Appendix B Intact Ship Information Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix B Intact Ship Information Information info_mart S0300-A8-HBK-010 APPENDIXB INTACTSHIP INFORMATION B-1 INTRODUCTION To be effective, the salvage engineer needs a general knowledge of ship form and construction, supplemented by information specific to a particular casualty. The characteristics of ships can be grouped by broad classes, because similar service requirements lead to similar forms. This appendix describes the sources of vessel-specific data available to the salvage engineer, including a short description of the NAVSEA drawing numbering system. Summary tables of pertinent characteristics of Navy ships are also included. B-2 SHIP-SPECIFIC DATA A great deal of information is generated and recorded during a ship’s design, construction, and trials. Access to tabulated ship data can greatly simplify and speed the salvage engineer’s work. The documents described in this paragraph are particularly useful. Naval ships generally carry a greater body of ship’s data than commercial ships. Documents carried onboard are normally kept in the engineering log room or technical library on naval ships. Documents for naval ships are also available from the parent squadron and repair activities; each ship class is assigned to a planning shipyard that maintains complete drawing files for assigned ships. Paragraph B-4 describes the NAVSEA ship’s document numbering and classification system, gives planning yard assignments for Navy ships and craft, and describes likely sources for ship’s documents. Commercial vessels usually carry fewer documents than naval vessels, but the information contained in them is often quite detailed, especially in regard to hydrostatic characteristics and cargo capacity and stowage. Documents for commercial vessels are obtained from the ship’s officers, owners or shipping company, agents, port engineer, building shipyard, or ship designer. Drawings for U.S. flag vessels can also be obtained from Chief, Naval Architecture Branch, Marine Technical and Hazardous Materials Branch, Headquarters, USCG, Washington D.C, 20593. Most current drawings are accurate and reliable. Drawings and other documents describing ship’s characteristics are revised to reflect changes to ship and component characteristics and to correct errors. Documents for Navy ships are normally revised during overhaul or major maintenance availabilities to reflect changes made during the overhaul/availability and previous changes or discrepancies reported by the ship’s force or other organizations. Salvage personnel should verify that they are using the latest revision, as listed in the Ship’s Drawing Index (SDI), and should be aware that the issuance of revised drawings may lag completion of the alteration by many months. Ships that have been inactive for many years are often objects of salvage or wreck removal; drawings may not reflect alterations made after the ship entered inactive status. When drawings and other data for a specific ship are not available, documents for similar ships are used. In such cases, the data should be used only as an indication of probable conditions, to be verified as the work progresses. Even drawings for ships of the same class may not be entirely accurate, especially in the particulars of component structures and systems. Design modifications are often made before a shipbuilding program is completed; only the later ships will be built with the modifications. Subsequent alterations may not be accomplished on all ships of the class; modifications cannot be made simultaneously to all ships. Shipyards are allowed some latitude in determining final details—ships built at different yards will usually have differences. The following are some typical differences between ships of the same class built at different yards: • Tanks or compartment lengths, which may vary by a foot or more with attendant differences in tank capacities. • The exact routing of piping and wiring systems. • Arrangement and location of machinery room auxiliaries. • Relative position and arrangement of staterooms, passageways, and other minor compartments not bounded by major structural or watertight bulkheads. • Precise location of doors, hatches, fireplugs, and similar fittings. The relative importance of the differences between documented and actual characteristics depends on the nature of the salvage operation and data required. Discrepancies should be noted and compiled to give a subjective evaluation of the data’s reliability. For ships that will be returned to active service, discrepancies in published data should be included in the final salvage report and/or forwarded to the cognizant authority. B-1 info_mart S0300-A8-HBK-010 B-2.1 Curves of Form. Curves showing hydrostatic characteristics of a ship’s hull are prepared by the designers. These curves are normally presented in a single document called the Curves of Form, Displacement and Other (D & O) Curves, or Hydrostatics Curves. This set of curves is often the single