DOCSLIB.ORG

Revised Draft Subwatersheds Wastewater Plan Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revised Draft Subwatersheds Wastewater Plan Executive Summary REVISED DRAFT SUBWATERSHEDS WASTEWATER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “We are in a county that will no longer allow our water quality crisis to go unaddressed, but will come together to Reclaim Our Water” Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone 2014 State of the County Suffolk County Department of Health Services August 2019 This document was prepared with funding provided by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation as part of the Long Island Nitrogen Action Plan and by New York State Department of State under the Environmental Protection Fund. Subwatersheds Wastewater Plan • Executive Summary Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Wastewater Management in Suffolk County ........................................................................................ 7 1.3 Innovative/Alternative Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems ................................................ 9 1.4 Sewage Treatment Plants and Sewering ............................................................................................ 13 1.4.1 Sewer Expansion Projects ........................................................................................................... 14 2.0 SWP Development .................................................................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Stakeholder Participation ......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Quality Assurance Project Plans ............................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Subwatershed Identification .................................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Groundwater Modeling .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.5 Nitrogen Load Estimation Methodology ............................................................................................. 22 2.5.1 Nitrogen Load from Sanitary Wastewater ........................................................................... 123 2.5.2 Nitrogen Load from Fertilizer ................................................................................................... 24 2.5.3 Nitrogen Load from Animal Waste .......................................................................................... 25 2.5.4 Nitrogen Load from Atmospheric Deposition .................................................................... 25 2.6 Existing Conditions Nitrogen Load Estimates .................................................................................. 25 2.6.1 Simulated Nitrogen Concentrations under Existing Conditions ................................. 26 2.6.2 Simulated Nitrogen Loads to Surface Waters ..................................................................... 26 2.6.3 Simulated Nitrogen Concentrations in Community Supply Wells ............................. 30 2.7 Subwatershed Characterization and Ranking .................................................................................. 31 2.7.1 Water Quality Database Development ................................................................................... 31 2.7.2 Surface Water Modeling and Residence Time Calculation ............................................ 32 2.7.3 Subwatershed Ranking Approach ........................................................................................... 33 2.8 Ecological Endpoints and Nitrogen Load Reduction Goals ......................................................... 40 2.8.1 Ecological Endpoint Identification .......................................................................................... 42 2.8.2 Nitrogen Load Reduction Goals ................................................................................................ 42 2.8.3 Reference Water Body Approach for Marine/Mixed Water Bodies.......................... 43 2.8.4 Stress-Response Relationship Approach for Mixed/Marine Water Bodies ........... 45 2.8.5 Comparison to Existing Guidance and Literature Values .............................................. 47 2.8.6 Nitrogen Load Reduction Goal Approach for Fresh Water Bodies and Coastal Ponds ............................................................................................................................................................... 47 2.8.7 Summary of Recommended Subwatershed-Specific Nitrogen Load Reduction Goals ............................................................................................................................................................................ 48 2.9 Wastewater Management Areas for Nitrogen Load Reduction to Surface Waters .......... 48 2.10 Near Shore Areas ........................................................................................................................................ 51 2.11 Groundwater and Drinking Water Priority Areas ........................................................................ 51 2.12 Integrated Subwatersheds Wastewater Priority Map ............................................................... 53 3.0 Evaluation of Wastewater Management Methods .................................................................................... 54 3.1 Alternative Cost-Benefit Analysis .......................................................................................................... 56 3.2 Geographic Cost-Benefit Considerations ........................................................................................... 57 ES -1 Subwatersheds Wastewater Plan • Executive Summary 3.3 Pilot Area Evaluations ................................................................................................................................. 