Stanley Kubrick: Producers and Production Companies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stanley Kubrick: Producers and Production Companies Stanley Kubrick: Producers and Production Companies Thesis submitted by James Fenwick In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy De Montfort University, September 2017 1 Abstract This doctoral thesis examines filmmaker Stanley Kubrick’s role as a producer and the impact of the industrial contexts upon the role and his independent production companies. The thesis represents a significant intervention into the understanding of the much-misunderstood role of the producer by exploring how business, management, working relationships and financial contexts influenced Kubrick’s methods as a producer. The thesis also shows how Kubrick contributed to the transformation of industrial practices and the role of the producer in Hollywood, particularly in areas of legal authority, promotion and publicity, and distribution. The thesis also assesses the influence and impact of Kubrick’s methods of producing and the structure of his production companies in the shaping of his own reputation and brand of cinema. The thesis takes a case study approach across four distinct phases of Kubrick’s career. The first is Kubrick’s early years as an independent filmmaker, in which he made two privately funded feature films (1951-1955). The second will be an exploration of the Harris-Kubrick Pictures Corporation and its affiliation with Kirk Douglas’ Bryna Productions (1956-1962). Thirdly, the research will examine Kubrick’s formation of Hawk Films and Polaris Productions in the 1960s (1962-1968), with a deep focus on the latter and the vital role of vice-president of the company. Finally, the research will move to examine the Jan Harlan years (1975-1999), a period in which Kubrick’s production rate slowed markedly. The thesis utilises the methodological framework of the New Film History and draws heavily on archival material. It also develops the historiography of Kubrick, the American film industry, and the role of the producer, with significant critical engagement with the work of Peter Krämer, Robert Sklar, and Andrew Spicer. Asking what Kubrick’s role was as a producer allows for a fuller understanding of the way in which he obtained control of his productions, as well as the industrial limitations and constraints in which he produced (or failed to produce) his films. 2 Contents Abstract 2 Acknowledgements 5 List of Images and Tables 6 Notes on Text 7 Introduction 8 - Thesis Context 10 - Biographical Context 13 - Literature Review 21 - Defining the Producer 35 - Approach and Methodology 38 - Thesis Structure 44 Chapter One 48 ‘Nobody’s going to get anything out of this movie but me’: The Emergence of a Film Producer 1953-1955 - Kubrick the Guerrilla Producer: Minotaur Productions and Killer’s Kiss 49 - The Transformation of Modes of Production: Kubrick and the New York Group 58 - Conclusion 66 Chapter Two 69 The Harris-Kubrick Pictures Corporation and the Diversification of the Package-Unit System 1955-1962 - James B. Harris: The Boy Wonder 71 - The Killing, Exploitation, and Art House Cinema 73 - Management and Administration at the Harris-Kubrick Pictures Corporation 83 - Lolita and the Diversification of the Harris-Kubrick Pictures Corporation 89 - Conclusion 99 Chapter Three 102 ‘If you don’t have legal authority, you don’t have any authority at all’: New Modes of Producing in Hollywood 1957-1965 - New Modes of Producing 103 - Levels of Autonomy on Paths of Glory 106 - Lew Wasserman’s Monopolisation of the Package-Unit System 118 - Determining Control of Spartacus 123 - Conclusion 129 3 Chapter Four 132 Spheres of Influence: Polaris Productions and 2001: A Space Odyssey - ‘The Day of the Merchandiser Has Come’: Industrial Contexts 134 - Polaris Productions: A Producing Powerhouse 138 - When Spheres of Influence Collide: Polaris versus MGM 143 - Polaris versus Kubrick: Exploiting the Future 150 - Conclusion 160 Chapter Five 163 Producing a Kubrick Feature in the New Hollywood 1968-1980 - Industrial Contexts: Kubrick, Warner Bros. and Absolute Control 165 - Producing A Clockwork Orange 174 - Brand Kubrick 180 - Conclusion 192 Chapter Six 194 Kubrick versus