most useful document to a salvage engineer. Curves of Form are carried aboard Navy ships, usually in the custody of the Engineer or Damage Control Assistant. Figure FO-2 is an exact copy of the Curves of Form prepared by the designers for the frigate FFG-7 and other ships of the same class. On newer ships, the Curves of Form are presented on a single drawing with the Cross Curves of Stability and the Bonjean’s Curves. The following information is available from the Curves of Form for Navy ships: • ∆ Displacement in Saltwater ( SW), • Vertical Position of the Center of Buoyancy (VCB or KB), • Longitudinal Position of the Center of Buoyancy (LCB), • Longitudinal Position of the Center of Flotation (LCF), • Tons per Inch Immersion (TPI), • Height of the Transverse Metacenter above the Keel (KM), and • Approximate Moment to Change Trim One Inch (MT1). The Curves of Form drawing for older ships usually include the following additional curves: • ∆ Displacement in Fresh Water ( FW), • Areas of Waterplanes (AWP), • Area of the Midship Section (AM), • Outline of the Midship Section, • Longitudinal Metacentric Radius (BML), • Area of Wetted Surface (S), and • Curve of Sectional Areas. All curves are entered from the ordinate scale with the value for mean draft. The value of the desired characteristic is read from the appropriate horizontal scale, or a factor is applied to the displacement value, as noted on the graph. All characteristics are plotted as a function of mean draft, assuming zero trim. A ship trims about its center of flotation without changing displacement. If the center of flotation is not coincident with the midlength, mean draft differs from draft at the center of flotation; the displacement corresponding to the draft at the center of flotation is the true displacement, while taking displacement based on the mean draft returns an erroneous value. Because of this disparity, entering the curves with a known displacement will give an accurate mean draft only for a ship with no trim. An additional curve is sometimes included to provide a correction to be applied to the value for displacement when the ship is trimmed. If there is no curve, displacement when trimmed is determined by entering the curve with the draft at the center of flotation. From Figure B-1, the difference between the mean draft and the draft at the center of flotation can be seen to be: dt TC = L where: TC = correction to mean draft for trim, in. d = distance from midships to the center of flotation, ft t = trim, in. L = length between draft marks, ft B-2 info_mart S0300-A8-HBK-010 The correction is added to or subtracted from the mean draft, as appropriate. EQUIVALENT UNTRIMMED TRIMMED Alternatively, the draft correction can be WATERLINE WATERLINE multiplied by TPI to calculate a displacement correction to be applied to the displacement returned by the mean draft. LCF For the situation shown in Figure B-1, LCF is abaft midships and there is trim by the bow, so the correction is negative. It is helpful to draw a similar sketch for each situation to determine whether the T correction is added or subtracted. f t TM For Navy ships, the above correction need TLCF d TC not be made if a draft diagram is available. Ta See Paragraph B-2.6.2 for instructions on the use of draft diagrams. If a ship has appreciable hog, the draft at midships is less than the mean draft. Since AFT FWD ships are fuller in the midbody than at the MARKS MARKS ends, the displacement is less than that L indicated by the mean draft. Similarly, if the ship is sagging, the draft amidships is greater than the mean draft and Figure B-1. Correction to Displacement for Trim. displacement is greater than that indicated by mean draft. When displacement is calculated by integration of sectional areas, Bonjean’s Curves can be entered with the actual forward, after, and amidships drafts. Sectional areas at intermediate stations are obtained from the curves by assuming the hull deflection follows a parabolic form, either by sketching a deflected waterline on a profile arrangement of the Bonjean’s Curves, or by interpolating drafts for the intermediate stations. When a displacement curve is used, a common practice is to enter the displacement curve with a corrected midships draft equal to the mean of the forward and after drafts, plus or minus a fraction of the deflection at midships. The deflection is added for sag or decreased for hog—i.e., the correction brings the calculated midships draft towards the observed midships draft. For a rectangular waterplane, the correction is two-thirds the deflection, since the area under a parabola is two-thirds that of a circumscribing rectangle. For most commercial hull forms, 0.75 times deflection is a reasonable approximation. B-2.2 Offsets. Offsets are tabulated as described in Paragraph 1-2.7. They are often included in a set of drawings with the lines plans (e.g., Molded Lines and Offsets for OLIVER HAZARD PERRY). Waterline halfbreadths and deck heights/halfbreadths are tabulated for 21 stations on the FFG-7 Lines Plan (FO-1).
