Wetland Mosquito Survey Handbook Assessing Suitability of British Wetlands for Mosquitoes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wetland Mosquito Survey Handbook Assessing Suitability of British Wetlands for Mosquitoes Wetland Mosquito Survey Handbook Assessing suitability of British wetlands for mosquitoes Frances M. Hawkes, Jolyon M. Medlock, Alexander G.C. Vaux, Robert A. Cheke, Gabriella Gibson ENTER WETLAND MOSQUITO SURVEY HANDBOOK Assessing Suitability of British Wetlands for Mosquitoes WETLAND MOSQUITO SURVEY HANDBOOK Wetland Mosquito Survey Handbook Authors: Frances M. Hawkes1, Jolyon M. Medlock2, Alexander G.C. Vaux2, Robert A. Cheke1, Gabriella Gibson1 1Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich at Medway, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, United Kingdom 2Medical Entomology group, Public Health England, Manor Farm Road, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, United Kingdom Contributing authors: Timothy G. Acott1; Peter A. Coates2; Adriana Ford3 1School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Greenwich, 10 Stockwell Street, London SE10 9BD, United Kingdom 2Centre for Environmental Humanities, University of Bristol, Beacon House, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1QU, United Kingdom 3Imperial College London, Department of Life Sciences, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom Suggested citation: Hawkes, F.M., Medlock, J.M., Vaux, A.G.C., Cheke, R.A, and Gibson, G (2020) Wetland Mosquito Survey Handbook: Assessing suitability of British wetlands for mosquitoes. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, UK. All photos by the authors, unless otherwise stated. Mosquito photos: Anders Lindström, Statens veterinärmedicinska anstalt (Swedish National Veterinary Institute, SVA), Ulls väg 2B, Uppsala, Sweden. Production coordinator: Gillian Summers, NRI Art direction: Simon Pointer & Geoff Denney, GDA Creative Design. www.gdcreative.co.uk Acknowledgements: We are very grateful to reserve managers and staff of the wetland areas in which we undertook the field work used to support this publication for providing significant support and access: Bedford Borough Council, Clinton Devon Estates, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Milton Keynes Parks Trust, Natural England, North Lincolnshire Council, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Somerset Wildlife Trust, Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, and Wyre Forest District Council. In particular we thank Chris Hainsworth for providing feedback on a draft of this publication. This book was developed as part of the WetlandLIFE project (www.wetlandlife.org), which was supported by funding from the Valuing Nature Programme (www.valuing-nature.net), which is funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, the Economic and Social Research Council, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. This work was supported by NERC grant reference number NE/N013379/1. We thank the rest of the WetlandLIFE project team for feedback and discussion, and the Valuing Nature Programme Coordination team for their support. ISBN13: 9780900822100 ISBN13: 978-0-900822-10-0 www.wetlandlife.org The views and designations expressed in this publication are those of its authors and do not represent officially adopted views of the University of Greenwich, Public Health England, the University of Bristol, Imperial College London, or the Valuing Nature Programme Coordination Team. Mention of commercial products or services does not constitute an endorsement. ASSESSING SUITABILITY OF BRITISH WETLANDS FOR MOSQUITOES CONTENTS Foreword v Preface vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Introducing mosquitoes 1 1.2 What are wetlands? 2 1.3 What is the link between wetlands and mosquitoes? 2 1.4 The value of wetlands in Britain today: examples from England 4 1.5 Wetland expansion and mosquito habitat 6 Further reading 7 2. Mosquitoes and their place in British wetlands 8 Further reading 14 3. Public health issues associated with mosquitoes 15 3.1 Nuisance biting 15 3.2 Responding to a mosquito nuisance 17 3.3 Disease 19 3.3.1 Human Malaria 20 3.3.2 Arboviruses 21 3.4 Non-native species 22 3.5 Public perceptions of mosquitoes 23 Further reading 24 4. Historical perspectives on Britain’s ‘nuisance’ mosquitoes between the Wars 25 Further reading 29 5. Introduction to mosquito biology and ecology 30 5.1 Taxonomy 30 5.2 Recorded mosquitoes of Britain 30 5.3 Life cycle 31 5.4 Oviposition habitats 35 5.5 Functional groups 35 Further reading 37 6. Species profiles 38 Aedes cantans and Aedes annulipes 39 Aedes caspius 42 Aedes cinereus and Aedes geminus 45 Aedes detritus 48 Aedes punctor and Aedes rusticus 51 Aedes vexans 54 Anopheles claviger 57 WETLAND MOSQUITO SURVEY HANDBOOK Anopheles maculipennis sensu lato 61 Coquillettidia richiardii 64 Culex modestus 67 Culex pipiens sensu lato and Culex torrentium 70 Culiseta annulata 74 Culiseta morsitans 77 Further reading 80 7. Mosquito species associations with wetland habitat types 81 7.1 Introduction to the species prediction tool 81 7.2 Wetland mosquito prediction tool 84 7.3 Mosquito habitats 90 7.3.1 Brackish Habitats 90 7.3.2 Freshwater Habitats 91 8. Mosquito surveying and control 98 8.1 Adult sampling 99 8.2 Larval sampling 102 8.3 Sample storage 104 8.4 Species identification and reporting 104 8.5 Mosquito control 105 Further reading 109 Appendices 110 Appendix I – Glossary 111 Appendix II – Abbreviations 113 Appendix III - Summary of the impact of wetland creation and management on British mosquito species, with summary of potential for mitigation and possible nuisance/vector concern. 