the Super Producers - Empyrean Films 197 - Kubrick and Spielberg 203 - Perpetual Pre-Production: The Case of Aryan Papers 207 - Conclusion 215 Conclusion 217 Appendix I: Transcript of Interview with James B. Harris 224 Appendix II: Transcript of Interview with Jan Harlan 251 Appendix III: Statement of Profit and Loss, Minotaur Productions 269 Bibliography 271 - Books, Articles, and Reports 271 - Unpublished and Archival Sources 300 Filmography 312 4 Acknowledgements This research project was made possible by the generous research scholarship, the Vice Chancellor’s High Flyers Award, awarded to me by De Montfort University and for which I am extraordinarily grateful. I would also like to thank the European Association for American Studies for the generous Transatlantic Travel Grant they awarded me in order to conduct a research visit to the Kirk Douglas Papers housed at the Wisconsin Historical Society in Madison. I would like to thank the following people for their help and advice throughout this PhD. Ian Hunter and Jim Russell for their supervision and guidance; the staff at the Stanley Kubrick Archive, University of the Arts London for their endless support and for fetching me countless boxes, including Richard Daniels, Sarah Mahurter, Georgia Clemson, Sarah Cox, Elizabeth Thurlow, and the many archive volunteers I have encountered there over the years; the archival staff at the Wisconsin Historical Society for providing me access to the Kirk Douglas Papers and in particular the help of Mary Huelsbeck; Kristine Krueger of the Margaret Herrick Library for her support and research assistance; the staff of the National Archives; the archival staff at the University of Liverpool who guided me around the Brian Aldiss Papers; and the staff of the British Library for providing me with access to the Harold Pinter Papers. Thanks also to Laura Mee for pointing me in the right direction during the early days of this project; to Chris Corker for the much needed “PhD rants” in Marmadukes; to my mum, Julie Pigott, and dad, John Fenwick, for their continued support; and to Nash Sibanda for being the best drinking and travelling buddy a PhD student could have. A special thank you to Jan Harlan, who it has been a pleasure to get to know and who has provided me with many contacts and stories of his time working with Kubrick, and to Mrs Harlan for hosting me over a wonderful meal. And a special thank you to James B. Harris for allowing me the lengthy telephone calls and regaling me with stories about his friendship and working relationship with Kubrick, and the chance to talk about one of my favourite films ever, Cop (1988). And finally a big thank you to the staff of the Soar Point: there was always a cold Blue Moon waiting. 5 List of Images and Tables Figure 1: p. 9 List of credited producers on films that Stanley Kubrick directed 1951-1999 Figure 2: p. 77 The advert placed by Harris and Kubrick against the wishes of United Artists (Anon. 1956a: 17). Figure 3: p. 116 Posters for Paths of Glory (1957) and Attack (1956) displaying clear similarities. Figure 4: p. 142 Vice-presidents of Polaris Productions Inc., 1962-1973. Figure 5: p. 148 MGM’s press kit for The V.I.P.s, coordinated by Dan Terrell (Steen 1963: b1) Figure 6: p. 157 Wedgwood ashtray used in the promotion of 2001: A Space Odyssey (Anon. 2009). Figure 7: p. 190 The 1972 front cover of Newsweek, the photograph of which Kubrick staged himself. The article said Kubrick had an ‘inexhaustible drive to orchestrate the smallest details’ (Zimmerman 1972: 28). 6 Notes On Text Where the website boxofficemojo.com is referred to for box office figures, this is indicated in text by only the website name for presentation purposes. Full URL references can be found in the bibliography. Similarly, this applies to the website creativeskillset.org. Where email correspondence is cited, this will be indicated in text. British spelling is used throughout, except in quotations where American spelling is used. Years of release are given only on the first mention of a film, with an alphabetised filmography giving full details. 