DOCSLIB.ORG

UN-Habitat Global Activities Report 2015 INCREASING SYNERGY for GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UN-Habitat Global Activities Report 2015 INCREASING SYNERGY for GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP UN-HABITAT GLOBAL ACTIVITIES REPORT 2015 INCREASING SYNERGY FOR GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP The UN-Habitat Global Activities Report is an historical progress report to the Governing Council that takes into account developments in addressing UN-HABITATUN-HABITAT GLOBAL GLOBAL the project portfolio of the United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat) at the national, regional and global levels. ACTIVITIESACTIVITIES REPORT REPORT 2015 2015 Over the years, the report – formerly known as the operational activity report – has been transmitted to the Governing Council on a biennial basis as an information document that provides project portfolio trend analysis based on INCREASINGINCREASING SYNERGY SYNERGY FOR FOR project acquisition and expenditures. GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP The Programme’s work has been focused on promoting national urban policy GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP reforms together with building institutional and human capacities, including providing support to Governments in the implementation of national urban plans. UN-Habitat activities and programmes at the global, regional and national levels are crucial in increasing synergies for greater national ownership of the various sustainable urban development tools and best practices being promoted by the United Nations and Habitat Agenda partners around the world. The report is available from www.unhabitat.org/gc25documents. HS/028/15E ISBN(Series): 978-92-1-133406-7 ISBN(Volume): 978-92-1-132652-9 UNITED NATIONS HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROGRAMME P.O.Box 30030,Nairobi 00100,Kenya; Tel: +254-20-76263120; Fax: +254-20-76234266/7 (central office); [email protected] www.unhabitat.org UN-HABITAT GLOBAL ACTIVITIES REPORT 2015 INCREASING SYNERGY FOR GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP UN-HABITAT GLOBAL ACTIVITIES REPORT 2015 INCREASING SYNERGY FOR GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP Copyright © United Nations Human Settlements Programme 2015 All rights reserved United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) P. O. Box 30030, 00100 Nairobi GPO KENYA Tel: 254-020-7623120 (Central Office) www.unhabitat.org HS/028/15E ISBN(Series): 978-92-1-133406-7 ISBN(Volume): 978-92-1-132652-9 Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme, the United Nations, or its Member States. Excerpts may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. Acknowledgement Director: Alioune Badiane Principal Authors: Abdallah Kassim, Amrita Jaidka, Alain Kanyinda, Ben Arimah, Jianguo Shen, Raymond Otieno Otieno Contributors: Ananda Weliwita, Andre Dzikus, Axumite Gebre-Egziabher, Channe Oguzhan, David Evans, Dyfed Aubrey, Elkin Velasquez, Gulelat Kebede, Jean duPlessis, Joe Hooper, Katja Schaefer, Leila Valente Sirica, Mutinta Munyati, Paula Pennanen, Paulius Kulikauskas, Pireh Otieno, Raf Tuts, Remy Sietchiping, Yoshinobu Fukasawa Design and Layout: Andrew Ondoo Printing: UNON Publishing Services Section, Nairobi-ISO 14001-certified/cm UN-HABITAT GLOBAL ACTIVITIES REPORT 2015 II INCREASING SYNERGY FOR GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACP African, Caribbean and Pacific HVWSHE Human Values Based in Water, SIDA Swedish International Development ADB African Development Bank Sanitation and Hygiene Education Cooperation Agency ADB Asia Development Bank IASC Inter Agency Standing Committee STDM Social Tenure Domain Model AFD Agence Française de IBRD/WB International Bank for SUDP Sustainable Urban Development Développement Reconstruction and Programme Development/World Bank AFD French Development Agency SUSTRAN Promoting Sustainable Transport IDPs Internally displaced persons Solutions for East African Cities AMCHUD African Ministerial Conference on Housing and Urban Development INU National Planning Institute UCLG United Cities and local Governments ASUD Achieving Sustainable Urban IOM International Organization for ULN Urban Legal Network Development Migration* UN United Nations AusAID Australian Agency for International ISUDP Integrated Strategic Urban UNCT United Nations Country Team Development Plan Development UNDP United Nations Development BMBF German Federal Ministry for ITDP Institute of Transport Development Programme* and Policy Education and Research UNEP United Nations Environment CPI City Prosperity Index JICA Japan International Cooperation Programme* Agency DfID Department for International UNESCAP United Nations Economic and Development KMP Kenya Municipal Programme Social Commission for Asia and EAC East African