DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis and Implementation of Second Generation Criteria in a Stability Computer Code François Grinnaert

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis and Implementation of Second Generation Criteria in a Stability Computer Code François Grinnaert Analysis and implementation of second generation criteria in a stability computer code François Grinnaert To cite this version: François Grinnaert. Analysis and implementation of second generation criteria in a stability computer code. Fluid mechanics [physics.class-ph]. Université de Bretagne occidentale - Brest, 2017. English. NNT : 2017BRES0003. tel-01578973 HAL Id: tel-01578973 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01578973 Submitted on 30 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE / UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE présentée par sous le sceau de l’Université Bretagne Loire François Grinnaert pour obtenir le titre de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE Préparée à l'Ecole navale Mention : Génie mécanique, mécanique des fluides et énergétique École Doctorale des Sciences de la Mer Thèse soutenue le 19 janvier 2017 Etude et Implémentation des devant le jury composé de : Paola GUALENI, Professeur, rapporteur Critères de Seconde Génération Université de Gènes (Italie) Volker BERTRAM, Professeur, rapporteur dans un Code de Stabilité DNV GL, Hambourg (Allemagne) Pierre FERRANT, Professeur, Président de Jury Ecole Centrale de Nantes Claude BALANANT, Maître de Conférences Université de Bretagne Occidentale Jean-Marc LAURENS, Enseignant Chercheur HDR, Co directeur ENSTA Bretagne Jean Yves BILLARD, Professeur, Co directeur École navale Jérôme CAPUT, invité Etat-major de la Marine Jean-François LEGUEN, invité DGA Techniques Hydrodynamiques Analysis and Implementation of Second Generation Criteria in a Stability Computer Code François Grinnaert PhD Thesis Supervised by Jean-Yves Billard and Jean-Marc Laurens 19 January 2017 Ecole navale BCRM Brest – CC 600 F-29240 BREST Cedex 09 3 4 ABSTRACT The second generation intact stability criteria are currently under finalization by the International Maritime Organization. They are intended to improve the current intact stability rules by adding safety in waves. They are structured in five failure modes and three levels of assessment in each failure mode. The first level is based on a simplified deterministic approach of the phenomena and ensures high safety margins. The second level requires more complex computations based on hydrostatic considerations with regard to static waves and is expected to provide reduced safety margins. The third level, currently ude deelopet, ould osist of ueial siulatios of the ship’s ehaio i real sea states performed by specialized institutes. Level-one and level-two criteria of both pure loss of stability and parametric roll failure modes have been implemented in a stability code. The KGmax curves associated with these future criteria are computed for a selection of different ships of different types, both civilian and military, expected or known to have different behaviors with regard to the considered failure modes. The requirement and the relevance of the criteria are analyzed. The second check of parametric roll level-two criterion is thoroughly analyzed. A simplified method providing the maximum parametric roll angle assuming a linear GZ is developed and implemented in the corresponding criterion. RESUME Les ites de stailit à l’tat itat de seode gatio sot e ous de fialisatio pa l’Oganisation Maritime Internationale. Ils doivent compléter les critères actuels en apportant une sécurité accrue dans les vagues. Ils sont organisés en cinq modes de dfaillae et tois ieau d’aluatio das haue ode de dfaillae. Le peie niveau est basé sur une approche déterministe simplifiée des phénomènes et assure des marges de sécurité importantes. Le second niveau requiert des calculs plus complexes basés sur des considérations hydrostatiques dans les vagues. Il est supposé assurer des marges de sécurité réduites. Le troisième niveau, actuellement en cours de développement, devrait consister en des simulations numériques du comportement du navire sur des états de mer réels réalisés par des instituts spécialisés. Les deux premiers niveaux des modes de défaillance perte pure de stabilité et roulis paramétrique ont été implémentés dans un code de stabilité. Les courbes de KGmax associées à ces critères sont calculées pour une sélection de navires civils et militaires de différents types ayant des comportements connus ou supposés différents vis-à-vis de ces modes de défaillance. Les exigences et la pertinence des critères sont analysées. La seconde vérification du critère de niveau deux en roulis paramétrique est étudiée en détail. Une méthode simplifiée de alul de l’agle aiu de roulis paramétrique supposant un GZ linéaire est proposée et implémentée dans le critère correspondant. 