59 3.4 Countywide I/A OWTS Alternatives Evaluation .............................................................................. 62 3.5 Sewering and Clustering Alternatives Evaluation .......................................................................... 65 3.5.1 Inventory of Existing Sewer Proposals in Suffolk County ............................................ 68 3.5.2 Wastewater Management Response Evaluation .............................................................. 69 3.5.3 Sewer Scenario Evaluation Findings and Recommendations ..................................... 69 3.6 Nitrogen Mitigation for Groundwater and Drinking Water Restoration and Protection 3.7 Summary of Overall Recommended Wastewater Management Strategy ............................ 7472 4.0 Predicted Benefits of SWP Implementation ................................................................................................ 75 4.1 Predicted Benefits of SWP Implementation on Surface Waters ............................................... 77 4.2 Predicted Benefits of SWP Implementation on Groundwater and Drinking Water ......... 79 5.0 Summary of SWP Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 82 5.1 Primary Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 83 5.1.1 Recommended Revisions to the Suffolk County Sanitary Code ................................. 83 5.1.2 Detailed Recommendations for Phase I – Program Ramp Up ..................................... 84 5.2 Other Program Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 85 5.2.1 OSDS Upgrade Requirements for Home Elevation .......................................................... 86 5.2.2 Initial Recommendations to Address Contaminants of Emerging Concern ......... 86 5.2.3 Initial Recommendations to Address Sea Level Rise ...................................................... 86 5.2.4 Initial Recommendations to Address Phosphorus........................................................... 87 5.2.5 Initial Recommendations to Address Pathogens .............................................................. 89 5.2.6 Initial Recommendations to Address Upzoning................................................................ 89 5.2.7 Initial Recommendations to Address Open Space ........................................................... 89 5.2.8 Initial Recommendations to Address Transfer of Development Rights ................. 90 5.2.9 Initial Recommendations to Address Legacy Nitrogen and Other Nitrogen Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................................. 90 ........................................................................................................................................................................... 91 5.3 Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan ..................................................................................... 91 6.0 Recommendations for Further Evaluations ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy Long Island SOUTH SHORE ESTUARY RESERVE
    Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy New York Suffolk Nassau Long Island SOUTH SHORE ESTUARY RESERVE Open-File Report 2017–1161 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. The Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve (orange) stretches west to east from the Nassau-Queens county line to the town of Southampton. South to north, it extends from mean high tide on the ocean side of the barrier islands to the inland limits of the watersheds that drain into the bays. Image courtesy of the New York State Department of State Office of Planning, Development and Community Infrastructure. Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Coordinated Water Resources Monitoring Strategy By Shawn C. Fisher, Robert J. Welk, and Jason S. Finkelstein Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Department of State Office of Planning, Development and Community Infrastructure and the South Shore Estuary Reserve Office Open-File Report 2017–1161 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Capital Evidence Compendium for Norfolk and Suffolk October 2020
    Introduction Regional Context Asset Inventory Risk Review Implications References Natural Capital Evidence Compendium for Norfolk and Suffolk October 2020 Asset Inventory Land Soil & Sub-Surface Habitats & Species Freshwater Coast & Marine Atmosphere : 30oct20_FINAL Photos: Trudie Dockerty UEA unless otherwise stated. Introduction Regional Context Asset Inventory Risk Review Implications References About this compendium The counties of Norfolk and Suffolk have stewardship of a wealth of natural assets. The purpose of this Evidence Compendium is to present information about these assets and the potential risks to them, to provide an element of the preparatory work that will feed into a Norfolk & Suffolk 25 Year Environment Plan. Where possible, data is provided by county and also for five important natural areas within them: the Norfolk Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Suffolk Coasts & Heaths AONB, plus The Broads National Park, The Brecks and the Dedham Vale AONB. (These are termed ‘key natural areas’ throughout this compendium). The Introduction section outlines the scope of the work and the approach taken. This is followed with background information regarding the environmental and socio-economic setting of the two counties to provide some Regional Context. A key part of the work is a Natural Asset Inventory for Norfolk and Suffolk which is presented in six sections - Land Soil & Sub-Surface Habitats & Species Freshwater Coast & Marine Atmosphere This is followed by an examination of the current and future risks to these assets, presented in a Risk Review, with a synthesis of the Implications and outline of Priorities and next steps for the proposed Norfolk & Suffolk 25 Year Environment Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Carmans, Patchogue, and Swan Rivers
