Hydrological Modelling for the Rivers Lavant and Ems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrological Modelling for the Rivers Lavant and Ems Hydrological Modelling for the Rivers Lavant and Ems S.J. Cole, P.J. Howard and R.J. Moore Version 1.1 September 2009 Acknowledgements The following Environment Agency representatives are thanked for their involvement in the project: Paul Carter, John Hall, Colin Spiller, Tony Byrne, Mike Vaughan and Chris Manning. At CEH, Vicky Bell and Alice Robson are thanked for their contributions. Revision History Version Originator Comments Date 1.0 Cole, Draft of Final Report submitted to the 14 August 2009 Howard, Environment Agency for comment. Moore 1.1 Cole, Revision incorporating feedback 30 September 2009 Howard, from the Environment Agency. Moore Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Maclean Building Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BB UK Telephone +44 (0) 1491 838800 Main Fax +44 (0) 1491 6924241 ii Acknowledgements CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................... v List of Figures................................................................................................................ vii Executive Summary....................................................................................................... xi 1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Forecast requirements for the Lavant and Ems catchments ................................. 2 1.3 Specific objectives of the project.......................................................................... 3 2 The extended PDM model for groundwater catchments ................................ 4 2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 2.2 The standard PDM ................................................................................................ 4 2.3 The extended PDM ............................................................................................... 5 3 Data requirements and availability for modelling......................................... 13 3.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Rainfall................................................................................................................ 13 3.3 River levels/flows ............................................................................................... 21 3.4 Potential evaporation .......................................................................................... 25 3.5 Well levels .......................................................................................................... 31 3.6 Groundwater abstractions and flow augmentation ............................................. 33 4 Data quality control.......................................................................................... 37 4.1 Raingauge data.................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Well level data .................................................................................................... 43 4.3 River level/flow data........................................................................................... 44 5 Strategy for modelling...................................................................................... 49 5.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 49 5.2 Strategy for model assessment............................................................................ 49 5.3 Strategy for model conceptualisation ................................................................. 51 5.4 Hydrogeological support to model conceptualisation ........................................ 54 6 Model application to the Lavant and Ems...................................................... 57 Contents iii 6.1 Model calibration and assessment.......................................................................57 6.2 Model sensitivity analyses ..................................................................................68 6.3 Model recalibration .............................................................................................77 6.4 Forecasting performance.....................................................................................83 6.5 Model performance summary .............................................................................90 7 Summary and recommendations .....................................................................92 7.1 Summary .............................................................................................................92 7.2 Recommendations ...............................................................................................93 7.3 Conclusions and the way forward .......................................................................98 References ......................................................................................................................99 Appendix A Monthly MORECS and MOSES data ............................................102 Appendix B Raingauge data analysis supplementary information ...................103 iv Contents List of Tables Table 1.1 Alarm trigger levels for the Ems at Westbourne .............................................. 