Design of the Large Hadron Electron Collider Interaction Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Design of the Large Hadron Electron Collider Interaction Region PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS—ACCELERATORS AND BEAMS 18, 111001 (2015) Design of the large hadron electron collider interaction region E. Cruz-Alaniz* and D. Newton University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom and Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, United Kingdom R. Tomás CERN, CH 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland M. Korostelev Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom and Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, United Kingdom (Received 3 June 2015; published 5 November 2015) The large hadron electron collider (LHeC) is a proposed upgrade of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) within the high luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) project, to provide electron-nucleon collisions and explore a new regime of energy and luminosity for deep inelastic scattering. The design of an interaction region for any collider is always a challenging task given that the beams are brought into crossing with the smallest beam sizes in a region where there are tight detector constraints. In this case integrating the LHeC into the existing HL-LHC lattice, to allow simultaneous proton-proton and electron-proton collisions, increases the difficulty of the task. A nominal design was presented in the the LHeC conceptual design report in 2012 featuring an optical configuration that focuses one of the proton beams of the LHC to βà ¼ 10 cm in the LHeC interaction point to reach the desired luminosity of L ¼ 1033 cm−2 s−1. This value is achieved with the aid of a new inner triplet of quadrupoles at a distance Là ¼ 10 m from the interaction point. However the chromatic beta beating was found intolerable regarding machine protection issues. An advanced chromatic correction scheme was required. This paper explores the feasibility of the extension of a novel optical technique called the achromatic telescopic squeezing scheme and the flexibility of the interaction region design, in order to find the optimal solution that would produce the highest luminosity while controlling the chromaticity, minimizing the synchrotron radiation power and maintaining the dynamic aperture required for stability. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.18.111001 PACS numbers: 41.85.-p I. INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION Particle physics has profited in the past from nucleon- The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [1] at CERN with nucleon, lepton-nucleon and lepton-lepton interactions. The LHC has brought nucleon-nucleon collisions into circumference of 27p kmffiffiffi has been providing proton-proton collisions between s ¼ 7 TeV and 13 TeV, lead-lead the TeV era and the high luminosity Large Hadron pffiffiffi Collider (HL-LHC) [6] project aims to build on this success collisions at s ¼ 2.76 TeV=nucleon and proton-lead pffiffiffi by increasing the luminosity to 5 × 1034 cm−2 s−1 in IP1 collisions at s ¼ 5 TeV=nucleon in four different inter- and IP5. action points, ATLAS [2] in interaction point 1 (IP1), The large hadron electron collider (LHeC) aims to make ALICE [3] in interaction point 2 (IP2), CMS [4] in use of the LHC infrastructure and a new 60 GeV electron interaction point 5 (IP5) and LHCb [5] in interaction point accelerator to provide electron-proton (e-p) collisions, also, 8 (IP8). Each of these interaction points is located in its pffiffiffi in the TeV scale, aiming for an energy ( s ¼ 2 TeV) corresponding interaction region (IR). Other sections of the 4 times higher and a luminosity (1033 cm−2 s−1) 100 times ring, the interaction region 3 (IR3) and interaction region higher than the previous e-p collider, HERA [7]. The LHeC 7 (IR7) are reserved for collimation purposes. A layout of would work alongside the HL-LHC and provide a com- the LHC configuration is shown in Fig. 1. plementary set of measurements. This paper starts by describing the method to achieve high luminosity collisions in the HL-LHC experiments * e.cruz‑[email protected] using the achromatic telescopic squeezing (ATS) scheme in Sec. II. The nominal LHeC IR design status as it was Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distri- presented in the LHeC conceptual design report (CDR) bution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and is described in Sec. III, at this point the integration into the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. the HL-LHC lattice was not yet successful. This paper 1098-4402=15=18(11)=111001(11) 111001-1 Published by the American Physical Society CRUZ-ALANIZ et al. