of Dean, J.D. Program will forward your J.D. Academic Services is required, however, request to the Law Center’s Office of the to take more than 6 credits of Graduate Registrar. The Registrar’s Office will forward Program offerings. Grades for Law Center your request at the beginning of the Main graduate courses and seminars are displayed Campus add/drop period to the appropriate on students’ transcripts and computed into academic department for approval to enroll students’ grade point averages. you in the course.

Credit for Courses in the Note: Law students register for Main Undergraduate or Graduate Campus courses on a seat available basis. Main Campus students have priority for Schools of the University these courses. Law Center students are not Upperclass students may take a maximum permitted to register for the Main Campus of 6 credits in the Graduate School of the side of cross-listed courses. Law Center University. Students must obtain the permis- students who wish to be enrolled in a Main sion of both the Senior Assistant Dean, J.D. Campus cross-listed course must follow the Program, and the professor teaching the Law Center’s add/drop/waitlist process. graduate course. Course descriptions may be found in the Graduate School Catalogue. Language classes and undergraduate courses

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 33

Credit for Study Outside the Academic Evaluation and Attrition Law Center Standards, for the rules that govern how courses taken at other schools affect GENERAL PROVISIONS academic evaluation and attrition and Credit for courses taken outside the Law academic and graduation honors. Center’s J.D. or Graduate Programs is given • No credit is given for internships or under the circumstances described below. externships offered at other institutions. Students should be aware of the following academic policies that apply to transfer of VISITING AT ANOTHER LAW SCHOOL credit from another division of the University In extraordinary circumstances, a student or another institution. may be granted permission to attend • Students considering taking classes and another ABA-approved law school for transferring credit from other ABA- one or two semesters in a student’s final approved law schools must consult with year of law school, while still earning the the Senior Assistant Dean, J.D. Program Georgetown Law degree. Before applying to be advised of all applicable rules to another school, the student must obtain and necessary procedures and to obtain permission from the Senior Assistant Dean, approval for the course work. Students J.D. Program. Permission to visit away is must have a compelling reason to request granted only to students showing compelling permission to take a course at another personal circumstances that require their law school in the Washington, D.C., area relocation. during a semester in which the student The Law Center reserves the right to is enrolled at the Law Center. The Law designate the schools to which a student may Center will accept no more than 6 credits apply, to approve the student’s selection of in this situation and the courses must be courses, and to limit the number of students approved prior to the student’s enroll- to whom permission to visit is granted. In ment at the other law school. order to visit another law school, students • Under certain circumstances credit must submit their request, in writing, to the for clinical programs will not transfer. Senior Assistant Dean, J.D. Program by Students contemplating taking a clinical April 1. course at another ABA-approved law Students will not be permitted to school must consult the Associate or visit at another school unless they are in Assistant Dean for Clinical Programs good standing at Georgetown Law for the before enrolling in the course. semester(s) for which they wish to visit away. • A minimum of 54 credits must be earned Georgetown Law students who wish to at the Law Center. visit at another school must have earned the • A passing grade is required for transfer minimum 2.00 grade point average required of any credits from another school for graduation before permission to visit toward the degree requirements at the away will be given, since grades earned at Law Center. other schools will not be calculated into a • All approved credits undertaken at student’s grade point average. A student with another ABA-approved law school will an unpaid student account balance will not be displayed on the student’s Law Center be approved to visit away until the student’s transcript. These grades are not included account is paid in full. There is an admin- in the student’s Law Center cumulative istrative fee of $200.00 for each semester a grade point average. student visits at another school. • Please refer to the preceding section, It is the student’s responsibility to make

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 34 Juris Doctor Program sure the official transcript of grades and STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMS DURING a degree application are submitted to the THE ACADEMIC YEAR (NON- Registrar by the Law Center grades deadline. GEORGETOWN LAW) Students who petition to visit at another While enrolled at the Law Center, students ABA-approved law school during their final may earn a limited number of credits at year of study are cautioned that grades not study abroad programs conducted by other received by the Law Center’s grades deadline ABA-approved law schools. will affect graduation clearance. There are a limited number of law Students requesting to visit away must schools that sponsor study abroad programs complete a degree audit with the Senior during the Fall or Spring semesters. A list can Assistant Dean for J.D. Program to assure be obtained from the ABA’s website, ABAnet. that they can meet all degree requirements. org (www.abanet.org/legaled/studyabroad/ Students must complete the upperclass legal abroad.html). The Law Center will accept no writing requirement at the Law Center. more than 12 credits from non-Georgetown Students visiting at another law school sponsored study abroad programs. Students must carry private medical insurance, be may do a non-Georgetown summer study covered by a student policy at the visited abroad program and a non-Georgetown school, or purchase medical insurance semester abroad program but may only provided by Georgetown University. transfer in a total of 12 credits. For example, For information on the policy governing if a student takes 4 credits at a non-George- academic and graduating honors for students town summer study abroad program, the who visit at other schools, see Graduation student could expect to transfer in only 8 Honors Policy for Transfer/Visitor Students, credits from any non-Georgetown sponsored above. semester abroad program. The general provisions described above SUMMER SESSIONS (NON- regarding visiting at another law school GEORGETOWN LAW) apply to these programs. The Law Center will accept up to 7 academic Permission to apply to a study abroad credits at a Summer session of another ABA- program (other than those sponsored by approved law school, if the courses taken are the Law Center) must be obtained from the approved in advance by the Senior Assistant Office of Transnational Programs prior to Dean, J.D. Program. Students must send a applying. The Law Center reserves the right written request to the Senior Assistant Dean to designate the schools to which a student indicating the school they wish to attend may apply and to approve the student’s selec- and the course(s) (including the number of tion of courses. The Law Center does not credits) they wish to take. Students must give credit for clinical work or externships have a compelling reason in order to attend a done abroad. Summer session at another law school in the Important Note: As of the date of this Washington, D.C. area. document, Semester Abroad policies are undergoing review and revision. Students are SUMMER ABROAD PROGRAMS AT responsible for consulting with the Office of OTHER LAW SCHOOLS Transnational Programs webpage to learn of The Law Center will accept up to 4 credits any changes that may affect their planning taken at a non-Georgetown Law Summer (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/otp/). Abroad program with the permission of the Office of Transnational Programs.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 35

CREDIT FOR WORK COMPLETED AT in participating in the externship program OTHER GRADUATE SCHOOLS PRIOR TO are encouraged to contact the program MATRICULATION coordinator and the Office of Public Interest The Law Center will not grant credit for any and Community Service for placement course work completed prior to a student’s suggestions. matriculation in a J.D. program at an Externs are required to attend an orien- American Bar Association (ABA)-approved tation class in the first week of the semester law school. This includes law courses taken and at least one additional class or meeting at law schools. with the program coordinator mid-semester. Students are then required to devote a Externship Program minimum of 10 hours per week for at least The Law Center provides J.D. students an 11 weeks to the externship. Students must opportunity to receive 2 credits for participa- keep weekly time records that reflect the tion in its externship program. Students are number of hours the student has worked and graded on a pass/fail basis and the credits describe the nature of the work performed count toward the total number of pass/fail without disclosing any confidential informa- credits that a student may take at the Law tion. At the end of the semester, the student Center. Students may exercise the pass/fail will be required to submit a 5- to 10-page option for another course during the same paper reflecting on the externship experience. semester in which they participate in an Students will be enrolled on a first-come, externship. first-served basis, with a total enrollment Students may enroll after earning 28 of no more than 60 per semester. Eligible credit hours. Externships may be in govern- students will be enrolled when they secure ment, judicial or public interest offices. an externship and submit a notification of Students may not combine for-credit and placement form for a placement that meets paid work at the externship. Students must the criteria set forth above. The signed super- have completed or be enrolled in an upper- vision agreement must be submitted by the class course that relates to the substantive start of the semester. The forms are available work of the placement. The work must be on the Registrar’s webpage. legal in nature and a lawyer must supervise the student extern. Students may not concur- Certificate Programs rently participate in any clinic other than J.D. students may be awarded only one Street Law and an externship. Students who certificate from among the certificate take Street Law and do an externship in the programs available to them. Any student same semester are expected to prioritize their who has satisfied the requirements for more obligations to the clinic first and to manage than one certificate will be asked to designate their time in accordance with these priorities. the certificate he or she would like to receive. Students may not enroll in an externship concurrently with an experiential learning course, except where noted in the eligibility Student-Initiated Seminar section of the Externship webpage at www. Students who wish to study a subject not law.georgetown.edu/registrar/externships. offered by the faculty may organize a html. student-initiated seminar. Students wishing Although the program coordinator to do so must secure a commitment from maintains a list of externship opportunities, a full-time faculty member to supervise the students are responsible for securing their seminar. Before the close of preregistration own placements. Students who are interested period, the organizing students must submit a course proposal to the Associate Dean for

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 36 Juris Doctor Program

Academic Administration before the close of exceed 20 hours of employment per week registration including the title of the seminar, during the academic year, as required by the supervising faculty member, a syllabus the American Bar Association. A student and a reading list. The Associate Dean will enrolled in the full-time program who is approve the application upon determination contemplating substantial employment must that the proposed seminar has substantial request a transfer to the part-time program, educational value and will be conducted with which is structured to accommodate those academic seriousness. Approved seminars who are employed full-time during their will earn 2 credits. These seminars are study at the Law Center. mandatory pass/fail and will count toward a student’s maximum of 6 pass/fail credits. WITHDRAWALS AND LEAVES OF ABSENCE Duplication of Courses Students will not receive credit for a course Withdrawal from Individual that is substantially similar to any other Courses course completed by the student as part A student may withdraw from a required of the requirements for the J.D. degree. or elective first-year course (including those Students with questions about the appli- required courses taken during the second cability of this rule to their course choices year of study by part-time students) only should consult the Registrar, the Assistant with the permission of the Registrar or an Dean or Director, J.D. Academic Services. Academic Advisor.* Waivers must be secured in writing, with a After the end of the Add/Drop period copy to be maintained in the student’s file. for the relevant semester, an upperclass student may withdraw from a course only Restrictions on Student after consultation with and approval by the Employment Registrar or an Academic Advisor. In order The program of instruction in the full-time to withdraw from any course for which the program is a demanding one designed to permission of the professor was required to command substantially all of the student’s enroll, a student must obtain the permission time during the academic year. Devoting too of that professor. A withdrawal is recorded much time to employment is a frequent cause on a student’s transcript either as a “with- of disappointing academic performance drawal” or an “excused withdrawal.” After and, sometimes, of academic failure. For the fourth week of the semester, a with- these reasons, professional organizations, drawal will be considered “excused” only including accrediting agencies, require that a under exceptional circumstances. Special student enrolling in the full-time program be rules regarding withdrawal from a clinic are in a position to devote substantially all of his set forth in the section on Clinic Enrollment or her working hours to the study of law. Policies, below. The Law Center strongly urges first- year full-time students not to accept outside Note: Due to U.S. visa regulations, interna- employment. All full-time students should tional students who wish to withdraw from carefully restrict their hours of employment any course or from the Law Center must and in no event may a full-time student obtain approval from the Visa Advisor in the

* Academic Advisors include the Senior Assistant Dean (J.D. Program), the Assistant Dean (J.D. Aca- demic Services), the Assistant Dean (Clinical Programs), the Director, J.D. Academic Services, or the Dean of Students.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 37

Office of Graduate Programs, in addition to student who has withdrawn and then wishes obtaining approval to withdraw from the to return to the Law Center must apply for Registrar or an Academic Advisor. readmission through the regular admissions process. Leaves of Absence Students who have been absent from the Students in good standing who have Law Center longer than an approved leave completed at least one semester at the Law of absence, or who have failed to maintain Center may take a leave of absence if they matriculation by interrupting their course of obtain permission in advance from the study without having received approval for a Dean of Students, McDonough 210. Leaves leave of absence in advance will be involun- of absence typically are granted for one tarily withdrawn and must reapply through academic semester, and rarely are granted for the regular admissions process if they wish to longer than two academic semesters. A leave seek readmission to the Law Center. of absence does not extend the time limits for completion of the J.D. degree, described CLINIC ENROLLMENT POLICIES above in the section on Academic Evalua- tion and Attrition. The Law Center will not General Eligibility accept credit for work completed at another Georgetown Law’s clinics are open to law school during a leave of absence without upperclass J.D. students. LL.M. students the prior written approval of the Dean of are not permitted to enroll in any clinic. Students and the Senior Assistant Dean, J.D. Six clinical courses (the Center for Applied Program. Legal Studies, Federal Legislation, Harrison In exceptional circumstances, students Institute Policy, Harrison Institute Housing who wish to leave the Law Center after and Community Development, Institute for matriculating but before completing their Public Representation, and International first semester may request permission for a Women’s Human Rights), are open to leave of absence from the Dean of Students. students (full-time and part-time) who will Tuition will not be refunded in the event have completed a minimum of 28 academic of a leave of absence unless otherwise refund- credits before the beginning of the semester able under the Tuition Refund Schedule in in which the students are enrolled in a clinic. this Bulletin. In rare circumstances, a student The two Street Law clinics will also accept returning from an approved leave may part-time students who have completed the receive an adjustment to the tuition charged required 22 academic credits of their first up to the amount of tuition paid in the year. Four clinical courses (Criminal Justice, semester in which the leave of absence was Domestic Violence, Juvenile Justice, and Law taken. Any such tuition adjustment must be Students in Court) are only open to students approved by the Dean of Students. who have completed the courses and credits required by the D.C. Student Practice Rule Withdrawal From the Law (see Tribunal Rules Governing Student Center Practice below). The Appellate Litigation Students may voluntarily withdraw from the Clinic is only open to third-year full-time Law Center (as opposed to taking a leave of students and part-time students who will absence) at any time. Students who wish to have completed the equivalent of four voluntarily withdraw from the Law Center full-time semesters by the end of their Fall should notify the Registrar in writing of semester in the clinic. their decision. Once withdrawn, a student no longer is matriculated at the Law Center. A

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 38 Juris Doctor Program

Part-Time Student Enrollment for practice under the D.C. Student Practice Part-time students are welcome to apply Rule. To be certifiable under this rule, a for a clinic as long as they are not rendered student must have successfully completed ineligible for a particular clinic because they 41 academic credits, including Evidence, are employed by the Federal or District of Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure Columbia governments and they do not (both curriculums A and B satisfy the Civil have job responsibilities during the day that Procedure and Criminal Procedure require- preclude the time commitment demanded ments), and receive a character clearance by clinics and ethical client service. Summer from the Bar Character Committee before clinics will give preference to part-time the beginning of the semester in which the students assuming they meet other admis- student is enrolled in a clinic. Students sion criteria. Second year part-time students who have transferred or are visiting from and interdivisional transfer students may another school should note that a Criminal not defer taking their required second year Law course taken at the student’s former courses (Criminal Justice and the first year school generally will not fulfill the Criminal elective) in order to participate in a clinic. Procedure prerequisite. As a result, students who have not taken Criminal Procedure at Visiting Student Enrollment their former schools will need to complete Visiting students are eligible to enroll in a Georgetown Law’s Criminal Procedure clinic, but will be admitted only after all course before being admitted to a clinic that interested Georgetown Law students have practices before the courts or agencies of the been accepted. District of Columbia. Students with felony and some misde- Minimum Cumulative Grade meanor convictions or arrests (including Point Average and Academic juvenile cases or cases in which expunge- ment has taken place), students with a Performance history of dishonesty including plagiarism, Students seeking to enroll in a clinic during students with a recent history of drug or their second year in law school must have alcohol abuse, and students with a history maintained at least a 2.00 cumulative grade of serious financial irresponsibility might point average at the end of their first year. not be cleared by the D.C. Bar Character Students who fail or withdraw from any of Committee in time to actually appear in their required first-year courses will not be court while a member of the clinic. The D.C. permitted to enroll in a clinic in any year Bar Character Committee is also unwilling until they have retaken and successfully to admit students who have matters pending completed the course(s) they failed or from before the law school’s Professional Respon- which they withdrew. Part-time and inter- sibility Committee. Students who are unable divisional (part-time to full-time) transfer to obtain a character clearance by the students are permitted to enroll in certain time clinic classes begin may be unable to clinics prior to completing Criminal Justice maintain their enrollment in the clinic. and the first year elective. Students applying to clinics that practice in other jurisdictions, such as federal court, Tribunal Rules Governing may also need to comply with student Student Practice practice rules. Most federal courts require Students seeking admission to clinics certification by the Dean of a student’s good requiring practice in the courts or agencies character before the student is permitted of the District of Columbia must be certified to appear before the court. An adverse

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 39 disciplinary ruling in law school or college, applicant may apply toward their degree or a pending matter before Georgetown’s (e.g., New York permits students to take Professional Responsibility Committee, could a maximum of 20 clinical credits out of prevent a student from receiving the required a required 80 credit degree program). certification. Applicants should consult the jurisdiction Students with questions about the char- in which they plan to take the Bar to deter- acter clearance or Dean’s certification should mine whether such a restriction applies. For contact the Associate or Assistant Dean for assistance in obtaining information regarding Clinical Programs. the rules in a particular jurisdiction, students may contact Professor Michael Frisch, Ethics Conflict of Interest Counsel, (202) 662-9926 or frischm@law. Because of the federal conflicts of interest georgetown.edu. statute (see 18 U.S.C. §205-207), students with part-time or full-time jobs with the Overlap With Skills Training Federal government may not be eligible to Courses participate in the Appellate Litigation Clinic, Students may not take Civil Litigation the Criminal Justice Clinic, the Center for Practice, Patent Trial Practice, Trial Practice Applied Legal Studies, the Federal Legisla- and Applied Evidence, Trial Practice: tion and Administrative Clinic, the Harrison Working with Expert Witnesses, Trial Institute, the Institute for Public Representa- Practice: Criminal Law and Advocacy, Trial tion, or Law Students in Court. Students Advocacy and Practice or any section of Trial with part-time or full-time jobs with the Practice during the same semester or a subse- District of Columbia or the U.S. Attorney’s quent semester in which they enroll in the Office for the District of Columbia may Center for Applied Legal Studies, Criminal not be eligible to participate in the Juvenile Justice, Domestic Violence, Juvenile Justice, Justice Clinic, the Harrison Institute, Law or Law Students in Court. If a student has Students in Court, or the Institute for Public taken or is currently enrolled in the Appellate Representation. Students who are uncertain Practice Seminar, that student cannot also about the application of this rule to them enroll for credit in the Appellate Litigation should consult with the Associate or Assis- Clinic (or vice versa). tant Dean for Clinical Programs. Limitations on Clinics and Limits on Clinical Credits Externships It is theoretically possible to take more than Due to competing time demands, a student is one client representation clinic, although not permitted to enroll in an externship or an limited clinical resources make this extremely experiential learning course during the same unlikely. To ensure equitable access to clinics, semester in which the student is enrolled preference will be given to students who in any clinic except the Street Law Clinic. have not previously taken a clinical course Students who take the Street Law Clinic and other than Street Law. As a result, students do an externship or enroll in an experiential who enroll in a clinic other than Street Law learning course in the same semester are will probably not be able to gain access to expected to prioritize their obligations to another clinic in a subsequent year. Partici- the clinic first and to manage their time in pating in two clinics in the same year (not accordance with these priorities. including summer) is prohibited. The Bar admission rules of certain states limit the number of clinical credits an

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 40 Juris Doctor Program

Clinic Orientation and Early sion of the professor and the Associate Dean Interview Week is required for withdrawal from a Spring Many clinics require students to attend an semester clinic. Permission is not readily orientation that takes place during the week granted. before classes begin in the fall. That week In the absence of permission to is also when many students interview with withdraw, a student failing to participate in law firms who come to the Law Center for the clinic to which he or she was admitted Early Interview Week. In order to enable will receive a grade of F for the appropriate clinic students to participate in Early Inter- number of credits. Strict enforcement of view Week, fall clinic orientations will only this policy is necessary to protect students be held in the afternoons. If you enroll in who might otherwise be foreclosed from a clinic that holds a pre-semester orienta- obtaining a clinic seat, clients who might tion and you sign up for Early Interview not be adequately served, clinic morale, and Week, the interview scheduling program the Law Center’s relationships with other used by the Office of Career Services will institutions. automatically schedule all of your interviews In the absence of a showing of special for the morning time slots on the days your hardship, students taking full-year clinics orientation takes place. Interviews that may not obtain any credit unless they remain week are granted through a computerized in the clinic for the full academic year and lottery program. While past experience does complete all required work. If the clinic not indicate that students taking clinics are director and the Associate Dean for Clinical adversely affected in the number of inter- Education permit a student to withdraw views they receive in total through the week, from a clinic prior to completing the clinic the restrictions of interviews to mornings requirements, the amount of credit received only may impact the specific employers with for work the student has actually completed which a student receives those interviews. will be determined by the professor respon- Nevertheless, the computerized lottery sible for assigning the student’s grade. program is designed to maximize the number Credits for year-long clinics are allocated in of interviews you and all other students accordance with a fixed formula set by the receive in the available time for interviews. faculty on the basis of classroom seminars, skills training, and field work. No additional Dropping a Clinic or credits will be awarded regardless of the Withdrawal from a Clinic in amount of time or effort involved in fulfilling clinic obligations. Progress The Law Center’s policy regarding with- drawal from a clinic is very strict. Any Clinic Extension Policy Clinic students are generally expected to student seeking to withdraw from a Fall work for their clinic until the end of the semester or full-year clinic must obtain examination period unless the clinic director permission from the professor who originally has established a shorter period. In some admitted the student and the Associate cases, the needs of clinic clients will require Dean for Clinical Education. A student may that a student perform some tasks after the withdraw his or her acceptance of a Spring semester ends. In other cases, students may semester clinic no later than November 6, request an extension to complete a project. 2009, by notifying the clinic director and In either case, if a student’s grade is to be the Assistant Dean for Clinical Programs in delayed, an extension form must be filled writing. After November 6, 2009, permis- out before the examination period begins

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Juris Doctor Program 41 and will be effective only upon review and signature of the Associate Dean for Clinical Education. If a tribunal or legislative body has continued a clinic case for hearing beyond the period of the student’s clinic enrollment, the Associate Dean will gener- ally grant an extension until the completion of the hearing. Except in unusual cases, an extension requested for any other reason will not be approved if it exceeds one month from the end of the examination period. If an extension is approved, grades will be submitted to the Registrar’s office within three weeks after the extension expires.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 42 Juris Doctor Program

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Joint Degree Programs 43

J.D./MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 45

J.D./MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FOREIGN SERVICE 46

J.D./MASTER OF ARTS IN ARAB STUDIES 47

J.D./MASTER OF ARTS IN RUSSIAN AND 48 EASTERN EUROPEAN STUDIES

J.D./MASTER OF ARTS IN GERMAN 49 AND EUROPEAN STUDIES

J.D./MASTER OF ARTS IN LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES 50

J.D./MASTER OF ARTS IN SECURITY STUDIES 50

J.D./PH.D. IN GOVERNMENT 51

J.D./PH.D. IN PHILOSOPHY 52

J.D./MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH 52 J OIN T D EGREE P ROGRAMS

J.D./MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY 53

JOINT J.D./LL.M. IN TAXATION 53

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 43 44 Joint Degree Programs

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Joint Degree Programs 45

he Law Center sponsors degree programs in which a student may simultaneously pur- Tsue study leading to the Juris Doctor (J.D.) from the Law Center and a graduate degree from the Georgetown University School of Business Administration (M.B.A.), Georgetown Public Policy Institute (M.P.P.), School of Foreign Service (M.S.F.S., M.A.A.S., M.A.R.E.E.S., M.A.G.E.S., M.A.L.A.S., and M.A.S.S.P.), the Department of Government (J.D./Ph.D.), or the Department of Philosophy (J.D./M.A., J.D./Ph.D.). A J.D./M.P.H. is also offered in coopera- tion with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (M.P.H.). The J.D./M.B.A., J.D./M.P.P., and J.D./School of Foreign Service programs provide for accelerated achievement of two degrees in four years instead of the five normally required to complete the degrees separately. J.D./Philosophy and J.D./Government degrees are also accelerated, with completion depending on whether a student is full-time or part-time and is a Masters or Doctoral candidate. The J.D./M.P.H. degree program, while not an accelerated program, affords students who are not health professionals the opportunity to coordinate the study of law and public health at two highly respected institutions. For information on admissions requirements and application procedures for the joint degree programs, contact the Office of Admissions. Students must apply separately to the Law Center and to the companion graduate program. Transfer students must complete a minimum of 54 credits at the Law Center. Credits awarded for work completed in a graduate program will not count toward the 54 Law Center credits. JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF are responsible for consulting the M.B.A. BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION program to learn of any changes that may J.D./M.B.A. students must satisfactorily affect their planning. complete course requirements for both the J.D. and M.B.A. degree programs. In The 123.75 credit hours constituting the addition to the J.D. and M.B.A. degrees, a J.D./M.B.A. curriculum are distributed as Joint Program Certificate will be awarded follows: upon completion of the program. • 31 credits of the required first-year law The J.D./M.B.A. program requires curriculum*; completion of 123.75* academic credits (76* • 21-27 credits in upperclass law courses, credits in law and 47.75 credits in M.B.A. including Professional Responsibility courses with 9 credits of MBA course work and satisfactory completion of the legal counted toward the J.D. and 12 credits writing requirement. Credit requirements of J.D. course work counted toward your in this area will vary depending upon the MBA). Upperclass J.D. courses must fulfill student’s choice of courses within one of distribution requirements for either the the focus areas described below; Corporate Law or the Public Policy focus as • Law school Residency Requirement (see outlined below. J.D. Program section); • 26.25 credits of required MBA core Important Note: As of the date of this courses taken in the second and third document, the M.B.A. credit system is year comprised of Corporate Finance, undergoing review and revision. Students Financial Accounting, Financial

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 46 Joint Degree Programs

Markets, International Business Environ- Public Policy Focus ment, Leadership & Business Ethics In addition to the core requirements, I & II, Microeconomics, Managerial students selecting the public policy focus Accounting, Management Communica- must complete: tion, Management Science, Marketing, • 18 credits of required public policy- Organizational Behavior, Operations related law courses taken in the third Management, Statistics, and Strategic and fourth years, which include: Admin- Management; istrative Law, Constitutional Law II, {{ 5.75 credits from four required Corporations, Legislation and Statutory MBA residencies: Interpretation, and Taxation I; and • Georgetown Means Business • 6 credits of required public policy-related Residency (0.25 credits); law courses to be taken in the third or • Innovation Residency (1 credit):– fourth year (in addition to those listed one week course in Spring of the above). first MBA year; • Leadership Residency (1 credit) A typical distribution of semester hours in – one week course prior to the this joint degree program, 76 J.D. and 47.75 second MBA year; M.B.A. academic credits, is as follows: • Global Residency & Course (3.50 First year: 31 J.D. credits credits) – module two and three Second year: 31 M.B.A. credits course followed by a week-long Third Year: 30 J.D. credits residency abroad in the second Fourth Year: 15 J.D. credits MBA year; 16.75 M.B.A. credits {{ 15.75 credits of M.B.A. electives in the second, third, and/or fourth year; JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF and SCIENCE IN FOREIGN SERVICE • Minimum J.D. cumulative grade point J.D./M.S.F.S. degree candidates must satisfac- average of 2.00. Minimum M.B.A. torily complete course requirements for both cumulative grade point average of 3.00. the J.D. and M.S.F.S. degrees. In addition to the J.D. and M.S.F.S. degrees, a Joint Corporate Law Focus Program Certificate will be awarded upon In addition to the core requirements, satisfactory completion of the program. students selecting the corporate law focus The J.D./M.S.F.S. program requires * * must complete: completion of 115 academic credits (76 credits in law and 39 credits in M.S.F.S. • 12 credits of required business-related courses with 9 credits of M.S.F.S. course law courses taken in the third and fourth work counted toward the J.D.), satisfactory years, which include: Corporations, performance on the M.S.F.S. oral proficiency Taxation I and Taxation II; and examination in a foreign language and the • 6 credits of business-related law courses M.S.F.S. oral examinations, and maintenance to be taken in the third or fourth year (in of a minimum cumulative GPA of 3.00. addition to those listed above). The required 115* J.D./M.S.F.S. academic credits are distributed as follows: • 31 credits in the required first-year law curriculum*;

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Joint Degree Programs 47

• 15 credits of core M.S.F.S. courses taken JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS during the first year: International Trade; IN ARAB STUDIES International Finance; Globalization of J.D./M.A.A.S. degree candidates must Intersocietal Relations; International satisfactorily complete course requirements Relations: Theory and Practice; and for both the J.D. and M.A.A.S. degrees. In Analytical and Statistical Skills; addition to the J.D. and M.A.A.S. degrees, • 21 credits in M.S.F.S. electives related to a Joint Program Certificate will be awarded one of four broad divisional concentra- upon satisfactory completion of the program. tions: International Relations & Security; Students undertake a four-year course International Business; International of study comprising a minimum of 109* Development; or a self-designed concen- academic credits (79* credits of Law Center tration (subject to approval, including courses and 30 credits of M.A.A.S. work, regional studies) taken in the first, third with 6 credits from the Law Center counted and fourth years; toward the M.A.A.S. degree and 6 credits of • a 3-credit M.S.F.S. Workshop, taken in M.A.A.S. course work counted toward the the third or fourth year; J.D.). Candidates for this joint degree • 16 J.D. credits in the international law must satisfy the academic standards of the curriculum taken in the third and fourth two programs: maintain a minimum years; B (3.00/4.00) average, demonstrate advanced • 29 credits in additional upperclass law language ability through successful comple- courses, including Professional Respon- tion of the M.A.A.S. Arabic language oral sibility and successful completion of the and written proficiency examinations, and legal writing requirement, taken in the successfully complete the oral comprehensive third and fourth years; examination of the M.A.A.S. Program (or • Residency Requirement (see J.D. the thesis option). Program section); and Students may pursue the joint program • Minimum cumulative grade point toward the M.A. in Arab Studies/Juris average of 3.00. Doctor from a number of different M.A.A.S. concentrations: A typical distribution of the 115 • M.A.A.S. concentration in Women/ academic credits in the J.D./M.S.F.S. Program Gender (with law focus on Family Law is as follows: or International/ Comparative Law – First year: 24 M.S.F.S. credits Human Rights) (students are also expected to complete • M.A.A.S. concentration in Politics (with a 15-20 hours/week internship during law focus on International/Comparative this year) Law - Human Rights, or on Interna- Second year: 31* J.D. credits tional/National Security Law) Third Year: 21 J.D. credits • M.A.A.S. concentration in Culture/ 9 M.S.F.S. credits Society – especially Islam/Islamic soci- Fourth Year: 24 J.D. credits eties (with law focus on International/ 6 M.S.F.S. credits Comparative Law, Family Law, or Law and Other Disciplines)

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 48 Joint Degree Programs

Curriculum Outline The first year may be pursued at either • 24 credits of M.A.A.S. course work, or the Law Center or Main Campus, primarily 18 credits plus intensive Arabic if neces- depending on the student’s Arabic status. sary, taken during the first year of the Inmost cases, the first year will be at the Law joint program (see Language Require- Center; in those cases in which the student ment); has just completed a course of intensive • 31 credits of the required first-year law Arabic language study prior to matricula- curriculum taken during the second year tion, such that a disruption in study of the (see Language Requirement) of the joint language would be counterproductive, the program*; student should start at the Main Campus in • 29 credits in further law courses the appropriate level of Arabic. In all cases, including Professional Responsibility before starting Main Campus course work, a and the legal writing requirement. These student should be at least at an intermediate courses are distributed among the third level of Arabic, i.e., have completed one year and fourth years; or a Summer program in intensive beginning • 19 credits in international law courses Arabic, totaling 12 credits. including: 3 credits in the required course International Law I: Introduction JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF to International Law; 4 credits in further ARTS IN RUSSIAN AND EASTERN international law courses; and 12 other EUROPEAN STUDIES credits in international law or interna- J.D./M.A.R.E.E.S. degree candidates must tional law-related courses which comple- satisfy course requirements for both the J.D. ment the student’s area of concentration. and M.A.R.E.E.S. degrees. In addition to These courses are taken in the third and the J.D. and M.A.R.E.E.S. degrees, a Joint fourth years. Students should focus their Program Certificate will be awarded upon electives on their M.A.A.S. divisional satisfactory completion of the program. concentration, integrating their interests Students undertake a four-year course in law and the Arab world; of study comprising a minimum of 109* • 6-12 credits (depending on how many academic credits (76* credits of Law Center hours were completed in the first or courses and 33 credits of M.A.R.E.E.S. second year) of M.A.A.S. course work, courses), with 9 credits from the Law Center taken in the second, third, and/or fourth counted toward the M.A.R.E.E.S. degree years or during Summer sessions; and and 9 credits of M.A.R.E.E.S. course work • Residency Requirement (see J.D. counted toward the J.D. Candidates for Program section). this joint degree must satisfy the academic standards of the two programs including: Language Requirement maintaining a minimum B (3.00/4.00) The M.A. in Arab Studies program is average, complete the two required courses, distinct from the other School of Foreign Introduction to Area Studies and the Service Masters programs in that it builds Capstone Seminar, demonstrate advanced intensive study of Arabic language (for those relevant foreign language ability through who need it) into its curriculum. Thus, the successful completion of two advanced Arabic language requirement will have some language courses, and make a public presen- bearing on the proposed joint J.D./M.A.A.S. tation of research completed in the Capstone program. Seminar. * 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Joint Degree Programs 49

Curriculum Outline toward the M.A.G.E.S. degree and 9 credits • 24 credits of M.A.R.E.E.S. course of M.A.G.E.S. course work counted toward work, including two advanced language the J.D. Candidates for this joint degree must courses, Introduction to Area Studies satisfy the academic standards of the two and the Capstone Seminar; programs including: maintain a minimal B • 31 credits of the required first-year law (3.00/4.00) average, demonstrate relevant curriculum (taken in the second year of foreign language ability through successful the joint program)*; completion of the M.A.G.E.S. written and • 29 credits in further law courses oral language examinations, and success- including Professional Responsibility fully complete the oral examination of the and the legal writing requirement. These M.A.G.E.S. Program. courses are distributed among the third and fourth years; Curriculum Outline • 16 credits in international law courses • 31 credits of required first year law including: 3 credits in the required curriculum (normally taken in the first course, International Law I: Introduction year of the joint program)*; to International Law; 4 credits in further • 21 credits of required M.A.G.E.S. course international law courses; and 9 other work normally taken in the second year credits in international law or interna- of the joint program: GERM 510 Theo- tional law-related courses which comple- rizing Culture, INAF 590 International ment the student’s area concentration. Relations in Europe, HIST 541 Modern These courses are taken in the third and German and European History, ECON fourth years; 547 The European Economy, GOVT 593 • 9 credits of additional M.A.R.E.E.S. Comparative European Politics, GOVT coursework, taken in the second, third, 590 The European Union, and INAF 980 and/or fourth years or during Summer MAGES Master’s Project Seminar; sessions; and • 29 credits in further law courses • Residency Requirement (see J.D. including Professional Responsibility Program section). and the legal writing requirement. These courses are distributed among the third JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS and fourth years; IN GERMAN AND EUROPEAN • 16 credits in international law courses STUDIES including: 3 credits in the required J.D./M.A.G.E.S. degree candidates must course: International Law I: Introduction satisfactorily complete course requirements to International Law; 4 credits in further for both the J.D. and M.A.G.E.S. degrees. international law courses; and 9 other In addition to the J.D. and M.A.G.E.S. credits in international law or interna- degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will be tional law-related courses which comple- awarded upon satisfactory completion of ment the student’s area concentration. the program. Students undertake a four-year These courses are taken in the third and course of study comprising a minimum fourth years; of 115* academic credits: 76* Law Center • 18 credits of additional M.A.G.E.S. credits and 39 credits of M.A.G.E.S. work, course work, taken in the second, third, with 9 credits from the Law Center counted and/or fourth years which includes 3

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 50 Joint Degree Programs

MAGES Directed Elective courses chosen law curriculum, ordinarily taken in the from the disciplines of Comparative second year of the joint program*; Politics, Cultural Studies, Economics, • 32 credits in further law courses International Relations, or History and 3 including Professional Responsibility MAGES Elective courses; and the legal writing requirement. These • MAGES first and second foreign courses are distributed among the third language exams and MAGES oral exami- and fourth years; nation; and • 16 credits in international law courses • Georgetown Law Residency Require- including: 3 credits in the required ment (see J.D. Program section). course International Law I: Introduction to International Law and 13 credits JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS in further international law courses at IN LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES least 6 of which should focus on Latin J.D./M.A.L.A.S. degree candidates must America. These courses are taken in satisfactorily complete course requirements the third and fourth years of the joint for both the J.D. and M.A.L.A.S. degrees. In program; and addition to the J.D. and M.A.L.A.S. degrees, • Residency Requirement (see J.D. a Joint Program Certificate will be awarded Program section). upon satisfactory completion of the program. Students undertake a four-year course JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS of study comprising a minimum of 109* IN SECURITY STUDIES academic credits (79* Law Center credits and J.D./M.A.S.S.P. degree candidates must 30 credits of M.A.L.A.S. courses). 6 credits satisfactorily complete course requirements from the Law Center will satisfy M.A.L.A.S. for both the J.D. and M.A.S.S.P. degrees. In degree requirements and 6 credits of addition to the J.D. and M.A.S.S.P. degrees, M.A.L.A.S. course work will satisfy J.D. a Joint Program Certificate will be awarded requirements. Candidates for this joint upon satisfactory completion of the program. degree must satisfy the academic standards Students in the joint degree program under- of the two programs: maintain a minimum B take a four-year course of study comprising a (3.00/4.00) average; demonstrate advanced minimum of 109* academic credits (79* Law foreign language ability through successful Center credits and 30 credits of M.A.S.S.P. completion of a Spanish or Portuguese oral courses). 6 credits from the Law Center will proficiency examination; and successfully satisfy M.A.S.S.P. degree requirements, and 6 complete the written comprehensive exami- credits of M.A.S.S.P. course work will satisfy nation of the M.A.L.A.S. Program. J.D. requirements.