114 Further reading 118 Appendix IV – Generalised adult mosquito anatomy 119 Appendix V – Simple key to adult female Culicidae 122 Further reading 123 Appendix VI – Simple key to 4th instar larvae of Culicidae 124 Further reading 125 Appendix VII – Identification of some British mosquitoes according to tarsal patterns 126 Appendix VIII – Comparison of aquatic larvae and adult wing patterns of mosquitoes with morphologically similar fly taxa 127 Appendix IX – Data sheets for mosquito reporting 129 Appendix X – Useful contacts 130 For mosquito reporting 130 For pest control 130 Appendix XI – NBN Data Providers 130 ASSESSING SUITABILITY OF BRITISH WETLANDS FOR MOSQUITOES FOREWORD It is an exciting time for people who care about biodiversity in the United Kingdom. There is an increasing realisation about what we have lost over the last 50 years and a growing understanding of what biodiversity and natural habitats contribute to the nation’s economy and its people’s well-being. There is widespread enthusiasm about habitat restoration and recreation, as well as new ideas about how “nature-based solutions” may help us to confront some of the major challenges of the 21st century such as climate change, often more cheaply than human-based alternatives. I share this excitement and sense of optimism, but strongly believe that to improve our environment to benefit both us and biodiversity we need to squarely and fairly address the constituencies that may in the short term lose out from these changes. For example, as the UK replaces the agricultural subsidies in the Common Agricultural Policy with payments based on “public money for public good” it is critical for environmentalists to engage with the farming industry to address their concerns, and ideally forge a consensus of how change is best introduced. The case of wetlands is another example where the potential for negative effects has to be taken into account and this book considers the possibility of the increased nuisance from more biting mosquitoes. This is an important topic because wetlands are a relatively easy habitat type to recreate and there have been some outstanding successful projects over the last couple of decades. These range from small urban projects, such as the London Wetland Centre in Barnes that provides an introduction to wetland biology to a massive population in its immediate vicinity, to the Somerset Levels, which now consist of a network of reserves with wonderfully enhanced biodiversity and a richness of breeding birds I could only of dreamed about as a teenager in the 1970s when I taught myself birdwatching in an area that was then largely devoted to active peat extraction. We are hugely fortunate that in the UK the nuisance from mosquito biting is much less than further north in Europe or at similar latitudes to ours in much of North America, and that the risk of disease transmission is currently negligible. Nevertheless, we risk undermining the positive gains from wetland restoration and creation if we do not take seriously, and address, the legitimate concerns of local people who may be negatively impacted by changes in mosquito populations. The authors of this book should be congratulated on providing an immensely important compendium of knowledge to assess and address exactly this issue. Written in a clear and accessible style, it explains exactly what might be the consequences of new wetland sites to population levels of biting mosquitoes, and provides a novel prediction tool that will be very valuable to habitat managers and public health workers. It provides vignettes of the most important mosquito species and their ecologies, information on sampling and control, and much to be welcomed simplified identification keys to adults and larvae (that I hope will give more people the courage to move onto the more technical literature). It also addresses the very significant issue of engaging with people experiencing issues with mosquitoes who may not be biologists (though some will be very expert) but bring critically important novel perspectives to the discussion. Speaking down to such audiences is highly counter-productive (as I know from experience having foolishly told my wife she would be less bothered by the biting mosquitoes in the garden – Aedes cantans – if she knew their scientific name!). Asking people to love mosquitoes is a hard sell, but I hope that non-entomologists coming to this topic for the first time will at least be fascinated by the rich biology of these insects. How extraordinary is it that one of the commonest British mosquitoes (Culex pipiens) has two types – the common one which is the mosquito most frequently seen in houses overwintering that almost exclusively feeds on birds, and one found in the London underground that is highly partial to humans.