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 111001 (2015) in the IT generate huge chromatic aberrations that exceed the capabilities of the standard chromatic correction scheme performed by the sextupole families [9]. In order to further reduce the βà the achromatic tele- scopic squeezing (ATS) scheme [9] has been proposed to overcome the previous limitations as explained below. B. Basic principles of the ATS A standard matching procedure is done in the interaction regions to get a βà of 44 cm (named presqueezed βÃ) in the case of round beams optics. A further reduction of the presqueezed βà is followed by a telescopic squeeze, in which β-beating waves are gen- erated in the arcs adjacent to the high luminosity insertions, namely the arc sectors 45, 56, 81, and 12, by adjusting the quadrupole strengths in the neighboring straight sections, i.e. IR4, IR6, IR8 and IR2. A fundamental merit of this scheme is the locality of the chromaticity correction of the inner triplet by using one single arc of sextupoles on either side of IP1 and IP5. By adjusting the phase advance in the arc cell to π=2, the β FIG. 1. LHC schematic configuration showing clockwise beam waves generated in the arc reach their maximum at every 1 colliding with counterclockwise beam 2 in the four different other sextupole and the rate of increase of the β function is experiments [1]. proportional to the rate of decrease of the βà during the squeeze. This increase of the β function in the location of demonstrates the feasibility of the extension of the ATS these sextupoles enhances the efficiency of the chromaticity scheme into the LHeC IR, as described in Sec. IV. The correction to compensate the chromaticity produced by the flexibility of this design is also studied to explore the limits high β functions in the IT. on luminosity and the reduction of the synchrotron radi- This correction of the chromaticity also features the ation in the IR (Sec. V). Most importantly the chromatic control of the chromatic Twiss parameters. This is studied correction of the previous optical designs is addressed via the Montague functions which are given by and its limits explored (Sec. VI). The synchrotron radiation 1 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi is studied to avoid too large background in the detector 2 2 W ¼ A þ B ; ð1Þ (Sec. VII). Lastly, particle tracking studies are done to 2 study the feasibility of such designs in terms of the stability of the beam (Secs. VIII and IX). where 1 ∂β II. HIGH LUMINOSITY COLLISIONS A ¼ ; ð2Þ β ∂δp The following sections introduce the HL-LHC current design, to later extend the study with the LHeC insertion ∂α in IR2. B ¼ − αA ð3Þ ∂δp βà A. Minimizing in HL-LHC and δp is the relative momentum deviation. The upgrade plans for the HL-LHC project include the Minimizing the Montague functions in the insertions implementation of a new inner triplet (IT) of high aperture IR3 and IR7 is required to not deteriorate the collimation quadrupoles. This inner triplet comprises three quadrupoles efficiencies. (Q1, Q2 and Q3) to the left and right of IP1 and IP5 [8]. The Montague functions have been studied previously Following the standard matching procedure [9] with for the LHC in [11] and the HL-LHC in [9], where further MADX [10], using as variables the strengths of the quadru- explanations about the overall ATS implementation can poles in IR1 and IR5, achieves a minimum value of βà in also be found. IP1 and IP5 respectively of about 30 cm. At this point The implementation of the ATS scheme provides a solid the mechanical acceptance of most of the magnets in the ground for the HL-LHC target of βà ¼ 15 cm in IP1 and matching section and the gradients of the matching quadru- IP5. Furthermore, the ATS scheme has also inspired a poles reach their limits. Furthermore, the high β functions telescopic squeeze implemented in the Relativistic Heavy 111001-2 DESIGN OF THE LARGE HADRON ELECTRON … Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 111001 (2015) TABLE I. L-R LHeC baseline and possible upgrade parameters. Baseline Upgrade Protons Electrons Protons Electrons Luminosity [1033 cm−2 s−1]111010 Beam energy (GeV) 7000 60 7000 60 Normalized emittance γϵx;y (μm) 3.75 50 2.5 20 βà (m) 0.1 0.12 0.05 0.10 rms beam size σx;y (μm) 7 7 4 4 rms beam divergence σx;y (μrad) 70 58 80 40 Beam current (mA) 430 (860) 6.4 1112 25 Bunch spacing (ns) 25 (50) 25 (50) 25 25 Bunch population [109] 1.7 × 102 1(2) 2.2 × 102 4 Bunch charge (nC) 27 0.16 (0.32) 35 0.64 Ion Collider (RHIC) to further reduce the βà [12]. The final IR design will need to incorporate an escape line for following sections explain the LHeC design to later on the neutral particles coming from the IP, probably requiring extend the ATS scheme to include the LHeC insertion. to split D1 into two parts separated by tens of meters. Bending dipoles around the IP are used to make the III.