Community MDGs Millennium Development Goals the Pacific EC European Commission MTSIP Medium Term Strategic and UNESCO United Nations Educational, Institutional Plan Scientific and Cultural ENEL Foundation NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations Organization* EU European Union NSDFU National Slum Dwellers Federation UNFPA United Nations Population Fund* EU-UDG European Union Urban UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund* Development Group OCHA Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs UNMEER United Nations Mission for Ebola FAO Food and Agriculture Organization Emergency Response of the United Nations OECS Organization of Eastern Caribbean States UNOHCHR Office of the United Nations FF The Ford Foundation PAG Project Advisory Group High Commissioner for FMDV Global Fund for Cities Development Human Rights PI Plan International GDP Gross Domestic Product UNOPS United Nations Office for PILaR Participatory and Inclusive Land GEC Gender Evaluation Criteria Project Services* Readjustment GEF Global Environment Facility UPPR Urban Partnerships for RAMA Network of Metropolitan Areas GEMI Global Expanded Monitoring Poverty Reduction of the Americas Initiative USAID United Sates Agency for RP Rapid Planning GiZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für International Development RUSPS Rapid Urban Sector Profiling for Internationale Zusammenarbeit WASH Water and Sanitation Sustainability GFCD Global Fund for Cities Development WB World Bank SDC Swiss Agency for Development GLTN Global Land Tool Network and Cooperation WHO World Health Organization* GWOPA Global Water Operators Partnership SIDA Swedish International Development WUF World Urban Forum Alliance Cooperation Agency HUWSUP Hargeisa Urban Water Supply *United Nations Organizations and the trust funds Upgrading Project FOREWORD Over the past two years, UN-Habitat has engaged in developing global norms and supporting innovative models to assist national governments and local authorities increasing their knowledge on sustainable urbanization as well as improving national and local policies on housing and urban development. This is meant to enhance regional, national and local capacities for the effective implementation of pro-poor human settlements policies much needed for poverty elevation in line with the Habitat Agenda and the Millennium Development Goals. More concretely, the main focus of UN-Habitat’s work at the global, regional, national and local levels has been on promoting policy reforms as well as building institutional and human capacities and supporting Joan Clos the implementation of local and Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director United Nations Human Settlements Programme national plans of action for sustainable (UN-Habitat) urbanization. In view of the current rapid urbanization in much of the developing world, the development of efficient legislation and policies, the promotion of adequate infrastructure and basic services as well as effective UN-HABITAT GLOBAL ACTIVITIES REPORT 2015 IV INCREASING SYNERGY FOR GREATER NATIONAL OWNERSHIP UN-Habitat’s strategy to expand its earmarked projects portfolio, has been sustained, from a level of USD 136 million in 2012, to USD 171 million in 2013 – representing a 25 per cent increase, and to USD 172 million by November 2014. urban planning and design are of strategy to expand its earmarked projects initiatives, including joint programming, utmost importance for the creation of portfolio, has been sustained, from a and urges the United Nations socially inclusive, resilient, economically level of USD 136 million in 2012, to USD development system to fully utilize such prosperous and energy-efficient 171 million in 2013 – representing a 25 opportunities in the interest of enhancing cities that maximize the benefits of per cent increase, and to USD 172 million aid efficiency and effectiveness. agglomeration, minimize the demand by November 2014. These contributions for urban mobility and transport, and have enabled UN-Habitat to provide This report is structured around six major provide conditions necessary for urban strong support of more than USD 162 chapters, following an introduction economic growth and job creation. million in 2014 alone to 16 countries in providing a global overview of sub-Saharan Africa, 18 countries in Asia urbanisation and its transformative As sustainable urban development and the Pacific, 9 countries in the Arab powers. The first five chapters, covering remains one of the most pressing global States region, and 19 countries in Latin Africa, the Arab States, Asia and the challenges of the twenty-first century, America and the Caribbean, in addition Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean, national
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How 'Great' Was Alexander?