Recommended publications
  • Genus Claviger Preyssler, 1790 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) in the Low Beskid Mts.(Poland) - New Sites and Host Affiliation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Title: Genus Claviger Preyssler, 1790 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) in the Low Beskid Mts.(Poland) - new sites and host affiliation Author: Artur Taszakowski, Bartosz Baran, Natalia Kaszyca, Łukasz Depa Citation style: Taszakowski Artur, Baran Bartosz, Kaszyca Natalia, Depa Łukasz. (2015). Genus Claviger Preyssler, 1790 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) in the Low Beskid Mts.(Poland) - new sites and host affiliation. "Nature Journal" (Nr 48 (2015), s. 114-119) NATURE JOURNAL VOL. 48: 114–119 (2015) OPOLE SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY GENUS CLAVIGER PREYSSLER , 1790 (C OLEOPTERA : STAPHYLINIDAE : PSELAPHINAE ) IN THE LOW BESKID MTS . (P OLAND ) – NEW SITES AND HOST A FFILIATION 1,3 2,4 1,2,5 1,6 ARTUR TASZAKOWSKI , BARTOSZ BARAN , NATALIA KASZYCA , ŁUKASZ DEPA 1 University of Silesia, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Zoology, Bankowa 9, 40 – 007 Katowice 2Students’ Scientific Association of Zoologists „Faunatycy” U Ś [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT : In the area of Poland there occur two species of the genus: Claviger longicornis P.W.J. Müller, 1818 and Claviger testaceus Preyssler, 1790. Both species are rare in Poland. Beetles of the genus Claviger are specialized myrmecophiles and are dependent on their host ants throughout the whole life cycle. During the field research, which were conducted in the Low Beskid Mts. (South-Eastern Poland), new sites of both species were found. C. longicornis was recorded in a colony of Lasius sabularum (Bondroit, 1918) and this is the first record of this ant as its host .
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key for Mosquito Species
    ‘Reverse’ identification key for mosquito species More and more people are getting involved in the surveillance of invasive mosquito species Species name used Synonyms Common name in the EU/EEA, not just professionals with formal training in entomology. There are many in the key taxonomic keys available for identifying mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance, but they are almost all designed for professionally trained entomologists. Aedes aegypti Stegomyia aegypti Yellow fever mosquito The current identification key aims to provide non-specialists with a simple mosquito recog- Aedes albopictus Stegomyia albopicta Tiger mosquito nition tool for distinguishing between invasive mosquito species and native ones. On the Hulecoeteomyia japonica Asian bush or rock pool Aedes japonicus japonicus ‘female’ illustration page (p. 4) you can select the species that best resembles the specimen. On japonica mosquito the species-specific pages you will find additional information on those species that can easily be confused with that selected, so you can check these additional pages as well. Aedes koreicus Hulecoeteomyia koreica American Eastern tree hole Aedes triseriatus Ochlerotatus triseriatus This key provides the non-specialist with reference material to help recognise an invasive mosquito mosquito species and gives details on the morphology (in the species-specific pages) to help with verification and the compiling of a final list of candidates. The key displays six invasive Aedes atropalpus Georgecraigius atropalpus American rock pool mosquito mosquito species that are present in the EU/EEA or have been intercepted in the past. It also contains nine native species. The native species have been selected based on their morpho- Aedes cretinus Stegomyia cretina logical similarity with the invasive species, the likelihood of encountering them, whether they Aedes geniculatus Dahliana geniculata bite humans and how common they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Genome Skimming of Arthropod-Preserving Ethanol Benjamin Linard, P