Curriculum Outline Curriculum Outline • 24 credits of M.A.L.A.S. course work, • 24 credits of M.A.S.S.P. course work ordinarily taken in the first year of the taken in the first year of the joint joint program; program, including completion all of all • 6 credits of additional M.A.L.A.S. core classes for the program. Students coursework, in the second, third, and/or will also be responsible for completing fourth years or during a Summer session; most of the M.A.S.S.P. requirements in • 31 credits of the required first-year this first year, specifically:

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Joint Degree Programs 51

• Completion of SEST-500, Theory and JURIS DOCTOR/PH.D. IN Practice of Security; GOVERNMENT • Completion of SEST-501, Grand Strategy The J.D./Government program awards the and Military Operations; Juris Doctor and a Doctorate in Government • Completion of SEST-502, Analytical (with an M.A. en passant). The program Methods in Security; allows students to specialize in American • Selection and completion of a concentra- government, international relations, compar- tion – either Intelligence, International Security, Military Operations, Science ative government, or political theory. and Technology, Terrorism and Substate J.D./Ph.D. students must satisfactorily Violence, Unconventional Weapons complete requirements for both the J.D. and and Non-Proliferation, U.S. National the Ph.D. degrees. Separate diplomas will be Security, or a customized concentration awarded, and upon satisfactory completion negotiated with the Director of the SSP. of the program, a Joint Degree Certificate This concentration includes: a core class will be awarded as well. An M.A. degree is for the concentration, three electives awarded en passant to students enrolled in within the concentration, and SEST-700, the Ph.D. program upon completion of 48 Thesis Seminar; academic credits and course distribution • Completion of distribution requirements requirements in the Government program in three of the following areas: Science and at least 6 credits of upperclass J.D. and Technology, Area Security Studies, course work. and Economics and Security; Students in the joint degree program are • 31 credits of the required first-year law required to take the first year of law school curriculum (taken in the second year of as an intact block. This school year may be the joint program)*; taken prior to or after completing one year • 32 credits in further law courses including Professional Responsibility of Government course work, but no earlier and the legal writing requirement. These or later. Students may spend a year entirely courses are distributed among the third devoted to Government course work, but and fourth years; they need not do so. • 16 credits in international law courses, J.D./Government students must complete including three credits in International all required courses and the total number of Law I and 13 credits in further interna- academic credits for graduation (76* in law tional law courses, at least 3 of which and 48 in government for the M.A., with 9 need to be in international/national credits of Government course work counted security law; toward the J.D., and an additional 15 for the • 3 credits of additional M.A.S.S.P. course- Ph.D. in the fields of Comparative Govern- work, taken in the third, and/or fourth ment, International Relations, and Political years or during Summer sessions; Theory, or an additional 18 for the Ph.D. • Passage of a four-hour comprehensive in American Government); approximately exam to be taken in the final semester of 21 credits from the J.D. count toward the M.A.S.S.P; Ph.D. Therefore, students must take about • Residency Requirement (see J.D. 27 credits unique to the Ph.D.; perform Program section); and satisfactorily in both the oral/reading foreign • Minimum cumulative grade point language examinations and the major and average of 2.00 for the Law Center and minor comprehensive examinations; submit a 3.00 for the M.A.S.S.P. * 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 52 Joint Degree Programs a dissertation proposal; successfully complete in Professional Responsibility, and meet the and defend a dissertation in Government; J.D. residency requirement. satisfy the J.D. professional responsibility J.D./Philosophy students are required and legal writing requirements; and meet the to take the first year of law school and the J.D. residency requirement (see J.D. Program first year of Philosophy course work as intact section). blocks. The law school year may be taken Students may enroll in the joint degree either immediately prior to or immediately program on a full- or part-time basis. A after completing one year of Philosophy student in this joint degree program may course work, but no earlier or later. receive his or her law degree before the completion of the program providing that JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF the course work for the law degree has been PUBLIC HEALTH completed and the student has completed 48 The J.D./M.P.H. program is comprised of credits of government course work. two individual degrees. A student in this program is expected to complete the required JURIS DOCTOR/M.A. OR PH.D. IN 85* academic credits for the J.D. at George- PHILOSOPHY town, as well as the 80 units necessary for J.D./Philosophy students must satisfactorily the M.P.H. at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg complete the course requirements for both School of Public Health, in four years. the J.D. and Philosophy degrees. A Joint Students may request, by written petition, to Program Certificate will be awarded upon apply 10 M.P.H. credits (equivalent to 6 Law completion of the entire program. Center credits) to their J.D. academic credit The J.D./M.A. program requires the requirement. student to complete 100 academic credits The student will spend his or her first (76* credits in J.D. course work and 24 (or year at the Law Center, taking the standard 18 and a thesis) in Philosophy course work curriculum of 31* credits for a first-year with 9 credits of Philosophy course work J.D. student. The student then will spend counted toward the J.D. and 6 credits of the ensuing 11 months in residence at the law course work counted toward the M.A.). Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Further, the student must pass a comprehen- Health completing the M.P.H. component of sive examination in Philosophy, satisfy the the joint degree program. After completing legal writing requirement, complete a course the M.P.H., the student will return to the in Professional Responsibility, and meet the Law Center to complete the remaining two J.D. residency requirement. years of the J.D. program, including a course The J.D./Ph.D. in Philosophy requires in Professional Responsibility and the legal the student to complete 112 academic credits writing requirement. (76* credits in J.D. course work and 36 in Participants in this joint degree program Philosophy course work with 9 credits of complete the following: Philosophy course work counted toward • 31* credits in required first-year law the J.D. and 9 credits of law course work curriculum; counted toward the Ph.D.), successful • 11 months (starting in July) in residence completion of three comprehensive examina- at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School tions in Philosophy, a dissertation, satisfy the of Public Health. During this period, legal writing requirement, complete a course students complete a series of M.P.H. core

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Joint Degree Programs 53

courses. While at the Johns Hopkins (or Comparative Public Management); Bloomberg School of Public Health, they Ethics Values and Public Policy (or are also required to take: Public Health Ethics in a Globalized World); Statistical and the Law, and Ethical Issues in Public Methods for Policy Analysis (formerly Health. Students are also directed to Quantitative Methods I); and Regression suggested elective courses; Methods for Policy Analysis (formerly • During the final two years at the Law Quantitative Methods II); Center students are strongly urged to • 9 credits of M.P.P. required courses taken take the Advanced Health Law seminar, in the third or fourth year: Advanced Administrative Law, Constitutional Law Regression & Program Evaluation II, and at least one additional seminar in Methods and a two-semester thesis; health law, biomedical ethics, law and • 9 credits of M.P.P. elective courses taken science, or a related subject; and in the second, third, and fourth years; • Residency Requirement (see J.D. • 10 required J.D. credits: Administra- Program section). tive Law; Constitutional Law II; and With permission, students are eligible to Legislation and Statutory Interpretation enroll in courses at Georgetown’s Kennedy (Administrative Law is not required for Institute of Ethics. The M.P.H. degree will students who have completed Govern- not be awarded until requirements for the ment Processes in Curriculum B); J.D. degree have been completed. • 35 credits in additional J.D. courses, including Professional Responsibility JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF and a course meeting the legal writing PUBLIC POLICY requirement, taken in the third and fourth years; and J.D./M.P.P. degree candidates must satisfacto- • Residency Requirement (see J.D. rily complete all course requirements of both Program section). the J.D. and M.P.P. degrees. In addition to A typical distribution of the 115 semester the J.D. and M.P.P. degrees, a Joint Program hours in the J.D./M.P.P. Program is as Certificate will be awarded upon satisfactory follows: completion of the program. The J.D./M.P.P. First year: 31* J.D. credits program requires completion of 115 Second year: 24 M.P.P. credits academic credits (76* credits in law and 39 Third Year: 21 J.D. credits credits in M.P.P. courses) with 9 credits from 9 M.P.P. credits the Law Center counted toward the M.P.P. Fourth Year: 24 J.D. credits degree and 9 credits of M.P.P. course work 6 M.P.P. credits counted toward the J.D. degree. The required 115 J.D./M.P.P. credit hours are distributed as follows: JOINT J.D./LL.M. IN TAXATION • 31* credits in the required first-year law The J.D./LL.M. joint degree program permits curriculum; students who are still completing their J.D. • 21 required M.P.P. credits taken during degree to take tax courses that will count the second or third year: Introduc- both toward the J.D. degree and also toward tion to Microtheory; Public Finance; an LL.M. degree in Taxation. Students in Public Policy Process (or Comparative this program are expected while still J.D. Policy Process); Public Management students to complete at least 12 credits of

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum in the 2005-06 or 2006-07 academic years. 2 fewer credits are required for students who completed the first-year law curriculum prior to the 2005-06 academic year. 2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 54 Joint Degree Programs courses listed in the Course Schedule as counting toward the LL.M. in Taxation (“qualifying tax credits”). After receiving their J.D. degree, joint degree students complete the additional academic credits necessary to fulfill the requirements of the Taxation LL.M. degree. Regardless of the number of qualifying tax credits completed during the J.D. phase of the program, all students are required to complete an addi- tional 12 credits following conferral of the J.D. degree. Students may complete these additional credits on a full-time or part-time basis. Joint degree students are expected to complete their LL.M. credits within two years of receiving their J.D. degree. For students in this program, all of the qualifying tax credits that they take while completing their J.D. degree will be shown on their LL.M. transcript, along with the additional courses taken during the LL.M. phase of the program, and all of these courses will be counted toward the student’s LL.M. grade point average. (Taxation I, which is a prerequisite to matriculation in the Tax LL.M. program, may not be included among the 12 J.D. credits counted toward the LL.M. degree). Georgetown students apply to the J.D./ LL.M. joint degree in the spring semester before the start of their final year and must have completed or be enrolled in Taxation I at the time of their application. Students who are enrolled as J.D. students in other ABA- approved schools are eligible to participate in this program provided they spend the final year of their J.D. studies as a visiting student at Georgetown. These students must apply for the LL.M. at the same time as they apply to visit and must have completed a basic course in federal income tax by the time of their application.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 55

DOCTOR OF JURIDICAL SCIENCE (S.J.D.) 57

MASTER OF LAWS IN ADVOCACY 58

MASTERS DEGREE REQUIREMENTS (FOR PROGRAMS 59 OTHER THAN ADVOCACY)

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LL.M. STUDENTS 59

SPECIFIC LL.M. DEGREE REQUIREMENTS FOR 59 U.S.-EDUCATED J.D. GRADUATES

SPECIFIC LL.M. DEGREE REQUIREMENTS FOR 61 FOREIGN-EDUCATED ATTORNEYS

JOINT J.D./LL.M. IN TAXATION 63 t e Programs CERTIFICATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 64

MASTER OF STUDIES IN LAW (M.S.L.) 67 G ra d ua ENROLLMENT AND CREDIT POLICIES 67

ATTENDANCE AND EVALUATION POLICIES 72

SPECIFIC VISA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 75

TUITION 76

STUDENTS AUDITING COURSES 76

RESTRICTIONS ON STUDENT EMPLOYMENT 76

STUDENT CONDUCT IN THE JOB SEARCH PROCESS 76

WITHDRAWAL AND LEAVES OF ABSENCE POLICIES 77

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 78

NON-DEGREE ENROLLMENT 78

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 55 56 Graduate Programs

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 57

he Law Center offers, in addition to the Juris Doctor degree, the following graduate de- Tgree programs. • Master of Laws (individualized program/ DOCTOR OF JURIDICAL SCIENCE general studies) (S.J.D.) • Master of Laws in Global Health Law Georgetown offers a program of study • Master of Laws in Global Health Law leading to a doctorate in law (S.J.D.). and International Institutions (jointly Admission to the S.J.D. program is subject offered with the Graduate Institute of to rigorous requirements and is open only to International and Development Studies outstanding applicants. Admission is based in Geneva, Switzerland) upon the applicant’s academic qualifications, • Master of Laws in International Business scholarly potential, dissertation topic and and Economic Law the availability of a full-time faculty member • Master of Laws in International Legal willing to supervise the applicant throughout Studies the program. • Master of Laws in Securities and Finan- cial Regulation Requirements for the S.J.D. • Master of Laws in Taxation Degree: • Master of Laws in Advocacy, for 1. Complete a two-year full-time course of students who complete a Clinical study, research, and writing under the Teaching Fellowship supervision of a full-time member of the • Master of Studies in Law faculty. For the first year, the candidate • Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) must be in residence in the Washington, D.C., area, and for the second year is The Law Center also offers the following normally expected to be in the area as Certificates to students enrolled in a Law well. In special circumstances, usually Center LL.M. program: involving the nature of the research • Certificate in Employee Benefits Law required for the dissertation, the candi- • Certificate in Estate Planning date may complete the dissertation • Certificate in International Human away from the Washington, D.C., area Rights Law if given permission from his/her faculty • Certificate in National Security Law supervisor and the Associate Dean for • Certificate in World Trade Organization Graduate Programs to do so. In this (WTO) Studies case, the candidate will be expected to return to the Law Center at least once a The Certificates in Employee Benefits semester to meet with his or her faculty Law and in Estate Planning, unlike the supervisor. other Certificates, are open to LL.M. degree 2. For the first two years of the program, candidates as well as to students who are S.J.D. students are expected to be full- not enrolled in an LL.M. program but who time students and to limit employment were admitted separately to these Certificate (on or off campus) to a maximum of programs. 20 hours per week. This employment The S.J.D., the LL.M. in Advocacy, restriction applies regardless of whether and the LL.M. programs for international a student’s visa would permit more hours students on student visas require full-time of employment. enrollment. Otherwise, the graduate program 3. Complete during the first year an of instruction is designed both for full-time approved program of at least ten and for part-time students.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 58 Graduate Programs

academic credits of coursework, Dean for Graduate Programs. Approval will with an average of “B” or better, and be granted only under extraordinary circum- substantial written work. In appropriate stances and only where the student is making circumstances, the Associate Dean, satisfactory progress. in consultation with the candidate’s dissertation advisor, may authorize the MASTER OF LAWS IN candidate to take fewer credits of course ADVOCACY work. The reduction in the number of course credits taken does not affect Degree Requirements the tuition that is charged. At the end To complete the degree of Master of Laws in of each academic year, the candidate’s Advocacy, students must meet the following dissertation committee will report to the requirements: Associate Dean for Graduate Programs • 24 months of residency during two whether the candidate is making satisfac- consecutive academic years as a Clinical tory academic progress. If, in the opinion Teaching Fellow, engaged in teaching of the dissertation committee and the and in the full-time supervision and Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, instruction of J.D. students who are the candidate is not making appropriate enrolled in a clinic. progress, the candidate may be termi- • 24 academic credits awarded for satisfac- nated from the program. tory performance of some combination 4. Submit a dissertation that is accepted by of the following, as determined by the the candidate’s dissertation committee student’s supervising faculty member: and complete an oral defense of the teaching, course development, practice dissertation. The dissertation must make of law, supervision of students, participa- an original and substantial contribution tion in clinic seminars, and completion to legal scholarship. Where the scholar- of coursework. Grades are recorded ship is truly exceptional, the committee pass/fail. may recommend that the degree be awarded with distinction. All Fellows affiliated with the Center for Applied Legal Studies must also complete Tuition a paper of publishable quality within five Tuition for the S.J.D. degree is charged at the years of their date of matriculation in full-time LL.M. rate for the first year, and order to obtain the LL.M. in Advocacy. at a rate equivalent to four academic credits The possibility of graduating with distinc- each semester for the second year. Beyond tion is available to all Master of Laws in the first two years, students are charged a Advocacy candidates. To achieve the with continuing registration fee equal to the rate distinction designation, Master of Laws in for one academic credit. Advocacy candidates must receive certifica- tion from their supervising faculty member Time for Completion of the that they have performed outstanding work Program throughout their two years in residence S.J.D. students are expected to complete their and have completed a paper of publishable degrees within four years after commencing quality. the program. Up to two additional years of With the exception of Clinical Teaching study may be granted if the candidate obtains Fellows affiliated with the Center for Applied the consent of his/her faculty supervisor, Legal Studies or Street Law, all Clinical and the request is approved by the Associate Teaching Fellows must be admitted to

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 59 practice in the District of Columbia. Clinical study approved by the Graduate Admis- Teaching Fellows affiliated with the Center sions Committee or an academic advisor. for Applied Legal Studies must be admitted There is no limitation on the number to practice in the bar of any state or the of J.D. upperclass courses that may be District of Columbia. included in the approved program, but The academic policies pertaining to the approval does not guarantee entry into Clinical Teaching Fellowships are further any particular course or seminar. defined in the Clinical Programs Fellowship Handbook and that handbook supersedes LL.M. IN GLOBAL HEALTH LAW the policies set forth in this Bulletin in the Requires, in addition to the general require- event of any inconsistency. ments: • 24 academic credits, including 16 MASTER OF LAWS DEGREE AND academic credits (“specialization PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS credits”) in courses listed under Global (for programs other than Advocacy) Health Law in the course schedule • As part of the required 16 specialization General Requirements for All credits, each student must successfully complete either the 4-credit course LL.M. Students (both U.S.- and Global Health Law or the 2-credit course foreign-educated attorneys) Global Health Law and the 2-credit Candidates for all Master of Laws degrees course Global Health Law: An Intensive, (with the exception of the Master of Laws in Problem-Based Exploration. Advocacy) must: • Complete the required number of LL.M. IN GLOBAL HEALTH LAW AND academic credits for the degree, INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS including any minimum number of Requires, in addition to the general require- hours in a specialization and/or required ments: courses as described in the appropriate • 12 academic credits completed at section below; Georgetown, including 10 academic • Earn a minimum cumulative grade point credits (“specialization credits”) in average of at least 2.00; courses listed under Global Health Law • Complete all requirements for the degree in the course schedule. within the prescribed period of study (see • As part of the required 10 specialization section on Period of Study below.) Full- credits at Georgetown, each student time students are expected to complete must successfully compete either (1) the the degree in one academic year, and 4-credit course Global Health Law or (2) part-time students may take up to three the 2-credit course Global Health Law years. and the 2-credit course Global Health Law: An Intensive, Problem-Based Specific LL.M. Degree Exploration. Requirements for U.S.-Educated • 39 European Credit Transfer and Accu- J.D. Graduates mulation System (ECTS) credits (three ECTS credits are the equivalent of 1 LL.M. (INDIVIDUALIZED PROGRAM) Georgetown academic credit) completed Requires, in addition to the general require- at the Graduate Institute of International ments: and Development Studies in Geneva, • 24 academic credits in a program of Switzerland, to be completed during a

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 60 Graduate Programs

full-time spring semester in residence at LL.M. IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS the Graduate Institute. As part of the 39 AND ECONOMIC LAW (IBEL) ECTS credits at the Graduate Institute: Requires, in addition to the general require- {{ Each student must complete 24 ments: ECTS credits through coursework • Successful completion either prior to or including the two compulsory during the LL.M. program of Interna- courses, International Health Law tional Law I or a comparable course in and Global Public Health: Current public international law. and Emerging Issues. • 24 academic credits, including 16 {{ Each student must complete either academic credits (“specialization an approved internship or a disserta- credits”) in courses listed in List C in the tion. IBEL Curriculum Guide (http://www.law. The internship must last for georgetown.edu/graduate/documents/ a minimum of four weeks, must CurriculumGuideforIBEL.pdf). have a dimension linked to global • As part of the 16 specialization credits, health legal and/or policy questions, student must successfully compete: and must be authorized in advance {{ at least one course that focuses on by the Joint LL.M. Committee. international regulation (see List A Students pursuing an internship in the Curriculum Guide), must submit an application to the {{ at least one course that focuses on committee at least one month prior international business (see List B in to the beginning of the internship. the Curriculum Guide), and At the completion of the internship, {{ Corporations, if they did not take students must submit a written a comparable course in their J.D. report to the Global Health Law studies. Program Director (Georgetown) of no more than 10,000 words LL.M. IN SECURITIES AND FINANCIAL developing some of the themes and REGULATION questions addressed during the Requires, in addition to the general require- internship. The report is graded and, ments: in conjunction with completion of • 24 academic credits, including 16 the internship, counts for 15 ECTS academic credits in courses listed under credits. Securities and Financial Regulation in With the prior approval of both the course schedule; the Head of the International Law • Prior or concurrent completion of a basic Unit at the Graduate Institute and course in Securities Regulation [Note: the Director of the Global Health this course does not count towards Law Program at Georgetown, a the required 16 Securities credits but, student may undertake a dissertation if taken as part of the student’s LL.M. instead of the required internship. A program, may count as elective credit dissertation entitles the student to 15 toward the 24 total academic credits ECTS credits. required for the degree]. • The academic policies of the Graduate Institute apply to credits completed at the Graduate Institute, including a dissertation, and are set forth in the Graduate Institute’s reglement for the degree program.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 61

LL.M. IN TAXATION of the required course for international Requires, in addition to the general require- students, U.S. Legal Discourse I unless ments: this requirement has been waived, in • 24 academic credits, including 20 writing, by an international student academic credits in courses listed under advisor from the Office of Graduate Taxation in the course schedule [Note: Programs. Waivers will be granted only Taxation I does not count towards the in exceptional circumstances. required 20 Taxation credits but, with the permission of the Director of the LL.M. IN GLOBAL HEALTH LAW Graduate Tax Program, it may count Requires, in addition to the general require- as elective credit towards the 24 total ments: academic credits required for the degree]; • 20 academic credits, including 14 • Completion of the courses (1) Income academic credits (“specialization Tax Accounting and (2) Corporate credits”) in courses listed under Global Income Tax Law I (with permission Health Law in the course schedule; of the Director of the Graduate Tax • As part of the required 14 specialization Program, the J.D. course Taxation II credits, each student must successfully may be substituted for Corporate Income complete (1) either the 4-credit course Tax Law I to satisfy this requirement). Global Health Law or the 2-credit course Students who have taken prior courses Global Health Law and the 2-credit on these subjects may petition the course Global Health Law: An Intensive, Director of the Graduate Tax Program to Problem-Based Exploration; have a required course waived in order • Participation in the Foundations of to substitute a tax elective. Petitions to American Law program or completion waive either of these required courses of the required course for international will be considered only if (1) the student students, U.S. Legal Discourse I unless (by e-mail or in writing) petitions for the this requirement has been waived, in waiver during the first semester of enroll- writing, by an international student ment in the Master of Laws in Taxation advisor from the Office of Graduate Program and (2) the student received a Programs. Waivers will be granted only minimum grade of “B” in a comparable in exceptional circumstances. course from an ABA-approved law school. LL.M. IN GLOBAL HEALTH LAW AND INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS Specific LL.M. Degree Requires, in addition to the general require- Requirements for Foreign- ments: • 12 academic credits completed at Educated Attorneys Georgetown, including 10 academic credits (“specialization credits”) in LL.M. (GENERAL STUDIES) courses listed under Global Health Law Requires, in addition to the general require- in the course schedule. ments: • As part of the required 10 specialization • 20 academic credits in a program of credits at Georgetown, each student study approved by an international must successfully compete either (1) the student advisor from the Office of 4-credit course Global Health Law or (2) Graduate Programs; the 2-credit course Global Health Law • Participation in the Foundations of and the 2-credit course Global Health American Law program or completion

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 62 Graduate Programs

Law: An Intensive, Problem-Based questions addressed during the Exploration. internship. The report is graded and, • Participation in the Foundations of in conjunction with completion of American Law program or completion the internship, counts for 15 ECTS of the required course for international credits. students, U.S. Legal Discourse I at {{ With the prior approval of both Georgetown, unless this requirement has the Head of the International Law been waived, in writing, by an interna- Unit at the Graduate Institute and tional student advisor from the Office the Director of the Global Health of Graduate Programs. Waivers will Law Program at Georgetown, a be granted only in exceptional circum- student may undertake a dissertation stances. instead of the required internship. A • 39 European Credit Transfer and Accu- dissertation entitles the student to 15 mulation System (ECTS) credits (three ECTS credits. ECTS credits are the equivalent of 1 • The academic policies of the Graduate Georgetown academic credit) completed Institute apply to credits completed at the Graduate Institute of International at the Graduate Institute, including a and Development Studies in Geneva, dissertation, and are set forth in the Switzerland, to be completed during a Graduate Institute’s reglement for the full-time spring semester in residence at degree program. the Graduate Institute. As part of the 39 ECTS credits at the Graduate Institute: LL.M. IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS {{ Each student must complete 24 AND ECONOMIC LAW (IBEL) ECTS credits through coursework Requires, in addition to the general require- including the two compulsory ments: courses, International Health Law • Successful completion either prior to or and Global Public Health: Current during the LL.M. program of Interna- and Emerging Issues. tional Law I or a comparable course in {{ Each student must complete either public international law. an approved internship or a disserta- • 20 academic credits, including 14 tion. academic credits (“specialization The internship must last for credits”) in courses listed in List C in the a minimum of four weeks, must IBEL Curriculum Guide (http://www.law. have a dimension linked to global georgetown.edu/graduate/documents/ health legal and/or policy questions, CurriculumGuideforIBEL.pdf). and must be authorized in advance • As part of the 14 specialization credits, by the Joint LL.M. Committee. student must successfully compete: Students pursuing an internship {{ at least one course that focuses on must submit an application to the international regulation (see List A committee at least one month prior in the Curriculum Guide), to the beginning of the internship. {{ at least one course that focuses on At the completion of the internship, international business (see List B in students must submit a written the Curriculum Guide), and report to the Global Health Law {{ Corporations. Program Director (Georgetown) • Participation in the Foundations of of no more than 10,000 words American Law program or completion developing some of the themes and of the required course for international

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 63

students, U.S. Legal Discourse I, unless writing, by an international student this requirement has been waived, in advisor from the Office of Graduate writing, by an international student Programs. Waivers will be granted only advisor from the Office of Graduate in exceptional circumstances. Programs. Waivers will be granted only in exceptional circumstances. LL.M. IN TAXATION Requires, in addition to the general require- LL.M. IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ments: STUDIES • 20 academic credits in a program of Requires, in addition to the general require- study approved by an international ments: student advisor from the Office of • 20 academic credits in a program of Graduate Programs, including a study approved by an international minimum of 16 academic credits in student advisor from the Office of courses listed under Taxation in the Graduate Programs, including a course schedule; minimum of 12 academic credits in • As part of the required 16 specialization courses listed under International and credits, completion of the courses (1) Comparative Law in the course schedule; U.S. Income Tax: Policies and Practices, • Participation in the Foundations of and (2) Corporate Income Tax Law I or American Law program or completion Taxation II; of the required course for international • Participation in the Foundations of students, U.S. Legal Discourse I, unless American Law program or completion this requirement has been waived, in of the required course for international writing, by an international student students, U.S. Legal Discourse I, unless advisor from the Office of Graduate this requirement has been waived, in Programs. Waivers will be granted only writing, by an international student in exceptional circumstances. advisor from the Office of Graduate Programs. Waivers will be granted only LL.M. IN SECURITIES AND FINANCIAL in exceptional circumstances. REGULATION Requires, in addition to the general require- Joint J.D./LL.M. in Taxation ments: The J.D./LL.M. joint degree program permits • 20 academic credits in a program of students who are still completing their J.D. study approved by an international degree to take tax courses that will count student advisor from the Office of both toward the J.D. degree and also toward Graduate Programs, including a an LL.M. degree in Taxation. Students in minimum of 14 academic credits in this program are expected, while still J.D. courses listed under Securities and Finan- students, to complete at least 12 credits cial Regulation in the course schedule; of courses listed in the course schedule as • As part of the required 14 specialization counting toward the LL.M. in Taxation credits, completion of a basic course in (“qualifying tax credits”). After receiving Securities Regulation; their J.D. degree, joint degree students • Participation in the Foundations of complete the additional academic credits American Law program or completion necessary to fulfill the requirements of the of the required course for international Taxation LL.M. degree. Regardless of the students, U.S. Legal Discourse I, unless number of qualifying tax credits completed this requirement has been waived, in during the J.D. phase of the program,

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 64 Graduate Programs following conferral of the J.D. degree, all completion of the final year, students are students are required to complete an addi- awarded a Certificate in American Legal tional 12 credits, of which at least 8 must English. Students in the two year program be tax credits. Students may complete these are eligible to receive any specialized degree additional credits on a full-time or part-time or certificate for which they satisfy the basis. Joint degree students are expected requirements. to complete their LL.M. credits within two years of receiving their J.D. degree. Requirements for Two Separate For students in this program, all of the LL.M. Degrees qualifying tax credits that they take while Students who wish to complete two separate completing their J.D. degree will be shown LL.M. degrees may apply to do so. Current on their LL.M. transcript, along with the students should submit an updated applica- additional courses taken during the LL.M. tion to the Associate Dean for Graduate phase of the program, and all of these Programs, who will consult with the Office courses will be counted toward the student’s of Admissions. No application fee is required LL.M. grade point average. (Taxation I, for current students. which is a prerequisite to matriculation in the Tax LL.M. program, may not be included Transfer between LL.M. Degree among the 12 J.D. credits counted toward Programs the LL.M. degree.) A student in an LL.M. degree program may Georgetown students apply to the J.D./ apply to transfer to a different program LL.M. joint degree in the spring semester by submitting to the Associate Dean for before the start of their final year and must Graduate Programs or the Director of have completed or be enrolled in Taxation I LL.M. Academic Services a written request at the time of their application. Students who explaining the academic reasons for are enrolled as J.D. students in other ABA- requesting the transfer. approved schools are eligible to participate in this program provided they spend the final year of their J.D. studies as a visiting student CERTIFICATE PROGRAM at Georgetown. These students must apply REQUIREMENTS for the LL.M. at the same time as they apply Certificate programs offer students an to visit and must have completed a basic opportunity to concentrate within one of the course in federal income tax by the time of designated fields of study. The Law Center their application. will award no more than one Certificate at the time an LL.M. degree is conferred. Any The Extended LL.M. Program student who has satisfied the requirements for more than one Certificate must desig- and Certificate in American nate the Certificate he or she would like to Legal English receive. With the permission of the Associate A student enrolled in the Extended LL.M. is Dean for Graduate Programs, a student who required to be a full-time student for two full has received an LL.M. from Georgetown academic years. The first year of the program may enroll in the Employee Benefits Law, is a structured program of required courses. Estate Planning, Human Rights Law, or Regular and punctual attendance is manda- National Security Law Certificate program tory and any student who does not meet this as a separate, free-standing program. If the requirement or who fails to demonstrate a student has completed some of the specializa- seriousness of purpose may be terminated tion credits for the Certificate, the student from the program. Following successful

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 65 may request permission to carry those credits Certificate in Estate Planning into the Certificate program. The Estate Planning Certificate is available to students enrolled in a Law Center LL.M. Certificate in Employee degree program and to students who are not Benefits Law so enrolled but who were admitted sepa- The Employee Benefits Law Certificate is rately to the Certificate program. Successful available to students enrolled in a Law completion of a basic course in federal Center LL.M. degree program and to individual income taxation and a course students who are not so enrolled but who in decedents’ estates (or its equivalent) are were admitted separately to the Certificate prerequisites to commencing work on the program. Successful completion of a basic Estate Planning Certificate. course in federal individual income taxation is a prerequisite to commencing work on the The following are requirements for the Estate Employee Benefits Law Certificate. Planning Certificate: • Candidates must successfully complete The following are requirements for the the following three courses: Introduction Employee Benefits Law Certificate: to Private Wealth Planning: The Estate • Candidates must successfully complete and Gift Tax (fall semester); Income a minimum of 10 academic credits in Taxation of Trusts and Estates (fall courses listed under Employee Benefits semester); and Advanced Private Wealth Law Certificate in the course schedule. Planning Seminar (spring semester). • Six of the 10 required credits must be • Candidates must complete at least two satisfied by successfully completing the additional academic credits in a tax following three required courses: Retire- course related to estate planning, such ment Plan Qualification Requirements; as tax-exempt organizations, employee Retirement Plans -- Design and Taxation; benefits, partnership taxation, or other and ERISA: The Fiduciary Provisions. subject approved by the Director of the • A minimum grade point average of Graduate Tax Program. “B-”must be attained in the courses • A minimum grade point average of “B-” that are counted toward the Certificate’s must be attained in the courses that are specialization requirements. counted toward the Certificate’s special- For purposes of earning the LL.M. in ization requirements. Taxation, Employee Benefits Law Certificate For purposes of earning the LL.M. in courses will be counted toward the required Taxation, all Estate Planning Certificate academic credits in Taxation. Students who courses will be counted toward the required wish to apply for the Employee Benefits Law academic credits in Taxation. Students who Certificate must do so by the end of the add/ wish to apply for the Estate Planning Certifi- drop period of their last semester before cate must do so by the end of the add/drop graduation. period of their last semester before gradua- tion. Note: Students admitted for the Employee Benefits Law Certificate only (i.e., students Note: Students admitted for the Estate who are not enrolled in an LL.M. degree Planning Certificate only (i.e., students program) are not eligible for graduation with who are not enrolled in an LL.M. degree distinction or the Dean’s List. program) are not eligible for graduation with distinction or the Dean’s List.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 66 Graduate Programs

Certificate in International equivalent course in their home country, Human Rights Law in the case of foreign-educated LL.M. The International Human Rights Law students) or during the first year at the Certificate is available to students enrolled Law Center. This course does not count in a Law Center LL.M. program. The Law toward the 12 specialization credits for Center will not admit students solely for the the program. International Human Rights Law Certificate • Students must successfully complete program. a minimum of 12 academic credits in courses listed under the National The following are requirements for the Security Law Certificate in the course International Human Rights Law Certificate: schedule. • Candidates must successfully complete • As part of the required 12 specialization a basic course in International Law I (or credits, each student must successfully its equivalent) in a J.D. program (or an complete the course “National Security equivalent course in their home country, Law.” in the case of foreign-educated LL.M. • A minimum grade point average of “B-” students) or during the first year at the must be attained in the courses that are Law Center. This course does not count counted toward the Certificate’s special- towards the 12 specialization credits for ization requirements. the program. • Students must successfully complete Certificate in World Trade a minimum of 12 academic credits Organization (WTO) Studies in courses listed under International The WTO Studies Certificate is available to Human Rights Law Certificate in the students earning a J.D. or LL.M. at the Law course schedule. Center. (Students earning an S.J.D. at the • As part of the required 12 specialization Law Center, and students earning graduate credits, each student must successfully degrees in other related subjects at George- complete the basic International Human town University who are eligible to enroll in Rights Law course. courses at the Law Center, may obtain the • A minimum grade point average of “B-” WTO Studies Certificate only by permission must be attained in the courses that are of the Institute of International Economic counted toward the Certificate’s special- Law.) Students will not be admitted solely ization requirements. for the WTO Studies Certificate program. Successful completion of a basic interna- Certificate in National tional law course, either at the Law Center Security Law or elsewhere, is a prerequisite for the WTO The National Security Law Certificate is Studies Certificate, and this qualifying available to students enrolled in a Law course does not count toward the 12 credits Center LL.M. program. The Law Center will required for the WTO Studies Certificate. not admit students solely for the National Security Law Certificate program. The following are requirements for the WTO Studies Certificate: The following are requirements for the • Students who wish to pursue the WTO National Security Law Certificate: Studies Certificate must notify the • Candidates must successfully complete Law Center’s Institute of International a basic course in International Law I (or Economic Law by the end of the second its equivalent) in a J.D. program (or an week of classes in the first semester of

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 67

graduate studies, or, for J.D. students, by • As part of the required 24 credits, the end of the second week of classes in complete one of the following first-year the first semester of their second year. courses, at the candidate’s option: Torts, • Candidates must successfully complete Contracts or Property; 12 academic credits of coursework on • As part of the required 24 credits, WTO-related subjects, selected from complete the designated course in legal specific courses listed as eligible for the research and writing; and WTO Studies Certificate and posted on • Earn a minimum cumulative grade point the website of the Law Center’s Institute average of at least 2.0. of International Economic Law (www. iiel.org). ENROLLMENT AND CREDIT • Students must maintain an overall grade POLICIES point average of “B” or higher. • Students must complete a research paper Period of Study on a WTO law subject approved by the The LL.M. and Certificate programs IIEL. ordinarily must be completed within three • Students must participate in four years from the date of matriculation; extracurricular activities related to however, full-time students are expected to international trade during their course graduate within one year from the date of of study (such as attending a conference, matriculation unless a waiver is granted. A a congressional, administrative or court student may petition the Associate Dean for hearing, or a similar event). Graduate Programs in writing to extend the three-year time limit for up to two additional Note: Academic credit transferred from other years. Permission to extend the period of institutions and/or graduate programs will study will be granted where good cause is not count toward the WTO Studies Certifi- shown and where the student is making cate. satisfactory progress. Where credit for non-degree coursework MASTER OF STUDIES IN LAW has been granted, the maximum period (M.S.L.) of study allowed will be reduced by one semester for every four academic credits Degree Program Requirements granted. The Master of Studies in Law (M.S.L.) degree is open to journalists – defined to Note: The period of study for international include professionals reporting in print, tele- students is limited by U.S. visa restrictions. vision, radio, and Internet media – who have Please see the section below on Special Visa at least two years’ experience in the media Requirements for International Students. and do not have a J.D. degree. Candidates for the M.S.L. degree must: Enrollment for Bar Purposes • Complete a total of 24 academic credits The Law Center’s Graduate Program is not in courses from the J.D. or LL.M. designed as a bar preparation program. curriculum; Accordingly, the Graduate Program does not • As part of the required 24 credits, guarantee enrollment in any course, graduate complete the following first-year courses: or J.D., that Bar authorities may require Civil Procedure and Constitutional as a condition of eligibility to sit for a bar Law I; examination.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 68 Graduate Programs

Duplication of Courses during the Fall and Spring semesters. By the The Graduate Program discourages students end of the add/drop period, students must from repeating courses for which they ensure that they are enrolled in the appro- have previously received credit in another priate number of academic credits required degree program, but recognizes that there to maintain their full-time or part-time may be circumstances where such repeti- status. For example, if a part-time student tion is appropriate. Hence, students are not registers for eight or more academic credits, required to seek permission to take a course he or she will automatically be charged full- that may duplicate previous work. time tuition despite his or her designation as a part-time student. Conferral of the Degree Once a student has completed the require- Transfer Between Full-Time and ments for an LL.M. degree and any Part-Time Status certificate that the student is pursuing, A student in an LL.M. degree program may the student’s final cumulative grade point apply to transfer from full-time to part-time average will be calculated and the degree status, or from part-time to full-time status, and certificate conferred. If a student who subject to visa requirements, by submitting is pursuing a certificate has completed the a written request detailing the reasons for requirements for an LL.M. degree but not requesting the transfer to the Associate Dean the requirements for the certificate, then with for Graduate Programs or the Director of the permission of the Associate Dean for LL.M. Academic Services. Graduate Programs, the student may take the courses necessary to complete the certificate. Note: A student who begins in part-time In this situation, both the degree and the status and transfers to full-time status will certificate will be conferred when the certifi- continue to pay tuition on a per credit basis. cate requirements are completed. A student who transfers from full-time to With the permission of the Associate part-time status may be subject to a tuition Dean for Graduate Programs, a student who equalization fee. has received an LL.M. from Georgetown may enroll in the Employee Benefits Law, Limitations on Academic Estate Planning, Human Rights Law, or Credits Per Semester National Security Law Certificate program Without the prior written approval of the as a separate, free-standing program. If the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, student has completed some of the specializa- full-time students may not enroll in more tion credits for the Certificate, the student than 13 semester hours of academic credit in may request permission to carry those credits any semester, and part-time students may not into the Certificate program. enroll in more than seven semester hours of academic credit in any semester. Full-Time and Part-Time Enrollment Defined Note: No student who is or anticipates being The Graduate Program defines full-time employed more than 20 hours per week enrollment as eight or more semester hours during a semester may enroll for more than of academic credit during the Fall and Spring seven semester hours of academic credit in semesters, and as four or more semester that semester. Deviations from these limita- hours of academic credit during the Summer tions will be approved only under excep- session. Part-time enrollment is seven or tional circumstances. fewer semester hours of academic credit

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 69

Credit for Courses in Credit for Courses in the Graduate School of Georgetown’s London Summer Georgetown University Program LL.M. students may take a maximum of four LL.M. students may take courses in the academic credits in the Graduate School of Georgetown London Summer Program. Georgetown University with the permission However, due to the intensive nature of that from both the Associate Dean for Graduate program, a maximum of four credits will Programs and the professor teaching the count toward an LL.M. degree. Courses graduate course. Students will be enrolled in taken in the London Summer Program courses by the Office of the Registrar during will be included on the student’s transcript the University’s add/drop period on a space and grades earned in these courses will be available basis and with the approval of the included in the student’s grade point average. academic department. Course descriptions may be found in the catalog of the Graduate Credits Earned at Other School. Institutions Undergraduate level courses cannot be With the prior approval of the Associate applied toward an LL.M. degree or Certifi- Dean for Graduate Programs, and subject cate. Language classes may be taken on a to the conditions listed below, a student space-available basis, but they will not be may apply to the LL.M. degree a cumulative credited towards the LL.M. degree. maximum of four academic credits earned at Full-time students may take graduate other institutions while an LL.M. student at courses and undergraduate language courses the Law Center. In approving such a request, during the Fall and Spring semesters without the Associate Dean will consider the institu- additional charge. Part-time students pay tion at which the student proposes to take for all courses at the applicable Law Center the course, the level of the proposed course, credit hour rate. Full-time or part-time and how the proposed course or courses fit students taking Summer Main Campus into the student’s overall academic program. courses are billed at the applicable Main The Law Center does not award LL.M. Campus tuition rate. All courses, credits, credit for courses taken at another institution and grades taken in the Graduate School will before a student matriculated at the Law appear on the student’s Law Center tran- Center. script, but the grades will not be counted in Credits for course work and grades the student’s grade point average. earned at another ABA-approved law school LL.M. students are limited to four and accepted for credit toward a George- total credits outside of the Law Center. Any town LL.M. degree by the Associate Dean credits taken in the Graduate School of for Graduate Programs will be entered on Georgetown University are subtracted from the Georgetown transcript but will not be the number of credits that can be taken at taken into account in the computation of another institution (see below). a student’s grade point average at the Law Center. Note: International students considering Even if prior approval is obtained for taking a U.S. bar exam should be aware taking a course at another ABA-approved that non-Law Center courses may not count law school, students who do not receive a towards the required number of law credits minimum grade of “C+” in the course will necessary to be eligible to take the bar exam. not be allowed to transfer the academic credits.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 70 Graduate Programs

Credits earned at other institutions will time students, the maximum period of study count toward the specialization requirement allowed will be reduced by one semester if for any degree or certificate program only four or more credits are applied. with the prior approval of the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs. Note: This section does not apply to students LL.M. students are limited to four who are admitted into a joint J.D./LL.M. total credits outside of the Law Center. program. Any credits taken at another institution are subtracted from the number of credits Graduate Independent that can be taken in the Graduate School of Research Georgetown University (see above). Graduate students may undertake a Graduate Independent Research project Advanced Standing for during their degree program. To undertake Graduate Credits Earned as a Graduate Independent Research project, a a Non-Degree Student at student must first identify a faculty member Georgetown Law with relevant expertise who is willing Students in an LL.M. degree program may to supervise the project. After agreeing apply up to eight non-degree academic upon a topic, the student and the faculty credits that were earned at the Law Center supervisor both sign the registration form within two academic years prior to matricu- available from the Office of the Registrar, the lation in the degree program. Courses and Graduate Programs Office, or the web pages grades will be entered on the transcript, and of either the Graduate Programs Office or the grades for those courses will be included the Registrar. The registration form is due in the computation of the LL.M. grade point no later than the first day of class of each average. The maximum period of study semester. allowed for the degree will be reduced by one All requests to do a Graduate Indepen- semester for every four academic credits of dent Research project must be approved by advanced standing that are applied. the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs and approval is not automatic. Students Advanced Standing for Credit must demonstrate that they have a well- developed topic suitable for a substantial Earned as a J.D. Student at scholarly paper. In addition, Graduate Georgetown Law Independent Research projects will usually Students who received their J.D. degree from be approved only if the topic of the project the Law Center within three years of matric- is not adequately addressed in a course or ulating in an LL.M. degree program may seminar. Ordinarily, students are limited to apply up to six academic credits earned while one Graduate Independent Research project a J.D. student, provided those credits were during their degree program, but a second in excess of the minimum number of credits project may be approved by the Associate required for the J.D. degree. Courses and Dean for Graduate Programs. grades involved will remain part of the J.D. The student and faculty supervisor must record; advanced standing credit for specific meet regularly to discuss the project. The courses will be applied to the LL.M. degree. student must submit an outline and a draft The courses and grades will be entered on to the faculty supervisor for review and the transcript, but grades for those courses comment on an agreed upon schedule. The will not be included in the computation of final paper must be submitted to the Office the LL.M. grade point average. For part- of the Registrar, not directly to the professor.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 71

The final paper must be submitted by the in a course (permitted only when announced date set in the approved proposal, which in the course schedule) must also meet this may be no later than 60 days in the Fall minimum standard. semester or 45 days in the Spring semester beyond the date set for paper submission in Three-Credit Seminars the academic calendar, except that students The three-credit seminars offered in the in their final semester must submit the paper Graduate Program allow a student the by the date announced in the academic opportunity to write a paper under close calendar for graduating students. Students faculty supervision. Students receive who do not receive the approval of the comments on their outlines and first drafts Associate Dean for Graduate Programs for and then edit and rewrite to produce a extensions beyond the maximum or who polished final paper. Three-credit seminars fail to submit a final paper by the due date meet two hours per week. The extra credit (including any extension) will be withdrawn that these seminars receive reflects the from the Graduate Independent Research additional time and work that students are project. The withdrawal will be reflected as a expected to devote to their papers. “W” in the student’s transcript. The papers that students write for these The standard GIR project receives two seminars should show the student’s mastery credits and requires a paper of at least 6,000 of the in-depth research undertaken and words of text excluding footnotes (about demonstrate how the student has organized, 25 pages). Many GIR papers are longer clarified, or advanced this body of knowl- than this minimum. Students seeking to do edge in resolving the issues raised by the a major paper of publishable quality may paper. The technical requirements for a paper request a three credit GIR. The three credit in a three-credit seminar include: (1) submis- GIR requires a paper of at least 10,000 sion of an outline and a first draft, in accor- words of text excluding footnotes (about 40 dance with the professor’s instructions and pages). A three credit GIR must be approved schedule; (2) submission of a revised final as such in advance by the Associate Dean for paper based on the professor’s comments; Graduate Programs. Absent such advance and (3) a final paper consisting of at least approval, a two credit GIR for which the 6,000 words (excluding footnotes), which is student submits a paper of 40 or more pages approximately 25 typewritten pages using will not be converted to a three credit GIR. customary margins and spacing.