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work is dedicated to my Father André Grinnaert and Xavier Castellani. I am deeply grateful to Jean-Yves Billard, Jean-Marc Laurens and Alcino Ferreira. I thank all people who helped, supported, encouraged me and everyone who made this project possible: Arman Ariffin, Jacques-André Astolfi, Anthony Auger-Ottavi, Benoit Augier, Jean-Luc Autret, Stéphane Baert, Claude Balanant, Thierry Barbu, Grégoire Bert, Volker Bertram, Romuald Bomont, Elisabeth Bondu, Luc Boucharé, Abdel Boudraa, Alain Boulch, Patricia Boutin, Jérôme Caput, Gilbert Caruana, Christophe Claramunt, David Colleau, Philippe Corrignan, Marie Coz, Jean-Louis d'Arbaumont, Marc de Briançon, Geoffroy de Kersauson, Maïté de La Broïse, François Deniset, Yannick Descorde, Rodrigue Devoye, Sébastien Drouelle, Vianney Droulle, Anne-Cécile Faucheux, Pierre Ferrant, Alberto Francescutto, Lancelot Frédéric, Jean-Michel Gahéry, Gédéon Gnimavo, Paola Gualeni, Dominique Hannart, Philippe Hello, Jean-Luc Herviou, Reinhard Jahn, Fred Jean, Olivier Jodon, Isabelle Knab-Delumeau, Stefan Krüger, Magalie Lamandé, Anne-Charlotte Lecat, Pascal Leclaire, Jean-François Leguen, Laurent Le Guen, David Lemestre, Yves-Marie Le Roy, Gwénaël Le Vaillant, Charles Lorieux, Benoît Lugan, Jean-Claude Marchadour, Philippe Martel, Carlo Martinelli, Sébastien Mayan, Patricia Merrien, Emmanuel Mogicato, Pierre Mouneyrou, Marie-France Mulard, Tri-an Nguyen, Christophe Olmi, Eric Pagès, Nicola Petacco, Xavier Pitollat, Anne Pitois, Philip Pons, Patrice Pourchau, Jean-Yves Pradillon, Yves Préaux, Stéphane Priou, Hannes van Rijn, Christine Rohou, Kostia Roncin, Stéphanie Rouge, Patrick Soufflot, Jacques Stéphan, Ludovic Thisselin, Bastien Tribout, Naoya Umeda, Rémi Urchulotégui, Pierre Vonier, Clève Wandji, Sylvie Yeomans, Anneke, the crew of the Schooner Etoile and the CRNAV Members. And of course Fernanda and Charlotte. 6 OUTLINE Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Résumé ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 6 Outline ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 10 Chapter 1. Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria ............................................................ 17 1.1. Pure Loss of Stability Failure Mode ................................................................................ 17 1.1.1. Physical Background and General Information ................................................ 17 1.1.2. Level One .......................................................................................................... 19 1.1.3. Level Two .......................................................................................................... 20 1.2. Parametric Roll Failure Mode ......................................................................................... 24 1.2.1. Historical and Physical Background .................................................................. 24 1.2.2. Level One .......................................................................................................... 26 1.2.3. Level Two .......................................................................................................... 27 1.2.4. Maximum Roll Angle and KGmax computation .................................................. 31 Chapter 2. Hydrostatic Computation ....................................................................................... 36 2.1. Generation of Volume Mesh .......................................................................................... 36 2.1.1. First Step ........................................................................................................... 37 2.1.2. Second Step ...................................................................................................... 38 2.2. Cutting a Volume Mesh by a Plane ................................................................................. 41 2.2.1. Decomposition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harren & Partner
    No. 3 - 2008, November on the Prestige and MSC Napoli cases Page 10-13 TheHarren & Partner GroupPage 8-9 MEMBER PORTRAIT Piracy preventative measures Page 16-17 The Swedish Club Letter 3–2008 Content Leading article The road ahead 3 Loss Prevention P&I www.excelload.com …a one-step source for cargo securing computation 4-5 Fatalities in enclosed spaces 6-7 Member portrait The Harren & Partner Group 8-9 Salvage Prestige and MSC Napoli: two very different approaches 10-13 Regulations IMO calls for increased damage stability of cargo and passenger vessels 12-13 ISM Spelling out the need to avoid a prescriptive ISM 14-15 Piracy Rocketing piracy calls for insurance review 16-17 Claims report New Flame – Progressing one of the most difficult wreck removals of recent times 18-21 Club Information News from Piraeus 21 Cargo Safe reefer operations onboard 22-23 MRM New MRM training providers 24 Out and About with MRM 24-25 FD&D Rule B attachment of EFTs – Are you playing offense, defense or both? 26-29 Claimants seeking to attach ”EFTs” head into overtime – Are you in the game? 30-33 Club Information News from Asia / New Members / Basic Facts 33 American Liberty ship becomes Greek 34 Out and About 35 Staff kick-off 36-37 Staff News 38 Public Holidays 38 Historical Corner – The Swedish Club Medical Center 1945-1955 39 Club Calendar 40 Head Office Sweden Greece 5th Floor, 87 Akti Miaouli Visiting adress Gullbergs Strandgata 6 GR-185 38 Piraeus 411 04 Göteborg Greece Tel +30 211 120 8400 Postal adress P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Ship-Breaking.Com