7 Introduction Following his time spent as director on the historical epic Spartacus (1960), Stanley Kubrick (1928-1999) tried to put as much distance as possible between him and the film, seeing it as decidedly un-Kubrickian. Speaking over a decade later, Kubrick said that the key lesson he took from the production was the need for what he called legal authority: ‘If you don’t have legal authority, you don’t have any authority at all’ (Zimmerman 1972: 32). The legal authority on Spartacus resided with its producers, the all-powerful Hollywood actor-producer Kirk Douglas (who also played the eponymous tragic-hero), and the Bryna Productions producer, Edward Lewis, with Kubrick being a director-for-hire after the firing of Anthony Mann just two weeks into the shoot. To ensure Kubrick kept in line, the film’s financial backer, Universal, assigned an assistant director, Marshall Green, to keep a watchful eye over Kubrick and to make certain he kept to schedule (LoBrutto 1997: 181). Universal and the film’s producers were making it clear that Kubrick had no legal authority. By 1961, Kubrick was sitting with his lawyer, Louis C. Blau, and Kirk Douglas negotiating his way out of his contract with Douglas’s Bryna Productions (193), with the intent of continuing his ‘ongoing quest for ever greater control’ (229) – to be his own producer. And being his own producer Kubrick was, from 1963 onwards with the dissolving of the Harris-Kubrick Pictures Corporation (HKPC), a nearly seven-year long partnership with producer James B. Harris that had taken Kubrick into the heart of Hollywood and eventually across to the United Kingdom.
Recommended publications
  • Beginnings and Endings in Films, Film and Film Studies
    Beginnings and Endings in Films, Film and Film Studies Beginnings and Endings in Films, Film and Film Studies, University of Warwick, 13th June 2008 A report by Martin Zeller, University of York, UK This conference, organised by Tom Hughes and James MacDowell (both of University of Warwick), examined the beginnings and endings of individual films and structures of beginnings and endings in films more generally, as well as notions of beginning and ending in film studies as a discipline. With such a wide remit it is not surprising that links between the various presentations were sometimes difficult to establish. However, the wide variety of approaches to the topic ensured lively discussions. The tone for the day was set by the keynote paper delivered by Warwick's own V. F. Perkins. Examining beginnings and endings in the genre of 'multi-story' (or portmanteau) movies, Perkins elucidated the various methods used to make the author the focus of these multi-stranded narratives. Drawing on the literary cachet of their source texts, Quartet, Full House and Le Plaisir make Maugham, O. Henry and Maupassant the respective loci around which their stories revolve. Pointing out that authorial intrusions were, with the exception of Le Plaisir, used only at the beginnings of such films, Perkins suggested the possibility of a largely unexplored narrative technique available in returning to the author at the close of a film. However, it was Professor Perkin's call for, 'an aesthetics of the quite good, of the satisfactorily effective, as well as the extremes: the abject and the sublime,' that seemed to resonate most with the delegates and to become a touchstone for the day's later discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Kubrick's 18Th Century
    Stanley Kubrick’s 18th Century: Painting in Motion and Barry Lyndon as an Enlightenment Gallery Alysse Peery Abstract The only period piece by famed Stanley Kubrick, Barry Lyndon, was a 1975 box office flop, as well as the director’s magnum opus. Perhaps one of the most sumptuous and exquisite examples of cinematography to date, this picaresque film effectively recreates the Age of the Enlightenment not merely through facts or events, but in visual aesthetics. Like exploring the past in a museum exhibit, the film has a painterly quality harkening back to the old masters. The major artistic movements that reigned throughout the setting of the story dominate the manner in which Barry Lyndon tells its tale with Kubrick’s legendary eye for detail. Through visual understanding, the once obscure novel by William Makepeace Thackeray becomes a captivating window into the past in a manner similar to the paintings