LDA Report Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LDA Report Template Denny St Francis New Settlement, Waterbeach A10 Transport Corridor Constraints Studies July 2012 A 17 Minster Precincts Peterborough PE1 1XX United Kingdom T +44 (0) 1733 310 471 F +44 (0) 1733 553 661 W www.lda-design.co.uk LDA Design Consulting LLP Registered No: OC307725 17 Minster Precincts, Peterborough PE1 1XX 3321_constraints July 2012 Denny St Francis New Settlement, Waterbeach Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Appraisals ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1. Landscape and visual ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Heritage ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.3. Ecology .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Appendices..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Appendix 1. Capita Symonds drawings identifying study zones ........................... 1 Appendix 2. Drawing 3321_603_A Landscape Notes ................................................ 2 Appendix 3. Cultural Heritage Appraisal of the A10 Transport Options ........... 3 Appendix 4. Ecological Appraisal of the A10 Transport Corridor ......................... 4 Appendix 5. Drawing 3321_604_A Summary of Principal Landscape, Heritage, and Ecology Constraints ....................................................................................... 5 Version: 1.3 Version date: 18 September 2012 Comment Final This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with ISO 9001:2000. 3321_constraints July 2012 Denny St Francis New Settlement, Waterbeach 1.0 Introduction This report brings together work addressing the key potential landscape, heritage and ecology constraints that may influence the design of new transport routes between the proposed new settlement at Denny St Francis, Waterbeach and the A14 Cambridge Bypass. Two proposals are under consideration: Realignment of the A10 between the proposed new settlement at Denny St Francis and the A14 Creation of a guided busway between the proposed new settlement at Denny St Francis and the A14 The study area comprises the zones shown on the following two plans provided by Capita Symonds (see Appendix 1): Drawing number CS 00182/T/009 Waterbeach New Settlement Limit of Deviation A. (This relates to the A10 road realignment.) Figure 2 Proposed busway corridor The studies have been carried out at a high level using desk based research and brief site visits, viewing the land from publicly accessible locations. Further research and detailed survey will be needed as the project develops. The results of the three studies are presented in separate appendices: Appendix 2 - Landscape notes Appendix 3 - Cultural Heritage Appraisal of the A10 Transport Options Corridor Appendix 4 - Ecological Appraisal of the A10 Transport Corridor This report summarises the main potential constraints identified by each study in order to inform the selection of preferred routes. The perceived level of constraint is defined as follows: High – Avoid. Likely to be a significant constraint. Medium – Avoid if possible. Low – Potential constraint but likely to be resolvable. The main constraints from the three studies are summarised in sections 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 below, and on drawing 3321_604_A in Appendix 5. 3321_constraints 1 July 2012 Denny St Francis New Settlement, Waterbeach 2.0 Appraisals 2.1. Landscape and visual Landscape and visual assessments of three proposed A10 upgrade route options were undertaken by LDA Design in 2005, summarising landscape character, heritage, conservation and visual constraints. Landscape notes based on GIS data, Tree Preservation Order (TPO) information provided by South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) and a site visit in 2012 are given on drawing number 3321_603_A in Appendix 2. The plan also identifies some potential constraints that do not strictly relate to landscape or visual issues, including land uses such as a cemetery, allotments and a golf course. The main constraint to development is the Green Belt which extends from Waterbeach to the A14. Section 9 of the National Policy Planning Framework (NPPF) sets out the Government's policy on Green Belts. This superseded Planning Policy Guidance 2: Green Belts (1995) (PPG2) but the fundamental aim and five purposes of Green Belts set out in PPG2 remain unchanged. The NPPF states that: ‘The fundamental aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open; the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and their permanence.’ The road and guided busway have potential to affect the openness of the Green Belt. It is not possible for the routes to avoid the Green Belt and it is considered to be a Medium level constraint. Other constraints include: Many dwellings, which are shown on drawing 3321_604_A which should be avoided if possible. They are identified as being a Medium level constraint if they are directly physically affected. Effects on residential amenity due to changes to views would be addressed in a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, although this is considered to be a Low level constraint. Public footpaths running between Waterbeach and the A10. If directly affected, measures would be required to divert or maintain access along these paths. Effects on views from the paths would be addressed in a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. This is considered to be a Low level constraint. The cemetery pr0vides a constraint to be avoided if possible (Medium level constraint). If it is to be directly affected research would be required to identify how to mitigate effects or move the cemetery. The village of Landbeach is a discrete settlement set within arable farmland and effects on its setting should be considered as part of development proposals. This is considered to be a Low level of constraint. SCDC has confirmed that there are two TPOs within the study area (C/11/17/58/1 at Manor House, Waterbeach Road and SC/3/76 at Cambridge Road, Waterbeach). Although these have been identified as Low level constraints they should be avoided if possible. Other landscape / visual constraints are considered to be Low level. 3321_constraints 2 July 2012 Denny St Francis New Settlement, Waterbeach 2.2. Heritage The heritage study undertaken by Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd is provided in Appendix 3. The main potential constraints identified in the report and summarised on drawing 3321_604_A are: Three Milestones on the A10 (Listed Grade II) - Level of Constraint: High Landbeach Conservation Area, Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monument - Level of Constraint: Medium to low (depending on route) Waterbeach Conservation Area - Level of Constraint: Low Car Dyke - Level of constraint: Low 2.3. Ecology The ecology study undertaken by LDA Design is provided in Appendix 4. The main potential constraint identified in the report and summarised on drawing 3321_604_A is: Cambridge Road Willow Pollards County Wildlife Site - Level of Constraint: Medium The report identifies the potential for protected species within the study area including European Protected Species (EPS) and the need for further surveys. The presence and location of protected species would need to be identified by further survey. Protected species are considered to be Low level constraints because they can be readily be dealt with by design, subject to issues such as land availability if re-location or alternative habitat is required. EPS are also considered to be Low level constraints in this context as it is considered that solutions to address impacts are likely to be readily determined, but EPS will require a greater input into mitigation design than other protected species. 3321_constraints 3 July 2012 Denny St Francis New Settlement, Waterbeach 3.0 Conclusion None of the landscape, heritage and ecology constraints identified are ‘show stoppers’ to realignment of the A10 and creation of a guided busway between the proposed new settlement at Denny St Francis and the A14. This work can be used to help identify preferred routes, taking into account the constraints identified. Further more detailed survey and analysis work will be needed as the design progresses, to help inform detailed design and mitigation proposals. 3321_constraints 4 July 2012 Denny St Francis Appendices Appendix 1. Capita Symonds drawings identifying study zones Drawing number CS 00182/T/009 Waterbeach New Settlement Limit of Deviation A Figure 2 Proposed busway corridor 3321_constraints 1 July 2012 Denny St Francis Appendix 2. Drawing 3321_603_A Landscape Notes 3321_constraints 2 LEGEND The Site Area encompassing potential A10 transport infrastructure options Area of flooded former mineral workings Additional land controlled by RLW Estates enclosed by vegetation
Recommended publications
  • Highway Verge Management
    HIGHWAY VERGE MANAGEMEN T Planning and Development Note Date 23rd January 2019 Version Number 2 Highway Verge Management Review Date 30th March 2024 Author Geoff Sinclair/Richard Edmonds Highway Verge Management PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT NOTE INTRODUCTION Planning and Development Notes (PDN) aim to review and collate the City Corporation’s (CoL) property management issues for key activities, alongside other management considerations, to give an overview of current practice and outline longer term plans. The information gathered in each report will be used by the CoL to prioritise work and spending, in order to ensure firstly that the COL’s legal obligations are met, and secondly that resources are used in an efficient manner. The PDNs have been developed based on the current resource allocation to each activity. An important part of each PDN is the identification of any potential enhancement projects that