    Bulletin of information and analysis May 17th 2013 on ship demolition # 31 From January 1st to April 30th, 2013 Ship-breaking.com Content Overview January 1 to April 30 1 Miscellaneous : cable layer, 11 Gas tanker 39 MSC Flaminia 2 offshore, dredger, research Combinated carrier / OBO 40 Baco-Liner 4 Passenger ship - 13 Ro Ro 41 Marseille, the waiting room for 4 Ferry 14 Bulk carrier 44 scrapping in Asia (Fish) Factory ship 16 General cargo 70 The scandalous export of the 5 Barge carrier 18 Car carrier 87 Lyubov Orlova Container ship 18 The END : no answer from 88 Welcome to Chennai Port, the 7 Reefer 30 France Telecom cable layer Nightmare before Scrapping Oil tanker 31 Chamarel Letters to the Editor 9 Chemical tanker 38 Sources 90 Overview January 1st to April 30th 2013 416 vessels left for demolition during the first four months of the year. The cumulative scrapping will permit 3.5 millions tonnes of metal to be recycled. 392 (94%) went to Asia; 149 vessels (36%) were built in Europe, 158 (38%) were owned by European companies. The Asian market continues to be the principal destination for European ship-owners. It is the best destination to make one last profit of an aging fleet which is not adapted to new international commercial maritime standards. To be noted is the percentage of container ships which continues to increase and reached 19% of the vessels to be demolished. India is the country which benefits from this flow. 55% of this category of vessels are 20 years old or less.
    [Show full text]
  • Boskalis Corporate Presentation
    Financials Business Case Roadshow Slide Pack August 2021 25082021 Index 01 Introduction 05 Sustainability 02 Group financials 06 Strategy 03 Segment results 07 Share Information 04 Balance Sheet 08 Our activities 2 Company overview ▪ Leading global dredging & maritime expert ▪ With 9,900 employees and 650 vessels (incl JV’s) ▪ Active in more than 90 countries across 6 continents ▪ Customers in Energy, Ports and Infra ▪ Headquarters in Papendrecht, the Netherlands ▪ Listed on Euronext 3 Our world Revenue by region (HY2021) 2%10% 18% The Netherlands 9% Rest of Europe Australia / Asia Middle East 21% Africa 40% North and South America 4 Our mission, purpose and values To be the leading dredging and marine Mission contracting experts, creating new horizons for all our stakeholders We create and protect welfare and Purpose advance the energy transition ▪ NINA ▪ Professional Values ▪ Team player ▪ Responsible ▪ Entrepreneurial 5 Strong contribution to the SDGs: 88% of 2020 revenue Helping to deliver Safeguarding Creating resilient Preventing and Contribution to an modern and cleaner people, nature & infrastructure for reducing marine economy and the energy infrastructure assets from the trade, transport and pollution through creation of jobs impacts of climate society salvage directly and change indirectly through our projects and the We contribute We contribute We contribute We contribute supply chain. through our through climate through maritime through salvaging of renewables, change adaptive infrastructure such vessels and (in)directly all
    [Show full text]
  • MSC Napoli Report
    Explosive Separation of MSC NAPOLI MSC Napoli is a UK flagged container ship built in 1991. Some 275 metres in length, with a beam of 37 metres, she weighs 53,409 gross tonnes. On Thursday 18 January 2007 she suffered flooding to the engine room during force 8 gales, whilst 40 miles south of Cornwall. The 26 crew abandoned ship and were safely rescued from their lifeboat by helicopter, whilst the vessel grounded off the south coast of England. Working in challenging conditions, SMIT salvage removed over 2000 shipping containers and pumped out the majority of the 4 000 tonnes of bunker oil on board in an attempt to salvage the vessel. On the morning of 9 July 2007 SMIT Salvage re-floated the MSC Napoli, and brought her to deeper water, where she was dewatered and inspected. Once re-floated however, it became apparent that the damage she had sustained would prevent her from being towed. After being continuously pounded by bad weather, cracks on both sides of the ship worsened and the stern of the ship gradually started settling lower in the water. With the risk of the vessel sinking, the Secretary of States Representative (SOSREP) for Marine Salvage, made the decision to ground her again. The stern section was grounded and ballasted down with 30 tonnes of sand, east of Sidmouth to minimize any environmental impact or risk to other vessels. At this stage it was decided to separate the stern and bows section of the vessel, at the vessels shear point, immediately forward of the superstructure.