Recommended publications
  • Super Chief – El Capitan See Page 4 for Details
    AUGUST- lyerlyer SEPTEMBER 2020 Ready for Boarding! Late 1960s Combined Super Chief – El Capitan see page 4 for details FLYER SALE ENDS 9-30-20 Find a Hobby Shop Near You! Visit walthers.com or call 1-800-487-2467 WELCOME CONTENTS Chill out with cool new products, great deals and WalthersProto Super Chief/El Capitan Pages 4-7 Rolling Along & everything you need for summer projects in this issue! Walthers Flyer First Products Pages 8-10 With two great trains in one, reserve your Late 1960s New from Walthers Pages 11-17 Going Strong! combined Super Chief/El Capitan today! Our next HO National Model Railroad Build-Off Pages 18 & 19 Railroads have a long-standing tradition of getting every last WalthersProto® name train features an authentic mix of mile out of their rolling stock and engines. While railfans of Santa Fe Hi-Level and conventional cars - including a New From Our Partners Pages 20 & 21 the 1960s were looking for the newest second-generation brand-new model, new F7s and more! Perfect for The Bargain Depot Pages 22 & 23 diesels and admiring ever-bigger, more specialized freight operation or collection, complete details start on page 4. Walthers 2021 Reference Book Page 24 cars, a lot of older equipment kept rolling right along. A feature of lumber traffic from the 1960s to early 2000s, HO Scale Pages 25-33, 36-51 Work-a-day locals and wayfreights were no less colorful, the next run of WalthersProto 56' Thrall All-Door Boxcars N Scale Pages 52-57 with a mix of earlier engines and equipment that had are loaded with detail! Check out these layout-ready HO recently been repainted and rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Transportation Means and Modes
    FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION MEANS AND MODES OBJECTIVES: ● Discovering the different means of freight transport: specific vocabulary ● Discussing their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages ● Discovering the usefulness to combine many way of transporting fright: multi-modality and inter-modality FINAL TASK: A multimodal shipment 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ● Slide n°1: TITLE AND OBJECTIVES ● Slides n°2 to n° 6: OVERVIEW ● Slide n°7 part n°1: TITLE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ● Slide n°8: DIFFERENT WAYS OF TRANSPORTING GOODS ● Slide n°9: ROADS: FROM SIMPLE TRUCKS TO AUSTRALIAN ROAD TRAINS ● Slide n°10: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES ● Slides n°11 and n°12: Act n° 1 ● Slides n°13 and n°14: Act n° 2 ● Slides n°15 and n°16: Act n° 3: intermediate task: CROSSWORD 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ● Slide n°17: RAIL TRANSPORTATION : TITLE PAGE ● Slide n°18: RAIL TRANSPORTATION: DEFINITION ● Slides n°19 and n°20: Act n° 4 ● Slide n°21: Act n° 5 Grammar point: comparisons ● Slides n°22 and n°23: Act n° 6: Advantages and Disadvantages ● Slide n°24: Act n°7: Intermediate task ● Slide n°25: MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SEAS AND RIVRS ● Slide n°26: DESCRIPTION ● Slides n°27 and n°28: MAIN TYPES OF MERCHANT SHIPS 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ● Slides n°29 and n°30: Act n° 8 ● Slide n°31: act n°9: Oral interaction ● Slide n°32: INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION ● Slide n°33: DIFFERENT TYPES OF BARGES ● Slides n°34 and n°35: Act n° 10 ● Slides n°36 and n°37: Act n° 11 ● Slide n°38: AIR AND SPACE TRANSPORTATION TITLE PAGE ● Slides n°39: AIR FREIGHTING ● Slides n°40 and n°41: ADVANTAGES 4 TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Ships and Boats for the HO Waterfront