require additional support. The information gathered in each report will be used by CoL to prioritise spending as part of the development of the 2019-29 Management Strategy and 2019-2022 Business Plan for Epping Forest. Each PDN will aim to follow the same structure, outlined below though sometimes not all sections will be relevant: Background – a brief description of the activity being covered; Existing Management Program – A summary of the nature and scale of the activity covered; Property Management Issues – a list of identified operational and health and safety risk management issues for the activity; Management Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • The Praetorium of Edmund Artis: a Summary of Excavations and Surveys of the Palatial Roman Structure at Castor, Cambridgeshire 1828–2010 by STEPHEN G
    Britannia 42 (2011), 23–112 doi:10.1017/S0068113X11000614 The Praetorium of Edmund Artis: A Summary of Excavations and Surveys of the Palatial Roman Structure at Castor, Cambridgeshire 1828–2010 By STEPHEN G. UPEX With contributions by ADRIAN CHALLANDS, JACKIE HALL, RALPH JACKSON, DAVID PEACOCK and FELICITY C. WILD ABSTRACT Antiquarian and modern excavations at Castor, Cambs., have been taking place since the seventeenth century. The site, which lies under the modern village, has been variously described as a Roman villa, a guild centre and a palace, while Edmund Artis working in the 1820s termed it the ‘Praetorium’. The Roman buildings covered an area of 3.77 ha (9.4 acres) and appear to have had two main phases, the latter of which formed a single unified structure some 130 by 90 m. This article attempts to draw together all of the previous work at the site and provide a comprehensive plan, a set of suggested dates, and options on how the remains could be interpreted. INTRODUCTION his article provides a summary of various excavations and surveys of a large group of Roman buildings found beneath Castor village, Cambs. (centred on TL 124 984). The village of Castor T lies 8 km to the west of Peterborough (FIG. 1) and rises on a slope above the first terrace gravel soils of the River Nene to the south. The underlying geology is mixed, with the lower part of the village (8 m AOD) sitting on both terrace gravel and Lower Lincolnshire limestone, while further up the valley side the Upper Estuarine Series and Blisworth Limestone are encountered, with a capping of Blisworth Clay at the top of the slope (23 m AOD).1 The slope of the ground on which the Roman buildings have been arranged has not been emphasised enough or even mentioned in earlier accounts of the site.2 The current evidence suggests that substantial Roman terracing and the construction of revetment or retaining walls was required to consolidate the underlying geology.
    [Show full text]
  • Footpath & Cycleway Asset Management Plan
    SHIRE OF ESPERANCE Footpath & Cycleway Asset Management Plan Footpaths_Plan_2010_V3_Final - ii - Document Control Document ID: 59_07_070909_nams.plus_amp template v11 Rev No Date Revision Details Author Reviewer Approver V1 August 2010 1st Draft BP SAM Group V2 January 2011 Revised Register Data and text BP SAM Group V3 February 2011 Text update for Final BP © Copyright 2007 – All rights reserved. The Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia. - iii - TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................................................................................. iv GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................................................................................ v 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 What the Shire Provides ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 What does it Cost? ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Plans for the Future ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Operation for Conservation of Rural Road Verges
    OCCASIONAL REPORTS No. 2 -OPERATION FOR CONSERVATION OF RURAL ROAD VERGES Co-operation between County Highway Departments and Conservation Organisations on the management of rural road verges and conservation of Sites of Special Interest A report based on information obtained from County Council Highway Departments, The County Naturalists' Trusts, Regional Officers of the Nature Conservancy Council, and the Biological Records Centre, up to May 1974 MONKS WOOD EXPERIMENTAL STATION The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (Natural Environment Research Council) Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon. INDEX Chapter I Introduction Chapter 11 Nature Conrervancy Southvert Ragion 1. Corwall 2. Devon 3. Dorret 4. Gloucerterrhire 5. Smerret Chapter I11 Nature Conservancy South Region 17 6. Berkrhire 7. Buckinghamrhire 8. Pmprhire 9. Inla of Wight 10. Oxfordrhire 11. Wiltrhire Chapter IV Nature Conrervancy Southeart Region 37 12. Hertfordrhire 13. Kent 14. Surrey 15. Eart Surrex 16. Wert Surra Chapter