2 Table 2.1 Parameters of the standard PDM model ........................................................... 6 Table 2.2 Additional parameters of the extended PDM model ...................................... 12 Table 3.1 Tipping-bucket raingauges in the vicinity of the Lavant and Ems catchments. Height and SAAR (Standard Average Annual Rainfall) are taken from CEH datasets.................................................................................................................... 15 Table 3.2 Met Office daily raingauge records (available at CEH). ................................ 16 Table 3.3 Details of the best radar data available over the catchments. ......................... 18 Table 3.4 Long-term ratio biases using Nimrod composite radar data over the period 21 November 2003 to 30 September 2008. ................................................................. 19 Table 3.5 River level/flow stations in the Lavant and Ems catchments ......................... 21 Table 3.6 Long-term monthly average MORECS PE amounts for square 183 over the 1971-2007 water years (using MORECS records held at CEH). ........................... 26 Table 3.7 Differences between the annual MORECS PE/AE totals derived from data held by the Environment Agency and CEH for MORECS square 183 and the period 1971-2007.................................................................................................... 26 Table 3.8 Differences between the monthly MORECS PE, AE, rainfall and SMD data held by the Environment Agency and CEH for MORECS square 183 and the period 1961-2007. Shading indicates values which are different........................... 27 Table 3.9 Groundwater well level stations in the Lavant and Ems catchments ............. 32 Table 3.10 Well level data supplied by the Environment Agency. ................................ 33 Table 3.11 Groundwater abstraction sites in the Lavant and Ems catchments............... 34 Table 3.12 Details of the daily abstraction and flow augmentation data provided by the Environment Agency. ............................................................................................. 35 Table 3.13 Water year abstractions and flow augmentation for the Ems. ...................... 35 Table 4.1 Tipping-bucket raingauges in the vicinity of the Lavant and Ems catchments: start dates of data provided. .................................................................................... 41 Table 4.2 Sets of linear raingauge weights for the Lavant and Ems catchments derived using the integrated multiquadric method. ............................................................. 42 Table 4.3 Periods when the flow of the Ems at Westbourne is above the upper limit of the rating curve. ...................................................................................................... 47 Table 6.1 Summary of main differences in the approach and datasets used to calibrate the extended PDM for the Lavant between the Moore-Bell calibration (2002) and the project calibration. ............................................................................................ 57 Table 6.2 Extended PDM model parameters for the Lavant and Ems catchments. ....... 59 Table 6.3 R2 and rmse statistics for flow in the Lavant and well levels at West Dean Nursery.................................................................................................................... 60 Table 6.4 PDM model water balances (mm total) for the Lavant over the calibration and evaluation periods. In brackets is the output component as a fraction of the rainfall input. ....................................................................................................................... 63 Table 6.5 R2 and rmse statistics for flow in the Ems and well level at Pitlands Farm ... 65 Table 6.6 PDM model water balances (mm total) for the Ems over the calibration
Recommended publications
  • Supplement to Agenda Agenda Supplement for Cabinet, 04/10