    Estuaries and Coasts: J CERF DOI 10.1007/s12237-007-9010-y Temporal and Spatial Variations in Water Quality on New York South Shore Estuary Tributaries: Carmans, Patchogue, and Swan Rivers Lori Zaikowski & Kevin T. McDonnell & Robert F. Rockwell & Fred Rispoli Received: 9 April 2007 /Revised: 23 August 2007 /Accepted: 14 September 2007 # Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2007 Abstract The chemical and biological impacts of anthro- magnitude higher than SR and CR sediments. Benthic pogenic physical modifications (i.e., channelization, dredg- invertebrate assessment of species richness, biotic index, ing, bulkhead, and jetty construction) to tributaries were and Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera richness assessed on New York’s Long Island South Shore Estuary. indicated that PR was severely impacted, SR ranged from Water-quality data collected on Carmans, Patchogue, and slightly to severely impacted, and CR ranged from non- Swan Rivers from 1997 to 2005 indicate no significant impacted to slightly impacted. Diversity and abundance of differences in nutrient levels, temperature, or pH among the plankton were comparable on SR and CR, and were rivers, but significant differences in light transmittance, significantly higher than on PR. The data indicate that dissolved oxygen (DO), salinity, and sediments were nutrients do not play a major role in hypoxia in these observed. Patchogue River (PR) and Swan River (SR) were estuarine tributaries but that physical forces dominate. The significantly more saline than Carmans River (CR), PR and narrow inlets, channelization, and abrupt changes in depth SR had less light transmittance than CR, and both exhibited near the inlets of PR and SR foster hypoxic conditions by severe warm season hypoxia.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 13, Chamberlayne Road, Moreton Hall, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 7EY
    Unit 13, Chamberlayne Road, Moreton Hall, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 7EY TRADE COUNTER/LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN AN ESTABLISHED TRADE LOCATION • Net internal area of approximately 256.96 sq m (2,766 sq ft) • Ideal for trade counter, storage, light industrial or other commercial uses • Open plan warehouse with integral offices • Front forecourt with demised car parking for circa five cars • Convenient access to A14 and 2 miles east of Bury St Edmunds Town centre • Close to main car dealers, trade counters, builders merchants & retail warehouses LOCATION RENT Chamberlayne Road is accessed directly from £25,000 per annum. Bedingfield Road, the main arterial access to the Moreton Hall Industrial Estate, Suffolk VAT Business Park and Moreton Hall residential All figures quoted are subject to VAT at the development. The property is ideally situated prevailing rate. approximately 2 miles east of Bury St Edmunds town centre and within close proximity to RATING Junction 44 of the A14. Unit 13 is listed in the 2017 Ratings List under ‘warehouse and premises’ and has a rateable The Moreton Hall area is regarded as Bury St value of £19,670. Edmunds primary business and out-of-town commercial location with a large number of ESTATES CHARGE retail warehouse, trade counter and motor The tenant will be required to contribute to the dealership operators, as well as office, estate charge. The annual contribution is warehouse and light industrial occupiers. based on 3% of the passing rent. DESCRIPTION ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE Chamberlayne Road comprises a cul-de-sac A full copy of the EPC is available on request.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk County Council Transport Mitigation Strategy for the Ipswich Strategic Planning Area
    Suffolk County Council Transport Mitigation Strategy for the Ipswich Strategic Planning Area August 2019 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 2. APPROACH ................................................................................................................... 7 3. ADJUSTMENT METHODOLOGY .................................................................................. 9 2026 and 2036 results.................................................................................................. 12 4. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 17 4.2. Demographics from The State of Suffolk Report 2019 ...................................... 17 4.3. Future of Travel Demand Report ....................................................................... 19 4.4 Department for Transport – review of national trends in commuting (2017) ....... 19 4.5 Transport for quality of life ................................................................................. 21 4.6 Sustrans & Arup (2019) Review of Bike Life ...................................................... 22 4.7 Natural modal shift ............................................................................................ 23 4.8 Summary ........................................................................................................... 23 5 MITIGATION APPROACH ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WHOI-R-93-006 Anderson, D.M. an Immunof
