DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook of Frogs and Toads ... of the United States and Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Handbook of Frogs and Toads ... of the United States and Canada 9r;j HANDBOOK OF FROGS AND TOADS The Frogs and Toads of the United States and Canada By ANNA ALLEN WRIGHT ALBERT HAZEN WRIGHT Professor of Zoology, Cornell University Ithaca, New York The Comstock Publishing Co., Inc. 1933 COPYRIGHT, 1933. BY THE COMSTOCK PUBLISHING CO., Inc. printed in the united states of america The Cayuga Press ithaca, n.y. €§23 This little volume, meant to serve the public, the scientist, and the group treated, is dedicated to the four American women who, in addition to serving the public and science generously, have in the last half-century contributed most nota- bly to the study of this group: Mary Hewes Hinckley, 1845- Mary Cynthia Dickerson, 1 866-1 923 Helen Dean King, 1869— Helen Thompson Gaige, Preface In 1930, while preparing a monograph and also an illustrated key of North American frogs, we resolved on a small book as a guide for teachers, students, and even younger naturalists. Of each species, there is a plate of photographs from life and a two-page resume of its characters and habits. The plates and script are meant to cultivate an interest in the lay mind and help the beginner in his or her quests. Several species which since 1930 have appeared in the United States or Canada, we have been unable to illustrate, e.g., Bufo americanus copei. We have, however, attempted to illustrate all subspecies whether they be on slender or firm grounds. Pictures from life of many of these debatable forms have never been presented before. Even though it may eventually prove there is one meadow frog, yet the four forms are presented; even though only one or two forms of Pseudacris nigrita may be good, yet all five subspecies appear herein. The pictures from life may help to stimulate an elucidation of some of these moot questions in our knowledge. The photographs are largely new and not from our previous pub- lications, and are the work of the authors. In the species accounts there occasionally appears a croaker, a tadpole or an egg photograph formerly used in the Frogs of the Okefinokee Swamp. Such pictures were taken by F. Harper and the authors. Many of the frogs were photographed in a jar of water and the water line is evident on the fore part of the body or on either side of the head. While this work was going through the press, the third edition ( T 933) of Check List of North American Amphibians and Reptiles by L. Stejneger andT. Barbour appeared. The Check List indicates that the range of Hyla graciiipes extends from southern Arizona south- ward. We overlooked this statement in Dr. Kellogg's (1932) paper and this species does not appear in this work. Contents Preface viii Contents ix General account i Common names i Scientific name 2 Range 3 Habitat 3 Size 3 General appearance 4 Structure 4 Voice 5 Breeding 7 Eggs . , 7 Tadpoles 9 Development and transformation n Notes 1.2 Keys 13 Accounts of species (with a plate of each species) .... 36 Bell toads 3 6 American bell toad. Ascaphus truei 36 Spadefoots 38 Couch's spadefoot. Scaphiopus couchii 38 Hammond's spadefoot. Scaphiopus hammondii ... 40 Holbrook's spadefoot. Scaphiopus holbrookii holbrookii . 42 Key West spadefoot. Scaphiopus holbrookii a/bus (no plate) . 43 Hurter's spadefoot. Scaphiopus holbrookii hurterii (no plate) " 44 Toads 4^ Colorado River toad. Bufo alvarius 46 American toad. Bufo americanus americanus .... 48 Hudson Bay American toad. Bufo americanus copei (no plate) 49 Northwestern toad. Bufo boreas boreas 50 California toad. Bufo boreas halophilus 52 Southern California toad. Bufo californicus .... 