Lalit Modi Replyto: Digvijay Singh Subject: RE; Theatrical Rights Sent: Mar 4, 2A09 22T58 Sundar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
From: Fordham, Michael <[email protected]> To: Wldblood, Andrelt/ <Andrer,t/.\Mldblood@irngworld,com>; [email protected] <lkrmdi@aol,com>i Griffiths, Peter <Peter.Griff [email protected] ; SundarRaman <[email protected]> cc: Loffhagen, John <[email protected]; Bcci Aol <[email protected]>; Manning, Paul <[email protected]> Subject: RE: IPL related issues Date: Wed, Jan 21, 2009 3:38 pm The name of the person at PVR was Gautam Dutta (Marketing Director). I will set up another meeting with him. From: Wildblood. Andrew Sent: 21 January 2009 10:04 To: [email protected]; Grifriths, Peter; Sundar Raman Cc: Lofihagen. John; Boci Aol; Fordham, Midlael; Manning, Paul Subject! RE: IPL related issues Dear LaI it, We wiL.1 get across these three issues riqht away. P]ease see init-ia.L co(unents beLor.r. -----Original Messaqe----- From: lalit modi lrnailtoi LkmodiGaol.com] Sent: 21 January 2009 03:50 To: Wifdb.Lood, Andrew; criffiths, Peter; Sundar Raman .-^. r.^f fhadar .r^hn. R..i Aol Srrhitr/-f . TPT, rr'l ,ited i ssues Dear Andrer,r The IP], season is around the corner and as such there are a few things we need Lo resolve asap lrhich are eiLher oulsLanding o-r need cornpLetion. 1. In regard to our conversation abouL fPL Lheatrical riqhts, I had menLioned to you to leave the same aLone as I was in advance conversation with Sony on lhe sane. on further reflection f befieve its not in Bcci and TPLrs best interest to have all its eggs in one basket, From now on we should broadbase our partners, Therefore you have the Go ahead to get offers for theatrical Rights with the companies that have approached us for the same. We can do gl-obal deal with who ever is ready to give us best deal asap. AW-Mike had a meetinq with Rajesh Sawhney at Reliance. This was the meeting at which Sawhney asserted that 1) they are already included in the Big TV official Partner deal, and 2) the rights have no value. Mike then had a meeting pfanned with xxx at PVR which was cancelled folfowing our conversation re Sony. Mike is back in India next week and will reinstate this meeting, The question then is how do we handle Reliance. Has the Official Partne.r discussion cornpfetely broken down. is Anil Ambani aware of the situat ion ? 2. Sony Distribution - this remains a great concern Lo us especially in souto. Pfease irunediately Look into this and advise whether they have thee requisite distribution across the country or not. I woufd need you to present me detaifed analysis at the Governing Council meeting on the sth of Feb for us to take a view on the same. It is irnperative that the same is not like last year and we will need to ascertain the same. AW-We wilf do the necessarv checkinq on the sane 3. Sony - has been jeopardising our negotlations with regards to closure of our tender with Big Tv, We have written to them to ensure they do not cfose any deal lilth Airtel-. but Airtef has informed us that they have closed. Please investigate the same and.report the same to us asap so we can take appropriale action. AW-I will look into this, Paul please provide ne with the background paperwork. Please treat these as most urgent. WilI do '. Warm rega.rds Lalit Modi Chairman and Commissloner I P],. Sent from my BlackBerry@ e.rire.Less device The preceding e-mail messaqe (incfuding any attachments) contains .info.rrnation that may be conf.idenLia.l, may be protected h1, tha at r^rhAtr-^l ianf r^hl i^.1-1la ^r ^+h6r ^.ivilA^a< constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designaLed recipienL (s) named above. If you are not rh i anda.l rA^ihi6n+ +hie h^fi f17 fha ean.lar ^l ^f ^larcA hw rohl rrihd t^ fhi< mA<<rda rnrl thah dalata:11 .^nio< it ^f from your conputer system. Any use. d.issemlnatlon, distribution. or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unfalrfuf. Webnnil :: ITT for theaterical rights Subject ITT for theaterical rights Sender [email protected] <[email protected] > r*#s*lk€ Reciplent Venu Nair <venu. [email protected] > coPy Lalit Modi <[email protected]>, Michael Fordham < Michael. Fordham @imgworld.com > Dat€ 16.02.2009 13:02 Dear venu, Refer our discuss ions regarding Lhe -tPL Theatrical rights. In line with the BCCI practice. we vJill be issuinq an T'I.I f^r ihie Fidhr- a^^n I look forward to Your continued interes! in the theatrical rights. Sundar Sent from BlackBerry@ on Airtel I of I Webnrail :: Fw: Theatical Rights subject Fw: Theatrical Rights Sender [email protected] <[email