    Public Document Pack JOHN WARD East Pallant House Head of Finance and Governance Services 1 East Pallant Chichester Contact: Graham Thrussell on 01243 534653 West Sussex Email: [email protected] PO19 1TY Tel: 01243 785166 www.chichester.gov.uk A meeting of Cabinet will be held in Committee Room 1 at East Pallant House Chichester on Tuesday 4 October 2016 at 09:30 MEMBERS: Mr A Dignum (Chairman), Mrs E Lintill (Vice-Chairman), Mr R Barrow, Mr B Finch, Mrs P Hardwick, Mrs G Keegan and Mrs S Taylor SUPPLEMENT TO THE AGENDA 9 Review of Character Appraisal and Management Proposals for Selsey Conservations Area and Implementation of Associated Recommendations Including Designation of a New Conservation Area in East Selsey to be Named Old Selsey (pages 1 to 12) In section 14 of the report for this agenda item lists three background papers: (1) Former Executive Board Report on Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals, Article 4 Directions and programme for future work - 8 September 2009 (in the public domain). (2) Representation form Selsey Town Council asking Chichester District Council to de-designate the Selsey conservation area (3) Selsey Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2007 (in the public domain). These papers are available to view as follows: (1) is attached herewith (2) has been published as part of the agenda papers for this meeting (3) is available on Chichester District Council’s website via this link: http://www.chichester.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=5298&p=0 http://www.chichester.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=5299&p=0 Agenda Item 9 Agenda Item no: 8 Chichester District Council Executive Board Tuesday 8th September 2009 Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals, Article 4 Directions and programme for future work 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSSEX. [ K~Lt~'S
    4 SUSSEX. [ K~Lt~'s UCKFIELD UNION. Rape W. Pevensey. Buxted Little Horsted Hundred of .AJciston :-Alciston, .Alfriston and Lul­ Danebill Maresfield lil'lgton. East Hoathly Mayfield Hundred of Bis~opstone :-Bishops-tone and Denton. ~el- Fletching Rotherfield Hundred of Danehi:l Horsted : -Horsted Kevnes,• Framfield Uckfield meston and Tarring Neville or East Tarring. Isfield Waldron Hundred of Dill :-Hailsham and He:lingley. Hundred of Eastbourne :-Eastbourne. WESTBOURNE UNION. Hundred of East Gri'nstead :-East Grinst.ead. Bosham Racton Hundred of F:exborough :-East Blatchington, Sea- Chidham Stoughton ford and South Heighton. Compton Up Marden Hundred of Hartfield :-Hartfield and Withyham. East Marden W estbour&e Hundred of Lindfield :-Bur:eigh .Arches. Funtington West De1n Hundred of Longbridge :-Arlington, Berwick, Folking­ North Marden West Thorney ton, Littlingto'n and Wilmingt<Jn. Hundred of Loxfie:d Camden :- Lamberhurst (part WEsT FIRLE UNION. of), Mayfield and Wadhurst. Hundred of Loxfield-Dorset :-Buxted, Framfie:d. Is­ Amalgamated with Lewes, Hailsham & Eastbourne. field anrl U ckfield. Liberty of Lowey of Pevensey :-Pevensey andWestham WESTHAMPNETT UNION. Hundred of Ringmer :-Glynde, Ringmer, South Mal­ Aldingbourne Middleton ling and Stanmer. Appledram New Fishbourne Hu'ndred of Rotherfie:d :-Frant and Rot'herfield Barnham North Mundham Hundred of Rus~1monden :-F:etching, Little Hor­ Binderton OV"ing stead and Maresfield. Binsted Pagham Hundred of Shiplake :-Chalvington, Chiddingly, Bast Birdham Rumboldswyke Hoathly or Easthothly, Laughton, Ripe and Waldron. Bognor Selsey Hundred of Totnore :-Beddington and West Firle. Boxgrove Sidlesbam Hundred of Willingdon :-East Dean, Friston, Jeving­ Donnington Singleton ton, West Dean and Willingdon. Earnley Slindon The fol:owing are the rapes and hundreds in the Eartbam South Bersted Western division:- East Dean Tangmere Eastergat.e Up Waltham Rape of Arundel.
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council
    Chichester District Council Planning Committee Wednesday 02 October 2019 Report of the Director Of Planning and Environment Services Schedule of Planning Appeals, Court and Policy Matters Between 16-Aug-2019 and 16- Sep-2019 This report updates Planning Committee members on current appeals and other matters. It would be of assistance if specific questions on individual cases could be directed to officers in advance of the meeting. Note for public viewing via Chichester District Council web siteTo read each file in detail, including the full appeal decision when it is issued, click on the reference number (NB certain enforcement cases are not open for public inspection, but you will be able to see the key papers via the automatic link to the Planning Inspectorate). * - Committee level decision. 