    [Show full text]
  • (AGCS) Safety & Shipping Review 2021
    ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE & SPECIALTY Safety and Shipping Review 2021 An annual review of trends and developments in shipping losses and safety SAFETY AND SHIPPING REVIEW 2021 About AGCS Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) is a leading global corporate insurance carrier and a key business unit of Allianz Group. We provide risk consultancy, Property‑Casualty insurance solutions and alternative risk transfer for a wide spectrum of commercial, corporate and specialty risks across 10 dedicated lines of business. Our customers are as diverse as business can be, ranging from Fortune Global 500 companies to small businesses, and private individuals. Among them are not only the world’s largest consumer brands, tech companies and the global aviation and shipping industry, but also satellite operators or Hollywood film productions. They all look to AGCS for smart answers to their largest and most complex risks in a dynamic, multinational business environment and trust us to deliver an outstanding claims experience. Worldwide, AGCS operates with its own teams in 31 countries and through the Allianz Group network and partners in over 200 countries and territories, employing around 4,400 people. As one of the largest Property‑ Casualty units of Allianz Group, we are backed by strong and stable financial ratings. In 2020, AGCS generated a total of €9.3 billion gross premium globally. www.agcs.allianz.com 2 PAGE 4 Executive summary PAGE 10 Losses in focus: 2011 to 2020 Trends PAGE 18 1. The Covid factors PAGE 28 2. Larger vessels PAGE 38 3. Supply chains and ports PAGE 42 4. Security and sanctions PAGE 48 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Fires and Firefighting Operations on Fully Cellular Container Vessels Over the Period 2000 – 2015
    Analysis of fires and firefighting operations on fully cellular container vessels over the period 2000 – 2015 Diploma dissertation for the award of the academic degree "Diplom-Wirtschaftsingenieur für Seeverkehr (FH)" (BSc equivalent in marine industrial engineering) in the Summer semester of 2016 submitted to Bremen University of Applied Sciences – Faculty 5 "Nature and Engineering" on the study course "Diplom-Wirtschaftsingenieur für Seeverkehr" (nautical science) Examined by: Professor Captain Thomas Jung Co-examiner: Captain Ute Hannemann Submitted by: Helge Rath, Neustadtswall 14, 28199 Bremen, Germany Phone: 0170-5582269 Email: [email protected] Student registration no.: 355621 Date: Thursday, September 01, 2016 Foreword I Foreword I remember walking with my grandfather by the locks of the Kiel Canal in Brunsbüttel as a small child and marveling at the ships there. Thanks to his many years working as an electrician on the locks, my grandfather was able to tell me a lot about the ships that passed through. And it was these early impressions that first awakened my interest in shipping. Having completed a "vacation internship" at the age of 17 at the shipping company Leonhardt & Blumberg (Hamburg), I decided to train as a ship's mechanic. A year later, I started training at the Hamburg-based shipping company Claus-Peter Offen and qualified after 2 ½ years. I then worked for 18 months as a ship's mechanic on the jack-up vessel THOR, operated by Hochtief Solutions AG, which gave me the opportunity to gain a wealth of experience in all things nautical. While studying for my degree in nautical science at the Bremen University of Applied Sciences, I spent the semester breaks on two different fully cellular container vessels owned by the shipping company Claus-Peter Offen to further my knowledge as a ship's engineer and prospective nautical engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship-Breaking.Com Information Bulletins on Ship Demolition, # 8 - 11 from January 1, to December 31, 2007
    Ship-breaking.com Information bulletins on ship demolition, # 8 - 11 from January 1, to December 31, 2007 Robin des Bois 2008 Press release January, 24th 2008 Global Statement 2007 of Shipping Vessels Sent to Demolition For the 2nd consecutive year, Robin des Bois has been studying in detail the reality of the ship breaking market. The mobilisation and the analysis of about thirty diverse and specialised bibliographical sources made it possible to establish an inventory of the vessels sent to be demolished in 2007. In 2006, Robin des Bois tallied 293 vessels sold for demolition. In 2007, we listed 288 of them. If this decline in demolished vessels is modest (-2%), it is a little more significant with regard to the total weight of recycled metals: 1.7 million ton in 2007 against 1.9 million in 2006 (-10%). The situation differs however according to the category of ships considered: the number of tankers (oil tankers, chemical tankers, gas carriers) dismantled in 2007 increased by almost 30 % compared with 2006 whereas that of the bulk carriers and other general cargo ships decreased by almost 40 %; the average age of the tankers sent to demolition is 29 years, the average age for all the vessels is 31 years, the average age of bulk carriers 34 years. Of the 288 vessels, 95 (33 %) were under a European flag or belonged to ship-owners established in the European Union or members of the European Association of Free Exchange (EFTA) or members of the principalities like Monaco. Not one of the international exchanges linking these European ship-owners to non-European demolition sites were preceded by any asbestos removal.