Note: International students considering One Paper for Two Seminars taking a U.S. bar exam should be aware that Students may submit one paper to satisfy Graduate Independent Research may not the requirements in two seminars or writing count towards the required number of law projects by securing the written approval of credits necessary to be eligible to take the bar both professors and the Associate Dean for exam. Graduate Programs in advance of writing the paper. When permission is granted, the Two-Credit Seminars student will be required to write a paper of The two-credit seminars offered in the at least 12,000 words excluding footnotes Graduate Program require a substantial (approximately 50 pages), and meet all other research paper, or a series of shorter papers, requirements of both seminars. Students will totaling approximately 6,000 words of be expected to indicate the joint nature of the text excluding footnotes (about 25 pages). paper on the cover page of all submissions. Papers submitted in lieu of an examination Each professor approving such a project

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 72 Graduate Programs independently will submit a final grade submitted on a weekly basis to the Extern- indicating his or her judgment of the paper ship Coordinator. At the end of the semester, as it pertains to his or her course, and the the student will be required to submit a five- final grades given for the two seminars need to ten-page paper reflecting on the externship not be identical. experience. Students may not submit a single paper for a seminar and a GIR project. Students Note: Although LL.M. students may receive also may not submit a single paper to satisfy academic credit only once for an externship the requirements of two GIR projects. during their LL.M. program, they are free to participate in other non-credit internships, LL.M. Externship Program subject to visa rules and the Law Center’s The Law Center offers a “for-credit” extern- regulations on student employment. ship program course for LL.M. students each Spring semester. All current LL.M. students ATTENDANCE AND EVALUATION are eligible to participate in the externship POLICIES program, except for COST Scholars (who participate in a separate externship program at COST). Attendance and Participation Although the Office of Graduate The Law Center must be satisfied at all times Programs maintains a list of externship of the serious purpose of each student. Any opportunities, students are responsible for student will be withdrawn if it is found that securing their own placements. The work the student is not giving proper time and must be legal in nature and under the direct attention to his or her studies. supervision of a lawyer. To be eligible for Regular and punctual attendance at all credit, students may not receive pay or other class sessions is required of each student. compensation from the placement organiza- Student participation is expected in all tion during the externship period. courses. A student who, even though regis- LL.M. students who participate in the tered for a course, has not regularly attended for-credit program will receive two credits and participated may, at the professor’s graded on a pass/fail basis. The LL.M. option, be withdrawn, excluded from the student must be registered for the two credits course or examination (with the same in order to participate in the program and consequences as a voluntary failure to appear these two credits will count toward the for a final examination), or receive a lowered maximum of 13 academic credits allowed grade in the course. Even if a student has per semester. passed all examinations, academic credit LL.M. externs are required to attend will not be awarded and no student will an orientation class in the first week of the be advanced, nor will his or her degree be Spring semester and at least one additional conferred, if attendance or participation is class or meeting at the end of the Spring unsatisfactory. semester. LL.M. students are then required A student who has not properly regis- to devote a minimum of ten hours per week tered for a course may not take the final for at least eleven weeks to the externship. examination or receive any credit for partici- Students must keep a weekly diary that pation in the course. reflects the number of hours the student has worked and describes the nature of the Examinations work performed without disclosing any Written examinations are held at the end of confidential information. This diary must be the class work in all courses unless otherwise

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 73 indicated on the course schedule. No exami- transcript. A student who presents himself nation will be given prior to its originally or herself for examination in a course but scheduled date and time. Curricular offer- fails to submit that examination for grading ings designated as “seminars” generally do will receive a grade of “F” for that course. not have examinations; instead, substantial No post-examination relief will be granted. written work is required. Clinical programs If a student becomes ill during the examina- do not have written final examinations. tion, the student must immediately make the The Law Center requires students to proctor aware of the situation and follow the take their examinations at the regularly instructions of the proctor or Registrar. scheduled time. Dates for all examina- No re-examination will be given in any tions are announced at the time the course course for the purpose of raising a grade schedule is released so that students may obtained in a previous final examination in anticipate the date of their examinations and that course. schedule personal, travel and employment Students may review their graded exams commitments so as not to interfere with the during specified exam review periods by announced dates of their examinations. If, completing a request form from the Office however, a student experiences a serious of the Registrar. The Library contains copies medical or personal situation that makes it of past examinations administered at the impossible to take an examination on the Law Center. Students may use these prior scheduled date, it is the student’s responsi- examinations as study aids in preparing bility to determine, in consultation with the for examinations. In many cases, model or Registrar, whether he or she should request “best” answers to past examinations are also a deferred examination. (See Exam Deferral on file in the Library. Policy in the General Administrative Policies section of this Bulletin.) Written Work A student failing to present himself Final papers in seminars and other courses or herself for any examination because of are normally due on the date announced in illness or other extraordinary cause must the academic calendar. By announcement at contact the Registrar prior to the start of the beginning of the semester, a professor the examination. If the Registrar is satisfied may advance or extend for up to a maximum that the absence is legitimate and supported of 60 days in the Fall semester and 45 days by appropriate documentation (such as a in the Spring semester the due date of all doctor’s note), permission may be given for papers for the seminar (except for those of the student to take a deferred examination. graduating students). All final papers must be The requirements of a student’s employment submitted to the Office of the Registrar and will not be regarded as an “extraordinary not to the professor. cause.” If the Registrar does not permit a Due dates for papers are as firm as the deferral, the student must take the examina- dates of examinations. Individual exten- tion as originally scheduled or be withdrawn sions for less than the maximum allowable from the course. (mentioned above) may be granted by the Any student who does not take an professor, provided the student submits an examination as originally scheduled, and Individual Extension Form to the Office who does not obtain permission from the of the Registrar. The form, available at the Registrar prior to the start of an examina- Office of the Registrar, must be signed by tion to take a deferred examination, will be the professor. Extensions for more than the withdrawn from the course. The withdrawal maximum are rare and not granted solely will be reflected as a “W” on the student’s by the professor. Any request for an exten-

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 74 Graduate Programs sion beyond the maximum is effective only If a student repeats a failed course, upon review and signature of the Individual both grades will be entered on the student’s Extension Form by the Associate Dean for transcript and will be included for the Graduate Programs. purpose of determining the cumulative grade If a student fails to submit a final paper point average of the student. Any student by the due date (including any extension), accumulating three failures will be dismissed the student will be withdrawn from the for defective scholarship. course or seminar. The withdrawal will be reflected as a “W” on the student’s tran- Grade Review Policies script. Once a final paper is submitted for Any student who has received a failing grading, a revised version of that paper may grade on an examination or paper, after first not be substituted for the final paper. discussing the matter with the professor who submitted the failing grade, may request Note: for International Students: U.S. visa the Registrar to submit that examination restrictions dictate that extending the paper or paper for review by another professor due date beyond the expected date of gradu- teaching in the field. The other professor ation as listed in the certificate of eligibility serves merely in a consulting capacity. The (I-20 or DS-2019 form) can be permitted final decision for the course grade rests only for compelling academic and/or medical with the professor conducting the course, reasons. Any such paper extension must but the course professor shall give due and be approved in writing by an international appropriate consideration to the views of the student advisor in the Office of Graduate consulting colleague. A request for review Programs in consultation with the Associate must be made by the student within the Dean for Graduate Programs in advance of time period allowed for review of students’ the paper submission deadline. The faculty examinations and papers. Only grades of member must agree to the extension but “F” may be reviewed. cannot grant the extension. Grade Change Policy Grading A faculty member may change a reported Final grades are given on a letter system: passing grade for an examination or paper A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-, D and F. A few only upon proof of demonstrable clerical courses are graded on an honors/pass/fail error in the grading or grade reporting basis; others are graded pass/fail. process.

The following numerical equivalents are Probation assigned to each letter grade: LL.M. students who fail to achieve a 2.00 cumulative grade point average at the end A 4.00 C+ 2.33 of any semester will be placed on academic A- 3.67 C 2.00 probation. If the student’s cumulative grade B+ 3.33 C- 1.67 point average remains below 2.00 after the B 3.00 D 1.00 next semester in residence (after at least four B- 2.67 F 0 credits of coursework), he or she will be dismissed for defective scholarship. A minimum cumulative grade point average of 2.00 in all courses and seminars taken is required each semester a student is enrolled in the LL.M. program.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 75

Ranking of Students will be excluded from the computation of The Law Center does not provide ranking this average. Dean’s List designation will be information with respect to its students’ granted only where a student has completed academic performance, whether in an S.J.D., a minimum of 20 academic credits in an LL.M. or J.D. degree program. LL.M. degree program at the Law Center.

Pass/Fail Option Not Available Note: The difference between graduation The pass/fail option (available to students with distinction and Dean’s List is that in the J.D. program) is not available to graduation with distinction is calculated S.J.D. or LL.M. students. However, LL.M. based upon the entire graduating LL.M. class students enrolled in the Externship Program and then printed on the diploma and the are graded on a pass/fail basis, and certain student’s transcript, whereas Dean’s List is LL.M. courses open exclusively to foreign- calculated based upon the graduating class trained lawyers, including U.S. Legal within each respective LL.M. degree program Discourse and U.S. Legal Methods, may be and then printed on the student’s transcript graded on an honors/pass/fail basis. only.

Academic Honors THE THOMAS BRADBURY CHETWOOD, S.J., PRIZES Founded by the Law Center Class of 1928, GRADUATING WITH DISTINCTION these prizes are given in honor of Reverend To graduate with distinction, an LL.M. Thomas B. Chetwood, S.J., a former Regent student must attain a minimum cumulative of the Law Center. Plaques are awarded to grade point average that places the student the students who both graduate with distinc- in the top one-third of the entire graduating tion and have the best academic records for LL.M. class. Grades transferred from any that academic year in the following LL.M. other law school, while displayed on the degree programs: International Business and Law Center transcript, will be excluded from Economic Law, International Legal Studies, the computation of this average. Distinction Global Health Law, Securities and Financial will be granted only where a student has Regulation, and Taxation. At the discre- completed a minimum of 20 academic credits tion of the Associate Dean for Graduate in an LL.M. degree program at the Law Programs, a prize may be awarded for the Center. most outstanding work in an approved indi- vidualized Master of Laws program and for DEAN’S LIST an international student in a general studies An LL.M. student who graduates in the top Master of Laws program. one-third of the graduating students in his or her specific LL.M. degree program will be designated as a Dean’s List graduate for OTHER PROVISIONS that specific LL.M. degree program. Dean’s List designation will be granted for the Specific Visa Reporting following LL.M. degree programs: Individu- Requirements for International alized, International Business and Economic Students Law, International Legal Studies, General By provision of federal law, any school Studies, Global Health Law, Securities and that enrolls foreign nationals is required to Financial Regulation, and Taxation. Grades comply with strict reporting requirements. transferred from any other law school, while Before the start of each semester, all newly displayed on the Law Center transcript, enrolled international students (including

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 76 Graduate Programs

U.S. permanent residents) at the Law Center time during the academic year. Experience are required to provide documentation indicates that a student frequently cannot proving they are legally permitted to be in successfully carry a full-time course load if the country and attend school. Students substantially employed in an outside job. who fail to provide such documentation Devoting too much time to employment is will not be permitted to complete registra- a frequent cause of disappointing academic tion or attend classes. Students in F-1 or J-1 performance and sometimes of academic status are additionally required to attend failure. For these reasons, professional a Visa Information Session given by the organizations, including accrediting agencies, Graduate Programs Office. The Graduate require that a student enrolling in the Programs Office will provide all new inter- full-time program be in a position to devote national students with detailed information substantially all of his or her working hours concerning the time, date, and location of the to the study of law. session prior to the start of the semester. Visa The Law Center strongly urges full-time and regulatory information is also available students not to accept outside employment. at the Graduate Programs website at: www. All full-time students should carefully restrict law.georgetown.edu/intl/visa.html. their hours of employment and in no event may a full-time student exceed 20 hours of Tuition employment per week during the academic See the Tuition & Fees section of the year. A student enrolled in the full-time Bulletin. program who is contemplating substantial Note: Full-time LL.M. students who have employment should request a transfer to paid for two consecutive semesters of the part-time program, which is structured full-time tuition but who have not completed to accommodate those who have significant their degree requirements, may request employment responsibilities during their permission from the Associate Dean for period of study at the Law Center. Graduate Programs to complete their degree requirements without payment of additional Note: International students in the U.S. on tuition. Even if permission is granted, student visas are very restricted with respect students will be charged on a per-credit basis to on- and off-campus employment and for credits in excess of the minimum number must get prior written permission from the necessary to complete the degree. Visa Advisor. Students cannot rely on the possibility of on-campus employment when Students Auditing Courses determining their financial resources for the Enrolled degree students may audit addi- year. www.law.georgetown.edu/intl/visa. tional courses with the permission of the html. professors at no additional charge. Non- degree students desiring to audit a course Student Conduct in the Job must pay the usual per-credit fee. Auditors Search Process receive no transcript notation of their atten- Students are expected to exhibit high dance in class. standards of professional responsibility in all of their job-seeking activities. Students Restrictions on Student are cautioned to avoid even the appearance Employment of impropriety in the preparation of their The program of instruction in the full-time job resumes, letters and application forms. program is a demanding one designed to Misleading, inaccurate, or false informa- command substantially all of the student’s tion on these materials is a violation of the

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Graduate Programs 77

Student Disciplinary Code. Students are After the fourth week of the semester, a expected to attend all scheduled interviews, withdrawal will be considered “excused” unless cancelled in a timely and appropriate only under exceptional circumstances. manner. Students should view the acceptance If a student properly withdraws from of an offer, whether for a paid or unpaid a course or from the Law Center under position, as a binding commitment. Failure the preceding rules, refunds of tuition will to honor commitments may have implica- be calculated, from the date the Office of tions for the student’s reputation and that of the Registrar receives written notification, the Law Center. If unusual or extenuating according to the Tuition Refund Schedule circumstances arise following an acceptance listed in the Tuition and Fees section of this of an offer, students should consult with Bulletin. a career advisor at the Law Center before taking actions that may violate this policy. Leaves of Absence LL.M. students in good standing, both Post-Graduation Employment academically and financially, may request a The professional development staff of the leave of absence for up to one academic year Office of Graduate Programs assists students from the Registrar or the Associate Dean in identifying potential employment oppor- for Graduate Programs, or the Director of tunities. However, all of the steps in securing LL.M. Academic Services. A leave of absence employment are ultimately the responsibility of longer than one year will be granted only of each student and the Law Center does not in exceptional circumstances. The student guarantee that a graduate from its LL.M. requesting the leave must demonstrate that program will secure post-graduation employ- the degree can be completed within the ment. allowed period of study, counting the time on leave of absence. See also Period of Study. WITHDRAWAL AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE POLICIES Withdrawal from the Law Center Voluntary Withdrawal from Students may voluntarily withdraw from the Individual Courses Law Center (as opposed to taking a leave A graduate student may voluntarily of absence) at any time. Students who wish withdraw from any course or regular to voluntarily withdraw should notify the seminar at any time prior to the examina- Registrar in writing of their decision. Once tion period, unless the professor has set, withdrawn, a student no longer is matricu- in writing, a different rule for withdrawal. lated at the Law Center. A student who has In order to effect a withdrawal from an withdrawn and then wishes to return to individual course, a student must submit a the Law Center must apply for readmission request in writing to the Office of the Regis- through the regular admissions process. trar. All students are urged to consult with an Students who have been absent from the academic advisor before withdrawing from Law Center longer than an approved leave a course. In addition, because of U.S. visa of absence, or who have failed to maintain regulations, all international students who matriculation by interrupting their course of wish to withdraw from a course must first study without having received approval for a obtain written approval from the Director of leave of absence in advance, will be involun- International Student Services in the Office tarily withdrawn and must reapply through of Graduate Programs. A withdrawal is the regular admissions process if they wish to recorded on a student’s transcript either as a seek readmission to the Law Center. “withdrawal” or an “excused withdrawal.”

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 78 Graduate Programs

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY eight academic credits for coursework with The faculty expects all students to conduct a “C” or better completed at the Law Center themselves with the highest degree of during the two years immediately preceding honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. The the student’s entry into the degree program. faculty has promulgated standards and The maximum period of study allowed for procedures that govern the disposition of completion of the LL.M. will be reduced by cases (fortunately rare) in which a student’s one semester for every four academic credits conduct is dishonest or evidences a lack of of non-degree coursework counted under this integrity or trustworthiness or may unfairly rule. impinge upon the rights or privileges of members of the Law Center community. Note: Enrollment is on a space-available Those standards and procedures are set forth basis with enrollment priority given to degree in the Student Disciplinary Code, in the candidates. Conduct Policies section of this Bulletin.

NON-DEGREE ENROLLMENT Attorneys who wish to take courses in a particular field may apply for admission as non-degree students. To be considered for acceptance into this program, students must hold a J.D. or LL.M. degree from an ABA-approved law school with at least a “C+” cumulative grade point average or an LL.M. from Georgetown. Students who do not have a degree from a U.S. law school but who have a law degree from outside the U.S. will be considered for admission on a case by case basis. Students accepted into the non-degree program are not candidates for a graduate degree. Non-degree students may enroll in a total of no more than four graduate courses or a maximum of eight credit hours, and may take no more than two courses per semester. Non-degree students must satisfy the same academic requirements and abide by the same Law Center rules and policies as candidates for graduate degrees. Non-degree students are not eligible to enroll in J.D. level courses unless they are Law Center graduates. Non-degree students cannot enroll in J.D. first-year or clinical courses, nor can they enroll in a program of Graduate Independent Research. Students in the non-degree program who subsequently apply for and are accepted into a degree program will be awarded up to

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin General Administrative Policies 79

APPLICATION TO GRADUATE 81

AUDIO-RECORDING OF CLASSES 81

BAR ADMISSIONS, EXAMINATIONS AND REVIEW 84

THE CRIME AWARENESS AND CAMPUS 84 SECURITY ACT OF 1990

EXAM DEFERRAL POLICY 84 t ive Policies

HEALTH INSURANCE 86

HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY ACT: CONSEQUENCES 86 OF DRUG CONVICTION ON YOUR ABILITY TO RECEIVE FEDERAL FINANCIAL AID

I.D. CARDS 87

MYACCESS 87 G eneral Ad minis t ra REGISTRATION FOR COURSES 87

STUDENT RECORDS, ACADEMIC 88

STUDENT RECORDS, ACCESS 88

STUDENT RECORDS, DIRECTORY INFORMATION AND 88 CONFIDENTIALITY

STUDENT WORK, CONFIDENTIALITY 89

TRANSCRIPTS 89

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 79 80 General Administrative Policies

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin General Administrative Policies 81 These general administrative policies apply to all students. APPLICATION TO GRADUATE POLICY FOR AUDIO-RECORDING Students anticipating graduation must OF CLASSES submit to the Office of the Registrar a ADOPTED BY THE FACULTY, APRIL 25, degree application. Students are respon- 2008 sible for obtaining a degree application to graduate at the Office of the Registrar in A. STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS sufficient time to meet the filing deadline. 1. Recording by Students: Consistent with Students are responsible for moni- our mission of training lawyers who act with toring their progress to ensure they meet the highest standards of honesty, integrity all degree requirements by their antici- and trustworthiness, and with respect for the pated graduation date. Regardless of the legitimate interests of others, students are not completion of all academic requirements, a permitted to record a class themselves by any diploma will not be issued until the student means without prior express authorization has a clear student account balance. In of the faculty member. Violation of this rule addition, transcripts, diplomas, bar certi- may be deemed a violation of the Student fication and other certificates will not be Disciplinary Code. released if there is an outstanding student account balance, or if a student who has 2. Recording by the Law Center: The received financial aid has not fulfilled the Law Center will record classes and make federal requirement for a financial aid exit those recordings available to students only interview. under the following circumstances and only On the degree application, students if permitted by the faculty member: provide information necessary to order diplomas and prepare the commencement a. Recording by the Law Center for book: Individual Students: All students are expected to attend class regularly and to February 2010 graduates: miss class only in exceptional circumstances. Deadline October 16, 2009 Therefore, the Law Center will record classes for individual students only for the reasons May 2010 graduates: set forth below and only with the approval Deadline January 29, 2010 of the appropriate Law Center administrator. Recording for individual students will be October 2010 graduates: authorized only in the following situations: Deadline April 16, 2010 (1) serious medical situation or family emergency; (2) religious observance; (3) to provide reasonable accommodation for a student with a disability, after consultation with the Coordinator of Disability Services; *

* Notwithstanding the Standards for Faculty set forth in the next section, the Law Center will audio-record even without faculty permission, with prior notice to the faculty member, where audio-recording is required by law as a reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities. Due to concerns about client confidential- ity and attorney-client privilege, the recording of clinical classes will be handled slightly differently. Clinic classes will be recorded through the use of either video tape or MP3 technology in the classroom, rather than through a centralized computer recording system. Clinical faculty will handle the distribution of any

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 82 General Administrative Policies

(4) sanctioned participation in a Law this provision, the recording will be Center approved moot court event held made available to all students enrolled out of town; in the course in streaming audio format, (5) appearance in court in connection but students are prohibited from down- with a clinic in which the student is loading the recording to a computer or enrolled; other electronic device, or distributing (6) rescheduled class; the recording or any portion thereof. (7) other comparably urgent reasons, and not including job interviews, vacation 3. Distribution of Recordings Made by plans, minor illness, or work conflicts. Students — Permission, Downloading and Distribution: If a student receives Students submit requests for the permission from a member of the faculty to audio-recording of classes through the record a class using equipment not provided online request form located at http://www. by the law school, downloading such a law.georgetown.edu/ist/ (click on the link recording to a computer or other electronic then select Audio Recording of Classes device, distributing such a recording to any on the left). These requests are directed other person or using the recording for any to the office of J.D. Academic Services or purpose other than the student’s own educa- LL.M. Academic Services, as the case may tion is not allowed without express permis- be. Recording that is done pursuant to an sion of the relevant member of the faculty. approved request of an individual student Unauthorized downloading or distribution will be made available only to that student of all or any portion of a permitted recording in streaming audio format. Students who may be deemed a violation of the Student receive or are provided access to a Law Disciplinary Code. Center recording of a class under this section are prohibited from downloading* the 4. Retention of Recordings Made by recording to a computer or other electronic the Law Center: The default rule is that device, or distributing the recording or any class recordings made by the institution are portion thereof to anyone. only available to authorized students for 28 days after the date of the original recording. b. Recording by the Law Center for Recording will be retained for longer the Entire Class: On occasion, the periods: Law Center will record a class or classes and make the recording available to a. if a faculty member requests that a all students enrolled in that class. Such recording or recordings not be destroyed recording may be done at the request for some period of time; or of an appropriate Law Center adminis- b. if the original circumstance for recording trator on occasions when severe weather the class continues to exist AND the or similar conditions make it difficult student asks the appropriate admin- for large numbers of students safely to istrator at least three days before the come to the Law Center. Such recording recording would normally be destroyed may also be done at the request of the to retain the recording. Retention under faculty. When classes are recorded under recordings to students and will supervise the storage and “shredding” of any recordings containing privileged information.

* Throughout this policy, “downloading” means “receiving and saving” the recording instead of receiv- ing the recording via audio format for the purposes of listening.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin General Administrative Policies 83

this provision may be allowed for no with a recording of a class session(s) in more than 14 additional days. streaming audio format only under certain limited circumstances. The policy is an 5. Recordings Authorized by a Member “OPT-IN” system for faculty. That is, classes of the Faculty: Nothing in this policy bars are recorded by the Law Center and the a member of the faculty from authorizing recording is released to a student only with any of her or his classes to be recorded either the affirmative agreement of the relevant by students or by the Law Center, streamed member of the faculty. In the absence of a to students, downloaded or distributed. If a statement allowing recording of classes, the member of the faculty authorizes any such default position is that classes will not be actions, she or he may impose restrictions recorded. * on the classes to be recorded, the students 2. Online Implementation: Unless a given access to the recordings, the extent member of the faculty has requested that a of downloading and distribution allowed class or a series of classes be recorded, the and the length of time the recordings will policy for institutional recording of classes at be retained. In the absence of any express the request of a student will be implemented limitation imposed by a member of the online. As noted above, students go online to faculty, no recording of a class may ever be request that a particular class be recorded. If made available to any person not registered permission is granted the student is notified in the course. and given authority to access a particular recording. Caveats: Recording may be limited by avail- Similarly every member of the faculty able technology or demand, by equipment will be asked to fill out a recording prefer- failure or human error; this policy is not a ence form online each semester. The online guarantee of successful recording. Record- faculty preference form will contain these ings will be provided or made available options: under the circumstances, in the manner and for the time period to be specified by the Law 1. All the class meetings of your course(s) Center. will be recorded, but the Law Center will only approve the release of a B. STANDARDS FOR FACULTY recording(s) to enrolled students meeting one of the limited circum- 1. Default Rule for Recordings Made by stances set forth in the Recording the Law Center: This policy limits unau- Policy for Students (e.g., serious thorized student recording, downloading and medical situation, religious observance distribution of class recordings. Under the or family emergency). policy, IST will audio record a class when authorized and students will be provided

* Notwithstanding the Standards for Faculty set forth in the next section, the Law Center will audio- record even without faculty permission, with prior notice to the faculty member, where audio-recording is required by law as a reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities. Due to concerns about client confidentiality and attorney-client privilege, the recording of clinical classes will be handled slightly differently. Clinic classes will be recorded through the use of either video tape or MP3 technology in the classroom, rather than through a centralized computer recording system. Clinical faculty will handle the distribution of any recordings to students and will supervise the storage and “shredding” of any record- ings containing privileged information.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 84 General Administrative Policies

2. The Law Center will only record class It is the student’s responsibility to meetings of your course(s) in response become familiar with the rules and proce- to a student request which the Law dures, including the investigation of char- Center has determined meets one of the acter and other qualifications, that pertain limited circumstances set forth in the to the state where he or she plans to sit for Recording Policy for Students. the bar examination. Early investigation of these matters is important. The Office of 3. All the class meetings of your course(s) the Registrar has contact and other relevant will be recorded and your students will information for all state bars online at: www. have access without needing to seek law.georgetown.edu/registrar/bar.html. As approval from the Law Center. a rule, questions should be resolved with appropriate authorities at the particular state 4. No class recordings will be made, bar admissions offices. Access to state bar except for those class meetings that admission offices may be found at: www. conflict with a religious observance. ncbex.org. The Law Center’s Ethics Counsel, Michael Frisch, (202) 662-9926, will advise 5. NO class recordings will be made for students on issues regarding disclosures on any reason. No recordings will be made bar applications or other concerns about the for classes that conflict with a religious admissions process. observance or for any of the other reasons for which students may request THE CRIME AWARENESS AND access under this policy. CAMPUS SECURITY ACT OF 1990 This law requires the University to prepare 3. Recording at Request of or With the information on current campus law enforce- Permission of a Member of the Faculty: ment policies, crime prevention programs, Nothing in this policy bars a member of and campus security statistics. The infor- the faculty from authorizing any of her or mation is available upon request from the his classes to be recorded by either students Director of Public Safety, Georgetown or the Law Center, provided to students in University Law Center, 600 New Jersey streaming audio format, downloaded or Avenue, NW, Room 101, Washington, DC distributed in accordance with paragraph 5 20001-2075, (202) 662-9312. The 2008 of the student policy described above. edition of the Crime Awareness and Campus Security Report (which reports crime statis- BAR ADMISSIONS, tics for the three previous calendar years) is EXAMINATIONS AND REVIEW available for review electronically at: Each state has promulgated rules that www.law.georgetown.edu/publicsafety/ govern eligibility to sit for the bar exami- crimestatistics.html. nation and to gain admission to the bar. Common requirements pertain to required EXAM DEFERRAL POLICY courses, minimum course loads and similar The Law Center’s rules for deferred examina- matters. Some states require completion of tions are as follows: courses which are not required by the Law 1. Requests to defer exams will be DENIED Center. Most states require the successful if for: completion of the Multi-State Professional a. Travel, vacation or other personal Responsibility Examination prior to sitting plans for the bar examination. b. Employment reasons for full time J.D. students.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin General Administrative Policies 85

Dates for all examinations are start an exam you must finish it, announced at the time the course so if you feel ill before begin- schedule is released so that students may ning, please contact the Office anticipate the dates of their exams and of the Registrar. If you become schedule personal, travel, and employ- ill during an exam, report to the ment plans that do not interfere with proctor immediately and follow these dates. DO NOT schedule any his/her directions. employment or personal travel plans 2) Death or serious illness in during the examination period. LL.M. immediate family. and part time J.D. students may for 3) Automobile accident, mugging, unavoidable and extraordinary circum- robbery or similar traumatic stances request to have an examination experience at the time of the rescheduled for reasons of employment. exam or period immediately 2. Examinations will be rescheduled for: preceding the exam. a. Exam Conflicts 4) Subpoena requiring court 1) For any student who has two appearance at the time of exam examinations which BEGIN or period immediately preceding within 24 hours. Examinations the exam. which BEGIN more than 25 5) Childbirth that interferes with hours apart (for example, at exam or period immediately 9:00 a.m. on one day and 1:30 preceding the exam (applies to p.m. on the following calendar either parent). day), DO NOT constitute a 6) Religious holiday. conflict under this rule. 7) Military commitment. Written 2) for any student who has three military orders are required. examinations scheduled within 8) Extraordinary family circum- four consecutive days, or four stances, such as the wedding of examinations scheduled within a sibling. five consecutive days. 3. Requests for an exam deferral must be in b. Exam Relief*: Students may request writing. If your file shows that you have exam relief for extraordinary cause. previously deferred one or more exami- The following are reasons which will nations for reasons other than exam be considered in granting relief: conflicts, another deferred examination 1) Illness of Student. If you are will be granted in only the most extraor- seeking a deferred examination dinary circumstances. for medical reasons, a written 4. Requests for exam relief require satis- medical diagnosis from your factory documentation of the reasons. doctor, Student Health, the Law Students should be prepared to provide Center Nurse Practitioner, or complete documentation, which is emergency room is required. All subject to verification and approval. medical certificates are subject 5. To protect your anonymity and remain to verification and approval. in compliance with the Student Disci- Please remember that once you

* Any student who does not take an examination as originally scheduled and who does not obtain permission from the Office of the Registrar to take a deferred examination will be withdrawn from the course. Permission to take a deferred examination must be sought and obtained prior to the original administration of the examination.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 86 General Administrative Policies

plinary Code, students may not indicate HEALTH INSURANCE to the professor(s) that an exam has Law Center students registered in a degree been deferred. Students may not discuss program for 8 or more credits must have the subject of the deferred exam with medical insurance coverage in effect for the the professor or other students after the entire academic year. Students may submit originally scheduled exam date/time. proof of private coverage or purchase insur- Under no circumstances may a student ance through the University. Plans are also initiate communication with the course available for spouse and family coverage. professor(s) about the examination Health insurance rates are posted on the (including anonymous communications) Student Accounts website at: www.law. until grades are posted. georgetown.edu/finaff/studaccts/tuition.html. 6. Some guidelines the Office of the Regis- Georgetown students attending an trar follows in rescheduling examina- off-campus program or visiting at another tions: a. No examination will be given earlier school must provide proof of private than its original date. coverage or they will be covered by the b. An exam conflict does not permit Georgetown plan and the appropriate charge the student to self-schedule examina- will be posted to their student account. tions. Health insurance benefit information and c. The conflicting examination to be acceptance/waiver instructions are on the changed will be determined by the Student Health Insurance web site at: www. Office of the Registrar. georgetown.edu/student-affairs/insurance/. d. In most cases, the conflicting exami- nation which carries the lowest HIGHER EDUCATION number of credits is changed. OPPORTUNITY ACT: e. Students with self-scheduled take- CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG home examinations are responsible for avoiding conflicts with in-class CONVICTION OF YOUR ABILITY examinations. TO RECEIVE FEDERAL FINANCIAL f. Examinations rescheduled because AID of conflicts may be given at any date Students who are convicted under any state during the examination period or on or federal law for possessing or selling a the date listed for deferred examina- controlled substance while they are receiving tions on the academic calendar. a federal grant, loan, or a work study award 7. If, after the Office of the Registrar has will not be eligible to receive the aid for the rescheduled an examination, there is a following time periods, starting from the material change in a student’s examina- date of conviction: tion schedule (i.e., withdrawal from a course, substitution of a take-home Possession Sale examination or a paper option for an in-class examination, etc.) which would 1st Offense 1 year 2 years eliminate the conflict, it is the student’s 2nd Offense 2 years indefinite responsibility under the Student Disci- 3rd Offense indefinite plinary Code, as outlined in the Conduct Policies section of this Bulletin, to notify Students may resume eligibility earlier if the Office of the Registrar of the change they complete a drug rehabilitation program in order to determine whether he or that includes two unannounced drug tests she remains eligible for a rescheduled and otherwise meets Department of Educa- examination.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin General Administrative Policies 87 tion requirements or if the conviction is MYACCESS reversed or set aside. 20 U.S.C. § 1091(r). MyAccess allows each student to view and We encourage you to visit the website print his or her address, class schedule, http://www3.georgetown.edu/be/article. grades, billing statement, and other personal cfm?ObjectID=40589 for more information data, and to forward address changes to regarding Georgetown University policies the Office of the Registrar. Each student is and applicable laws and penalties related assigned a NetID and temporary password to the use, possession and distribution of (which needs to be reset) to gain access to alcohol and other drugs; information about this information. If you lose or forget your the risks and effects of drug and alcohol NetID or password, please contact the Office use and dependence; and resources to assist of the Registrar or the IST Student Help students who may be having a problem with Desk located in the Law Library. alcohol or drugs. REGISTRATION FOR COURSES I.D. CARDS Registration for continuing students takes The Georgetown One Card (GOCard) is the place in April each year for the entire official Georgetown University identifica- upcoming academic year. Faculty, deans, and tion card. All students, faculty and staff other advisors are available for individual affiliated with the University need to carry academic counseling and provide curricular the GOCard for identification purposes. advice at various events throughout the The GOCard is used to gain access to Law Spring registration period. Course descrip- Center buildings and Library services and tions, course schedules and curriculum essays has a debit account feature, which can be are available in the Law Center’s searchable used around campus. Funds can be deposited online Curriculum Guide at www.law. onto the card at the Law Center GOCard georgetown.edu/curriculum/. Continuing Satellite Office (McDonough 101), at various students register online, using MyAccess. VTS machines around campus or at the Students may adjust their course schedules Online Card Office located at: http://gocard. during the periods announced in the registra- georgetown.edu. Items or services that can be tion materials distributed to students early purchased with the GOCard include parking in April. The registration deadlines are also tickets, laundry in the Gewirz Center, published in these materials. vending items and copying. The GOCard can First-year students register during their also be used in the Law Center’s food service August orientation. If students register after facilities, as well as several local off-campus the published deadlines for registration, establishments. they incur a late registration fee of $80.00. Please retain your GOCard throughout A student’s registration is not processed your years at Georgetown. If your GOCard until all outstanding tuition and fees have is lost or stolen, it should be deactivated been paid in full. Tuition is charged for all as soon as possible. You can deactivate courses in which a student has enrolled until your GOCard online 24 hours a day at the the Office of the Registrar receives a written GOCard web site (http://gocard.georgetown. notice of withdrawal. See Withdrawal edu) or you may report the lost or stolen Refunds in the Tuition and Fees section of card to the GOCard Satellite Office. In order this Bulletin. to receive your replacement card, you will need to go to the GOCard Office to get your replacement ID. A replacement card will be issued for a $25 fee.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 88 General Administrative Policies

STUDENT RECORDS, ACADEMIC without consent. One exception, which In compliance with federal law, the Law permits disclosure without consent, Center has implemented policies and proce- is disclosure to school officials with dures designed to preserve the confidentiality legitimate educational interests. A school of a student’s academic records. Unless official can be a person in an administra- required by law to do so, the Law Center tive, supervisory, academic or research, will not release a student’s record except or support staff position (including law with the student’s written permission. enforcement unit personnel and health staff); a person or company with whom STUDENT RECORDS, ACCESS the Law Center has contracted (such as The Family Educational Rights and Privacy an attorney, auditor, or collection agent); Act of 1974 as amended (FERPA) affords a person serving on the Board of Direc- students certain rights with respect to their tors; or a student serving on an official education records: committee, such as the Committee on 1. A student has the right to inspect and Professional Responsibility, or assisting review his or her education records another school official in performing his within 45 days of the day the Law or her tasks. A school official has a legiti- Center receives a request for access. To mate educational interest if the official do so, a student should submit to the needs to review an education record in Registrar a written request that identifies order to fulfill his or her professional the record(s) he or she wishes to inspect. responsibility. The Registrar will make arrangements 4. A student has the right to file a for access and notify the student of the complaint with the U.S. Department of time and place where the records may be Education concerning alleged failures inspected. by the Law Center to comply with the 2. A student has the right to request the requirements of FERPA. The name and amendment of the education records address of the Office that administers that the student believes are inaccurate. FERPA are: Family Policy Compliance To do so, a student should submit to Office, U.S. Department of Education, the Registrar a written request clearly 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, identifying the part of the record he or DC 20202-5920. she wants changed, and specify why it is inaccurate. If the Law Center decides STUDENT RECORDS, not to amend the record as requested by DIRECTORY INFORMATION AND the student, the Registrar will notify the CONFIDENTIALITY student of the decision and advise the Georgetown University Law Center considers student of his or her right to a hearing the following information as “directory regarding the request for amendment. information,” that is, information that can Additional information regarding the be made available to the general public: hearing procedures will be provided to name, address, telephone number, date the student when notified of the right to and place of birth, photographs, parents’ a hearing. names, major field of study, full time or 3. A student has the right to consent to part time program, dates of attendance, disclosures of personally identifiable expected graduation date, degrees and information contained in the student’s awards received, and previous educational education records, except to the extent institutions. No other items of student that FERPA authorizes disclosure information will be released to any person

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin General Administrative Policies 89 or organizations outside of Georgetown • Transcripts ordered by mail are usually University without the written consent of provided in three business days. the student, except for certain categories of We regret that we cannot accept tele- outside persons or organizations specifically phone authorization to release a transcript, exempted by federal law. even from the student. Third party authori- Under the provisions of FERPA, students zation to release a transcript or third party have the right to instruct the University to requests for a transcript will not be honored withhold the “directory information” listed without the student’s written authoriza- above. To do so, students need to fill out a tion. These restrictions are the result of “Request to Prevent Disclosure of Directory our concern for our students’ privacy and Information” form available at the Office regulations governing the Law Center under of the Registrar within the first two weeks FERPA. Transcripts cannot be released for of the Fall semester in the first year of their any student who has an outstanding student matriculation to the Law Center. account balance. Students should consider very carefully the consequences of a decision to withhold “Directory Information,” which means that the Law Center will not release this informa- tion, unless excepted by law. The Law Center assumes no liability for honoring instructions that such information be withheld.

STUDENT WORK, CONFIDENTIALITY Students who work at the Law Center may be asked to sign a confidentiality statement as a condition of their employment.

