Application of Geosynthetics for Ground Improvement: An Overview

IGC 2009, Guntur, INDIA

APPLICATION OF GEOSYNTHETICS FOR GROUND IMPROVEMENT: AN OVERVIEW

Gohil D.P. Research Scholar, Department of Applied Mechanics, S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat–395007, India. E-mail : [email protected] C.H. Solanki Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Mechanics, S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat–395007, India. E-mail : [email protected] A.K. Desai Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Mechanics, S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat–395007, India. E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT: Geosynthetics is manmade material used for reinforcement. Soil transfers the built up forces in earth to reinforcement by which develops tension in reinforcement. Geosynthetics is used in locations where shear stresses are generated because shearing stress between soil and reinforcement restrains the lateral deformation of the soil. Geosynthetics used for increasing and permeability of soil, reducing settlement of soil. Under dynamic shear excitations, slip deformations occur along smooth geosynthetic interfaces. Thus, in a application seismically induced slip deformations along a bottom geosynthetic liner can result in reduced accelerations transmitted to landfill waste. Preliminary shaking table test on smooth high density and showed that this concept of using geosynthetics to isolate a structure from incoming seismic waves had great promise. Shaking table tests of a building model placed on a selected geosynthetic liner results the benefits of utilizing a special geosynthetics liner as an energy absorbing system that can reduce building response during an . Displacement transducers are use to measure the slip along the geotextile interface and to measure the distortion of the columns of the building model. This paper presents a review of the existing experimental and analytical work done in this field and identifies different areas needing further attention. Key Words: Geosynthetics, High Density Polyethylene, Seismic Waves, Displacement Transducers.

1. INTRODUCTION soil–geosynthetic interface and the development of tensile stresses within the reinforcing layers. Internal stability also are the largest and most diverse group of requires that the geosynthetic layers provide tensile geosynthetic materials and include all fabrics produced from anchorage against potential slope failures by extending into polymer fibers. There are five main functions of geosynthetic the stable soil mass. materials: to separate dissimilar geomaterials; to reinforce soil masses; to act as a filter in controlling the of The principal parameters in design are the tensile strength solid particles within the soil; to provide drainage pathways and stiffness of the geosynthetic, and the soil–geosynthetic within the soil mass; or to impede fluid flow by acting as a interface shear and bond resistance. Horizontal layers of containment/flow barrier. Geosynthetic functions of geosynthetics are also used as basal reinforcements for embankments constructed over soft . Basal separation, filtration, and reinforcement involve interactions reinforcement provides additional short-term stability and with the surrounding soil. greatly aids constructability in these situations. Tensile stresses develop due to membrane action in the centre of the 2. APPLICATION OF GEOSYNTHETICS basal reinforcement due to undrained deformations of the soil. These stresses transfer through interface shear tractions Geotextiles and are widely used to reinforce soil into both the overlying fill and underlying soft masses in the design of retaining walls and slopes. In these soil improving coherence in the side slopes and redistributing Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) applications, horizontal the forces transferred to the underlying . layers of the geosynthetics are sandwiched between compacted layers of fill during construction. Lateral The use of geotextiles to separate the soil sub from the spreading of the soil mass is resisted by shearing along the overlying aggregate (unpaved) base or railway ballast