V Nature Conrervmcy Midland Region Cherhire Derbyrhire Herefordahire Leicer terrhire Northamptonahire Nottinghamrhire Rutland Shroprhire Staffordahire Warwickrhire Worcerterrhire Chapter VI Nature Conrervancy Eart Anglia Region Bedfordrhire Cambridge and Isle of Ely Errex Huntingdon and Plterborough Lincolnrhire - Holland Ker teven Lindrey Norfolk Ear t Suffolk Wert Suffolk Chapter VII Nature Conservancy North Region Cumber1 and 110 Durham 112 Lancashire 116 Northumberland 118 Wertmorland 120 Yorkrhire - East Riding 122 North Riding 1Z4 West Riding 126 Chapter VIII Nature Conrervancy North Wale8 Region 46. Anglesey 47. Caemrvonshire 48. Denbighshire 49. Flintshire 50. Merionethrhire 51. Hontgomeryshire Chapter IX Nature Conservancy South Wales Region 52. Brecknockshire 53. Cardiganahire 54. Camarthenshire 55. Glamorgan 56. Monmouthrhire 57. Pembrokerhire 58. Rndmrshire Chapter X Scotland Chapter XI Analysis of plant rpecier mentioned 153 Acknowledgements Bibliography Appendix A 169 Appendix B 179 Explanation of layout of lirtr of rite8 of Conservation Inside Importance in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2018
    Living Villages WANSFORD COMMUNITY HALL Peterborough Road, Wansford This hall accommodates parties of up to 36 people seated. Ideal for Meetings, Workshops, Aerobics etc GREAT VALUE AT ONLY £4 per hour FOR BOOKINGS TELEPHONE John Stannage 07879 485330 S K CONTRACTS Award Winning Builders & Carpenters Winner LABC 2009 Awards Family run business offering high quality workmanship and customer satisfaction with over 33 years of experience. • New House Builds • Commercial Conversions • Domestic Extensions • Loft Conversions • Stone Property Renovations • On Site Joinery • Orangeries • Conservatories 6 Old North Road, Wansford, Peterborough PE8 6LB Tel: 07970 700767 [email protected] www.skbuildersandcarpenters.co.uk 2 EDITORIAL CONTENTS Contacts 4 I’m delighted to be able to inform all our readers Worship Lists 5 and advertisers that Gordon Alleyne is joining Reflections 7 the LV Editorial Team as the Treasurer. If you NEWS REPORTS: need to contact him, his details are on the next Friends of churches: page. Through this column I welcome him to this Water Newton 8 volunteer run publication, delivered free to 750 Wansford and homes. More than 50% of the publication is Thornhaugh 9 dedicated to local churches, clubs and societies, we cover village events and have regular articles St John the Baptist 8 on local history and nature. We evolved from a Stibbington Centre 13 church/parish magazine in the 1960’s (or earlier) Communicare 14 Hort Society 15 to where we are today and we look forward to WI 29 being able to continue in the future with the wonderful support of our advertisers, sponsors, PARISH COUNCILS: distributors and contributors Thornhaugh 24/25 Wansford 26 Once again as I was starting to put this edition together accidents on major roads around our SPECIAL FEATURES: Community Carol villages caused severe disruption to the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 Marholm Village and Buildings
    Chapter 16 Marholm Village and Buildings History of the Village Marholm village lies approximately four miles West of Peterborough and one mile from the seat of the Fitzwilliam family at Milton Hall. The parish covers some fourteen hundred acres, with the village positioned roughly in the centre. Today it remains a peaceful, largely agricultural community of some two hundred people. Although during the past fifty years the domination of agriculture has diminished, the village retains a rural feel, and in many ways is unchanged from its earlier history, despite the modern development, and proximity to a burgeoning city. To a large extent, this tranquillity has been preserved by the protection derived from Milton Estate, which has retained ownership of much of the property in the village. In addition, the Estate has curtailed further encroachment from the city beyond Mucklands Wood to the East, which delineates the border of Milton’s sales, in the 1960s, of land to the Peterborough Development Corporation for the expansion of the city. The name of the village most probably derives from ‘mere’, meaning pool, and ‘ham’, or settlement, and may refer to the pools by the Manor House. During the Middle Ages, the name was alternatively Marham, Marreham, Marrenham, Mareham, Morham and Marhome. By the 18th century it was commonly referred to as Marham and later known by the present spelling, Marholm [1]. Early History The early history of the village is obscure, with few known archaeological sites. Not surprisingly, however, in view of its proximity to the flourishing Roman settlement in Castor, there is some evidence of their presence in the area now embraced by Marholm.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough Heritage Open Days
