DOCSLIB.ORG

Role of Alternative Polyadenylation in Epigenetic Silencing and Antisilencing Liuyin Maa, Cheng Guob, and Qingshun Quinn Lia,B,1 Oxidative Responses (10–12)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Role of Alternative Polyadenylation in Epigenetic Silencing and Antisilencing Liuyin Maa, Cheng Guob, and Qingshun Quinn Lia,B,1 Oxidative Responses (10–12) COMMENTARY COMMENTARY Role of alternative polyadenylation in epigenetic silencing and antisilencing Liuyin Maa, Cheng Guob, and Qingshun Quinn Lia,b,1 oxidative responses (10–12). Genomewide aKey Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, College of analyses by deep sequencing have revealed the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China; – b that 70 80% of human and plant genes are and Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 subject to APA (13–15). The role of such abundant APAs in cellular functions, how- ever, remains largely unknown. Epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation Eulgem (5), anti-silencing 1 (ASI1)by It was previously suggested that histone and histone modifications are widely in- Wangetal.(6),andincrease in bonsai modification might influence poly(A) choice volved in regulating different aspects of methylation 1 (IBM1) by Saze et al. (7). through correlation analysis (16). The signif- developmental and environmental responses What distinguishes the latter group of icance of the work on EDM2 and ASI1 is that (1). Meanwhile, DNA methylation and his- genes from ROS1 is that they seem to be they provide direct genetic evidence demon- tone modification are also used constitutively involved in posttranscriptional regulation strating an involvement of epigenetic marks to silence transposable elements and repeat through alternative polyadenylation (APA). in the selection of APA sites. EDM2, identi- elements (TREs) (2). Such TRE-mediated si- Polyadenylation is an essential mRNA fied as an enhancer of fungal disease resis- lencing should necessarily be limited to the processing step for almost all genes in tance (17), specifically recognizes intronic intended targets only and not spread to ad- eukaryotes (8, 9). The poly(A) site defines heterochromatin in its target genes presum- jacent genes and their regulatory elements. the end of the transcript and thus its 3′- ably through its composite plant homeodo- Higher eukaryotic organisms have evolved UTR. However, an alternate site of process- main (PHD) domain (4). This binding of antisilencing mechanisms to keep the bal- ing and poly(A) addition would create a EDM2 somehow blocks the poly(A) site ance between silencing and antisilencing different transcript by an inclusion or ex- choice of the transcript in the vicinity of that is required for precise gene expression clusion of certain RNA sequences such as the binding location. This is deduced from regulation. Earlier work revealed that re- the miRNA target site, a recognition site of thefactthatintheedm2 mutant, use of pressor of silencing 1 (ROS1)isonesuch an mRNA stability factor, or a translational intronic poly(A) sites [so called proximal antisilencing gene (3). Recently, a group of repressor. In recent years, APA has been poly(A) sites, in contrast to the full-length unique antisilencing genes has been dis- shown to change the fate of a cell or a de- distal poly(A) sites] results in the generation covered, including enhanced downy mil- velopmental process and to alter cellular of shortened transcripts that encode no or dew 2 (EDM2) reported both by Lei et al. responses to the environment, including nonfunctional proteins (4, 5). In other words, in PNAS (4) and earlier by Tsuchiya and tumorigenesis, flowering time control, and the normal function of EDM2 is to reduce the production of nonfunctional transcripts and to promote the generation of full-length mRNA ending at the distal poly(A) site. The net result is the avoidance of reduced gene expression caused by silencing due to TREs in the intron (hence antisilencing). The antisilencing phenomena of EDM2 were clearly demonstrated in the APA of a group of genes with large TRE-containing genes such as the fungal disease resistance gene resistance to Peronospora parasitica (RPP7)(5)andIBM1 (4). Interestingly, an- other gene (ASI1) was also found to have very similar function of generating APA of IBM1 transcripts (6). Adding an additional layer of complexity to this story is the fact that IBM1 itself is a histone H3K9 demethylase that pre- vents plant-specific CHG methylation (7). Fig. 1. Hypothetic model for antisilencing regulation of alternative polyadenylation. In WT Arabidopsis, EDM2 and ASI1 bind to the intronic heterochromatin region by recognizing enriched epigenetic marks. With the assistance of an Author contributions: L.M., C.G., and Q.Q.L. wrote the paper. unknown factor X, the three proteins form a complex that potently masks the poly(A) signals from being recognized The authors declare no conflict of interest. by the polyadenylation apparatus riding on the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Consequently, the distal poly(A) site is used. In the edm2 or asi1 mutant, absence of either EDM2 or ASI1 reduces the masking effect on the proximal See companion article on page 527. poly(A) site.The result is an extensive use of the proximal site, producing shortened transcripts encoding nonfunctional 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: liq@ proteins, leading to a silencing effect of the target gene. miamioh.edu. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1321025111 PNAS | January 7, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 1 | 9–10 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 Moreover, genomewide epigenetic modifica- of disease resistance conferred is tightly of intronic poly(A) sites in Arabidopsis and tion profiles of all three mutants (asi1, associated with its transcript level (5). rice (14, 15). Further analysis of these intronic edm2,andibm1)largelyoverlap,which Could the APA just be a byproduct of sites would broaden our view on the in- indicates that they work together through other modes of regulation? This possibil- terrelationship of RNA processing and a similar antisilencing pathway. In fact, it ity is very unlikely. There exist other epigenetic regulation. was suggested that both ASI1 and EDM2 examples showing that APA is a predom- The connection between gene silencing function mostly through IBM1 by modulat- inant way to attenuate the expression of and polyadenylation was demonstrated by ing APA of IBM1 transcripts (4, 5). Herr et al. (21) where mutations of poly(A) The question is how are these epigenomic The significance of the protein factors led to enhanced silencing of marks sensed by the polyadenylation ma- work on EDM2 and ASI1 some genes. This work is indicative that chinery so that a different poly(A) site is normal functions of these polyadenylation chosen? Polyadenylation is a cotranscriptional is that they provide factors prevent silencing of the tested genes, event where numerous factors affecting tran- direct genetic evidence an equivalent to an antisilencing effect. While scription would impact polyadenylation (18). demonstrating an there was not clear demonstration of the The polyadenylation machinery is composed of 20–25 different proteins in plants that rec- involvement of involvement of TREs, this is further evidence ognize a set of poly(A) signals on the pre- epigenetic marks in the that motivates investigations to elucidate mRNA (9). The use of one poly(A) site selection of APA sites. a potential direct engagement of poly(A) over the other is likely owing to the relative factors in antisilencing. Meanwhile, many interesting questions strength of the polyadenylation signal being genes. One involves the flower control locus remain. What are the specific functions of perceived by poly(A) machinery, as well as A (FCA) gene, a regulator of flower locus C the availability of the site. It is also possible (FLC) expression, and of flowering time in ASI1 and EDM2 during this process? If any, that associated protein(s) may recruit (or re- Arabidopsis (12). Another is the oxidative what are other factors involved? Is binding pel) the polyadenylation apparatus close to tolerant 6 (OXT6) gene in Arabidopsis that of ASI1 or EDM2 to intronic heterochroma- a particular site. It is equally possible that a encodes two proteins: a smaller one pro- tin region needed to influence poly(A) site protein could inhibit the function of the duced through use of an intronic poly(A) choice? Is RNA modification (e.g., methyla- complex. One possibility in the EDM2 or site and a larger one produced using a distal tion) or RNA secondary structure involved? ASI1 cases is that, while binding to epige- poly(A) site (11). Both FCA and OXT6 What is the role of the splicing of the large netic marks, these proteins also interact genes have large introns where the proxi- intron in all this? Addressing these questions with the poly(A) signals, thus blocking mal APA occurs. However, it seems that would ensure a fine-grained understand- the recognition of the proximal poly(A) these APA events use a different mechanism ing of posttranscriptional regulation of genes site.Indeed,ASI1wasfoundtohaveanRNA because these introns do not contain TREs in this ever-increasing complex world of recognition motif and a bromo-adjacent ho- (4). Recent work by Duc et al. indicated that the epigenome. mology domain involved in preventing the a spen family protein FPA might be involved genomewide CHG methylation (6). EDM2, in the selection of some intronic polyad- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. Research