Preliminary Spectral Analysis of Furcraea Foetida

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Spectral Analysis of Furcraea Foetida © 2018 IJRAR December 2018, Volume 5, Issue 4 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) PRELIMINARY SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF FURCRAEA FOETIDA 1R. SITRARASI and 2M. RAZIA 1Research Scholar, 2Assistant Professor 1,2Department of Biotechnology, 1,2Mother Teresa Women’s University, Kodaikanal, India. Abstract: Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw. is a large monocot plant native to the Northern South America and Caribbean. The dried leaf and root powders of the plant were subjected to UV-Vis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy techniques to characterize the bioactive compounds. Both the spectroscopy techniques enable the preliminary identification of the chemical constituents and structures of compounds present in the plants. The UV-Vis spectrum of aqueous extracts of leaf and root showed different peaks ranging from 218- 269nm with high absorption. The FTIR spectrum of the root powder showed 13 peaks whereas only 7 peaks were found in the leaf powder. The FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of alcohols, phenols, alkanes, aldehydes, primary amines, saturated aliphatic and aromatic compounds in both the plant powders. Both the results help in analysing the phytochemistry of the plant and confirm the fact that this plant contains important bioactive constituents. Keywords: Furcraea foetida, FTIR, UV-Vis, spectroscopy, phytochemistry. 1. Introduction Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw. is a monocot plant belonging to the sub-family Agavoideae, family Asparagaceae and the order Asparagales (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III system, 2009)[1]. It is also commonly known as the giant cabuaya, Mauritius hemp, and green-aloe. This plant is native to the Northern South America and Caribbean. Many cultivars are used as ornamental plants in many parts of the world. The plant is cultivated in many countries for fibre extraction. F. foetida has been naturalised in many countries including India and are invasive species in countries like South Africa. The main objective of the present study is to identify the phytoconstituents of F. foetida by UV-Vis spectrum and FTIR profile. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Plant Collection About 6 months old Furcraea foetida plants were collected from Mannavanur, Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu. The leaves and roots of the plant were separated and cut into small pieces. They were washed thoroughly in tap water thrice to remove dirt and then were rinsed with distilled water. The roots and leaves of the plant were dried in a hot air oven at 45oC for 4 days. The dried samples were powdered using mechanical grinder. The resultant powder was sieved to remove fibers and was stored in air tight containers for further usage. 2.2. Preparation of extract For preparation of aqueous extract 0.10g of leaf and root powders were extracted in 20 ml of double distilled water in separate 50ml conical flasks. The flasks were shaken and then the solutions were boiled in a microwave oven for 45 seconds. The solutions were allowed to cool and then filtered using Whatman No.1 filter paper. 2.3. UV-Vis analysis The aqueous extracts of leaf and root were scanned in the wavelength ranging from 200-800 nm using Perkin Elmer Spectrophotometer and the characteristic peaks were recorded. IJRAR1944725 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 446 © 2018 IJRAR December 2018, Volume 5, Issue 4 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) 2.4. FTIR analysis FTIR analysis of leaf and root powders were carried out using Perkin Elmer FTIR spectroscope. Leaf and root powders were ground with KBr using a motor and pestle. The mixture was pressed to form translucent pellets which were used for spectral analysis. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. UV-VIS analysis The qualitative UV-VIS spectrum profile of leaf and root extracts of F.foetida are shown in Figs. 1 & 2. The UV-Vis spectrum of aqueous extracts of leaf and root showed different peaks ranging from 218- 269nm with high absorption (Tables 1 & 2). 