DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Version of 2012 Section 3 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Version of 2012 Section 3 Report A REPORT ON FEDERAL HISTORIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT THE PRESERVE AMERICA EXECUTIVE ORDER REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT February 15, 2012 Preserving America’s Heritage An independent federal agency, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) promotes the preservation, enhancement, and sustainable use of our nation’s diverse historic resources and advises the President and Congress on national historic preservation policy. It also provides a forum for influencing federal activities, programs, and policies that affect historic properties. In addition, the ACHP has a key role in carrying out the Preserve America program. Milford Wayne Donaldson, FAIA, of Sacramento, California, is chairman of the 23-member ACHP, which is served by a professional staff in Washington, D.C. For more information about the ACHP, contact: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 803 Washington, DC 20004 Phone: 202-606-8503 Web site: www.achp.gov and www.preserveamerica.gov Front cover photography (left to right): Fort Monroe Authority, NPS, ACHP FRONT MATTER | iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................... v ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. vi CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE ................................................................................................................................................... vii SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S MESSAGE ............................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................12 History of Executive Order No. 13287 ..........................................................................................................................................................12 Preserve America ........................................................................................................................................................................................................14 Previous Section 3 Reporting ...............................................................................................................................................................................14 Framework for 2012 Report to the President ...........................................................................................................................................21 CHAPTER 2: CURRENT STATE OF FEDERAL REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ..........................................22 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009) .................................................................................................................................23 Executive Order No. 13514, “Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance” (2009) .................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Issuance of Presidential Memorandum—America’s Great Outdoors (2010) .........................................................................23 Issuance of Presidential Memorandum—Disposing of Unneeded Federal Real Estate (2010) .....................................26 Issuance of Presidential Memorandum—Speeding Infrastructure Development through More Efficient and Effective Permitting and Environmental Review (2011)............................................................................................29 Correlation to Agencies’ Section 3 Progress Reports ............................................................................................................................29 CHAPTER 3: CURRENT STATE OF FEDERAL STEWARDSHIP .............................................................................33 Contributing to the Economy ..............................................................................................................................................................................34 Recreation and Tourism............................................................................................................................................................................................35 Cooperative Management and Use ..................................................................................................................................................................39 Community Revitalization .......................................................................................................................................................................................42 Building Partnerships .................................................................................................................................................................................................44 Managing Assets ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................46 Integrating Stewardship into Agency Planning ............................................................................................................................................51 Enhancing and Improving Inventories of Historic Properties .............................................................................................................58 Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................62 iv | FRONT MATTER CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................63 FINDING No. 1: Economic Development and Job Creation .............................................................................................................64 FINDING No. 2: Sustainability ..............................................................................................................................................................................66 FINDING No. 3: Renewable Energy .................................................................................................................................................................68 FINDING No. 4: Federal Real Property Realignment ............................................................................................................................70 FINDING No. 5: Federal Agency Preservation Programs in the 21st Century .......................................................................73 Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................75 CHAPTER 5: TOWARD A COMMON GOAL .............................................................................................................76 CASE STUDIES Section 106 Program Alternatives Streamline Agency Review and Compliance ...................................................................16 The National Park Service and Sustainability—At the Forefront of Assisting Federal Agencies ...................................19 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Contributions to Implementation of EO 13514 .....................................24 Job Creation Through Recovery Act Funding..............................................................................................................................................27 America’s Great Outdoors and Historic Resource Stewardship .....................................................................................................30 Sesquicentennial of the American Civil War (2009-2015) ..................................................................................................................37 Leasing of Historic Properties in National Park System Units ..........................................................................................................41 General Services Administration Reinvests Strategically to Sustain a Public Building Legacy ..........................................47 Bureau of Land Management’s Renewable Energy Efforts ..................................................................................................................53 Closure of Fort Monroe, Virginia and Creation of a New National Monument ....................................................................61 Preservation Green Lab: A Nonprofit’s Contribution to Sustainable Development ............................................................78 APPENDIX A: EXECUTIVE ORDER 13287, PRESERVE AMERICA..........................................................................80 APPENDIX B: ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION MEMBERSHIP ....................................83 APPENDIX C: ADVISORY GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTING SECTION 3: REPORTING PROGRESS ON THE IDENTIFICATION, PROTECTION, AND USE OF FEDERAL HISTORIC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CSRA Regionally Important Resources Plan
    CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER AREA REGIONAL COMMISSION Regionally Important Resources Plan Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................4 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................4 Natural Resources ..............................................................................................................................7 Natural Resources: Parks & Forested Areas .............................................................................9 Magnolia Springs State Park ................................................................................................. 11 Elijah Clark State Park ............................................................................................................ 12 A.H. Stephens Memorial State Park ..................................................................................... 13 Hamburg State Park ................................................................................................................ 14 Mistletoe State Park ................................................................................................................ 15 Natural Resources: Wildlife Management Areas .................................................................. 17 Clarks Hill Wildlife Management Area ............................................................................... 18 Di-Lane
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Innovation with Preservation
    Georgia’s State Historic Preservation Plan 2017-2021: INTEGRATING www.georgiashpo.org INNOVATION WITH Historic Preservation Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 2017 PRESERVATION Georgia’s State Historic Preservation Plan 2017-2021: INTEGRATING INNOVATION WITH PRESERVATION Historic Preservation Division JEWETT CENTER FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION 2610 GA HWY 155, SW Georgia Department of Natural Resources STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA 30281 www.georgiashpo.org 2017 770.389.7844 Credits Editor: Jennifer Dixon Principal Authors: With Contributions From: Jennifer Dixon Allison Asbrock William Hover Rachel Black Stephanie Cherry-Farmer Layout and Design: New South Associates, Inc. David Crass Barbara Fisher Photography: Jeff Harrison HPD staff unless otherwise noted Melissa Jest Rachel Rice Historic Preservation Planning Team: Lynn Speno David Crass Jennifer Dixon Bryan Tucker William Hover Bryan Tucker Note: The quotations throughout were taken from responses to the 2017-2021 Georgia State Historic Preservation Plan public input survey conducted in 2015. Department of Natural Resources Mark Williams, Commissioner Historic Preservation Division David Crass, Director Allison Asbrock, Jennifer Bedell, Rachel Black, Aimee Bouzigard, Stephanie Cherry-Farmer, Jennifer Dixon, Kim Feagler, Raluca Filimon, Barbara Fisher, Jeff Harrison, Josh Headlee, William Hover, Laura Beth Ingle, Melissa Jest, Sarah Love, Dona McKenzie, Molly McLamb, Susan Pursell, Rachel Rice, Meg Richardson, Leslie Spencer, Lynn Speno, Bryan Tucker, Katie Twomey, Debbie Wallsmith,
    [Show full text]
  • Case Statements
    Michelle Delaney Director, Smithsonian Consortium for Understanding the American Experience Office of the Under Secretary for History, Art, and Culture Smithsonian Institution [email protected] 202-633-3810 Civil War Sesquicentennial Working Group, NCPH--April 19, 2012 Case Study: Smithsonian Civil War 150 The Smithsonian Civil War 150 project is a collaborative, interdisciplinary, pan-Institutional initiative coordinating the Civil War commemorative exhibitions, educational programs and tours, symposia, publications, documentaries, podcasts, digitization initiatives, web and social media projects, and app being produced by scholars and educators at Smithsonian museums and research centers 2011-2015. The Smithsonian Civil War 150 steering committee was formed to encourage open and active collaboration between the Smithsonian units currently planning Sesquicentennial projects, including the Consortium for Understanding the American Experience, National Museum of American History, National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian American Art Museum, National Museum of African American History and Culture, National Museum of the American Indian, National Museum of Natural History, National Air and Space Museum, Anacostia Community Museum, Smithsonian Institution Archives, Smithsonian Libraries, Smithsonian Folkways, Smithsonian Networks, Smithsonian Books, Smithsonian Magazine, Smithsonian Journeys, and The Smithsonian Associates and Resident Associate Program. Smithsonian Civil War 150 projects explore the unique Civil War collections held at the Institution, the social, cultural, and technological impact of the war, and the history of the Institution during the war. Smithsonian historians and educators are interested in building new partnerships with national and international organizations, and developing innovative ways to present and interpret collections, and archive projects during the Sesquicentennial. During the American Civil War 1861-1865, the Smithsonian Castle stood as the only building representing the young Institution, and where history unfolded.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory Andersonville Memorial Landscape Andersonville National Historic Site 2010
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2010 Andersonville Memorial Landscape Andersonville National Historic Site Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Andersonville Memorial Landscape Andersonville National Historic Site Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI) is an evaluated inventory of all significant landscapes in units of the national park system in which the National Park Service has, or plans to acquire any enforceable legal interest. Landscapes documented through the CLI are those that individually meet criteria set forth in the National Register of Historic Places such as historic sites, historic designed landscapes, and historic vernacular landscapes or those that are contributing elements of properties that meet the criteria. In addition, landscapes that are managed as cultural resources because of law, policy, or decisions reached through the park planning process even though they do not meet the National Register criteria, are also included in the CLI. The CLI serves three major purposes. First, it provides the means to describe cultural landscapes on an individual or collective basis at the park, regional, or service-wide level. Secondly, it provides a platform to share information about cultural landscapes across programmatic areas and concerns and to integrate related data about these resources into park management. Thirdly, it provides an analytical tool to judge accomplishment and accountability. The legislative, regulatory, and policy direction for conducting the CLI include: National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 470h-2(a)(1)).
