DOCSLIB.ORG

Analýza Povstalectví V Kamerunu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analýza Povstalectví V Kamerunu MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA Fakulta sociálních studií Katedra politologie Analýza povstalectví v Kamerunu Bakalářská práce Michaela Kouřilová Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Josef Kraus Ph.D. UČO: 455871 Obor: Bezpečnostní a strategická studia Imatrikulační ročník: 2017/2018 Brno, 2020 Bibliografický záznam Autor: Michaela Kouřilová Fakulta sociálních studii, Masarykova univerzita Katedra politologie Název práce: Analýza povstalectví v Kamerunu Studijní program: Bezpečnostní a strategická studia Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Josef Kraus Ph.D. Akademicky rok: 2019/2020 Počet stran: 64 Klíčová slova: Kamerun, Ambazonia, povstalectví, secese, ozbrojený konflikt Bibliografic record Author: Michaela Kouřilová Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University Department of Political Science Title of Thesis: Analysis of the Insurgency in Cameroon Degree Programme: Security and strategic studies Supervisor: Mgr. Josef Kraus Ph.D. Academic Year: 2019/2020 Number of Pages: 64 Keywords: Cameroon, Ambazonia, insurgency, secession, armed conflict Anotace Předložená bakalářská práce se zabývá secesionistickým konfliktem v Kamerunu započatým v roce 2017. S využitím konceptuálního rámce Setha G. Jonese si klade za cíl představení konfliktu v celé jeho šíři, a to skrze analýzu jeho příčin, charakteristik povstaleckých skupin i proti-povstalecké strategie kamerunské vlády. Klíčová slova Kamerun, Ambazonia, povstalectví, secese, ozbrojený konflikt Abstract This bachelor thesis focuses on the secessionist conflict in Cameroon, which started in 2017. Using the conceptual framework of Seth G. Jones, it aims to present the conflict in its entirety, through an analysis of its causes, characteristics of insurgent groups and counter-insurgent strategy of the Cameroonian government. Key words Cameroon, Ambazonia, insurgency, secession, armed conflict Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem tuto bakalářskou práci na téma „Analýza povstalectví v Kamerunu“ vypracovala samostatně a pouze s použitím v práci uvedených zdrojů. V Brně, dne 31. 8. 2020 ……………………………………… Michaela Kouřilová Poděkování Na tomto místě bych ráda poděkovala vedoucímu bakalářské práce Mgr. Josefu Krausovi Ph.D. za velmi cenné rady a vždy rychlou a věcnou zpětnou vazbu. SEZNAM ZKRATEK ACT Ambazonia Coalition Team ADC Ambazonia Defence Council ADF Ambazonia Defence Forces AGovC Ambazonia Governing Council APLM African People´s Liberation Movement ARCC Ambazonia Recognition Collaborative Council ASDC Ambazonia Self-Defence Council BEPC Brevet d´Etudes du Premier Cycle BIR Rapid Intervention Battalion CACSC Cameroon Anglophone Civil Society Consortium CAM Cameroon Anglophone Movement CDC Cameroon Development Corporation CISAC Center for International Security and Cooperation EU Evropská Unie GCE General Certificate of Education HRW Human Rights Watch ICG International Crisis Group IG Interim Government of Ambazonia IPOB Indigenous People of Biafra MASSOB Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra OSN Organizace spojencýh národů SCACUF Southern Cameroons Ambazonia Consortium United Front SCBC Southern Cameroons Broadcasting Corporation SCLC Southern Cameroons Liberation Council SCNC Southern Cameroons National Council SOCADEF Southern Cameroons Defence Forces UNESCO Organizace OSN pro vzdělání, vědu a kulturu UNICEF Dětský fond Organizace spojených národů UNPO Organizace nezastoupených států a národů USA Spojené státy americké OBSAH 1) Úvod .........................................................................................................................................1 2) Metodologie .............................................................................................................................3 3) Konceptualizace ......................................................................................................................4 3.1. Insurgency .................................................................................................................................4 3.2. Separatismus, secesionismus, iredentismus ..............................................................................5 3.3. Analytický rámec povstalectví ..................................................................................................6 4) Faktory přispívající ke vzniku povstání ............................................................................ 11 4.1. Polarizace společnosti ............................................................................................................ 