5.915 6.523 2 3 6.000 3 4 2 6 7 5 4.000 4.000 Abs. Abs. 2.000 2.000 1 1 5 4 0.000 0.000 -0.304 -0.325 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 nm. nm. Fig. 1. UV-Vis spectrum of F.foetida leaf extract Fig. 2. UV-Vis spectrum of F.foetida root extract Table 1. UV-VIS spectrum peak values of F.foetida leaf extract S. No. Wavelength (nm) Absorbance 1 668.2 0.312 2 269.8 4.659 3 230.4 5.36 Table 2: UV-VIS spectrum peak values of F.foetida root extract S.No. Wavelength (nm) Absorbance 1 489.4 0.7 2 239.2 5.953 3 235 5.514 4 218.2 5.33 3.2. FTIR analysis The FTIR spectrum was used for the identification of the functional groups of the active components in plant samples based on the peak value in the region of infrared radiation. The crude powder of leaf and root of F. foetida gave the following characteristic absorption peaks as represented in Figs. 3 & 4. The functional groups and bonds for the respective frequencies are listed in Tables 3 & 4. The FTIR spectroscopy is proved to be a reliable and sensitive method for detection of biomolecular composition [2]. IJRAR1944725 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 447 © 2018 IJRAR December 2018, Volume 5, Issue 4 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 1734.18cm-1, 9.99%T 619.28cm-1, 10.15%T 9 %T 8 7 1414.80cm-1, 7.28%T 6 1072.43cm-1, 6.86%T 5 1634.97cm-1, 5.45%T 3902.56cm-1, 5.10%T 4 3749.19cm-1, 5.15%T 2922.14cm-1, 4.53%T 3 2 3421.21cm-1, 1.55%T 1 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500450 cm-1 Name Description FF LEAF Sample 048 By Administrator Date Thursday, March 02 2017 Fig. 3. FTIR spectrum of F. foetida leaf powder 16 14 12 10 8 618.74cm-1, 8.72%T %T 1734.80cm-1, 7.76%T 1515.87cm-1, 7.26%T 1378.61cm-1, 6.70%T 6 1259.56cm-1, 6.80%T 1415.89cm-1, 5.81%T 3806.09cm-1, 5.19%T 3868.53cm-1, 5.05%T 4 3750.95cm-1, 5.08%T 1105.96cm-1, 4.66%T 2851.34cm-1, 4.31%T 1635.98cm-1, 4.00%T 1058.32cm-1, 3.91%T 2920.42cm-1, 3.33%T 1035.95cm-1, 3.95%T 2 3422.64cm-1, 0.52%T 0 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500450 cm-1 Name Description FF ROOT Sample 049 By Administrator Date Thursday, March 02 2017 Fig. 4. FTIR spectrum of F. foetida root powder Table 3. FT-IR peak values and functional groups of F.foetida leaf powder S.No Frequency Bond Functional group 1 3421.21 O–H stretch, H–bonded Alcohols, phenols 2 2922.14 C–H stretch Alkanes 3 1734.18 C=O stretch Aldehydes, saturated aliphatic 4 1634.97 N–H bend 1° amines 5 1414.80 C–C stretch (in–ring) Aromatics 6 1072.43 C–N stretch Aliphatic amines 7 619.28 –C≡C–H: C–H bend/ C–Br stretch Alkynes/alkyl halides Table 4. FT-IR peak values and functional groups of F.foetida root powder S.No Frequency Bond Functional group 1 3422.64 O–H stretch, free hydroxyl/O–H Alcohols, phenols stretch, H–bonded 2 2920.42 C–H stretch Alkanes 3 2851.84 C–H stretch Alkanes 4 1734.80 C=O stretch Aldehydes, saturated aliphatic 5 1635.98 N–H bend 1° amines 6 1515.87 N–O asymmetric stretch Nitro compounds 7 1378.61 N-O stretch Nitro compounds 8 1415.89 C–C stretch (in–ring) Aromatics IJRAR1944725 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 448 © 2018 IJRAR December 2018, Volume 5, Issue 4 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) 9 1259.56 C–H wag (–CH 2 X) Alkyl halides 10 1105.96 C–N stretch Aliphatic amines 11 1058.32 C–N stretch Aliphatic amines 12 1035.95 C–N stretch Aliphatic amines 13 618.74 –C≡C–H: C–H bend/ C–Br stretch Alkynes/alkyl halides The UV-Vis spectroscopy is a simple technique to identify the main phytochemicals, discriminating between the hydrophilic and lipophilic molecules in relation to the polarity. Spectroscopic methods like UV- Vis and FTIR can be used together or separate in this sense as well as conventional methods [3]. An IR spectrum represents a fingerprint of a sample with absorption peaks which directly corresponds to the frequencies of vibrations between the bonds of the atoms which makes up the plant material [4-8]. It is because no two compounds produce the exact same infrared spectrum and thus are unique. Therefore, infrared spectroscopy can result in a positive identification of compounds. Also the size of the peaks in a spectrum is a directly proportional to the quantity of the compound [9]. 4. Conclusion Both the results help in analysing the phytochemistry of the plant and confirm the fact that this plant contains important bioactive constituents. In the present study UV-Vis spectrum and FTIR analysis showed the presence of alcohols, phenols, alkanes, aldehydes, primary amines, saturated aliphatic and aromatic compounds which are responsible for various medicinal properties of test plant. The plant can be further studied by isolating compounds with different therapeutic properties.