in the authors’ labora- on the other hand, possesses an N6-adenine tory is supported by US National Science Foundation Grant enylation (20). Nonetheless, recent genome- IOS–0817829 (to Q.Q.L.) and US National Institutes of methyltransferase domain (4), providing a po- level profiling discovered a significant amount Health Grant 1R15GM94732-1 A1 (to Q.Q.L.). tential to methylate adenine residues in RNA. Methylated adenine was shown to affect 3′-end formation (19). Binding of EDM2 to 1 Chinnusamy V, Zhu J-K (2009) Epigenetic regulation of stress 11 Zhang J, et al. (2008) A polyadenylation factor subunit implicated in chromatin through its PHD domain could responses in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12(2):133–139.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mutation of the AAUAAA Polyadenylation Signal Depresses in Vitro Splicing of Proximal but Not Distal Introns
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Mutation of the AAUAAA polyadenylation signal depresses in vitro splicing of proximal but not distal introns Maho Niwa and Susan M. Berget Marrs McClean Department of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 USA To investigate the relationship between splicing and polyadenylation during the production of vertebrate mRNAs, we examined the effect of mutation of a poly(A) site on splicing of upstream introns. Mutation of the AAUAAA polyadenylation consensus sequence inhibited in vitro splicing of an upstream intron. The magnitude of the depression depended on the magnesium concentration. Dependence of splicing on polyadenylation signals suggests the existence of interaction between polyadenylation and splicing factors. In multi-intron precursor RNAs containing duplicated splice sites, mutation of the poly(A) site inhibited removal of the last intron, but not the removal of introns farther upstream. Inhibition of removal of only the last intron suggests segmental recognition of multi-exon precursor RNAs and is consistent with previous suggestions that signals at both ends of an exon are required for effective splicing of an upstream intron. [Key Words: Polyadenylation signal; splicing; vertebrate RNAs] Received July 31, 1991; revised version accepted September 10, 1991. The majority of vertebrate mRNAs undergo both splic- Using chimeric RNAs competent for both in vitro ing and polyadenylation during maturation. The rela- splicing and polyadenylation, we recently reported that tionship between the two processing steps has been un- in vitro polyadenylation is stimulated when an intron is clear. Polyadenylation has been reported to occur shortly placed upstream of a poly(A) site (Niwa et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14: Functional Genomics Learning Objectives
    Chapter 14: Functional Genomics Learning objectives Upon reading this chapter, you should be able to: ■ define functional genomics; ■ describe the key features of eight model organisms; ■ explain techniques of forward and reverse genetics; ■ discuss the relation between the central dogma and functional genomics; and ■ describe proteomics-based approaches to functional genomics. Outline : Functional genomics Introduction Relation between genotype and phenotype Eight model organisms E. coli; yeast; Arabidopsis; C. elegans; Drosophila; zebrafish; mouse; human Functional genomics using reverse and forward genetics Reverse genetics: mouse knockouts; yeast; gene trapping; insertional mutatgenesis; gene silencing Forward genetics: chemical mutagenesis Functional genomics and the central dogma Approaches to function; Functional genomics and DNA; …and RNA; …and protein Proteomic approaches to functional genomics CASP; protein-protein interactions; protein networks Perspective Albert Blakeslee (1874–1954) studied the effect of altered chromosome numbers on the phenotype of the jimson-weed Datura stramonium, a flowering plant. Introduction: Functional genomics Functional genomics is the genome-wide study of the function of DNA (including both genes and non-genic regions), as well as RNA and proteins encoded by DNA. The term “functional genomics” may apply to • the genome, transcriptome, or proteome • the use of high-throughput screens • the perturbation of gene function • the complex relationship of genotype and phenotype Functional genomics approaches to high throughput analyses Relationship between genotype and phenotype The genotype of an individual consists of the DNA that comprises the organism. The phenotype is the outward manifestation in terms of properties such as size, shape, movement, and physiology. We can consider the phenotype of a cell (e.g., a precursor cell may develop into a brain cell or liver cell) or the phenotype of an organism (e.g., a person may have a disease phenotype such as sickle‐cell anemia).
