Handbook of Frogs and Toads ... of the United States and Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Handbook of Frogs and Toads ... of the United States and Canada MARINE Received Accession Given by. Place, HANDBOOKS OF AMERICAN NATURAL HISTORY edited by Albert Hazen Wright Volume I HANDBOOK OF FROGS AND TOADS by Anna Allen Wright Albert Hazen Wright 9r;j HANDBOOK OF FROGS AND TOADS The Frogs and Toads of the United States and Canada By ANNA ALLEN WRIGHT ALBERT HAZEN WRIGHT Professor of Zoology, Cornell University Ithaca, New York The Comstock Publishing Co., Inc. 1933 COPYRIGHT, 1933. BY THE COMSTOCK PUBLISHING CO., Inc. printed in the united states of america The Cayuga Press ithaca, n.y. €§23 This little volume, meant to serve the public, the scientist, and the group treated, is dedicated to the four American women who, in addition to serving the public and science generously, have in the last half-century contributed most nota- bly to the study of this group: Mary Hewes Hinckley, 1845- Mary Cynthia Dickerson, 1 866-1 923 Helen Dean King, 1869— Helen Thompson Gaige, Preface In 1930, while preparing a monograph and also an illustrated key of North American frogs, we resolved on a small book as a guide for teachers, students, and even younger naturalists. Of each species, there is a plate of photographs from life and a two-page resume of its characters and habits. The plates and script are meant to cultivate an interest in the lay mind and help the beginner in his or her quests. Several species which since 1930 have appeared in the United States or Canada, we have been unable to illustrate, e.g., Bufo americanus copei. We have, however, attempted to illustrate all subspecies whether they be on slender or firm grounds. Pictures from life of many of these debatable forms have never been presented before. Even though it may eventually prove there is one meadow frog, yet the four forms are presented; even though only one or two forms of Pseudacris nigrita may be good, yet all five subspecies appear herein. The pictures from life may help to stimulate an elucidation of some of these moot questions in our knowledge. The photographs are largely new and not from our previous pub- lications, and are the work of the authors. In the species accounts there occasionally appears a croaker, a tadpole or an egg photograph formerly used in the Frogs of the Okefinokee Swamp. Such pictures were taken by F. Harper and the authors. Many of the frogs were photographed in a jar of water and the water line is evident on the fore part of the body or on either side of the head. While this work was going through the press, the third edition ( T 933) of Check List of North American Amphibians and Reptiles by L. Stejneger andT. Barbour appeared. The Check List indicates that the range of Hyla graciiipes extends from southern Arizona south- ward. We overlooked this statement in Dr. Kellogg's (1932) paper and this species does not appear in this work. Contents Preface viii Contents ix General account i Common names i Scientific name 2 Range 3 Habitat 3 Size 3 General appearance 4 Structure 4 Voice 5 Breeding 7 Eggs . , 7 Tadpoles 9 Development and transformation n Notes 1.2 Keys 13 Accounts of species (with a plate of each species) .... 36 Bell toads 3 6 American bell toad. Ascaphus truei 36 Spadefoots 38 Couch's spadefoot. Scaphiopus couchii 38 Hammond's spadefoot. Scaphiopus hammondii ... 40 Holbrook's spadefoot. Scaphiopus holbrookii holbrookii . 42 Key West spadefoot. Scaphiopus holbrookii a/bus (no plate) . 43 Hurter's spadefoot. Scaphiopus holbrookii hurterii (no plate) " 44 Toads 4^ Colorado River toad. Bufo alvarius 46 American toad. Bufo americanus americanus .... 48 Hudson Bay American toad. Bufo americanus copei (no plate) 49 Northwestern toad. Bufo boreas boreas 50 California toad. Bufo boreas halophilus 52 Southern California toad. Bufo californicus .... 54 Yosemite toad. Bufo canorus 56 Great Plains toad. Bufo cognatus 58 ix 1 2 4 2 i Spadefoot toad. Bufo compactilis 60 Little green toad. Bufo debilis 62 Fowler's toad. Buf fowler 64 Canadian toad. Bufo hemiophrys 66 Marine toad. Bufo marinus 68 Canyon toad. Bufo punctatus 70 Oak toad. Bufo quercicus 72 Southern toad. Bufo terrestris 74 Mexican toad. Bufo valliceps 76 Rocky Mountain toad. Bufo woodhousii 78 Cricket-frogs 80 Cricket-frog. Acris gryllus 80 Cricket-frog. Acris crepitans (no plate) 82 Chorus frogs 84 Chorus frog. Pseudacris brachyphona 84 Swamp chorus frog. Pseudacris nigrita nigrita ... 