    [Show full text]
  • ME1308: Design and Co-Ordination of the Programme by Cefas
    General enquiries on this form should be made to: . Defra, Science Directorate, Management Support and Finance Team, Telephone No. 02072381612 . E-mail: [email protected] defr~ SID 5 Research Project Final Report • Nole In line with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, Defra aims to place the results I Project identification of its completed research projects in the public domain wherever possible. The 1. Defra Project code I_M_E_1_3_0_8 _ SID 5 (Research Project Final Report) is designed to capture the information on the results and outputs of Defra-funded 2. Projecttille research in a format that is easily Provision of Scientific and Technical Expertise with publishable through the Defra website. A Regard to the Grounding of the MSC Napoli in Lyme SID 5 must be completed for all projects. Bay, Dorset • This form is in Word format and the boxes may be expanded or reduced, as 3. Contractor Cefas appropriate. organisation(s) Pakefield Road • ACCESS TO INFORMATION Lowestoft The information collected on this form will Suffolk NR33 OHT be stored electronically and may be sent to any part of Defra, or to individual researchers or organisations outside Defra for the purposes of reviewing the project. Defra may also disclose the 4. Total Defra project costs IL£__1_3_9L,7_0_2__1 information to any outside organisation (agreed fixed price) acting as an agent authorised by Defra to process final research reports on its 5. Project: start date I__3_0_J_a_nU_a_ry'--20_0_7__' behalf. Defra intends to publish this form on its website, unless there are strong reasons not to, which fully comply with end date 1 31 March 2008 1 exemptions under the Environmental Information Regulations or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Pollution Damage in Australia: Implementing the Bunker Oil Convention 2001 and the Supplementary Fund Protocol 2003
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by e-Prints Soton MARINE POLLUTION DAMAGE IN AUSTRALIA: IMPLEMENTING THE BUNKER OIL CONVENTION 2001 AND THE SUPPLEMENTARY FUND PROTOCOL 2003 * NICHOLAS GASKELL AND CRAIG FORREST I INTRODUCTION The grounding of the bulk carrier Pasha Bulker on Nobbys beach, Newcastle in June 2007 has again highlighted the risk from shipping posed to Australia‟s extensive and environmentally fragile coastline.1 Whilst a pollution incident was averted in this case, spills from shipping in other states, such as the Nakhodka spill off Japan in 1997,2 the Prestige spill off France in 1999,3 the Erika spill off Spain in 20034 and the Hebei Spirit spill of South Korea in 2007,5 have required the constant monitoring and updating of the international regulatory regimes designed to prevent such incidents occurring and to provide compensation when they nevertheless do occur. Two recent additions to this international regulatory system are the Protocol on the Establishment of a Supplementary Fund for Oil Pollution Damage, 20036 and the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage 2001.7 In 2008, Australia gave effect to these instruments, enacting the Supplementary Fund Protocol via the Protection of the Sea Legislation Amendment Act 2008 (Cth),8 while the Bunker Oil Convention is given effect through the Protection of the Sea (Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage) Act 2008 * David Jackson Professor of Maritime and Commercial Law, Institute of Maritime Law, University of Southampton; Barrister, Quadrant Chambers, London. Although the writer attended many of the meetings and diplomatic conferences referred to in the text as a representative of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), the views expressed here are his own.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Monitoring Conducted in Lyme Bay Following the Grounding of MSC Napoli in January 2007, with an Assessment of Impact