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving ethanol Benjamin Linard, P. Arribas, C. Andújar, A. Crampton-Platt, A. P. Vogler To cite this version: Benjamin Linard, P. Arribas, C. Andújar, A. Crampton-Platt, A. P. Vogler. Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving ethanol. Molecular Ecology Resources, Wiley/Blackwell, 2016, 16 (6), pp.1365-1377. 10.1111/1755-0998.12539. hal-01636888 HAL Id: hal-01636888 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01636888 Submitted on 17 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving 2 ethanol 3 Linard B.*1,4, Arribas P.*1,2,5, Andújar C.1,2, Crampton-Platt A.1,3, Vogler A.P. 1,2 4 5 1 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 6 5BD, UK, 7 2 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot 8 SL5 7PY, UK, 9 3 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Matthew Immelg Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Revision and Reclassification of the Genera of Phalacridae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Matthew immelG Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gimmel, Matthew, "Revision and Reclassification of the Genera of Phalacridae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2857. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2857 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. REVISION AND RECLASSIFICATION OF THE GENERA OF PHALACRIDAE (COLEOPTERA: CUCUJOIDEA) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Matthew Gimmel B.S., Oklahoma State University, 2005 August 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the following individuals for accommodating and assisting me at their respective institutions: Roger Booth and Max Barclay (BMNH), Azadeh Taghavian (MNHN), Phil Perkins (MCZ), Warren Steiner (USNM), Joe McHugh (UGCA), Ed Riley (TAMU), Mike Thomas and Paul Skelley (FSCA), Mike Ivie (MTEC/MAIC/WIBF), Richard Brown and Terry Schiefer (MEM), Andy Cline (CDFA), Fran Keller and Steve Heydon (UCDC), Cheryl Barr (EMEC), Norm Penny and Jere Schweikert (CAS), Mike Caterino (SBMN), Michael Wall (SDMC), Don Arnold (OSEC), Zack Falin (SEMC), Arwin Provonsha (PURC), Cate Lemann and Adam Slipinski (ANIC), and Harold Labrique (MHNL).
    [Show full text]
  • Culex Pipiens S.S
    Mosquito Surveillance and Management in Turkey Filiz GÜNAY and Bülent Alten Native and non-native vector management in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East (EMME) 18-20 April 2018, Cyprus MOSQUITO BORN DISEASES IN TURKEY 1970 2013 Vector species in Turkey Widespread in the 1994 - 2012 2017 Number of cases Number of Anopheles sacharovi Number of cases Number of Malaria past cases Anopheles superpictus 170.000 84.345 - 5 cases 101 285(MoH) West Nile Vector species in Turkey Culex pipiens s.s. Difficult to control Egean, Mediterranean, Blood samples from Human Central, South East, Birds Horse Dog and Cow Encephelitis Culex quinquefasciatus Anatolia Culex perexiguus Vector species in the world Aedes aegypti Rearly seen in Turkey Central Anatolia antigens in Dengue Aedes albopictus serum of animals Past studies on Mosquito Surveillance in Turkey Parrish 1959 Ramsdale et.al. 2001 Aldemir et.al. 2009 SOVE Simsek et.al. 2011 1 Anopheles algeriensis Anopheles algeriensis 2 Anopheles claviger Anopheles claviger § D Parrish 1959 3 Anopheles hyrcanus Anopheles hyrcanus 4 Anopheles maculipennis ss Anopheles maculipennis ss 5 Anopheles messeae The Mosquitoes of Turkey 6 Anopheles sacharovi Anopheles sacharovi 7 Anopheles melanoon Anopheles (subalpinus) melanoon Anopheles melanoon 52 Tür; Anopheles (13), Aedes (17), Culex (16), Culiseta (4), 8 Anopheles marteri Anopheles marteri 9 Anopheles plumbeus Anopheles plumbeus Uranotaenia (1), Orthopodomyia (1). 10 Anopheles pulcherrimus 11 Anopheles superpictus Anopheles superpictus 12 Acartomyia phoeniciae
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © and Moral Rights for This Thesis Are Retained by the Author And/Or Other Copyright Owners
    Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", Canterbury Christ Church University, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis. Renita Danabalan PhD Ecology Mosquitoes of southern England and northern Wales: Identification, Ecology and Host selection. Table of Contents: Acknowledgements pages 1 Abstract pages 2 Chapter1: General Introduction Pages 3-26 1.1 History of Mosquito Systematics pages 4-11 1.1.1 Internal Systematics of the Subfamily Anophelinae pages 7-8 1.1.2 Internal Systematics of the Subfamily Culicinae pages 8-11 1.2 British Mosquitoes pages 12-20 1.2.1 Species List and Feeding Preferences pages 12-13 1.2.2 Distribution of British Mosquitoes pages 14-15 1.2.2.1 Distribution of the subfamily Culicinae in UK pages 14 1.2.2.2. Distribution of the genus Anopheles in UK pages 15 1.2.3 British Mosquito Species Complexes pages 15-20 1.2.3.1 The Anopheles maculipennis Species Complex pages