Recommended publications
  • Furcraea Foetida
    Furcraea foetida Mauritius hemp Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw. Syn. Agave foetida, Furcraea gigantea Family: Agavaceae Description: Long pointed leaves, to 8 ft long by 8 inches wide, light green, succulent, arranged densely around a short stem, a few widely spaced prickles on margins of most leaves, especially near the base. A some- what woody stalk emerges after several years and grows to about 40 ft; lateral branches, themselves usually branched, bear numerous pale yellow flowers along the branches, pendant, 1 inch in diameter, fragrant, 3 inner petals (tepals) positioned be- tween 3 outer ones. Fruits are capsules, cylindrical, contain- ing black seed. Many bulblets (bulbils) capable of developing into new plants are formed on inflorescence. Genus named for French chemist A.F. Fourcroy (d. 1809); foetida for the slightly unpleasant smell of the plant sap(70). Often confused with sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine), also a weed of arid areas. Both were introduced into Hawai‘i in attempts to start a cordage industry(59, 70). The in- florescences of sisal are upright at the end of the branches. Agave sisalana Distribution: Originally from South America, culti- vated for fiber, and thus widely naturalized. Occurs in dry, rocky areas. In Hawai‘i, naturalized on all islands except Niÿihau and Kahoÿolawe. First reported in Management: Tolerant of aqueous sprays of Hawai‘i in 1888(70). glyphosate, hexazinone, and triclopyr and to soil appli- cations of hexazinone. Sensitive to foliar sprays of 2,4- Environmental impact: Displaces other plants in D in diesel and very sensitive to foliar sprays of triclopyr drier forests and pastures.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Constituents from the Roots of Furcraea Bedinghausii Koch
    International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy Online: 2013-08-05 ISSN: 2299-3843, Vol. 16, pp 9-19 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.16.9 CC BY 4.0. Published by SciPress Ltd, Switzerland, 2013 Chemical Constituents from the Roots of Furcraea bedinghausii Koch Rémy B. Teponno1,*, Beaudelaire K. Ponou1,2, Dennis Fiorini2, Luciano Barboni2, Léon A. Tapondjou1 1Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, PO Box 183, Dschang, Cameroon 2School of Science and Technology, Chemistry Division, University of Camerino, Via S. Agostino 1, I-62032 Camerino, Italy *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Phytochemical investigation of the roots of Furcraea bedinghausii Koch. Led to the isolation of a mixture of two new homoisoflavones, 5,7-dihydroxy-3-(3,4-methylenedioxybenzyl)-chromone (4a) and 5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-methoxybenzyl)-chromone (4b), together with the known β-sitosterol (1), 7,4'-dihydroxyhomoisoflavane (2), dihydrobonducellin (3), kaempferol (5), 5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4- hydroxybenzyl)-chromone (6), 1-linoleylglycerol (7), 6’-linoleyl-3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-β-sitosterol (8), trans-3,3’,5,5’-tetrahydroxy-4’-methoxystilbene (9), yuccaol C (10), yuccaol D (11), 3-O-β-D- glucopyranosyl-β-sitosterol (12), 4-[6-O-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzoyl)-β-D- glucopyranosyloxy]-3-methoxybenzoic acid (13) and two pairs of steroidal saponins: (25R)-2α-3β– dihydroxy-5α-spirostan-12-one 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β- D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-galactopyranoside (14a) and (25R)-2α-3β–dihydroxy-5α-spirost-9-en- 12-one 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl- (1→4)- β-D-galactopyranoside (14b), (25R)-3β–hydroxy-5α-spirostan-12-one 3-O-β-D- glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D- galactopyranoside (15a) and (25R)-3β–hydroxy-5α-spirost-9-en-12-one 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl- (1→2)-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-galactopyranoside (15b).