it emulates. In 1975, the famed and monumental director Stanley Kubrick released his one and only box-office flop. A film described as a “coffee table film”, it was his only period piece, based on an obscure novel by William Makepeace Thackeray (Patterson). Ironically, his most forgotten work is now considered his magnum opus by critics, and a complete masterwork of cinematography (BFI, “Art”). A remarkable example of the historical costume drama, it enchants the viewer in a meticulously crafted vision of the Georgian Era. Stanley Kubrick’s film Barry Lyndon encapsulates the painting, aesthetics, and overall feel of the 18th century in such a manner to transform the film into a sort of gallery of period art and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors Tell the Story Master the Craft of Television and Film Directing Directors Tell the Story Master the Craft of Television and Film Directing
    Directors Tell the Story Master the Craft of Television and Film Directing Directors Tell the Story Master the Craft of Television and Film Directing Bethany Rooney and Mary Lou Belli AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Focal Press is an imprint of Elsevier Focal Press is an imprint of Elsevier 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, UK © 2011 Bethany Rooney and Mary Lou Belli. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Oei Thesis Final Final
    ABSTRACT The Cinematography of Closet Memories Robert Oei, M.A. Advisor: Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A. The cinematography of a film heavily influences the audience’s mood and their perception of tension. The way a director of photography uses lights and the camera can enhance or destroy the moments of a film a director has built. Keeping this knowledge in mind, the cinematography of Closet Memories uses film noir lighting, a mixture of handheld and smooth camera work, and other techniques to maintain the emotional content of the film’s scenes. The Cinematography of Closet Memories by Robert Oei, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of Communication David W. Schlueter, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A., Chairperson James Kendrick, Ph.D. DeAnna M. Toten Beard Ph.D. Accepted by the Graduate School May 2013 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School Copyright © 2013 by Robert Oei All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One: Introduction ..................................................................................................1 Chapter Two: Literature Review .........................................................................................6 Chapter Three: Methodology .............................................................................................14 Scene 1 and 2 ........................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Boxoffice Barometer (March 6, 1961)
    MARCH 6, 1961 IN TWO SECTIONS SECTION TWO Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents William Wyler’s production of “BEN-HUR” starring CHARLTON HESTON • JACK HAWKINS • Haya Harareet • Stephen Boyd • Hugh Griffith • Martha Scott • with Cathy O’Donnell • Sam Jaffe • Screen Play by Karl Tunberg • Music by Miklos Rozsa • Produced by Sam Zimbalist. M-G-M . EVEN GREATER IN Continuing its success story with current and coming attractions like these! ...and this is only the beginning! "GO NAKED IN THE WORLD” c ( 'KSX'i "THE Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents GINA LOLLOBRIGIDA • ANTHONY FRANCIOSA • ERNEST BORGNINE in An Areola Production “GO SPINSTER” • • — Metrocolor) NAKED IN THE WORLD” with Luana Patten Will Kuluva Philip Ober ( CinemaScope John Kellogg • Nancy R. Pollock • Tracey Roberts • Screen Play by Ranald Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer pre- MacDougall • Based on the Book by Tom T. Chamales • Directed by sents SHIRLEY MacLAINE Ranald MacDougall • Produced by Aaron Rosenberg. LAURENCE HARVEY JACK HAWKINS in A Julian Blaustein Production “SPINSTER" with Nobu McCarthy • Screen Play by Ben Maddow • Based on the Novel by Sylvia Ashton- Warner • Directed by Charles Walters. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents David O. Selznick's Production of Margaret Mitchell’s Story of the Old South "GONE WITH THE WIND” starring CLARK GABLE • VIVIEN LEIGH • LESLIE HOWARD • OLIVIA deHAVILLAND • A Selznick International Picture • Screen Play by Sidney Howard • Music by Max Steiner Directed by Victor Fleming Technicolor ’) "GORGO ( Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents “GORGO” star- ring Bill Travers • William Sylvester • Vincent "THE SECRET PARTNER” Winter • Bruce Seton • Joseph O'Conor • Martin Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents STEWART GRANGER Benson • Barry Keegan • Dervis Ward • Christopher HAYA HARAREET in “THE SECRET PARTNER” with Rhodes • Screen Play by John Loring and Daniel Bernard Lee • Screen Play by David Pursall and Jack Seddon Hyatt • Directed by Eugene Lourie • Executive Directed by Basil Dearden • Produced by Michael Relph.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema and Pedagogy in France, 1909-1930 Casiana Elena Ionita Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Re
    The Educated Spectator: Cinema and Pedagogy in France, 1909-1930 Casiana Elena Ionita Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2013 Casiana Elena Ionita All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Educated Spectator: Cinema and Pedagogy in France, 1909-1930 Casiana Elena Ionita This dissertation draws on a wide range of sources (including motion pictures, film journals, and essays) in order to analyze the debate over the social and aesthetic role of cinema that took place in France from 1909 to 1930. During this period, as the new medium became the most popular form of entertainment, moralists of all political persuasions began to worry that cinematic representations of illicit acts could provoke social unrest. In response, four groups usually considered antagonistic — republicans, Catholics, Communists, and the first film avant- garde known as the Impressionists — set out to redefine cinema by focusing particularly on shaping film viewers. To do so, these movements adopted similar strategies: they organized lectures and film clubs, published a variety of periodicals, commissioned films for specific causes, and screened commercial motion pictures deemed compatible with their goals. Tracing the history of such projects, I argue that they insisted on educating spectators both through and about cinema. Indeed, each movement sought to teach spectators of all backgrounds how to understand the new medium of cinema while also supporting specific films with particular aesthetic and political goals. Despite their different interests, the Impressionists, republicans, Catholics, and Communists all aimed to create communities of viewers that would learn a certain way of decoding motion pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • National Film Registry
    National Film Registry Title Year EIDR ID Newark Athlete 1891 10.5240/FEE2-E691-79FD-3A8F-1535-F Blacksmith Scene 1893 10.5240/2AB8-4AFC-2553-80C1-9064-6 Dickson Experimental Sound Film 1894 10.5240/4EB8-26E6-47B7-0C2C-7D53-D Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze 1894 10.5240/B1CF-7D4D-6EE3-9883-F9A7-E Rip Van Winkle 1896 10.5240/0DA5-5701-4379-AC3B-1CC2-D The Kiss 1896 10.5240/BA2A-9E43-B6B1-A6AC-4974-8 Corbett-Fitzsimmons Title Fight 1897 10.5240/CE60-6F70-BD9E-5000-20AF-U Demolishing and Building Up the Star Theatre 1901 10.5240/65B2-B45C-F31B-8BB6-7AF3-S President McKinley Inauguration Footage 1901 10.5240/C276-6C50-F95E-F5D5-8DCB-L The Great Train Robbery 1903 10.5240/7791-8534-2C23-9030-8610-5 Westinghouse Works 1904 1904 10.5240/F72F-DF8B-F0E4-C293-54EF-U A Trip Down Market Street 1906 10.5240/A2E6-ED22-1293-D668-F4AB-I Dream of a Rarebit Fiend 1906 10.5240/4D64-D9DD-7AA2-5554-1413-S San Francisco Earthquake and Fire, April 18, 1906 1906 10.5240/69AE-11AD-4663-C176-E22B-I A Corner in Wheat 1909 10.5240/5E95-74AC-CF2C-3B9C-30BC-7 Lady Helen’s Escapade 1909 10.5240/0807-6B6B-F7BA-1702-BAFC-J Princess Nicotine; or, The Smoke Fairy 1909 10.5240/C704-BD6D-0E12-719D-E093-E Jeffries-Johnson World’s Championship Boxing Contest 1910 10.5240/A8C0-4272-5D72-5611-D55A-S White Fawn’s Devotion 1910 10.5240/0132-74F5-FC39-1213-6D0D-Z Little Nemo 1911 10.5240/5A62-BCF8-51D5-64DB-1A86-H A Cure for Pokeritis 1912 10.5240/7E6A-CB37-B67E-A743-7341-L From the Manger to the Cross 1912 10.5240/5EBB-EE8A-91C0-8E48-DDA8-Q The Cry of the Children 1912 10.5240/C173-A4A7-2A2B-E702-33E8-N