86 Clarke's striped tree frog. Pseudacris nigrita clarkii . 88 Eastern swamp cricket frog. Pseudacris nigritaferiarum . 90 Northern striped tree frog. Pseudacris nigrita septen- trionalis 92 Three striped tree frog. Pseudacris nigrita triseriata . 94 Western chorus frog. Pseudacris occidentalis (no plate) . 96 Little chorus frog. Pseudacris ocularis 98 Ornate chorus frog. Pseudacris ornata 100 Texas ornate chorus frog. Pseudacris streckeri 102 Tree frogs 104 Anderson's tree frog. Hyla andersonii 104 Canyon tree frog. Hyla arenicolor 106 Whistling tree frog. Hyla avivoca 108 Mexican tree frog. Hyla baudinii baudinii . no Green tree frog. Hyla cinerea cinerea 112 Miller's tree frog. Hyla cinerea evittata 114 Spring peeper. Hyla crucifer 116 Sonora tree frog. Hyla eximia 118 Piney woods tree frog. Hyla femoralis 120 Florida tree frog. Hyla gratiosa 122 Pacific tree frog. Hyla regilla 124 Giant tree frog. Hyla septentrionalis 126 Squirrel tree frog. Hyla squirella 128 Common tree toad. Hyla versicolor versicolor . 130 Cope's tree frog. Hyla versicolor chrysoscelis . 132 Dusky tree toad. Hyla versicolor phaeocrypta (no plate) . 134 Robber frogs 136 Mexican cliff frog. Eleutherodactylus augusti . 136 Texas cliff frog. Eleutherodactylus latrans 138 Ricord's frog. Eleutherodactylus ricordii 140 i White-lipped frog. Leptodactylus albilabris . 142 Camp's frog. Syrrhophus campi 144 Marnock's frog. Syrrhophus marnockii 146 True frogs 148 Gopher frog. Rana aesopus 148 Northern gopher frog. Rana areolata 150 Oregon red-legged frog. Rana aurora aurora . 152 California red-legged frog. Rana aurora draytonii . 154 California yellow-legged frog. Rana boylii boylit . 156 Sierra Madre yellow-legged frog. Rana boyHi muscosa . 158 Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog. Rana boylii sierrae . 160 Northern wood frog. Rana cantabrigensis 162 Bull frog. Rana catesbeiana 164 Green frog. Rana clamitans 166 Southern bull frog. Rana grylio 168 River-swamp frog. Rana heckscheri 170 Nevada frog. Rana onca 172 Pickerel frog. Rana palustris 174 Meadow frog. Rana pipiens pipiens . ... 176 Unspotted meadow frog. Rana pipiens burns . 178 Mottled meadow frog. Rana pipiens kandiyohi . 180 Western spotted frog. Rana pretiosa pretiosa . 182 Nevada spotted frog. Rana pretiosa luteiventris (no plate) 183 Mink frog. Rana septentrionalis 184 Southern meadow frog. Rana sphenocephala . 186 Wood frog. Rana sylvatica 188 Mexican frog. Rana tarahumarae 190 Carpenter frog. Rana virgatipes 192 Narrow-mouthed toads 194 Carolina narrow-mouthed toad. Gastrophryne carolinensis 1 94 Texas narrow-mouthed toad. Gastrophryne texen sis . 196 Mitchell's narrow-mouthed toad. Gastrophryne areolata (no plate) 198 Taylor's toad. Hypopachus cuneus 200 Bibliography 203 Index ^ 219 XI General Account^ In the treatment of each species, the topical outline is as follows: Common names General appearance Scientific name Structure Range Voice Habitat Breeding Size Notes Common names. We of the United States and Canada have con- cerned ourselves little with distinctive names for the amphibians. Most of the common names of the salamanders and frogs are col- lective. Just as all salamanders are generally called water dogs or lizards, so also the frogs are known by few common names, (toads, frogs or tree frogs). For example, people use the word "peeper" in- discriminately for several small frogs that call in the early spring. Others call peepers lizards. Normally we expect common names to come from the people at large, but with amphibians and reptiles, most of the common names in literature are really bookish names. Many are translations of the scientific names. The names may come from widely different sources of which the following are a few: (i) The person after whom the species is named. Example: Couch's spadefoot. Scaphiopus couchii Baird. (2) The person who named the species. Example: Viosca's tree frog. Hyla avivoca Viosca. (3) The person who first collected it. Example: Taylor's toad. Hypopachus cuneus Cope. (4) A country. Examples: Canadian toad, American bell toad, Mexican toad. (5) A state or province. Examples: Sonora hyla, Winnipeg toad, California red-legged frog. (6) Habitats. Examples: River-swamp frog, pond frog, house frog, salt marsh frog, canyon tree toad, desert tree toad, crayfish frog, gopher frog, wood frog, savanna cricket, cliff frog. (7) Habits. Examples: Chameleon tree frog, solitary spadefoot, grasshopper frog. (8) Structural characters. Examples: Ribbed toad, narrow- mouthed toad, toothless frog, femoral hyla, thick