Recommended publications
  • From Precision Physics to the Energy Frontier with the Compact Linear Collider
    PERSPECTIVE | FOCUS https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0834-8PERSPECTIVE | FOCUS From precision physics to the energy frontier with the Compact Linear Collider Eva Sicking ✉ and Rickard Ström The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a proposed high-luminosity collider that would collide electrons with their antiparticles, positrons, at energies ranging from a few hundred giga-electronvolts to a few tera-electronvolts. By covering a large energy range and by ultimately reaching collision energies in the multi-tera-electronvolts range, scientists at CLIC aim to improve the understanding of nature’s fundamental building blocks and to discover new particles or other physics phenomena. CLIC is an international project hosted by CERN with 75 institutes worldwide participating in the accelerator, detector and physics stud- ies. If commissioned, the first electron–positron collisions at CLIC are expected around 2035, following the high-luminosity phase of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. Here we survey the principal merits of CLIC, and examine the opportunities that arise as a result of its design. We argue that CLIC represents an attractive proposition for the next-generation particle col- lider by combining an innovative accelerator technology, a realistic delivery timescale, and a physics programme that is highly complementary to existing accelerators, reaching uncharted territory. he discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider to a lower event rate. These characteristics and the low duty cycle (LHC) in 20121,2 was an important milestone in high-energy of linear colliders make a trigger-less detector readout possible at Tphysics. It completes a puzzle that scientists have been work- CLIC.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Primary Vertices at the ATLAS Experiment in Run 1 Proton–Proton Collisions at the LHC
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 332 CERN-EP-2016-150 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4887-5 23rd June 2017 Reconstruction of primary vertices at the ATLAS experiment in Run 1 proton–proton collisions at the LHC The ATLAS Collaboration This paper presents the method and performance of primary vertex reconstruction in proton– proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment during Run 1 of thep LHC. The studies presented focus on data taken during 2012 at a centre-of-mass energy of s = 8 TeV. The performance has been measured as a function of the number of interactions per bunch crossing over a wide range, from one to seventy. The measurement of the position and size of the luminous region and its use as a constraint to improve the primary vertex resolution are discussed. A longitudinal vertex position resolution of about 30 µm is achieved for events with high multiplicity of reconstructed tracks. The transverse position resolution is better than 20 µm and is dominated by the precision on the size of the luminous region. An analytical model is proposed to describe the primary vertex reconstruction efficiency as a function of the number of interactions per bunch crossing and of the longitudinal size of the luminous region. Agreement between the data and the predictions of this model is better than 3% up to seventy interactions per bunch crossing. arXiv:1611.10235v2 [physics.ins-det] 22 Jun 2017 c 2017 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Reproduction of this article or parts of it is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Material of the ATLAS Inner Detector for Run 2 of the LHC
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) Submitted to: JINST CERN-EP-2017-081 11th July 2017 Study of the material of the ATLAS inner detector for Run 2 of the LHC The ATLAS Collaboration The ATLAS inner detector comprises three different sub-detectors: the pixel detector, the silicon strip tracker, and the transition-radiation drift-tube tracker. The Insertable B-Layer, a new innermost pixel layer, was installed during the shutdown period in 2014, together with modifications to the layout of the cables and support structures of the existing pixel detector. pThe material in the inner detector is studied with several methods, using a low-luminosity s = 13 TeV pp collision sample corresponding to around 2:0 nb−1 collected in 2015 with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. In this paper, the material within the innermost barrel region is studied using reconstructed hadronic interaction and photon conversion vertices. For the forward rapidity region, the material is probed by a measurement of the efficiency with which single tracks reconstructed from pixel detector hits alone can be extended with hits on the track in the strip layers. The results of these studies have been taken into account in an improved description of the material in the ATLAS inner detector simulation, resulting in a reduction in the uncertainties associated with the charged-particle reconstruction efficiency determined from simulation. arXiv:1707.02826v1 [hep-ex] 10 Jul 2017 c 2017 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Reproduction of this article or parts of it is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS Experiment 1 ATLAS Experiment