TRANSCRIPTS The Office of the Registrar will provide tran- scripts for students upon a written request from the student and the payment of a $5.00 fee per transcript. All requests for transcripts must bear the student’s signature. Transcripts may be requested in person, by fax at (202) 662-9235, or by mail, from the Office of the Registrar, 315 McDonough Hall, 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001. There is no charge for a transcript sent directly to a state bar. Transcripts cannot be released if the student’s account is delin- quent. Transcripts will be issued according to the following schedule: • Current students who request a tran- script in person prior to 4:00 p.m. may claim their transcript after 2:00 p.m. on the next business day.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 90

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin General Administrative Policies 91

ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES TO PROTECT 93 COMMUNITY WELFARE

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY CODE 93

STUDENT CONDUCT IN THE JOB SEARCH PROCESS 100

DISCRIMINATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES 101 ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF CAREER SERVICES

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 103 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT 106 ON HARASSMENT

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT 108 ON CONSENSUAL SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SENIOR AND JUNIOR MEMBERS

OF THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY C on d uc t Policies

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY COMPUTER SYSTEMS 111 ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 91 92 Conduct Policies

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 93

he faculty expects all students to exhibit high standards of academic and professional Tresponsibility. This section of the Bulletin contains policies governing the behavior of members of the Law Center community. ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES under this disciplinary code. Jurisdiction TO PROTECT COMMUNITY is not limited to the territorial limits of the WELFARE Law Center or to conduct which affects other members of the Law Center commu- nity. Allegations of minor misconduct are Georgetown University Law Center processed under the informal provisions of is committed to promoting an environ- the Code governing administrative violations. ment that supports its educational mission Allegations of more serious misconduct, and preserves the health and safety of its involving a degree of moral offensiveness or members. Sometimes a student may engage untrustworthiness that may call into question in behavior that threatens his or her well- a student’s suitability for the practice of law, being or the welfare of the community or are processed under the more formal provi- is otherwise harmful or disruptive. Such sions of the Code governing disciplinary behavior could include but is not limited violations. The Code is administered by a to threats or attempts to harm oneself or student-faculty disciplinary committee that is others, disruptive behavior in class, or guided in its interpretation and implementa- abusive behavior directed towards students, tion by the Code’s overriding purpose of faculty, or staff. In these cases, the Law promoting among law students the highest Center reserves the right to take appropriate degree of honesty, integrity and trustworthi- administrative steps for the well-being of ness. If special circumstances so require, the the students and of the community, which Law Center may override the provisions of may include requiring a student to take an this Code. involuntary leave of absence. Part One: Substantive STUDENT DISCIPLINARY CODE Violations

* Preamble §101 STANDARD OF CONDUCT Students at the Georgetown University Law Without regard to motive, intentional Center, as present and future members of student conduct that is dishonest, evidences a self-regulated profession, are required to lack of integrity or trustworthiness, or may conduct themselves with the highest degree unfairly impinge upon the rights or privileges of honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. of members of the Law Center Community is Doubts about the propriety of particular prohibited.1 conduct should be resolved in favor of avoiding even the appearance of impropriety. §102 ADMINISTRATIVE VIOLATIONS Each matriculating student is held to have Prohibited conduct that does not evidence a notice of the high standard of conduct serious lack of honesty, integrity or trustwor- demanded by the Law Center. A student’s thiness on the part of the student engaged in failure to satisfy this standard of conduct in such conduct constitutes an administrative connection with academic or nonacademic violation, but does not constitute a disci- activities subjects the student to sanctions plinary violation. * Please note and read the “Notice to Law Center Community Regarding Certain Disciplinary Proceed- ings Involving Law Center Students as Both Accuser and Accused (April 5, 2006, as amended, August 24, 2007),” on page 97.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 94 Conduct Policies

§103 DISCIPLINARY VIOLATIONS Upon request, after the right attaches, Prohibited conduct that does evidence a counsel will be appointed for the student serious lack of honesty, integrity or trustwor- by the Committee Chair from a list of thiness on the part of the student engaged faculty prepared to be defense counsel in such conduct constitutes a disciplinary maintained by the Chair. The student violation. may also be represented by any other full time faculty member who agrees to do Part Two: Procedures so on a pro bono basis. The student also retains the right to retain outside counsel §201 GENERAL of the student’s own choice and at the a. The Professional Responsibility student’s own expense. Committee shall oversee operation of the Student Disciplinary Code. It will §202 COMPLAINTS be composed of faculty and students. Complaints regarding student conduct may The Registrar, Ethics Counsel and those be made by any member of the Law Center faculty members who are assigned as community. They should be directed to the defense counsel will be members ex Ethics Counsel and may be in writing or officio. The Committee Chair will be oral. The Ethics Counsel will decide whether responsible for creating panels from the allegations should be processed as poten- the faculty and student members of the tial administrative or disciplinary charges. In committee to hear disciplinary charges. close cases, before a final charging decision Each panel shall consist of two faculty is made, the Ethics Counsel is encouraged members and one student; panels are to consult with the Committee Chair. authorized to act by majority vote. The Ethics Counsel may not add charges b. The Ethics Counsel will be a member of unrelated to the allegations in a complaint the bar and an employee of the Univer- without the approval of the Chair. All sity, appointed by the Dean. The Ethics complaints of student misconduct shall be Counsel will investigate and resolve all investigated promptly by the Ethics Counsel. administrative charges, and prosecute all disciplinary charges. In every case, the §203 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES Ethics Counsel will act in accordance a. If a complaint alleges administrative with fairness to the accused student, the violations, the Ethics Counsel has the need for accurate and prompt resolution authority to dismiss the complaint or of complaints, and the imperative for to bring and adjudicate administrative high standards of honesty by Law Center charges. If the Ethics Counsel elects to students. The Ethics Counsel is autho- dismiss a complaint that alleges adminis- rized to act on information received from trative violations, notice of the filing and any source, including a student seeking disposition shall be given to the student advice. The Ethics Counsel shall admin- named in the complaint. Administrative ister his or her duties with careful regard charges shall be in writing and filed for the educative value of the Code and with the Registrar who shall provide the rights of students. the student with a copy of the charges. c. All students formally charged with Before finding an administrative viola- violating the Student Disciplinary tion, the Ethics Counsel must provide Code or questioned by Ethics Counsel the student with notice of the charges in the course of an investigation of a and a fair opportunity informally to complaint, shall have a right to counsel. explain or defend his or her conduct.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 95

In the course of the investigation of the d. The Ethics Counsel and the charged alleged administrative violation, if the student may agree to a disposition of the Ethics Counsel wishes to speak to the charges. Such a disposition must be in student before deciding to proceed with writing and submitted to the Committee administrative charges, the student must Chair for approval. The Ethics Counsel be advised of the right to counsel. The shall report approved dispositions to the right to counsel otherwise attaches when responsible Associate Dean. In cases in the administrative charges are filed. which the Committee Chair rejects the b. The Ethics Counsel shall provide a disposition, the matter shall be referred written report to the Associate Dean to a hearing panel. for the J.D. or Graduate Programs, as e. If the charge or charges are referred to appropriate, explaining the disposition a hearing panel, the student may plead of each administrative complaint. Such guilty, not guilty or no contest. Regard- reports do not become part of any less of the plea entered, the panel must official student record, nor do they fall conduct a fair hearing and decide the within the scope of outside requests for charges only upon the evidence or stipu- disciplinary information about particular lated facts that are presented. However, students.2 formal rules of evidence will not apply and procedural irregularities should §204 DISCIPLINARY CHARGES be considered only when they result in a. If a complaint alleges disciplinary viola- actual prejudice.3 The hearing panel may tions, the Ethics Counsel may dismiss the acquit the student, or find the student complaint or bring disciplinary charges. guilty of a disciplinary or administrative If disciplinary charges are brought, the violation and impose an appropriate Ethics Counsel may reach an agreed sanction or sanctions. If the charges are disposition with the student, or pros- contested, the hearing panel may convict ecute the charges before a hearing panel. only upon clear and convincing evidence If, in the course of the investigation, the of a violation. The hearing panel should Ethics Counsel wishes to speak to the submit to the Committee Chair and student before deciding whether to bring responsible Associate Dean a brief charges, the student must first be advised written report explaining its disposition. of the right to counsel. Convictions and approved dispositions b. If the Ethics Counsel brings disciplinary of disciplinary charges normally become charges they shall be in writing and filed part of the student’s official record. with the Registrar who shall provide Disciplinary charges resulting in acquit- the charged student with a copy of tals should not appear in a student’s the charges. The right to counsel, if it official record. has not attached pursuant to §204(a), attaches when the charges are filed. Part Three: Appeals c. If the Ethics Counsel dismisses the complaint, the Ethics Counsel shall §301 GENERAL notify the student and submit a brief Only appeals from final dispositions are written report to the Committee Chair permitted. No appeals from agreed disposi- and responsible Associate Dean, tions approved by the Committee Chair are describing the complaint and the reason permitted. for the dismissal.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 96 Conduct Policies

§302 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS §305 ADVISORY OPINIONS Within 15 calendar days of the Ethics Coun- If the Ethics Counsel or the chairperson sel’s finding of an administrative violation, a is uncertain whether charged conduct, if student may appeal to the Committee Chair proven, constitutes a serious offense, he or by submitting a written notice of appeal to she may ask for an advisory opinion from the Registrar. The written notice of appeal the full committee. The ex parte ruling shall should conform to the requirements of §304. control the charging process and the track An appeal may be taken only on the grounds determination. that the penalty is disproportionately severe to those imposed on other students Part Four: Sanctions for similar conduct. No further review of administrative sanctions is authorized. §401 GENERAL Sanctions shall be appropriate to the nature §303 DISCIPLINARY APPEALS and severity of the violations to which they Within 15 calendar days after a hearing attach.4 When possible, sanctions should panel decides a disciplinary charge, either seek to educate the student about the nature party may appeal to the full Professional and importance of honesty and mutual Responsibility Committee by submitting a respect. Community service may constitute written notice of appeal to the Registrar. The all or part of any sanction. written notice should conform to the require- ments of §304. The only grounds for appeal §402 ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS are a serious misreading of the Student The Ethics Counsel may establish, in consul- Disciplinary Code, gross insufficiency of the tation with the Associate Deans, schedules of evidence, or a gross impropriety that tainted grade reductions and/or community service the proceedings. for administrative violations other than late submission of take-home exams. Late §304 PROCEDURE FOR FILING AN submissions of take-home exams are dealt APPEAL with outside the provisions of the Disci- The only written document that will be plinary Code and are subject to the following required for all appeals will be a written penalty scale: Take-home exams that are notice indicating the date the appeal is submitted from 6 to 15 minutes late will filed with the Registrar, the ruling being receive a one-step grade reduction (e.g., from appealed, the Disciplinary Code authority A to A-); exams submitted 16 to 30 minutes for the appeal and the entity or person to late will receive a two-step reduction (e.g., whom the appeal is taken. The Registrar from A to B+); exams submitted 31 to 45 shall notify the parties, the Committee Chair minutes late will receive a three-step reduc- and the reviewing entity of the pendency of tion (e.g., from A to B); exams submitted 46 the appeal. Administrative appeals shall be to 60 minutes late will receive a four-step presented orally. Disciplinary appeals may reduction (e.g., from A to B-); if an exam is be presented orally but written presentations submitted over 60 minutes late the student should be used by counsel to the extent will receive a D in the course if the instructor practicable or as directed by the Committee. determines that the exam is entitled to a Appeals shall be heard as promptly as passing grade. Under this scale, there is a possible consistent with protecting the rights five minute grace period, and the maximum of the charged student. reduction for any late exam that receives a passing grade will be a D. There will be no deviation from this scale except in the case of bona fide, documented medical or other

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 97 emergencies to be determined by the Dean or Notice to Law Center delegated Associate Dean. Community Regarding Certain Disciplinary Proceedings §403 DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS Involving Law Center Students Any appropriate sanction may be imposed for a disciplinary violation, including expul- as Both Accuser and Accused (APRIL 5, 2006, AS AMENDED, AUGUST sion, suspension, failing grades, and tran- 24, 2007) script notation. The “Clery Act,” 20 U.S.C. § 1092f, the Department of Education (DOE) regula- Part Five: Confidentiality and tions promulgated thereunder, 34 C.F.R. Reporting § 668.46, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et §501 CONFIDENTIALITY seq., as interpreted by DOE’s Office of Civil Confidentiality shall be maintained with Rights, require the University to implement respect to all proceedings under this Code, particular procedures in certain disciplinary except that students charged with disci- proceedings. In order to ensure compli- plinary violations have a right to a public ance with the law and fair and responsive hearing if they so desire. processes, the Law Center hereby directs the following: §502 CENTRAL REPORTING Notwithstanding the requirement of confi- 1. In all disciplinary cases involving alleged dentiality, convictions involving suspension conduct within the scope of the Clery or expulsion may, to the extent permitted Act or that implicate Title IX, in which by law, be reported to a central collec- both the accuser and accused are Law tion service such as the Law School Data Center students, the following proce- Assembly Service for use by other schools. dures shall be implemented: a. When a Law Center student presents §503 PUBLICATION allegations against another Law The disciplinary committee shall publicize, Center student to the Ethics Counsel without identifying details, the results of for investigation, the Ethics Counsel its disciplinary proceedings. In addition, may direct that both the accused each year the disciplinary committee shall and the accuser refrain from contact publish, in summary form and without with the other, either directly or identifying details, a report disclosing the indirectly, during the pendency of number of cases handled during the previous the disciplinary investigation and year, and the nature and disposition of each any proceeding initiated based upon case. Copies of annual reports issued by the the allegations. committee shall be available for inspection b. Both the accuser and the accused by students in the Office of the Registrar. shall be entitled to faculty counsel appointed by the Chair of the Profes- sional Responsibility Committee at no expense and both accuser and accused shall have the right to have their appointed faculty counsel present at the disciplinary hearing.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 98 Conduct Policies

c. The disciplinary hearing shall be To the extent that any of these provisions confidential unless the accuser and is inconsistent with provisions of the Student the accused agree that the hearing Disciplinary Code, the Code is hereby over- shall be open to the public. ridden, as authorized by the Code “if special d. The Law Center acting through circumstances so require.” These superseding the Associate Dean for Academic provisions shall take effect immediately and Administration, upon request of apply to all disciplinary proceedings pending the accuser or accused, will change at this time or arising thereafter, regardless of the student’s academic and/or when the underlying conduct occurred. This University-controlled living condi- announcement shall be distributed to the tions, if the changes are deemed to Law Center Community and included in the be reasonable. The Ethics Counsel next published Bulletin. may request such changes be made by the Associate Dean on behalf of the student, if such a request has not Appendix: Plagiarism been made by the student directly. Every law student must grasp the overriding e. Both the accuser and the accused importance of scrupulous honesty in the shall be informed of the outcome study and practice of law. In the presentation of the disciplinary proceeding, of written work, such honesty is the soul of including any sanctions imposed, to academic integrity and, for the lawyer, at the extent required by the Clery Act the heart of credible and effective assistance and/or Title IX. of counsel. The damage to reputation (and f. Ethics Counsel must notify the to a cause) which springs from deceit in accused of the existence of the the presentation of ideas will commonly complaint within 30 days of the prove both devastating and enduring. One complaint being made to Ethics becomes known as untruthful, or at least Counsel. Ethics Counsel must file untrustworthy, and in either case careless of charges or dismiss the matter within the rights of others. These are contingencies 30 days of notice to the accused of devoutly to be avoided. the complaint. The hearing panel This notion of deceit is not easily must conduct its hearing within 45 translated into an all-inclusive description days of the filing of charges and of plagiarism. The Law Center, therefore, render its report within 45 days of has not attempted a definition so meticu- the conclusion of the hearing. Any lously crafted as to be worthy of inclusion appeal must be resolved within 45 in a criminal code. But surely some central days after all briefs have been filed propositions are declarable, and understand- or after oral argument is concluded, able, and no student can fail to be aware of whichever occurs later. These time the broad thrust of the notion that the work limits are not jurisdictional and may of others must never be claimed as one’s be extended for good cause shown by the Chair of the Professional own. Responsibility Committee. Here are several of those propositions. 2. In adjudicating allegations of sexual The use of another’s work typically takes harassment, including allegations of any the form of either a direct quotation, where unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, the other author’s exact words are used, or a the standard of proof to be applied by paraphrasing, where the true author’s ideas the hearing panel under § 204(e) of the or language are recast in the words of the Code shall be a preponderance of the borrower. Both these forms require that he evidence standard. or she who thus uses the work of another

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 99 person give adequate credit to that person. Forewarned is forearmed (no citation Perhaps as important as the fact that the needed). credit is given is the manner in which it is given. Where exact words are used, they ENDNOTES must be designated as a quotation (quota- [1] The fact that conduct is negligent or tion marks or indentation) and footnoted in motivated by a benign purpose does the obligatory form, identifying source and not preclude that conduct from being precise page of location. Similar attribution intentional, as long as the student is called for in the use of charts, tables, intended the act upon which the charge diagrams, and like presentations of rather is based. Unintentional acts that never- more visual evidence, when originated by theless result in unfairness do not come someone else. Paraphrasing, too, demands within the scope of this Code but, rather, that the paraphraser candidly and fully are handled by the Dean and the Law account for the derivation of that which Center administration. Nonexhaustive the paraphraser has reworded. As a general examples of prohibited conduct include: proposition, prolonged paraphrasing is to be plagiarism (see Appendix: Plagiarism), discouraged, but when lengthy paraphrasing cheating or assisting another student to does occur the true source is not sufficiently cheat in connection with an examination cited when it is cited only at the end, and or assignment; unauthorized breach of generally. The rule should rather be that each anonymity in connection with a blind- discrete subportion of the material thus used graded examination; possession or use receive its own recognition, in quite precise of unauthorized materials in connection form, including page citation. with an examination or assignment; Of course, matters of general knowledge, failure to follow the instructions given and terms so commonly employed as to for an examination or assignment, such have entered the public domain need not as unauthorized communication with be footnoted5, just as this brief essay does other students, possession or use of not footnote the widely recognized truths unauthorized material, or failure to stop appearing in the foregoing lines. But we work at the prescribed time; receiving, strongly agree that, in any case involving the providing, requesting or offering to slightest doubt, you will be better served to provide unauthorized information grant rather than to withhold recognition concerning a deferred examination of your dependency on the work of another. or assignment; unauthorized use of Attributions that are arguably unnecessary in another student’s work; unauthorized these marginal instances will at the very least use of a student’s own work for multiple direct the reader to material which could purposes; unauthorized use, concealment be useful, and so advance the possibility for or removal of library books or other learning. University property; and neglect or abuse Finally, note that plagiarism can be said with respect to a clinic client. to have occurred without any affirmative Prohibited conduct also includes: showing that the student’s use of another’s misrepresentation in connection with work was intentional. Intent is presumed an application for admission to the Law in any disciplinary case where the source of Center or for financial aid; misrepresen- the material is both plain and unattributed. tation in connection with a Law Center It will be for the affected student to demon- course, assignment, or competition; and strate that the copying or restatement was, in misrepresentation on a transcript, or any such case, innocent. in connection with an application for

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 100 Conduct Policies

employment or bar admission. Misrep- [3] Charged students shall be accorded the resentation includes submitting a resume basic components of procedural fairness, which lists journal membership without including a copy of the complaint, specifying a date of termination, if the advance notice of the identities of student or graduate resigned or was adverse witnesses, the right to present suspended from the journal. The Code relevant evidence, the right to cross- prohibits the use, transfer, possession examine adverse witnesses, the right and/or sale of illegal drugs on campus. to forego a hearing by admitting guilt, In addition, conduct that may be inde- the right to admit guilt but nevertheless pendently illegal, for example, theft, appeal jurisdiction or sanction, the right destruction or mutilation of property, to request a particular sanction, and the assault, sexual harassment, and sexual right to place in the record the student’s assault, is also prohibited by the Code own comment on committee action. to the extent that it interferes with the rights and privileges of the members of [4] A nonexhaustive list of authorized the Law Center community or it calls sanctions, in order of increasing severity into question the student’s suitability to includes: warning; reprimand; proba- the practice of law. tion, with or without conditions such The Code also prohibits unauthor- as counseling; additional work such as ized refusal to cooperate with the disci- writing extra papers, or accumulating plinary committee; failure to maintain extra credits in order to graduate; grade required confidentiality in connection or credit reduction; imposition of a with administrative or disciplinary failing grade; suspension with or without proceedings; failure to comply with an automatic reinstatement; expulsion; and administrative or disciplinary sanction; withdrawal of a degree. Administrative and attempting or conspiring to commit and disciplinary officials are encouraged an act prohibited by the Code. The to formulate additional sanctions appro- examples are provided by way of illus- priate to particular violations. When tration only. Whether or not particular authorized, a transcript notation may conduct is prohibited is determined by be required to satisfy the Law Center’s the standard of conduct imposed under obligation of candor to those outside the §101, not by whether it falls within the Law Center community. Accordingly, a scope of the foregoing nonexhaustive transcript notation can accompany both examples. mild and severe sanctions, or it can be imposed as a sanction in and of itself. [2] The Law Center does not have complete control over what information will be [5] See Comment, Plagiarism in Legal called for by bar admission’s character Scholarship, 15 Toledo L. Rev. 233, 235 committees and others outside the insti- n. 12 (1983). tution. The Law Center will, however, consistent with its obligation for candor, STUDENT CONDUCT IN THE JOB seek to prevent administrative violations SEARCH PROCESS from becoming a permanent stain on a Students are expected to exhibit high student’s record. standards of professional responsibility in all of their job-seeking activities. Students are cautioned to avoid even the appearance of impropriety in the preparation of their

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 101 job resumes, letters and application forms. subject of discrimination by a prospective Misleading, inaccurate, or false informa- employer recruiting students to fill part time, tion on these materials are a violation of temporary and full time positions. the Student Disciplinary Code. Students are Students who have a question about expected to attend all scheduled interviews, whether a particular action or statement unless cancelled in a timely and appropriate might constitute improper conduct should manner. Students should view the acceptance speak with a counselor in the Office of of an offer, whether for a paid or unpaid Career Services or the Office of Public position, as a binding commitment. Failure Interest and Community Service. to honor commitments may have implica- tions for the student’s reputation and that of Requirements for Filing the Law Center. If unusual or extenuating Grievances circumstances arise following an acceptance Any degree candidate, enrolled as a student of an offer, students should consult with at the Law Center when the alleged discrimi- a career advisor at the Law Center before natory act occurred, has the right to file a taking actions that may violate this policy. discrimination complaint with the Office of Career Services. DISCRIMINATION GRIEVANCE Complainants must file a grievance PROCEDURES ADMINISTERED within 30 days of the alleged discriminatory BY THE OFFICE OF CAREER act. Earlier filing is encouraged, including a SERVICES confidential statement of probable intention to file based upon specific allegations of Policy Statement misconduct. Later filing may be permitted for The policy of Georgetown University Law good cause shown. Center is to provide equal opportunity in its A grievance must be filed with the programs, activities, and employment prac- Assistant Dean, Office of Career Services. tices; to prohibit discrimination and harass- The grievance may be filed using the griev- ment in education and employment because ance form available in the Office of Career of race, color, religion, national origin, Services and the Office of Public Interest and sex, age, handicap or disability, or sexual Community Service, but any written submis- orientation, personal appearance, family sion containing the information requested responsibility, gender identity or expression, by that form will be satisfactory. In addition genetic information, marital status, political to briefly describing the event in question, affiliation, veteran’s status or any other the complaint should set forth as precisely as factor prohibited by law; and to promote possible any allegedly offensive language that the realization of equality of opportunity in was part thereof. education and employment throughout the Law Center in accordance with the policy Procedures for Processing expressed in the University-wide Affirmative Grievances Action Plan. Upon receipt of the complaint the Assistant This internal grievance procedure has Dean shall first determine whether the been established to provide a mechanism complaint states a violation of the Law for any Law Center degree candidate who Center non-discrimination policy set forth believes that under the standards stated above. If the Assistant Dean finds that no in the above policy he or she has been the violation has been stated, the student shall

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 102 Conduct Policies be promptly informed and may appeal the of the Faculty-Student Placement Committee. decision to the Dean, who may confirm the Refusals of an individual or organizational decision or forward the matter for handling respondent to issue an apology or take some under the next process described. If the other conciliatory step as may be called for complaint states a violation, the Assistant by the Assistant Dean shall be referred to the Dean shall immediately apprise the indi- Faculty-Student Placement Committee for a vidual respondent(s) and the organization’s determination of appropriate further sanc- ultimate hiring authority of the charge and tions to be recommended to the Dean. request a written response to the allegations. The Assistant Dean shall seek to resolve Appeal to the Dean the complaint within 21 working days from The complainant or the respondent shall the notification of the respondent. This office have the right to file a written appeal of the may conduct interviews with all relevant Assistant Dean’s decision to the Dean of persons and seek information in any other the Law Center within ten days of receiving relevant form. The Assistant Dean may the Assistant Dean’s decision. The notice delegate the interviewing and information of appeal shall indicate the reasons for the seeking functions to the Law Center’s Legal party’s appeal. The Dean may with written Ethics Counsel. explanation affirm, or remand the matter for If a mutually acceptable resolution further consideration by the Assistant Dean. is achieved through the Assistant Dean’s efforts, the case shall be closed. A written Record notice shall list findings and indicate the The Assistant Dean, Office of Career agreement reached. The agreement shall Services, shall submit to the Chair of the be retained in the files of the Office of Placement Committee a bimonthly summary Career Services and copies provided to the of all grievances filed during that period, and complainant, the respondent and his/her of further action taken with regard to all ultimate hiring authority. such cases previously pending. Confidenti- If no mutually acceptable resolution ality with regard to these summaries shall be can be achieved, the Assistant Dean shall maintained so far as is possible. make, and provide the parties with, a written Nothing contained herein shall be finding on the merits of the complaints. considered as limiting a complainant’s Upon a finding adverse to the respon- right to pursue any other remedy provided dent, sanctions may be imposed depending by federal or local law, or as requiring the on the severity of the offense, including University to pursue any process other than but not limited to requesting a written those described by this code. apology or other conciliatory steps, issuing a reprimand to the individual and/or the organization, placing the individual and/or the organization on probation, or denying the individual or organization recruiting access to Law Center facilities and services for a specified time. The sanctions of proba- tion or denial of individual or organization recruiting access may only be imposed by the Law Center Dean upon the recommendation

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 103

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY tunity Commission, the Office of Civil Rights AFFIRMATIVE ACTION of the Department of Education and the GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES TO United States Department of Labor. INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF It is a violation of this policy to file a * discrimination complaint for the purpose DISCRIMINATION of injuring the reputation or causing harm to another person. Without minimizing the Introduction injury that can be suffered by the victim of Georgetown University recognizes and discrimination, the University also recognizes accepts its responsibilities to act in accor- that the filing of a discrimination complaint dance with the University’s Affirmative can have serious consequences for the person Action Plan, federal laws and regulations accused of discrimination. That person, too, and the District of Columbia Human Rights has rights that the policy on discrimina- Act. Therefore, the University has established tion must preserve and protect. A person this grievance procedure for the Office of who abuses this policy by filing a frivolous Institutional Diversity, Equity, and Affirma- complaint will himself or herself be subject tive Action (“IDEAA”) to review, investi- to discipline if IDEAA determines that the gate, and resolve alleged violations of the complaint was filed in bad faith. This provi- University’s Equal Employment/Affirmative sion is not meant in any way to discourage Action Policies and the Policy Statement on legitimate complaints. Sexual Harassment. This procedure applies The University will continue to promote to allegations of unlawful discrimination affirmative action in all areas of the Univer- and harassment on the basis of age, color, sity. Successful efforts in this area will disability, family responsibility, gender contribute to an improved environment in identity and expression, genetic information, which to work and study. The University marital status, matriculation, national origin, believes that this non-adversarial grievance personal appearance, political affiliation, procedure will benefit students, faculty, staff race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, veteran and administrators, and will make “Affirma- status and other factors prohibited by law. tive Action/Equal Employment Opportunity” This internal Affirmative Action Griev- a reality at this institution. ance Procedure provides a mechanism for aggrieved employees and students to receive Requirements for Filing a fair hearing on issues of discrimination Grievances including sexual harassment. Complainants, 1. Any applicant for employment, current respondents and witnesses who participate or former employee or student (here- in this process are bound by rules of confi- inafter referred to as Complainant), of dentiality. Complainants are required to Georgetown University has a right to file exhaust the procedure within the University a discrimination complaint with IDEAA. with regard to any grievance before pursuing The “Discrimination Complaint Form” remedies outside the University with any may be obtained from IDEAA. external enforcement agencies including the District of Columbia Human Rights Commission, the Equal Employment Oppor-

* Important Note: As of the date of this document, Georgetown University Affirmative Action Griev- ance Procedures to Investigate Allegations of Discrimination are undergoing review and possible revision. Students are responsible for consulting the Office of Institutional Diversity, Equity & Affirmative Action webpage to learn of any changes: http://ideaa.georgetown.edu/.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 104 Conduct Policies

2. Complainants must file a grievance in Procedures for Processing writing within 120 days following the Grievances alleged discriminatory act or the date on which the Complainant knew or reason- STEP I. INFORMAL CONCILIATION ably should have known the act. 1. IDEAA shall receive the complaint, assist 3. A grievance must be filed with IDEAA at the complainant in defining the charge M36 Darnall Hall. and completing the grievance form. 2. IDEAA shall apprise the respondent and Further Provisions on Time in the case of University employees, his/ Limits her administrative officer of the charge All of the time limits contained within this and its supporting documents, assist grievance procedure may be extended. him/her in interpreting the charge, and suggest a format for responding to Principle of Non-Retaliation the charge. The Complainant is also The University strongly encourages any provided a copy of the Respondent’s victims of prohibited discrimination to statement and is given the opportunity to report the incident and seek redress, if he or respond to this statement. she is unable to resolve it satisfactorily and 3. IDEAA shall have thirty (30) working completely through informal means. days to resolve the complaint informally The University recognizes the unusual and shall have the right to all necessary burden that the alleged discriminatory or information to do so and to interview harassing conduct places on the recipient witnesses including the right to bring and acknowledges the necessity for a together complainant and respondent, prompt, thorough and careful resolution of if desirable. If a mutually acceptable all reported cases. It is illegal and contrary resolution is achieved through the efforts to University policy for any individual to of IDEAA, the case shall be closed. A engage, whether directly or indirectly, in written notice may list findings and retaliatory conduct against a person who indicate the agreement reached, and shall files a discrimination complaint or gives be signed and dated by the complainant, testimony during an investigation of such a the respondent, and a staff member of complaint. IDEAA. Copies will be provided to both As used in the above paragraph, “retalia- the complainant and respondent. If the tory conduct” means conduct that materially, evidence supports a finding that there is adversely and unjustifiably affects another’s no basis of illegal discrimination, IDEAA terms or conditions of employment or educa- shall indicate this conclusion to the tional experience, or quality of life, and that complainant, advising him/her that the is motivated by intent to cause harm because case is closed. of the targeted individual’s involvement in If conciliation is not possible, the filing or investigation of a discrimina- IDEAA shall so notify both complainant tion complaint. Any student or employee and respondent in writing, and shall who believes that retaliatory actions have advise complainant of his/her right to been taken against him or her for having proceed to the formal step of a Univer- filed a complaint or provided testimony in sity hearing. The complainant shall have an investigation of discrimination may seek ten (10) working days to advise IDEAA redress through IDEAA. of his/her desire to have a hearing.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 105

STEP II. FORMAL HEARING with its responsibility to investigate the 1. 1. If the complainant requests a formal complaint, issue its findings including hearing, IDEAA shall send written recommendation for corrective action notification to the appropriate Executive if warranted. A staff member of IDEAA Vice President and Chief Administra- shall be present at all deliberations of the tive Officer, the respondent and his/ Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel. her administrative officer. This notifica- 5. The Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel shall have tion shall include a copy of the charge the right to all relevant information and naming the complainant and respon- to interview witnesses, including the dent, a description of the nature of the right to bring together complainant and complaint, and other written documents respondent. pertaining to the case. 6. Within forty-five (45) working days from 2. IDEAA shall then establish a three- its formation, the Ad-Hoc Grievance member Ad-Hoc Affirmative Action Panel shall submit its findings to the Grievance Panel selected from the Equal Director of Affirmative Action Programs Opportunity Examining Board made for review. This official shall forward up of Georgetown University admin- the panel’s findings and the background istrators, faculty and staff. Grievances documentation to the appropriate involving discriminatory denials of Executive Vice President or Senior Vice tenure, promotion or reappointment of President and Chief Administrative faculty members shall be heard by panels Officer for review and comment. After composed of faculty or academic admin- this official approves the panel’s recom- istrators only. The three member Ad-Hoc mendations, IDEAA shall forward the Affirmative Action Grievance Panel shall findings to the complainant, respondent be selected in the following manner: and his/her administrative officer. 3. The complainant shall select one member 7. If the panel sustains the complainant’s of the Equal Opportunity Examining grievance IDEAA shall monitor the Board, and the respondent shall select Panel’s recommendation. The appro- another. IDEAA shall convene a meeting priate Executive Vice President or Senior of these two selected panelists who shall Vice President and Chief Administrative choose the third member to form the Officer shall ensure that the Panel’s Ad-Hoc Affirmative Action Grievance recommendations are smoothly imple- Panel. mented and that no retaliatory actions A member of IDEAA shall present are taken against the complainant or the details of the complaint to the respondent. panel members who shall be asked to disqualify themselves if they have prior Student Employment knowledge of the complaint, the circum- Grievances stances surrounding the incidents, or any Georgetown University students who are other reason which might prevent them also full time or part time employees of the from rendering an impartial decision. University, in their employee capacity, are 4. The Director of Affirmative Action subject and entitled to the preceding griev- Programs, or a designee shall present all ance procedures. If the student employee documents relevant to the complaint, initiates his/her discrimination complaint instruct them in effective investiga- with the academic Dean or Department tive processes, and ensure that they Chairperson, the Dean or Department thoroughly understand the process. Chairperson will transfer the case to IDEAA The panel shall be charged formally for resolution.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 106 Conduct Policies

Student Grievances in Academic other factor prohibited by federal and/or and Non-Employment Matters District of Columbia law. The grievance procedures in this document to This policy on Harassment will be review, investigate and resolve allegations of widely disseminated to members of the unlawful discrimination on the basis of age, University community, and will be consis- color, disability, family responsibility, gender tently enforced. The policy will be reexam- identity and expression, genetic information, ined, updated as appropriate, and distributed marital status, matriculation, national origin, regularly to all students, faculty, and staff. personal appearance, political affiliation, All employees are responsible for completing race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, veteran training provided by the University to status and other factors prohibited by law prevent harassment and promote a respectful do not apply to student complaints in strictly community. academic areas. Special procedures have been established by all of the University’s Sexual Harassment colleges and schools to resolve academic For the purposes of this policy, sexual harass- concerns. The matters should be discussed ment is defined as any unwelcome sexual first with the Dean of the school. The student advance, request for sexual favors or other may submit a formal written complaint to verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature the Dean, and a copy of this written formal when: complaint must be sent to the Director of 1. Submission to such conduct is made Affirmative Action Programs, so that IDEAA explicitly or implicitly a term or condi- may be informed of the complaint. The tion of an individual’s employment or procedures for discrimination complaints academic advancement; or are listed in the Undergraduate Bulletin and 2. Submission to or rejection of such official school publications of the University’s conduct is used as a basis for making individual colleges and schools. an employment or academic decision affecting an individual; or Peer Sexual Harassment 3. Such conduct has the purpose or effect of It is contrary to University policy for students interfering with an individual’s work or to subject their peers to sexual harassment. educational performance, or of creating Therefore students may use these grievance an intimidating, hostile, or offensive procedures to file such complaints against environment for work or learning. their peers. Sexual harassment may occur between GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY persons of the same or opposite gender. Sexual harassment subverts the Univer- POLICY STATEMENT ON sity’s mission, diminishes the dignity of both HARASSMENT perpetrator and victim, and threatens perma- nent damage to the careers, educational It is the policy of Georgetown University experience, and well-being of our students, to prohibit harassment on the basis of age, faculty and staff. color, disability, family responsibilities, Sexual harassment is especially serious gender identity and expression, genetic when it occurs between teachers and students information, marital status, national origin, or supervisors and subordinates. In such situ- personal appearance, political affiliation, ations, sexual harassment unfairly exploits pregnancy, race, religion, sex, sexual orienta- the power inherent in a faculty member’s tion, source of income, veteran’s status or or supervisor’s position. Although sexual

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 107 harassment often occurs when one person guidelines, ethnic slurs and other verbal or takes advantage of a position of authority physical conduct relating to an employee’s over another, the University recognizes that national origin, surname, skin color or sexual harassment may also occur between accent would constitute unlawful harassment people of equivalent status. This includes when such conduct: has the purpose or effect peer student sexual harassment. Regardless of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offen- of the form it may take, the University will sive working environment; has the purpose not tolerate conduct of a sexual nature that or effect of unreasonably interfering with creates an unacceptable working or educa- the employee’s work performance; or has the tional environment. purpose or effect of adversely affecting his or her employment opportunities. Harassment Other Than Sexual Harassment Procedure for Complaints Harassment, other than sexual harassment, Any member of the University community, is verbal or physical conduct that deni- who believes that conduct that violates this grates or shows hostility or aversion to an policy has occurred, or who has questions individual because of age, color, disability, concerning this policy, is encouraged to family responsibilities, gender identity and contact the Office of Institutional Diversity, expression, genetic information, marital Equity and Affirmative Action immediately. status, national origin, personal appearance, This office is staffed with trained counselors, political affiliation, pregnancy, race, religion, and administers both a confidential media- sex, sexual orientation, source of income, tion process and a confidential grievance veteran’s status or any basis prohibited by procedure. A full description of the Griev- federal and/or District of Columbia law, ance Procedures may be obtained from the when such conduct has the purpose or Office of Institutional Diversity, Equity and effect of: unreasonably interfering with an Affirmative Action. individual’s academic or work performance, In addition, the University recognizes creating an intimidating, hostile, or offen- that supervisors bear a particularly impor- sive educational or work environment; or tant responsibility to deter harassment. otherwise adversely affecting an individual’s Supervisors who learn of conduct that academic or employment opportunities. may violate this policy should immediately Harassment may include, but is not contact the Office of Institutional Diversity, limited to: verbal abuse or ridicule, including Equity and Affirmative Action, and, as slurs, epithets, and stereotyping; offensive appropriate, inform their own supervisors. jokes and comments; threatening, intimi- In accordance with the guidelines of the dating, or hostile acts, and displaying or EEOC, all complaints will be investigated distributing offensive materials, writings, impartially, and appropriate corrective graffiti, or pictures. action will be taken, including discipline for inappropriate conduct. Complaints will be National Origin and Accent handled confidentially, except as necessary Harassment for investigation and resolution. The Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) This policy prohibits retaliation, harass- has taken the position that harassment of ment, or other adverse action against an employees on the basis of their national individual for making a complaint, assisting origin or their accent or manner of speaking in an investigation, opposing harassment is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights or otherwise exercising rights protected by Act of 1964 as amended. Under EEOC law. It further prohibits taking any adverse

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 108 Conduct Policies academic or employment related action are most severe when a consensual relation- against an individual based on an unsubstan- ship takes places between a teacher (e.g. tiated allegation or rumor of harassment. professor, teaching assistant, clinical fellow) and a student and the student is enrolled GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY in one of the teacher’s courses for which POLICY STATEMENT ON the student will receive a grade, or when CONSENSUAL SEXUAL the student is likely to be enrolled in such a course in the future. These problems can RELATIONSHIPS1 BETWEEN also be very severe in a counseling setting SENIOR AND JUNIOR between counselors and counselees. Given MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY the potential for such problems, the Univer- COMMUNITY sity strongly recommends that members of the University community avoid any Introduction senior-junior consensual sexual relation- There are various approaches an institution ships. This recommendation has particular could take to address the issue of consensual force with regard to undergraduate students. sexual relationships between a “senior” and At Georgetown University, virtually all “junior” person. (See definitions below). undergraduate students are between the ages One extreme is to ban all such relationships. of eighteen and twenty-two, and many are The other is to pretend such relationships do living away from home for the first time. not exist. The University has taken a middle Because of the unique susceptibility of these ground on this policy. young men and women, teaching profes- The policy not only points out the poten- sionals are under a special obligation to tial legal and ethical pitfalls of consensual preserve the integrity of the teacher-student sex in the University setting, but also, and relationship in situations involving under- more specifically in the section called “Stan- graduate students. If members of the commu- dards and Procedures,” asserts the Univer- nity choose by mutual consent to enter into sity’s right to protect the integrity of its own such relationships, however, the University operations from the conflicts of interest and requires that they take specific steps to disruptions in the academic and employment minimize the problems that may arise from environments that can arise from consensual them. Sanctions shall be commensurate with sexual activity involving members of the the magnitude of the harm, if any, caused. University community. The Problems The Nature of the Problem There are many ways problems can arise Consensual sexual relationships between when a senior member of the Georgetown “senior” and “junior” members of the community engages in a consensual sexual Georgetown community—that is, between relationship with a junior member. First, two persons where one party (the “senior”) when one person has the ability to grade, possesses direct academic, administrative, advance, promote, recommend, or otherwise counseling, or extracurricular authority over influence the employment or academic status the other (the “junior”)—do not violate of the other, there is the possibility that what laws prohibiting sex-based discrimination.2 appears to be a consensual relationship is Nevertheless, such relationships are a matter falsely perceived to be so. Some recipients of significant concern to the University of sexual advances may fear that refusal because of the ethical and administrative will result in loss of an employment or problems they can pose. Those problems academic benefit. They may go along with

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 109 the requested relationship even though it is in There is also a serious risk that either fact unwelcome to them (and may even cause party may exploit the other. The senior them psychological harm). The United States person may be interested in the junior solely Supreme Court has ruled that such a person for purposes of sexual gratification, but the is a victim of illegal sexual harassment, and junior may construe that attention as related that a school can be liable for monetary to the junior’s intellect, as revealed through damages for a teacher’s coercive intercourse his or her studies or work. If the junior with a student.3 Apart from a policy of participates in a sexual relationship and then avoiding legal liability for such conduct, the discovers the true situation, there is a poten- University wants to ensure that it provides an tial for a damaging loss of self esteem by the environment free from sexual coercion and junior (especially where the two are teacher intimidation in which to study and work. and young student and there is a significant The person in the position of authority age disparity between them). There is also who may desire a sexual relationship with the risk of the junior exploiting the senior. a junior nevertheless has strong reasons to For example, a junior might seek out a avoid it, since what seems initially to be relationship solely because of a desire to consensual may turn out to be unwelcome obtain some academic or employment benefit or coercive from the perspective of the junior from the relationship (such as a higher grade participant. The junior participant may file or a promotion).4 an internal grievance or a formal lawsuit, creating a risk that the person in authority Standards and Procedures will suffer negative career consequences For the reasons expressed in the previous and may have to pay damages to the victim. section of this Policy, the University strongly Because of the serious consequences to the urges members of the University community senior participant, that person also subjects to refrain from engaging in consensual himself or herself to the possibility of sexual relationships with another member coercion or blackmail. of the University community when one Even when such a relationship is genu- person possesses direct authority over the inely consensual (and therefore does not other, whether that authority is used by one constitute sexual harassment or raise the who is a teacher, counselor, or supervisor of other concerns noted above), the relationship the other or by someone who can directly can cause problems for both parties and influence the academic or work status of harm the academic and work environment at the other (e.g., a senior professor serving the University. There is the appearance and as a member of the tenure committee for often the reality of a conflict of interest on a junior professor, a professor serving as the part of both parties to the relationship. the thesis advisor for a graduate student, Others may believe that the senior favors a senior student on the editorial board of the junior because of the sexual relationship, a newspaper or journal voting whether a thus creating an atmosphere of suspicion and junior student should attain the same status, resentment among other juniors who think a supervisor filling out a performance evalua- the junior in the relationship is obtaining tion for his or her subordinate). undeserved benefits. The junior person’s If the two nevertheless commence such professional reputation or academic standing a relationship, the University requires that may be injured because of the perception they take the following measures, in order to that the benefits were due to the sexual lessen or minimize the conflict of interest and relationship, rather than to the junior’s own disruption of the academic and employment work or study. environment that can arise in such situations.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 110 Conduct Policies