skinned frog. (9) Voice. Examples: Bell frog, screaming frog, pig frog, rattler, chorus frog, cricket frog. (10) Color. Examples: Three lined tree frog, striped tree frogs, ornate tree frog, green toad, cinereous hyla. (n) Seasons. Examples: Spring peeper, shad frog. (12) Miscellaneous sources of many kinds: Folklore. Example: Charming toad. Legend says this toad, B. terrestris, turns your eye green. Use (bait). Example: Pickerel frog. Weather signs. Example: Rain frog. Odor. Example: Mink frog. Scientific name. Any consideration of the scientific name which an animal bears implies an understanding of the scheme of classification. All living things fall into two groups or kingdoms. The plants are treated in the science of Botany, the animals in Zoology. The animal kingdom has several major subdivisions or phyla, the last being the Vertebrata (vertebrates). In the vertebrate phylum, the various classes are known as fishes (Pisces), amphibians (Amphibia), reptiles (Reptilia), birds (Aves) and mammals (Mammalia). We designate the study of fishes as Ichthyology, that of birds, Ornithology, that of mammals, Mammalogy, but we group together amphibians and reptiles as the science of Herpetology.
Recommended publications
  • Endoparasites of Various Species of Anurans in Penang Island, Peninsular Malaysia
    ENDOPARASITES OF VARIOUS SPECIES OF ANURANS IN PENANG ISLAND, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA ZATIL SHAKINAH BINTI ABDULLAH UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 2013 ENDOPARASITES OF VARIOUS SPECIES OF ANURANS IN PENANG ISLAND, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA by ZATIL SHAKINAH BINTI ABDULLAH Thesis submitted is fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science April 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praises to Allah S.W.T., The Most Merciful and The Most Gracious that always give hope and best way for me even in my hardest situation, Allah S.W.T always guide me. I would like to gratitude for all the people that supported me until finished this thesis. First of all I would like to express the deepest appreciation to my main supervisor Professor Abdul Wahab bin Abdul Rahman for his guidance, advises, moral support, and willingness to spend time in spite of their busy schedule for discussion through this study. Also a big thank to my co-supervisor Prof. Madya Dr. Zary Shariman bin Yahaya for his advises and encouragements. I would also like to thank to Encik Faizal as my field assistant from Zoology laboratory in helping me during fieldwork. I thank to Institute Postgraduate Siswazah Universiti Sains Malaysia for giving me some grant for conducting my research. I also thank to Dr. Krishnasamy from Medical Research Institute for helping me in process of identification on parasites. I would like to say thank you to Ministry of Higher Education for sponsor me MyMaster to support my postgraduate study in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Deepest thankful to my mother, my father, my husband, my sisters, my brothers, my grandparents and also my auntie for all their support, encourage, and for always pray for me.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Utilization of Reclaimed Habitat on Phosphate Mined Lands in Florida: a Research Synopsis and Habitat Design Recommendations'
    VERTEBRATE UTILIZATION OF RECLAIMED HABITAT ON PHOSPHATE MINED LANDS IN FLORIDA: A RESEARCH SYNOPSIS AND HABITAT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS' by J. H. Kiefer, PE, PWS2 Abstract: Several studies have documented the cumulative presence of 348 species of vertebrates (mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish) on reclaimed phosphate mines in Florida. Many of these species, however, are found at low population densities or on a small number of sites. The studies also provided comparative data for unmined habitat in the region and reported 324 species. About 12% of the species reported for reclaimed habitat were not reported for unmined habitat, while 6% of the species reported for unmined habitat were not reported for reclaimed habitat. Similar numbers of rare and endangered species occur on reclaimed and unmined habitats in the region. Differences in the fauna! assemblages of reclaimed and unmined areas can generally be traced to the effects of habitat maturity, wetland hydroperiod, the presence of large lakes, sandy substrates, and dispersal factors. The information suggests that additional species, or more robust populations of particular species, could be recruited to reclaimed habitat if several factors are incorporated into designs. Most reclaimed wetlands were constructed to have relatively stable water levels and extended hydroperiods. More ephemeral marshes should be created. Most uplands are reclaimed with a loamy-overburden soil cap. Large sand lenses should be left at the surface to provide a more suitable medium for fossorial animals. More care should be taken to situate reclaimed habitats to facilitate animal movement between habitat types. Many projects provide only two vegetative strata (trees and groundcover).