    [Show full text]
  • Agave Americana and Furcraea Andina: Key Species to Andean Cultures in Ecuador
    Ethnobotany Agave americana and Furcraea andina: Key Species to Andean Cultures in Ecuador LUCÍA DE LA TORRE1*, IAN CUMMINS2, AND ELIOT LOGAN-HINES2 Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 246-266, 2018 Abstract Background: The rich Agaveae-based culture that exists in the Ecuadorian Andes is little known. Wild DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1813 and cultivated rosettes of Agave americana and Furcraea andina coexist in arid Andean landscapes. A. americana is considered an introduced species to Ecuador. Received: Questions: What are Agaveae use patterns and cultural importance in the Ecuadorian Andes? Is the ethno- December 19th, 2017 Accepted: botanical significance of Agave in Ecuador comparable to that in Mexico and other Andean countries? Agave americana, Furcraea andina March 12th, 2018 Species studied: Associated editor: Study site, dates: Ecuadorian Andes, 2016. Salvadro Arias Methods: Semi-structured interviews to Agaveae users (37) and a review of literature on ethnobotanical research conducted in Ecuador since the 18th century. Results: A. americana is more diversely and widely used than F. andina (124 vs 36 uses and 548 vs 140 use records, respectively). The versatility of A. americana lies in its mishki (sap extracted from its heart) which has multiple medicinal, edible and ceremonial applications. We found significant variation of its use patterns throughout the region. The main use of F. andina as a source of fiber is disappearing. Most productive initiatives involve A. americana (92 %, n = 53). Conclusion: The importance of A. americana in the Ecuadorian Andes is comparable to that of agaves in Mexico, but not to its importance in other Andean countries where it is used sporadically.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida1
    ENH854 Low-Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida1 Jody Haynes, John McLaughlin, Laura Vasquez, Adrian Hunsberger2 Introduction regular watering, pruning, or spraying—to remain healthy and to maintain an acceptable aesthetic This publication was developed in response to quality. A low-maintenance plant has low fertilizer requests from participants in the Florida Yards & requirements and few pest and disease problems. In Neighborhoods (FYN) program in Miami-Dade addition, low-maintenance plants suitable for south County for a list of recommended landscape plants Florida must also be adapted to—or at least suitable for south Florida. The resulting list includes tolerate—our poor, alkaline, sand- or limestone-based over 350 low-maintenance plants. The following soils. information is included for each species: common name, scientific name, maximum size, growth rate An additional criterion for the plants on this list (vines only), light preference, salt tolerance, and was that they are not listed as being invasive by the other useful characteristics. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC, 2001), or restricted by any federal, state, or local laws Criteria (Burks, 2000). Miami-Dade County does have restrictions for planting certain species within 500 This section will describe the criteria by which feet of native habitats they are known to invade plants were selected. It is important to note, first, that (Miami-Dade County, 2001); caution statements are even the most drought-tolerant plants require provided for these species. watering during the establishment period. Although this period varies among species and site conditions, Both native and non-native species are included some general rules for container-grown plants have herein, with native plants denoted by †.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Botanical Garden
    Vol. XV DECEMBER, 1914 No. 180 JOURNAL The New York Botanical Garden EDITOR ARLOW BURDETTE STOUT Director of the Laboratories CONTENTS PAGE Index to Volumes I-XV »33 PUBLISHED FOR THE GARDEN AT 41 NORTH QUBKN STRHBT, LANCASTER, PA. THI NEW ERA PRINTING COMPANY OFFICERS 1914 PRESIDENT—W. GILMAN THOMPSON „ „ _ i ANDREW CARNEGIE VICE PRESIDENTS J FRANCIS LYNDE STETSON TREASURER—JAMES A. SCRYMSER SECRETARY—N. L. BRITTON BOARD OF- MANAGERS 1. ELECTED MANAGERS Term expires January, 1915 N. L. BRITTON W. J. MATHESON ANDREW CARNEGIE W GILMAN THOMPSON LEWIS RUTHERFORD MORRIS Term expire January. 