The University emphasizes that the following ALL OTHER SENIOR/JUNIOR measures cannot eliminate entirely the RELATIONSHIPS substantial likelihood of conflict and disrup- In any other situation where a senior has tion, and that the course of action strongly direct authority over a junior, and can thus preferred by the University would be for the advance, promote, recommend, or in any two to refrain from engaging in consensual other way directly influence the academic or sexual relations for as long as necessary to work status of the junior, the senior person prevent conflict and disruption. should recuse himself or herself from any decision involving the status of the junior.5 If RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TEACHERS the fact of refusal causes the senior to experi- AND STUDENTS ence difficulty with a superior, the senior The University has determined that there should explain the reason for the recusal to is an inherent conflict of interest when a the person in authority. The senior’s obliga- faculty member and a student simultane- tion to explain also exists where an unex- ously maintain both a direct student-teacher plained failure to participate might create relationship and a consensual sexual relationship, and therefore prohibits simul- an inference of a negative evaluation of the taneous participation in both roles. Thus, if junior by the senior. one party to a consensual sexual relationship is a student of the other person in a course Sanctions for Violations of for which the student will receive a grade, This Policy; Review; Other the student should immediately withdraw Limitations from the course and should never again 1. Any teaching professional who violates take a course with that teacher. In such the procedures in Part III of this Policy, case it is the duty of the teacher to take all or any other individual engaged in a steps, including if necessary consultation consensual sexual relationship who with the appropriate Dean, to assure that violates any of the procedures in Part III the student’s enrollment in the course is of this Policy, shall be subject to sanc- promptly terminated. If the student is not tions commensurate with the severity currently enrolled in any of the teacher’s of the offense. The sanction shall be courses when the relationship begins, the student should refrain from taking any determined in the case of a teaching future course with the teacher. The policy of professional, by the appropriate Dean or not taking courses with the teacher should Executive Vice President, after consulta- continue even after the relationship has tion with the chair, if any, of the teaching ceased. professional’s department; and in the case of other individuals covered by this COUNSELORS AND COUNSELEES section, by the appropriate director or Because of the potential for emotional harm, other supervisory official, including the individuals should not engage in both a Senior Vice President for Georgetown consensual sexual relationship and an official University. But in the case of a student counselor/counselee relationship. If a consen- violating these procedures, sanctions sual sexual relationship commences during shall be determined by the appropriate an official relationship, the official relation- Dean on that student’s campus. ship should immediately be terminated and 2. The imposition of any sanction imposed never be started again. Similarly, individuals under this Policy may be subject to in, or who have been in a consensual sexual review under any applicable provision relationship should thereafter never enter of an established University grievance into an official counseling relationship. procedure.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 111

Endnotes [5] For example, a senior faculty member [1] This policy does not apply to married who has had a relationship with a junior couples. The policy on nepotism offers faculty member should not participate in clarification on this point. This policy the deliberations of a tenure committee does not replace The Benefit of this concerning the junior, or on an academic Establishment: A Student Code of personnel committee deciding such Conduct. issues as salary increases for the junior. Similarly, a teacher should not provide [2] “Consensual” means a sexual relation- a letter of recommendation for a ship between two people who both student with whom the teacher has had genuinely desire the relationship and a relationship even if the relationship neither of whom is coerced into having began after the course was completed the relationship. The term “consensual” (and thus did not violate the University is used throughout this document to policy on teacher student relationships.) mean such a relationship. “Extracur- Another example is that a senior student ricular” refers to participation in on a student publication editorial board extracurricular student activities such should not vote on whether a junior as a student newspaper or law review. student with whom the senior has had a A “senior” student is sometimes in a relationship should be promoted to the position to influence whether a “junior” editorial board. student will gain some desired position within the organization. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY COMPUTER SYSTEMS [3] Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson 477 ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY U.S. 57 (1986); Franklin v. Gwinnett The Law Center follows Georgetown County Public Schools, 503 U.S. 60 University’s Computer Systems Acceptable (1992) (unlimited damages). Title VII of Use Policy (www.georgetown.edu/policy/ the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended technology/acceptuse.htm) and Georgetown by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, now University’s Copyright in the Information provides for monetary damages for Age Policy (www.georgetown.edu/policy/ victims of sexual harassment in federal copyright/). General information about both employment discrimination suits as is provided below. However, it is a good idea well. 42 U.S.C. § § 1981a(a), (b)(3) to check above to sites for any changes and/ (maximum damages of $300,000 for or additions. employers more than 500 employees). See also Harris v. Forklift Systems, 510 Guiding Principles U.S. 17 (1993). Our community is encouraged to make innovative and creative use of information [4] A number of problems analogous to technologies in support of education and those described in this section affect research. Access to information representing consensual sexual relationships among a multitude of views on current and histor- members of the University community ical issues promotes the interest, informa- of relatively equal status, but these rules tion and enlightenment of the Georgetown do not apply to this behavior, which may University community. Consistent with other become subject to disciplinary action for University policies, the Acceptable Use and other reasons. Copyright in the Information Age policies

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 112 Conduct Policies were written to promote and respect the 2. Users may only use their own computer rights and obligations of academic freedom. accounts. They may not supply false or The University recognizes that the purpose misleading data, or improperly obtain of copyright is to protect the rights of the another person’s account information creators of intellectual property and to to gain access to computers, network prevent the unauthorized use or sale of systems, data or information. The works available in the private sector. negligence or naiveté of another user in The University cannot protect indi- revealing an account name or password viduals against the existence or receipt of is not considered authorized use. Conve- material that may be offensive to them. nience of file or printer sharing is not As such, those who make use of electronic sufficient reason for sharing a computer communications are warned that they may account. Users should not attempt to come across or be recipients of material they subvert the restrictions associated with find offensive. Those who use email and/or their computer accounts. make information about themselves avail- 3. Users are responsible for all use of their able on the Internet should be forewarned computer account(s). They should make that the University cannot protect them appropriate use of the system and take from invasions of privacy and other possible precautions against others obtaining dangers that could result from the individu- access to their computer resources. al’s distribution of personal information. Individual password security is the The University’s computing and network responsibility of each user. resources are to be used only for University- 4. Users may not encroach on others’ use related research, instruction, learning, of computer resources. Such activities enrichment, dissemination of scholarly would include, but are not limited information, and administrative activities. to, game playing; sending harassing The computing and network facilities of the messages; sending frivolous or exces- University are limited, and should be used sive messages, including chain letters, wisely and carefully with consideration for junk mail, and other types of broadcast the needs of others. Computers and network messages; using excessive amounts systems are powerful communication of storage; intentionally introducing tools. When used appropriately, these tools computer viruses, worms, Trojan Horses, can enhance dialog and communications. or other rogue programs to George- However, when used unlawfully or inappro- town University hardware or software; priately, they can infringe on the beliefs or physically damaging systems; or running rights of others. grossly inefficient programs when efficient ones are available. Responsibilities 5. Users are responsible for following all The following examples, though not covering copyright and licensing restrictions as every situation, specify some of the respon- listed in the various University policies. sibilities that accompany computer and Georgetown University equipment and network use at Georgetown University. software may not be used to violate 1. Users may not attempt to modify or copyrights or the terms of any license destroy the University’s network facilities agreement. No one may inspect, modify, or computing systems. Users may not distribute, or copy proprietary data, tamper with any software protections or directories, programs, files, disks or restrictions placed on computer applica- other software without proper authori- tions or files. zation.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Conduct Policies 113

6. Users must remember that information of the University. Abuse of networks or distributed through the University’s computers at other sites through the use of computing and networking facilities is Georgetown University resources will be a form of publishing, and that some of treated as an abuse of computing privileges the same standards apply. For example, at the University. If necessary, restrictive anything generated at Georgetown actions can and will be taken by system or University that is available on the network administrators pending further Internet represents Georgetown Univer- disciplinary action; the loss of computing sity, not just an individual. Even with privileges may result. disclaimers, the University is represented The University recognizes that all by its students, faculty and staff: thus members of the University community are appropriate language, behavior and style bound by federal and local laws relating to is warranted. civil rights, harassment, copyright, security and other statutes relating to electronic Administration and media. It should be understood that this Implementation policy does not preclude enforcement under The University encourages all members of the laws and regulations of the United States its community to use electronic commu- of America or the District of Columbia. nications in a manner that is respectful to others. While respecting users’ confiden- tiality and privacy, the University reserves the right to examine all computer files. The University takes this step to enforce its policies regarding harassment and the safety of individuals; to prevent the posting of proprietary software or electronic copies of electronic texts or images in disregard of copyright restrictions or contractual obligations; to safeguard the integrity of computers, networks, and data either at the University or elsewhere; and to protect the University against seriously damaging consequences. The University may restrict the use of its computers and network systems when faced with evidence of a violation of University policies, federal or local laws. The University reserves the right to limit access to its network through University-owned or other computers, and to remove or limit access to material posted on University- owned computers. All users are expected to conduct them- selves in a manner that is consistent with these responsibilities and policies. Abuse of computing privileges will subject the user to disciplinary action, as established by the applicable operating policies and procedures

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 114

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Tuition & Fees 115

JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 117

JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 117

GRADUATE PROGRAMs 118

OTHER FEES 118

TUITION AND FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS 118

TUITION DEFERMENTS 119

PAYMENT PLANS 119

TUITION REFUND SCHEDULE — 120 WITHDRAWAL ADJUSTMENTS

TUITION REFUND SCHEDULE 120

TUITION INSURANCE — A.W.G. DEWAR, INC. 120 Tui t ion & f ees

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 115 116 Tuition & Fees

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Tuition & Fees 117

uition and fees for the 2009-2010 academic year are as follows. Please check the Financial TAffairs Web site for updates (www.law.georgetown.edu/finaff/studaccts/). JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS

FULL-TIME GEORGETOWN LAW J.D./M.B.A.; J.D./M.S.F.S.; J.D./M.A.A.S.; STUDENTS J.D./M.A.R.E.E.S; J.D./M.A.G.E.S.; J.D./ $43,750.00 (per academic year) M.A.L.A.S.; J.D./M.A.S.S.P.; J.D./M.P.P. Students pay Georgetown Law tuition for FULL-TIME VISITORS FROM ANOTHER their first year in the J.D. program. Students J.D. PROGRAM pay Georgetown University’s Graduate $21,875.00 (per semester) School tuition during the one year when they take courses exclusively at the Main Campus PART-TIME GEORGETOWN LAW masters degree program. J.D./M.B.A. STUDENTS students pay the full-time M.B.A. tuition $1,595.00 (per credit-hour) in their first year in the M.B.A. program. Students pay Georgetown Law tuition in PART-TIME VISITORS FROM ANOTHER the years when they take courses on both J.D. PROGRAM campuses. This is typically in the third and $1,595.00 (per credit-hour) fourth years of the joint degree programs.

Tuition Equalization Charge J.D./PH.D. IN GOVERNMENT OR Students who have been granted approval PHILOSOPHY FOR FULL-TIME STUDENTS: to transfer from the part-time J.D. program Prior to completing all J.D. courses and at to the full-time J.D. program will be least 24 credits in government or philosophy: assessed a tuition equalization charge, the Georgetown Law tuition. net result of which will be that at the end After completing all J.D. courses and at of three years, the student will have paid least 24 credits in government or philosophy: Graduate School tuition. the same total tuition as other full-time students. Part-time students who transfer to FOR PART-TIME STUDENTS: the full-time program and pay the tuition Prior to completing all J.D. courses and at equalization charge are entitled to take up least 24 credits in government or philosophy: to 7 credits in the Georgetown Law Summer charged at Georgetown Law part-time rate programs in DC or London without paying for all courses. any additional tuition. Consistent with our After completing all J.D. courses and at policies about receiving credit for courses least 24 credits in government or philosophy: taken at other schools, students may take charged Graduate School tuition. summer courses at other schools. However, students who do so are required to pay J.D./M.P.H. the full amount of the tuition equalization While at Georgetown Law: Georgetown Law charge. The tuition equalization charge for tuition (to Georgetown Law). those students approved for transfer into the While at Johns Hopkins: Johns Hopkins full-time program will be $4,985.00. The tuition (to Johns Hopkins). tuition equalization fee is assessed in two equal installments, in Summer 2009 and Note: Students enrolled in joint degree Spring 2010. programs may be charged additional fees for language labs or other courses necessary to earn their degree.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 118 Tuition & Fees

GRADUATE PROGRAM LATE REGISTRATION FEE $80.00 per semester Graduate Students (Including International Students) LATE PAYMENT FEE For purposes of tuition calculations, full-time $60.00 (plus 1.75% service charge per students are those who enroll for 8 or more month on unpaid balance) credit hours in a semester, and part-time students are those who enroll for fewer than TRANSCRIPT FEE 8 credit hours in a semester. $5.00 (per copy)

The following tuition rates apply to the VISITOR FEE 2009-2010 academic year for both degree (Georgetown Law student approved to visit and non-degree students: another school) $200.00 per semester FULL-TIME GEORGETOWN LAW GRADUATE STUDENTS LANGUAGE LAB FEE $43,750.00 (per academic year) (J.D./M.S.F.S.) varies with course

PART-TIME GEORGETOWN LAW YATES FIELD HOUSE GRADUATE STUDENTS $160.00 per semester (for LL.M. students $1,780.00 (per credit hour) enrolled in less than 8 credits each semester)

Full-time LL.M. students who pay two COURSE MATERIALS consecutive semesters of full-time tuition There is a charge for certain course materials and who must enroll in the immediately produced by Georgetown Law when such following Summer session in order to materials are used in lieu of, or in addition complete their degree within one calendar to, a regular textbook. year, may enroll only at the Georgetown Law for the necessary Summer Session courses to PRINTING complete their degree without payment of $0.10 per page. additional tuition. Tuition will be charged on a per-credit basis for any additional credits. RETURNED CHECK FEE $60.00 (plus retroactive $60.00 late fee and/ OTHER FEES or 1.75% service charge).

Fees not covered by the above tuition and fee TUITION AND FEE schedule: ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS

APPLICATION FEE Tuition and fees are subject to change $80.00 (non-refundable) without prior notice. • Students will not be permitted to attend TUITION DEFERMENT HANDLING class until they have paid all outstanding CHARGE balances on their student accounts, or $50.00 (must be submitted with deferment until they have received approval from application) plus 1.75% service charge per Georgetown Law Student Accounts month on unpaid balance Office for alternate financial arrange- ments. No deduction can be made for absence from classes.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Tuition & Fees 119

• Students with an outstanding account application prior to June 1 for the Fall balance will not be permitted to register semester and prior to November 1 for for subsequent semesters and will not the Spring semester. receive grades, transcripts, bar certifi- • Any and all charges incurred after cates, and diplomas. registration day are due and payable at • By registering, students accept the the time they are incurred. responsibility for all charges until such time as they notify the Office of the TUITION DEFERMENTS Registrar, in writing, of their withdrawal from the course or the program. See • All semester charges must be paid in full Tuition Refund Schedule, below. by the schedule payment due date. In • Full payment of tuition and fees must be the event of an unforeseeable personal made by the scheduled due dates: August emergency, an approved tuition defer- 24, 2009 for the Fall 2009 semester and ment can be obtained from Georgetown January 4, 2010 for the Spring 2010 Law Office of Student Accounts. This semester. It is the student’s responsibility deferment must be obtained no later to obtain an updated bill online through than the tuition due date. MyAccess should any change occur in • A $50.00 handling charge is applied to the student’s schedule of courses. all tuition deferments and 1.75% service • For part-time upper class students only, charge per month is assessed on any tuition for additional classes enrolled in unpaid balance. during the add/drop period must be paid • Tuition deferments are not granted auto- by the end of add/drop period. matically and should not be expected • Part-time students in their final semester more than once in an academic year. may request permission from the Regis- • Tuition is deferred for a maximum of 60 trar or an Academic Advisor to enroll days. in more credits than the student needs to graduate, up to the 11-credit per PAYMENT PLANS semester limit, at no additional charge for the extra credits. The Office of Student Accounts offers three • All accounts with an outstanding balance types of payment plans that are designed to will be assessed a late payment fee of assist students in paying their tuition and $60.00 plus a monthly 1.75% service fees. For complete details, please visit http:// charge. A block will also be placed on studentaccounts.georgetown.edu/Payment/ the account. PaymentOptions/GUMPP/Index.html. • A $80.00 late registration fee and/or a No refunds will be processed until $60.00 late payment fee will be charged full payment of the contract amount is to any student who has not completed completed. All financial aid loans must be all necessary arrangements, including applied first to your student account balance financial matters, by the date of registra- and/or payment plan account balance before tion noted on the academic calendar. a refund can be processed. These late fees cannot be waived unless the student has a pending loan or scholarship and the Student Accounts Office has documentation from the Office of Financial Aid. To avoid the late fee, students must complete their loan

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 120 Tuition & Fees

TUITION REFUND SCHEDULE — Withdrawal before then requires George- WITHDRAWAL ADJUSTMENTS town Law return loan funds to the lender even though, based on the tuition refund • Students who want to voluntarily schedule shown above, this may result in the withdraw from Georgetown Law must student owing a balance to Georgetown Law. give notice in writing to the Office of the Before officially withdrawing, consult the Registrar. Financial Aid Office for more information on • Tuition refunds will be calculated the financial implications of your decision. from the date the Office of the Regis- The Georgetown Law tuition refund policy is trar receives written notification of a subject to change at any time due to federal student’s withdrawal from a course or regulatory and/or school policy revisions or courses or from the Law Center. updates. • For purposes of refund calculation, weeks will be computed from the first Entering first-year students should day of class as shown on the Academic consult the refund schedule issued by the Calendar. Office of Admissions for withdrawal prior to first-year Registration and Orientation. TUITION REFUND SCHEDULE Entering first-year students who want to withdraw from Georgetown Law prior to FOR THE FALL OR SPRING SEMESTER the deadline set by the Office of Admission Prior to the start of classes 100% and/or prior to the first-year Registration and 1st through 2nd week 80% Orientation must give notice in writing to the 3rd through 4th week 50% Office of Admissions. 5th through 6th week 25% No reduction of tuition will be made for After 6th week 0% being absent from classes. Students who take an approved leave FOR THE SUMMER SEMESTER of absence after the beginning of a semester Prior to the start of classes 100% will receive tuition adjustments, if applicable, 1st week 80% based on the Tuition Refund Schedule. 2nd week 50% Students who are charged by the credit 3rd week 25% hour must comply with the faculty’s provi- After 3rd week 0% sions governing course withdrawals and will receive refunds, if applicable, based on the Note: Refunds for students who have Tuition Refund Schedule. federal student loans and who withdraw are governed by the refund procedures TUITION INSURANCE – A.W.G. established by the Department of Education DEWAR, INC. for return of student loan proceeds to the lender. The regulations require a student Tuition Insurance can protect you and your to “earn” federal financial aid on a daily family from tuition loss should an illness or basis as the term progresses. For example, injury cause you to withdraw from school if there were 100 days in the semester, a after the start of the class. This insurance student withdrawing on the 30th day will extends and enhances the Georgetown Law have earned 30 percent of their federal aid. published tuition refund schedule and insures As of the 60% point in a given semester, the that a covered student will receive 100% student is considered to have earned 100% of tuition monies paid if the student must of the federal loans borrowed for that term. withdraw from school for a covered injury or

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Tuition & Fees 121 illness (a maximum of 60% through the plan if the withdrawal occurs after the expira- tion of the Georgetown Law tuition refund period). The cost to cover tuition for both the Fall 2009 and Spring 2010 semesters is set forth below: (If you are interested in securing your tuition for only one semester, the rate is one half of the cost.) J.D. & LL.M. Full-Time $197.00 J.D. Part-Time $154.00 LL.M. Part-Time $80.00 Gewirz Housing $54.00 Tuition Equalization $22.00

The cost to cover tuition for Summer 2009: J.D. $29.00 LL.M. $24.00

Those who wish to participate in the plan must return the completed application form and payment to A.W.G. Dewar, Inc. on or before the first day of class as shown on the Academic Calendar. The Tuition Refund Insurance brochure and application form are available at the Office of Student Accounts, McDonough 581. For additional information, please check the Office of Student Accounts Web site at: www.law.georgetown.edu/finaff/studaccts/.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 122

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Curriculum 123

FIRST -YEAR J.D. PROGRAM OF STUDY 125

UPPERCLASS J.D. PROGRAM OF STUDY 125

GRADUATE CURRICULUM 127

FIRST-YEAR CONTINUING ORIENTATION 128

FIRST-YEAR TUTORIAL PROGRAM 128

THE WRITING CENTER 128 law curriculum law

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 123 124 Curriculum

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Curriculum 125

his section describes in detail the programs of study and resources available for both J.D. Tand graduate students at the Law Center. FIRST-YEAR J.D. PROGRAM OF Curriculum “A” Courses STUDY Civil Procedure, 4 credits During the first year, students are enrolled Constitutional Law I: The Federal System, 3 in either the “A” or the “B” curriculum. All credits students in the “A” curriculum begin their Contracts, 4 credits legal studies with nine courses, including a 3 Criminal Justice, 4 credits credit elective in the Spring semester chosen Legal Research and Writing, 4 credits from a group of courses on administrative, Property, 4 credits statutory, international or transnational legal Torts, 4 credits issues. Full-time students enrolled in the Elective, 3 credits “A” curriculum take all nine courses during Week One: Law in a Global Context, 1 credit their first year. In their first year, students in the part-time program take Civil Procedure, Curriculum “A” Electives (2009- Constitutional Law I: The Federal System, 2010): Contracts, Legal Research and Writing, (3 credits each) Property, Torts, and Week One: Law in International Criminal Law a Global Context (a one-week, intensive International Law I: Introduction to Interna- study of a complex problem of international tional Law law, taken in the first week of the Spring Lawmaking: Introduction to Legislation and semester). During their second year, part-time Statutory Interpretation students take Criminal Justice and the “first Legislative and Regulatory Processes: From year” elective course (chosen from a group Inception to Interpretation of courses in the areas of statutory/regula- The Regulatory and Administrative State tory law or international/transnational law), along with other elective courses. First-year Curriculum “B” Courses students in the full-time program register Bargain, Exchange, and Liability, 6 credits for the elective during the Fall semester. Part Democracy and Coercion, 4 credits time students register for the “first year” Government Processes, 4 credits elective during the course registration period Legal Justice Seminar, 3 credits in April of their first year. Legal Practice: Writing and Analysis, 4 The “B” curriculum, available in 2009- credits 2010 to one section of full time students, Legal Process and Society, 5 credits requires eight courses different in emphasis Property In Time, 4 credits from those in the “A” curriculum: Bargain, Week One: Law in a Global Context, 1 credit Exchange and Liability; Democracy and Coercion; Government Processes; Legal UPPERCLASS J.D. PROGRAM OF Justice Seminar; Legal Practice: Writing STUDY and Analysis; Legal Process and Society; Beyond the first year, the only required Property in Time, and Week One: Law in a upperclass courses are Professional Respon- Global Context. The “B” section emphasizes sibility and a seminar, clinic or supervised the sources of law in history, philosophy, research project that meets the upperclass political theory, and economics. It also seeks writing requirement. Many years ago, the to reflect the increasingly public nature of Law Center, like most law schools, had a contemporary law. prescribed upperclass curriculum. Faculty

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 126 Curriculum stopped dictating which courses upperclass such as Criminal Law, Environmental Law, students should take, however, when they International Law I, or Federal Courts, and themselves no longer agreed about what private law courses such as Commercial Law, should be required, given the increasing Corporate Finance, Intellectual Property, diversity of law practice and divergent views International Law II, or Family Law. Most about the benefits of various courses of faculty members would also encourage study. This movement away from required students to take at least one course a year upperclass curriculum has occurred at most (or semester) that particularly piques their law schools in the country. interest even if it is not clear how it will fit Nonetheless, most faculty and lawyers into their career plans. would probably concur that it is advisable Lawyers are called upon to use not for students to take Constitutional Law only their analytical skills and substantive II, Corporations, and Tax I. Taxation and knowledge, but also their ability to structure the corporate form are ubiquitous in our creative solutions, to work collaboratively society and therefore lawyers should have with others, to negotiate effectively, to be at least some familiarity with these areas. In persuasive orally and in writing, and to addition, these courses are prerequisites to communicate effectively with both lawyers a number of more advanced offerings in the and non-lawyers. Therefore, students should areas of business and corporate law. Consti- consider taking courses that use a variety of tutional Law is not only relevant to other pedagogical formats and enhance their skills courses, it addresses fundamental issues in a variety of areas. The courses in the Law about the nature of our government that Center’s clinical program offer not only the well-educated lawyers should understand. opportunity to “learn by doing,” but also In addition to these courses, many students the unique opportunity to engage in critical take Evidence: it is a prerequisite for many self-reflection about the lawyering process. clinical courses and in the view of many is The Law Center currently offers thirteen basic to understanding the American judicial clinical courses to J.D. students for academic processes. Additionally, many faculty recom- credit. All clinics are directed by Georgetown mend that students take introductory courses faculty members. in Administrative Law and Legislation The clinical courses available to students and Statutory Interpretation. Finally, given are the following: increased globalization, lawyers frequently • Appellate Litigation Clinic need to be able to operate effectively beyond • Center for Applied Legal Studies our national borders — communicating with • Criminal Justice Clinic people of other legal traditions and under- • D.C. Law Students in Court standing the potential complications when • Domestic Violence Clinic other legal traditions are implicated. As a • Federal Legislation Clinic result, the faculty recommends that students • Harrison Institute for Public Law, take one or more courses in international or Housing and Community Development comparative law. Clinic Beyond these courses, students should • Harrison Institute for Public Law select a balanced and well-rounded array • Policy Clinic of courses that add to their theoretical • Institute for Public Representation understanding, doctrinal breadth, and that • International Women’s Human Rights provide exposure to the range of skills Clinic that a good lawyer needs. Students should • Juvenile Justice Clinic choose a mixture of public law courses, • Street Law: Community

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Curriculum 127

• Street Law: High School sive engagement in their third year either In addition to the clinical program, George- through a capstone seminar such as the town offers an extensive array of alternative Advanced Constitutional Law Seminar or the dispute resolution, simulation, and problem- Environmental Research Workshop. based courses such as Business Planning Because Georgetown has an enormous Seminar, Negotiations, Mediation, Civil range of course offerings, selecting courses Litigation Practice, Trial Practice, and Appel- as a second and third year student can be late Practice. a daunting task. Faculty essays describing The recent addition of several experi- these areas of legal interest are located in ential learning courses to the curriculum the Online Curriculum Guide, at: www.law. presents further opportunities for gaining georgetown.edu/curriculum/. substantive knowledge and practical skills Students are encouraged to consult on a range of legal issues and in diverse legal faculty members and an academic dean settings. In the 2009-10 academic year, the for individualized advice on the selection Law Center will offer the following experien- and sequencing of courses in particular tial courses: subject areas as well as guidance on how to • Animal Protection Litigation Seminar approach course planning when a student is • Cosmetic Safety Regulation: Lawyering unsure about the specific direction of his or in the Public Interest her professional interest in law. In addition, • Death Penalty Litigation during the course registration process in the • Dietary Supplements Regulation: Spring semester, the J.D. Academic Services Lawyering in the Public Interest Office and Dean of Students Office sponsor • Human Rights Advocacy Seminar: a Faculty Panel on Course Selection that is a US Resettlement Policy and the Iraqi helpful source of information. Refugee Crisis Clinic selection also occurs in the Spring • Human Rights Fact-Finding Seminar: semester, prior to the last day of registration. Access to Essential Medicines in the Each clinic has its own method of selection. Dominican Republic Students may be chosen either by lottery or • Rule of Law Promotion & Civil Society by a competitive process. Those clinics that in China: Implications for Women & use competitive selection base their choices Girls (offered Summer 2009) on prior experience, writing samples, state- • U.S. Voting Rights: A Practical Perspec- ments of interest and other criteria. Most tive clinics also give preference to students who • Wrongful Convictions are entering their final year of law school. Students in their second year are encour- During the Spring semester informational aged to take advantage of the Law Center’s meetings are held and a clinic application Ethics and Professional Identity seminar packet, including detailed information about series. Students may enroll in their second the clinics, their selection criteria and the year for a small seminar that typically meets application process, is made available to in the home of a faculty member during students. the upcoming spring and the following fall, or for one semester only in the fall. GRADUATE CURRICULUM The seminars explore issues of professional The Law Center offers an extensive curric- identity, ethics and moral values in a small, ulum of graduate level courses related to its informal setting. numerous degree and certificate programs. Finally, many students find very Most graduate courses are open to all rewarding an experience of deep and inten- graduate students, regardless of the specific

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 128 Curriculum degree or certificate program in which they The Writing Center are enrolled. In addition, graduate students The Writing Center assists J.D. and LL.M. are permitted to enroll in most J.D. courses, students and graduate fellows on writing other than first-year courses and clinical projects. All Law Center students are eligible courses. The Office of Graduate Programs to receive individualized assistance at the provides individualized curriculum coun- Writing Center from a Senior Writing Fellow, seling as well as opportunities to consult a specially trained upper-level student. with faculty and practitioners in students’ The work of the Writing Center reinforces fields of interest. For more details about the methods of legal analysis, research, graduate degree and certificate programs, and writing taught in the first year. Senior see the Graduate Programs section of this Writing Fellows at the Center provide Bulletin. feedback on choosing a topic; researching scholarly papers; defining scope; organizing, ACADEMIC RESOURCE writing and revising papers; and improving PROGRAMS clarity and coherence. Students may request a conference by First Year Continuing signing up at the Writing Center at a podium Orientation outside McDonough 540. Papers, along with The J.D. Academic Services Office and the a questionnaire available from the Center, Office of the Dean of Students sponsor a must be submitted at least 24 hours before continuing orientation program for first-year the conference. The student should submit J.D. students called “Maximizing Learning his paper electronically to the Senior Writing in Law School,” which provides helpful Fellow. The Writing Center is open during information and discussion with faculty and the academic year but closes during the exam upperclass students on issues such as accli- periods and during the summer. For more mating to first year law studies, class partici- information, contact the Legal Research pation, outlining, and exam taking. In the and Writing office, McDonough 540, or call Spring semester, the series includes programs (202) 662-9525. to assist students in curriculum planning and course registration. For times and dates, check “What’s Happening!,” or the Student Services page on the Law Center’s website, at: www.law.georgetown.edu/students.html.

First Year Tutorial Program The tutorial program primarily provides academic support to first-year students. Each of the first-year sections is assigned an upperclass tutor who meets with students, in a small group, on a weekly basis. The topics covered include: case analysis, case briefing, course outlining, substantive review sessions and exam preparation, as well as general advice on the law school experi- ence. Students are admitted to the program on a voluntary basis. Individual tutors are also available for first-year and upperclass courses.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendices 129

APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE 131 OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 143

APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAMs 159 ADJUNCT FACULTY

APPENDIX D: CHARLES FAHY DISTINGUISHED 171 ADJUNCT PROFESSOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 173

APPENDIX F: LOANS 185

APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS 187 App en d ices

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 129 130 Appendi- ces

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 131

APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION Board of Directors President of the University John J. DeGioia, B.A., Ph.D. CHAIR Paul Tagliabue Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs VICE CHAIR T. Alexander Aleinikoff, B.A., J.D. Bradley M. Schaeffer, S.J. Law Center Deans and Vice THE BOARD M. William Benedetto Presidents William R. Berkley T. Alexander Aleinikoff, B.A., J.D., Execu- Paul C. Besozzi tive Vice President, Law Center Affairs, and Ana P. Botin Dean Maurice B.W. Brenninkmeijer Arthur B. Calcagnini Mitchell C. Bailin, A.B., M.St., J.D., Dean of Peter C. Cooper Students John J. DeGioia John K. Delaney Everett Bellamy, B.S., M.S., J.D., Senior Joseph Della Rosa Assistant Dean (J.D. Program) Thomas J. DeRosa William J. Doyle Nancy Cantalupo, B.S.F.S., J.D., Assistant Thomas J. Edelman Dean (Clinical Programs) John J. Fauth IV Richard H. Frank Lawrence J. Center, B.A., J.D., Assis- Thomas J. Healey tant Dean (Academic Conferences and Catherine R. Kinney Continuing Legal Education) Nemir A. Kirdar Theodore J. Leonsis Kevin T. Conry, B.S.F.S., J.D., Vice President Philip A. Marineau (Strategic Development and External Affairs) Frank McCourt, Jr. Brian O. McDermott, S.J. Andrew P. Cornblatt, B.A., J.D., Associate Peter C. Morse Vice President (Graduate Admissions & Robert L. Niehoff, S.J. Enrollment) and Dean of Admissions Timothy J. O’Neill Hutham S. Olayan Linda Davidson, B.S., Associate Vice Presi- Claire Perry dent and Chief Financial Officer David K. Reyes Thomas Reynolds, III Deborah Epstein, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean Kara Ross (Clinical Education and Public Interest & Jeanne W. Ruesch Community Service Programs) Kenneth A. Samet Robert H. Steers Gihan Fernando, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean Victor R. Wright (Career Services)

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 132 Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction

R. Scott Foster, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Assistant Admissions Office Dean and Administrative Director (Center for Transnational Legal Studies) Sophia Sim, B.A., J.D., Director of Admis- sions Vicki C. Jackson, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean (Transnational Legal Studies) Caryn Voland, B.A., J.D., Senior Associate Director of Admissions Sally McCarthy, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean (J.D. Academic Services) Alison Spada, B.A., J.D., Associate Director of Admissions Pablo Molina, B.A., M.B.A., Associate Vice President (Information Services for Emerging Alumni, Development and Technologies) and Chief Information Officer Public Relations

Barbara Moulton, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean Mary Matheron, B.S., Executive Director of (Public Interest and Community Service) Development

Carol Q. O’Neil, B.A., M.A.T., J.D., Asso- Anne Cassidy, B.A., M.A.T., M.S.J., Editor, ciate Dean (Academic Administration) Law Magazine

Wendy Collins Perdue, B.A., J.D., Associate Elissa Free, B.A., Executive Director of Dean (Graduate Programs) Communications

Charles Pruett, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean Anne Ferola, B.A., Director of The Law (Financial Aid) Annual Fund

Therese Lee Stratton, B.S., M.S., Assistant Margaret Garigan, A.B., M.S., Director, Dean (Faculty Support and Campus Services) Corporate & Foundation Relations

Robin L. West, B.A., J.D., J.S.M., Associate Christine Sturges, B.A., Director of Donor Dean (Research and Academic Programs) Relations

Administrative and Support Kara Tershel, B.A., Director of Media Rela- Services tions

Katherine M. McCarthy, B.A., M.A., Assis- Business and Financial Affairs tant to the Dean (Law Center Board Rela- tions) Abigail M L Cruce, B.A., Director of Finan- cial Planning & Reporting Alma Robinson, Executive Assistant to the Dean Christina Farias, Director of Business Services Melvinia Towns, B.S., Payroll Manager Sharon R. Sullivan, B.A., Director of Special Events

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 133

Career Services OFFICE OF RESIDENCE LIFE AND STUDENT PROGRAMS Marilyn Tucker, B.A., M.A., Director, Alumni Careers & Int’l Internships Carol Walsh, B.A., M.A., Ed.D., Director

Amy Jones-Mattock, B.A., J.D., Director, Chris Hall, B.A., M.A., Associate Director Programming Karen Pierce, B.S., M.S., Director of Janice Manganello, B.A., J.D., Associate Wellness Promotion and Club Athletics Director, Small Firm Initiative OFFICE OF STUDENT LIFE Tara Sarathy, B.A., J.D., Associate Director, Clerkships Dana Onorato, B.S., M.A., Director

Laura R. Hosid, B.A., J.D., Assistant Department of Academic Director, Evening Section Conferences and Continuing Legal Education Kimberly Neilio, B.A., J.D., Assistant Director, Diversity Outreach Jill C. Castleman, B.S., Director

Chaplains and Counselors Ethics Counsel

Ridgeway Addison, B.A., M.Div., Ph.D., Michael S. Frisch, B.A., J.D., Ethics Counsel Protestant Chaplain Financial Aid Michael Goldman, B.A., J.D., Jewish Chaplain Denae Newman, B.A., M.A., Director

Imam Yahya Hendi, Muslim Chaplain LaToya Parnell, B.S., Assistant Director

Rev. Alexei Michalenko, B.A., M.A., Brad Russo, J.D., Assistant Director S.E.O.L., M.S., Roman Catholic Chaplain Office of Graduate Programs Dorinda Young, S.S.J., B.S., M.A., Roman Catholic Chaplain Sandra P. Buteau, Licenciada en Derecho y Ciencias Politicas, LL.M., Director, Graduate Office of the Dean of Students Career Services & Professional Development

OFFICE OF DISABILITY SERVICES Ingrid Epperly, B.A., M.A., Director, LL.M. Academic Services Marianne Huger, B.A., M.A., Ed.D., Asso- ciate Director of Disability Services Mary Jean Hall, B.S., Assistant Director, LL.M. Academic Services

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 134 Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction

Jessica Hernandez, B.A., J.D., Associate Susan Mesick, B.A., Assistant Registrar Director, Graduate Career Services & Profes- (Technology) sional Development Elizabeth Robelen, B.S.F.S., Assistant Regis- Kristen Uhl Hulse, B.S., J.D., Assistant trar (Operations) Director, Graduate Career Services & Profes- sional Development Transnational Programs

Mary Bilodeau Jackson, B.A., Director, Adam Kolker, B.A., J.D., Executive Director External Relations/Business Manager Cara E. Morris, B.A., M.A., Deputy Director Albert G. Lauber, Jr., B.A., M.A., J.D., Director, Graduate Tax & Securities The Law Library Programs Janice Snyder Anderson, B.A., M.L.S., Dorothy M. Mayer, B.A., M.A., J.D., Associate Librarian, Collection Services Director of International Student Services Laura Bédard, B.A., M.L.S., M.A., Special Lindsay Wiley, A.B., J.D., Project Director, Collections Librarian Global Health Law LL.M. Program Sara E. Burriesci, B.A., J.D., M.L.I.S., Refer- J.D. Academic Services ence Librarian

Sarah J. Loope Hulsey, B.A., J.D., Director Linda Davis, B.A., M.L.S., Acquisitions Librarian Dominique Brown, B.A., Assistant Director Jennifer N. Davitt, B.A., M.L.I.S., J.D., Office of Public Interest and Faculty Services Librarian Community Service Catherine M. Dunn, B.A., M.S.L.I.S., J.D., Lauren Dubin, B.A., M.A., Director, Public Reference Librarian Interest & Government Careers Margaret A. Fry, B.A., M.L.S., Associate Holly Eaton, B.A., J.D., Director, Pro Bono Librarian, Administration, and Interim Programs Director of Law Library

Nicole Vikan, B.A., J.D., Assistant Director, Kumar Percy Jayasuriya, B.S., M.L.S., J.D., Public Interest & Government Careers Associate Librarian for Patron Services

Office of the Registrar Craig Lelansky, B.A., M.L.S., Serials Librarian Denise A. Sangster, B.S., Registrar Yan (Clara) Liao, B.A., M.L.S., Head of Deborah Naylor, B.A., Associate Registrar Cataloging and Metadata Services

Simone Woung, B.A., J.D., Associate Regis- Anne Mar, B.A., M.L.I.S., NEJL Project trar (Academic Affairs) Archivist

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 135

Barbara Monroe, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Collec- Clinics tion Development Librarian Nancy Cantalupo, B.S.F.S., J.D., Assistant Thanh H. Nguyen, B.A., M.S.L.I.S., J.D., Dean (Clinical Programs); Adjunct Professor Faculty Services Librarian APPELLATE LITIGATION CLINIC Smita Parkhe, B.S., M.S.L.S., Electronic Steven H. Goldblatt, B.A., J.D., Professor of Resources/Cataloging Librarian Law; Director

Marylin Johnson Raisch, B.A., M.Litt., J.D., CENTER FOR APPLIED LEGAL STUDIES M.L.S., Associate Law Librarian for Interna- David Koplow, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law; tional and Foreign Law Director

Refugio Ramirez, B.A., M.L.I.S., Resident Philip G. Schrag, A.B., LL.B., Professor of Librarian Law; Director

Sarah J. Rhodes, B.A., M.L.S., Digital Andrew I. Schoenholtz, B.A., J.D., Ph.D., Preservation Librarian Visiting Professor of Law (Fall)

Sara Sampson, B.S., M.L.I.S., J.D., Head of CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLINIC Reference John Copacino, B.A., M.A.T., J.D., LL.M., Professor of Law; Co-Director Mabel Shaw, B.A., M.L.S., Assistant Interna- tional and Foreign Law Librarian Abbe Smith, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law; Co-Director Roger V. Skalbeck, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Asso- ciate Law Librarian for Electronic Resources Todd Edelman, B.A., J.D., Visiting Associate Professor of Law Rachael A. Smith, B.A., M.L.I.S., J.D., International and Foreign Law Reference Laura Rose, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Visiting Librarian Associate Professor of Law

Morgan Stoddard, B.A., M.S.L.S., J.D., DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CLINIC Reference Librarian Deborah Epstein, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean (Clinical Education and Public Interest & Leslie A. Street, B.A., M.L.I.S., J.D., Refer- Community Service Programs); Professor of ence Librarian Law; Co-Director

Todd M. Venie, B.A., M.S.L.S., J.D., Refer- Laurie Kohn, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Visiting ence Librarian Associate Professor of Law; Co-Director

Jane F. Walsh, B.A., M.A., Library Systems FEDERAL LEGISLATION AND Manager ADMINISTRATIVE CLINIC Chai Feldblum, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law; Director

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 136 Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction

HARRISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC LAW INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S HUMAN Robert K. Stumberg, B.A., J.D., LL.M., RIGHTS CLINIC Professor of Law; Director Susan Deller Ross, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law; Director Matthew Porterfield, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor and Senior Fellow JUVENILE JUSTICE CLINIC Wallace J. Mlyniec, B.S., J.D., Lupo-Ricci Jacqueline Belk Scott, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor of Clinical Legal Studies; Director Professor and Senior Fellow Kristin Henning, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Associate Sara Hoverter, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Adjunct Professor of Law; Deputy Director Professor and Staff Attorney Margaret Kreitzer, B.A., M.S.W., Adjunct Jason Newman, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Professor LAW STUDENTS IN COURT CLINIC Travis Seegmiller, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Mary C. Brittingham, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Professor