54 Yosemite toad. Bufo canorus 56 Great Plains toad. Bufo cognatus 58 ix 1 2 4 2 i Spadefoot toad. Bufo compactilis 60 Little green toad. Bufo debilis 62 Fowler's toad. Buf fowler 64 Canadian toad. Bufo hemiophrys 66 Marine toad. Bufo marinus 68 Canyon toad. Bufo punctatus 70 Oak toad. Bufo quercicus 72 Southern toad. Bufo terrestris 74 Mexican toad. Bufo valliceps 76 Rocky Mountain toad. Bufo woodhousii 78 Cricket-frogs 80 Cricket-frog. Acris gryllus 80 Cricket-frog. Acris crepitans (no plate) 82 Chorus frogs 84 Chorus frog. Pseudacris brachyphona 84 Swamp chorus frog. Pseudacris nigrita nigrita ... 86 Clarke's striped tree frog. Pseudacris nigrita clarkii . 88 Eastern swamp cricket frog. Pseudacris nigritaferiarum . 90 Northern striped tree frog. Pseudacris nigrita septen- trionalis 92 Three striped tree frog. Pseudacris nigrita triseriata . 94 Western chorus frog. Pseudacris occidentalis (no plate) . 96 Little chorus frog. Pseudacris ocularis 98 Ornate chorus frog. Pseudacris ornata 100 Texas ornate chorus frog. Pseudacris streckeri 102 Tree frogs 104 Anderson's tree frog. Hyla andersonii 104 Canyon tree frog. Hyla arenicolor 106 Whistling tree frog. Hyla avivoca 108 Mexican tree frog. Hyla baudinii baudinii . no Green tree frog. Hyla cinerea cinerea 112 Miller's tree frog. Hyla cinerea evittata 114 Spring peeper. Hyla crucifer 116 Sonora tree frog. Hyla eximia 118 Piney woods tree frog. Hyla femoralis 120 Florida tree frog. Hyla gratiosa 122 Pacific tree frog. Hyla regilla 124 Giant tree frog. Hyla septentrionalis 126 Squirrel tree frog. Hyla squirella 128 Common tree toad. Hyla versicolor versicolor . 130 Cope's tree frog. Hyla versicolor chrysoscelis . 132 Dusky tree toad. Hyla versicolor phaeocrypta (no plate) . 134 Robber frogs 136 Mexican cliff frog. Eleutherodactylus augusti . 136 Texas cliff frog. Eleutherodactylus latrans 138 Ricord's frog. Eleutherodactylus ricordii 140 i White-lipped frog. Leptodactylus albilabris . 142 Camp's frog. Syrrhophus campi 144 Marnock's frog. Syrrhophus marnockii 146 True frogs 148 Gopher frog. Rana aesopus 148 Northern gopher frog. Rana areolata 150 Oregon red-legged frog. Rana aurora aurora . 152 California red-legged frog. Rana aurora draytonii . 154 California yellow-legged frog. Rana boylii boylit . 156 Sierra Madre yellow-legged frog. Rana boyHi muscosa . 158 Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog. Rana boylii sierrae . 160 Northern wood frog. Rana cantabrigensis 162 Bull frog. Rana catesbeiana 164 Green frog. Rana clamitans 166 Southern bull frog. Rana grylio 168 River-swamp frog. Rana heckscheri 170 Nevada frog. Rana onca 172 Pickerel frog. Rana palustris 174 Meadow frog. Rana pipiens pipiens . ... 176 Unspotted meadow frog. Rana pipiens burns . 178 Mottled meadow frog. Rana pipiens kandiyohi . 180 Western spotted frog. Rana pretiosa pretiosa . 182 Nevada spotted frog. Rana pretiosa luteiventris (no plate) 183 Mink frog. Rana septentrionalis 184 Southern meadow frog. Rana sphenocephala . 186 Wood frog. Rana sylvatica 188 Mexican frog. Rana tarahumarae 190 Carpenter frog. Rana virgatipes 192 Narrow-mouthed toads 194 Carolina narrow-mouthed toad. Gastrophryne carolinensis 1 94 Texas narrow-mouthed toad. Gastrophryne texen sis . 196 Mitchell's narrow-mouthed toad. Gastrophryne areolata (no plate) 198 Taylor's toad. Hypopachus cuneus 200 Bibliography 203 Index ^ 219 XI General Account^ In the treatment of each species, the topical outline is as follows: Common names General appearance Scientific name Structure Range Voice Habitat Breeding Size Notes Common names. We of the United States and Canada have con- cerned ourselves little with distinctive names for the amphibians. Most of the common names of the salamanders and frogs are col- lective. Just as all salamanders are generally called water dogs or lizards, so also the frogs are known by few common names, (toads, frogs or tree frogs). For example, people use the word "peeper" in- discriminately for several small frogs that call in the early spring. Others call peepers lizards. Normally we expect common names to come from the people at large, but with amphibians and reptiles, most of the common names in literature are really bookish names. Many are translations of the scientific names. The names may come from widely different sources of which the following are a few: (i) The person after