    Historical Site of Mirhadi Hoseini http://m-hosseini.ir ……………………………………………………………………………………… IRANIAN HISTORY: POST-ACHAEMENIDS How ‘Great’ Was Alexander? By: Professor Ian Worthington1[1] (University of Missouri-Columbia) Why was Alexander II of Macedon called 'Great'? The answer seems relatively straightforward: from an early age he was an achiever, he conquered territories on a superhuman scale, he established an empire until his times unrivalled, and he died young, at the height of his power. Thus, at the youthful age of 20, in 336, he inherited the powerful empire of Macedon, which by then controlled Greece and had already started to make inroads into Asia. In 334 he invaded Persia, and within a decade he had defeated the Persians, subdued Egypt, and pushed on to Iran, Afghanistan and even India. As well as his vast conquests Alexander is credited with the spread of Greek culture and education in his empire, not to mention being responsible for the physical and cultural formation of the Hellenistic kingdoms — some would argue that the Hellenistic world was Alexander's legacy.[2[2]] He has also been viewed as a philosophical idealist, striving to create a unity of mankind by his so-called fusion of the races policy, in which he attempted to integrate Persians and Orientals into his administration and army. Thus, within a dozen years Alexander’s empire stretched from Greece in the west to India in the far east, and he was even worshipped as a god by many of his subjects while still alive. On the basis of his military conquests contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman
    Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman In his speech On the Crown Demosthenes often lionizes himself by suggesting that his actions and policy required him to overcome insurmountable obstacles. Thus he contrasts Athens’ weakness around 346 B.C.E. with Macedonia’s strength, and Philip’s II unlimited power with the more constrained and cumbersome decision-making process at home, before asserting that in spite of these difficulties he succeeded in forging later a large Greek coalition to confront Philip in the battle of Chaeronea (Dem.18.234–37). [F]irst, he (Philip) ruled in his own person as full sovereign over subservient people, which is the most important factor of all in waging war . he was flush with money, and he did whatever he wished. He did not announce his intentions in official decrees, did not deliberate in public, was not hauled into the courts by sycophants, was not prosecuted for moving illegal proposals, was not accountable to anyone. In short, he was ruler, commander, in control of everything.1 For his depiction of Philip’s authority Demosthenes looks less to Macedonia than to Athens, because what makes the king powerful in his speech is his freedom from democratic checks. Nevertheless, his observations on the Macedonian royal power is more informative and helpful than Aristotle’s references to it in his Politics, though modern historians tend to privilege the philosopher for what he says or even does not say on the subject. Aristotle’s seldom mentions Macedonian kings, and when he does it is for limited, exemplary purposes, lumping them with other kings who came to power through benefaction and public service, or who were assassinated by men they had insulted.2 Moreover, according to Aristotle, the extreme of tyranny is distinguished from ideal kingship (pambasilea) by the fact that tyranny is a government that is not called to account.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region
    KURDISTAN RISING? CONSIDERATIONS FOR KURDS, THEIR NEIGHBORS, AND THE REGION Michael Rubin AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region Michael Rubin June 2016 American Enterprise Institute © 2016 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any man- ner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th St. NW Washington, DC 20036 www.aei.org. Cover image: Grand Millennium Sualimani Hotel in Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, by Diyar Muhammed, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons. Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Who Are the Kurds? 5 2. Is This Kurdistan’s Moment? 19 3. What Do the Kurds Want? 27 4. What Form of Government Will Kurdistan Embrace? 56 5. Would Kurdistan Have a Viable Economy? 64 6. Would Kurdistan Be a State of Law? 91 7. What Services Would Kurdistan Provide Its Citizens? 101 8. Could Kurdistan Defend Itself Militarily and Diplomatically? 107 9. Does the United States Have a Coherent Kurdistan Policy? 119 Notes 125 Acknowledgments 137 About the Author 139 iii Executive Summary wo decades ago, most US officials would have been hard-pressed Tto place Kurdistan on a map, let alone consider Kurds as allies. Today, Kurds have largely won over Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX a to GAS (A)
    GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 ANNEX A to GAS (A) STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) FOR GLOBAL INTO-PLANE REFUELING (IPR) IN SUPPORT OF WORLDWIDE MILITARY OPERATIONS Page 1 of 36 NATO UNCLASSIFIED GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 This document contains NSPA proprietary information. Reproduction or disclosure of any part without prior approval by NSPA is not permitted. AMENDMENT RECORD REVISION/AMENDMENT PAGES DATE OF ISSUE REMARKS 1.0 Version 1 35 Draft for NSPA Review Page 2 of 36 NATO UNCLASSIFIED GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 APPROVAL RECORD OFFICE / POSITION DATE NAME SIGNATURE Customer Representative 04JUL19 Various per e-mail NSPA Technical Officer Bernd JANSEN NSPA Project Lead Nicolas LEBRUN NSPA LK-F Branch Chief Mark KEKUEWA NSPA Contracting Officer Torsten ZAENGER Page 3 of 36 NATO UNCLASSIFIED GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Scope ......................................................................................................... 6 2. Applicable Documents ................................................................................ 7 3. Command and Control ............................................................................... 9 4. Planning Factors / Constraints ................................................................... 9 5. Description of the Services Required ....................................................... 10 6. Schedules, Milestones and Operating Hours ........................................... 14 7. Contractor Human
    [Show full text]
  • Global Observance of the Annual World Cities Day 2020
    EXPRESSION OF INTEREST 30 August 2019 Global Observance of the Annual World Cities Day 2020 Introduction The United Nations has designated every 31st of October as World Cities Day (WCD). UN-Habitat is the coordinating agency in the United Nations system to organize the annual Global Observation of World Cities Day, together with the host city. UN-Habitat is inviting cities to express their interest in hosting the global observation of the 2020 World Cities Day. World Cities Day was established on 27 December 2013 by the General Assembly in its resolution A/RES/68/239, in which the General Assembly “decides to designate 31 October, beginning in 2014, as World Cities Day, invites States, the United Nations system, in particular UN-Habitat, relevant international organizations, civil society and all relevant stakeholders to observe and raise awareness of the Day and stresses that the costs of all activities that may arise from observing the Day should be met from voluntary contributions”. The WCD has been strongly supported by the People’s Republic of China through the Ministry of Housing and Urban- Rural Development and the Shanghai Municipality. Background WCD is expected to promote the international community’s interest in global urbanization, push forward cooperation among countries in meeting opportunities and addressing challenges of urbanization, and contributing to sustainable urban development around the world. The general theme of World Cities Day is Better City, Better Life, while each year a different sub-theme and a location for its global observance is selected, to either promote successes of urbanization, or address specific challenges resulting from urbanization.
    [Show full text]
  • China-National-Report.Pdf
    China National Report Prepared for the Third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development People's Republic of China February 2015 Habitat III China National Report Introduction Among the declarations pervading the 21st century is that we have come to the “urban age” because, for the first time in human history, more than half of the world’s population lives within cities. At the critical juncture of jointly addressing challenges and building a better future, the Third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III), to be held in October, 2016 at Quito, Ecuador, is aiming at a new historic blueprint – the New Urban Agenda. This conference, as another important global event following the Second United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II), will become a new start for future-proof housing and sustainable urban development in all countries. In order to promote and support Habitat III as well as enhance more significantly the quality of human settlements in China, the Chinese government has organized relevant departments to prepare the Habitat III National Report. This report summarizes the efforts and successes of human settlements in China over the past 20 years, analyzes the challenges and problems ahead, and specifies the objectives, strategies and actions for the next stage. This report is jointly prepared by relevant government departments, NGOs, academic and research organizations in accordance with the requirements of UN-HABITAT Governing Council Resolution 24/14. It is hoped that this report can contribute to the success of Habitat III.