    Science Series Aquatic Environment Monitoring Report no. 61 Environmental monitoring conducted in Lyme Bay following the grounding of MSC Napoli in January 2007, with an assessment of impact Science Series Aquatic Environment Monitoring Report no. 61 Environmental monitoring conducted in Lyme Bay following the grounding of MSC Napoli in January 2007, with an assessment of impact This report should be cited as: Environmental monitoring conducted in Lyme Bay following the grounding of MSC Napoli in January 2007, with an assessment of impact. Sci. Ser. Aquat. Environ. Monit. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 61: 36pp. This report was compiled and edited by Robin Law of the Cefas Burnham Laboratory, Remembrance Avenue, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex CM0 8HA. A copy can be obtained by downloading from the Cefas website www.cefas.co.uk. © Crown copyright, 2008 This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. This publication is also available at www.cefas.co.uk For any other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.hmso.gov.uk/copyright/licences/ core/core_licence.htm, or by writing to: HMSO’s Licensing Division St Clements House 2-16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 E-mail: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter from the Storm – the Problem of Places of Refuge for Ships in Distress and Proposals to Remedy the Problem Anthony Morrison University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2011 Shelter from the Storm – the problem of places of refuge for ships in distress and proposals to remedy the problem Anthony Morrison University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Morrison, Anthony, Shelter from the Storm – the problem of places of refuge for ships in distress and proposals to remedy the problem, Doctor of Philosopy thesis, University of Wollongong, Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong, 2011. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3218 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact Manager Repository Services: [email protected]. Shelter from the Storm –the problem of places of refuge for ships in distress and proposals to remedy the problem. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY from UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG by ANTHONY MORRISON, BA(Sydney), LLM (Hons) (Sydney), Grad Dip Env Law (Sydney), Dip Shipping Law (London) AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL CENTRE FOR OCEAN RESOURCES AND SECURITY (ANCORS) FACULTY OF LAW 2011 iii CERTIFICATION I, Anthony Morrison, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in the Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Anthony Morrison 20 December 2010 v ABSTRACT When a ship gets into difficulties, one of the main options of an owner or master is to seek to put into sheltered waters where the difficulties can be remedied or minimised before proceeding on the voyage.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2014
    European Maritime Safety Agency Marine Casualties and Incidents 2014 ANNUAL OVERVIEW OF MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS 2014 © Photo credits: DK/DMAIB, DE/BSU, GR/HBMCI, IT/MCIB, MT/MSIU, PT/GPIAM, SE/SAIA, SP/CIAIM, UK/MAIB, Shutterstock, dvoevnore/Shutterstock.com © European Maritime Safety Agency, 2014 Reproduction, publication, quotes or any other means of reuse of the text of this publication is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The use of EMSA logo is prohibited. Statistics, tables, graphs, charts and maps have been generated by EMSA based on information contained in EMCIP. ANNUAL OVERVIEW OF MARINE CASUALTIES AND INCIDENTS 2014 Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2014 OVERVIEW OF KEY FIGURES Key figures for 2013 as reported in the European database on marine accidents 2 European Maritime Safety Agency 3 Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2014 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 CHAPTER 1 10 INTRODUCTION 10 Background 11 Scope 11 Content of the review 12 CHAPTER 2 14 MARINE CASUALTIES IN GENERAL 14 2.1 Involvement of EU Member State as flag State, coastal State or substantially interested State 17 2.2 Type of occurrences 20 CHAPTER 3 22 ACCIDENTS BY SHIP CATEGORY 22 CHAPTER 4 28 NATURE OF OCCURRENCE 28 4.1 Casualty with a ship 29 4.2 Occupational accidents 31 4 Table of contents CHAPTER 5 32 CONSEQUENCES 32 5.1 Consequences to the ship 33 5.2 Consequences to persons 39 5.3 Other consequences 42 CHAPTER 6 44 ACCIDENT LOCATION 44 6.1 Voyages 45 6.2 Location of accidents 46 6.3 Regional distribution 48 CHAPTER 7 52 ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BODIES 52 APPENDICES Appendix 1 57 Appendix 2 63 Appendix 3 70 5 Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2014 6 European Maritime Safety Agency NOTICE DISCLAIMER Article 1 of Directive 2009/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of The marine casualty and incident data presented is strictly for information 23 April 2009 establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation purposes only.
    [Show full text]