whom the species is named. Example: Couch's spadefoot. Scaphiopus couchii Baird. (2) The person who named the species. Example: Viosca's tree frog. Hyla avivoca Viosca. (3) The person who first collected it. Example: Taylor's toad. Hypopachus cuneus Cope. (4) A country. Examples: Canadian toad, American bell toad, Mexican toad. (5) A state or province. Examples: Sonora hyla, Winnipeg toad, California red-legged frog. (6) Habitats. Examples: River-swamp frog, pond frog, house frog, salt marsh frog, canyon tree toad, desert tree toad, crayfish frog, gopher frog, wood frog, savanna cricket, cliff frog. (7) Habits. Examples: Chameleon tree frog, solitary spadefoot, grasshopper frog. (8) Structural characters. Examples: Ribbed toad, narrow- mouthed toad, toothless frog, femoral hyla, thick skinned frog. (9) Voice. Examples: Bell frog, screaming frog, pig frog, rattler, chorus frog, cricket frog. (10) Color. Examples: Three lined tree frog, striped tree frogs, ornate tree frog, green toad, cinereous hyla. (n) Seasons. Examples: Spring peeper, shad frog. (12) Miscellaneous sources of many kinds: Folklore. Example: Charming toad. Legend says this toad, B. terrestris, turns your eye green. Use (bait). Example: Pickerel frog. Weather signs. Example: Rain frog. Odor. Example: Mink frog. Scientific name. Any consideration of the scientific name which an animal bears implies an understanding of the scheme of classification. All living things fall into two groups or kingdoms. The plants are treated in the science of Botany, the animals in Zoology. The animal kingdom has several major subdivisions or phyla, the last being the Vertebrata (vertebrates). In the vertebrate phylum, the various classes are known as fishes (Pisces), amphibians (Amphibia), reptiles (Reptilia), birds (Aves) and mammals (Mammalia). We designate the study of fishes as Ichthyology, that of birds, Ornithology, that of mammals, Mammalogy, but we group together amphibians and reptiles as the science of Herpetology. This merging of the two groups is in a measure due to our inability to designate infallible characters of separation. A fish has fins, a bird, feathers, a mammal, hair, but reptiles and amphibians have no one positively distinctive character.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pond-Breeding Amphibian Guild
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Pond-breeding Amphibians Guild Primary Species: Flatwoods Salamander Ambystoma cingulatum Carolina Gopher Frog Rana capito capito Broad-Striped Dwarf Siren Pseudobranchus striatus striatus Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Secondary Species: Upland Chorus Frog Pseudacris feriarum -Coastal Plain only Northern Cricket Frog Acris crepitans -Coastal Plain only Contributors (2005): Stephen Bennett and Kurt A. Buhlmann [SCDNR] Reviewed and Edited (2012): Stephen Bennett (SCDNR), Kurt A. Buhlmann (SREL), and Jeff Camper (Francis Marion University) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Descriptions This guild contains 4 primary species: the flatwoods salamander, Carolina gopher frog, dwarf siren, and tiger salamander; and 2 secondary species: upland chorus frog and northern cricket frog. Primary species are high priority species that are directly tied to a unifying feature or habitat. Secondary species are priority species that may occur in, or be related to, the unifying feature at some time in their life. The flatwoods salamander—in particular, the frosted flatwoods salamander— and tiger salamander are members of the family Ambystomatidae, the mole salamanders. Both species are large; the tiger salamander is the largest terrestrial salamander in the eastern United States. The Photo by SC DNR flatwoods salamander can reach lengths of 9 to 12 cm (3.5 to 4.7 in.) as an adult. This species is dark, ranging from black to dark brown with silver-white reticulated markings (Conant and Collins 1991; Martof et al. 1980). The tiger salamander can reach lengths of 18 to 20 cm (7.1 to 7.9 in.) as an adult; maximum size is approximately 30 cm (11.8 in.).