439 Application of Geosynthetics for Ground Improvement: An Overview rely on tensile stiffness and strength properties of the attention. Many experimental, numerical, and analytical geosynthetics. The geotextile allows drainage but prevents studies have been performed to investigate the behaviour of intrusion of aggregate into a softer underlying material while Reinforced Soil Foundation (RSF) for different soil types. preventing the pumping of fine particles from the sub grade The selection or development of a proper geosynthetic into the ballast. Geotextiles are frequently used as filter material for use as foundation isolation was the first fabrics in subsurface drainage and important task of the research. Several candidate interface applications. Geosynthetic materials are routinely used for materials were explored for their suitability as foundation subsurface drainage; these include edge/fin drains behind isolator. Ideally, foundation isolation material should satisfy earth retaining walls and prefabricated vertical drains used to requirements including: accelerate the consolidation of low permeability clays. • The friction coefficient during sliding should be small to 3. IMPROVEMENT OF SOIL DUE TO minimize the acceleration transmitted through the GEOSYNTHETICS interface. In general, friction coefficients between 0.05 and 0.15 would be desirable for the isolation concept to Ling & Liu (2001) showed that geosynthetic reinforcement be used worldwide not only in regions of high increased the stiffness and bearing capacity of the asphalt seismicity, but also where pose a moderate concrete pavement. Under dynamic loading, the life of the threat, and seismic mitigation measures can be cost asphalt concrete layer was prolonged in the presence of prohibitive. geosynthetic reinforcement. • The static friction coefficient should be slightly larger Sireesh (Article in press) showed that geocell mattress can than the dynamic coefficient to prevent sliding under substantially increase the bearing capacity and reduce non seismic loads including wind. settlement of the clay sub grade with void. The geocell • To simplify introduction of foundation isolation in mattress must spread beyond the void at least a distance engineering design, the friction coefficient should be equal to the diameter of the void. With increase in the height insensitive to several factors including sliding velocity, of the geocell layer, its moment of inertia and hence bending normal stress, sliding distance, moisture, and and shear rigidity of the geocell mattress increases that it effectively bridges the void and transmits the footing temperature. pressure to the adjacent soil mass. The overall bearing • The interface material should be resistant to chemical capacity of the foundation bed increases with increase in and biological attacks, and to long-term creep effects. density of the fill soil. It is therefore profitable to have a • The maximum and permanent slip displacements dense fill in the geocells. induced by an earthquake should be small enough to Ghazavi & Lavasan (2008) did a parametric study that allow functionality of the structure and its utilities. revealed the role of the distance between reinforcing layers and footings and the width and depth of reinforcing layers on 4.1 Behaviour of Geosynthetics under Cyclic Loading the bearing capacity. The results showed that the bearing capacity of interfering footing increases with the use of Unnikrishnan et. al. (2002) indicate that a thin layer of high- layers, depending on the distance between two strength provided on both sides of the reinforcement is footings. Reinforcement caused the bearing capacity of effective in improving the strength and deformation interfering footings to increase by about 1.5 and 2 for one behaviour of reinforced clay soils under both static and and two reinforcement layers. cyclic type loadings. Sharma et. al. (2009) showed that the bearing capacity of soil Yegian & Kadakal (2004) explained the use of improved when reinforced by geosynthetics and that better geosynthetics liners for dynamic response of landfill. Slip improvements were obtained when the reinforcement is deformations occurring along geosynthetic interface can placed within a certain depth (or influence depth) beyond limit the earthquake energy transmitted to overlying waste which no significant improvement will occur. or soil. Results from dynamic analysis demonstrated that Hajiani, et al. (2003) proved that the bearing capacity smooth HDPE / geotextile liners significantly increase with increasing number of reinforcement layers, if reduce the landfill acceleration, beyond an input base the reinforcements were placed within a range of effective acceleration of 0.2 g. A dynamic analysis assumed the depths. complete shear transfer through geosynthetic liners can significantly over estimate landfill acceleration. 4. DEVELOPMENT OF GEOSYNTHETIC FOR USE AS FOUNDATION ISOLATION 4.2. Geosynthetic Liners for Foundation Isolation During the past 30 years, the use of reinforced soils to The suitability of various synthetic materials for the purpose support shallow foundations has received considerable of foundation isolation. The dynamic interface properties of