    J ournal of Plankton Research Vo1.15 no.5 pp.563-580, 1993 An immunofluorescent survey of the brown tide chrysophyte A ureococcus anophagefferens along the northeast coast of the United States Donald M.Anderson, Bruce A.Keafer, David M.Kulis, Robert M.Waters 1 and Robert Nuzzi 1 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Biology Department, Woods Hole, MA 02543 and 1 Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Evans K. Griffing County Center, Riverhead, NY JJ 901, USA Abst ract. Surveys were conducted along the northeast coast of the USA, be1ween Po rtsmouth, NH, and I he Chesapeake Bay in 1988 and 1990, to determine the population distribulion of Aureococcus anoplwgefferens, lhe chrysophyte responsible for massive and destructive 'brown tides' in Long Island and Narraganselt Bay beginning in 1985. A species-specific immunofluorescent technique was used to screen water samples, with positive identification possible at cell concentrations as low as 10- 1 20 cells ml - • Bolh years, A.anophagefferens was detected at numerous stations in and around Long Island and Barnegat Bay, J , typically at high cell concentrations. To the north and south of this 'center·, nearly half of the remaining stations were positive for A.anophagefferens, but the cells were always at very low cell concentrations. Many of the positive identifications in areas distant from Long Island were in waters with no known history of harmful brown tides. The species was present in both open coastal and estuarine locations, in salinities between 18 and 32 prac1ical salinity units (PSU). The observed population distributions apparently still reflect the massive 1985 outbreak when this species first bloomed, given the number of positive locations and high abundance of A.anophagef­ ferens in the immediate vicinity of Long Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4. County Profile
    Section 4: County Profile Section 4. County Profile Profile information is presented and analyzed to develop an understanding of a study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed later in this plan (e.g., significant coastal areas or low lying areas prone to flooding or a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). This profile describes the general information of the County (government, physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within Suffolk County. 4.1 General Information Suffolk County was established on November 1, 1683, as one of the ten original counties in New York State. Suffolk County was named after the county of Suffolk in England, from where many of its earliest settlers originated (Suffolk County Department of Planning, 2005). Suffolk County’s western border is approximately 15 miles from the eastern border of New York City. According to the U.S. Census data, the Suffolk County estimated population in 2012 was 1,499,273. Suffolk County is one of the 57 counties in New York State and is comprised of 10 towns and 31 incorporated villages. Within each town and village, there are incorporated and unincorporated areas (Suffolk County Department of Planning, 2007). The population of Suffolk County is larger than ten states and ranks as the 24th most populated county in the country (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012). Suffolk County is bordered by Nassau County to the west and major water bodies to the north, south, and east.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Waters Contributing Areas
    Fishers Island Sound Legend SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Suffolk County Land Use PriorityUnsewered - 1* Residential*** Huntington Long Island Sound Bay PriorityUnsewered - 2* Residential*** Lloyd Harbor Rd Long Island Sound Baseflowyear 0-2 Con tributingAreas to SurfaceWaters, d r R Main Rd e 1000’arounbuffer freshwater d lakes andpon ds iv R w Cold Northport Bay ro ar Spring W N N E Shore Rd e Baseflowyear 2-25 Con tributingAreas to SurfaceWaters North Rd c Harbor k Main St R Orient Harbor d Smithtown Bay * Priority 1 on this map is depicted by medium and high density residential parcels falling either partially or entirely within the 0-2 Year Baseflow Front St o e Main Rd Av d ** Priority 2 on this map is depicted by medium and high density residential parcels ew Mill Pond R Main St vi nga d Block Fort S alo n falling either partially or entirely within the 2-25 Year Baseflow u ÂC25A Main St C25A Port o A Â Jefferson S 25 Great Pond Island te *** Unsewered Residential on this map is depicted by medium density residential N ou F SHELTER R e 5 N r e 2 r (>1 to < 5 du/acre) and high density residential (>or equal to 5 du/acre) t o Sound u y o s t r R ÂC108 Old Dock Rd R a d Woodbury Rd Hallock Ave n d Route 25A d N Ferry Rd ISLAND ulaski R Bridge Ln P P k E Main St w Gardiners y Brander Pkwy e v A ÂCSM Oregon Rd Cox Ln M Bay k Route 112 r a N Bayview Rd i S Ferry Rd o n Y Ba d Miller Place Yaphank Rd SOUTHOLD yv w i R e Rd Menantic e y W Jericho Tpk ntr w e N u Miller Place Rd Mill Ln R HUNTINGTON o Canal Rd Route 25A d SMITHTOWN C ÂC25A ÂC25
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Patchogue Revitalization, Economic Impact Analysis Prepared For: Long Island Regional Planning Council