1. NEW APPEALS (Lodged) Reference/Procedure Proposal 19/00350/LBC Hardings Farm Selsey Road Donnington Chichester West Donnington Parish Sussex PO20 7PU - Replacement of 8 no. windows to North, East and South Elevations (like for like). Case Officer: Maria Tomlinson Written Representation 18/00187/CONMHC Fisher Granary Fisher Lane South Mundham Chichester North Mundham Parish West Sussex PO20 1ND - Appeal against NM/29 Case Officer: Tara Lang Written Representation 18/00100/CONCOU Northshore Yacht Limited The Street Itchenor Chichester West Itchenor Parish West Sussex PO20 7AY - Appeal against WI/16 Case Officer: Steven Pattie Written Representation 19/00405/FUL Fisher Granary Fisher Lane South Mundham PO20 1ND - North Mundham Parish Use of land for the stationing of a caravan for use as a holiday let. Case Officer: Caitlin Boddy Written Representation 19/00046/CONCOU Kellys Farm Bell Lane Birdham Chichester West Sussex Birdham Parish PO20 7HY – Appeal against BI/46 Case Officer: Steven Pattie Written Representation 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchyards Visited in West Sussex
    LIST OF CHURCHYARDS VISITED IN WEST SUSSEX Recorders: PLACE CHURCH GRID REF LINK TO FURTHER INFORMATION Peter Norton YEAR Tim Hills Albourne St Bartholemew TQ2567616160 Gazetteer TH 2011 Aldingbourne St Mary the Virgin SU92340547 Gazetteer - lost yew TH/PN 1999 Aldwick St Richard SZ909990 No yews PN 2011/14 Amberley St Michael TQ02781317 Gazetteer TH/PN 2004 Owen Angmering St Margaret TQ06700433 Gazetteer 2009 Johnson/PN Apuldram St Mary the Virgin SU841033 No yews PN 2011/14 Ardingly St Peter TQ33972981 Gazetteer TH/PN 2000 Barlavington St Mary SU97201610 Younger yews PN 1992 Barnham St Mary SU956035 No yews PN 2011/14 Bepton St Mary SU854183 Younger yews PN 2011/14 Bignor The Holy Cross SU98251467 Gazetteer TH/PN 1999 Binsted St Mary SU983060 No yews PN 2011/14 Birdham St James SU82380030 Gazetteer - lost yew TH 2000 Bognor Regis St Wilfrid SZ927989 No yews PN 2011/14 Bolney St Mary Magdalene TQ262226 Gazetteer - lost yew PN 2011/14 Bosham Holy Trinity SU804039 No yews PN 2011/14 Boxgrove St Mary & St Blaise SU908075 No yews PN 2011/14 Broadbridge Heath St John TQ148314 No yews PN 2011/14 Broadfield Christ the Lord TQ259346 No yews PN 2011/14 Broadwater Hosanna TQ150046 No yews PN 2011/14 Burgess Hill St Andrew TQ320195 No yews PN 2011/14 Burton (Park) St Richard SU967175 No yews PN 2011/14 Bury St John the Evangelist TQ01661308 Gazetteer PN 2012 Camelsdale St Paul SU887325 No yews PN 2011/14 Chichester St Wilfrid SU853052 No yews PN 2011/14 Chidham St Mary SU788039 Younger yews PN 2011/14 Climping (Clymping) St Mary the Virgin TQ002025
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2018
    Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2018/2023 2nd draft July 2017 www.chichester.gov.uk/planningpolicy 1 Contents Page No. Foreword 3 1. Purpose of the Infrastructure Business Plan 4 2. Infrastructure Projects 5-17 3. CIL Implementation Plan 18-22 4. CIL Cash flow and Spending Plan 23-26 5. Conclusions 27 Appendices A. Full Infrastructure Project list City, Town & Parish Projects 29-66 Chichester District Council Projects 67-81 West Sussex County Council Projects 81-99 Infrastructure Commissioners Projects 100-107 B. CIL Applicable Housing Trajectories 108-114 C. Infrastructure Prioritisation Process, Monitoring & Governance 115-121 D. Funding Source Review 122-138 E. Project Pro-forma 139 F. Regulation 123 list 140-141 G. IBP Glossary 142 2 Foreword This Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) covers the Chichester Local Plan area, it excludes parts of the district that fall within the South Downs National Park because the South Downs National Park Authority is responsible for this area. Local communities are frequently concerned that the provision of infrastructure (by which we mean roads, flood defences, schools, doctors’ surgeries, children’s playgrounds etc.) does not keep pace with the rate of new house building. One purpose of the IBP is to ensure that infrastructure is provided at the right time and in the right place so that this problem does not get worse in the future. Infrastructure can be paid for in several different ways, for example: Customer bills – to telephone and broadband companies and water companies to supply fresh water and to take away and treat wastewater. Government grants, to help provide school places (or other grant sources from Europe or the Local Economic Partnership).