    ATLAS experiment 1 ATLAS experiment Large Hadron Collider (LHC) LHC experiments ATLAS A Toroidal LHC Apparatus CMS Compact Muon Solenoid LHCb LHC-beauty ALICE A Large Ion Collider Experiment TOTEM Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation LHCf LHC-forward MoEDAL Monopole and Exotics Detector At the LHC LHC preaccelerators p and Pb Linear accelerators for protons (Linac 2) and Lead (Linac 3) (not marked) Proton Synchrotron Booster PS Proton Synchrotron SPS Super Proton Synchrotron ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC Apparatus) is one of the seven particle detector experiments (ALICE, ATLAS, CMS, TOTEM, LHCb, LHCf and MoEDAL) constructed at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a new particle accelerator at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland. ATLAS is 44 metres long and 25 metres in diameter, weighing about 7,000 tonnes. The project is led by Fabiola Gianotti and involves roughly 2,000 scientists and engineers at 165 institutions in 35 countries.[1][2] The construction was originally scheduled to be completed in June 2007, but was ready and detected its first beam events on 10 September 2008.[3] The experiment is designed to observe phenomena that involve highly massive particles which were not observable using earlier lower-energy accelerators and might shed light on new theories of particle physics beyond the Standard Model. The ATLAS collaboration, the group of physicists building the detector, was formed in 1992 when the proposed EAGLE (Experiment for Accurate Gamma, Lepton and Energy Measurements) and ASCOT (Apparatus with Super Conducting Toroids) collaborations merged their efforts into building a single, general-purpose particle detector for the Large Hadron Collider.[4] The design was a combination of those two previous designs, as well as the detector research and development that had been done for the Superconducting Supercollider.
    [Show full text]
  • The Large Hadron Collider O
    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 67 (2012) 705–734 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ppnp Review The large hadron collider O. Brüning ∗, H. Burkhardt, S. Myers CERN, Geneva, Switzerland article info a b s t r a c t Keywords: The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest and most energetic particle collider. Collider It took many years to plan and build this large complex machine which promises exciting, Storage ring new physics results for many years to come. We describe and review the machine design Luminosity and parameters, with emphasis on subjects like luminosity and beam conditions which are relevant for the large community of physicists involved in the experiments at the LHC. First collisions in the LHC were achieved at the end of 2009 and followed by a period of a rapid performance increase. We discuss what has been learned so far and what can be expected for the future. ' 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................................. 706 2. Basic design considerations.................................................................................................................................................................... 706 2.1. Project goals ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Interaction Point Collision Feedback System at the International Linear Collider and Its Sensitivity to Expected Electromagnetic Backgrounds
    The Interaction Point Collision Feedback System at the International Linear Collider and its Sensitivity to Expected Electromagnetic Backgrounds C. I. Clarke Wolfson College Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford Hilary Term, 2008 Abstract An Interaction Point Collision Feedback System is necessary to achieve design luminosity at the future International Linear Collider (ILC). This is proposed to include a stripline beam position monitor (BPM) positioned ∼3 m from the Interaction Point (IP). The BPM is required to be able to measure the position of the outgoing electron or positron beam with a resolution of ∼1 µm. Prototype feedback systems have been built and tested at the Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator (NLCTA) at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in the USA (SLAC) and also at the Accelerator Test Facility (ATF) at the High Energy Research Laboratory in Japan (KEK). The successful correction of position offsets is demonstrated with the lowest latency achieved 24 ns, the best position resolution 4 µm and the best correction ratio 23:1. To make the feedback system a more powerful tool, a digital processor is added. It raises the total latency of the feedback system to ∼140 ns. Its ability to perform algorithms is demonstrated with charge normalisation. Preliminary results indicate a resolution of ∼8 µm and correction ratio 7:1. Backgrounds at the ILC comprise mainly electron-positron pairs from the beam-beam interaction. For the high luminosity 1TeV accelerator parameters, 105 pairs are produced per bunch crossing. This is the worst case for ILC pair backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measurement of Material in the ATLAS Tracker Using Secondary Hadronic Interactions in 7 Tev Pp Collisions