William Waren, A.B., M.A.P.A., J.D., LL.M., Joanna C. Day, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Adjunct Professor Dorene Haney, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor HARRISON INSTITUTE FOR HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT James S. Manlowe, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Michael Diamond, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Professor Professor of Law; Director Nathan A. Neal, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Julie Lawton, B.S., J.D., LL.M., Adjunct Professor Professor and Staff Attorney D.C. STREET LAW PROJECT Jennie O’Flanagan, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Adjunct Professor and Staff Attorney Richard L. Roe, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law; Director INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Charisma X. Howell, B.A., J.D., Visiting Hope Babcock, B.A., LL.B., Professor of Associate Professor of Law Law; Co-Director Institutes and Other Scholarly Angela Campbell, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Programs Professor of Law; Co-Director CENTER FOR LAW AND THE PUBLIC’S Brian Wolfman, B.A., J.D., Visiting Associate HEALTH Professor of Law Lawrence O. Gostin, B.A., J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), Linda D. & Timothy J. O’Neill Professor of Global Health Law; Faculty Director

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 137

CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF James V. Feinerman, B.A., M.A., M.Phil., THE RULE OF LAW IN THE AMERICAS J.D., Ph.D., James M. Morita Professor of Joseph A. Page, B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Asian Legal Studies; Co-Director Professor of Law; Director Susan R. Weld, B.A., J.D., Ph.D., Executive CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE LEGAL Director PROFESSION Jeffrey D. Bauman, B.A., M.A., LL.B., HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTE Professor of Law; Co-Director Rachel Taylor, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor; Interim Director Milton C. Regan, Jr., B.A., M.A., J.D., Professor of Law; Co-Director INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION Carole Silver, B.A., J.D., Visiting Professor of In affiliation with the Georgetown School of Law; Executive Director Foreign Service T. Alexander Aleinikoff, B.A., J.D., Dean of CENTER ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND the Law Center THE LAW David J. Luban, B.A., M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., Susan Martin, B.A., M.A., Ph.D., Executive University Professor; Interim Faculty Director Director Andrew I. Shoenholtz, B.A., J.D., Ph.D., Nadia Asancheyev, B.A., J.D., Deputy Visiting Professor of Law; Deputy Director Director; Adjunct Professor INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL CENTER ON POVERTY, INEQUALITY, ECONOMIC LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY John H. Jackson, A.B., J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), In affiliation with the Georgetown Public University Professor; Director Policy Institute Peter B. Edelman, A.B., LL.B., Professor of Jane Bradley, B.A., M.A., Deputy Director Law, Faculty Director; Law Center O’NEILL INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL AND Harry J. Holzer, A.B., Ph.D., Professor of GLOBAL HEALTH LAW Public Policy, Faculty Director, GPPI Lawrence O. Gostin, B.A., J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), Linda D. & Timothy J. O’Neill Mark H. Greenberg, A.B., J.D., Executive Professor of Global Health Law; Faculty Director Director (Spring)

GEORGETOWN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nan Hunter, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law; AND POLICY Program Faculty Director (Fall) J. Peter Byrne, B.A., M.A., J.D., Professor of Law; Faculty Director PROGRAM ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC LAW GEORGETOWN LAW - ASIA Barry E. Carter, B.A., M.P.A., J.D., Professor Viet D. Dinh, A.B., J.D., Professor of Law; of Law; Director Co-Director

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 138 Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction

PUBLIC INTEREST LAW SCHOLARS Professors Emeriti PROGRAM Shawn Armbrust, B.S., J.D., Director Chester James Antieau, B.S., M.S., Detroit Institute of Technology; J.D., Detroit; LL.M., SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR PROJECT ON S.J.D., University of Michigan THE STATE OF THE JUDICIARY Meryl Chertoff, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Norman Birnbaum, B.A., Williams; M.A., of Law; Director Ph.D., Harvard

STATE-FEDERAL CLIMATE RESOURCE Edwin J. Bradley, A.B., Mount St. Mary’s; CENTER LL.B., Georgetown J. Peter Byrne, B.A., M.A., J.D., Professor of Law; Faculty Director John G. Murphy Jr., A.B., Harvard; LL.B., Georgetown Victoria A. Arroyo, B.S., M.P.A., J.D., Executive Director Douglas L. Parker, B.A., Stanford; J.D., Harvard SUPREME COURT INSTITUTE Steve Goldblatt, B.A., J.D., Professor of Martin Riger, B.A., LL.B., Columbia Law; Director

John R. Schmertz, Jr., A.B., Holy Cross; Richard Lazarus, B.S., B.A., J.D., Professor LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown of Law; Director

Robert S. Schoshinski, B.S., Notre Dame; Pamela Harris, B.A., J.D., Visiting Professor LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown of Law; Executive Director

WOMEN’S LAW and PUBLIC POLICY Roy A. Schotland, A.B., Columbia, LL.B., FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM Harvard Julia Ernst, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor; Executive Director Warren F. Schwartz, A.B., Brooklyn; LL.B., Columbia Wendy Williams, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law Mark V. Tushnet, B.A., Harvard; M.A., J.D., Yale WORKPLACE FLEXIBILITY 2010 Katie Corrigan, B.A., J.D., Co-Director Don Wallace, Jr., B.A., Yale; LL.B., Harvard

Chai R. Feldblum, B.A., J.D., Professor of Peter P. Weidenbruch Jr., B.S., Northwestern; Law; Co-Director J.D., LL.M., LL.D. (Hon.), Georgetown

Deans Emeriti Wendy Webster Williams, A.B., J.D., Univer- sity of California, Berkeley David J. McCarthy, Jr., A.B., Fairfield; J.D., LL.M., LL.D., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 139

The Executive Officers of the Board of Visitors University CHAIR President, John J. DeGioia, Ph.D. Robert F. Ruyak, L’74 Howrey, LLP Provost, James J. O’Donnell, Ph.D. Washington, DC

Executive Vice President for Law Center VICE CHAIRS Affairs and Dean of the School of Law, J. Clifford Hudson, L’80 T. Alexander Aleinikoff, J.D. Sonic Oklahoma City, OK Executive Vice President, Executive Dean of the School of Medicine, Howard J. Federoff, The Honorable Margaret McKeown, L’75 M.D., Ph.D. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Senior Vice President and Chief Administra- San Diego, CA tive Officer, Spiros Dimolitsas, Ph.D. THE BOARD Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Kim J. Askew, L’83 Officer, and Treasurer, Christopher Augostini K&L Gates, LLP Dallas, TX Senior Vice President for Strategic Develop- ment, Daniel R. Porterfield, Ph.D. Caryl Bernstein, L’67 The Bernstein Law Firm, PLLC Vice President for Alumni and University Washington, DC Relations, James Langley George W. Bilicic, Jr., L’88 Vice President for Mission and Ministry, Rev. Lazard Philip L. Boroughs, S.J. New York, NY

Vice President and General University Bruce Blume, L’80 Counsel, Jane E. Genster The Blume Company Seattle, WA Vice President for Institutional Diversity and Equity, Rosemary Kilkenny, J.D. Edmund W. Burke, C’70, L’73 Steptoe & Johnson, LLP Secretary of the University, Edward M. Washington, DC Quinn Theodore Burke, L’86 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, LLP London, England

Joan Claybrook, L’73 Public Citizen Washington, DC

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 140 Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction

John P. “Sean” Coffey, L’87 Keith R. Hummel, L’90 Bernstein Litowitz Berger &Grossman, LLP Cravath, Swaine & Moore New York, NY New York, NY

Edward L. Cohen, L’71 Michael D. Jones, L’85 Lerner Enterprises Kirkland & Ellis, LLP Washington, DC Washington, DC

Lloyd DeVos, L’73 The Honorable Michael Kantor, L’68 DeVos & Co., PLLC Mayer Brown LLP New York, NY Washington, DC

Paul J. Diaz, L’88 The Honorable Robert A. Katzmann Kindred Healthcare, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Louisville, KY Second Circuit New York, NY The Honorable Arthur J. Gajarsa, L’67 United States Court of Appeals for the Marianne Keler, L’76, L’80 Federal Circuit Potomac, MD Washington, DC Jules Kroll, L’66 James A. Gilbert, L’74 JEMKROLL Holdings, LLC Live Oak Equity Partners New York, NY Atlanta, GA Handel Lee, L’88 Theresa M. Gillis, L’74 King & Wood Howrey, LLP Beijing, China New York, NY April McClain-Delaney, L’89 Scott Ginsburg, L’78 CommonSense Media Dallas, TX Washington, DC

Franklin Gittes, L’73 R. Bruce McLean Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP New York, NY Washington, DC

John F. Hartigan, L’75 Alexander McMurtrie, L’61 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP Law Offices of Alexander B. McMurtrie, Jr. Los Angeles, CA Richmond, VA

N. Lynn Hiestand, F’75, L’80 Dennis Meyer, L’60, LLM’62 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Baker & McKenzie London, England Washington, DC

Judith Richards Hope Lee I. Miller, C’69, L’72 Hope & Company, P.C. DLA Piper US LLP Washington, DC Chicago, IL

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix A: Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 141

Patrick J. Moran, L’73 Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., C’64, L’67 Moran Resources Company Williams & Connolly LLP Houston, TX Washington, DC

Linda J. Morgan, L’76 Donald L. Waite, L’59 Covington & Burling LLP Saratoga, CA Washington, DC Ralph V. Whitworth, L’85 Lawrence S. Okinaga, L’72 Relational Investors, LLC Carlsmith Ball San Diego, CA Honolulu, HI

Thomas F. O’Neil III, L’82 WellCare Health Plans, Inc. Tampa, FL

Rev. Ladislas Orsy, S.J. Georgetown University Law Center Washington, DC

Carmen A. Policy, L’66 San Francisco, CA

Gregory R. Raifman, L’84 Westmont Capital, LLC Piedmont, CA

Edward M. Ricci, L’73 Edward M. Ricci, P.A. West Palm Beach, FL

Thomas A. Roberts, C’69, L’72 Weil Gotshal & Manges New York, NY

Paul Saunders, L’66 Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP New York, NY

Barry Schwartz, L’74 MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. New York, NY

Sidney J. Silver, L’62 Silver, Freedman & Taff, LLP Washington, DC

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 142

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 143

APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY Eduardo G. Abbott Nadia Asancheyev J.D., Catholic University of Valparaiso, B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Georgetown Chile; M.S., University of Wisconsin Not Teaching 2009-2010 James M. Assey, Jr. B.A., M.A., Stanford; J.D., Georgetown W. Shepherdson Abell A.B., Boston College; M.P.A., Harvard; J.D., Donald B. Ayer Georgetown A.B., Stanford; M.A., J.D., Harvard

David Albert The Honorable James Baker B.S., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., B.A., J.D., Yale American University; LL.M., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Jonathan Band B.A., Harvard; J.D., Yale The Honorable Francis M. Allegra B.A., Borromeo; J.D., Cleveland-Marshall Elizabeth Banker B.A., Northwestern; J.D., M.A., Catholic Stephen D. Altman University B.A., Duke; J.D., Syracuse Not Teaching 2009-2010

Brian C. Anderson Erik R. Barnett B.A., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., B.A., University of Arizona; J.D., California Stanford Western Not Teaching 2009-2010 Jane Barrett Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im B.A., Loyola; J.D., University of Maryland LL.B., University of Khartoum, Sudan; LL.B. Not Teaching 2009-2010 and Diploma in Criminology, University of Cambridge, England; Ph.D., University of Alfred F. Belcuore Edinburgh B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., Georgetown Christopher Anzidei B.A., Rutgers; J.D., Georgetown Everett Bellamy B.S., M.S., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Anthony Clark Arend Cleveland-Marshall B.S.F.S., Georgetown; M.A., Ph.D., Univer- Not Teaching 2009-2010 sity of Virginia Emily A. Benfer Shawn Armbrust B.A., Providence College; J.D., Indiana; B.S., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown LL.M. (expected May 2010), Georgetown

Barton Aronson Eric Berger B.A., Yale; J.D., University of Chicago B.A., Queen’s University, Canada; M.P.A., Not Teaching 2009-2010 M.T.S., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 144 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

Lori M. Berman Heather E. Bock B.A., Cornell; M.A., Ph.D., University of B.S., M.A., Ph.D., University of North Maryland Carolina

Edward A. Bernstein David Bookbinder B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Columbia A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Chicago Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010

John D. Bessler Robert C. Bordone B.A., University of Minnesota; J.D., Indiana; A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard M.F.A., Hamline University; M.St., Oxford Not Teaching 2009-2010

Lisa Bhansali Joseph N. Bowman B.A., B.S., University of Michigan; M.P.P., B.A., George Washington; J.D., Georgetown Columbia; J.D., Georgetown Nicholas J. Boyle Christina Biebesheimer LL.B., University of London; LL.M., Univer- B.A., University of Iowa; J.D., Harvard sity of Cambridge; LL.M., Harvard Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010

Eric R. Biel A. Jane Bradley B.A., Johns Hopkins; M.P.P., Princeton; J.D., B.A., Mary Washington; M.A., George Yale Washington

Edward K. M. Bilich Stephen L. Braga B.A., Wake Forest; J.D., Harvard B.A., Fairfield University; J.D., Georgetown

C. Coleman Bird Richard L. Brand A.B., Williams College; J.D., Harvard B.S.B.A., Georgetown; J.D., University of Pennsylvania Mark J. Biros A.B., Princeton; J.D., Georgetown Andrew Brandt B,A., Stanford; J.D., Georgetown Mary K. Bissell Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Yale; J.D., Georgetown Douglas M. Bregman Michael A. Blank B.A., Colgate; J.D., Georgetown A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard Daniel L. Brenner Gary F. Blemaster B.A., A.M., J.D., Stanford B.A., Ohio State; M.M., Northwestern; M.A., Columbia; M.S.P.P., Johns Hopkins William H. Briggs, Jr. A.B., Davidson; J.D., Duke Emanuel Tersh Boasberg Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Mary C. Brittingham B.A., Bard College; J.D., Antioch

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 145

Judith A. Browne-Dianis William F. Causey B.S., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., B.A., American University; J.D., University Columbia of Maryland Not Teaching 2009-2010 Reid P. Chambers John M. Bryson, II B.A., Amherst; M.A., Balliol College, B.S., J.D., University of Virginia Oxford; J.D., Harvard Not Teaching 2009-2010 William A. Butler B.A., Stanford; J.D., Yale; Ph.D., Harvard Scott Allen Chambers B.S., Ohio State; Ph.D., Florida State; J.D., Carla C. Calcagno George Washington B.A., J.D., Georgetown Steve S. Chang Ellen M. Callinan B.S., Ohio State; J.D., Temple B.A., Trinity College; M.S.L.S., Catholic University; J.D., William & Mary Douglas M. Chapin, Jr. B.A., Princeton; M.P.A, Harvard; J.D., Elizabeth H. Campbell Georgetown B.A., St. Lawrence; M.A., Ph.D., State University of New York, Binghamton Meryl J. Chertoff B.A., Harvard-Radcliffe; J.D., Harvard Nancy Chi Cantalupo B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown Mark E. Chopko B.S., University of Scranton; J.D., Cornell Joseph A. Carabillo B.A., William Paterson College; J.D., Seton James S. Cockburn Hall; LL.M., New York University LL.B., LL.M., Ph.D., Leeds University, England Anne-Marie Carstens Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., M.T., University of Virginia; J.D., Georgetown; D.Phil. Candidate, Faculty of June E. Cohan Law, University of Oxford B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., George- Not Teaching 2009-2010 town Not Teaching 2009-2010 Robert M. Cary B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., University of Virginia Barry E. Cohen Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.S., University of Illinois; J.D., North- western; LL.M., London School of Stephen Case Economics & Political Science A.B., LL.B., Columbia Not Teaching 2009-2010 George H. Cohen B.A., LL.B., Cornell; LL.M., Georgetown Ari S. Casper Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.S., University of Maryland; J.D., University of Baltimore

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 146 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

Peter J. Cohen George A. Davis B.A., Princeton; M.D., Columbia; J.D., B.S., State University of New York, Bing- Georgetown hamton; J.D., Hofstra

Jeremiah C. Collins Jennifer Locke Davitt B.S., J.D., Georgetown B.A., Middlebury; J.D., Duke; M.L.I.S., University of Washington John T. Collins B.A., Holy Cross; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Eric Delinsky B.A., Tufts; J.D., Georgetown The Honorable John O. Colvin Not Teaching 2009-2010 A.B., University of Missouri; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Duncan DeVille Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.S., University of Louisiana; J.D., University of Denver; M.P.A., Harvard; LL.M., Oxford Paul J. Connors B.A., Holy Cross; M.D., University of Elizabeth Dewey Maryland; J.D., George Washington B.A., University of Tulsa; J.D., American University Kevin T. Conry B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown John F. Dienelt B.A., University of Virginia; M.A., Tufts; James L. Cooper LL.B., Yale A.B., A.M., University of Chicago; J.D., Ph.D., Indiana Timothy Dowling B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., Marc S. Cooperman Georgetown B.S.M.E., J.D., University of Illinois Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010 Michael R. Dreeben Cathy A. Costantino B.A., University of Wisconsin; M.A., Univer- B.A., M.S.W., Catholic University; J.D., sity of Chicago; J.D., Duke University of California, Berkeley Not Teaching 2009-2010

Carolyn Cox Pascale Helene Dubois B.A., Agnes Scott College; J.D., Yale Lic. Jur., University of Ghent, Belgium; LL.M., New York University Scott S. Dahl B.A., J.D., University of Texas Michael M. DuBose A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard Florrie Darwin Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Columbia; J.D., Harvard Richard P. Dulik Harold J. Datz B.S., M.S.E., Case Western Reserve; J.D., B.A., LL.B., University of Florida Yale

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 147

Catherine M. Dunn Amy Fettig B.A., J.D., University of Michigan; B.A., Carleton; M.A., Columbia; J.D., M.S.L.I.S., University of Illinois, Urbana- Georgetown Champaign Not Teaching 2009-2010

Charles L. Edson Dante Figueroa B.A., J.D., Harvard J.D., University of Concepción School of Not Teaching 2009-2010 Law, Chile; LL.M., University of Chile; LL.M., American University Susan H. Ehringhaus B.A., J.D., University of North Carolina The Honorable Nancy B. Firestone Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Washington University; J.D., University of Missouri Mark C. Ellenberg B.S., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown Salvatore Fiscina A.B., Harvard; M.D., University of Roch- E. Donald Elliott ester; J.D., George Washington B.A., J.D., Yale The Honorable Gerald I. Fisher W. Mason Emnett B.A., William & Mary; J.D., Catholic B.A., University of Texas, Arlington; J.D., University Georgetown Luin Fitch Emily F. Epstein B.A., Johns Hopkins; LL.B., Columbia B.A., Connecticut College; J.D. Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 James F. Fitzpatrick A.B., J.D., Indiana Julia L. Ernst B.A., Yale; J.D., M.A., University of Andrew Fois Michigan B.A., Georgetown; M.A., University of Essex, London; J.D., Georgetown Robert Fabrikant Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Georgetown The Honorable Maurice B. Foley Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Swarthmore; J.D., University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley; LL.M., Georgetown Kenneth R. Feinberg B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., New Joel M. Freed York University B.A., B.S.M.E., Lehigh; J.D., Georgetown

Mark J. Feldstein Jim Freeman B.A., B.S., George Washington; M.S., B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., University of Chicago; Ph.D., University of Harvard Pennsylvania; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 148 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

Rabbi Barry Freundel Richard W. Gibson B.A., Yeshiva College; B.S., Erna Michael A.B., Fordham; J.D., Catholic University College of Hebraic Studies; M.S., Bernard Not Teaching 2009-2010 Revel Graduate School; Ph.D., Baltimore Hebrew University John Gillick A.B., Colgate; J.D., Georgetown Michael S. Frisch B.A., Case Western Reserve; J.D., George- Jonathan Gimblett town B.A., Cambridge; J.D., Georgetown

Patricia Mullahy Fugere Edward M. Gleason, Jr. A.B., J.D., Georgetown B.A., Fordham; J.D., Dickinson Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010

R. Michael Gadbaw Jonah Goldman B.A., Fordham; M.A., Tufts; J.D., University B.A., Binghamton; J.D., Boston College of Michigan Michael Goldman The Honorable Arthur J. Gajarsa B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., B.S.E.E., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Georgetown M.A., Catholic University; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010

Scott Gant Deborah Heller Goldstein B.A., Wesleyan; J.D., Harvard A.B., Williams College; J.D., Boston College

Adrian Robert Gardner Jordan B. Goldstein B.A., Northeastern; M.P.P., J.D., Harvard B.A., University of Wisconsin; M.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Stanford Jorge Gastelumendi J.D., Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Randolph M. Goodman Peru; MSc., University of Calgary; M.P.A., B.A., Franklin and Marshall; LL.M., New Harvard York University; J.D., Rutgers Not Teaching 2009-2010 Jon M. Greenbaum Russell A. Gaudreau, Jr. B.A., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., University of California, Los Angeles Suffolk; LL.M., New York University Mark H. Greenberg Christian S. Genetski A.B., J.D., Harvard B.A., Birmingham-Southern College; J.D., Not Teaching 2009-2010 Vanderbilt Julia E. Griffith Elizabeth S. Gere B.A., Oberlin; M.Phil., Cambridge; J.D., B.A., Denison; J.D., George Washington New York University Not Teaching 2009-2010

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 149

Peter B. Gronvall Bennett L. Hecht B.A., University of Minnesota; J.D., Yale B.S., University of Maryland; J.D., George- town Deepak Gupta Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Fordham; J.D., Georgetown Ronald Hedges Gary Guzy B.A., University of Maryland; J.D., George- B.A., J.D., Cornell town

John D. Hagner Owen E. Herrnstadt B.S.M.E., University of Cincinnati; J.D., B.S., M.S., J.D., University of Wisconsin Georgetown John Hinton Edward A. Hailes B.A., Union College; J.D., Dickinson B.A., J.D., Howard University Not Teaching 2009-2010 John C. Hirsh B.A., Boston College; M.A., Ph.D., Lehigh; Warren Hamel Post-Doctoral Study in Education, University B.A., Princeton. M.A., University of Sussex; of California, Berkeley J.D., Columbia Not Teaching 2009-2010 James G. Hodge, Jr. B.S., College of Charleston; J.D., Northern William J. Hardy Kentucky; LL.M., Georgetown B.S., Boston College; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010

Timothy A. Harr Gary N. Horlick B.A., Princeton; J.D., University of Virginia A.B., Dartmouth; B.A., M.A., Cambridge; J.D., Yale Todd Harris B.A., Birmingham-Southern College; J.D., Richard C. Hotvedt M.A.R., Yale B.S., Marquette; LL.B., Harvard Not Teaching 2009-2010 Patrick J. Houlihan Angela Hart-Edwards B.A., Boston College; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Rutgers; J.D., LL.M., Temple Not Teaching 2009-2010 Robert K. Huffman B.A., Harvard; J.D., Stanford Michael R. Hatcher A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Georgetown James Hunt B.A., University of Notre Dame; B.S., Roch- John C. Hayes, Jr. ester Institute of Technology B.A., Williams College; J.D., George Wash- ington Michael J. Huppe B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 150 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

John A. Hurvitz Michael D. Jones B.A., Haverford; J.D., Yale B.A., Dillard University; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Kenneth Jost Philip T. Inglima A.B., Harvard; J.D., Georgetown A.B., J.D. Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Jane Juliano B.A., University of Colorado; J.D., George- William G. Isasi town B.S., University of Illinois, Champaign- Urbana; J.D., Georgetown Alida Kass A.B., Duke; J.D., Georgetown David B. Isbell B.A., LL.B., Yale Robert J. Kasunic B.A., Columbia; J.D., University of Baltimore The Honorable Craig Iscoe B.A., University of Texas; J.D., Stanford; Robert Kengle LL.M., Georgetown B.A., Allegheny; J.D., Antioch

Samuel S. Jackson, Jr. Thomas F. Kaufman A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of North B.S.E.E., State University of New York, Carolina Buffalo; J.D., Georgetown; M.B.A., Univer- sity of Pennsylvania Joanna Jacobs B.A., University of New Mexico; J.D., Erin Rahne Kidwell Catholic University B.A., Ohio State; J.D., Capital University; Not Teaching 2009-2010 LL.M., S.J.D., Georgetown

Kumar Percy Jayasuriya Richard F. Kingham B.A., J.D., Tulane; M.L.I.S., San Jose State B.A., George Washington; J.D., University of Virginia Stephen Jeffries B.A., J.D., Wake Forest Michael T. Kirkpatrick Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Texas Christian; J.D., American University Marcia Johnson-Blanco B.A., Georgetown; J.D., Villanova Paul Yoshio Kiyonaga B.A., University of North Carolina, Chapel Charles A. Jones Hill; J.D., Harvard B.A. University of Virginia; J.D., Georgetown Alisa B. Klein Tristan Jones A.B., Princeton; J.D., Harvard B.A., Cambridge; M.P.A. Harvard; Graduate Diploma in Law, City University London Kondi Kleinman Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Arizona State; J.D., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 151

W. Gary Kohlman Paul B. Larsen B.B.A., LL.B., University of Michigan LL.B., University of Cincinnati; LL.M., New York University and McGill University, Adam Kolker Montreal B.A., Swarthmore; J.D., Yale John L. Laster Mark L. Kovner A.B., Oberlin; J.D., Catholic University B.A., Brandeis; J.D., Georgetown Weldon H. Latham Thomas W. Krause B.A., Howard; J.D., Georgetown B.S., University of Illinois; J.D., Harvard Kenneth A. Lazarus Frederick J. Krebs B.A., University of Dayton; J.D., University University of Manchester, England; B.A., of Notre Dame; LL.M., George Washington Allegheny; J.D., Case Western Reserve Not Teaching 2009-2010 The Honorable Lynn Leibovitz B.A., Brown; J.D., Georgetown Ken Krisko Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.S., Virginia Tech; J.D., University of Virginia The Honorable Richard J. Leon A.B., Holy Cross; J.D., Suffolk; LL.M., David R. Kuney Harvard B.A., J.D., University of Virginia Nancy F. Lesser Steven R. Kuney B.A., City College of New York; M.A., B.A., Wesleyan; M.A., J.D., University of University of Virginia; J.D., Georgetown Pennsylvania Not Teaching 2009-2010

Kenneth E. Labowitz Kathleen Joann Lester B.A., Grinnell College; J.D., Southern Meth- B.A., DePauw; J.D., Georgetown; M.P.H., odist University Johns Hopkins Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010

Esther F. Lardent Lee Levine B.A., Brown; J.D., University of Chicago B.A., M.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Not Teaching 2009-2010 Yale Not Teaching 2009-2010 The Honorable David Laro B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., University Mark S. Levinstein of Illinois; LL.M., New York University B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard

Christophe J. Larouer Michael J. Levitin LL.M., University of Nice School of Law; A.B., J.D., Harvard; M.A.L.D., Tufts LL.M., S.J.D. Candidate, Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 152 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

Joshua A. Levy Stacy M. Ludwig A.B., M.A., Columbia; J.D., University of B.A., J.D., University of Wisconsin Michigan John E. Lynch Michael K. Lewis B.S., Fordham; J.D., Georgetown A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Timothy G. Lynch B.A., University of Rochester; J.D., George- Judith Lichtenberg town B.A., M.A., University of Wisconsin; Ph.D., City College of New York Joan A. Magagna B.A., University of Wyoming; M.A., J.D., Erika Lietzan Georgetown B.A., University of North Carolina; M.A., Not Teaching 2009-2010 University of California, Los Angeles; J.D., Duke Tara Magner B.A., Wesleyan; J.D., Georgetown Carl Liggio B.A., Georgetown; J.D., New York Univer- Gerald A. Malia sity B.S., St. Peter’s College; J.D., LL.M., George- Not Teaching 2009-2010 town

Nancy J. Linck Jonathan Marcus Ph.D., University of California, San Diego; B.A., J.D., Yale J.D., Western New England College R. Paul Margie Robert Allen Long, Jr. B.A., Haverford; J.D., University of Chicago B.A., University of North Carolina; B.A., Oxford; J.D., Yale David R. Marsh B.Sc., University of London; Ph.D., Institute Catherine Lotrionte of Plant Science Research, England; C.P.E., B.A., University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Nottingham Law School, England; J.D., New J.D., New York University; M.A., George- York University town Not Teaching 2009-2010 Susan Martin B.A., Rutgers; M.A., Ph.D., University of Jonathan R. Lovvorn Pennsylvania B.A., University of California, Santa Barbara; J.D., University of California, San Francisco; Thomas B. Mason LL.M., Lewis & Clark B.A., Yale; J.D., Columbia

Abbe David Lowell Elisa C. Massimino B.A., J.D., Columbia B.A., Trinity University; M.A., Johns Not Teaching 2009-2010 Hopkins; J.D., University of Michigan Not Teaching 2009-2010

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 153

Erik S. Maurer Jonathan E. Missner B.S., University of Illinois; J.D., North- B.A., Johns Hopkins; M.B.A., George western Washington; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Denis Mitchell Colman McCarthy B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., University B.S., Spring Hill College; five honorary of Maryland degrees The Honorable Gregory E. Mize C. Dean McGrath, Jr. B.A., Loyola University, Chicago; S.T.B., St. B.A., Duke; J.D., University of Nebraska Mary of the Lake University; J.D., George- town Caroline Judge Mehta B.A., University of Vermont; J.D., Harvard The Honorable Robert E. Morin B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., Robert Meltz Catholic University B.A., M.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Georgetown Mark C. Murphy B.A., University of Texas; M.A., Ph.D., Joseph A. Micallef University of Notre Dame B.E.E., Catholic University; J.D., University Not Teaching 2009-2010 of Virginia Robert F. Muse Betsy A. Miller B.S., Boston College; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard Glen Nager Glenn H. Miller B.B.A., University of Texas, Austin; J.D., B.A., University of Iowa; M.D., University of Stanford Chicago Irvin B. Nathan Laurel E. Miller B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Columbia A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Chicago Guy S. Neal Samuel C. Miller, III B.A., William & Mary; J.D., Georgetown B.S., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; J.D., Georgetown Brent E. Newton B.A., University of North Carolina; J.D., Glenn E. Mincey Columbia B.A., J.D., Louisiana State; LL.M., George- town Allison Nichol B.A., Indiana; J.D., Valparaiso Helen Hill Minsker A.B., Vassar College; J.D., George Wash- Sharon Nokes ington B.Mus., Eastman School of Music; Mus., Manhattan School of Music; J.D., George- town

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 154 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

Michael D. Nolan Mark S. Popofsky A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Chicago A.B., Brown; J.D., Harvard

Michael Nussbaum Julia L. Porter B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., LL.M., University of B.A., University of Nebraska; J.D., George Chicago Washington

Rev. Raymond C. O’Brien Joseph M. Potenza B.A., La Salle; J.D., University of Virginia; B.S.E.E., Rochester Institute of Technology; M.Ch.A., D.Min., Catholic University J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Kirk Ogrosky B.A., Washington University; J.D., George Tom Pratt Washington B.S., J.D., University of Kansas Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010

Matthew G. Olsen Jeffrey F. Pryce B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard B.A., Wesleyan; M.Phil, Cambridge; J.D., Not Teaching 2009-2010 Yale

Nina E. Olson Michael S. Raab A.B., Bryn Mawr; J.D., North Carolina B.S., Indiana; J.D., Yale Central; LL.M., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Marylin J. Raisch B.A., Smith; M.Litt, St. Hugh’s College, Lee Liberman Otis Oxford; M.L.S, Columbia; J.D., Tulane B.A., Yale; J.D., University of Chicago Not Teaching 2009-2010

C. Christopher Parlin Meredith Rathbone B.A., Yale; Graduate Diploma, Johns B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown Hopkins; J.D., American University Not Teaching 2009-2010

Mark Perry Richard A. Ratner B.A., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., B.A., University of Chicago; M.D., Univer- University of Chicago sity of Pennsylvania

Joseph G. Petrosinelli Melissa G. Reinberg A.B., Brown; J.D., Georgetown A.B., Cornell; J.D., Harvard; LL.M., George- town Joseph D. Piorkowski, Jr. B.A., Hofstra; D.O., Philadelphia College of John P. Relman Osteopathic Medicine; J.D., Georgetown; B.A., Harvard. J.D., University of Michigan M.P.H., Johns Hopkins Not Teaching 2009-2010

Jonathan B. Pitt B.A., M.G.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Yale

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 155

Christopher J. Renk Paula N. Rubin B.S., Iowa State; J.D., University of Minne- B.A., University of Texas, Austin; J.D., State sota University of New York, Buffalo Not Teaching 2009-2010 Jonathan J. Rusch Jennifer Lee Renne A.B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., University of B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Virginia Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Bennett Rushkoff A.B., Princeton; J.D., Yale Daniel A. Rezneck B.A., LL.B., Harvard Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter B.A., Syracuse; J.D., Northwestern Judit Rius Sanjuan Licenciatura en Derecho (J.D. equivalent), Douglas B. Rutzen M.A., Pompeu Fabra University; LL.M., B.A., Cornell; J.D., Yale Stanford Susan Ryan Robert Rizzi B.A., M.A., American University; M.L.S., A.B., Princeton; M.Litt., Oxford; J.D., University of Maryland Harvard Charles P. Sabatino Stewart C. Robinson, Jr. A.B., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown B.A., J.D., University of Texas, Austin Sara A. Sampson Margaret Ellen Roggensack B.S., J.D., Ohio State; M.L.I.S., Kent State B.A., Carleton College; J.D., George Wash- ington David N. Saperstein B.A., Cornell; M.H.L., Hebrew Union Armin Rosencranz College; J.D., American University A.B., Princeton; J.D., M.A., Ph.D., Stanford Richard A. Sauber Eric Rosenthal B.A., Yale; J.D., New York University; M. B.A., University of Chicago; J.D., George- Litt., Oxford town Not Teaching 2009-2010 Not Teaching 2009-2010 Hans Sauer Michael L. Rosenthal M.S., University of Ulm, Germany; Ph.D., B.S., Cornell; J.D., Harvard University of Lund, Sweden; J.D., Georgeton

Marc Rotenberg Michael G. Scheininger A.B., Harvard; J.D., Stanford B.A., Franklin and Marshall; J.D., University of Pennsylvania Lukasz Rozdeiczer J.D., Warsaw University; Diploma, British Lois J. Schiffer and European Legal Studies, Cambridge and A.B., Radcliffe; J.D., Harvard Warsaw; LL.M., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 156 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

Mark D. Schneider Linda R. Singer B.A., Haverford; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Radcliffe; J.D., George Washington Not Teaching 2009-2010 Matthew Schruers B.A., Duke; J.D., University of Virginia Arthur Siskind B.A., J.D., Cornell Steven Schulman Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Brandeis; J.D., Northwestern Paula Skedsvold Eric J. Schwartz J.D., Georgetown; Ph.D., University of South B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., American Univer- Carolina sity Not Teaching 2009-2010

Sara D. Schotland Eric B. Sloan A.B., Harvard; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Northwestern; J.D., University of Chicago; LL.M., Georgetown Sandra L. Schubert Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., University of California; J.D., M.A., University of Colorado Petra Smeltzer B.S., M.S., Prague School of Economics; J.D., Philip Sechler Georgetown B.S., Pennsylvania State; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Marilyn G. Sneiderman B.A., M.A., University of Wisconsin A. Christopher Sega Not Teaching 2009-2010 A.B., Dartmouth; M.B.A., George Wash- ington; J.D., Catholic University Dr. Gary D. Solis B.A., San Diego State; J.D., University of Zoe Segal-Reichlin California, Davis; LL.M., George Wash- B.A., Brown; J.D., Harvard ington; Ph.D., London School of Economics & Political Science Sandra A. Sellers B.A., Dickinson; J.D., George Washington Steven P. Solow B.A., Brown; J.D., New York University Anthony W. Shaw Not Teaching 2009-2010 A.B., M.Eng., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Debra L. Soltis B.A., Duquesne; J.D., Georgetown Andrew J. Sherman B.A., University of Maryland; J.D., American Michael J. Songer University B.S., B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., Duke Scott A. Siff A.B., J.D., Harvard Frederic G. Sourgens United World College of the Adriatic, Duino, David C. Simmons Italy; Candidatus Magisterii, University of B.A., Howard; J.D., Georgetown Oslo; M.A., University of York; J.D., Tulane

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 157

The Honorable Timothy C. Stanceu Rachel Taylor A.B., Colgate; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Colgate; J.D., Georgetown

Valerie J. Stanley Ryan Taylor A.B., Goucher; J.D., Catholic University B.S., M.S., Stanford; J.D., Harvard Not Teaching 2009-2010 William Taylor John Reed Stark B.A., Brooklyn College, City University of B.A., Union College; J.D., Duke New York; LL.B., Yale Not Teaching 2009-2010 Jacob A. Stein A.A., LL.B., George Washington Stephen P. Teret B.A., St. Lawrence University; J.D., Brooklyn Mark B. Stern Law School; M.P.H., Johns Hopkins B.A., Antioch; M.A., Brandeis; M.A., Boston Not Teaching 2009-2010 College; J.D., Harvard Albert Tramposch David P. Stewart A.B., Johns Hopkins; J.D. University of B.A., Princeton; M.A., J.D., Yale; LL.M., Washington New York University Not Teaching 2009-2010

Richard S. Stockton Anthony C. Tridico B.S., University of Illinois, Urbana-Cham- B.S., La Salle; M.S., Ph.D., J.D., Georgetown paign; J.D., University of Illinois Andrew S. Tulumello Leslie A. Street A.B., J.D., Harvard B.A., J.D., Brigham Young University; M.L.I.S., University of Washington Alexander Türk 1st State Law Exam, M.A., University of Julia E. Sullivan Augsburg; 2nd State Law Exam, OLG B.A., Texas A&M; J.D., American University München; LL.M., College of Europe; Ph.D., Not Teaching 2009-2010 University of London/King’s College

David A. Super Alan D. Ullberg A.B., Princeton; J.D., Harvard B.A., Reed; LL.B., Harvard

Florence M. Sutter Carl L. Vacketta J.D., Duke; LL.B., LL.M., University of Paris B.S., University of Illinois, Urbana-Cham- 2, -Assas paign; J.D., University of Illinois

Michael E. Tankersley Francis A. Vasquez, Jr. B.A., William & Mary; J.D., Harvard B.S., California Institute of Technology; J.D., Not Teaching 2009-2010 Georgetown

John D. Taurman Mary H. Vasquez A.B., Duke; J.D., Harvard B.A., Marquette; M.A. University of Scranton; J.D. Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 158 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty

Aaron J. Velli Ralph Wilde B.A., Brown; J.D., University of Maryland B.Sc., London School of Economics & Political Science; C.P.E., M.A., City Univer- Todd M. Venie sity, London; Diploma in European Human B.A., Indiana; J.D., Ohio State; M.L.I.S., Rights Law, European University Institute, University of North Carolina Florence; LL.M., Ph.D., Cambridge

Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. Andrew D. Wolvin B.A., Yale; J.D., Columbia B.S., M.A., University of Nebraska; Ph.D., Not Teaching 2009-2010 Purdue

John K. Villa Jay Kelly Wright A.B., Duke; J.D., University of Michigan A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., M.P.P., Harvard Not Teaching 2009-2010 Thomas D. Yannucci Richard C. Visek A.B., J.D., University of Notre Dame A.B., Stanford; J.D., Georgetown; LL.M., Cambridge Steven Yerrid Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Louisiana State; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2009-2010 Don Wallace, Jr. B.A., Yale; LL.B., Harvard Gordon M. Speights Young B.A., J.D., Southern Methodist Robert M. Weinberg B.A., J.D., University of Michigan Peter R. Zeidenberg B.A., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Boston Jonathan M. Weisgall College B.A., Columbia; J.D., Stanford Allison M. Zieve Susan R. Weld A.B., Brown; J.D., Yale A.B., J.D., Harvard Jacqueline E. Zins Richard M. Whiting B.A., Princeton; J.D. Yale B.A., State University of New York, Bing- Not Teaching 2009-2010 hamton; J.D., Boston College; Graduate, Stonier School of Banking, Rutgers James W. Zirkle B.S., Carson-Newman; J.D., University of Bruce T. Wieder Tennessee; LL.M., Yale B.S., Cornell; M.B.A., J.D., University of Texas, Austin Marc J. Zwillinger Not Teaching 2009-2010 B.A., Tufts; J.D., Harvard

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty 159

APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAMS ADJUNCT FACULTY

Reijo Aarnio Benjamin E Berkman University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law; B.A., Harvard; M.P.H., J.D., University of Honorary Doctor of Law, University of Michigan Lapland Kenneth J. Berman Syed Arif Hyder Ali B.A., Dickinson; J.D., University of Chicago B.A., Columbia; J.D., New York University Suzana Medeiros Blades Michele M. Anderson J.D., State University of Rio de Janeiro; B.A., University of Colorado, Boulder; J.D., Masters of Law, University of Rio de Janeiro; University of Colorado LL.M. (International Legal Studies), New York University Paul M. Architzel B.A., State University of New York, Albany; Samuel A. Bleicher J.D., George Washington B.A., Northwestern; J.D., Harvard

Lucille Barale Bradley Bondi B.A., Georgetown; M.A., University of B.S., M.B.A., J.D., University of Florida; Hawaii; J.D., George Washington LL.M., Georgetown

Barry P. Barbash Mark A. Borges A.B., Bowdoin; J.D., Cornell B.A., Humboldt State; J.D., Santa Clara University; LL.M.(Taxation), New York John P. Barrie University J.D., University of California; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University William K. Bortz B.A., University of Maryland; Ph.D., LL.M., G. William Beard University of Wisconsin B.S., Ohio State; J.D., Toledo William P. Bowers Edward J. Beckwith B.B.A.A., Texas A&M; J.D., Southern B.S., Pennsylvania State; J.D., Methodist University; LL.M.(Taxation), LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Georgetown

Dennis P. Bedell Trevor G. Bowler A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Michigan J.D., University of Richmond; LL.B. Hons, University of Wolverhampton, England; Ray Beeman LL.M.(Taxation), New York University B.S., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., Pepperdine; LL.M. (Taxation), Boston A. Jane Bradley University B.A., Mary Washington; M.A., George Washington Christopher J. Bellini B.B.A., University of Massachusetts, Amherst; J.D., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 160 Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty

Gilda Brancato Phyllis Cela B.A., State University of New York, Stony B.A., Tufts; J.D., Boston College Brook; J.D., New York University Christina M. Cerna Mark N. Bravin B.A., New York University; M.A., Ludwig- B.A., University of California, Los Angeles; Maximilian Universitat; J.D., American M.P.P., J.D., Harvard University; LL.M., Columbia

Lorraine M. Brennan Douglas W. Charnas B.A., Cornell; M.A.L.D., Tufts; J.D., Suffolk; A.B., Ohio University, Honors Tutorial DES, Institut des Hautes Etudes, Geneva, College; J.D., Case Western Reserve; Switzerland LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown

Timothy C. Brightbill Richard F. Chovanec B.S., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Virginia Tech; J.D., William & Mary; LL.M., Georgetown Boyd J. Brown II B.A., Swarthmore; M.T.S., Duke; J.D., Bryon Christensen University of Virginia; LL.M., Georgetown B.A, Brigham Young University; J.D., Univer- sity of Chicago Ronald L. Buch Jr. B.B.A., Northwood University; J.D., Detroit Larry E. Christensen College of Law; LL.M., Capital University B.A., University of South Dakota; J.D., Duke

Ethan S. Burger David Stewart Christy, Jr. A.B., Harvard; J.D., Georgetown B.A., University of Kansas; J.D., University of Chicago R. Clif Burns B.A., J.D., Northwestern Alexander F. Cohen B.A., M.A., J.D., Yale Oscar A. Cabrera Abogado (J.D. equivalent), Universidad Arthur Cohen Católica Andrés Bello, Caracas, Venezuela; B.A., Yale; J.D., Columbia LL.M., University of Toronto Alan D. Cohn Richard A. Capino B.A., Columbia; J.D., Georgetown B.A., J.D., University of Maryland; M.B.A., Old Dominion Bryan P. Collins B.B.A.(Accounting), J.D., University of Brandon Cash Carlton Texas; LL.M.(Taxation), New York Univer- B.S., Brigham Young University; M.B.A., sity University of Utah; J.D., University of Texas; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Andrea M. Corcoran A.B., Stanford; LL.B., Harvard Robert T. Carney B.A., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty 161

Robert J. Crnkovich Eli J. Dicker B.S., J.D., Marquette; LL.M.(Taxation), B.A., M.A., Queens College, City Univer- Georgetown; CPA sity of New York; J.D., Northeastern; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University David B. Cubeta B.A., Colgate; J.D., Albany Law School Donald R. Dinan B.S., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., David J. Curtin Georgetown; LL.M., London School of B.A., J.D., St. Louis University Economics

Robert E. Dalton Marc B. Dorfman A.B., Holy Cross; LL.B., Columbia A.B., Yale; J.D., Harvard

Julie W. Davis Derek B. Dorn B.A., Duke; J.D., LL.M.(Taxation), George- B.S., Cornell; J.D., Yale town Jonathan Charles Drimmer William Davis B.A., Stanford; J.D., University of California, A.B., University of North Carolina, Chapel Los Angeles Hill; J.D., William & Mary Paul Dudek Lloyd De Vos B.A., Fordham; J.D., New York University B.A., B.B.A., Kent State; J.D., Georgetown; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Christopher F. Dugan B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Georgetown Warren L. Dean B.A., J.D., University of Maryland; Leah Durner LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown B.S., University of North Carolina, Char- lotte; J.D., Wake Forest Bruce Decker B.A., J.D., Michigan State; LL.M., New York Jesse F. Eggert University A.B., J.D., Cornell

Monica M. DeLong Henry Charles Eickelberg B.A., Southern Adventist University; J.D., B.A., DePaul University; J.D., LL.M., John Georgetown Marshall Law School

Michael J. Desmond Andrew M. Eisenberg B.A., University of California, Santa Barbara; B.B.A., Mercer University; M.S.(Taxation), J.D., Catholic University American University; J.D., California Western; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Anne O’Connell Devereaux B.A., William & Mary; J.D., Catholic Peter I. Elinsky University; LL.M., Georgetown B.S., University of Connecticut; J.D., Suffolk; LL.M.(Taxation), Boston University

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 162 Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty

Jeffrey A. Erickson William J. Flanagan B.S., University of South Florida; J.D., B.S., J.D., Georgetown Capital University M. Grace Fleeman Julia L. Ernst B.S., Allegheny College; M.S.L.S., University B.A., Yale; J.D., M.A., University of of North Carolina; M.S.M. (M.B.A. equiva- Michigan lent), Frostburg State College; J.D., George Washington David M. Estabrook B.A., Stanford; M.B.A., University of Cali- Lynn Fraser fornia, Los Angeles; CPA B.A., Linfield College; M.A., Columbia Pacific University; J.D., Northwestern School Stacy Ettinger of Law at Lewis & Clark B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., American University; Graduate Studies, World Union Barbara S. Fredericks of Jewish Students Institute, Arad, Israel B.A., Case Western Reserve; J.D., Boston University William M. Evans B.A., Brigham Young University; J.D., Cynthia M. Frey University of Virginia B.A., University of California, Davis; J.D., George Washington; LL.M., Georgetown Marianne Evans B.B.S., J.D., Oklahoma City University; Jeffrey A. Friedman LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown; CPA B.S., J.D., University of Maryland; LL.M., Georgetown David Fagan B.S.F.S., Georgetown; J.D., New York Richard D. Fultz University B.A, J.D., University of Florida, Gainsesville; LL.M., Georgetown Philip Feigen B.S., Boston University; J.D., Catholic Joshua P. Galper University B.A., J.D., Yale

Mark B. Feldman David C. Garlock LL.B., Harvard; A.B., Wesleyan; Diplome, B.S., J.D., Harvard University of Paris Dennis O. Garris Thomas F. Field B.S., Youngstown State University; J.D., B.A., University of Notre Dame; M.A., Master of Taxation, University of Akron Oxford; J.D., Harvard; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Kristen Garry B.A., Cornell; J.D., New York University Frank J. Fisher B.A., J.D., University of Michigan; Elena Gasol Ramos M.B.A.(Finance), University of California, Law, University of Salamanca, Spain; Berkeley Masters in European Law, College of Europe in Brugges, Belgium; LL.M., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty 163

Craig Gibian James A. Gresser A.B., Princeton University; J.D., Harvard B.A., J.D., University of Notre Dame; LL.M., University of Cambridge Timothy Gillis B.S., Pensacola Christian College; J.D., Ana C. Guzman Georgetown B.A., Harvard; J.D., Columbia; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University John P. Gimigliano B.A., Miami University of Ohio; J.D., Avril Haines University of Cincinnati; LL.M.(Taxation), B.A., University of Chicago; J.D., George- Georgetown town

Chiara Giorgetti Sam F. Halabi European Union Erasmus Student, Université J.D., Harvard; M.Phil.(International Rela- Paris X, School of Law; J.D. equivalent, tions), University of Oxford University of Bologna, Italy; MSc, London School of Economics & Political Sciences; Paul M. Hamburger LL.M., J.S.D. (expected 2009), Yale B.A., J.D., University of Michigan

Herbert A. Glaser Kathleen Hamm B.A., Kalamazoo College; J.D., University of B.S., State University of New York, Buffalo; Michigan J.D., Duke; LL.M., Georgetown

Israel Goldowitz Kenneth W. Hansen B.A., Boston University; J.D., George A.B., M.P.A, Harvard; M.A., Yale; J.D., Washington University of Pennsylvania

Carl F. Goodman Ellen K. Harrison B.B.A., City College of New York, Baruch; B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., Harvard J.D., Brooklyn Law School; LL.M., George- town Nell A. Hennessy B.A., Michigan State; J.D., Catholic Univer- Patricio Grané sity; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown J.D., Universidad de Costa Rica; LL.M., Georgetown Mark E. Herlihy B.A., Boston College; J.D., University of John D. Graubert Chicago; LL.M. and IIEL Certificate in WTO B.A., Williams College; J.D., Georgetown Studies, Georgetown

Lauson C. Green Scott C. Herlihy B.A., Saint Lawrence University; J.D., B.B.A.(Accounting), William & Mary; J.D., Syracuse; LL.M., Georgetown Notre Dame

Eldon C. V. Greenberg Mark D. Higgins A.B., J.D., Harvard; C.E.P., Institut d’Etudes B.B.A., Baruch College; J.D., St. John’s Politiques de Paris University; LL.M., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 164 Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty

H. Carter Hood J. Walker Johnson A.B., J.D., Harvard; M.T., George Wash- B.A., Cornell; J.D., University of Kansas; ington LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown

Gary N. Horlick David S. Jonas A.B., Dartmouth; B.A., M.A., University of B.A., Denison; J.D., Wake Forest; LL.M., Cambridge; J.D., Yale The Judge Advocate General’s School; LL.M., Georgetown Jasper A. Howard B.S., University of Kentucky; J.D., Duke; Alison Jones LL.M.(Taxation), New York University B.A., Wheaton College; J.D., University of Georgia David S. Hudson B.S., J.D., George Mason University; Jean Kalicki LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown B.A., J.D., Harvard

Gary R. Huffman Mark Kantor B.S., University of Illinois; J.D., University of B.A., University of Southern California; Texas M.P.P., J.D., University of Michigan

Matthew Huggins Brian P. Kaufman B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard B.A., Duke; J.D., Northwestern; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Quyen P. Huynh B.A., Mount Holyoke College; J.D., Univer- Yoram Keinan, S.J.D. sity of San Diego; LL.M.(Taxation), George- B.A., LL.B., Tel Aviv University; town LL.M.(Taxation), Hebrew University; M.B.A., Bar Ilan University, Israel; M.P.A., Ali Adnan Ibrahim LL.M.(International Taxation), Harvard; LL.B. (Shariah and Law), International LL.M.(Taxation), J.S.D., University of Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan; Michigan LL.M., Washington University; S.J.D., Georgetown Kevin M. Keyes B.S., Bowling Green State University; J.D., Samuel S. Jackson, Jr. Case Western Reserve; CPA A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of North Carolina Andrew J. Keyso B.A., J.D., Temple; M.A., Miami University Frederick E. Jenney B.A., Yale; M.B.A., J.D., University of Daoud L. Khairallah Virginia Licence en Droit, Lebanese University; M.C.L., LL.M., S.J.D., University of Mark René Joelson Michigan A.B., J.D., Harvard; Diploma in Law, University of Oxford Philip S. Khinda B.A., J.D., Columbia

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty 165

David H. Kirk Stuart M. Lewis B.S., Syracuse University; J.D., University of B.A., J.D., University of Virginia Pittsburgh; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Alan M. Lieberman Gordon Klepper B.A., Franklin and Marshall; J.D.,Villanova B.S., Cornell; J.D., University of Virginia Robert Liquerman Jay R. Kraemer B.S., State University of New York, B.A., J.D., George Washington Binghamton; J.D., St. John’s University; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University John David Kraemer J.D., Georgetown; Master of Public Health Louis Lopez in infectious diseases, Johns Hopkins B.S., University of Kansas; J.D., Harvard; LL.M.(Labor & Employment), Georgetown Mark Kreitman B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Daniel W. Luchsinger B.S., University of Minnesota; J.D., George- Katrin Kuhlmann town B.A., Creighton University; J.D., Harvard Alexis MacIvor Bruce M. Larsen B.A., Colgate; J.D., University of Wash- B.S., Montana State; J.D., University of ington; LL.M.(Taxation), University of North Dakota; LL.M.(Taxation), Certificate Florida in Employee Benefits, Georgetown John B. Magee Albert G. Lauber, Jr. B.A., Pomona College; J.D., University of B.A., J.D., Yale Washington; LL.M., Georgetown

Kurt L.P. Lawson Col. Samuel Mahaney B.A., M.A., Yale; J.D., University of Virginia B.A., Missouri University of Science & Tech- nology; M.P.A., Troy University; J.D., St. Laura J. Lederer Louis University; National Security Fellow B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., DePaul at the Kennedy School of Government, University Harvard; Capitol Hill Fellow, Georgetown

Benedict M. Lenhart Kimberly T. Majure B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., Harvard B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Alan C. Levine A.B., Brown; J.D., Vanderbilt; Jeffrey Maletta LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown B.A., Harvard; J.D., Stanford

Micah A. Levy Mary Ann Mancini B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., B.A., Washington College; J.D., Catholic Boston University; LL.M.(Taxation), George- University; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown town

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 166 Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty

Jennifer A. Manner Charles R. Mills B.A., State University of New York, B.A., Occidental College; J.D., Georgetown Albany; J.D., New York Law School; LL.M.(International and Comparative Law), Kathleen M. Milton Georgetown A.B., Princeton; J.D., Harvard

William Massey Bernard E. Moens J.D., University of Arkansas, Fayetteville; LL.B., University of Antwerp, Nether- LL.M., Georgetown lands; LL.M., University of Chicago; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University D. Stephen Mathias B.S.F.S., Georgetown; J.D., Columbia John Norton Moore A.B., Drew University; LL.B., Duke; LL.M., Mohamed Y. Mattar University of Illinois LL.B., D.P.L., Alexandria University, Egypt; M.C.L., University of Miami; LL.M., S.J.D., Anne E. Moran Tulane B.A., Wellesley College; J.D., Harvard

Philip A. McCarty Helen H. Morrison B.S., University of Colorado; J.D., University B.A., Trinity College; J.D., Illinois Institute of Denver; LL.M.(Taxation), New York of Technology/Chicago-Kent College of Law University Fred F. Murray Jerry J. McCoy B.A., Rice University; J.D., University of B.S., West Virginia University; LL.B., Duke; Texas, Austin LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Veena K. Murthy Benn D. McGrady B.A., Barnard College, Columbia University; B.A./LL.B. Monash University, Australia; J.D., Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, LL.M.(Global Health Law) Georgetown; Yeshiva University; LL.M., Taxation, New Ph.D. (International Trade Law), Monash York University University, Australia Nazakhtar Nikakhtar Michael McTiernan B.A., University of California, Los Angeles; B.A., College of Wooster; J.D., Georgetown M.A., J.D., Syracuse

Allan I. Mendelsohn Donna Norman Diploma, Sorbonne; LL.B., University of B.A., University of Wisconsin; J.D., George- Illinois; LL.M., Harvard town

Dan L. Mendelson Francisco Miguel Noyola B.S., Indiana University; J.D., Licenciado en Derecho, Universidad La Salle; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown LL.M., J.D., Southern Methodist University

James Mendenhall Julia O’Brien B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., B.A., Princeton; M.S.W., University of Harvard Maryland; J.D., Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty 167

Eileen O’Connor C. Christopher Parlin B.S., J.D., Georgetown B.A., Yale; Graduate Diploma, SAIS, Johns Hopkins; J.D., American University Brian J. O’Connor J.D., Washington & Lee University; Marlon Q. Paz LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown B.A., Trinity College; M.A., Wesleyan; J.D., University of Pennsylvania Chang Oh B.A., M.A., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown Alan A. Pemberton B.A., University of Chicago; M.A., J.D., John T. Oliver University of Michigan B.A., Stanford; J.D., University of Wash- ington; LL.M. (International), S.J.D., Univer- Michael G. Pfeifer sity of Virginia A.B., Yale; J.D., Cornell; LL.M., New York University Eufrona A. O’Neill B.A., University of California, Long Beach; David Pickle J.D., Southwestern University B.A., Carleton College; J.D., University of Kansas Mercedes Ortuño Law, Complutense University of Madrid, Mark Plotkin Spain B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard

Gregory J. Ossi Mark Poerio B.A., Marquette University; J.D., LL.M., B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Cornell Georgetown Elliot E. Polebaum John R. Paliga B.A., Middlebury College; M.P.A., Harvard; B.S., Youngstown State; J.D., Ohio State; J.D., New York University LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Virginia Patton Prugh Cesar Parga B.A., Louisiana State; M.Ed., McNeese State Licenciado en Derecho-J.D., University of University; J.D., University of California, Guadalajara; Certificate for the International Hastings; LL.M., The Judge Advocate Trade Law Post-Graduate Course, The General’s School University Institute of European Studies & The International Training Center of the Mark S. Radke ILO, Turin, Italy; LL.M., S.J.D. (candidate), B.A., University of Washington; J.D., George Washington University of Baltimore; LL.M.(Securities), Georgetown Joseph M. Pari B.S., Providence College; J.D., Boston Albert C. Rees, Jr. College; LL.M.(Taxation), New York B.A., University of Southwestern Louisiana; University J.D., Loyola University, New Orleans; LL.M.(International & Comparative Law), Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 168 Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty

Arturo Requenez II Paul T. Saulski B.S., Texas Wesleyan University; B.A., Eastern Michigan University; M.A. J.D., Southern Methodist University; (East Asian Studies), J.D., Washington LL.M(Taxation), Georgetown University

Christopher S. Rizek Kirsten Schaetzel A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., LL.M.(Taxation), B.A., Wheaton College; MATESL, University Georgetown of Illinois; Ph.D., Boston University

Rebecca Rosenberg Paul M. Schmidt B.A., Bryn Mawr; J.D., Harvard; LL.M., B.S., Miami University; J.D., Georgetown LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown

Phil Rothenberg Steven Schneider B.A., University of Virginia; M.A., University B.S., University of Missouri; J.D., Wash- of South Carolina; J.D., Georgetown ington University; LL.M.(Taxation), George- town Robert Rudnick B.A., Colby College; J.D., Cornell Mark A. Schneider B.A., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., Jonathan J. Rusch LL.M., DePaul University A.B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., University of Virginia James A. Schoettler, Jr. B.A. (International Studies), Johns Hopkins; Susan Ryan M.S. (Foreign Service), J.D., Georgetown B.A., M.A., American University; M.L.S., University of Maryland, College Park A. Christopher Sega A.B., Dartmouth; M.B.A., George Wash- Babback Sabahi ington; J.D., Catholic University LL.B., University of Tehran School of Law; Master of Laws in Public International Law, Eric Serron Shahid Beheshti University Law School; B.A., M.A., J.D., University of Wisconsin J.D., Boston University; LL.M., University of Pennsylvania Theodore Setzer J.D., University of Arizona; LL.M., New Borzu Sabahi York University B.A., (Judicial Law-J.D. equivalent), M.A.(Public International Law), University David H. Shapiro of Tehran; LL.M. (International Legal A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Virginia, Studies), S.J.D. (candidate), Georgetown LL.M.(Taxation), New York University

Michael I. Sanders Craig A. Sharon B.S., LL.B., New York University; B.A., University of Idaho; J.D., Georgetown LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown; CPA Linda K. Shore B.A., Boston University; J.D., University of Michigan; LL.M.(Labor Law), Georgetown

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty 169

Michael Shulman Terence P. Stewart B.A., University of Chicago; J.D., Vanderbilt B.A., Holy Cross; M.B.A., Harvard; J.D., University; LL.M., New York University Georgetown

Alexander W. Sierck Barry N. Summer B.A., LL.B., University of Virginia B.S., University of Rhode Island; J.D., Georgetown Fr. Andrew Small Bachelor of Laws, University of Sheffield, C. David Swenson England; LL.M., Georgetown B.A., J.D., University of Mississippi; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Laurie B. Smilan B.A., State University of New York, Albany; Robert A. Swiech J.D., University of California, Los Angeles B.S., Illinois State University; M.S. Taxation, J.D., DePaul University Stafford Smiley B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Stephen B. Tackney B.A., Emory University; J.D., Harvard David Snelbecker B.A., Princeton; M.A., Ph.D., Harvard Ethiopis Tafara A.B., Princeton; J.D., Georgetown; Hague Eric Solomon Academy of International Law A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Virginia; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Philip M. Tatarowicz B.A., Illinois Benedictine College; Anita C. Soucy J.D., Northern Illinois University; B.A., Wheaton College; J.D., University of LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown; CPA Georgia; LL.M., Georgetown Leonard B. Terr Mark S. Srere A.B., LaSalle College; A.M., Ph.D., Brown; B.A., Reed College; J.D., University of Texas J.D., Cornell

Sanford W. Stark Karen Tramontano B.A., Yale; J.D., Duke B.A., Boston College; J.D., Catholic Univer- sity Samuel P. Starr B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., Marguerite Trossevin University of Virginia; LL.M.(Taxation), B.A., J.D., Villanova Georgetown; CPA Stephanie Tsacoumis Matthew A. Stevens B.A., William & Mary; J.D., University of B.A., University of Kansas; J.D., Harvard Virginia

Hugh Stevenson Stefan F. Tucker J.D., Harvard B.B.A., J.D., University of Michigan

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 170 Appendix C: Graduate Programs Adjunct Faculty

Mario A. Umaña Don Wallace, Jr. LL.B., Universidad Autónoma de B.A., Yale; LL.B., Harvard Centroamérica, San José, Costa Rica; LL.M.(Common Law), S.J.D. (candidate), Jennifer A. Warren Georgetown B.S., J.D., Georgetown

Daniel T. Vail Jayashree Watal B.A., Hamilton College; J.D., Harvard; Post-master’s degree in trade law (DESS), the LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown University of Paris-V; M.A. (Economics), Gokhale Institute for Politics and Economics, Debra Van Alstyne Pune, India; B.A., Fergusson College, Pune, B.S., University of California, Irvine; J.D., India University of California, Los Angeles Jacob Werksman Steve Varholik A.B., Columbia; J.D., University of B.A., University of California, Santa Barbara; Michigan; LL.M., University of London J.D., University of San Francisco; LL.M. (Securities and Financial Regulation), Lindsay Wiley Georgetown B.A., J.D., Harvard

Baiju S. Vasani Rose L. Williams LL.B., LL.M., B.C.L., London & Oxford; B.S., University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh; J.D., J.D., Northwestern University of Nebraska

John Vasily Roger Wise B.S.(Accounting), Villanova; J.D., George- B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard town Marcia A. Wiss Charles Owen Verrill, Jr. B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown A.B., Tufts; J.D., Duke Andrew D. Wolvin Thomas A. Vidano B.S., M.A., University of Nebraska; Ph.D., B.A., Stanford; J.D., University of California, Purdue Los Angeles; LL.M., University of San Diego Mark D. Young Marty Jo Wagner B.A., Tufts; J.D., Georgetown B.A., University of Maryland; J.D., George- town Leocadia I. Zak B.A., Mount Holyoke College; J.D., North- Kenneth L. Wainstein eastern B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., University of California, Berkeley H. Karl Zeswitz, Jr. B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., Donald A. Walker, Jr. Dickinson; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown A.B., Amherst; M.B.A., Dartmouth

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix D: Fahy Award Recipients 171

APPENDIX D: CHARLES FAHY DISTINGUISHED ADJUNCT PROFESSOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

Each year, hundreds of Washington, D.C., lawyers selflessly dedicate time and energy to teaching courses as adjunct professors at Georgetown Law. Their presence has enabled Georgetown Law to offer the most wide-ranging curriculum of J.D. and LL.M. courses in the country. To recognize the contributions of these adjuncts, the Law Center’s “hidden endowment,” the Dean designates for each academic year the recipients of the Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professor Award. Fahy Professors have provided exceptional service to Georgetown in teaching, curriculum development, student counseling, and involvement in extra-curricular Law Center activities. The award is named after the late Charles Fahy, a noted Georgetown alumnus who served as U.S. Solicitor General and U.S. Court of Appeals Judge.

1988-1989 1994-1995

Kenneth R. Feinberg, J.D. Program Daniel A. Rezneck, J.D. Program John Wolff, Graduate Program Bernard M. Shapiro, Graduate Program

1989-1990 1995-1996

Roger M. Adelman, J.D. Program Gerald A. Malia, J.D. Program Hugh J. Beins, Graduate Program Arthur F. Mathews, Graduate Program

1990-1991 1996-1997

Martin S. Thaler, J.D. Program Bennett L. Hecht, J.D. Program Earl M. Colson, Graduate Program Shirley A. Coffield, Graduate Program

1991-1992 1997-1998

Paul B. Larsen, J.D. Program Nancy Firestone, J.D. Program Charles Gordon, Graduate Program Lois J. Schiffer, J.D. Program Dennis P. Bedell, Graduate Program 1992-1993 1998-1999 Kirby Howlett, J.D. Program Harold J. Heltzer, Graduate Program David C. Vladeck, J.D. Program William R. Charyk, Graduate Program 1993-1994 1999-2000 Steven A. Winkelman, J.D. Program Charles Owen Verrill, Graduate Program Jack M. Beard, J.D. Program Michael T. Leibig, Graduate Program

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 172 Appendix D: Fahy Award Recipients

2000-2001 2007-2008

W. Shepherdson Abell, J.D. Program Douglas M. Bregman, J.D. Program Marcia A. Wiss, Graduate Program Warren L. Dean, Graduate Program Allan I. Mendelsohn, Graduate Program 2001-2002 2008-2009 John C. Hayes, Jr., J.D. Program Michael G. Scheininger, J.D. Program David B. Isbell, J.D. Program Michael I. Sanders, Graduate Program Edward J. Beckwith, Graduate Program A. Christopher Sega, Graduate Program 2002-2003

The Hon. Laurence H. Silberman, J.D. Program John L. Buckley, Graduate Program The Hon. John O. Colvin, Graduate Program

2003-2004

The Hon. Gerald I. Fisher, J.D. Program The Hon. Robert E. Morin, J.D. Program Robert Dalton, Graduate Program David Stewart, Graduate Program

2004-2005

Michael Frisch, J.D. Program Mark Kreitman, Graduate Program Mark S. Radke, Graduate Program

2005-2006

Michael S. Raab, J.D. Program Carl F. Goodman, Graduate Program Mark Kantor, Graduate Program

2006-2007

William F. Causey, J.D. Program Elizabeth S. Gere, J.D. Program Peter I. Elinsky, Graduate Program

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix E: Scholarships 173

APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS Georgetown Law named scholarship awards are made possible through the generosity of Law Center alumni and friends, law firms, corporations, and foundations. Awards are based on demonstrated financial need in accordance with the policies of the Law Center. Students inter- ested in applying for these scholarships should contact the Financial Aid Office for information on financial aid procedures and deadlines.

African-American Endowed Scholar- Joseph Asper Esq. and his mother, ship: Established by Law Center alumni/ae Anna Asper, Endowed Scholarship to be awarded with preference to African- Fund: Established by Edna Asper Elkouri, American J.D. students with demonstrated as Personal Representative of the estate of financial need. her brother, Joseph Asper, L’48, L.L.M’59, in honor of Joseph Asper and their mother, Alumni Scholarship: Established by the Anna Asper, to be awarded to students with Washington Club to be awarded to students demonstrated financial need with a prefer- from the Washington metro area. ence for high academic achievement.

Judith C. Areen Endowed Scholarship Association of Securities and Fund: Established by alumni and friends Exchange Commission Alumni Schol- of Georgetown University Law Center in arship: Established by the Association honor of Judith C. Areen for her fifteen years of Securities and Exchange Commission of distinguished service as Dean of the Law Alumni, Inc., to assist one or more deserving Center, to be awarded to law students with J.D. or LL.M. students who are current or demonstrated financial need. former employees of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Arnold & Porter Scholarship: Estab- lished by the law firm of Arnold & Porter, to Attridge Family Opportunity Schol- be awarded to a first year law student with arship: Current-use scholarship fund demonstrated financial need who contributes established by Missy Asbill Attridge, L’80, to the diverse economic educational and and Daniel F. Attridge, L’79, to promote ethnic background of the Law Center’s economic diversity within the Law Center student body. student body.

Pedro Arrupe, S.J., Scholarship in Andrew Hull Baker Scholarship: Peace: Established by an anonymous donor Established by the late Daniel W. Baker, to honor the former Superior General of the LL.B. 1892, LL.M. 1893, a former United Society of Jesus, Pedro Arrupe, who inspired States district attorney and professor at the Jesuits and others to integrate a commit- Law Center. ment to social justice into their faith. The Scholarship is to be awarded with preference Baker & McKenzie Scholarship Fund: to students with limited financial resources Established by the law firm of Baker & from troubled areas of the world, with the McKenzie to be awarded to students with hope that their Georgetown experience will demonstrated financial need who contribute not only benefit the students directly, but also to the diverse economic, educational, and their communities upon their return. ethnic background of the Law Center’s student body.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 174 Appendix E: Scholarships

Rudolph B. and Suevia Nordlinger Jeanne Carpenter Memorial Scholar- Behrend Scholarship: Established by ship: Established by Jeanne Carpenter’s Amy Behrend Goldstein and Ruth Behrend classmates from the Georgetown Law Small in memory of their beloved parents. Class of 1977 to honor and remember Ms. Rudolph B. Behrend was an outstanding Carpenter on the occasion of their 30th law graduate and the valedictorian of the Class school reunion. of 1897 and the Class of 1898. Churchill Family Endowed Scholar- Caryl S. Bernstein Scholarship: Estab- ship Fund: Established by Winston J. lished by Caryl S. Bernstein, L’67, a distin- Churchill, Jr. guished and loyal alumna. Class of 1953 Endowed Scholarship George W. Bilicic Endowed Scholar- Fund: Established by members of the Class ship Fund: Established by George W.Bilicic, of 1953 in honor of their 50th Law Reunion, Jr., L’88, to be awarded to law students with to be awarded to law students with demon- demonstrated financial need. strated financial need.

Michael E. and Carol S. Bleier Coca-Cola Scholarship Fund: Estab- Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established lished by the Coca-Cola Company. by Michael E. Bleier, L’65, and Carol S. Bleier, to be awarded to law students with Robert M. Coffelt Endowed Scholar- demonstrated financial need. ship Fund: Established in memory of Robert M. Coffelt, L’48, by his wife, Annetta James E. Blower Memorial Schol- J. Coffelt, and his son, Robert M. Coffelt, arship: Established in memory of her Jr., to assist law students with demonstrated husband, James E. Blower, L’49, by his wife, financial need who aspire to careers in public Betty. interest law.

Bruce and Ann Blume Endowed Sarah E. Cogan Opportunity Scholar- Scholarship Fund: Established by Bruce ship: Current-use scholarship fund estab- Blume, L’80, and his wife, Ann, to be lished by Sarah E. Cogan, L’81, to be used to awarded to law students with demonstrated promote economic diversity within the Law financial need. Center student body.

Stanley M. Brand Scholarship Fund: The Theodore Cogswell Scholar- Established by Stanley M. Brand, L’74, ship: Established in memory of Theodore a distinguished and loyal alumnus, to be Cogswell, L’16, by Elaine Ward Cogswell. awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Lester Cohen Memorial Scholarship: Established by the law firm of Hogan & Bernie R. Burrus Memorial Scholar- Hartson in memory of Lester Cohen, L’35, to ship Fund: Established in memory of be awarded to a third year law student with Professor Bernie R. Burrus. outstanding scholastic achievement studying communication law.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix E: Scholarships 175

Sherman and Lucy Cohn Endowed Samuel Dash Endowed Scholarship Scholarship Fund: Established by Fund: To be used for law students with Professor Sherman L. Cohn, F’54, L’57, demonstrated financial need, with prefer- LL.M.’60, and his late wife, Lucy, to be ence for students who excel in professional awarded to law students with demonstrated responsibility, criminal law and procedure, financial need. or human rights law courses.

The Paul R. Connolly Memorial Schol- DeCrane Scholarship Fund: Established arship Fund: Established by colleagues by Mr. and Mrs. Alfred C. DeCrane, Jr., at the law firm of Williams & Connolly L’59. and friends of the late Paul R. Connolly, a Washington, D.C., attorney and alumnus, Donald E. deKieffer Endowed Schol- LL.B.’48, LL.M.’52. arship Fund: Established by Donald E. deKieffer, L’71, and his wife Nancy deKieffer Virginia Cooke Endowed Law Schol- to provide grant assistance to law students arship Fund: Established by Roger A. with demonstrated financial need, with pref- Cooke, C’70, L’73, in honor of his mother, erence for second and third year law students Virginia Cooke, to be awarded to law demonstrating high academic achievement students with demonstrated financial need. and interest in international trade law.

George D. Crowley, Jr. Endowed Delaney Family Endowed Scholar- Scholarship Fund: Established by George ship Fund: Established by April McClain- D. Crowley, Jr., C’73, L’76, to be used for Delaney, L’89, and John K. Delaney, L’88, law students with demonstrated financial to provide tuition assistance to students at need, with preference for students expressing the Law Center with demonstrated financial interest in careers in international entrepre- need. neurship. Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP Dean’s Scholars Michael J. and Karen M. Cuddy Fund: Established by the law firm of Dewey Scholarship Fund: Established by Michael & LeBoeuf LLP to be awarded with prefer- J. Cuddy, L’64, a distinguished alumnus, and ence to a first year law student who contrib- his wife, Karen. utes to the diverse economic, educational, and ethnic background of the Law Center’s William J. Curtin Scholarship in student body. Labor Relations: Established to honor the memory of William J. Curtin, C’53, L’56, Paul J. Diaz Scholarship Fund: Estab- LL.M.’57, by his friends and colleagues in lished by Paul J. Diaz, L’88, to be awarded the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius to law students with demonstrated financial LLP. This scholarship is awarded to a third need, with preference for law students who year student who has demonstrated merit contribute to the diverse economic, educa- and a strong interest in labor relations and tional, and ethnic background of the Law employee benefits law. Center’s student body.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 176 Appendix E: Scholarships

Murray Lindsley Dondy and David L. Louis B. Fine Scholarship Fund: Estab- Dondy Scholarship Fund: Established by lished by the family of Louis B. Fine, L’25, Virginia Dondy Green, L’71, in honor of her H’68, former President of the Georgetown parents, Murray Lindsley Dondy and David University Alumni Association and generous L. Dondy. benefactor to the University, to support a student at Georgetown University Law Donnelly Law Scholarship: Established Center who demonstrates tenacity, aggres- by the estate of Mary D. Meehan in memory siveness, and dedication to the law. of her father, Lt. Col. Richard John Donnelly, U.S.A., to assist graduates of St. John’s James T. Finlen Scholarship Fund: Military Academy in Washington, D.C. Established by Jim Finlen, L’28, for the purpose of maintaining and educating Nancy Reisinger Donovan Memorial students with demonstrated financial need in Fund: Established in memory of the late the law school. Nancy Jean Donovan by her husband, Daniel J. Donovan, L’68, family, and friends; Thomas B. Flynn Endowed Scholar- partially funded by matching grants from the ship Fund: Established by the estate of Kraft General Foods Corporation. Anne L. Kuritzky in memory of her husband, Thomas B. Flynn. Robert A. Dufek Opportunity Schol- arship Fund: Current-use scholarship fund Leo T. Franz Family Scholarship: Estab- established by Robert A. Dufek, L’76, to lished by Jack M. Franz, L’41, in memory of be used to ensure an economically diverse his father, Leo T. Franz, to provide tuition student body. assistance to students at the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. Bryan and Eleanor Farrell Scholar- ship: Established in 1990 in memory of Jean Shirley Frohlicher Scholarship Bryan, L’31, and Eleanor Farrell for the Fund: Established in memory of Jean benefit of law students who have demon- Shirley Frohlicher, L’66, by her husband, strated financial need. John Frohlicher, L’66, family, and friends, to be awarded with preference to an evening Federal Employees Law Scholarship student with demonstrated need. Fund: Established by Joseph E. Reece, L’89, to provide tuition assistance to J.D. or LL.M. Morris M. Geifman Scholarship Fund: students who have been, currently are, or Established by Stephen L. Geifman, L’69, expect to be employees of the federal govern- and Terri Geifman in honor of his father, ment. Morris M. Geifman, to provide tuition assistance to students at the Law Center with The April and Rachel Fegyveresi demonstrated financial need. Scholarship: Established by Tom Fegyveresi, F’66, in honor of his daughters, Law Alumni of Georgia Scholarship April, C’92, L’96, and Rachel, B’90, N’95. Fund: Established by Law Center alumni/ ae in Georgia to assist J.D. students with demonstrated financial need, with preference to students from Georgia.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix E: Scholarships 177

The Ralph J. Gilbert/Philip A. Ryan The John B. Hayward Scholarship: Memorial Scholarship: Established by Established by the IBM Corporation in Ralph Gilbert, L’57, a retired partner from honor of the late John B. Hayward in recog- Baker & McKenzie in Chicago to honor nition of his 50 years of distinguished service the memory of Philip A. Ryan, his teacher, and his contribution to the patent policies of partner, and friend. the Corporation.

Dr. John and Ruth Gillick Scholarship Edwin A. and Florence M. Heafey Fund: Established by John E. Gillick, Jr., Endowment Fund: Established by the late L’70, and his wife, Patricia, to be awarded Edwin A. Heafey, LL.B.’23, LL.D.’68, an to law students with demonstrated financial attorney from California. need. Jerome H. Heckman Scholarship Gillis-Pollock Scholarship Fund: Fund: Established by Jerome H. Heckman, Established by Theresa M. Gillis, L’74, a C’48, L’53, to be awarded with preference to distinguished and loyal alumna, in honor of a J.D. student studying Food and Drug Law. her father and mother. John J. and Yvonne J. Held Scholar- Thomas M. Haderlein Scholarship ship Fund: Established by John J. Held, Fund: Established in honor of Thomas M. L’64, a distinguished alumnus, and his wife, Haderlein, L’60, LL.M.’62, by his colleagues Yvonne, to be awarded with preference to at the law firm of Baker & McKenzie. a third year law student with demonstrated financial need who is interested in pursuing a The Harnisch Family Scholarship: career in public interest law. Established by William O.C. Harnisch, L’65, and his family to be awarded to law students James F. Henriot Endowed Schol- with demonstrated financial need. arship Fund: Established by James F. Henriot, L’54, LL.M.’61, to be awarded to John F. and Laurie K. Hartigan law students with demonstrated financial Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established need. by Laurie K. and John F. Hartigan, L’75, to be awarded to law students with demon- Thomas V. and Mary B. Heyman strated financial need, with preference to Scholarship: Established by Thomas V. students who show an interest in securities Heyman, L’62, a distinguished and loyal law. alumnus, and his wife, Mary.

E. Kirby and Elizabeth Hayes Scholar- Sister Mary K. Himens, S.S.C.M., ship Fund: Established by John Clarke and Father James B. Malley, S.J., Kane and John Clarke Kane, Jr., L’71, to be Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established awarded to J.D. students who demonstrate by Linda J. Morgan, L’79, and Michael financial need, with preference to students E. Karam, F’72, L’76, L’81, in honor of from Eastern Massachusetts. former Law Center chaplains, Sister Mary K. Himens, S.S.C.M., and Father James B. Malley, S.J., to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 178 Appendix E: Scholarships

Joe G. Hollingsworth Scholarship Jankowsky Family Endowed Scholar- Fund: Established by Joe G. Hollingsworth, ship Fund: Established by the Jankowsky L’74, to be awarded to law students with Family, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. demonstrated financial need, with preference Benjamin and Lillian Holstein Memorial given to students who aspire to be actively Scholarship: Established by the Benjamin, involved with their communities and/or their L’36, and Lillian Holstein Estate. nation.

Joseph A. Hoskins Scholarship Fund: Robert W. Johnson Opportunity Established by the family and colleagues Scholarship Fund: Current-use scholar- of the late Joseph A. Hoskins, LL.B.’37, ship fund established by Robert W. Johnson, LL.M.’39, a Kansas City, Missouri attorney. L’87, to promote economic diversity within the Law Center student body. Adolph Charles Hugin Scholarship Endowment Fund: Established by a Todd W. Johnson Scholarship Fund: bequest from Dr. Adolph Charles Hugin, Established by the late Todd W. Johnson, L’34, to be awarded to law students with LL.B.’19, an attorney from California. demonstrated financial need. Edmund L. Jones Memorial Scholar- Keith and Celeste Hummel Scholar- ship: Established by the firm of Hogan & ship: Established by Keith R. Hummel, Hartson in memory of the late Edmund L. L’90, and Celeste Hummel to provide tuition Jones, L.L.B.’16, a senior partner in the DC assistance to students at the Law Center with office, with preference for a Georgetown demonstrated financial need. University undergraduate who participated in collegiate sports. Hunton & Williams Scholarship: Established by the law firm of Hunton & Mercedes C. José Memorial Scholar- Williams. ship Fund: Established by Aurora José Wong, L’77, in memory of her sister, to The C. Keefe Hurley Scholarship: assist one or more deserving J.D. students, Established by C. Keefe Hurley, a Boston with preference to Asian Pacific American attorney and alumnus, LL.B.’34, J.D.’35. students from Hawaii or Guam, in order to support the goal of a diverse Law Center Linda Hyatt Lauve Scholarship: community. Established by her mother, Grace Hyatt, in memory of Linda Hyatt Lauve, a member of Amy Weiss and Peter J. Kadzik the Class of 1989, whose untimely death in Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established her third year was a great loss to her family, by Peter J. Kadzik, L’77, and Amy Weiss, her children, and the legal profession. Hyatt to be awarded to law students with demon- Lauve scholars will be chosen on the basis strated financial need. of need, and will be students who exemplify Linda’s commitment to using her talents to serve the needs of others.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix E: Scholarships 179

Henry Kaiser Memorial Lecture and Brent Leahey Scholarship in Law: Scholarship Fund: Established by the Established by Mary Jo Leahey in memory of family and friends of the late Henry Kaiser, her grandson, Brent Leahey, C’88, L’92. to honor his contributions to labor law and the betterment of working people. The schol- Robert D. L’Heureux Memorial Schol- arship will be awarded to an outstanding law arship Fund: Established by the National student studying labor relations. Cable Television Association and friends of the late Robert D. L’Heureux, LL.B.’40, Charles A. Keigwin Scholarship: LL.M.’42, an attorney with the Federal Established by the Josephine Kratzer Carvill Communications Commission. Trust in memory of Charles A. Keigwin, a distinguished professor at the Law School for Sanford M. Litvack Endowed Scholar- more than 20 years, whose teaching greatly ship Fund: Established by Sanford M. influenced the legal career of Richard Carvill, Litvack, L’59, to provide tuition assistance LL.B.’27. to students at the Law Center with demon- strated financial need. The Joseph E. and Mary E. Keller Foundation Scholarship: Established by Dow Lohnes Diversity Scholarship: the Joseph E. and Mary E. Keller Foundation Established by the law firm of Dow Lohnes of Dayton, Ohio, to assist deserving students. PLLC, to be awarded to a rising second year J.D. student with demonstrated finan- William C. Keller and Dorothy D. cial need who contributes to the diverse Keller Scholarship Fund: Established by economic and ethnic composition of the legal William C. Keller, L’52, to provide scholar- profession and who has achieved academic ships to deserving students in the George- excellence. town University Law Center Juris Doctor program. Ralph B. Long Memorial Scholarship: Established in memory of Ralph B. Long, John J. Kirby Scholarship Fund: Estab- L’67, by his friends, family, and former lished by Peter M. Kirby, L’79, and John J. colleagues in the firm of Metzger, Shadyac & Kirby, Jr., in honor of their father, John J. Schwarz. Kirby, Sr., L’35. Charles Lucey Scholarship: Established Victor P. Klein Endowed Scholarship by Charles Emmet Lucey, C’56, L’59, in Fund: Established by Lee I. Miller, B’69, honor of his father. L’72, to be used for students with demon- strated financial need. MacRae Law Scholarship Fund: Estab- lished by Alexander K. MacRae, L’15, L’16, The John F. Lanigan Scholarship: to be awarded to law students with demon- Established by the late John F. Lanigan, strated financial need. LL.B.’22. McLean Family Endowed Scholarship Robert S. Lavet Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by the R. Bruce McLean Fund: Established by Robert S. Lavet, L’79, family, to be awarded to law students with to be awarded to law students with demon- demonstrated financial need. strated financial need.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 180 Appendix E: Scholarships

Gregory J. Maier Scholarship in Stanley and Mavis Metzger Endowed Patent Law Fund: Established by Gregory Scholarship Fund: Established by Stanley J. Maier, L’69, a distinguished and loyal and Mavis Metzger to provide financial alumnus, to be awarded to law students with assistance to students of Georgetown Univer- demonstrated financial need, with preference sity Law Center who are members of under- given to students interested in practicing represented groups in the legal profession. patent law who have earned undergraduate degrees in one of the technical subjects Alvin R. Miller Endowed Scholarship: recognized by the United States Patent and Established by Lee I. Miller, B’69, L’72, in Trade Mark Office. honor of his father, Alvin R. Miller, to be used for law students with demonstrated Tim and Marcia McBride Endowed financial need. Scholarship Fund: Established by Timothy B. McBride, L’75, L’80, and his Miller & Chevalier Charitable Foun- wife, Marcia, to provide assistance to a dation Scholarship: Established by the student demonstrating financial need and a Miller & Chevalier Charitable Foundation to strong interest in tax law. assist students demonstrating financial need.