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District - Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals Annex 1
    Chichester District - Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals Annex 1 South Downs Date Management No Area Extended Area CA Appraisal NP Boundary Proposal Designated Proposals (Y/N) 1 Bepton 14.11.84 6.1 Y Low priority 2 Bignor 14.11.84 7.66 Y Low priority 3 Bosham 06.10.69 10.06.08 17.6 March 2007 March 2007 N Not a priority 4 Boxgrove 14.01.81 N Prioritise for commissioning a 9.87 CACA & MP 5 Bury 14.11.84 17.09 Y Not a priority 6 Byworth (Petworth) 14.11.84 4.37 Y Not a priority Camelsdale and 14.11.84 Y and N Hammer (Springhead) Not a Priority (Linchmere & Waverley B.C.) - No 63 7.98 7 Charlton (Singleton) 03.09.73 6.9 Y Not a priority 8 Chichester 16.03.70 [Westgate and 14.01.81 Other] 126.7 March 2005 March 2005 Review due in 2010 [Canal Basin] 25.09.90 N [College Lane] 15.11.94 10.06.08 9 Coates (Fittleworth) 14.11.84 2.44 Y Not a priority 10 Cocking (Cocking & 14.11.84 Y Not a priority Heyshott) 10.9 11 Compton 03.09.73 8.27 Y Not a priority 12 Dell Quay (Appledram) 04.02.76 10.06.08 September September N Review due in 2011 1.8 2006 2006 South Downs Date Management No Area Extended Area CA Appraisal NP Boundary Proposal Designated Proposals (Y/N) 13 Donnington 02.06.76 10.06.08 September September N Review due in 2011 3.15 2006 2006 14 Duncton 14.11.84 3.8 Y Not a priority 15 Earnley 04.02.76 10.06.08 September September N Review due in 2011 3.68 2006 2006 16 Eartham 03.09.73 5.47 Y Not a priority 17 Easebourne 17.07.74 17.56 Y Not a priority 18 East and Mid Lavant 14.01.81 Y Not a priority (Lavant) 25.6 19 East Ashling 14.01.81 Y Not a priority (Funtington) 7.3 20 East Dean 03.09.73 10.14 Y Not a priority 21 East Harting (Harting) 14.11.84 13.64 Y Not a priority 22 East Marden (Marden) 03.09.73 5.68 Y Not a priority 23 Elsted 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Giles Jollands Architect ©
    ! ! Note: Scheme for illustrative purposes only & subject to site survey and measurement N approx area 440 sq m A May 2015 Pre App Revision Date + Notes GILES JOLLANDS ARCHITECT North Marden, Chichester, PO18 9JU 01243 535 444 [email protected] Project LAND AT LINESIDE WAY LITTLEHAMPTON Drawing PROPOSED HOUSES SKETCH SCHEME LOCATION & BLOCK PLANS SITE LOCATION PLAN - 1:1250 PLAN SHOWING 2 No HOUSES OF APPROX 100 SQ M GIA Project Ref Dwg No Revision WITH 3 PARKING SPACES -1:500 15.20 101 A Scale(s) @ Sheet Size 1:1250/500 A3 © COPYRIGHT EXISTS ON ALL DESIGN AND INFORMATION SHOWN ! This drawing is not to be scaled. The architect is to be informed of any discrepancies before work proceeds. The general contractor is responsible for checking all dimensions ! ADJOINING PROPERTY GARDEN .07 Note: Scheme for illustrative 30 purposes only & subject to site survey and measurement .18 30 .34 30 70 sq m .13 30 .51 30 .36 30 GARDEN ROUGH GRASS 10300 N GRASS .03 30 .16 30 .30 10700 HOUSE30 B .63 .41 30 30 102 sq m GIA 93 sq m A May 2015 Pre App Revision Date + Notes .03 .18 30 30 .24 30 GILES JOLLANDS .19 30 .39 .33 30 30 ARCHITECT North Marden, Chichester, PO18 9JU 01243 535 444 .04 HOUSE A [email protected] 30 GRASS 102 sq m GIA .08 30 Project LAND AT LINESIDE WAY .98 29 parking LITTLEHAMPTON .20 30 Drawing drive PROPOSED HOUSES .25 30 SKETCH SCHEME ROUGH GRASS .86 PROPOSED LAYOUT .78 29 29 .44 .06 30 30 GARDENS Project Ref Dwg No Revision ACCESS TO .86 REAR 29 A .67 15.20 102 GARDENS 29 bins Scale(s) @ Sheet Size ADJOINING PROPERTY .95 29 1:100 A3 COPYRIGHT EXISTS ON ALL DESIGN AND INFORMATION SHOWN .08 GULLY 30 © .94 29 This drawing is not to be scaled.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex. Mahehield