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) JINST 11, (2016), P11020 CERN-EP-2016-137 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/11/11/P11020 12th March 2018 A measurement of material in the ATLAS tracker using secondary hadronic interactions in 7 TeV pp collisions The ATLAS Collaboration Abstract Knowledge of the material in the ATLAS inner tracking detector is crucial in understand- ing the reconstruction of charged-particle tracks, the performance of algorithms that identify jets containing b-hadrons and is also essential to reduce background in searches for exotic particles that can decay within the inner detector volume. Interactions of primary hadrons produced in pp collisions with the material in the inner detector are used to map the loca- tion and amount of this material. The hadronic interactions of primary particles may result in secondary vertices, which in this analysis are reconstructed by an inclusive vertex-finding al- gorithm. Data were collected using minimum-bias triggersp by the ATLAS detector operating at the LHC during 2010 at centre-of-mass energy s = 7 TeV, and correspond to an integ- rated luminosity of 19 nb−1. Kinematic properties of these secondary vertices are used to study the validity of the modelling of hadronic interactions in simulation. Secondary-vertex yields are compared between data and simulation over a volume of about 0.7 m3 around the arXiv:1609.04305v2 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2017 interaction point, and agreement is found within overall uncertainties. c 2018 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Reproduction of this article or parts of it is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Linear Collider
    THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR COLLIDER From Design to Reality Image: form one 2 | 3 foreword: window to the terascale Particle accelerators have been the primary tool of particle physics for over 60 years. They have enabled great advances and discoveries, the latest being the discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. Using complementary approaches of colliding protons on protons as a broad-band discovery device and colliding electrons on positrons as a precision probe of the physics, we have uncovered the basic constituents of matter and fundamental symmetries in nature. The International Linear Collider is the next advance in accelerators and will be the complementary electron-positron collider for the Large Hadron Collider. The ILC will enable precision studies of the underlying physics of the Higgs, a completely new kind of particle responsible for the creation of mass in nature. Among the earliest particle accelerators were cyclotrons, which were followed by larger and larger particle accelerators and colliders that brought us at each step to higher energies and new discoveries of physics at very short distances. Now, the development of a linear collider represents yet another major step in our ability to accelerate very light particles, like electrons and positrons, and pave the way to new insights into how our world works. The technologies for a linear collider have been developed through an ambitious global R&D programme and are now, with the publication of the ILC Technical Design Report, ready to be employed in the next particle accelerator. We are technically prepared to build a complementary electron- positron collider to the Large Hadron Collider.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of LHC Experiments
    SCIPP 11/06 Fundamentals of LHC Experiments Jason Nielsen Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics and Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 [email protected] June 1, 2011 Abstract Experiments on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN represent our furthest excursion yet along the energy frontier of particle physics. The goal of probing physical processes at the TeV energy scale puts strict requirements on the performance of accelerator and experiment, dictating the awe-inspiring dimensions of both. These notes, based on a set of five lectures given at the 2010 Theoretical Advanced Studies Institute in Boulder, Colorado, not only review the physics considered as part of the accelerator and experiment design, but also introduce algorithms and tools used to interpret experimental results in terms of theoretical models. The search for new physics beyond the Standard Model presents many new challenges, a few of which are addressed in specific examples. 1 Introduction Experimental results combined with theoretical considerations imply the exis- tence of new physics beyond the Standard Model, at energies no greater than 1 TeV. Although this has been known for a while [1], the possibility of accessing this energy scale, known as the \terascale," has now been realized in current- day hadron colliders and the experiments that use them. These notes provide a brief overview of the experimental considerations and design needed to measure arXiv:1106.2516v1 [hep-ex] 13 Jun 2011 particle interactions at the terascale. To probe directly the physics at the 1 TeV scale, we need a momentum transfer Q2 of approximately 1 TeV between the initial state particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Protection Considerations in the Design of the Lhc, Cern's Large Hadron Collider