11 4.2. Socioekonomické faktory ...................................................................................................... 13 4.3. Přítomnost přírodních a jiných zdrojů ................................................................................... 14 4.4. Slabé vládnutí ........................................................................................................................ 15 5) Myšlenka secese v anglofonním odboji a počátek tzv. anglofonní krize ......................... 18 6) Povstalecké skupiny ............................................................................................................. 21 6.1. Organizační struktura ............................................................................................................. 21 6.1.1. Skupiny .................................................................................................................................. 21 6.1.2. Vzájemné vztahy mezi skupinami ......................................................................................... 25 6.2. Strategie a taktika .................................................................................................................. 26 6.3. Informační kampaň a propaganda .......................................................................................... 31 6.4. Vnější podpora ....................................................................................................................... 33 7) Protipovstalecká strategie ................................................................................................... 35 7.1. Strategie a taktika .................................................................................................................. 35 7.2. Informační kampaň a propaganda .......................................................................................... 39 7.3. Vnější podpora ....................................................................................................................... 41 8) Závěr ..................................................................................................................................... 42 Celkový počet znaků: 99 9041 1 Povolený rozsah práce byl překročen se souhlasem vedoucího práce. 1) Úvod Kamerun, země ležící v oblasti rovníkové Afriky na pobřeží Guinejského zálivu, čelí v současnosti řadě politických a bezpečnostních výzev. Nejenže v tomto státě panuje napětí mezi opozičními stranami a prezidentem vládnoucím již 38 let, v rámci jeho nejsevernějšího regionu přetrvává ohrožení ze strany nigerijské skupiny Boko Haram a bezpečné nejsou ani jeho hranice se Středoafrickou republikou. Hlavní hrozbu pro samotnou existenci státu však představuje již čtyři roky trvající ozbrojený konflikt mezi kamerunskou vládou a povstaleckými skupinami, které se snaží o odtržení dvou anglofonních regionů země a vytvoření nezávislého státu s názvem Ambazonia. Tento konflikt si dosud vyžádal přes 3000 obětí a zapříčinil vážnou humanitární krizi v rámci anglofonní části země, kdy jsou na vnější pomoci závislé více jak 2 miliony obyvatel (OCHA, 2020: 18), 679 000 anglofonních Kameruňanů má status vnitřně vysídlené osoby (UNHRC, 2020) a 52 000 kamerunských uprchlíků je registrováno v sousední Nigérii (OCHA, 2020: 12) Nestabilita Kamerunu, který hraje stěžejní roli při zajišťování bezpečnosti Guinejského zálivu a představuje klíčovou transportní zemi pro sousední státy ve vnitrozemí, může mít velice negativní dopad na již tak závažnou situaci celého regionu (ICG, 2010a: 1). Boj na dvou frontách oslabuje kamerunské ozbrojené složky, jež jsou zásadním spojencem Nigérie a USA při potlačení Boko Haram, a příliv uprchlíků do příhraničních regionů sousedních zemí narušuje jejich vnitřní bezpečnost. Tato bakalářská práce v následujícím textu analyzuje kamerunský secesionistický konflikt, jenž se svými závažnými důsledky představuje velmi relevantní a aktuální téma, které doposud nebylo v českém prostředí podrobněji zpracováno. Pro účely analýzy je využit konceptuální rámec Setha G. Jonese, jehož aplikací na vybranou případovou studii bude dosaženo výzkumných cílů, mezi něž patří 1) identifikace faktorů vedoucí ke vzniku konfliktu; 2) nalezení znaků vykazovaných povstaleckými skupinami; a také 3) znaků vykazovaných proti-povstaleckou strategií. V teoretické části dochází k osvětlení metodologie, která je v práci použita; konceptualizaci stěžejních pojmů, a sice anglického termínu insurgency a vymezení zásadních rozdílů mezi separatismem, secesionismem a iredentismem; a představení analytického rámce. V praktické části práce je poté využit zmíněný analytický přístup, 1 kdy se první kapitola zabývá příčinami konfliktu souvisejícími s problematikou polarizace kamerunské společnosti, mimo jiné v kulturních liniích, špatnou socio- ekonomickou situací secesionistického regionu, přítomnosti celé řady vzácných surovin či slabými institucemi v rámci státu jako celku. Následující část práce stručně pojednává o separatistických a secesionistických požadavcích anglofonního odboje, příčinách