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of the Heart and Mind: Three Case Studies in White Identity, Southern Reality, and the Silenced Memories of Mississippi Confederate Dissent, 1860-1979
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Summer 8-2021 Paradoxes of the Heart and Mind: Three Case Studies in White Identity, Southern Reality, and the Silenced Memories of Mississippi Confederate Dissent, 1860-1979 Billy Loper Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Loper, Billy, "Paradoxes of the Heart and Mind: Three Case Studies in White Identity, Southern Reality, and the Silenced Memories of Mississippi Confederate Dissent, 1860-1979" (2021). Master's Theses. 825. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/825 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARADOXES OF THE HEART AND MIND: THREE CASE STUDIES IN WHITE IDENTITY, SOUTHERN REALITY, AND THE SILENCED MEMORIES OF MISSISSIPPI CONFEDERATE DISSENT, 1860-1979 by Billy Don Loper A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Humanities at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by: Susannah J. Ural, Committee Chair Andrew P. Haley Rebecca Tuuri August 2021 COPYRIGHT BY Billy Don Loper 2021 Published by the Graduate School ABSTRACT This thesis is meant to advance scholars understanding of the processes by which various groups silenced the memory of Civil War white dissent in Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • National Film Registry Titles Listed by Release Date
    National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year Title Released Inducted Newark Athlete 1891 2010 Blacksmith Scene 1893 1995 Dickson Experimental Sound Film 1894-1895 2003 Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze 1894 2015 The Kiss 1896 1999 Rip Van Winkle 1896 1995 Corbett-Fitzsimmons Title Fight 1897 2012 Demolishing and Building Up the Star Theatre 1901 2002 President McKinley Inauguration Footage 1901 2000 The Great Train Robbery 1903 1990 Life of an American Fireman 1903 2016 Westinghouse Works 1904 1904 1998 Interior New York Subway, 14th Street to 42nd Street 1905 2017 Dream of a Rarebit Fiend 1906 2015 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire, April 18, 1906 1906 2005 A Trip Down Market Street 1906 2010 A Corner in Wheat 1909 1994 Lady Helen’s Escapade 1909 2004 Princess Nicotine; or, The Smoke Fairy 1909 2003 Jeffries-Johnson World’s Championship Boxing Contest 1910 2005 White Fawn’s Devotion 1910 2008 Little Nemo 1911 2009 The Cry of the Children 1912 2011 A Cure for Pokeritis 1912 2011 From the Manger to the Cross 1912 1998 The Land Beyond the Sunset 1912 2000 Musketeers of Pig Alley 1912 2016 Bert Williams Lime Kiln Club Field Day 1913 2014 The Evidence of the Film 1913 2001 Matrimony’s Speed Limit 1913 2003 Preservation of the Sign Language 1913 2010 Traffic in Souls 1913 2006 The Bargain 1914 2010 The Exploits of Elaine 1914 1994 Gertie The Dinosaur 1914 1991 In the Land of the Head Hunters 1914 1999 Mabel’s Blunder 1914 2009 1 National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year
    [Show full text]
  • A Space Odyssey
    THE JOURNAL OF FILM MUSIC VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, FALL 2007 PAGES 1–34 ISSN 1087-7142 CO P YRIGH T © 2007 THE IN T ERNA T IONAL FILM MUSIC SOCIE T Y , INC . “Stanley Hates This But I Like It!”: North vs. Kubrick on the Music for 2001: A Space Odyssey Paul A. merkley, frsc n 1968 Stanley Kubrick Kubrick’s compilation score and the inadequate for the film. With premiered his landmark controversial rejection of North’s the premiere looming up, I had no time left even to think about I science-fiction film on the music have excited considerable another score being written, dawn of human consciousness discussion in the intervening years. and had I not been able to use and its future.1 2001: A Space Most commentators have based the music I had already selected Odyssey astonished its audience their remarks on the premise that for the temporary tracks I don’t know what I would have done. with elaborate sets, an enigmatic the director became so enamored plot, and stunning music with his “temp track”—the presented “in the open.”2 Instead excerpts of classical music he The composer’s agent phoned Robert O’Brien, the then head of accompanying his imaginative was using as placeholders for the of MGM, to warn him that if and painstakingly processed screen eventual score while filming and I didn’t use his client’s score images with the music that he had doing rough editing—that he could the film would not make its commissioned from the eminent not accept North’s music.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Vadim, BARBARELLA (1968, 98 Minutes)