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Studies of Anopheles Atroparvus in Relation To
    [ 478 ] LABORATORY STUDIES OF ANOPHELES ATBOPARVUS IN RELATION TO MYXOMATOSIS BY C. H. ANDREWES, R. C. MUIRHEAD-THOMSON AND J. P. STEVENSON* National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, N.W.I and the Infesta- tion Control Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth, Surrey Though rabbit fleas (Spilopsyllus) are the principal vectors of myxomatosis in Britain (Armour & Thompson, 1955), Anopheles labranchiae atroparvus^ has been implicated in its transmission amongst domestic rabbits (Muirhead-Thomson, 1956). This mosquito was first shown to carry infection under laboratory condi- tions by Jacotot, Toumanoff, Vallee & Virat in France (1954). They found that in- fection was transmitted up to 21 days after the infective blood meal; that a single bite of the Anopheles was sufficient to produce infection and that a single mosquito could infect several rabbits one after the other at short intervals. These basic observations have been confirmed. In addition, it has been shown that infection can be produced by insertion of the mosquito's mouthparts alone, without actual feeding; that, after the first few days, virus is present only in the mouthparts of the insect; and that infected mosquitoes can remain infective for several months, much longer than is reported for this insect by the French workers or for other mosquitoes by Australian workers (Fenner, Day & Woodroofe, 1952). The possibility that myxoma virus multiplies in A. atroparvus will be discussed. METHODS We used both wild and laboratory-reared atroparvus, most frequently wild caught semi-hibernating insects. Rabbits used for feeding experiments were first anaes- thetized by intraperitoneal injection of nembutal.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread of the West Nile Virus Vector Culex Modestus and the Potential Malaria Vector Anopheles Hyrcanus in Central Europe
    Vol. 33, no. 2 Journal of Vector Ecology 269 Spread of the West Nile virus vector Culex modestus and the potential malaria vector Anopheles hyrcanus in central Europe Jan Votýpka1,2, Veronika Šeblová1, and Jana Rádrová1 1 Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12844 Prague, Czech Republic 2 Biology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Received 14 February 2008; Accepted 22 August 2008 ABSTRACT: Mosquito faunal studies were carried out in five separate wetland regions in the Czech Republic during 2004- 2007, sampling with dry ice-baited and sentinel host-baited CDC traps. A total of 79,245 adults was identified, representing 23 mosquito species that belonged to the genera Anopheles, Culiseta, Coquillettidia, Aedes, and Culex. Our findings reveal that the mosquito fauna is enriched by new elements in the Mediterranean region. Historical and CDC trap data suggest that the newly-emerging potential malaria vector, Anopheles hyrcanus, has reached the northern limit of its distribution in the Czech Republic, and the important West Nile virus (WNV) vector, Culex modestus, has widened its distribution in the Czech Republic. No significant differences were observed in a total number of mosquitoes collected by traps baited with either the sentinel animals or with CO2, although species abundance differed. A relativelyhigher proportion of Cx. modestus was collected in the sentinel-baited traps, while the proportion of Cx. pipiens was higher in the CO2-baited traps. Journal of Vector Ecology 33 (2): 269-277. 2008. Keyword Index: Mosquitoes, WNV, Czech Republic, climate change. INTRODUCTION al. 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Metacommunities and Biodiversity Patterns in Mediterranean Temporary Ponds: the Role of Pond Size, Network Connectivity and Dispersal Mode