    [Show full text]
  • Diet Composition and Overlap in a Montane Frog Community in Vietnam
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 13(1):205–215. Submitted: 5 November 2017; Accepted: 19 March 2018; Published 30 April 2018. DIET COMPOSITION AND OVERLAP IN A MONTANE FROG COMMUNITY IN VIETNAM DUONG THI THUY LE1,4, JODI J. L. ROWLEY2,3, DAO THI ANH TRAN1, THINH NGOC VO1, AND HUY DUC HOANG1 1Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Vietnam National University-HCMC, 227 Nguyen Van Cu Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum,1 William Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia 3Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia 4Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—Southeast Asia is home to a highly diverse and endemic amphibian fauna under great threat. A significant obstacle to amphibian conservation prioritization in the region is a lack of basic biological information, including the diets of amphibians. We used stomach flushing to obtain data on diet composition, feeding strategies, dietary niche breadth, and overlap of nine species from a montane forest in Langbian Plateau, southern Vietnam: Feihyla palpebralis (Vietnamese Bubble-nest Frog), Hylarana montivaga (Langbian Plateau Frog), Indosylvirana milleti (Dalat Frog), Kurixalus baliogaster (Belly-spotted Frog), Leptobrachium pullum (Vietnam Spadefoot Toad), Limnonectes poilani (Poilane’s Frog), Megophrys major (Anderson’s Spadefoot Toad), Polypedates cf. leucomystax (Common Tree Frog), and Raorchestes gryllus (Langbian bubble-nest Frog). To assess food selectivity of these species, we sampled available prey in their environment. We classified prey items into 31 taxonomic groups. Blattodea was the dominant prey taxon for K.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians in Zootaxa: 20 Years Documenting the Global Diversity of Frogs, Salamanders, and Caecilians
    Zootaxa 4979 (1): 057–069 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Review ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:972DCE44-4345-42E8-A3BC-9B8FD7F61E88 Amphibians in Zootaxa: 20 years documenting the global diversity of frogs, salamanders, and caecilians MAURICIO RIVERA-CORREA1*+, DIEGO BALDO2*+, FLORENCIA VERA CANDIOTI3, VICTOR GOYANNES DILL ORRICO4, DAVID C. BLACKBURN5, SANTIAGO CASTROVIEJO-FISHER6, KIN ONN CHAN7, PRISCILLA GAMBALE8, DAVID J. GOWER9, EVAN S.H. QUAH10, JODI J. L. ROWLEY11, EVAN TWOMEY12 & MIGUEL VENCES13 1Grupo Herpetológico de Antioquia - GHA and Semillero de Investigación en Biodiversidad - BIO, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-5480 2Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Instituto de Biología Subtropical (CONICET-UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-0872 3Unidad Ejecutora Lillo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Fundación Miguel Lillo, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina [email protected]; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-9951 4Laboratório de Herpetologia Tropical, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Rodovia Jorge Amado Km 16 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brasil [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-4006 5Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-9886 6Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Amphibian Community Monitoring at Canaveral National Seashore, 2009
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Summary of Amphibian Community Monitoring at Canaveral National Seashore, 2009 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2010/098 ON THE COVER Clockwise from top left, Hyla chrysoscelis (Cope’s grey treefrog), Hyla gratiosa (barking treefrog), Scaphiopus holbrookii (Eastern spadefoot), and Hyla cinerea (Green treefrog). Photographs by J.D. Willson. Summary of Amphibian Community Monitoring at Canaveral National Seashore, 2009 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2010/098 Michael W. Byrne, Laura M. Elston, Briana D. Smrekar, Brent A. Blankley, and Piper A. Bazemore USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia, 31558 October 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Distribution and Conservation Status of Amphibian
    Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science Vol.7 (1):1-25 2014 Review Article Distribution and conservation status of amphibian and reptile species in the Lacandona rainforest, Mexico: an update after 20 years of research Omar Hernández-Ordóñez1, 2, *, Miguel Martínez-Ramos2, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez2, Adriana González-Hernández3, Arturo González-Zamora4, Diego A. Zárate2 and, Víctor Hugo Reynoso3 1Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Av. Universidad 3000, C.P. 04360, Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico. 2 Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro No. 8701, Ex Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, 58190 Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico. 3Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. 4División de Posgrado, Instituto de Ecología A.C. Km. 2.5 Camino antiguo a Coatepec No. 351, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico. * Corresponding author: Omar Hernández Ordóñez, email: [email protected] Abstract Mexico has one of the richest tropical forests, but is also one of the most deforested in Mesoamerica. Species lists updates and accurate information on the geographic distribution of species are necessary for baseline studies in ecology and conservation of these sites. Here, we present an updated list of the diversity of amphibians and reptiles in the Lacandona region, and actualized information on their distribution and conservation status. Although some studies have discussed the amphibians and reptiles of the Lacandona, most herpetological lists came from the northern part of the region, and there are no confirmed records for many of the species assumed to live in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • American Toad (Anaxyrus Americanus) Fowler's Toad (Anaxyrus Fowleri