    [Show full text]
  • Mesic Pine Flatwoods
    Mesic Pine Flatwoods he mesic pine flatwoods of South Florida are of FNAI Global Rank: Undetermined critical, regional importance to the biota of South FNAI State Rank: S4 TFlorida. They provide essential forested habitat for a Federally Listed Species in S. FL: 9 variety of wildlife species including: wide-ranging, large carnivores such as the Florida panther (Puma (=Felis) State Listed Species in S. FL: 40 concolor coryi) and the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus); mid-sized carnivores; fox squirrels (Sciurus niger spp.); and deer (Odocoileus Mesic pine flatwoods. Original photograph by Deborah Jansen. virginianus). They provide tree canopy for canopy- dependent species including neotropical migrants, tree-cavity dependent species, and tree-nesting species. Mesic pine flatwoods are also important as the principal dry ground in South Florida, furnishing refuge and cover for ground-nesting vertebrates as well as habitat for non- aquatic plant life (such as upland perennials and annuals). During the summer wet season, the mesic pine flatwoods of South Florida function as the upland ark for non-aquatic animals. Mesic flatwoods serve as ground bird nesting areas; adult tree frog climbing areas; black bear foraging, denning, and travelways; and essential red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) foraging and nesting habitat. At the current rate of habitat conversion, the mesic pine flatwoods, once the most abundant upland habitat in South Florida, is in danger of becoming one of the rarest habitats in South Florida. The impact of this loss on wide- ranging species, listed species, and biodiversity in South Florida could be irreparable. Synonymy The mesic pine flatwoods association of southwest Florida has been variously recognized and alluded to in the plant community literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Justin Eddy From: Patty Frantz Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 10:26 AM To: Joyce Chisolm; Justin Eddy; Gayle Nipper; Yolanda Velazquez Subject: FW: Alafia River Mit Bank CompleteClarificationResponse_03062017 Attachments: PLANS.pdf Please upload to App Id 696643. Thanks. From: sharon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 1:31 PM To: Patty Frantz <[email protected]>; John Emery <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Alafia River Mit Bank CompleteClarificationResponse_03062017 Hi and good afternoon Pat and John: With respect to what I sent you Monday, I found a minor discrepancy in the ‘Plans” Component. The oversight lies in Mitigation Plan Tables 4 & 6 that I had not fixed after the changes to access. Please discard the “Plans” pdf package sent on Monday and replace it with what is attached. Table 1 and UMAM Parts I & II are correct. The number of credits should be 35.52 not 35.48 as shown in Parts I & II but not Table 4. The correction is on Table 4: adjust score 7.15 to 7.19 credits with 89.93 acres for Mitigation Category U2. The corrected adjustment on Table 6 is: 1.77 to 1.78 In the Bank Credits segment attached with the “Plans” the acres were updated to reflect the corrected 89.93 U2 acres. Thank you and my apologies for the oversight… Sharon Collins TerraBlue Environmental P.O. Box 135 Homosassa Springs, FL 34447 386-878-3064 [email protected] From: sharon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 9:57 AM To: Patty Frantz ([email protected]); John Emery ([email protected]); Adrienne Vining ([email protected]) Cc: Campbell McLean ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Alafia River Mit Bank CompleteClarificationResponse_03062017 Hi and good morning Pat, John and Adrienne: As mentioned below, for your internal use to make your search for approved documents easier I sent you a table.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Possibilités De Dispersion Et Éléments D'habitat-Refuge Dans Un