    XA00XC003 EUROPEAN LABORATORY FOR PARTICLE PHYSICS CERN/TIS-RP/96-14/CF RADIATION PROTECTION CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF THE LHC, CERN'S LARGE HADRON COLLIDER. M. Hofert, M. Huhtinen, L. E. Moritz, H. Nakashima, K. M. Potter, S. Rollet, G. R. Stevenson and J. M. Zazula, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland ABSTRACT This paper describes the radiological concerns which are being taken into account in the de- sign of the LHC (CERN's future Large Hadron Collider). The machine will be built in the 27 km circumference ring tunnel of the existing LEP collider at CERN. The high intensity of the circu- lating beams (each containing more than 1014 protons at 7TeV) determines the thickness speci- fication of the shielding of the main-ring tunnel, the precautions to be taken in the design of the beam dumps and their associated caverns and the radioactivity induced by the loss of protons in the main ring by inelastic beam-gas interactions. The high luminosity of the collider is designed to provide inelastic collision rates of 109 per second in each of the two principal detector installa- tions, ATLAS and CMS. These collisions determine the shielding of the experimental areas, the radioactivity induced in both the detectors and in the machine components on either side of the experimental installations and, to some extent, the radioactivity induced in the beam-cleaning (scraper) systems. Some of the environmental issues raised by the project will be discussed. To be presented at the Health Physics Society's 30th Midyear Topical Meeting on The Health Physics of Radiation Generating Machines, San Jose, California, January 5-8, 1997 CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 17 October 1996 3 1/20 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadronic Interaction Vertices Analysis with the ATLAS Detector
    Hadronic Interaction Vertices Analysis with the ATLAS Detector EP-ADP Department CERN Summer Student Project Report Submitted by: Natasha Mahmood Supervisors: Dr. Anthony Morley & Dr. Valentina Cairo CERN Summer Student Session: June-August 2018 1 Abstract The ATLAS detector is able to reconstruct hadronic interaction vertices inside the pixel detector, and with the use of information about the energy deposit of secondary hadrons in subsequent layers of pixel detector (dE/dX), the secondary particle species can be identified (pions can be separated from protons and kaons). The goal of this project is to study the properties of secondary hadrons from interactions of primary particles in specific layers of the pixel detector. In particular, to provide information about the species of the secondary particles that may assist in the tuning of the numerical models used to simulate these interactions. 2 1. Introduction The ATLAS Pixel detector is able to provide a measurement of the specific energy loss 푑퐸⁄푑푥 for particles. This report presents a study to identify the secondary hadrons from interaction of the primary particles in specifc layers of the pixel detector. By using the measured energy loss of the secondary particles the number of particles for each species can be extracted. The proton-proton collision data sample used to perform the measurements described in this report was collected in 2015 at a centre-of-mass energy of √푠 = 13 푇푒푉 by the ATLAS detector [1] at the LHC. During this running period, the LHC was operating in a special configuration with a low instantaneous luminosity. In this report, the EPOS MC Event generator [2] is used to simulate minimum-bias inelastic proton-proton collision.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Simulated and Observed LHC Beam Backgrounds in the ATLAS Experiment at Ebeam =4 Tev
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) JINST 13 (2018) P12006 CERN-EP-2018-240 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/12/P12006 18th December 2018 Comparison between simulated and observed LHC beam backgrounds in the ATLAS experiment at Ebeam =4 TeV The ATLAS Collaboration Results of dedicated Monte Carlo simulations of beam-induced background (BIB) in the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are presented and compared with data recorded in 2012. During normal physics operation this background arises mainly from scattering of the 4 TeV protons on residual gas in the beam pipe. Methods of reconstructing the BIB signals in the ATLAS detector, developed and implemented in the simulation chain based on the Fluka Monte Carlo simulation package, are described. The interaction rates are determined from the residual gas pressure distribution in the LHC ring in order to set an absolute scale on the predicted rates of BIB so that they can be compared quantitatively with data. Through these comparisons the origins of the BIB leading to different observables in the ATLAS detectors are analysed. The level of agreement between simulation results and BIB measurements by ATLAS in 2012 demonstrates that a good understanding of the origin of BIB has been reached. arXiv:1810.04450v2 [hep-ex] 17 Dec 2018 © 2018 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Reproduction of this article or parts of it is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4.0 license. 1 Introduction Proton losses in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) ring upstream1 of the ATLAS experiment [1], due to interactions with either residual gas in the beam pipe (beam–gas scattering) or with machine elements such as collimators, result in beam-induced background (BIB).
    [Show full text]