    Village of Patchogue Revitalization, Economic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Long Island Regional Planning Council ECONOMIC AND REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND USE OUTCOMES™ [ProjectVillage of Name] Patchogue Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis Study December 19, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Background Review 21 A Brief History of Patchogue’s Economic Rise, Fall & Rise 23 Timeline of Public & Private Investments in Patchogue 28 Interviews with Public & Private Sector Representatives 38 Economic Impact Analysis 48 Development Construction 53 New Non-Local Household Spending 59 New Business Operations 66 Fiscal Impacts 79 Multi-Family Housing Development Projects Built Since 2004 80 Prospective Large-Scale Development Projects 95 Documentation of the Increase in Assessed Property Values 114 Comparative Business, Employment & Investment Trends 118 Appendix 129 4WARD PLANNING LLCINC Page 2 [ProjectVillage of Name] Patchogue Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis Study December 19, 2018 Acknowledgements The Long Island Regional Planning Council acknowledges and appreciates the support of the Suffolk County Economic Development Corporation in producing this Study. 4ward Planning wishes to thank the following individuals for providing invaluable insights and for, particularly, helping to facilitate the study process over a period of several months: Mayor Paul Pontieri Marian H. Russo, Executive Director, Patchogue Community Development Agency (CDA) David Kennedy, Executive Director, Village of Patchogue Chamber of Commerce We also thank the Town of Brookhaven for its generous assistance with identifying critical property tax and revenue data. 4WARD PLANNING LLCINC Page 3 Executive Summary ECONOMIC AND REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND USE OUTCOMES ™ [ProjectVillage of Name] Patchogue Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis Study December 19, 2018 Introduction The redevelopment of the Village of Patchogue has been one of Long Island’s foremost community improvement success stories.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York
    Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York February 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County, NY New York District Table of Contents Section Page Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ 1 List of Appendices .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Purpose..................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 History of Duck Farming on Long Island................................................................................ 1 4.0 Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Duck Waste Statistics ....................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Off-site Impacts of Duck Farm Operation........................................................................ 3 4.2.1 Duck Sludge Deposits.................................................................................................... 4 4.3 On-site Impacts of Duck Farm Operation......................................................................... 5 5.0
    [Show full text]
  • The Courtyard BALATON PLACE ; NEWMARKET ; SUFFOLK
    The Courtyard BALATON PLACE ; NEWMARKET ; SUFFOLK The Courtyard BALATON PLACE ; NEWMARKET ; SUFFOLK Cambridge 13 miles, Bury St Edmunds 16 miles, Stansted Airport 34 miles, London 68 miles (distances approximate) A highly unique and captivating property offering 11,840 sq ft of extensive and flexible accommodation set in an enviable private town location with an impressive central Mediterranean style landscaped garden ; Reception Hall, 6 Reception Rooms, Office and Cinema Room, Kitchen/Breakfast Room, Utility Room, Boot Room and 2 Cloakrooms Master Bedroom with Dressing Room and En-Suite Bathroom, 3 Further Bedrooms (1 En-Suite) and Family Bathroom 3 Bedroom Guest Annexe, 2 Bedroom Gate Lodge, Integral 2 Bedroom Staff Flat Gated Driveway with Entrance Courtyard and Parking Six Car Garage and Store Mediterranean Style Central Courtyard Garden, Beautifully Planted Perimeter Walled Gardens with Gazebo 168 High Street, Newmarket Indoor Heated Swimming Pool with Gym, Jacuzzi Spa, Steam Room and Shower Room 132-134 Hills Road Suffolk CB8 9AJ 11,840 sq ft of impressive and flexible accommodation Cambridge CB2 8PA Tel: 01638 662231 Tel: 01223 347147 [email protected] ; [email protected] www.jackson-stops.co.uk www.savills.com Features • Sought After and Private Town Location • Welcoming Reception Hall • 6 Reception Rooms • Office and Cinema Room • Superb Kitchen/Breakfast Room • Utility Room, Boot Room and 2 Cloakrooms • Master Bedroom with Dressing Room and En-Suite Bathroom • 3 Further Bedrooms (1 En-Suite) and Family Bathroom
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Nesters, the Street, Stoke by Clare, Suffolk
    2 THE NESTERS, THE STREET, STOKE BY CLARE, SUFFOLK This mid terraced single storey dwelling is situated in a quiet tucked away position in the popular village of Stoke By Clare. The property, which offers tastefully presented living accommodation also offers allocated parking. Guide £190,000 2 The Nesters, The Street, Stoke By Clare, Sudbury, Outside Suffolk, CO10 8RL The property enjoys the benefit of a parking space with 2 The Nesters is a 2 bedroom mid terraced single storey an additional visitors parking shared between three dwelling situated in a quiet tucked away position. The properties. The enclosed rear garden offers a paved property, which offers tastefully presented living terrace leading onto the lawn with mature shrub beds accommodation, enjoys allocated parking with the and borders, a shed with power connected and gated addition of visitors parking and the benefit of an access leads to the front. enclosed rear garden. Location Sitting Room Stoke by Clare is a pretty and highly regarded village. Kitchen Picturesque cottages and houses surround the village Bedroom green and local services include a pub, community shop Bedroom 2/Dining Room and parish church. The village is also home to Stoke Bathroom College, an independent school and nursery. A wider Garden range of facilities are available at the small market town Parking of Clare, whilst comprehensive amenities are available at Haverhill, about 5 miles away. EPC Rating: C Viewing strictly by appointment with David Burr. Additional information Clare 01787 277811 Services: Main water and electricity. Oil fired heating. Castle Hedingham (01787) 463404 None of the services have been tested by the agent.
    [Show full text]