protected]> Fra* |{t*{!d! lar $* rqd*a{i& Re€ipient LalitModi <lkm@iplt2o,com> Date 25.02.2009 20:36 . d20090224 pm (Cinema Rights ITT)V4 CLEAN.doc (318 KB) Noticed some changed were required. Have done it in this. Kindly refer to this. Sent from BlackBerry@ on Airtel From: "Manning, Paul' Date: wed. 25 Feb 2009 14:58:03 +0000 To: Sundar< [email protected] > Subiect: RE: Theatrical Rights Hi Sunda r Payment 14 days prior to the first match at 4.2. US$2m performance deposit at 7.1 Bank guarantee included at 7.2 l've tidied one or two other points too. Best regards Paul From: Sundar Imailto:[email protected]] Sent: 25 February 2OO9 L4:32 To: Manning. Paul Subject: RE: Theatrical Rights The performance deposit is USD 2lv1n right? We need to include a bank guarantee. I had that added, if I remember. Yes Licence fee to be paid in full no later than 14 days. From: Manning, Paul [mailto: PManning@csi-sports. net] Sent: 25 February 2OO9 l9:4L To3 Sundar Subj€ct: RE: Theatrical Rights HiSundar On eligibility we have fit and proper person and no bids from entities in default of a contract with BCCI or associated with a company that is in default. The additional eligibility criteria in the media rights iTT were that bidders had to be Broadcasters or sports marketing agencies and minimum financial standing, neither of which helps with the party mentioned. We have not included a bank guarantee - as a one season deal is this necessary. We do have a performance deposit - but that is only two dollars. Unless this is just formality to ensure consideration has passed, this should be increased. Shall we stipulate that the licence fee must be paid in full by no later than 14 days prior to the first match? Cheers. Paul I of 2 Subject Theatrlcal Rights ^ Sender Sundar <[email protected] > rsH*#s#ktf Recipient [email protected] < lkm@iplt20. com> copy Manning, Paul < PManning@csi-sports. net> Date 25.O2.2OO9 r9t20 . ITT iPL Theatrical Rights 2009 - Mark up.doc (317 KB) . ITT IPL Theatrical Rights 2009.doc (315 KB) Clean and marked-up copy attached... Key highlights... Reserve price of USD 2Mn for Global rights . Bankguarantee of USD 2mn . Joint bids allowed . We will give the world feed signal back of truck to them . They will have to give first right of sponsorship to IPL ground partners ' NO virtual gra phics a llowed at any time d uring the telecast - no pull through, sq ueezes etc etc. Licensee gets first right to negotiate for 1 month period for 2010 season onwards Currently we haven't kept any restrictions for bidders - except for entities in dispute with ECC| (to exclude Zee). Sundar l of I Webnrail :: Re: Theatical Rights Subj€ct Re: Theatrical Rights Sender [email protected] <[email protected] > rs#*HkS Recipient Digvijay Singh <[email protected]. in >, Radhika Moolraj < bccimarketing@aol. com >, Lalit Modi < [email protected] > Dat€ 04.03.2009 23:16 Di gsv, The qualification and eligibility criteria is deLailed in the 1TT. In your opinion if you meet them, you should consider yourself eliqible and qualified. we will ascertain that only when we open envelope A. Reqards Sundar. ___---/.\, i ^i nr l To: Sundar Raman To: Radhika Moolraj To: Lalit Modi ReplyTo: Digvijay Singh subject: RE; Theatrical Rights Sent: Mar 4, 2A09 22t58 Sundar, I am confused, Does this mean that you consider Nimlcus eliqible, qualified and welcome to address this enquiry? Digvijay singh -----n,i di n: l M6<<ana----- From, !!I!4lje]f?!-,jgg Irnailto : sundar Q i p ] t 2 0 . corn l Sentr 04 Maich 2009 22:53 To: Radhika Mooliaj; Lalit Modi subject: Theatrical Riqhts A1I, we have considered you! requests regarding e:<tension for submlssion of the tender. The date for submission is nor{ extended from the 6th March to l2noon on the 12th March, 2009. Regards sundar sent from BlackBerryR on Airtel Sent from BfackBerry@ on Airtel l of I Webnnil :: Theatrical Rights Subject Theatrical Rights gmor::ks Sender [email protected] <[email protected] > Recipient Radhika Moolraj < [email protected] >, Lalit Modi < [email protected] > Date 04.03.2009 22:53 Att, we have considered your requests regarding extension for submission of the tender. The date for submission is now extended from the 6th March to 12noon on the 12th March, 2009 . Rega!ds sundar Sent from BlackBerry@ on Airtel lotl Subject Various Sender Sundar <[email protected]> **#sk€ Recapaent Lkm ipl < [email protected] > Date 07.03.2009 20:45 Dear Lalit, Need your views and approvals on the following... r. Ogilvy and groupm Have told groupm 2olo coffimission. Worst case will settle at2.5o/o (vs last year net realised was 4.5olo for them).