    Vermont has eleven known breeding species of frogs. Their exact distributions are still being determined. In order for these species to survive and flourish, they need our help. One way you can help is to report the frogs that you come across in the state. Include in your report as much detail as you can on the appearance and location of the animal; also include the date of the sighting, your name, and how to contact you. Photographs are ideal, but not necessary. When attempting to identify a particular species, check at least three different field markings so that you can be sure of what it is. To contribute a report, you may use our website (www.vtherpatlas.org) or contact Jim Andrews directly at [email protected]. American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) American Toad (Anaxyrus americanus) The American Bullfrog is our largest frog and can reach 7 inches long. The Bullfrog is one of the three The American Toad is one of Vermont’s two toad species. Toads can be distinguished from other green-faced frogs in Vermont. It has a green and brown mottled body with dark stripes across its legs. frogs in Vermont by their dry and bumpy skin, and the long oval parotoid glands on each side of their The Bullfrog does not have dorsolateral ridges, but it does have a ridge that starts at the eye and goes necks. The American Toad has at least one large wart in each of the large black spots found along its around the eardrum (tympana) and down. The Bullfrog’s call is a deep low jum-a-rum.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians
    Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians Compiled by Terbish, Kh., Munkhbayar, Kh., Clark, E.L., Munkhbat, J. and Monks, E.M. Edited by Munkhbaatar, M., Baillie, J.E.M., Borkin, L., Batsaikhan, N., Samiya, R. and Semenov, D.V. ERSITY O IV F N E U D U E T C A A T T S I O E N H T M ONGOLIA THE WORLD BANK i ii This publication has been funded by the World Bank’s Netherlands-Mongolia Trust Fund for Environmental Reform. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colours, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) have contributed to the production of the Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians, providing technical support, staff time, and data. IUCN supports the production of the Summary Conservation Action Plans for Mongolian Reptiles and Amphibians, but the information contained in this document does not necessarily represent the views of IUCN. Published by: Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY Copyright: © Zoological Society of London and contributors 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhinella Marina) on Sanibel Island, FL
    Possible Introduction Mechanisms, Movement Patterns, and Control Efforts of the Giant Toad (Rhinella marina) on Sanibel Island, FL Chris Lechowicz Director-Wildlife Habitat Management Program/Herpetologist Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation Giant Toad (Rhinella marina) • Also called the cane toad, marine toad, Bufo toad, faux toad. • Previously Bufo marinus • Native to Central America, South America, Mexico, and south Texas. • A true toad (Family Bufonidae) belonging to a group of Neotropical toads (beaked toads = Rhinella). • Largest Bufonid toad (up to 5.8 lb), but not the largest Anuran (frog) in the world. Notable Facts • They have very large paired parotoid glands containing Bufotoxin that is oozed out when harassed. • This milky toxin has killed household pets (dogs, cats) and numerous wildlife species when ingested. • There has been documented human fatalities from “toad- licking” and ingestion. • Eggs/larvae are toxic to wildlife. • Highly nocturnal Prey and Predators • They consume invertebrates, small rodents, birds, amphibians, reptiles , and plants. • They will eat non-living prey (small dead animals, dog and food, feces). • The are preyed on in their natural range by caimans (C. latirostris), certain species of fish, Possums (Didelphis species), meat ants, banded cat-eyed snake (Leptodeira annulata), and some species of ibis. • They can lay up to ~30,000 eggs a year. Current uses for Cane Toads • Educational purposes (the dangers of exotic species) • Pregnancy tests • Leather goods • Pet trade • Eaten in Peru (after
    [Show full text]
  • A Supplemental Bibliography of Herpetology in New Mexico
    A Supplemental Bibliography of Herpetology in New Mexico --- Revised: 1 September 2005 --- Compiled by: James N. Stuart New Mexico Department of Game & Fish Conservation Services Division P.O. Box 25112 , Santa Fe, NM 87504-5112 and Curatorial Associate (Amphibians & Reptiles) Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico E-mail: [email protected] This document may be cited as: Stuart, J.N. 2005. A Supplemental Bibliography of Herpetology in New Mexico. Web publication (Revised: 1 September 2005): http://www.msb.unm.edu/herpetology/publications/stuart_supl_biblio.pdf Contents Section 1: Introduction and Acknowledgments Section 2: Alphabetical List of References Section 3: Index of References by Taxon or General Topic Appendix A: List of Standard English and Current Scientific Names for Amphibians and Reptiles of New Mexico Appendix B: List of State and Federally Protected Herpetofauna in New Mexico Section 1: Introduction and Acknowledgments The publication of Amphibians and Reptiles of New Mexico by W.G. Degenhardt, C.W. Painter, and A.H. Price in 1996 provided the first comprehensive review of the herpetofauna in New Mexico. Approximately 1,600 references were cited in the book and yet, as is the nature of scientific research, additional information continues to be published on the amphibian and reptile populations of this state. This supplemental bibliography was created to build on the information in Degenhardt et al. by compiling all pertinent references not included in their 1996 book or in their corrigenda to the book (Price et al. 1996). References include both peer-reviewed and non-reviewed (e.g., “gray literature”) sources such as journal and magazine articles, books, book chapters, symposium proceedings, doctoral dissertations, master’s theses, unpublished agency and contract reports, and on-line Web publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Eastern Population of The