    Les possibilités de dispersion et éléments d’habitat-refuge dans un paysage d’agriculture intensive fragmenté par un réseau routier dense : le cas de la petite faune dans la plaine du Bas-Rhin Jonathan Jumeau To cite this version: Jonathan Jumeau. Les possibilités de dispersion et éléments d’habitat-refuge dans un paysage d’agriculture intensive fragmenté par un réseau routier dense : le cas de la petite faune dans la plaine du Bas-Rhin. Ecosystèmes. Université de Strasbourg, 2017. Français. NNT : 2017STRAJ120. tel-01768001 HAL Id: tel-01768001 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01768001 Submitted on 16 Apr 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG ÉCOLE DOCTORALE 414 UMR7178 – UMR6553 THÈSE présentée par : Jonathan JUMEAU soutenue le : 16 octobre 2017 pour obtenir le grade de : Docteur de l’université de Strasbourg Discipline/ Spécialité : Biologie de la conservation Les possibilités de dispersion et éléments d’habitat-refuge dans un paysage d'agriculture intensive fragmenté par un réseau routier dense : le cas de la petite faune dans la plaine du Bas-Rhin THÈSE dirigée par : Dr. HANDRICH Yves Chargé de recherches, Université de Strasbourg Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles of Imbak Canyon Study Centre and Batu Timbang Camp
    Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation 16: 25–33, 2019 ISSN 1823-3902 E-ISSN 2550-1909 Short Notes Amphibians and Reptiles of Imbak Canyon Study Centre and Batu Timbang Camp Norhayati Ahmad1*, Eddie Ahmad2, Mahathir Ratag2, Edward Asrul Alimin Sinon3, Brandon Don3, Francer Francis3, Muhammad Ridzuan Mahmod3, Amshari Agimin3,Daicus Belabut4 1School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Selangor, Malaysia 2HUTAN Kinabatangan Orang-utan Conservation Programme 3Imbak Canyon Conservation Area, Kumpulan Yayasan Sabah, Jalan Sekolah Cheng Min, Peti Surat 1437, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah 4Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Amphibians and reptiles of Imbak Canyon Study Centre and Batu Timbang Camp have never been studied and this expedition was organised to produce an inventory of the species. The herpetofaunal animals were searched actively using the visual encounter survey method. A total of 84 specimens of amphibians and reptiles were obtained, comprising 75 amphibians and nine reptiles. The total number of species obtained during the expedition was 33 (26 amphibian species and 7 reptilian species). Twenty species were obtained from Batu Timbang Camp (BTC) and 21 species were recorded from Imbak Canyon Study Centre (ICSC). The updated compiled list of species of herpetofauna at ICCA is now 73 species (37 amphibian species and 36 reptilian species). Keywords: herpetofauna, frogs, lizards, geckoes, snakes, biodiversity, vertebrate Introduction Herpetofauna has the highest diversity in tropical forests around the world and is a key component in the vertebrate fauna of the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Dollar$ and Sense Longleaf Pine
    Proceedings of the Fifth Longleaf Alliance Regional Conference Longleaf Alliance Report No. 8 May 2005 LongleafLongleaf Pine:Pine: MakingMaking Dollar$Dollar$ andand SenseSense October 12 - 15, 2004 Hattiesburg Lake Terrace Convention Center Hattiesburg, Mississippi www.longleafalliance.org Longleaf Pine: Making Dollar$ and Sense Proceedings of the Fifth Longleaf Alliance Regional Conference October 12 - 15, 2004 Hattiesburg Lake Terrace Convention Center Hattiesburg, Mississippi This conference would not be possible without the financial support of the following organizations: Auburn University School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Federal Land Bank of South Mississippi International Forest Company Meeks Farm & Nurseries, Inc. Mississippi Forestry Commission Mississippi Fish & Wildlife Foundation Oak Grove Farm Simmons Tree Farm Southern LINC Southern Company Southern Mississippi Pine Straw Association US Fish & Wildlife Service USDA Forest Service The Longleaf Alliance appreciates the generous support of these organizations. Longleaf Alliance Report No. 8 May 2005 Citation: Kush, John S., comp. 2005. Longleaf Pine: Making Dollar$ and Sense, Proceedings of the Fifth Longleaf Alliance Regional Conference; 2004 October 12-15; Hattiesburg, MS. Longleaf Alliance Report No. 8. i FOREWORD Rhett Johnson, Co-Director, The Longleaf Alliance The theme of the Fifth Regional Longleaf Alliance Regional Conference was Longleaf Pine: Making Dollar$ and Sense. This theme emphasizes that longleaf makes both economic and ecological sense on public and private lands. This proceeding contains a compilation of papers and posters presented at the conference addressing specific subject matter topics involving the restoration and management of longleaf pine ecosystems to include silvicultural, ecological, social, political and economic challenges. The Fifth Longleaf Alliance Regional Conference held at Lake Terrace Convention Center in Hattiesburg, Mississippi may have been our best yet.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofauna of Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal
    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication Herpetofauna of Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal Yam Bahadur Rawat, Santosh Bhatarai, Laxman Prasad Poudyal & Naresh Subedi 26 April 2020 | Vol. 12 | No. 5 | Pages: 15587–15611 DOI: 10.11609/jot.5611.12.5.15587-15611 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher
    [Show full text]
  • Herp Lab Syllabus 2020 1-3-20
    RAT HERPETOLOGY LAB – 1-3-20 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY NEW ORLEANS HERPETOLOGY LAB - BIOL A346 - SPRING 2020 LABORATORY GUIDE Professor: Dr. Robert A. Thomas ([email protected]) Office Hours: TR 2:00-3:15pm; MW 1:00 - 2:15 pm; other times by appointment. If I’m in the office, drop in and inquire if I’m available. THE GOAL: To give you a serious and long-lasting case of herpetitis. LAB PLACE & TIME: The wet lab will be held each Friday in MO 558 from 3:30-6:20 pm. DOOR CODE: 540121 CLASS COMMUNICATION (REQUIRED): I will often communicate with the class via email. Check often (daily) or you will definitely miss important information. Not getting the messages is not a valid excuse – you snooze, you lose. Both of the following must be done by the end of the first week of classes. • CLASS LISTSERV: I have set up a class googlegroup – [email protected]. All announcements and changes as the course progresses may be shared via this googlegroup. Note: You will receive emails from me on this googlegroup only at the address you subscribe from. You may subscribe from more than one email if you wish. Don’t risk losing points by failing to pay attention to this communication system immediately. HOW DO YOU USE THE GOOGLEGROUP? To send an email to the entire class, send it to [email protected]. If you receive an email from this address, clicking <reply all> sends your reply back to the entire class (use caution!). If you hit <reply>, it goes back only to the sender (again, use caution with what you say).
    [Show full text]
  • I. General Introduction
    I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION Seasonality is the initiation-termination-reinitiation of a physiological process and is an adaptation for survival in most of the species. Amphibians are seasonal. Adult amphibians exhibit seasonal cycle in several functions including gain and loss in body weight, body fattening, parasitic load, gonadal growth and development, hormone levels, immune system and hibernation. Most of the seasonal events are centred on reproduction. David Lack (1968) defined “each species of bird has presumably evolved timing of its breeding so that it raises most offspring” and “laying is normally so timed that young are in the nest when there is enough food for them to be raised…”. Seasonality in reproduction and associated events is species specific, and is timed such that when breeding occurs plenty of preferred food is available for both parents and their offspring to make sure that chances of survival of offspring are maximum. Different environmental factors help in timing, which includes seasonal variations in day length, temperature, rainfall, humidity and vegetation (Immelmann, 1971). Baker (1938) for the first time categorised these factors into two types: the proximate and ultimate factors. Proximate factors “gate” a temporal window during the year for any seasonal event, the ultimate factors fine tunes that the actual seasonal events occur during the gated window. In most of vertebrate species to time seasonal reproduction, day length acts as the proximate factor, while 1 food/temperature acts possibly as an ultimate factor. Although the proximate and ultimate factors act in coordination, and not in isolation. In amphibians being poikilotherms temperature and rainfall may play a crucial role in timing seasonal reproduction as desiccation of pools and ponds will have severe impact on the developing tadpoles.