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 10244018 (Rev. W6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Johnson's Island Civil War Prison_________________________________ other names/site number N/A___________________________________________________ 2. Location street & number N/A I I not for publication N/A city, town Johnson T s Island, Danbury Township I I vicinity N/A state Ohio code OH county Ottawa code 123 zip code 43440 (mailing address; Lakeside-Marblehead) 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property UTI private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing rn public-local HX] district 249 buildings I I public-State [Usite ___1_ sites fx1 public-Federal I I structure ____ structures I I object _ _ objects __21Q_ Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A 1 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this I I nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Georgia State Parks and Historic Sites Division
    History of the Georgia State Parks and Historic Sites Division The formal development of state parks in the United States began in the early 20th Century and grew out of the National Parks movement. Yellowstone became the first national park in 1872, and the National Park System was established 1916. The concept of natural and scenic public recreation areas became immensely popular and Yosemite, Glacier and the Grand Canyon were soon developed. In 1921, six states met to discuss the concept of state parks at the call of then National Park Service Director Stephen Mather. The first National Conference of State Parks decided that the immediate objectives were to provide conservation of natural and scenic resources and to provide recreational outlets and alleviate excessive pressure on the first national parks. The automobile had opened new opportunities for touring Americans and outstanding natural areas and quiet contemplative spots were suddenly accessible. Auto touring rapidly increased and people sought places to visit, recreate and camp. State forest lands became an immediate target for this type activity and in 1927, Georgia Senate Resolution #21 stated that, "...the Indian Springs Reserve in the County of Butts ... containing ten (10) acres of land with the spring and improvements thereon, is hereby placed under the jurisdiction and control of the State Board of Forestry, the same to be converted and used for a State Park." Georgia, and the U.S. government, view their forests as agricultural areas where trees are crops to be harvested and renewed. The concept of permanent aesthetic natural areas did not fit into this scheme and Georgia soon established a parks system separate from the Georgia Forestry Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of a Civil War Prison in Blackshear, Georgia
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Fall 2019 Preserving the Memory of those Perilous Times: Archaeology of a Civil War Prison in Blackshear, Georgia Colin H. Partridge Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Partridge, Colin H., "Preserving the Memory of those Perilous Times: Archaeology of a Civil War Prison in Blackshear, Georgia" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2027. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/2027 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRESERVING THE MEMORY OF THOSE PERILOUS TIMES: ARCHAEOLOGY OF A CIVIL WAR PRISON IN BLACKSHEAR, GEORGIA by COLIN PARTRIDGE (Under the Direction of Ryan McNutt) ABSTRACT In the closing months of 1864 Confederate prison authorities were forced to evacuate the large stockade prisoner of war (POW) camps at Millen and Andersonville, Georgia in the face of General Sherman’s ‘March to the Sea.’ While attempting to evade Union forces, approximately 5,000 POWs were sent along the Atlantic and Gulf railroad in southeast Georgia, stopping just outside of the town of Blackshear. For three weeks prisoners and guards camped along a small tributary of the Alabaha River with only a few stakes to mark a deadline between them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Field Methods at Camp Lawton (9JS1)
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2016 A Comparison of Field Methods at Camp Lawton (9JS1) William C. Brant Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Brant, William C. 2016 A Comparison of Field Methods at Camp Lawton (9JS1). M.A. Thesis, Jack N. Averitt College of Graduate Studies, Georgia Southern University. This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 A COMPARISON OF FIELD METHODS AT CAMP LAWTON (9JS1) by WILLIAM C. BRANT (Under the Direction of Sue M. Moore) Camp Lawton was a Confederate POW Camp located in Jenkins County, Georgia during the latter part of the Civil War. This research uses shovel testing, metal detection, magnetometry, soil phosphate analysis, and terrestrial LiDAR scanning to attempt to ascertain which method, or combination of methods, is more effective on mid-19th century components in the Georgia Coastal Plain. Findings were inconclusive, but indicate that shovel testing and metal detection are the more effective methods. Data also suggest that areas of Confederate occupation at Camp Lawton probably covered a much larger area than previously anticipated. INDEX WORDS:Index Term: Camp Lawton, 9JS1, Jenkins County, Magnolia Springs State Park, Bo Ginn National Fish Hatchery, Civil War, Shovel Testing, Metal Detection, Magnetometry, Phosphate Analysis, Terrestrial LiDAR, Archaeology 2 A COMPARISON OF FIELD METHODS AT CAMP LAWTON (9JS1) by WILLIAM C.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Archeological Survey Techniques at Camp Lawton, a Civil War Prison Stockade
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2012 Comparison of Archeological Survey Techniques at Camp Lawton, a Civil War Prison Stockade James Kevin Chapman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Chapman, James Kevin, "Comparison of Archeological Survey Techniques at Camp Lawton, a Civil War Prison Stockade" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 623. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/623 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARISON OF ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNIQUES AT CAMP LAWTON, A CIVIL WAR PRISON STOCKADE by JAMES KEVIN CHAPMAN (Under the Direction of Sue Moore) ABSTRACT In 2009, Dr. Sue Moore of Georgia Southern University was contacted by State Archeologist Dr. Dave Crass of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division. He proposed an exploratory survey of the site of a Civil War Confederate prisoner of war camp known as Camp Lawton located on Magnolia Springs State Park and Bo Ginn National Fish Hatchery in Millen, Georgia. Camp Lawton was constructed, occupied, and abandoned over an approximately three month period in the fall of 1864. The survey served a twofold purpose. First, was to evaluate survey methods to determine the most efficient for use on this and similar sites.