    DIRECTORY.] SUSSEX. MAHEHIELD. 519 and held since 1904 by the Rev. Hector William Grepe Sexton, Frank Collins. M.A. of Pernbnke Colle~e, Cambridge. Dale Park, Wall Letter Box cleared at ILI5 a.m. & 5 p.m.; sun- standing in an extensive and 'well-wooced estate, is the days, u a.m. L"'tters throu~h Arundel arrinJ-afl IY. seat of Charles John FletC'her Psq. D.L., J.P. lord of the a.m. & 2 p.m. The nearest money. order & telegvaph manor and sole landowner. The soil is chalk;. subsoil, office is at Slindon chalk and fi'nt. The chief crops are wheat, barley ~ublic Elementary School (mix~}, built in r86o, for and oa.ts. The area is 1,Bg1 acres; assessable value, 49 children; average attendance, 30; Mrs. Elizabeth £1, r68 ; the population in 1901 was 192. Mary Pierce, mistress PRIVATE RESIDENTS. Sawyer Harcourt, Lower farm lSpemeley William, head keeper tJ! Fl.etcher Chas. John D.L., J.P.Dale pk COMMERCIAL. Charles J. Fletcher e.sq. D.L., J.P Grepe Rev. Hector William M.A. Batho Alfred, stud groom . Walters Jane (Miss), dress maker (vicar), Vicnage Smith Clement, resident agent to Woodford Frederick, farm bailiff t~ Majoribanks Miss, Madehnrst lodge Charles J. Fletcher esq. D.L., J.P Charles J. Fletcher e.sq. D.L., J.P MALLING SOUTH, formerly one civil parish, has, and Without, the former being that part of the ollfT under the provisions of the "Local Government Act, parish comprised within the municipal borongh of 1894," been divided into two, respectively named Within Lewes; names of residPnts are all given with that town.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 19/01716/PA3Q South Mundham Farm South Mundham Chichester West Sussex PO20 1LU Notification for Prior Approval for a Proposed
    NORTH MUNDHAM PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE Agenda for the Extra Ordinary Planning Committee Meeting to be held on 16th July 2019 North Mundham Parish Council 1 Charlmead, East Wittering, Chichester, West Sussex, PO20 8DN Tel: 01243 203050 Email: [email protected] Website: www.northmundham.org MEETING OF NORTH MUNDHAM PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE I hereby give notice that a meeting of North Mundham Parish Council Extra Ordinary Planning Committee is to be held on 16th July 2019 commencing at 18.45 in the Small Hall at North Mundham Village Centre and all members of the Committee are summoned to attend. Signed: T. Russell Chairman North Mundham Parish Council Dated: 11th July 2019 P94.19 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME – this is limited to ten minutes to allow member of the public to a) make representation b) answer questions or c) give evidence relating to business to be transacted (the public are welcome to stay and observe the rest of the meeting) P95.19 APOLOGIES AND REASON FOR ABSENCE P96.19 CODE OF CONDUCT 1. Declaration of Interest of items included on the agenda. 2. Dispensation Request P97.19 MINUTES – to agree and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 2nd July 2019 P98.19 PLANNING APPLICATIONS (including any applications received following publication of the agenda) 19/01716/PA3Q South Mundham Farm South Mundham Chichester West Sussex PO20 1LU Notification for Prior Approval for a Proposed Change of Use Agricultural Building to 2 no. Dwelling houses (Class C3) and for Associated Operational Development. https://publicaccess.chichester.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=PTYNPPER0PD00 19/01714/PA3Q South Mundham Farm South Mundham PO20 1LU Notification for Prior Approval for a Proposed Change of Use Agricultural Building to 3 no.