    METACOMMUNITIES AND BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS IN MEDITERRANEAN TEMPORARY PONDS: THE ROLE OF POND SIZE, NETWORK CONNECTIVITY AND DISPERSAL MODE Irene Tornero Pinilla Per citar o enllaçar aquest document: Para citar o enlazar este documento: Use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/670096 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.ca Aquesta obra està subjecta a una llicència Creative Commons Reconeixement- NoComercial Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence DOCTORAL THESIS Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode Irene Tornero Pinilla 2020 DOCTORAL THESIS Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode IRENE TORNERO PINILLA 2020 DOCTORAL PROGRAMME IN WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUPERVISED BY DR DANI BOIX MASAFRET DR STÉPHANIE GASCÓN GARCIA Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements to obtain the Degree of Doctor at the University of Girona Dr Dani Boix Masafret and Dr Stéphanie Gascón Garcia, from the University of Girona, DECLARE: That the thesis entitled Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode submitted by Irene Tornero Pinilla to obtain a doctoral degree has been completed under our supervision. In witness thereof, we hereby sign this document. Dr Dani Boix Masafret Dr Stéphanie Gascón Garcia Girona, 22nd November 2019 A mi familia Caminante, son tus huellas el camino y nada más; Caminante, no hay camino, se hace camino al andar.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diptera: Culicidae) in Fianl›Urfa Province, Turkey
    TurkJZool 30(2006)383-392 ©TÜB‹TAK SeasonalFrequencyandRelativeDensityofLarvalPopulationsof MosquitoSpecies(Diptera:Culicidae)infianl›urfaProvince,Turkey* FatihMehmetfi‹MfiEK AdnanMenderesUniversity,FacultyofArtsandScience,DepartmentofBiology,EcologySection,09010Ayd›n-TURKEY Received:27.09.2005 Abstract: ThisresearchwasconductedbetweenJune2000andAugust2002in2regionsoffianl›urfa:one(IR)wheretherewas substantialirrigatedagricultureduetotheSoutheasternAnatoliaProjectandanother(MR)whereahighnumberofmalariacase s weredeterminedeveryyear.Tenspecies,namely Anopheles(Anopheles)claviger Meigen,1804,An.(Anopheles)sacharovi Favre, 1903,An.(Cellia)superpictus Grassi,1899, Culex(Neoculex) martinii Medschid,1930, Cx.(Culex)pipiens Linnaeus,1758, Cx. (Neoculex)territans Walker,1856, Cx.(Culex)theileri Theobald,1903, Culiseta(Allotheobaldia)longiareolata Macquart,1938, Ochlerotatus(Ochlerotatus)caspius Pallas,1771andUranotaenia(Pseudoficalbia)unguiculata Edwards,1903,wererecordedinthis study,andseasonalfrequenciesandrelativedensitiesoflarvalpopulationsweredeterminedseparatelyforeachregion.Based on thefrequencies,relativedensitiesandvectorialsignificanceofspeciesfoundinthisstudy,Culexpipiens,Cx.theileri andOchlerotatus caspius inIRandAnophelesclaviger,An.sacharovi,andAn.superpictus inMRwereofhighersignificance. KeyWords: Mosquitoes,larvalpopulation,frequency,relativedensity,malaria,fianl›urfa fianl›urfa‹li'ndeSivrisinekTürlerinin(Diptera:Culicidae) LarvaPopulasyonlar›n›nMevsimselS›kl›¤›veNisbiYo¤unlu¤u Özet: Buaraflt›rma,fianl›urfa‹li'nin,Güneydo¤uAnadoluProjesikapsam›ndasulutar›muygulamalar›n›nyap›ld›¤›bölgesi(IR)ileher
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of Alaska
    LIBRAR Y ■JRD FEBE- Î961 THE U. s. DtPÁ¡<,,>^iMl OF AGidCÜLl-yí MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U < The purpose of this handbook is to present information on the biology, distribu- tion, identification, and control of the species of mosquitoes known to occur in Alaska. Much of this information has been published in short papers in various journals and is not readily available to those who need a comprehensive treatise on this subject ; some of the material has not been published before. The information l)r()UKlit together here will serve as a guide for individuals and communities that have an interest and responsibility in mosquito problems in Alaska. In addition, the military services will have considerable use for this publication at their various installations in Alaska. CuUseta alaskaensis, one of the large "snow mosquitoes" that overwinter as adults and emerge from hiber- nation while much of the winter snow is on the ground. In some localities this species is suJBBciently abundant to cause serious annoy- ance. THE MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA By C. M. GJULLIN, R. I. SAILER, ALAN STONE, and B. V. TRAVIS Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued January 1961 For «ale by the Superintendent of Document«. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 45 cent» Contents Page Page History of mosquito abundance Biology—Continued and control 1 Oviposition 25 Mosquito literature 3 Hibernation 25 Economic losses 4 Surveys of the mosquito problem. 25 Mosquito-control organizations 5 Mosquito surveys 25 Life history 5 Engineering surveys 29 Eggs_".
    [Show full text]