    [Show full text]
  • Polymerse Activity
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 CHARACTERIZATION OF PLANT POLYADENYLATION TRANSACTING FACTORS-FACTORS THAT MODIFY POLY(A) POLYMERSE ACTIVITY Kevin Patrick Forbes University of Kentucky Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Forbes, Kevin Patrick, "CHARACTERIZATION OF PLANT POLYADENYLATION TRANSACTING FACTORS- FACTORS THAT MODIFY POLY(A) POLYMERSE ACTIVITY" (2005). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 444. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/444 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Kevin Patrick Forbes The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2004 CHARACTERIZATION OF PLANT POLYADENYLATION TRANS- ACTING FACTORS-FACTORS THAT MODIFY POLY(A) POLYMERSE ACTIVITY _________________________________________ ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION _________________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Agriculture at the University of Kentucky By Kevin Patrick Forbes Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Arthur G. Hunt, Professor of Agronomy Lexington, Kentucky 2004 Copyright ” Kevin Patrick Forbes 2004 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION CHARACTERIZATION OF PLANT POLYADENYLATION TRANS-ACTING FACTORS-FACTORS THAT MODIFY POLY(A) POLYMERSE ACTIVITY Plant polyadenylation factors have proven difficult to purify and characterize, owing to the presence of excessive nuclease activity in plant nuclear extracts, thereby precluding the identification of polyadenylation signal-dependent processing and polyadenylation in crude extracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrey L. Karamyshev
    CURRICULUM VITAE Andrey L. Karamyshev Assistant Professor Department of Cell Biology and Biochemistry! Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center! 3601 4th Street, Mail Stop 6540! Lubbock, TX 79430 Phone: (806) 743-4102 Fax: (806) 743-2990 e-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION: Postdoctoral Studies: Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Advisor: Dr. Yoshikazu Nakamura). Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Advisor: Dr. Arthur E. Johnson). Ph.D. in Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia. M.S., Biology, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia. FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION: Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology. RESEARCH INTERESTS Molecular mechanisms of human diseases. Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Gene silencing and translational repression. mRNA and protein quality control. RNA stability and degradation. siRNAs/miRNAs. Prolactin, CFTR, secretory and membrane proteins. Protein translation, folding and transport. Protein-protein interactions. SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (see list below) 31 publications (total), including 25 full-length peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals, 5 articles in the Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology (Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N.Y.), and chapter in a book. PRESENTATIONS (90 total, see lists below) Results were presented at various international and national meetings, conferences and symposia (58 presentations), as well as during invited or selected talks (32 talks) at different universities and meetings around the world. Andrey L. Karamyshev, Ph.D. RESEARCH EXPERIENCE AND POSITIONS 2016-present Assistant Professor (Tenure track), Department of Cell Biology and Biochemistry!, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center!, Lubbock, TX. 2009-2016 Assistant Professor (Research track), Department of Physiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX.