    [Show full text]
  • Morgan Reptile Replicas
    Morgan Reptile Replicas Price Sheet PO Box 1790-Liberty NC 27298 Phone: 336-622-1782 - Fax: 336-622-1933 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.reptilereplicas.com Item # Species Unfin Finished Fin. w/ Base Snakes Venomous MRR-25 13" Canebrake Rattler (Crotalus horridus) 27.00 185.00 235.00 MRR-26 21" Carolina Pygmy Rattler (Sistrurus miliarius miliarius) 32.00 225.00 275.00 MRR-27 14" Western Pygmy Rattler (Sistrurus miliarius streckeri) 27.00 225.00 275.00 MRR-28 21" Prairie Rattler (Crotalus viridis) 37.00 235.00 295.00 MRR-29 37" Cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) 72.00 249.00 375.00 MRR-30 34" Cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) 67.00 254.00 349.00 MRR-31 37" Cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) 57.00 243.00 325.00 MRR-32 40" Western Diamondback (Crotalus atrox) 79.00 339.00 410.00 MRR-33 44" Canebrake Rattler (Crotalus horridus) 98.00 390.00 454.00 MRR-34 50" Eastern Diamondback (Crotalus adamanteus) 110.00 399.00 456.00 MRR-35 30" Prairie Rattler (Crotalus viridis) 49.00 249.00 298.00 MRR-36 42" Eastern Diamondback (Crotalus adamanteus) 62.00 310.00 385.00 MRR-37 37" Timber Rattler (Crotalus horridus) 50.00 248.00 315.00 MRR-38 37" Eastern Coral (Micrurus fulvius) 47.00 260.00 315.00 MRR-42 37" Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix) 75.00 310.00 385.00 MRR-48 22" Rhinoceros Viper (Bitis nasicornis) 49.00 355.00 395.00 MRR-49 36" Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros) 72.00 380.00 475.00 MRR-50 13" Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros) 35.00 250.00 290.00 MRR-51 29" Puff Adder (Bitis arietans) 59.00 310.00 395.00 MRR-60 6" Copperhead
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Natural Communities and Associated Rare Plant and Animal Species: Thumbnail Accounts
    Georgia's Natural Communities and Associated Rare Plant and Animal Species: Thumbnail Accounts Written by Linda Chafin and based on "Guide to the Natural Communities of Georgia," by Leslie Edwards, Jon Ambrose, and Katherine Kirkman, 2013, University of Georgia Press. Version of 2011 Georgia Nongame Conservation Section Wildlife Resources Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources CONTENTS BLUE RIDGE ECOREGION Upland Forests of the Blue Ridge Blue Ridge northern hardwood and boulderfield forests Blue Ridge montane oak forests Blue Ridge cove forests–fertile variant Blue Ridge cove forests–acidic variant Blue Ridge low to mid-elevation oak forests Blue Ridge pine-oak woodlands Blue Ridge ultramafic barrens and woodlands Glades, Barrens, and Rock Outcrops of the Blue Ridge Ecoregion Blue Ridge rocky summits Blue Ridge cliffs Blue Ridge mafic domes, glades, and barrens Wetlands of the Blue Ridge Ecoregion Blue Ridge mountain bogs Blue Ridge seepage wetlands Blue Ridge spray cliffs Blue Ridge floodplains and bottomlands Aquatic Environments of the Blue Ridge Ecoregion Blue Ridge springs, spring runs, and seeps Blue Ridge small streams Blue Ridge medium to large rivers CUMBERLAND PLATEAU AND RIDGE & VALLEY ECOREGIONS Upland Forests of the Cumberland Plateau and Ridge & Valley Ecoregions Cumberland Plateau and Ridge & Valley mesic forests Cumberland Plateau and Ridge & Valley dry calcareous forests Cumberland Plateau and Ridge & Valley dry oak - pine - hickory forests Cumberland Plateau and Ridge & Valley pine - oak woodlands and forests
    [Show full text]