Eugene P. McCahill Scholarship Fund: Thomas and Helen Moloney Established by James, L’60,and Catherine Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established Denny through the James and Catherine by a bequest from Thomas Moloney, C’28, Denny Foundation. L’31, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. William E. McDaniels Opportunity Scholarship: Current-use scholarship fund The Moran Family Endowed Scholar- established by William E. McDaniels, L’66, ship in Law: Established by Edmond J., to promote economic diversity within the B’67, and Judy Moran, N’68, to provide Law Center student body. support to law students demonstrating financial need, with preference for students Margaret H. and Alexander B. interested in careers in legal services. McMurtrie, Jr. Scholarship Fund: Established by Margaret H. and Alexander Patrick J. Moran Endowed Scholar- B. McMurtrie, Jr., L’61, to be awarded to ship Fund: Established by Patrick J. Moran law students with demonstrated financial L’73, to be used for law students with need, with preference for students who are demonstrated financial need. graduates of the University of Notre Dame (Indiana). Edward P. and Joan N. Morgan Endowed Scholarship: Established by Gilbert G. Menna and Janet L. Linda J. Morgan, L’76, and her husband, Remien Endowed Scholarship Fund: Michael E. Karam, F’72, L’76, L’82, in Established by Gilbert G. Menna, L’82, L’83, memory of her father, Edward P. Morgan, and Janet L. Remien, L’82, to be awarded and mother, Joan N. Morgan. to law students with demonstrated financial need. John P. Murphy Scholarship: Estab- lished by the bequest of John P. Murphy Estate to be used for anyone with the valid surname of Murphy.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix E: Scholarships 181

The Rita C. Murray Memorial Scholar- The Paige Family Scholarship Fund: ship Fund: Established by Dennis I. Meyer, Established by Stephen B. Paige, L’72, L’60, LL.M.’62, in memory of his mother-in- a distinguished alumnus, and his wife, law. Deborah, to be awarded with preference to an outstanding law student residing in Marcia R. Nirenstein Opportunity Brooklyn, New York, who has demonstrated Scholarship: Current-use scholarship fund financial need. established by Marcia R. Nirenstein, L’80, to promote economic diversity within the Law Robert L. Parks Opportunity Scholar- Center student body. ship: Current-use scholarship fund estab- lished by Robert L. Parks, L’63, to promote Carl W. Northrop Endowed Schol- economic diversity within the Law Center arship Fund: Established by Carl W. student body. Northrop, L’76, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Richard J. and Barbara A. Phelan Scholarship Fund: Established by Richard Martin J. O’Brien Law Scholarship J. Phelan, L’61, and Barbara A. Phelan to be Fund: Established by The Honorable awarded to students at the Law Center with Martin J. O’Brien, C’52, L’55, to be awarded demonstrated financial need. to law students with demonstrated financial need. The Daniel J. Piliero II Memorial Scholarship Fund: Established in memory Timothy J. and Linda D. O’Neill Schol- of Daniel J. Piliero II, a Washington, D.C., arship Fund: Established by Timothy J. attorney, committed parent, and dear friend O’Neill, L’77, and his wife, Linda D. O’Neill, to Georgetown University, by his wife, Joyce, N’77, distinguished and loyal alumni. children, relatives, friends, and colleagues.

Orrick Law Center Scholars: Current- Law Prefects Scholarship Fund: Estab- use scholarship fund established by the law lished in 1999 by Law Center alumni who firm, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP to served as Prefects in undergraduate residence promote diversity in the legal profession. halls on Georgetown’s main campus while attending the Law Center, in recognition of Maureen F. O’Shaughnessy Endowed the assistance they received from the Univer- Scholarship Fund: Established by Louis sity in the form of room and board. This J. Briskman, L’73, in memory of his wife, scholarship is to provide financial support Maureen F. O’Shaughnessy, to be awarded to current Law Center students with demon- with preference to a woman with demon- strated need. strated financial need who most closely matches the experience, attributes, and A. Kenneth Pye Scholarship Fund: qualities of Maureen F. O’Shaughnessy’s Established by Richard A. Hibey, L’65, multi-dimensional life. LL.M.’66, in memory of former Law Center Associate Dean and Professor A. Kenneth Pye, LL.B.’53, LL.M.’55, LL.D.’78, to assist J.D. students with demonstrated need.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 182 Appendix E: Scholarships

Linda C. Quinn Memorial Scholar- Rothschild Family Scholarship Fund: ship: Established to honor the memory of Established by a bequest from Steve J. Roth- Linda C. Quinn, L’72, by her family, friends, schild, L’68, to be awarded to law students classmates, colleagues and the law firm of with demonstrated financial need. Shearman & Sterling LLP, where Linda was a partner. This scholarship is awarded to a Robert and Elizabeth Ruyak third year student who has demonstrated Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established merit and a strong interest in securities or by Robert F. Ruyak, L’74, to be used for corporate law. scholarships for law students with demon- strated financial need. Milton M. Ratner Scholarship Fund: Established by a grant from the Milton M. Sidney Sachs Memorial Fund: Estab- Ratner Foundation. lished in memory of Sidney S. Sachs, L’41, by his family and friends to provide tuition The Honorable John N. Reynolds assistance to students at the Law Center with Endowed Fund: Established by Nancy demonstrated financial need. Doerr O’Neil, L’82, and Thomas F. O’Neil III, L’82, distinguished and loyal alumni, in Sallie Mae Scholarship Fund: Estab- honor of Judge John N. Reynolds, L’50. lished by Marianne M. Keler, F’76, L’80, and Michael R. Kershow, L’80, distinguished and Harry Sansbury Ridgely Scholarship loyal alumni. Fund: Established by the estate of Helen Ridgely Kennedy in honor of her father, The Daniel J. Sammon Scholarship Harry Sansbury Ridgely, LL.B. 1896, LL.M. Fund: Established in memory of her 1897, to be awarded to law students with husband, Daniel Sammon, L’60, by Juanita demonstrated financial need. Sammon.

Marvin and Joan Rosenberg Scholar- Morris A. Schapiro Scholarship Fund: ship Fund: Established by Marvin Rosen- Established by the M. A. Schapiro Fund. berg, L’61, LL.M.’67, and Joan Rosenberg to assist J.D. students with demonstrated need. Thomas F. Schlafly Scholarship Fund: Established by Thomas F. Schlafly, C’70, Louis and Anne Rosoff Scholarship: L’77, a distinguished alumnus, to be awarded Established by the estate of Louis Rosoff, to law students with demonstrated financial L’23, to assist students of high academic need. standing who have demonstrated financial need, with preference to students from The Leo Schlosberg Scholarship: Connecticut. Established in memory of Leo Schlosberg, LL.B.’24, by his family and son, Hank M. Tom and Joan Rothman Endowed Schlosberg, L’56. Scholarship Fund: Established by Thomas M. Rothman, L’68, and his wife, Joan, to John F. Schrankel Scholarship Fund: provide assistance to Native American law Established by a bequest from John F. students who demonstrate financial need. Schrankel, LL.M.’59.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix E: Scholarships 183

The Schuyler Scholarship: Established C.V. Starr Scholarship Fund: Established by Jean H. and William E. Schuyler, Jr., L’40, by the Starr Foundation in honor of its a distinguished patent attorney. founder, the late C.V. Starr.

Donald E. Schwartz Memorial Schol- Toni Stabile Endowed Scholarship arship Fund: Established in memory of Fund: Established by the Vincent A. Stabile the late Georgetown University Law Center Foundation to be awarded to students with professor Donald E. Schwartz, by his family demonstrated financial need, with prefer- and friends, in recognition of his contribu- ence for students pursuing careers in public tions to the development of corporate and interest law. securities law and to legal education. Thomas Allan Steele, Jr. Endowed Ivan Shandor Memorial Ukrainian Scholarship Fund: Established by Sara- American Bar Association Endowed belle Blackwell Steele, in memory of her Scholarship Fund: Established by Lidia husband, Thomas Allan Steele, Jr., L’41, to Shandor in memory of her husband, Ivan be awarded to law students with demon- Shandor, L’73, to be awarded with preference strated financial need. to law students enrolled in the Master of Laws degree program who are residents of, Howard E. Steinberg Scholarship: or who have resided in, Ukraine. Established by Howard Steinberg, L’69, a distinguished and loyal alumnus. The William A. and May Nora Shea Memorial Scholarship Fund: Estab- William Carroll Stephenson, Mary lished in memory of William A. Shea, C’30, Finley Stephenson, and Dennis Finley L’31, LL.D.’71, and May Nora Shea, by the Stephenson Memorial Scholarship: law firm of Shea & Gould, their colleagues, Established by Andrew W. Stephenson, L’76, friends, and family. to be awarded to a student with demon- strated financial need with preference for a Silver Family Endowed Scholarship law student with either a Native-American Fund: Established by Peggy Silver, Sidney J. background or who is an alumnus/a of Boys Silver, L’62, and David C. Silver, L’88, to be Town of America. awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Jan A. Stransky Memorial Scholar- ship: Established by the family and friends Jonathan Sobeloff Memorial Scholar- of Jan A. Stransky, a member of the class of ship Fund: Established by Mr. and Mrs. 1989 who died in his first year of law school. Isidore Sobeloff and family in memory of Reflecting Jan’s spirit of commitment to the late Georgetown University Law Center public and community service, the Stransky professor Jonathan Sobeloff, who taught at Scholarship is awarded to students partici- the Law Center from 1966 to 1979. pating in the Public Interest Law Scholars Program. Elizabeth Hunter Solomon Scholar- ship: Established by Elizabeth Hunter Solomon to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 184 Appendix E: Scholarships

Students of Hawaii Scholarship Fund: Medina and John Vasily Opportunity Established to assist law students from Scholarship: Current-use scholarship fund Hawaii who have demonstrated financial established by John M. Vasily, L’82, and his need. The scholarship awards from this fund wife, Medina, L’83, to promote economic are generated from the proceeds of the Bert diversity within the Law Center student and Susan Kobayashi Georgetown University body. Golf Tournament held in Hawaii and gifts from loyal alumni/ae in Hawaii. William T. Vukowich Endowed Schol- arship Fund: Established by Georgetown John F. and Noreen C. Sweeney University Law Center Professor William T. Vukowich to be awarded to students with Scholarship: Established by Noreen C. demonstrated financial need, with a prefer- Sweeney and John F. Sweeney, L’73, to be ence for students who display an interest in awarded to students with demonstrated consumer, commercial or related law. need, with preference to outstanding students from Washington, D.C. James L. Waite Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Donald L. Waite, L’59, Law Alumni of Texas Scholarship and Anna T. Waite in memory and honor of Fund: Established by Law Center alumni Donald’s brother, James L. Waite, L’58. in Texas to assist J.D. students with demon- strated financial need, with preference to Bertha Eulalie Wilmot Scholarship: students from Texas. Established by David W. Wilmot, L’73, a distinguished and loyal alumnus, in honor The Martin S. Thaler Memorial Schol- of his mother, Bertha Eulalie Wilmot, to be arship in Law and Philosophy: Estab- awarded with preference to African-Amer- lished by the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & ican students with demonstrated need. Manges to assist a student pursuing a joint degree in law and philosophy who demon- Winston & Strawn Scholarship Fund: strates financial need. Established by the law firm of Winston & Strawn LLP to be awarded with preference Henry H. and Ernestine L. and Leslie to a first year J.D. student with demonstrated Thomasina Thornton Endowed financial need who contributes to the diverse Scholarship Fund: Established by Leslie economic, educational, and ethnic back- T. Thornton, L’83, in honor of her parents, ground of the Law Center’s student body and to be awarded with preference to African- who has expressed a desire to pursue a career in private law firm practice. American J.D. students with demonstrated financial need. Women in Law as a Second Career Scholarship Fund: Established by John E. Tomas Endowed Scholarship distinguished Law Center alumnae to assist Fund: Established by a bequest from the women entering the legal profession as a late John E. Tomas, L’63, to be used for second career. scholarships for students with demonstrated financial need. Raymund T. Yingling Scholarship Fund: Established by the estate of Raymund T. Yingling, L’21, to assist students of high academic standing who have demonstrated financial need, with preference for Catholic students.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix F: Loans 185

APPENDIX F: LOANS

Harry C. Cox Loan: Established by the Edward M. Ricci and the Honorable Estate of Irma C. Cox in memory of her Mary E. Lupo Loan Fund: Established husband, Harry C. Cox, L’12. by Edward M. Ricci, L’73, and the Honor- able Mary E. Lupo, L’74, to support those The Paul Dean Loan Fund: Established students dedicated to serving the public by an anonymous donor in honor of Paul interest. Dean, LL.B.’46, LL.M.’52, LL.D.’69, Dean of the Law Center from 1954 to 1969, and Abe Plough Law Student Loan Fund: Professor of Law. Established by a grant from the Plough Foundation. The Dean’s Loan Fund (The Law Center Loan Fund II): Established by an Philip A. Ryan Memorial Loan: Estab- alumnus and benefactor as a supplement to lished by the partners of the law firm of The Law Center Loan Fund. Baker & McKenzie in memory of Philip A. Ryan, a partner with the firm and professor Bryan Farrell Student Loan: Established of law at Georgetown from 1949 to 1966. by Mrs. Eleanor Farrell in memory of her husband, Bryan Farrell, L’31. William and Rebecca Sachs Loan: Established by Sidney S. Sachs, L’41, in The George Arthur Ginsburg Student memory of his parents. Loan Fund: Established by Mattie L. Ginsburg in memory of her husband, George The Joseph E. and Madeline M. A. Ginsburg, L’24. Sheehy Student Loan Fund: Established by Mrs. Sheehy and the late Mr. Sheehy, Richard Alan Gordon Student Emer- LL.B.’24, an attorney and official with the gency Loan Fund: Established by Paul Federal Trade Commission and a member of A. Nussbaum, L’71, in honor of Professor the adjunct faculty of the Law Center from of Law, Richard Alan Gordon, B’50, L’53, 1959 to 1969. LL.M.’61, to provide emergency loans to Law Center students. The Davis and Maurine Weir Endow- ment Fund: Established by Davis and George Link, Jr. Loan: Established by the Maurine Weir to assist disadvantaged George Link, Jr. Foundation of New York. students.

Edward T. Mitchell Memorial Loans Program: Established by the law firm of Patton, Boggs & Blow in memory of the late Edward T. Mitchell, L’62, a former senior partner of the firm.

The Kuro Murase Loan Fund: Estab- lished by Jiro Murase, L’58, in memory of his father and by Saturo Murase, L’83, in memory of his grandfather.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 186

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 187

APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS

ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in who earns the highest grade in any bank- Health Care Law: This award is presented ruptcy class at any accredited United States annually to up to three graduating students law school. with the highest grade point average in a basic health law course or who are otherwise American Bar Association Section of regarded as outstanding in these fields. Urban, State, and Local Government Law Certificate of Recognition: This ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in award is designated to the top student of Intellectual Property Law: This award is each section of Land Use and Local Govern- presented annually to up to three graduating ment Law. Each student will receive from students with the highest grade point average the American Bar Association a personalized in a basic intellectual property law course or award certificate in recognition of their who are otherwise regarded as outstanding academic achievement. in these fields. The Baker & McKenzie Law Student ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in Assistance Program: Established by the Labor and Employment Law: This law firm of Baker & McKenzie to assist first award is presented annually to up to three year minority students. graduating students with the highest grade point average in a basic labor and/or employ- The Beaudry Cup: The Beaudry Cup ment law course or who are otherwise appellate advocacy competition was estab- regarded as outstanding in these fields. lished in 1952 to honor the best advocates of the first year class. It is named in honor of ALI/ABA Scholarship and Leadership Robert J. Beaudry, who distinguished himself Award: This award is presented to the by virtue of his outstanding enthusiasm, graduating student who best represents a scholarship and ability in oral argument, and combination of leadership and scholarship. who was killed in a tragic accident in the This award consists of a one-year subscrip- Spring of his first year. Each year, the name tion to a variety of ALI-ABA articles and of the winner of the Competition is inscribed materials, free tuition to a professional skills on the Beaudry Cup, on permanent display course, and a copy of Red Flags: A Lawyer’s in the trophy case outside the Philip A. Hart Handbook on Legal Ethics. Auditorium.

American Bankruptcy Institute Medal The Nathan Burkan Memorial of Excellence: A medal, certificate, and Competition: This competition was one-year membership in the American established by the American Society of Bankruptcy Institute is awarded annually Composers, Authors and Publishers in to the graduating student who has achieved memory of Nathan Burkan. A monetary academic excellence in the area of bank- award is made each year to the student ruptcy law. submitting the best thesis, in the judgment of the dean, on an assigned subject in the field American Bankruptcy Law Journal of copyright law. The second place award is Student Prize: The American Bankruptcy also a monetary award. Law Journal will award a free one-year subscription to the Journal to the student

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 188 Appendix G: Prizes and Awards

CALI Excellence for the Future The Jeffrey Crandall Award: A prize Award: CALI, the Center for Computer- of $100 will be awarded annually to the Assisted Legal Instruction, presents an award third year student who best exemplifies the to the student in each law school course ideals and commitment of the late Jeffrey achieving the top grade in the course. The Crandall, whose involvement in Legal Aid award is a certificate suitable for framing. and personal dedication to his fellow man CALI is a consortium of the nation’s law inspired the establishment of the fund in his schools which provides research and devel- name. opment and a distribution network for computer-assisted instruction in the law. Its Dean’s Certificate: This honor is library of instructional materials contains presented to graduating students in recogni- over 90 lessons in 21 areas of the law. CALI’s tion of special and outstanding service to the commitment to innovation and achievement Law Center community. in teaching and learning in the law schools prompted it to sponsor this awards program. Kathleen Stowe Dixon Visiting Student Prize: A prize of $100 is awarded Thomas Bradbury Chetwood, S.J. annually to the visiting student earning the Prize: Founded by the Law Center Class highest grade point average during his or her of 1928, these prizes are given in honor year at Georgetown University Law Center. of Reverend Thomas B. Chetwood, S.J., a The prize was created by a former visiting former Regent of the Law Center. Plaques student in honor of his mother. are awarded to the students who both graduate with distinction and have the best The Dean Hugh J. Fegan Memorial academic records for that academic year Prize: A prize of $100 is awarded annually in the following LL.M. degree programs: to the student in the Day Division with the Global Health Law, International and best overall academic record at the conclu- Business Economic Law, International Legal sion of the first year. The award is given Studies, Securities and Financial Regulation, in memory of Dean Fegan, who devoted and Taxation. At the discretion of the Asso- nearly half a century to the Law School. His ciate Dean for Graduate Programs, a prize guiding presence from 1911 to 1943 greatly may be awarded for the most outstanding enhanced Georgetown’s development during work in an approved individualized Master these critical years. of Laws program and for an international student in a general studies Master of Laws Michael Feldman Advocacy Award: program. This is an award given by vote of the students in the Criminal Justice Clinic to the Joyce Chiang Memorial Award: Estab- outstanding advocate in the clinic. lished in memory of Joyce Chiang, L’95, by her classmates, friends, and colleagues, to Georgetown Law Journal Meritorious be awarded to an evening student with a Service Award: The Editor in Chief demonstrable commitment to public service. recognizes up to four graduating Journal members whose hard work and spirit as non- Senior board members made an outstanding contribution to the Journal. Winners receive a bound and embossed copy of their year’s Volume.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 189

The Georgetown Club of Metropol- Deborah K. Hauger Memorial Fellow- itan Washington, D.C.: A gift is awarded ship Fund: Established by the family, annually to the graduating J.D. student from friends and colleagues of “Deb” Hauger, the Metropolitan Washington, D.C., area L’88, this fund is a tribute to her life, inter- with the best overall academic performance. ests and dedication to the ideals she worked so hard to achieve. Each year, a recent Alan J. Goldstein Memorial Award: graduate is selected as a Deborah K. Hauger An annual cash award to the Criminal Fellow and is awarded a stipend to facilitate Justice Clinic student who best demonstrates the study of issues in international affairs, the qualities Alan J. Goldstein tried to specifically in the realm of peacekeeping in instill in his students: the use of intelligence, developing nations. creativity, and resourcefulness in defending criminal clients and a dedication to criminal Kirby S. Howlett III Memorial Award: law, fair play, and justice. Established by the family and friends of Kirby S. Howlett III, adjunct professor to Greenfield Trial Practice Award: the Criminal Justice Clinic, to honor his Substantial monetary awards to help defray professional accomplishments. A grant is the cost of student loans are given to several awarded annually to a recent graduate who students in the Criminal Justice Clinic who has participated in the Criminal or Juvenile have accepted jobs as prosecutors and as Justice Clinics, accrued student loans public defenders. while attending the Law Center and upon graduation accepts employment at a public The Nelson T. Hartson Memorial defenders office. Award: This annual scholarship award is made to a graduating Georgetown University The International Academy of Trial Law Center student in the Juris Doctor Lawyers’ Award: Each year a plaque is program on the basis of scholastic achieve- awarded to trial clinic students excelling in ment, economic need, or a combination the art of advocacy. One graduating student of the two factors. The scholarship is used from each of the advocacy clinical programs for graduate study in a degree program is selected by the Dean upon the recom- permitting concentration of a majority of mendation of the faculty supervisors for the the graduate student’s hours in the field of clinics. The award is on permanent display tax law at any accredited institution selected outside the Moot Courtroom. In addition, by the recipient. The graduate study may be each winner receives a scroll suitable for undertaken on either a full time or part time framing. basis. The fund to support the Award was donated in 1977 by the law firm of Hogan The Juvenile Justice Clinic Public & Hartson as a memorial to its distinguished Service Award: This cash award, provided founding partner, Nelson T. Hartson, by the alumni of the Juvenile Justice Clinic to Esquire. Mr. Hartson served as the senior help defray the cost of student loans, is given partner of the firm for 47 years and was for a each year to a graduating clinic student who time an Adjunct Professor of Taxation at the has accepted a job providing service to the Law Center. community.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 190 Appendix G: Prizes and Awards

The Kappa Beta Pi Prize: A cash award The Francis E. Lucey, S.J. Award: The of $350 is made annually to the student graduating student who has earned the with the highest academic average upon the highest academic average for his or her law completion of the first year. school career will receive a plaque, awarded in honor of Rev. Francis E. Lucey, Regent of The Milton A. Kaufman Prize: A cash the Law School for 30 years. Father Lucey award and an accompanying plaque are guided the school during the difficult years of offered annually to the student who does the the Depression and World War II and lived best work for the year on the Georgetown to see Georgetown’s emergence as the impor- Law Journal. The late Milton A. Kaufman, tant national law school which it is today. of the District of Columbia Bar, graduated from the Law Center in the class of 1913. James John McTigue Essay Award: Each year the Dean selects a group of The Charles A. Keigwin Award: Each seminars eligible to compete for this award. year a plaque is awarded to the student in A certificate and a cash prize is made the Evening Division with the best overall annually to the author of the best seminar academic record at the conclusion of the paper for each designated seminar. first year. The prize honors the memory of Charles Keigwin, a distinguished professor at The George Brent Mickum III Prize: the Law School for over 20 years. The family, colleagues and friends of George Brent Mickum III, C’49, L’52, have estab- John F. Kennedy Labor Law Award: lished this prize to honor the memory of In memory of John F. Kennedy, President George Mickum, a former member of the of the United States, January 20, 1961 to firm of Steptoe and Johnson. The prize of November 22, 1963, a fund has been created $3,000 is awarded annually to the second by Jacob Kossman used to award an annual year full time or third year part time division cash award to the graduating senior who has student who achieved the best overall achieved the best overall performance in the academic record at the completion of all first field of Labor Law. An additional sum has year courses the prior Spring. The prize only been given by Mr. Kossman for the creation applies to first year courses. and annual award of a plaque to accompany the John F. Kennedy Labor Law Award. The Saint Thomas More Award: An award consisting of a framed certificate will The Leahy Moot Court Competition: be given to the top three graduating journal Each year, some of the best Moot Court members for their outstanding work on the advocates in the Law Center are honored in Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics and the Leahy Moot Court Competition, open their names will be added to a perpetual to all upperclass students. The Competition plaque in the Georgetown Journal of Legal is named in memory of William E. Leahy, Ethics office. a Law Center alumnus and an outstanding advocate. The name of the winner of the National Association of Women Competition is inscribed on the Leahy Lawyers’ Award: Presented to an Cup and on the Roll of Best Advocates on outstanding graduating student who has permanent display outside the Philip A. Hart achieved academic excellence and contributes Auditorium. to the advancement of women in society.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 191

Vincent G. Panati Memorial Award: The Washington Law Reporter From proceeds of a fund created by the Prize: Established by the Washington Law friends of the late Vincent G. Panati, Reporter Company, the Prize consists of a LL.B.’34, former first Assistant District one-year subscription to the Washington Attorney for Philadelphia and former Law Reporter. Awards are made annually Secretary of Revenue for the Common- to one student whose efforts during the wealth of Pennsylvania, a prize of $300 preceding six months have most contributed is awarded each year to the student in the to the success of the Student Bar Association. Day or Evening Division achieving the best Selection is made by the dean upon recom- combined scholastic record in the courses in mendation of the president of the Student Criminal Justice. Bar Association.

Bettina E. Pruckmayr Memorial Diane R. Wolf Fellowship in Honor of Award: An annual cash award is presented Erving and Joyce Wolf: Established by annually to the third year student who best the late Diane R. Wolf, L’95, in honor of her exemplifies a commitment to the ideals of the parents, Erving and Joyce Wolf, to provide late Bettina E. Pruckmayr, whose belief in support for fellowships awarded annually to human rights, and the obligation of everyone students from Hebrew University or other to ensure the protection of these rights, Israeli universities pursuing L.L.M degrees at inspired the establishment of this fund in her Georgetown University Law Center. name.

The Leon Robbin Patent Award: From proceeds of a fund created by Leon Robbin, LL.B.’22, a gold medallion will be awarded annually to the graduating student who has done the best work in the field of patent law at the Law Center.

The Sewall Key Prize: The Sewall Key Prize of $200 has been established by friends of the late Sewall Key, LL.B.’20, former Special Assistant to the Attorney General, Tax Division, Department of Justice. The prize is awarded annually to the graduating senior who does the best work in the field of taxation at the Law Center.

Tutorial Program Award: In recognition of the outstanding contributions made to the Law Center’s academic program.

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 192 Index

INDEX Certificate in International Academic Attrition, J.D. Program 26 Human Rights Law 66 Academic Evaluation and Certificate in National Security Law 66 Attrition Standards, J.D. Program 23 Certificate in World Trade Academic Honors, Graduate Programs 75 Organization (WTO) Studies 66 Academic Honors, J.D. Program 25 Certificate Program Requirements 64 Academic Requirements and Policies, Chaplains and Counselors 133 J.D. Program 18 Charles Fahy Distinguished Faculty Academic Resource Programs 128 Award Recipients 171 Adjunct Faculty, Graduate 159 Clinic Enrollment Policies 37 Administrative and Support Services 132 Clinics 135 Administrative Officers 131 Community Welfare 93 Administrative Policies, General 79 Computer Systems Acceptable Use Policy 111 Adjunct Faculty, J.D. 143 Consensual Sexual Relationships, Advanced Standing for Credit Earned Policy Statement 108 as a J.D. Student at Georgetown Law 70 Conduct Policies 91 Advanced Standing for Graduate Credits Conferral of the Degree, Graduate Programs 68 Earned as a Non-Degree Student Continuing Legal Education 133 at Georgetown Law 70 Credit for Courses in the Graduate Affirmative Action Grievance Procedures School of Georgetown University 69 to Investigate Discrimination 103 Credit for Courses in the Law Center Alumni, Development and Public Relations 132 Graduate Programs 32 Appellate Litigation Clinic 126 Credit for Courses in the Undergraduate Appendices 129 or Graduate Schools of the University 32 Application to Graduate 81 Credit for Study Outside the Law Center 33 Attendance and Evaluation Policies, Credits Earned at Other Institutions 69 Graduate Programs 72 Criminal Justice Clinic 135 Attendance and Participation, Curriculum 123 Graduate Programs 72 Curriculum, Graduate 127 Attendance and Participation, J.D. Program 28 Curriculum, J.D. 125 Attendance, Examinations and D.C. Street Law Project 136 Written Work, J.D. Program 28 Dean of Students, Office of 133 Policy for Audio-Recording of Classes 81 Dean’s List, J.D. Program 25 Bar Admissions, Examinations and Review 84 Deans & Vice Presidents 3; 139 Board of Directors 131 Deans Emeriti 138 Board of Visitors 139 Dean’s List, Graduate Programs 75 Business and Financial Affairs 132 Diplomas With Honors, J.D. Program 25 Career Services 133 Disability Services, Office of 133 Center for Applied Legal Studies 135 Discrimination Grievance Procedures Center for Law and the Public’s Health 136 Administered by Office of Career Services 101 Center for the Advancement of the Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) 57 Rule of Law in the Americas 137 Domestic Violence Clinic 135 Center for the Study of the Duplication of Courses, Graduate Programs 68 Legal Profession 137 Duplication of Courses, J.D. Program 36 Center for Transnational Enrollment and Credit Policies, Legal Studies 31 Graduate Programs 67 Center on National Security and the Law 137 Enrollment for Bar Purposes 67 Center on Poverty, Inequality and Ethics Counsel 133 Public Policy 137 Exam Deferral Policy 84 Certificate in Employee Benefits Law 65 Examinations, Graduate Programs 72 Certificate in Estate Planning 65 Examinations, J.D. Program 28 Executive Officers of the University 139

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Index 193

Externship Program, JD 35 J.D. Requirements 18 Faculty, Adjunct Graduate 159 J.D./LL.M. in Taxation, Joint Degree 53 Faculty, Adjunct J.D. 143 J.D./Master of Arts in Arab Studies 47 Faculty, Full-Time 4 Fahy Award Recipients 171 J.D./Master of Arts in German and Federal Legislation and European Studies 49 Administrative Clinic 135 J.D./Master of Arts in Latin Fees, Other 118 American Studies 50 Financial Aid 133 J.D./Master of Arts in Russian and First Year Continuing Orientation 128 Eastern European Studies 48 First Year J.D. Program of Study 125 J.D./Master of Arts in Security Studies 50 First Year Tutorial Program 128 J.D./Master of Business Administration 45 Full-Time and Part-Time Enrollment J.D./Master of Public Health 52 Defined, Graduate Programs 68 J.D./Master of Public Policy 53 Full-Time Faculty 4 J.D./Master of Science in Foreign Service 46 General Administrative Policies 79 J.D./Ph.D. in Government 51 Georgetown Environmental Law and J.D./Ph.D. in Philosophy 52 Policy Program 137 Joint Degrees 33 Georgetown Law - Asia 137 Joint J.D./LL.M. in Taxation, Georgetown Law Semester Abroad Program 31 Degree Requirements 63 Grade Change Policy, Graduate Programs 74 Juvenile Justice Clinic 136 Grading System, J.D. Program 23 Law Curriculum 123 Grading, Graduate Programs 74 Law Students in Court Clinic 136 Graduate Adjunct Faculty 159 Leaves of Absence, J.D. Program 36 Graduate Curriculum 127 Leaves of Absence, Graduate Programs 77 Graduate Independent Research 70 Library Staff 134 Graduate Program 55 Limitations on Credits Per Semester 68 Graduate Programs, Office of 133 LL.M. (Individualized Program) 59 Graduating With Distinction, LL.M. Degree and Program Requirements 59 Graduate Programs 75 LL.M. Degree Requirements for Graduation Honors Policy for Foreign-Educated Attorneys 61 Transfer/Visitor Students 26 LL.M. Degree Requirements for Harrassment, Policy on 106 U.S.-Educated J.D. Graduates 59 Harrison Institute for Housing and LL.M. Externship Program 72 Community Development 136 LL.M. in Advocacy 58 Harrison Institute for Public Law 136 LL.M. in Global Health Law 59 Health Insurance 86 LL.M. in Securities and Human Rights Institute 137 Financial Regulation 60 I.D. Cards 87 LL.M. in Taxation 63 Independent Research, Graduate 70 LL.M. Students, General Requirements 59 Institute for Public Representation 136 Loans 185 Institute for the Study of Master of Studies in Law (M.S.L.) 67 International Migration 137 MyAccess 87 Institute of International Economic Law 137 Non-Degree Enrollment 78 Institutes and other Scholarly Programs 136 Non-Immigrant Visas, Requirements 23, 57, 76 International Women’s Human Office of Graduate Programs 132, 133 Rights Clinic 136 Office of Public Interest & J.D. Academic Services 134 Community Service 131, 132, 134 J.D. Adjunct Faculty 143 Office of Residence Life and Student Life 133 J.D. Full-Time Program 17 Office of the Registrar 134 J.D. Part-Time Program 17 One Paper for 2 Seminars, Graduate Programs 71 J.D. Program 15 One Paper for 2 Seminars, J.D. Program 20

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 194 Index

O’Neill Institute for National and Students Auditing Courses, J.D. Program 23 Global Health Law 137 Students Auditing Courses, Order of the Coif, Georgetown Chapter 26 Graduate Programs 76 Other Fees 118 Summer Abroad Programs at Other Provisions, Graduate Programs 75 Other Law Schools 34 Pass/Fail Option, Graduate Programs 75 Summer Session Attendance 27 Pass/Fail Option, J.D. Program 24, 31 Supervised Research 19, 20 Payment Plans 119 Supreme Court Institute 138 Plagiarism 98 The Crime Awareness and Campus Prizes and Awards 187 Security Act of 1990 84 Probation, Graduate Programs 74 Thomas Bradbury Chetwood, S.J., Prizes 188 Professional Responsibility, Three-Credit Seminars, Graduate Programs 71 Graduate Programs 78 Transcripts 89 Professional Responsibility, J.D. Program 17 Transfer Between Full- and Part-Time Professors Emeriti 138 Programs, J.D. Program 22 Program of Study, J.D. First Year 125 Transfer Between Full- and Part-Time Program of Study, J.D. Upperclass 125 Status, Graduate Programs 68 Program on International Business and Transfer Between LL.M. Degree Programs 64 Economic Law 137 Transnational Programs, Office of 134 Public Interest & Community Tuition and Fees 117 Service, Office of 131, 132, 134 Tuition & Fee Administrative Regulations 118 Public Interest Law Scholars Program 138 Tuition Deferments 118, 119 Ranking of Students, Graduate Programs 75 Tuition Insurance 120 Registrar, Office of 134 Tuition Refund Schedule 120 Registration for Courses 87 Tuition Refund Schedule, Required First-Year Program, J.D. 19, 125 Withdrawal Adjustments 120 Required Time in Residence: Tuition, Graduate Programs 58, 76 Full-Time Program 21 Tuition, J.D. Program 117 Required Time in Residence: Tuition, Joint Degrees 117 Part-Time Program 21 Two LL.M. Degrees, Requirements for 64 Requirements for Students on Two-Credit Seminars, Graduate Programs 71 Non-Immigrant Visas 23, 57, 76 Upperclass J.D. Program of Study 125 Residence Life, Office of 133 Upperclass Legal Writing Requirement 19 Restrictions on Student Employment, Visa Reporting Requirements for J.D. Program 36 International Students, Graduate Programs 75 Restrictions on Student Employment, Visas, Graduate Programs 57, 67, 68, 74, 76 Graduate Programs 57, 76 Visas, J.D. Program 23, 29, 36 Review Process for a Failing Grade 29, 74 Withdrawal and Leaves of Absence Policies, Review Process for a Passing Grade 29 Graduate Programs 77 Sandra Day O’Connor Project on the Withdrawals and Leaves of Absence, State of the Judiciary 138 J.D. Program 36 Scholarships 173 Withdrawals from Individual Courses, State-Federal Climate Resource Center 138 Graduate Programs 77 Student Life, Office of 133 Withdrawals from Individual Courses, Student Conduct in the J.D. Program 36 Job Search Process 76, 100 Women’s Law and Public Policy Student Disciplinary Code 93 Fellowship Program 138 Student Records, Academic 88 Workplace Flexibility 2010 138 Student Records, Access 88 Writing Center 128 Student Records, Directory Information Written Work, Graduate Programs 73 and Confidentiality 88 Written Work, J.D. Program 29 Student Work, Confidentiality 89

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin Academic Calendar 195

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER 2009-2010 ACADEMIC CALENDAR

2009 FALL SEMESTER Tues., Dec. 8 – Final Exams Sat., Dec. 19 Mon., July 27 -Tuition due for incoming J.D. students Fri., Dec. 18 All Papers Due unless other due date set -Tuition due for incoming Graduate by the professor Students

Sat., Aug. 22 - On-Campus Interview Program Sun., Aug. 23 Orientation 2010 SPRING SEMESTER

Mon. Jan. 4 Spring tuition due for all students Mon., Aug. 24 On-Campus Interview Week Begins Mon., Jan. 11 -Week One Classes begin for first-year Thurs., Aug. 20 - Registration and Orientation for J.D. Students Fri., Aug. 21 incoming J.D. Transfer Students -Week One Mini Courses begin for Upperclass Students Mon., Aug. 24 Registration and Orientation for Note: Mandatory attendance is required incoming J.D. Visiting Students at all Week One class sessions, first-year and upperclass, Monday – Friday. Some Tues., Aug. 25 - Registration and Orientation for clinics may require their students to Wed., Aug. 26 First Year J.D. Students begin clinic activities this week

Wed., Aug. 26 - First Year Orientation Mon., Jan. 18 MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY: Fri., Aug. 28 No classes meet

Mon., Aug. 24 -Registration and Orientation for new Tues., Jan. 19 Regular, semester-long classes begin for Graduate Students all students -Tuition due for all Continuing, Transfer and Visiting Students Tues., Jan. 19 – Add/Drop and Wait-list activity Tues., Jan. 26 Late Registration: Continuing students Tues., Aug. 25 – Continuing Orientation for new ($80 late fee) (Tuition due upon Fri., Aug. 28 Graduate Students registration)

Mon., Feb 15 PRESIDENTS DAY: No classes meet Thurs., Aug. 27 -Late Registration: all unregistered New and Continuing Students ($80 late Tues., Feb. 16 – Faculty Retreat: No classes meet fee) (Tuition due upon registration) Wed., Feb. 17 -Financial Aid Transactions: All Students Thurs., Feb. 18 Monday classes meet instead of Mon., Aug. 31 Classes Begin Thursday classes

Mon., Aug. 31 – -Add/Drop and Wait-list activity Sun., March 7 – SPRING BREAK: No classes meet Tues., Sept. 8 for Fall and Spring Courses Sun., March 14 -Late Registration: (Tuition due upon registration) Fri., April 2 – Easter Break: No classes meet Sun., April 4 Mon., Sept. 7 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY: No classes meet Sat., May 1 Last Day of Classes

Mon., Oct. 12 COLUMBUS DAY HOLIDAY: No Mon., May 3 -Snow Make Up and Reading Day classes meet -May Graduates’ Papers Due unless an earlier due date set by the professor Tues., Oct. 13 Monday classes meet instead of Tuesday classes Tues., May 4 – Final Exams Tues., May 18 Wed., Nov. 25 - THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY: Sun., Nov. 29 No classes meet Tues., May 18 All Other Papers Due unless due date set by the professor Sat., Dec. 5 Last day of classes Sun., May 23 Commencement Sat., Dec. 5 and Make-up and Reading Day Mon., Dec. 7

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin 196

2009-2010 Georgetown Law Bulletin