    Ships and Boats for the HO Waterfront Mat Thompson ocrrnet.ipage.com Oregon Coast Railroad Waterways Portland is Pacific Ocean Port Portland water front served by railroads Small Fishing harbor outside Hoyt Street Railroad follows Columbia River 100 miles Astoria is Pacific Ocean port Tillamook is fishing port What I think I Know… Ships and boats are purpose designed and purposes are local… …but if it floats, somebody always has a scheme… Sails gone by World War I…mostly Wooden boats until mid 50s, then steel 10% out of scale probably works 1/96 ship – OK 1/72 – probably too big Manufacturers careless about scale Old boats - wreaks or abandoned What I think I Know… Waterline models are best for layouts Wash resin in soap and water Resin requires filing and trimming Solid wire for lines (Tichy .010, .015, .020) European work boats = colors, U.S. = white Oregon Coast Railroad Wharf • Wharf – Sheet & strip styrene painted concrete • Notice cleats and bitts and wooden snubbers RATING THE MODEL INSTRUCTIONSOregon NA Coast Railroad Wharf MATERIALS GOOD DIFFICULTY EASY APPEAL GOOD • Wharf – Sheet & strip styrene painted concrete - wood snubbers • Notice cleats and bitts - Seaport Models OCR Seawall • Mr Plaster Seawall • FOS Models construction barge Campbell Piers Campbell • Currently available – $90 • All wood construction, great template • Wharf has tracks • Decking is panels - stripwood looks better • Other craft kits makers have released wood piers Walthers Pier Walthers • Currently available – crane pier $75, pier $22
    [Show full text]
  • GREENVILLE YARD, TRANSFER BRIDGE SYSTEM HAER No. NJ-49-A Jersey City Hudson County New Jersey ' "R ' PHOTOGRAPHS WRIT
    GREENVILLE YARD, TRANSFER BRIDGE SYSTEM HAER No. NJ-49-A Jersey City • Hudson County \ I/\L '. - New Jersey ' "r~ ' PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORDS National Park Service Northeast Region Philadelphia Support Office U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, P.A. 19106 C HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD GREENVILLE YARD, TRANSFER BRIDGE SYSTEM HAERNo.NJ-49-A LOCATION: Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey USGS Jersey City, NJ Quadrangle, UTM Coordinates: 18.578260.4503280 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: 1904, 1910,1925, 1931,1943, 1945 ENGINEER/BUILDER: J.A. Bensel, F.L. DuBosque, W.C. Bowles, and W.H. Brown, engineers, Pennsylvania Railroad (PRR); American Bridge Company, Trenton, New Jersey, and Steele & Condict Co., Jersey City, New Jersey, principal contractors PRESENT OWNER: Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conxail), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the New York Cross Harbor Railroad, Brooklyn, New York PRESENT USE: Railroad car float transfer bridge SIGNIFICANCE: The Greenville Yard Transfer Bridge System is the last surviving example in New York Harbor of a suspended-type car float transfer bridge. The innovative design of the transfer bridge was introduced by PRR engineers in 1888, and proved superior to other types in ease and speed of operation. The design was perfected and electrified with the building of the Greenville facility in 1905, and became the standard adopted by many other railroads. PROJECT INFORMATION: The Greenville Yard Transfer Bridge System was recorded in December 1996 by the Cultural Resource Group of Louis Berger & Associates, Inc., East Orange, New Jersey, for Conrail. The recordation was undertaken pursuant to Condition 1 of Permit No.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)
    NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Car Ferry) Page 1 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 MARITIME HERITAGE OF THE UNITED STATES NHL THEME STUDY—LARGE VESSELS City of Milwaukee (Car Ferry) Page 1 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: City of Milwaukee (Car Ferry) Other Name/Site Number: S.S. City of Milwaukee 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Marine Terminal Railyard, Not for publication: East Slip City/Town: Elberta Vicinity: State: MI County: Benzie Code: 019 Zip Code: 49628 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s):__ Public-local: District: Public-State: Site: Public-Federal:__ Structure; X Obj ect:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing ____ ____ buildings ____ ____ sites 1 ____ structures ____ ____ objects 1 ____ Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing:_____________________ NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 City of Milwaukee (Car Perry) Page 2 USDI\NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    to approximately 1838 in the mid-Atlantic States