    [Show full text]
  • SEAC Bulletin 53.Pdf
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 53 2010 Proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting October 27-30, 2010 Edited by George M. Crothers David Pollack Hilton Lexington / Downtown Hotel Lexington, Kentucky Hosted by Department of Anthropology University of Kentucky Meeting Organizers George M. Crothers David Pollack Richard W. Jefferies Steven Ahler ISSN-0584-410X TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. iii Co-Sponsors ................................................................................................................................................... iv Diagram of Meeting Facilities ....................................................................................................................... v Program Guide ............................................................................................................................................... 1 List of Sessions with Symposium Abstracts............................................................................................... 21 Student Paper Competition Entries ........................................................................................................... 28 Abstracts of Papers and Posters ................................................................................................................. 31 Alphabetical listing of all participants Current SEAC Officers ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4 – FOC 2018
    Page 1 of 82 Editors Nikita Moreira, Michael Derderian, Ashley Bissonnette Page 2 of 82 Table of Contents Conflict Archaeologies of Prisoner of War, Internment & Labor Camps Grey Ghosts: Searching for Confederates at Camp Lawton (9JS1), Georgia, USA Ryan K. McNutt…………………………………………………………………4 Archaeological Investigations of a Civil War Prison Camp Site (9PR26) at Blackshear, Georgia Colin Partridge………………………………………………………………….24 Heritage Tourism and Archaeological Education of a Civil War POW site. Rhianna Bennett………………………………………………………………...32 Roman Conflict Archaeology The Ancient Conflict Landscape of Kalkriese (Varian Disaster 9 CE): New Insights into the Course of the Battle and the Post-Battle Processes Achim Rost, Susanne Wilbers-Rost……………………………………………40 The Lusitanian Wars, a faceless conflict from the Archaeology of the 2nd century BC Luis Berrocal-Rangel…………………………………………………………..50 Material Culture The Social Significance of Weapons -- Taking Chinese Bronze Weapons As an Example Guo Yanli………………………………………………………………………61 Conflict on Two Continents: Archaeology and the Culture History of frontier New France Linda Naunapper……………………………………………………………….68 Page 3 of 82 Conflict Archaeologies of Prisoner of War, Internment & Labor Camps Grey Ghosts: Searching for Confederates at Camp Lawton (9JS1), Georgia, USA Ryan K. McNutt, PhD, R.P.A.1 1. Director, Camp Lawton Archaeological Project, Georgia Southern University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Statesboro, GA 30460 [email protected] POW Archaeology The sites of former prisoner of war camps, as well as internment and labor camps, are an increasing area of focus for conflict archaeology. Consisting of populations of people created by war, but who are not at war, they are often microcosms for interrelationships of humans engaged in conflict (Mytum and Carr 2013; Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • XRF and the Corrosion Environment at Camp Lawton: a Comprehensive Study of the Archeological Microenvironment of a Civil War Prison Camp
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2012 XRF and the Corrosion Environment at Camp Lawton: A Comprehensive Study of the Archeological Microenvironment of a Civil War Prison Camp Amanda L. Morrow Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Military History Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Morrow, Amanda L., "XRF and the Corrosion Environment at Camp Lawton: A Comprehensive Study of the Archeological Microenvironment of a Civil War Prison Camp" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1007. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1007 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. XRF AND THE CORROSION ENVIRONMENT AT CAMP LAWTON: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE ARCHEOLOGICAL MICROENVIRONMENT OF A CIVIL WAR PRISON CAMP by AMANDA L. MORROW (Under the Direction of Sue M. Moore) ABSTRACT Handheld X Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology is a new and emerging method in the field of archeology. This thesis discusses the results of XRF comparative analysis and comparative chemical analysis between a given ferrous metallic artifact’s corrosion environment (the surrounding soil matrix) and the subsequent corrosion products formed on the artifact. The hypothesis is that the data will demonstrate a chemical correlation between the two.
    [Show full text]