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CPIN Template 2018
    Country Policy and Information Note Cameroon: Anglophones Version 1.0 March 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartography of the War in Southern Cameroons Ambazonia 
    Failed Decolonization of Africa and the Rise of New States: Cartography of the War in Southern Cameroons Ambazonia Roland Ngwatung Afungang* pp. 53-75 Introduction From the 1870s to the 1900s, many European countries invaded Africa and colonized almost the entire continent except Liberia and Ethiopia. African kingdoms at the time fought deadly battles with the imperialists but failed to stop them. The invaders went on and occupied Africa, an occupation that lasted up to the 1980s. After World War II, the United Nations (UN) resolution 1514 of 14 December 1960 (UN Resolution 1415 (1960), accessed on 13 Feb. 2019) obliged the colonial powers to grant independence to colonized peoples and between 1957 and 1970, over 90 percent of African countries got independence. However, decolonization was not complete as some colonial powers refused to adhere to all the provisions of the above UN resolution. For example, the Portuguese refused to grant independence to its African colonies (e.g. Angola and Mozambique). The French on their part granted conditional independence to their colonies by maintaining significant ties and control through the France-Afrique accord (an agreement signed between France and its colonies in Africa). The France-Afrique accord led to the creation of the Franc CFA, a currency produced and managed by the French treasury and used by fourteen African countries (African Business, 2012). CFA is the acronym for “Communauté Financière Africaine” which in English stands for “African Financial Community”. Other colonial powers violated the resolution by granting independence to their colonies under a merger agreement. This was the case of former British Southern Cameroons and Republic of Cameroon, South Sudan and Republic of Sudan, Eritrea and Ethiopia, Senegal and Gambia (Senegambia Confederation, 1982-1989).
    [Show full text]
  • CPIN Template 2018
    Country Policy and Information Note Cameroon: North-West/South-West crisis Version 2.0 December 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive)/Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMEROUN La Crise Anglophone : Situation Sécuritaire
    COMMISSARIAT GÉNÉRAL AUX RÉFUGIÉS ET AUX APATRIDES COI Focus CAMEROUN La crise anglophone : situation sécuritaire 1er octobre 2019 (mise à jour) Cedoca Langue de l’original : français DISCLAIMER: Ce document COI a été rédigé par le Centre de documentation et de This COI-product has been written by Cedoca, the Documentation and recherches (Cedoca) du CGRA en vue de fournir des informations pour le Research Department of the CGRS, and it provides information for the traitement des demandes individuelles de protection internationale. Il ne processing of individual applications for international protection. The traduit aucune politique ni n’exprime aucune opinion et ne prétend pas document does not contain policy guidelines or opinions and does not pass apporter de réponse définitive quant à la valeur d’une demande de protection judgment on the merits of the application for international protection. It follows internationale. Il a été rédigé conformément aux lignes directrices de l’Union the Common EU Guidelines for processing country of origin information (April européenne pour le traitement de l’information sur le pays d’origine (avril 2008) et il a été rédigé conformément aux dispositions légales en vigueur. 2008) and is written in accordance with the statutory legal provisions. Ce document a été élaboré sur la base d’un large éventail d’informations The author has based the text on a wide range of public information selected publiques soigneusement sélectionnées dans un souci permanent de with care and with a permanent concern for crosschecking sources. Even recoupement des sources. L’auteur s’est efforcé de traiter la totalité des though the document tries to cover all the relevant aspects of the subject, the aspects pertinents du sujet mais les analyses proposées ne visent pas text is not necessarily exhaustive.
