The American Veterans Committee's Challenge to the American Legion in Th
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ABSTRACT Title of Document: A DAVID AGAINST GOLIATH: THE AMERICAN VETERANS COMMITTEE‘S CHALLENGE TO THE AMERICAN LEGION IN THE 1950s Peter D. Hoefer, Ph.D. 2010 Directed By: Professor James B. Gilbert, Department of History This study joins a nascent body of scholarship that seeks to enrich and complicate understanding of 1950s political culture. While this newer scholarship acknowledges conservative dominance, it has also uncovered considerable evidence that the period was far more politically diverse and contested. This study demonstrates that there was no single, unitary conservative Americanism or patriotism in the fifties decade. Instead, the American Veterans Committee, despite suffering heavy membership losses after purging the Communist Party from its ranks in the late 1940s, survived, regrouped and persistently challenged the hegemonic conservative American Legion, (the nation‘s largest veterans‘ organization) throughout the 1950s. Using a liberal version of what I term Cold War Americanism, the AVC attempted to defend and advance the New Deal legacy. The Legion, however, using a conservative version of anti-Communist discourse, joined with its counterparts in the postwar Right to oppose the interventionist liberal state. I explore the role of these contending languages in shaping 1950s political culture by analyzing how these two groups used Cold War Americanism to advance their respective interest concerning two of the period‘s most important domestic issues: the restriction on civil liberties, and the developing struggle for African-American civil rights. This study demonstrates that within the community of organized veterans, the American Legion was not the only voice heard in the 1950s. Any account of this period that fails to acknowledge the presence of the AVC would be incomplete and inaccurate. A DAVID AGAINST GOLIATH: THE AMERICAN VETERANS COMMITTEE‘S CHALLENGE TO THE AMERICAN LEGION IN THE 1950s By Peter D. Hoefer Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2010 Advisory Committee: Professor James B. Gilbert, Chair Professor David Freund Professor Joseph A. McCartin Professor Keith W. Olson Professor David B. Sicilia © Copyright by Peter D. Hoefer 2010 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2: The Legion and Civil Liberties ................................................................. 18 Chapter 3: ―We do not need vigilante tactics that violate the spirit of true Americanism:‖ The American Veterans Committee and the Fight for Civil Liberties. ..................................................................................................................................... 66 Chapter 4: The AVC and the Fight for Civil Rights ................................................. 107 Chapter 5: The American Legion, Civil Rights, and the Limits of Cold War Brotherhood .............................................................................................................. 151 Chapter 6: ―May the Spirit of Our Boys Who Fell in Battle Live Forever‖: The American Legion and Massive Resistance. .............................................................. 179 Chapter 7: ―All good Legionnaires know that a bullet has no racial or religious discrimination.‖ The Society of the 40 & 8 Controversy and the Limits of Racial Reform in the American Legion ............................................................................... 215 Chapter 8: Conclusion.............................................................................................. 243 Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 248 ii Chapter 1: Introduction Speaking to the Chicago Accident and Health Association on May 17, 1950, American Legion national commander George N. Craig leveled a blistering attack on the State Department, declaring that it ―reeks with deceit, depravity and double talk.‖ The next day, as the New York Times reported, Michael Straight, national chairman of the American Veterans Committee (AVC) publicly denounced the speech as a ―defense‖ of Sen. Joseph McCarthy. As Straight charged, ―the Legion has used the same pack of lies and malicious gossip as is contained in McCarthy‘s original charges against the State Department.‖ Further, Straight declared, ―AVC is shocked that an organization which claims to be patriotic is joining this un-American attempt to undermine the faith of the American people in their government. At this critical time in the struggle against Soviet communism the bipartisan foreign policy as expressed by the State Department should be vigorously supported by all patriotic organizations.‖ As Straight concluded, the speech constituted ―another boost for Joe Stalin.‖ Undeterred by the AVC, the Legion continued its attacks on the State Department. At their October 1950 national convention Legionnaires passed a resolution that denounced Secretary of State Dean Acheson and ―the presence in the Department of State itself of men well known to possess Communist leanings and tendencies or perhaps even Communist party membership… [for] the failure of the State Department to deal adequately with the grim and bloody advance of communism throughout the world.‖1 1 New York Times, May 18, 1950, 13; AVC Bulletin, May, 1950, 2. For the Legion‘s 1950 convention resolution see: New York Times, October 13, 1950, 13. The national conventions in 1951 and 1952 1 Far more than a disagreement over charges of Communist influence in the State Department informed the actions of these two organizations. As this study argues, the use of anti-Communist rhetoric in this episode reflected two distinct and competing political agendas concerning the legitimacy of the postwar New Deal. Founded in 1919 during the height of the WWI Red Scare to lobby for federal aid to veterans and to combat domestic ―Bolshevism,‖ the Legion emerged in the interwar decades as one of the nation‘s premier anti-Communist organizations.2 Yet beginning in the late 1940s, and continuing throughout the 1950s, the Legion played a significant role in the efforts of the postwar Right to halt the postwar New Deal. As did other conservative individuals and organizations,3 the Legion sought to discredit liberal reform by associating its vast enlargement of centralized federal authority over domestic affairs with Soviet Communism. From its conservative perspective, the Legion viewed the postwar liberal welfare state as an unwarranted encroachment upon individual liberty, the system of unregulated free enterprise, and state‘s rights. These elements informed a conservative Americanism critical of the New Deal as passed similar resolutions against the State Department. The 1951 national convention called for ―the immediate removal of the present corps of [State Department] leaders‖ for their ―incompetence, indecision and defeatism,‖ and, ―the removal from office in that department, and all other government departments, of any and all persons who are not in full sympathy with our opposition to communism.‖ As convention delegates declared, ―They must be replaced and the State Department reconstituted with men of unquestioned loyalty.‖ Report of the Committee on Foreign Relations, in Proceedings of the 31st National Convention of the American Legion, Miami, FL, October 15-18, 1951, published as House Document No. 313, 82nd Congress, 2nd Session 84-85, 88. The 1952 Legion convention condemned State Department leaders for their ―outright refusal to act‖ effectively against ―the dangers of communism.‖ It also called for the administration to remove Acheson from his position. New York Times, August 28, 1952, 1. 2 William Pencak, For God & Country: The American Legion, 1919-1941 (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1989), xii, 14. 3 On the conservative anti-New Deal backlash, see Robert Griffith, The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1987), 30-31. 2 ―communistic‖ since the late 1930s4, and as the Cold War intensified, they were reasserted in a resurgent postwar nationalist and anti-Communist discourse I term Cold War Americanism. Throughout the 1950s, the Legion regularly drew upon this political language to depict the New Deal domestic reform agenda as detrimental to American national security interests. In these representations, the Legion depicted liberal reform and its allies as ―alien,‖ ―un-American,‖ ―disloyal,‖ and ―communistic.‖ Conversely, the group represented the values and practices of self- reliant individualism, laissez-faire free enterprise and state supremacy over local affairs as the embodiments of ―true‖ Americanism that were indispensable to United States success in the Cold War. The AVC on the other hand primarily used anti-Communist rhetoric as a language of reform to counter conservative opposition to the New Deal. Formed in 1944 by reform-minded WWII veterans as an alternative to the Legion, the AVC advanced a liberal version of Cold War Americanism discourse that embraced the power of the interventionist state as a positive development, and promoted its expansion to ensure that the nation lived up to its core ideals of democracy and equality