Introduction prior to the American Civil War.” History of the Transfer Bridges: What Are They? Cross Harbor Freight Program (taken from the PA Greenville Yard Cross Harbor Freight Program-Basis Transfer Bridges are used to transfer automobiles, rail of Design Report December 20, 2012) cars or pedestrians from land based to water based transportation systems or vice versa. For example a Greenville Yard is the western terminus of the current ferry ramp that acts as a bridge between land and the rail car float (barge) system, which operates between ferry is an example of a transfer bridge. Transfer Jersey City and 65th Street Facility on the Brooklyn bridges can also be used to transfer rail cars onto and waterfront. The barge rail car float system that moves off of car floats. A car float is a barge that has rails goods across the New York Harbor has been in mounted on the deck so that rail cars can be pushed existence since before the growth of the national onto the barge for transport across a river or harbor. highway system and before the construction of vehicular bridges spanning the Hudson River. The Car floats rise and fall with the tide. Also the Cross Harbor rail freight operation at Greenville Yard freeboard on the car float changes as the loading on once encompassed six rail transfer bridges; as many the car float changes. The freeboard is the distance as thirty-nine rail car floats barges, and upland rail from the waterline to the top of deck.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rail and Transit Gallery
    THIS MONTH IN RAIL AND TRANSIT 3 RAILROADED INTO A CAREER David Kwechansky's experience as the first passenger on the CN Rapido in 1965 launched his research career. 6 ART GALLERY A Roil ond Transit Gallery: NUMBER 534 - JUNE 1994 Photos of Kenora, Ontario. 8 PUBLISHED BY CAR-FLOAT OPERATION ENDS Upper Canada Railway Society ON THE DETROIT RIVER RO. Box 122, Station A The history, operations, and demise of the Toronto, Ontario M5W IA2 Norfolk Southern service between Windsor EDITOR'S NOTES and Detroit, by Gordon Webster. I'll start by admitting two mistakes last 10 month. On the front cover of the May issue, EDITOR RESEARCH AND REVIEWS the number 9015 can be clearly seen on John Pat Scrimgeour RAILWAY ARCHAEOLOGY . Carter's photo in the Thompson Canyon, but 250 Queens Quay West #1607 . More in the Eastern Townships not clearly enough that 1 could get the num• Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N2 . Prescott show ber right in the photo caption inside. 1 missed E-Mail: 731 [email protected] BOOKS Kaslo and Slocan on another of John's photos at the top of the CONTRIBUTING EDITORS 13 Transcontinental section by inadvertently John Carter, Art Clowes, TRANSCONTINENTAL deleting his name from the description on Scott Haskill, Don McQueen, THE RAPIDO Newco and CAR updates Page 10. Sorry, John. Sean Robitaille, Cray Scrimgeour, . Amtrak overnight train to Toronto Now that winter is over - 1 know it is, Chris Spinney, Gordon Webster THE PANORAMA Decision on E&N the last hockey game just ended - railfan . Vancouver commuter train season is beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Tips Layout Design for Operation by Andy Sperandeo
    IDEAS FOR PROTOTYPICAL LAYOUT OPERATION A SUPPLEMENT TO MODEL RAILROADER MAGAZINE Workshop tips Layout design for operation by Andy Sperandeo Track 1 EAST PORT MARQUETTE YARD, North Western Transfer just arrived Track 6 WEST Chicago & North Western Rockford and west Milwaukee Road Williams Bay/Winter Hill/Lake Beulah Soo Line Hales Corners/Big Bend/Mukwonago Milwaukee deliveries Kansas City and west via Santa Fe Williams Bay block to go on RFX for setout by Williams Bay Switcher, WBS Rockford Extra, symbol “RFX” After classification of NW Transfer Mukwonago Turn, MUT Soo Line Santa Fe Run- Milwaukee Road Through West, SFW Milwaukee deliveries • How a busy model railroad freight yard works • Learn how to reproduce realistic engine terminal and caboose activities • Types of staging yards and tips on how to use them effectively • Prototype passenger train servicing activities that you can model 618262 2015 Layout Planning Ideas 1 © 2015 