    [Show full text]
  • Kamerun: Anglophone Separatist Innen
    Kamerun: Anglophone Separatist_innen Themenpapier der SFH-Länderanalyse Bern, 5. Juli 2021 Impressum Herausgeberin Schweizerische Flüchtlingshilfe (SFH) Postfach, 3001 Bern Tel. 031 370 75 75 Fax 031 370 75 00 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.fluechtlingshilfe.ch Spendenkonto: PC 30-1085-7 Sprachversionen deutsch COPYRIGHT © 2021 Schweizerische Flüchtlingshilfe (SFH), Bern Kopieren und Abdruck unter Quellenangabe erlaubt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Konflikt in den anglophonen Regionen ....................................................................4 1.1 Intensivierung des Konfliktes ..................................................................................4 1.2 Eskalation der Gewalt und hunderttausende Vertriebene ........................................6 1.3 Schwierige Informationslage ..................................................................................6 2 Ambazonia Governing Council und Ambazonia Interim Government ........................7 2.1 Bewaffnete separatistische Gruppierungen .............................................................8 3 Vorgehen der kamerunischen Behörden gegen mutmassliche anglophone Separatist_innen .................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Wahllose Gewalt gegen Zivilbevölkerung .............................................................. 13 4 Landesweite Verfolgung mutmasslicher Separatist_innen ..................................... 14 5 Rückkehrgefährdung von anglophonen Personen, die sich exilpolitisch
    [Show full text]
  • Kamerun Utvikling I Anglofon-Konflikten Juli 2018–Desember 2019
    Temanotat Kamerun Utvikling i anglofon-konflikten juli 2018–desember 2019 27. januar 2020 © Landinfo 2020 Materialet i denne publikasjonen er omfattet av åndsverklovens bestemmelser. Uten særskilt avtale med Landinfo er enhver eksemplarfremstilling og tilgjengeliggjøring bare tillatt i den utstrekning det er hjemlet i lov. Alle henvendelser om Landinfos rapporter kan rettes til: Landinfo Utlendingsforvaltningens fagenhet for landinformasjon Storgata 33 A Postboks 2098 Vika 0125 Oslo Tel: 23 30 94 70 E-post: [email protected] www.landinfo.no Om Landinfos temanotater Utlendingsforvaltningens fagenhet for landinformasjon (Landinfo) innhenter og analyserer informasjon om samfunnsforhold og menneskerettigheter i land som Utlendingsdirektoratet (UDI), Utlendingsnemnda (UNE) og Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet har behov for kunnskap om. Landinfos temanotater er basert på opplysninger fra nøye utvalgte kilder. Opplysningene er behandlet i henhold til anerkjente kvalitetskriterier for landinformasjon og Landinfos retningslinjer for kilde- og informasjonsanalyse. Temanotatene bygger på både skriftlig og muntlig kildemateriale. En del av informasjonen som formidles, er innhentet gjennom samtaler med kilder på informasjonsinnhentingsreiser. Landinfo tilstreber bredde i kildetilfanget, og så langt mulig er det innhentet informasjon fra kilder som arbeider uavhengig av hverandre. Alt benyttet kildemateriale er fortløpende referert i temanotatene. Hensyn til enkelte kilders ønske om anonymitet er ivaretatt. Notatene gir ikke et uttømmende bilde av temaene som undersøkes, men belyser problemstillinger som er relevante for UDIs og UNEs behandling av utlendingssaker. Landinfo er en faglig uavhengig enhet, og informasjonen som presenteres, kan ikke tas til inntekt for et bestemt syn på hva praksis bør være i utlendingsforvaltningens behandling av søknader. Landinfos temanotater gir heller ikke uttrykk for norske myndigheters syn på de forhold og land som omtales.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon's Anglophone Crisis