    [Show full text]
  • People-Centered Urbanization Program Oct22
    Permanent Mission of Italy Permanent Mission of the People’s to the United Nations Republic of China to the United Nations WORLD CITIES DAY 2014 LEADING URBAN TRANSFORMATIONS ECOSOC Chamber – 31 October 2014 (9:30am - 12:30pm) People-centred Urbanisation, Managing Social Inclusion in Today’s Cities Background For the first time in history, in 2008, more than half of the world’s population was recorded to be living in towns and cities. This number is constantly on the rise and is expected to reach almost five billion by 2030 (6.3 billion by 2050). Cities have increasingly become a concentration of peoples with diverse backgrounds, different cultural and ethnic origins and beliefs. The challenges that this new identity and diversity pose for countries and, more broadly, regions are today heightened when concentrated in extremely reduced geographical spaces. Cities of all sizes often struggle to find resources and apply good practices to respond to the magnitude of this change. In fact, cities are faced with the end results of transnational and internal migration1 that further exacerbates challenges already faced by cities in providing equitable access to urban services and infrastructure, including housing, services and employment, and in ensuring adequate planning for the accelerated urban growth. Yet, Local Authorities have little if any say over international and national migration policies and they have little capacity to control migratory flows into their cities. 1 The People’s Republic of China is the biggest country in the world in terms of internal migration, which amounted to 166 million in 2013. See China Science Center of International Eurasian Academy of Sciences/ China Association of Mayors/ Urban Planning Society of China/ UN-Habitat (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • BABYLONIA Page 1 of 84
    BABYLONIA Page 1 of 84 BABYLONIA Mohammed and Mosaib on the Euphrates, the full expansion of the body occurring between Chapter 1. Extent of the Babylonian Empire ... 1 Serut and El Khithr, and the pointed base Chapter 2. Climate and Productions ............. 19 reaching down to Kornah at the junction of Chapter 3. The People ................................. 25 the two streams. This tract, the main region of Chapter 4. The Capital ................................. 30 the ancient Babylonia, is about 320 miles Chapter 5. Arts and Sciences ........................ 41 long, and from 20 to 100 broad. It may be estimated to contain about 18,000 square Chapter 6. Manners and Customs ................ 55 miles. The tract west of the Euphrates is Chapter 7. Religion ...................................... 63 smaller than this. Its length, in the time of the Chapter 8. History and Chronology .............. 66 Babylonian Empire, may be regarded as about 350 miles, its average width is from 25 to 30 miles, which would give an area of about Chapter 1. Extent of the Babylonian 9000 square miles. Thus the Babylonia of Empire Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar may be Daniel 4:10,11. Behold, a tree in the midst regarded as covering a space of 27,000 of the earth, and the height thereof was square miles--a space a little exceeding the great; the tree grew and was strong: and the area of the Low countries. height thereof reached unto heaven, and the The small province included within these sight thereof to the end of all the earth. limits--smaller than Scotland or Ireland, or The limits of Babylonia Proper, the tract in Portugal or Bavaria--became suddenly, in the which the dominant power of the Fourth latter half of the seventh century B.C., the Monarchy had its abode, being almost mistress of an extensive empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion Cavalry and the Macedonian Heavy Infantry
    THE ARMY OP ALEXANDER THE GREAT %/ ROBERT LOCK IT'-'-i""*'?.} Submitted to satisfy the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in the School of History in the University of Leeds. Supervisor: Professor E. Badian Date of Submission: Thursday 14 March 1974 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH X 5 Boston Spa, Wetherby </l *xj 1 West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ. * $ www.bl.uk BEST COPY AVAILABLE. TEXT IN ORIGINAL IS CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE PAGE ABSTRACT The army with which Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire was "built around the Macedonian Companion cavalry and the Macedonian heavy infantry. The Macedonian nobility were traditionally fine horsemen, hut the infantry was poorly armed and badly organised until the reign of Alexander II in 369/8 B.C. This king formed a small royal standing army; it consisted of a cavalry force of Macedonian nobles, which he named the 'hetairoi' (or Companion]! cavalry, and an infantry body drawn from the commoners and trained to fight in phalangite formation: these he called the »pezetairoi» (or foot-companions). Philip II (359-336 B.C.) expanded the kingdom and greatly increased the manpower resources for war. Towards the end of his reign he started preparations for the invasion of the Persian empire and levied many more Macedonians than had hitherto been involved in the king's wars. In order to attach these men more closely to himself he extended the meaning of the terms »hetairol» and 'pezetairoi to refer to the whole bodies of Macedonian cavalry and heavy infantry which served under him on his campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • Poleis, Choras and Spaces, from Civic to Royal. Spaces in the Cities Over
    PYRENAE, vol. 47 núm. 2 (2016) ISSN: 0079-8215 EISSN: 2339-9171 (p. 27-38) © Borja Antela-Bernárdez, 2016 – CC BY-NC-ND REVISTA DE PREHISTÒRIA I ANTIGUITAT DE LA MEDITERRÀNIA OCCIDENTAL JOURNAL OF WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN PREHISTORY AND ANTIQUITY DOI: 10.1344/Pyrenae2016.vol47num2.2 Poleis, Choras and spaces, from Civic to Royal. Spaces in the cities over Macedonian rule from Alexander the Great to Seleucus I Poleis, Choras y espacios, de cívicos a reales. Territorios en las ciudades bajo dominio macedonio de Alejandro Magno a Seleuco I BORJA ANTELA-BERNÁRDEZ Departament de Ciències de l’Antiguitat i l’Edat Mitjana. Facultat de Lletres. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Edifici B. Carrer de la Fortuna, E-08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) [email protected] The conquest of Asia by Alexander the Great led the Macedonian tradition to a new challenge in order to control and manage the landscape and its resources in the new territories. As far as these territories were spear-won lands, the usual perspective of the Argead Kingdom, itself a result of conquests, still had validity. Nevertheless, this Macedonian tradition must also conceal the Greek cities founded within the new Hellenistic Kingdoms, and also the native population. In order to understand the construction of relationships between royal and city spaces during Alexander’s rule and in the very early configuration of the Hellenistic Monarchies, the break between the Classical Poleis and the Hellenistic ones must be described, paying attention to the difference between the classical chora as city space and the new Hellenistic reality of the shared politiké and basiliké chora.