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher. www.ModelRailroader.com SUBSCRIBERALL-NEW! EXCLUSIVE THE OPERATORS Layout design for operation What makes one track plan better for an operating layout than another? Here are some things I look for in pub- lished track plans, plans I design myself, and plans my friends show me. Then on the following pages I’ll describe opera- tional features both prototype and model that can be planned into our layouts. Staging. It’s a given that any model railroad can represent only part of a major railroad, let alone the continental railroad network. So any operating lay- out needs offstage tracks to represent the distant places our trains come from and go to when they aren’t passing across our too-short main lines.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Marine Highway Report
    EAST COAST MARINE HIGHWAY INITIATIVE M-95 STUDY FINAL REPORT October 2013 PREPARED FOR: East Coast Marine Highway Initiative Awarding Authority New Bedford Harbor Development Commission Maryland Port Administration New Jersey Department of Transportation Canaveral Port Authority I-95 Corridor Coalition DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATIONS This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the East Coast Marine Highway Initiative Awarding Authority, a cooperative formed between the ports of New Bedford, Baltimore and Canaveral, the New Jersey Department of Transportation, and the I-95 Corridor Coalition. The cooperative agreement was funded by the U.S. Maritime Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are those of the researchers and staff, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any government agencies or organizations that funded the study. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Certain forward-looking statements are based upon interpretations or assessments of best available information at the time of writing. Actual events may differ from those assumed, and events are subject to change. Findings are time-sensitive and relevant only to current conditions at the time of writing. Factors influencing the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements may exist that are outside of the purview of the consulting firm. Parsons Brinckerhoff’s report is thus to be viewed as an assessment that is time-relevant, specifically referring to conditions at the time of review. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party's use or the results of such use of any information contained in this document in whole or in part.
    [Show full text]
  • State Rail Plan FINAL
    Delaware State Rail Plan FINAL Acknowledgements DelDOT would like to recognize the following individuals for their contributions as a Stakeholder in this Plan’s development: Name Company Jeffrey Gerlach AMTRAK David Blankenship City of Wilmington Sharon Daboin CSX Jeffrey Stone Delaware Office of Economic Development Roberta Geier Delaware Department of Transportation Gregory Oliver Delaware Department of Transportation Dwayne Day Delaware Department of Transportation David Campbell Delaware Transit Corporation Kennard Potts Delaware Transit Corporation Albert Loyola Delaware Transit Corporation Cathy Smith Delaware Transit Corporation James Galvin Dover Kent MPO Daniel Wolfensberger Kent Economic Partnership, Inc. Jeannie Fazio Maryland Department of Transportation Debbie Bowden Maryland Department of Transportation Nicole Katsikides Maryland Department of Transportation Karl Kalbacher New Castle County Rick Crawford Norfolk Southern Herb Inden Office of State Planning Coordination David Edgell Office of State Planning Coordination Bryan Hall Office of State Planning Coordination Julie Wheatley Sussex County Economic Development Office Byron Comati SEPTA Harry Garforth SEPTA Hal Godwin Sussex County Dave Gula WILMAPCO Daniel Blevins WILMAPCO Foster Nichols Parsons Brinckerhoff John Baesch Parsons Brinckerhoff Joseph Gurskis Parsons Brinckerhoff Anna Lynn Smith Parsons Brinckerhoff Stephanie Jackson Parsons Brinckerhoff Len Usvyat Parsons Brinckerhoff Stephen Bassford S.L. Bassford and Associates Delaware State Rail Plan FINAL Table of
    [Show full text]