    7TH – 10TH SEPTEMBER 2017 PETERBOROUGH HERITAGE OPEN DAYS incredible venues in and around Peterborough for you to explore, FREE Find out more information at: www.peterboroughcivicsociety.org.uk/heritage-open-days.php PETERBOROUGH HERITAGE OPEN DAYS PETERBOROUGH HERITAGE OPEN DAYS PETERBOROUGH CATHEDRAL, MINSTER PRECINCTS, PETERBOROUGH, PE1 1XS Explore Hidden Spaces… We’re opening up some of our buildings for you to explore, with guides on hand to answer any questions. These are open 11am – 4pm on Saturday 9 September, 12noon – 3pm on Sunday 10 September. Cathedral Library Almoner’s Hall Tucked away above the Cathedral’s 14th century Explore the medieval Almonry and find out porch is our remarkable and unseen library! about the role the abbey played in caring for the (Please note: access via spiral staircase). poor of Peterborough. Knights’ Chamber Inside the Cathedral’s Visitor Centre is the 13th century Knights’ Chamber, a recently restored medieval hall. Medieval costumed guides will be on hand to chat to visitors. Special Guided Tour - Cathedral Taster Tours Table Hall and the Infirmary Find out about the people, events and stories CELEBRATE Discover the remains of the Abbey’s Hospital, that are connected to the Cathedral, a centre including a rare chance to go inside the 15th for Christian worship for over 1300 years with century Table Hall. Tour lasts just over an hour one of our expert tour guides. HERITAGE OPEN DAYS and places are limited (pre-booking strongly Tours last about 45 minutes, meet inside the advised); meet at the Cathedral’s main entrance. Cathedral’s main entrance. Heritage Open Days celebrate England’s fantastic architecture and culture Tours at 11.30am and 2pm on Saturday 9 September, Tours at 11.30am and 2pm on Saturday 9 September by offering free access to properties that are usually closed to the public or 2pm on Sunday 10 September.
    [Show full text]
  • Malton Political Associations
    Political connections Malton has been associated with national politics since its origin. It returned 2 MPs to Parliament from 1640-1832, and one from 1833-1885. The MPs’ identities reflected not only local but national power relationships throughout this period. Eustace Fitzjohn delivered the castles of Alnwick and Malton to the army of David, king of Scotland who was fighting in support of the claim of Maud, his niece, to the crown held by King Stephen. The Scots garrison at Malton castle was removed by an army of northern nobles under the direction of Archbishop Thurstan of York, who then burned the town in retribution for its affiliation during this, the first English civil war, some would say. Eustace Fitzjohn returned from temporary exile in Scotland to begin rebuilding and fortifying the town and its castle site. Whilst not overtly involved in national politics, the Eures were important regional players, being Lords of various Marches, and several of the male line died in battle – at Towton during the wars of the roses; at Ancram Moor, the culmination of a Eure-led military rampage across southern Scotland which had included the burning and sacking of Edinburgh and Melrose; at Marston Moor, fighting for the Royalist cause, during the English Civil War. Sir William Eure was born 1485 and knighted ‘beneath the banner’ at Tournay in 1513. He was the Sheriff of County Durham 1519-23, of Northumberland, 1526-27 and Lieutenant of the Middle Marches after 1522. By 1538, he was Captain of the town and castle of Berwick and Warden of the East Marches and was a member of the Council of the North after 1540.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfords Point Road Upgrade, Brushwood Drive to the Georges River Submissions Report
    Alfords Point Road Upgrade Brushwood Drive to the Georges River Submissions report JUNE 2013 RMS 13.341 ISBN 978-1-922245-57-1 Roads and Maritime Services Alfords Point Road upgrade, Brushwood Drive to the Georges River Submissions Report June 2013 This Report has been prepared by GHD for Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and may only be used and relied on by RMS for the purpose agreed between GHD and RMS as set out in Section 1.1 of this Report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than RMS arising in connection with this Report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those specifically detailed in the Report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the Report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the Report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this Report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. Roads and Maritime Services - Alfords Point Road upgrade, Brushwood Drive to the Georges River, 21/21268 | i Executive summary NSW Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is proposing to upgrade about 2.1 kilometres of Alfords Point Road between Brushwood Drive and the Georges River at Alfords Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices
    Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices Sydney 2020 Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices Edition 3.0 prepared by: David Green and Kenneth Lewis Publisher Austroads Ltd. Edition 3.0 project manager: Richard Delplace Level 9, 287 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Abstract Phone: +61 2 8265 3300 The Austroads Guide to Traffic Management consists of 13 parts and [email protected] provides comprehensive coverage of traffic management guidance for www.austroads.com.au practitioners involved in traffic engineering, road design, town planning and road safety. About Austroads Part 10: Transport Control – Types of Devices is concerned with the tools that Austroads is the peak organisation of Australasian are required for traffic management and traffic control within a network. It road transport and traffic agencies. covers the various control devices used to regulate and guide traffic, including signs, traffic signals, pavement markings, delineators, and traffic islands. Austroads’ purpose is to support our member Other devices and technologies that convey information and guidance to road organisations to deliver an improved Australasian users while they are active in traffic are also included. road transport network. To succeed in this task, we undertake leading-edge road and transport Part 10 provides guidance on the design and use of particular traffic control research which underpins our input to policy devices that are applied to achieve or implement traffic management and development and published guidance on the control measures. It provides advice on the functions, suitability and correct design, construction and management of the road use of devices to create a more efficient and safer road traffic environment for network and its associated infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Fabian Summer Walk – Some Background Notes
    Fabian Summer Walk – Some Background Notes Alwalton – Some history Traces of early man have been found. In Roman times a building of some kind evidently existed at Alwalton, and various coins and pieces of pottery, etc., have been found. King Edred granted the land at Alwalton in 955 to his thegn Aelfsige Hunlafing. It was afterwards given to the Abbey of Peterborough, which held Alwalton at the time of the Conquest. Alwalton was listed in the Domesday Book [1086] as “Alwoltune”. It records that there were 20 households with a population between 70 and 100. In the 2011 census the population was 317. Alwalton used to be in the administrative county of Huntingdonshire until 1965. Apparently locals are still fiercely loyal to the old county – or at least identify with it as a shire district, rather than Cambridgeshire. References Archive images – Alwalton British History Online – Alwalton British History Online – Parishes, Alwalton Welcome to Peterborough – Alwalton Wikipedia: Alwalton Wikipedia: Huntingdonshire Alwalton Marble Alwalton marble is known to have been used from the 12th century until 1875**. It was used in the cathedrals at Lincoln, Peterborough, Bury St Edmunds and Ely, and in Southwell Minster, as well as many parish churches, such as Barnack. The quarry site has been identified as the Alwalton Lynch escarpment on the banks of the River Nene (which provided a convenient way of transporting the stone). (** though one source indicated that quarrying continued into the 1920's) References Virtual Microscope – Limestone – Alwalton Marble Alwalton Lynch Escarpment Marble Quarry An Alwalton Marble Capital Cambridgeshire Geological Society – Nene Valley Historic England – Alwalton Limestone Quarries Nene Living – Finding our Marble! Virtual Microscope – Limestone – Alwalton Marble Alwalton Hall The red brick wing dates back to the 1780's.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Management of Roadside Native Vegetation and Regrowth Vegetation 2
    Guidelines for the Management of Roadside Native Vegetation and Regrowth Vegetation Under Native Vegetation Regulation 11(23) Native Vegetation Council Endorsed 3 July 2019 (amended September 2020) Disclaimer While every reasonable effort has been made to verify the information in these guidelines, use of the information contained is at your sole risk. The Department for Environment and Water recommends that you independently verify the information before taking any action. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All other rights are reserved. © Crown in right of the State of South Australia. Published 2019. Guidelines for the Management of Roadside Native Vegetation and Regrowth Vegetation 2 Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 What are the ‘Guidelines for the Management of Roadside Native Vegetation and Regrowth Vegetation’? ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Importance of protecting native vegetation ................................................................................................................ 5 Alternatives to clearing
    [Show full text]