    [Show full text]
  • 30000-Voices-Habitatiii.Pdf
    A CONFERENCE OF 30,000 VOICES HABITAT III - 2016 © 2017 United Nations All rights reserved worldwide The Habitat III Engagement Area was coordinated by the Habitat III Secretariat team. The work was led by the team comprised of Ana B. Moreno, Tobias Kettner, Rosa Suriñach, Sarah (Laney) Stone, Jenina Alli, Xavier Mestres, Alessandra Pirera, Andrea Posada, Francisco Fuenmayor, Julian Valencia and Jessica Bridger. Gratitude should also be expressed to the rest of the Habitat III Secretariat, the interns and volunteers who supported this process. Special mention to Kinza Bajwa, Emerant Barclay, Sophie Chanson, Elena Christy, Magdalena Chudy, Vanesa de la Dueña, Benjamin Dooley, Priscillia Jorge. Tamara Kovazh, Jaina Kulmanbetova, Michele Leray, Haosi Li, Christine Luttmer, Pia Mercado, Wenjun Ouyang, Alice Pontiggia, Nadine Rachid, Shubhank Sahay, Maria Salazar, Carolina Solis, Catrin Wallace, Kristiina Yang, and Maggie Ye. Recognition should also be given to Oscar Alejandro Calderon, Juanita Carrillo, Simone D’Antonio, Lys Mehou-loko, Alejandro Paredes, Alejandro Reinoso, Daniel Rodríguez, Santiago Serrano, Joel Sheakoski, and Franklin Williams, who supported the Conference in Quito. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or regarding its economic system or degree of development. References to names, firms, commercial products, and processes does not imply their endorsement by the United Nations, and a failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product, or process is not a sign of disapproval.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyrus the Great, Exiles and Foreign Gods a Comparison of Assyrian and Persian Policies on Subject Nations1
    Cyrus the Great, Exiles and Foreign Gods A Comparison of Assyrian and Persian Policies on Subject Nations1 To be published in: Wouter Henkelman, Charles Jones, Michael Kozuh and Christopher Woods (eds.), Extraction and Control: Studies in Honor of Matthew W. Stolper. Oriental Institute Publications. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. R.J. van der Spek VU University Amsterdam Introduction Cyrus, king of Persia (559-530 BC), conqueror of Babylon (539), has a good reputation, also among modern historians. Most textbooks, monographs, and articles on ancient history stress his tolerance towards the countries and nations he subdued. It is mentioned time and again that he allowed them freedom of religion, that he behaved respectfully towards Babylon and its temple cults, and that he reinstated several cults, especially that of the god of Israel in Jerusalem. This policy is often contrasted with that of the Assyrian kings, who are presented as cruel rulers, oppressing subdued nations, destroying sanctuaries, deporting gods and people, and forcing their subjects to worship Assyrian gods. Cyrus’ acts supposedly inaugurated a new policy, aimed at winning the subject nations for the Persian Empire by tolerance and clemency. It was exceptional that Cambyses and Xerxes abandoned this policy in Egypt and Babylonia. In the prestigious Cambridge Ancient History volume on Persia, T. Cuyler Young maintains that Cyrus’ policy “was one of remarkable tolerance based on a respect for individual people, ethnic groups, other religions and ancient kingdoms.” 2 1 This contribution is an update of my article “Cyrus de Pers in Assyrisch perspectief: Een vergelijking tussen de Assyrische en Perzische politiek ten opzichte van onderworpen volken,” Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 96 (1983): 1-27 (in Dutch, for a general audience of historians).
    [Show full text]