Downloads, Would Then Need to Be Planned Around This the Access Time to Use the Time Effectively [38]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloads, Would Then Need to Be Planned Around This the Access Time to Use the Time Effectively [38] Abstract This work presents the design of a 6U nanosat carrying a NASA-designed miniature Ion Neutral Mass Spectrometer (mini-INMS) and the design and construction of a Helmholtz cage. The nanosat is designed to measure particle composition of the ionosphere’s F layer by flying on an elliptical orbit with an initial perigee of 250 km and apogee of 400 km. The nanosat will be deployed in a Sun-synchronous orbit and transfer to a lower orbit using an electrospray thruster for orbit raising and drag compensation to extend the mission lifetime which was analyzed in Systems Tool Kit (STK). A novel spinning motion is utilized to expand the particle collection capability of the mini-INMS. Attitude control was provided by magnetorquers with attitude determination and control schemes developed in MATLAB. Mechanical, thermal, and telecommunications analysis is performed using SolidWorks, ANSYS, COMSOL, and STK. Environmental factors, including magnetic field interference, radiation dosage, and particle impacts are also analyzed and accounted for using STK. Electrical power analysis was performed using STK and MATLAB to create a model of CubeSat power generation, storage and use. The Helmholtz cage, composed of three pairs of orthogonal square coils, was designed to simulate the magnetic environment experienced by the nanosat to provide ground-based testing of the magnetorquer-based ADCS. This cage was designed, manufactured, and tested to verify its accuracy. A controllable power source and data collection methods were also constructed to allow many different magnetic environments to be simulated. “Certain materials are included under the fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law and have been prepared according to the fair use guidelines and are restricted from further use." Acknowledgements The team would like to thank the following individuals for their support in completing this project. Project advisors Professor Taillefer Professor Gatsonis Additional Support Adriana Hera Tina Stratis Ian Anderson 3 Table of Authorship 1 Introduction Brown 1.1 Background and Literature Review 1.1.1 CubeSat Applications and Missions Brown 1.1.2 Review of CubeSats at WPI St Jean 1.1.3 Helmholtz Cage Mileti 1.2 Goals Robatzek, Messey 1.3 Objectives, Approach, and Standards All 1.4 Mission Operations and Constraints Brown 1.5 Design Requirements and Constraints All 1.5.1 CubeSat 1.5.1.1 Dispenser background and selection Cooley 1.5.1.2 Launch vehicle background and selection Cooley 1.5.1.3 Mechanical Cooley 1.5.1.4 Propulsion Messey 1.5.1.5 Power St Jean 1.5.1.6 Telecommunications Robatzek 1.5.1.7 ADCS Klenk 1.5.1.8 Environmental Effects Brown 1.5.1.9 Thermal Control Mileti 1.5.2 Helmholtz Cage Klenk 1.6 Project Management and Budget Messey 1.7 Task Breakdown and Timetable Messey 1.8 Facilities and Equipment Mileti 2 Payload and Design Implications Brown 3 Mechanical Design and Analysis Cooley 4 Propulsion Messey 5 Power System Design and Analysis St Jean 6 Telecommunications Design Robatzek 7 Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem Klenk 8 Space Environment and Effects Brown 9 Thermal Control Analysis Mileti 10 Helmholtz Cage 10.1 Helmholtz Cage Overview Klenk 10.2 Helmholtz Cage Development and Design Klenk 10.3 Structural Design Cooley, St Jean 10.3.1 Magnetorquer Mounting Method Brown 10.3.2 Power Supplies Messey, Robatzek 10.3.3 Motor Controllers Mileti 10.4 Magnetorquer Test Article St. Jean, Klenk 10.5 Data Collection Methods Brown, Cooley 10.6 Data Management Cooley 10.7 Assembly St. Jean, Messey 4 10.8 Testing Klenk 11 Conclusion and Recommendations 11.1 Social Implications of CubeSats Brown 11.2 Recommendations 11.2.1 Spacecraft Charging Brown 11.2.2 Integrated System Cooley 11.2.3 Magnetorquers and Spinner Satellites Cooley 11.2.4 Magnetorquer Test Article Stand Brown Appendices Appendix A Cooley Appendix B Cooley Appendix C Messey Appendix D Messey Appendix E Robatzek Appendix F Klenk Appendix G Klenk Appendix H Klenk Appendix I Klenk Appendix J Klenk Appendix K Mileti Appendix L Klenk Appendix M Klenk Appendix N All 5 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Authorship ........................................................................................................................ 4 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 6 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 11 Table of Tables ............................................................................................................................. 15 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 17 1.1 Background and Literature Review................................................................................ 18 1.1.1 CubeSat Applications and Missions ............................................................................. 18 1.1.2 Review of CubeSats at WPI ......................................................................................... 19 1.1.3 Helmholtz Cage ............................................................................................................ 21 1.2 Goals.................................................................................................................................... 21 1.3 Objectives, Approach, and Standards ................................................................................. 22 1.4 Mission Operations and Constraints ................................................................................... 25 1.5 Design Requirements and Constraints ................................................................................ 27 1.5.1 CubeSat ......................................................................................................................... 27 1.5.2 Helmholtz Cage ............................................................................................................ 