    [Show full text]
  • Moments of Definition, Redefinition and Transition in the English Parish Church 1500-1700
    Veiled Assent, Hidden Dissension: Moments of Definition, Redefinition and Transition in the English Parish Church 1500-1700 Jude Jones Looking at the moment is an enormously difficult task. Which moment is it exactly? How long does it last? Does it occur as a point in time synchronously or is it the product of a more diachronic synthesis – the distillation of a series of moments of existence? Is it the point at which everyone still remaining in Pompeii was overcome by the fumes from the eruption pouring down from Vesuvius? Or did it last from the point at which the volcano started to erupt until the minute of the last Pompeian’s death? Could that moment include the thick showers of ash which covered the dying, burying them under deep strata? Might it even include the long aeons of time until they were discovered and reconstructed from the remains left in the consolidated ash? How long is a moment? Archaeologists are taught to see time as either synchronic or diachronic: seemingly momentary events like the eruption of Vesuvius or long term slabs of time. We often present time in binary oppositions – the short which equals change and the long which equals continuity. Thus, is the question of how long a moment lasts better left to expert philosophers, or is it possible to quantify the length of a moment then perhaps to qualify it? Or, better still, is it possible to try to characterise and define the idea of the moment by examining its constituents and its impact? To this end, it might be worth contextualising a short series of past moments to see how long they lasted and who and what was engaged in them as they occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17 APRIL, 1925. 2621 Rural District of Thakeham
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17 APRIL, 1925. 2621 Rural District of Thakeham. Road from the Ernsworth—Chichester road Road from the road junction about 500 yards at Old Fishbourne via Old Park, Stonewall south of Nutbourne via Stream Farm to the Farm, Church Farm and Dunmere Pond to its road junction near the Windmill, West C'hil- junction with Bosham Lane at Miles's Farm. tington. Clay Lane from the Funtington—Broad- Eoad from the road junction near the Post bridge road near Ratham Mill via Double Barn Office, West Chiltington, \ia.Vaux Grange to and Polthooks to the rural district boundary at its junction with the Thakeham—Coolham road the cross roads south of Salthill Farm. at Picketty. Road from Clay Lane near Bethwines to Gray's Lane from the road junction near its junction with the Emsworth—Chichester St. Mary's Church, Thakeham., to its junction road at Old Fishbo'urne. with Goosegreen Lane near Bowford Farm. Road from the road junction about 200 yards Road from the Amberley—Storrington road north-east of the Post Office, Funtington, to via Rackham Farm to the road junction about the rural district boundary at Holland's Field 300 yards south of Rackham. School. toward West Stoke. Road from London Road, Pulborough, via Road from the Funtington—East Ashling Old Place to the road junction about 300 yards road at the Congregational Chapel, East south-east of Pythingdean. Ashling, to its junction with the Funtington— Road from Stane Street at Codmore Hill to West Stoke road at Woodend. the road junction about 300 yards south-east Road from the Midhurst—Chichester road at of Pythingdean.
    [Show full text]
  • Honer Barn South Mundham, West Sussex
    Honer Barn South Mundham, West Sussex . _ f Honer Barn A superbly renovated and substantial barn conversion situated towards the end of a country lane within just over an acre of grounds and magnificent views to Pagham Harbour. Guide Price £1,500,000, subject to contract Gross Internal Area 3,645 sq ft / 338.6 sq m GROUND FLOOR • Entrance Lobby / Boot Room • Guest Bedroom (en suite) • Superb open plan • 2 Further Double Drawing Room / Kitchen Bedrooms • Dining Room • Family Bathroom • Sitting / Family Room • Plant / Services Store • Utility Room • Cloakroom • Rear Lobby FIRST FLOOR • Main Bedroom (en suite bathroom) GARDEN AND GROUNDS ANNEXE • Driveway with extensive parking • Studio / Bedroom • Delightful Landscaped Gardens • en suite Shower Room • Veranda / Covered Dining Area • Courtyard • Al Fresco BBQ Kitchen • Workshop (with electric) • Garage Block (two car ports / enclosed garage / dry log store) The Property Believed to date back to the 1800's and having recently undergone a substantial programme of renovation throughout, Honer Barn is a superbly presented family home situated within stunning rural surrounds. The property provides a warm, light and airy atmosphere, accompanied with versatile accommodation and an exacting standard of finish. A particular feature and ideal for entertaining, is the large double height open plan Kitchen/Drawing Room with vaulted ceiling, Aga and full height glazed double doors leading out both to the courtyard in the east and out to the garden to the west. Underfloor heating is also provided. The adjoining dual aspect Dining Room with wood burning stove has double doors opening out to a west-facing covered veranda with distant views across adjoining farmland.
    [Show full text]