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Eastern Population of the Boreal Toad, Anaxyrus boreas boreas Prepared by the Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment (SSA) reports the results of the comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Eastern Population of the boreal toad (Anaxyrus boreas boreas) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and, therefore, extinction risk. The boreal toad is a subspecies of the western toad (Anaxyrus boreas, formerly Bufo boreas). The Eastern Population of the boreal toad occurs in southeastern Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, northern New Mexico, and most of Utah. This SSA Report is intended to provide the best available biological information to inform a 12-month finding and decision on whether or not the Eastern Population of boreal toad is warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act (Act), and if so, whether and where to propose designating critical habitat. To evaluate the biological status of the boreal toad both currently and into the future, we assessed a range of conditions to allow us to consider the species’ resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). The boreal toad needs multiple resilient populations widely distributed across its range to maintain its persistence into the future and to avoid extinction. A number of factors influence whether boreal toad populations are considered resilient to stochastic events. These factors include (1) sufficient population size (abundance), (2) recruitment of toads into the population, as evidenced by the presence of all life stages at some point during the year, and (3) connectivity between breeding populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bears Ears National Monument Proclamation
    THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release December 28, 2016 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BEARS EARS NATIONAL MONUMENT - - - - - - - BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION Rising from the center of the southeastern Utah landscape and visible from every direction are twin buttes so distinctive that in each of the native languages of the region their name is the same: Hoon'Naqvut, Shash Jáa, Kwiyagatu Nukavachi, Ansh An Lashokdiwe, or "Bears Ears." For hundreds of generations, native peoples lived in the surrounding deep sandstone canyons, desert mesas, and meadow mountaintops, which constitute one of the densest and most significant cultural landscapes in the United States. Abundant rock art, ancient cliff dwellings, ceremonial sites, and countless other artifacts provide an extraordinary archaeological and cultural record that is important to us all, but most notably the land is profoundly sacred to many Native American tribes, including the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah Ouray, Hopi Nation, and Zuni Tribe. The area's human history is as vibrant and diverse as the ruggedly beautiful landscape. From the earliest occupation, native peoples left traces of their presence. Clovis people hunted among the cliffs and canyons of Cedar Mesa as early as 13,000 years ago, leaving behind tools and projectile points in places like the Lime Ridge Clovis Site, one of the oldest known archaeological sites in Utah. Archaeologists believe that these early people hunted mammoths, ground sloths, and other now-extinct megafauna, a narrative echoed by native creation stories. Hunters and gatherers continued to live in this region in the Archaic Period, with sites dating as far back as 8,500 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoparasites of Various Species of Anurans in Penang Island, Peninsular Malaysia
    ENDOPARASITES OF VARIOUS SPECIES OF ANURANS IN PENANG ISLAND, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA ZATIL SHAKINAH BINTI ABDULLAH UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 2013 ENDOPARASITES OF VARIOUS SPECIES OF ANURANS IN PENANG ISLAND, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA by ZATIL SHAKINAH BINTI ABDULLAH Thesis submitted is fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science April 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praises to Allah S.W.T., The Most Merciful and The Most Gracious that always give hope and best way for me even in my hardest situation, Allah S.W.T always guide me. I would like to gratitude for all the people that supported me until finished this thesis. First of all I would like to express the deepest appreciation to my main supervisor Professor Abdul Wahab bin Abdul Rahman for his guidance, advises, moral support, and willingness to spend time in spite of their busy schedule for discussion through this study. Also a big thank to my co-supervisor Prof. Madya Dr. Zary Shariman bin Yahaya for his advises and encouragements. I would also like to thank to Encik Faizal as my field assistant from Zoology laboratory in helping me during fieldwork. I thank to Institute Postgraduate Siswazah Universiti Sains Malaysia for giving me some grant for conducting my research. I also thank to Dr. Krishnasamy from Medical Research Institute for helping me in process of identification on parasites. I would like to say thank you to Ministry of Higher Education for sponsor me MyMaster to support my postgraduate study in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Deepest thankful to my mother, my father, my husband, my sisters, my brothers, my grandparents and also my auntie for all their support, encourage, and for always pray for me.
    [Show full text]