37 1.6 Project Management and Budget ........................................................................................ 38 1.7 Task Breakdown and Timetable .......................................................................................... 39 1.8 Facilities and Equipment ..................................................................................................... 40 2 Payload and Design Implications............................................................................................... 41 2.1 Payload Overview ............................................................................................................... 41 2.2 Payload Data Collection ...................................................................................................... 44 3 Mechanical Design and Analysis ............................................................................................... 46 3.1 Mechanical Overview ......................................................................................................... 46 3.2 Mechanical Requirements ................................................................................................... 46 3.3 Mechanical Design .............................................................................................................. 48 3.3.1 Material Models ............................................................................................................ 51 3.3.2 Summary of Mechanical Design .................................................................................. 52 6 3.4 Mechanical Analysis ........................................................................................................... 57 3.4.1 Analysis Setup .............................................................................................................. 58 3.4.2 Modal Analysis ............................................................................................................. 60 3.4.3 Random Vibration Analysis ......................................................................................... 61 3.4.4 Results .......................................................................................................................... 65 4 Propulsion Analysis ................................................................................................................... 73 4.1 Propulsion Overview ........................................................................................................... 73 4.2 Thruster Selection ............................................................................................................... 75 4.3 Orbital Analysis................................................................................................................... 81 4.3.1 Science Leg Orbit ......................................................................................................... 81 4.3.2 Mission Set-Up ............................................................................................................. 83 4.3.3 Orbital Results .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • A Methodology for Cubesat Mission Selection Luis Zea, Victor Ayerdi, Sergio Argueta, and Antonio Muñoz Universidad Del Valle De Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala
    Zea, L. et al. (2016): JoSS, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 483–511 (Peer-reviewed article available at www.jossonline.com) www.DeepakPublishing.com www. JoSSonline.com A Methodology for CubeSat Mission Selection Luis Zea, Victor Ayerdi, Sergio Argueta, and Antonio Muñoz Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala Abstract Over 400 CubeSats have been launched during the first 13 years of existence of this 10 cm cube-per unit standard. The CubeSat’s flexibility to use commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) parts and its standardization of in- terfaces have reduced the cost of developing and operating space systems. This is evident by satellite design projects where at least 95 universities and 18 developing countries have been involved. Although most of these initial projects had the sole mission of demonstrating that a space system could be developed and operated in- house, several others had scientific missions on their own. The selection of said mission is not a trivial process, however, as the cost and benefits of different options need to be carefully assessed. To conduct this analysis in a systematic and scholarly fashion, a methodology based on maximizing the benefits while considering program- matic risk and technical feasibility was developed for the current study. Several potential mission categories, which include remote sensing and space-based research, were analyzed for their technical requirements and fea- sibility to be implemented on CubeSats. The methodology helps compare potential missions based on their rele- vance, risk, required resources, and benefits. The use of this flexible methodology—as well as its inputs and outputs—is demonstrated through a case study.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sample AMS Latex File