    [Show full text]
  • Switch from Translation Initiation to Elongation Needs Not4 and Not5 Collaboration
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/850859; this version posted November 22, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Switch from translation initiation to elongation needs Not4 and Not5 collaboration George E Allen1°, Olesya O Panasenko1°, Zoltan Villanyi1,&, Marina Zagatti1, Benjamin Weiss1, 2 2 1* 5 Christine Polte , Zoya Ignatova , Martine A Collart 1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Genomics Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland 2Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Hamburg, Germany °Equally contributing first authors 10 *Correspondence to: [email protected] &Current Address: Dept of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Szeged Abstract: Not4 and Not5 are crucial components of the Ccr4-Not complex with pivotal functions in mRNA metabolism. Both associate with ribosomes but mechanistic insights on their 15 function remain elusive. Here we determine that Not5 and Not4 synchronously impact translation initiation and Not5 alone alters translation elongation. Deletion of Not5 causes elongation defects in a codon-dependent fashion, increasing and decreasing the ribosome dwelling occupancy at minor and major codons, respectively. This larger difference in codons’ translation velocities alters translation globally and enables kinetically unfavorable processes 20 such as nascent chain deubiquitination to take place. In turn, this leads to abortive translation and favors protein aggregation. These findings highlight the global impact of Not4 and Not5 in controlling the speed of mRNA translation and transition from initiation to elongation. Summary: Not4 and Not5 regulate translation synchronously but distinguishably, facilitating 25 smooth transition from initiation to elongation Results and discussion The Ccr4-Not complex is a global regulator of mRNA metabolism in eukaryotic cells (for review see (1)).
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Silencing: Double-Stranded RNA Mediated Mrna Degradation and Gene Inactivation
    Cell Research (2001); 11(3):181-186 http://www.cell-research.com REVIEW Gene silencing: Double-stranded RNA mediated mRNA degradation and gene inactivation 1, 2 1 TANG WEI *, XIAO YAN LUO , VANESSA SANMUELS 1 North Carolina State University, Forest Biotechnology Group, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 2 University of North Carolina, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA ABSTRACT The recent development of gene transfer approaches in plants and animals has revealed that transgene can undergo silencing after integration in the genome. Host genes can also be silenced as a consequence of the presence of a homologous transgene. More and more investigations have demonstrated that double- stranded RNA can silence genes by triggering degradation of homologous RNA in the cytoplasm and by directing methylation of homologous nuclear DNA sequences. Analyses of Arabidopsis mutants and plant viral suppressors of silencing are unraveling RNA-silencing mechanisms and are assessing the role of me- thylation in transcriptional and posttranscriptional gene silencing. This review will focus on double-stranded RNA mediated mRNA degradation and gene inactivation in plants. Key words: Gene silencing, double-stranded RNA, methylation, homologous RNA, transgene. INTRODUCTION portant in consideration of its practical application The genome structure of plants can be altered by over the the past ten years[1-5]. Transgenes can genetic transformation. During the process of gene become silent after a long phase of expression, and transfer, Agrobacterium tumefaciens integrate part can sometimes silence the expression of homologous of their genome into the genome of susceptible elements located at ectopic positions in the genome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Poly(A) Binding Protein of Mammals, but Not of Fission Yeast, Participates in Mrna Polyadenylation
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REPORT The nuclear poly(A) binding protein of mammals, but not of fission yeast, participates in mRNA polyadenylation UWE KÜHN, JULIANE BUSCHMANN, and ELMAR WAHLE Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Halle, Germany ABSTRACT The nuclear poly(A) binding protein (PABPN1) has been suggested, on the basis of biochemical evidence, to play a role in mRNA polyadenylation by strongly increasing the processivity of poly(A) polymerase. While experiments in metazoans have tended to support such a role, the results were not unequivocal, and genetic data show that the S. pombe ortholog of PABPN1, Pab2, is not involved in mRNA polyadenylation. The specific model in which PABPN1 increases the rate of poly(A) tail elongation has never been examined in vivo. Here, we