    3 March 2015 (Series 30:6) Roger Vadim, BARBARELLA (1968, 98 minutes) Directed by Roger Vadim Written by Jean-Claude Forest (comic), Claude Brulé, Terry Southern (screenplay), Roger Vadim (screenplay), Vittorio Bonicelli, Clement Biddle Wood, Brian Degas, and Tudor Gates Produced by Dino De Laurentiis Music by Charles Fox Cinematography by Claude Renoir Film Editing by Victoria Mercanton Production Design by Mario Garbuglia Costume Design by Jacques Fonteray and Paco Rabanne Jane Fonda ... Barbarella John Phillip Law ... Pygar Anita Pallenberg ... The Great Tyrant Milo O'Shea ... Concierge / Durand-Durand Marcel Marceau ... Professor Ping Games, 1976 Une femme fidèle, 1974 La jeune fille assassinée, Claude Dauphin ... President of Earth 1973 Don Juan (Or If Don Juan Were a Woman), 1972 Hellé, Véronique Vendell ... Captain Moon 1971 Pretty Maids All in a Row, 1968 Barbarella, 1966 The Giancarlo Cobelli Game Is Over, 1964 Circle of Love, 1963 Vice and Virtue, 1962 Serge Marquand ... Captain Sun Love on a Pillow, 1961 Please, Not Now!, 1960 Blood and Nino Musco Roses, 1959 Les liaisons dangereuses, 1958 The Night Heaven Franco Gulà Fell, 1957 No Sun in Venice, and 1956 ...And God Created Catherine Chevallier ... Stomoxys Woman. Marie Therese Chevallier ... Glossina Umberto Di Grazia Terry Southern (writer, screenplay) (b. May 1, 1924 in David Hemmings ... Dildano Alvarado, Texas—d. October 29, 1995 (age 71) in New York Ugo Tognazzi ... Mark Hand City, New York) wrote 18 films and television shows, which are Vita Borg ... La magicienne 2007 Terry Southern's Plums and Prunes, 2004 Heavy Put-Away, Chantal Cachin ... La révolutionnaire 1998 Terry Southern Interviews a Faggot Male Nurse, 1988 The Fabienne Fabre ..
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Mental Illness in Women in Post-Classical Hollywood
    FRAMING FEMININITY AS INSANITY: REPRESENTATIONS OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN WOMEN IN POST-CLASSICAL HOLLYWOOD Kelly Kretschmar, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: Harry M. Benshoff, Major Professor Sandra Larke-Walsh, Committee Member Debra Mollen, Committee Member Ben Levin, Program Coordinator Alan B. Albarran, Chair of the Department of Radio, Television and Film Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Kretschmar, Kelly, Framing Femininity as Insanity: Representations of Mental Illness in Women in Post-Classical Hollywood. Master of Arts (Radio, Television, and Film), May 2007, 94 pp., references, 69 titles. From the socially conservative 1950s to the permissive 1970s, this project explores the ways in which insanity in women has been linked to their femininity and the expression or repression of their sexuality. An analysis of films from Hollywood’s post-classical period (The Three Faces of Eve (1957), Lizzie (1957), Lilith (1964), Repulsion (1965), Images (1972) and 3 Women (1977)) demonstrates the societal tendency to label a woman’s behavior as mad when it does not fit within the patriarchal mold of how a woman should behave. In addition to discussing the social changes and diagnostic trends in the mental health profession that define “appropriate” female behavior, each chapter also traces how the decline of the studio system and rise of the individual filmmaker impacted the films’ ideologies with regard to mental illness and femininity. Copyright 2007 by Kelly Kretschmar ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 Historical Perspective ........................................................................ 5 Women and Mental Illness in Classical Hollywood ...............................
    [Show full text]