440 Application of Geosynthetics for Ground Improvement: An Overview these materials are being investigated using a shaking table building model. Tests were carried out by varying the normal to identify the most promising material for this application. contact stress, amplitude of displacement (slip) and the rate of slip. Under these different test conditions, the friction Now-a-days geotechnical engineers have interested in coefficients of the interfaces were measured and evaluated. research program that was focused on exploring the technical feasibility of using synthetic materials as an alternative low- cost seismic isolation technique. A base isolator provides a discontinuity between a footing and the overlying column. A base isolator performs two functions: (1) It shifts the natural period of the building away from that of the earthquake. (2) It provides additional damping to absorb the energy. Hushmand & Martin (1991); Kavazanjian et al. (1991); and Yegian & Lahlaf (1992) proposed the concept of using a smooth geosynthetic liner underneath building foundations to dissipate earthquake energy through sliding along the geosynthetic interface, thus transmitting reduced accelerations to the overlying structure. The research Fig. 2: Building Model on Shaking Table Experiment program identified a synthetic liner that is suited for seismic isolation. Two alternate schemes were explored for the use of the liner. The first was the placement of the liner Using UHMWPE/geotextile liner, the column shear force in immediately underneath the foundation of a structure. This the building model placed on the geosynthetic liner to the approach is foundation isolation and is shown schematically column shear force in the model that was fixed to the table in Figure 1. were compared. The horizontal axis defines the peak accelerations to which the three earthquake records were scaled. The results show that at a base acceleration greater than 0.07g the geosynthetic liner absorbs energy, and thus dramatically reduces the column shear forces in the building model. For example, at a base acceleration of 0.4g, the column shear force in the building model on foundation isolation is only 35% of that corresponding to the fixed case. This demonstrates the excellent energy absorption capacity of UHMWPE/geotextile interface.

5. SUMMARY Fig. 1: Foundation Isolation Due to various functions and advantages geosynthetics are best option in geotechnical projects. New immerging field In the second approach, the synthetic liner is placed within for geosynthetics as foundation isolator to reduce seismic the soil profile at some depth below the foundation of a energy transmitted to buildings can be a very cost effective. structure. This approach is referred to as soil isolation. It is also a simpler alternative to earthquake hazard mitigation Yegian & Catan (2004), paper presents typical experimental measures conventionally used in current engineering test results, which support the selection of a synthetic liner practice. most suitable for seismic isolation. The details and results of shaking table experimental tests that were conducted using a REFERENCES rigid block as well as a model structure to investigate the performance of a foundation-isolated structure are presented. American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM] (2000). Analysis and discussions of the research results are presented “Standards on Geosynthetics”, 5th edn. ASTM, demonstrating the technical feasibility of using a synthetic Philadelphia, PA Giroud J-P 1993 Geosynthetics liner to dissipate earthquake energy, thus reducing structural Bibliography. International Fabrics Association, St. Paul, response and minimizing the potential for damage from an MN, Vols. 1, 2. earthquake. De, A. and Zimmie, T.F. (1997). “Factors Influencing Dynamic Frictional Behavior of Geosynthetic Interfaces”, Various tests including cyclic loading and rigid block Proc. IGS (International Geosynthetic Society) shaking table experiments are performed to evaluate the Geosynthetics’ 97, Long Beach, Calif., 837–849. dynamic response of various interfaces. Displacement transducers are use to measure the slip along the geotextile Deb K., Chandra S. & Basudhar P.K. (2005). “Settlement interface and to measure the distortion of the columns of the Response of a Multilayer Geosynthetic-reinforced