    PLEASE SEE CORRECTED APPENDIX A IN CORRIGENDUM, JOSS VOL. 6, NO. 3, DECEMBER 2017 Zea, L. et al. (2016): JoSS, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 483–511 (Peer-reviewed article available at www.jossonline.com) www.DeepakPublishing.com www. JoSSonline.com A Methodology for CubeSat Mission Selection Luis Zea, Victor Ayerdi, Sergio Argueta, and Antonio Muñoz Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala Abstract Over 400 CubeSats have been launched during the first 13 years of existence of this 10 cm cube-per unit standard. The CubeSat’s flexibility to use commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) parts and its standardization of in- terfaces have reduced the cost of developing and operating space systems. This is evident by satellite design projects where at least 95 universities and 18 developing countries have been involved. Although most of these initial projects had the sole mission of demonstrating that a space system could be developed and operated in- house, several others had scientific missions on their own. The selection of said mission is not a trivial process, however, as the cost and benefits of different options need to be carefully assessed. To conduct this analysis in a systematic and scholarly fashion, a methodology based on maximizing the benefits while considering program- matic risk and technical feasibility was developed for the current study. Several potential mission categories, which include remote sensing and space-based research, were analyzed for their technical requirements and fea- sibility to be implemented on CubeSats. The methodology helps compare potential missions based on their rele- vance, risk, required resources, and benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Satellite Mission Failure Rates
    NASA/TM—2018– 220034 Small-Satellite Mission Failure Rates Stephen A. Jacklin NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA March 2019 This page is required and contains approved text that cannot be changed. NASA STI Program ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. to the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA scientific and technical technical conferences, symposia, seminars, information (STI) program plays a key part in or other meetings sponsored or helping NASA maintain this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, auspices of the Agency Chief Information Officer. technical, or historical information from It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, and NASA programs, projects, and missions, disseminates NASA’s STI. The NASA STI often concerned with subjects having program provides access to the NTRS Registered substantial public interest. and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports Server, thus providing one of the largest TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. collections of aeronautical and space science STI English-language translations of foreign in the world. Results are published in both non- scientific and technical material pertinent to NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI NASA’s mission. Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services also include organizing and publishing research results, distributing TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of specialized research announcements and completed research or a major significant feeds, providing information desk and personal phase of research that present the results of search support, and enabling data exchange NASA Programs and include extensive data services.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Radiation Tolerant Satellite Communication Modem
    Master Thesis Electrical Engineering June 2012 Evaluation of radiation tolerant satellite communication modem Venkata Srikanth Bhuma Santosh Kumar Balsu School of Computing Blekinge Institute of Technology 371 79 Karlskrona Sweden This thesis is submitted to the School of Computing at Blekinge Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering. The thesis is equivalent to 20 weeks of full time studies. Contact Information: Author(s): Venkata Srikanth Bhuma E-mail: [email protected] Santosh Kumar Balsu E-mail: [email protected] External advisor(s): Jan Schulte ÅAC Microtec AB Dag Hammarskjölds väg 54, SE-751 83 Uppsala Sweden Phone: +46700910429 University advisor(s): Craig A. Lindley School of Computing University Examiner(s): Patrik Arlos School of Computing School of Computing Internet : www.bth.se/com Blekinge Institute of Technology Phone : +46 455 38 50 00 371 79 Karlskrona Fax : +46 455 38 50 57 ii Sweden ABSTRACT The design specification of CubeSat standards by California Polytechnique University has become a major milestone in development and deployment of nano satellites. The number of CubeSats that are being deployed into the orbit has increased in recent years. The design and development have been transformed from traditional hardware devices to software defined radios. However there is a lack of clear understanding and concrete findings on developing proper communication transceivers. The lack of knowledge of proper guidelines to be followed to design and develop communication subsystems prompts and acts as a base for us in understanding the communication subsystem design standards followed by CubeSat projects in various universities.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD SPACECRAFT DIGEST by Jos Heyman 1998 Version: 10 July 2016 © Copyright Jos Heyman
    WORLD SPACECRAFT DIGEST by Jos Heyman 1998 Version: 10 July 2016 © Copyright Jos Heyman 1998 001A (25131) Name: Lunar Prospector Country: USA Launch date: 7 January 1998 Re-entry: 31 July 1999 Launch site: Cape Canaveral Launch vehicle: Athena 2 Orbit: 99 x 100 km, inclination: 90.1 ° The Lunar Prospector was the third mission in NASA's Discovery series of spacecraft and was built by Lockheed Martin. The mission objective was to place the spacecraft in a lunar orbit from which it spend a year mapping the surface of the Moon whilst at the same time looking for reservoirs of water which might be in the polar caps. The 126 kg spacecraft carried a series of instruments which evolved from Apollo instrumentation from the seventies: 1. the Gamma Ray Spectrometer (GSR) which provided global maps of the elemental composition of the surface layer of the Moon; 2. the Alpha Particle Spectrometer (APS) to detect radon outgassing on the lunar surface; 3. the Neutron Spectrometer (NS) to detect water ice; 4. the Electron Reflectometer (ER) to map the lunar magnetic fields; 5. the Magnetometer (MAG), another instrument to map the lunar magnetic fields; 6. the Doppler Gravity Experiment (DGE) to determine the lunar gravity field. Also carried was a small container with the ashes of Eugene Shoemaker, a famous discoverer of comets who had passed away in 1997. This container was designated as Celestis-2 and the payload was also known as Luna 1 flight. The spacecraft did not carry a control computer, instead it was fully controlled by a team on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • JAXA Astronaut AKIHIKO HOSHIDE Deploying Small Satellites From
    Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency August 2012 No. 06 Special Features JAXAJAXA AstronautAstronaut AKIHIKOAKIHIKO HOSHIDEHOSHIDE TalksTalks aboutabout hishis long-termlong-term missionmission aboardaboard thethe ISSISS andand passespasses onon hishis messagemessage toto childrenchildren whowho dreamdream ofof becomingbecoming anan astronautastronaut DeployingDeploying SmallSmall SatellitesSatellites fromfrom JEMJEM KiboKibo First-everFirst-ever attemptattempt atat deployingdeploying smallsmall satellitessatellites fromfrom thethe ISSISS usingusing roboticrobotic armarm Letter from Vienna A New Serial, for JAXA TODAY (No.1) Warm greetings from Vienna, Austria! I am Toshiro Ozawa, the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Permanent Mission of Japan to the International Organizations in Vienna. In early June, COPUOS (Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space), during its 55th session, elected Dr. Yasushi Horikawa, Technical Counsellor of JAXA, as the chairman of COPUOS for a tenure of two years. I write this ‘Message from Vienna’ to com- memorate Dr. Horikawa’s assumption of the Chair of COPUOS. COPUOS is one of the Standing Committees of the UN General Assembly with a long history, having celebrated its 50th anniver- sary last year. From its inception, COPUOS promoted international cooperation on the peaceful uses of outer space and is known for establishing international norms such as the Outer Space Treaty. In recent years, it’s Scientifi c and Technical Sub-committee has been working to establish guidelines for the long term sustainability of space activities. This year, as a refl ection of the increased attention for the practical activities of COPUOS, the European Union held a multi-lateral meeting on the ‘Code of Conduct’, which includes matters relating to national security. This meeting was held on the margins of COPUOS, one day prior to the 55th session of COPUOS.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL.62 Jun 23 2011 Meisei Electric's Cube Satellite “WE WISH
    VOL.62 Jun 23 2011 Meisei Electric’s Cube Satellite “WE WISH” Adjudicated as Cubesat-Releasing Experiment from “Kibo” ! On June 15, 2011, JAXA disclosed the result of their study on the onboard cube satellite relating to a cubesat-releasing demonstration mission from “Kibo” (Japanese Experiment Module) and adjudicated Meisei Electric’s “WE WISH” among the candidates invited for the selection. The 3 satellites including Meisei Electric’s will be carried to “Kibo” of ISS (International Space Station) by HTV (H-II Model of Cube Satellite Transfer Vehicle) and set up in the release system to launch with a robot arm in the “WE WISH” outer space. The 2 aims of “WE WISH” are to contribute to local technical education and use promotion of cube satellite acquisition data and also to proof technically micro heat infrared camera in the concept of “monitoring and investigating very closely global environment with the satellite” by full use of an upper air observation equipment, “GPS Radiosonde” technology. Meisei Electric will continue to do the best in the field of small satellite. “Weather Observation Equipment” at Environment Radiation Monitoring Center (Kagoshima Pref.) ! Meisei Electric-make “Weather Observation Equipment” was adopted and started the operation at Environment Radiation Monitoring Center (Kagoshima Prefecture). For the monitoring of environmental radiation the center maintains and manages 22 sites of space radiation monitoring station established around Sendai Nuclear Power Station of Kyushu Electric Power. 24-hour intensive monitoring is performed by a telemeter system, and the information is provided in real time to the Weather Observation Equipment Kagoshima prefectural office and Kagoshima atomic energy disaster prevention at Hashima Site center, relating cities and Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Brochure
    Headquarters 2223 Naganuma-cho, Isesaki-shi, Gunma 372-8585, JAPAN Tel: +81-270-32-1111 (main) Fax: +81-270-32-6505 Tokyo Branch Toyosu IHI Bldg., 3-1-1 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8115, JAPAN Tel: +81-3-6204-8250 (main) Fax: +81-3-6204-8888 Factory 2223 Naganuma-cho, Isesaki-shi, Gunma 372-8585, JAPAN Tel: +81-270-32-1111 (main) Fax: +81-270-32-6505 www.meisei.co.jp/english/ Sensing & Communication 2017.11.1000 We create innovative products and services with our original Sensing & Sensing & Communication technologies and Communication thereby contribute to development of a safe and secure society. To quantify various natural phenomena in the magnificent universe and transform to valuable information. This is the mission of Meisei Electric Co., Ltd.. Starting with the manufacturing of meteorological observation system "radiosonde", Meisei has been leading the meteorological and seismological observation in Japan through the development of "AMeDAS", "seismic intensity meters", etc. In the Space field, Meisei has been involved from the initial stage of Space development in Japan and developed and launched approximately 3,000 units of observation instruments to the universe. In 2012, we succeeded in the deployment of Cubesat "WE WISH" from the International Space Station, which we had originally developed. Measures to mitigate damage from natural disasters such as frequent earthquakes, local heavy rains and floods are becoming increasingly important. Meanwhile, Space utilization has already become closely connected to our life and higher utilization is expected. Sensing & Communication, "Technology to measure" and "Technology to communicate". Based on these original technologies, we will continue to create innovative products and services to contribute to the development of a safe and secure society.
    [Show full text]