have used 4-thiouridine pulse-labeling to examine the lengths of newly synthesized poly(A) tails in human cells. Knockdown of PABPN1 strongly reduced the synthesis of full-length tails of ∼250 nucleotides, as predicted from biochemical data. We have also purified S. pombe Pab2 and the S. pombe poly(A) polymerase, Pla1, and examined their in vitro activities. Whereas PABPN1 strongly increases the activity of its cognate poly(A) polymerase in vitro, Pab2 was unable to stimulate Pla1 to any significant extent. Thus, in vitro and in vivo data are consistent in supporting a role of PABPN1 but not S. pombe Pab2 in the polyadenylation of mRNA precursors. Keywords: poly(A) binding protein; poly(A) polymerase; mRNA polyadenylation; pre-mRNA 3′; processing INTRODUCTION by poly(A) polymerase with the help of the cleavage and poly- adenylation specificity factor (CPSF), which binds the polya- The poly(A) tails of eukaryotic mRNAs are covered by specif- denylation signal AAUAAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Mrna Polyadenylation
    Turkish Journal of Biology Turk J Biol (2016) 40: 529-538 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/biology/ © TÜBİTAK Review Article doi:10.3906/biy-1505-94 Mechanisms of mRNA polyadenylation Hızlan Hıncal AĞUŞ, Ayşe Elif ERSON BENSAN* Department of Biology, Arts and Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Received: 26.05.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 21.08.2015 Final Version: 18.05.2016 Abstract: mRNA 3’-end processing involves the addition of a poly(A) tail based on the recognition of the poly(A) signal and subsequent cleavage of the mRNA at the poly(A) site. Alternative polyadenylation (APA) is emerging as a novel mechanism of gene expression regulation in normal and in disease states. APA results from the recognition of less canonical proximal or distal poly(A) signals leading to changes in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) lengths and even in some cases changes in the coding sequence of the distal part of the transcript. Consequently, RNA-binding proteins and/or microRNAs may differentially bind to shorter or longer isoforms. These changes may eventually alter the stability, localization, and/or translational efficiency of the mRNAs. Overall, the 3’ UTRs are gaining more attention as they possess a significant posttranscriptional regulation potential guided by APA, microRNAs, and RNA-binding proteins. Here we provide an overview of the recent developments in the APA field in connection with cancer as a potential oncogene activator and/or tumor suppressor silencing mechanism. A better understanding of the extent and significance of APA deregulation will pave the way to possible new developments to utilize the APA machinery and its downstream effects in cancer cells for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Silencing-Based Improvement of Antiviral Plant Immunity
    viruses Review Catch Me If You Can! RNA Silencing-Based Improvement of Antiviral Plant Immunity Fatima Yousif Gaffar and Aline Koch * Centre for BioSystems, Institute of Phytopathology, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, D-35392 Giessen, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 April 2019; Accepted: 17 July 2019; Published: 23 July 2019 Abstract: Viruses are obligate parasites which cause a range of severe plant diseases that affect farm productivity around the world, resulting in immense annual losses of yield. Therefore, control of viral pathogens continues to be an agronomic and scientific challenge requiring innovative and ground-breaking strategies to meet the demands of a growing world population. Over the last decade, RNA silencing has been employed to develop plants with an improved resistance to biotic stresses based on their function to provide protection from invasion by foreign nucleic acids, such as viruses. This natural phenomenon can be exploited to control agronomically relevant plant diseases. Recent evidence argues that this biotechnological method, called host-induced gene silencing, is effective against sucking insects, nematodes, and pathogenic fungi, as well as bacteria and viruses on their plant hosts. Here, we review recent studies which reveal the enormous potential that RNA-silencing strategies hold for providing an environmentally friendly mechanism to protect crop plants from viral diseases. Keywords: RNA silencing; Host-induced gene silencing; Spray-induced gene silencing; virus control; RNA silencing-based crop protection; GMO crops 1. Introduction Antiviral Plant Defence Responses Plant viruses are submicroscopic spherical, rod-shaped or filamentous particles which contain different kinds of genomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Regulation of Alternative Polyadenylation in the DNA Damage Response