    Cameroon’s Anglophone Crisis: How to Get to Talks? Africa Report N°272 | 2 May 2019 Translation from French Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. The State of Play in the Anglophone Regions .................................................................. 2 A. The Security Situation ............................................................................................... 2 B. The Humanitarian, Social and Economic Impact ..................................................... 3 III. Positions of the Parties I: The Government on the Defensive ........................................ 6 A. Intransigence as a Rule .............................................................................................. 6 B. Disagreements within the Governing Class ............................................................... 7 C. Sham Concessions ..................................................................................................... 8 IV. Positions of the Parties II: The Anglophone Actors ......................................................... 10 A. The Separatists in a Strong Position in the Anglophone
    [Show full text]
  • Disarmament and International Security Committee
    Disarmament and International Security Committee BACKGROUND GUIDE Vancouver Model United Nations The Twentieth Annual Session | January 29–31, 2021 Dear Delegates, William Tsai Secretary-General My name is Emily Ni, and it is my utmost pleasure to welcome you to the Disarmament and International Security Committee at Vancouver Model United Nations 2021. Five years ago, I stumbled into the esoteric world of Model UN with the intent of seeking Vivian Gu academic enrichment. Twenty conferences later, at the end of this long journey, I can Director-General confidently say that the impact that Model UN has had on my life extends far beyond any intellectual benefit. Now, I can only hope to instill the same passion in you, the delegate, Derek Wu as my directors did for me. Cherish the memories you make as a delegate, and learn today Chief of Staff so that you may lead tomorrow. Tyler Rosenzweig Composing the rest of your Dais are Leo Li, Michelle Zhai, and David Xia. Leo is a senior Director of Logistics at Steveston-London Secondary, Michelle is a senior at York House School, and David is a sophomore at St George’s School. Together, we look forward to welcoming you virtually come January! Joyce Chen VMUN prides itself on its high level of educational discourse and professionalism. In the USG General Assemblies Disarmament and International Security Committee, delegates should come prepared with a comprehensive understanding of their committee’s mandate, the topic at hand, and Ethan Jasny their country’s foreign policy. These topics require thorough research and knowledge to USG Specialized Agencies allow for constructive debate; your work as a delegate will not only benefit yourself, but the committee as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon's Anglophone Crisis: How to Get to Talks?
    Cameroon’s Anglophone Crisis: How to Get to Talks? $IULFD5HSRUW1_0D\ 7UDQVODWLRQIURP)UHQFK +HDGTXDUWHUV ,QWHUQDWLRQDO&ULVLV*URXS $YHQXH/RXLVH %UXVVHOV%HOJLXP 7HO )D[ EUXVVHOV#FULVLVJURXSRUJ Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. The State of Play in the Anglophone Regions .................................................................. 2 A. The Security Situation ............................................................................................... 2 B. The Humanitarian, Social and Economic Impact ..................................................... 3 III. Positions of the Parties I: The Government on the Defensive ........................................ 6 A. Intransigence as a Rule .............................................................................................. 6 B. Disagreements within the Governing Class ............................................................... 7 C. Sham Concessions ..................................................................................................... 8 IV. Positions of the Parties II: The Anglophone Actors ......................................................... 10 A. The Separatists in a Strong Position in the Anglophone Movement ........................ 10 B. Federalists at the Crossroads
    [Show full text]
  • Country Policy and Information Note Cameroon: North-West/South-West Crisis
    Country Policy and Information Note Cameroon: North-West/South-West crisis Version 2.0 December 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive)/Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules x The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]