441 Application of Geosynthetics for Ground Improvement: An Overview

Granular Fill–soft Soil System.”, Geosynthetics Liming Hu and Jialiu Pu (2004). “Testing and Modelling of International, 12, No. 6. Soil-Structure Interface”, Journal of Geotechnical and Ghazavi Mahmoud & Lavasan Arash Alimardani (2008). Geoenvironmental Engineering © ASCE / August / 851. “Interference Effect of Shallow Foundations Constructed Ling Hoe I. & Liu Zheng. “Performance of Geosynthetic- on Sand Reinforced with Geosynthetics”, Geotextiles and Reinforced Asphalt Pavements” Journal of Geotechnical , Volume 26, Issue 5, pp. 404–415. and Geoenvironment Engineering Feb 2001 / 77. Hajiani Javad et.al. (2003). “Experimental and Numerical Luettich S.M., Giroud J.P. and Bachus R.C. (1992). Investigation of the Bearing Capacity of Model Circular “Geotextile filter Design Criteria”, Journal of Geotextiles and Ring Footings on Reinforced Sand,” Geotextiles and and Geomembranes, 11 (4), 19–34. Geomembranes, 21 241–256. Mahmoud Ghazavi and Arash Alimardani Lavasan (2008). Hushmand, B. and Martin, G.R. (1991). “Layered Soil- “Interference Effect of Shallow Foundations Constructed Synthetic Liner Base Isolation System”, Final Report, on Sand Reinforced with Geosynthetics”, Geotextiles and NSF Small Business Innovation Research Program. Geomembranes, Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 404–415. Hussain, S.M. (1994). “Performance of Base Isolated S. Sireesh (Article in Press) “Bearing Capacity of Circular Buildings in the Northridge Earthquake”, Proc. Seismic Footing on Geocell–sand Mattress Overlying Clay Bed Base Isolation: State of the Practice, SEAOSC Seminar, with Void”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes. CA. Sharma Radhey, Qiming Chen, Murad Abu-Farsakh and Ingold T.S. (1994). “Geotextiles and Geomembranes Sungmin Yoon (2009). “Analytical Modelling of Geogrid Manual”, Elsevier Advanced Technology, Oxford, UK. Reinforced Soil Foundation”, Geotextiles and Kadakal, U. (1999). “Geosynthetics in Earthquake Hazard Geomembranes, Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 63–72. Mitigation”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Northeastern University, Skinner, R.I., (1993). An introduction to seismic isolation, Boston. Wiley, New York. Kavazanjian, E., Hushmand, B. and Martin, G. (1991). Unnikrishnan N., Rajagopal K. and Krishnaswamy N.R. “Frictional Base Isolation Using Layered Soil- (2002). “Behaviour of Reinforced Clay under Monotonic geosynthetic Liner System”, Proc., ASCE, 3rd U.S. Conf. and Cyclic Loading”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, on Lifeline , Los Angeles, 1140– Volume 20, April Issue 2, Pages 117–133. 1151. Yegian, M.K. and Catan, M. (2004). “Soil Isolation for Kelly, J.M. (1997). “Earthquake-resistant Design with Seismic Protection Using a Smooth Synthetic Liner”, J. Rubber”, 2nd Ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.,130(11), 1131–1139. Kodikara Jayantha (2000). “Analysis of Tension Yegian M.K. & Kadakal U. “Foundation Isolation for Development in Geomembranes Placed on Landfill Seismic Protection Using a Smooth Synthetic Liner”, Slopes”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 18 47–61 Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Koerner R.M. (1998). Designing with Geosynthetics, 4th engineering © ASCE / November 2004 / 1121–1130. edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ Yegian, M.K. and Lahlaf, A. M. (1992a). “Dynamic Krystyna Kazimierowicz-Frankowska (2007). “Influence of Interface Shear Properties of Geomembranes and Geosynthetic Reinforcement on the Load-settlement Geotextiles”, J. Geotech. Eng., 118(5), 760–779. Characteristics of Two-layer Sub Grade”, Geotextiles and Yegian, M.K. and Lahlaf, A.M. (1992b). “Geomembranes as Geomembranes, 25 366–376. Baseisolation”, Geosynthetic Fabric Rep., September. Lahlaf, A.M. (1991). “Dynamic Interface Zimmie, T.F., De, A. and Mahmud, M.B. (1994). Properties between Geomembranes and Geotextiles”, “Centrifuge Modelling to Study Dynamic Friction at Ph.D. Thesis, Department of , Geosynthetic Interfaces”, Proc. Fifth International Northeastern University. Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Lawson C.R. (1990). “Geosynthetics. In: Holloway EL Products, Singapore, pp. 415–418. Polymers and Polymer Composites in Construction”, Telford, London, Chap. 10.

442