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2019 The Role and Regulation of Alternative Polyadenylation in the DNA Damage Response Michael R. Murphy The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3105 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Investigating the Role and Regulation of Alternative Polyadenylation in the DNA Damage Response by Michael Robert Murphy A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 © 2019 Michael Robert Murphy All Rights Reserved ii The Role and Regulation of Alternative Polyadenylation in the DNA Damage Response by Michael Robert Murphy This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Biology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Dr Frida Kleiman Chair of Examining Committee Date Dr Cathy Savage-Dunn Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Dr Frida Kleiman Dr Diego Loayza Dr Olorunseun Ogunwobi Dr Kevin Ryan Dr Bin Tian THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract Investigating the Role and Regulation of Alternative Polyadenylation in the DNA Damage Response By Michael Robert Murphy Advisor: Dr Frida Esther Kleiman Cellular homeostasis is achieved by the dynamic flux in gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    GLOSSARY OF TERMS Table of Contents A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z A Amino acids: any of a class of 20 molecules that are combined to form proteins in living things. The sequence of amino acids in a protein and hence protein function are determined by the genetic code. From http://www.geneticalliance.org.uk/glossary.htm#C • The building blocks of proteins, there are 20 different amino acids. From https://www.yourgenome.org/glossary/amino-acid Antisense: Antisense nucleotides are strings of RNA or DNA that are complementary to "sense" strands of nucleotides. They bind to and inactivate these sense strands. They have been used in research, and may become useful for therapy of certain diseases (See Gene silencing). From http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Antisense_DNA.aspx. Antisense and RNA interference are referred as gene knockdown technologies: the transcription of the gene is unaffected; however, gene expression, i.e. protein synthesis (translation), is lost because messenger RNA molecules become unstable or inaccessible. Furthermore, RNA interference is based on naturally occurring phenomenon known as Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing. From http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/applsilencing/ B Biobank: A biobank is a large, organised collection of samples, usually human, used for research. Biobanks catalogue and store samples using genetic, clinical, and other characteristics such as age, gender, blood type, and ethnicity. Some samples are also categorised according to environmental factors, such as whether the donor had been exposed to some substance that can affect health.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Mammalian Oligosaccharyl-Transferase Complex
    ARTICLE Received 26 Sep 2013 | Accepted 6 Dec 2013 | Published 10 Jan 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4072 Structure of the mammalian oligosaccharyl- transferase complex in the native ER protein translocon Stefan Pfeffer1,*, Johanna Dudek2,*, Marko Gogala3, Stefan Schorr2, Johannes Linxweiler2, Sven Lang2, Thomas Becker3, Roland Beckmann3, Richard Zimmermann2 & Friedrich Fo¨rster1 In mammalian cells, proteins are typically translocated across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane in a co-translational mode by the ER protein translocon, comprising the protein- conducting channel Sec61 and additional complexes involved in nascent chain processing and translocation. As an integral component of the translocon, the oligosaccharyl-transferase complex (OST) catalyses co-translational N-glycosylation, one of the most common protein modifications in eukaryotic cells. Here we use cryoelectron tomography, cryoelectron microscopy single-particle analysis and small interfering RNA-mediated gene silencing to determine the overall structure, oligomeric state and position of OST in the native ER protein translocon of mammalian cells in unprecedented detail. The observed positioning of OST in close proximity to Sec61 provides a basis for understanding how protein translocation into the ER and glycosylation of nascent proteins are structurally coupled. The overall spatial orga- nization of the native translocon, as determined here, serves as a reliable framework for further hypothesis-driven studies. 1 Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany. 2 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saarland University, D-66421 Homburg, Germany. 3 Gene Center and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich, Department of Biochemistry, University of Munich, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
    [Show full text]