1916 THOMAS H. HUBBARD FRANCIS LYNDE STETSON GEORGE W. PERKINS MVLES TIERNEY LOUIS C. TIFFANY Term expire* January, 1917 EDWARD D. ADAMS JAMES A. SCRYMSER ROBERT W. DE FOREST HENRY W. DE FOREST J. P. MORGAN DANIEL GUGGENHEIM 2. EX-OFFICIO MANAGERS THE MAYOR OP THE CITY OF NEW YORK HON. JOHN PURROY MITCHEL THE PRESIDENT OP THE DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC PARES HON. GEORGE CABOT WARD 3. SCIENTIFIC DIRECTORS PROF. H. H. RUSBY. Chairman EUGENE P. BICKNELL PROF. WILLIAM J. GIES DR. NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER PROF. R. A. HARPER THOMAS W. CHURCHILL PROF. JAMES F. KEMP PROF. FREDERIC S. LEE GARDEN STAFF DR. N. L. BRITTON, Director-in-Chief (Development, Administration) DR. W. A. MURRILL, Assistant Director (Administration) DR. JOHN K. SMALL, Head Curator of the Museums (Flowering Plants) DR. P. A. RYDBERG, Curator (Flowering Plants) DR. MARSHALL A. HOWE, Curator (Flowerless Plants) DR. FRED J. SEAVER, Curator (Flowerless Plants) ROBERT S. WILLIAMS, Administrative Assistant PERCY WILSON, Associate Curator DR. FRANCIS W. PENNELL, Associate Curator GEORGE V.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary List of the Vascular Plants and Wildlife at the Village Of
    A Floristic Evaluation of the Natural Plant Communities and Grounds Occurring at The Key West Botanical Garden, Stock Island, Monroe County, Florida Steven W. Woodmansee [email protected] January 20, 2006 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Submitted to CarolAnn Sharkey Key West Botanical Garden 5210 College Road Key West, Florida 33040 and Kate Marks Heritage Preservation 1012 14th Street, NW, Suite 1200 Washington DC 20005 Introduction The Key West Botanical Garden (KWBG) is located at 5210 College Road on Stock Island, Monroe County, Florida. It is a 7.5 acre conservation area, owned by the City of Key West. The KWBG requested that The Institute for Regional Conservation (IRC) conduct a floristic evaluation of its natural areas and grounds and to provide recommendations. Study Design On August 9-10, 2005 an inventory of all vascular plants was conducted at the KWBG. All areas of the KWBG were visited, including the newly acquired property to the south. Special attention was paid toward the remnant natural habitats. A preliminary plant list was established. Plant taxonomy generally follows Wunderlin (1998) and Bailey et al. (1976). Results Five distinct habitats were recorded for the KWBG. Two of which are human altered and are artificial being classified as developed upland and modified wetland. In addition, three natural habitats are found at the KWBG. They are coastal berm (here termed buttonwood hammock), rockland hammock, and tidal swamp habitats. Developed and Modified Habitats Garden and Developed Upland Areas The developed upland portions include the maintained garden areas as well as the cleared parking areas, building edges, and paths.
    [Show full text]
  • UFFLORIDA IFAS Extension
    ENH854 UFFLORIDA IFAS Extension Low-Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida1 Jody Haynes, John McLaughlin, Laura Vasquez, Adrian Hunsberger2 Introduction The term "low-maintenance" refers to a plant that does not require frequent maintenance-such as This publication was developed in response to regular watering, pruning, or spraying-to remain requests from participants in the Florida Yards & healthy and to maintain an acceptable aesthetic Neighborhoods (FYN) program in Miami-Dade quality. A low-maintenance plant has low fertilizer County for a list of recommended landscape plants requirements and few pest and disease problems. In suitable for south Florida. The resulting list includes addition, low-maintenance plants suitable for south over 350 low-maintenance plants. The following Florida must also be adapted to--or at least information is included for each species: common tolerate-our poor, alkaline, sand- or limestone-based name, scientific name, maximum size, growth rate soils. (vines only), light preference, salt tolerance, and other useful characteristics. An additional criterion for the plants on this list was that they are not listed as being invasive by the Criteria Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC, 2001), or restricted by any federal, state, or local laws This section will describe the criteria by which (Burks, 2000). Miami-Dade County does have plants were selected. It is important to note, first, that restrictions for planting certain species within 500 even the most drought-tolerant plants require feet of native habitats they are known to invade watering during the establishment period. Although (Miami-Dade County, 2001); caution statements are this period varies among species and site conditions, provided for these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants to Avoid
    Plants to Avoid Do ot Plant These Plants! Images of many alien species available on the University of Hawaii Botany Department Website Check out the Hawaiian Ecosystems at Risk project (HEAR) for Alternatives to Invasives List Common ame Scientific ame Plant Family Jasminim fluminense Oleaceae Arthrostema ciliatum Melastomataceae Dissotis rotundifolia Melastomataceae Erigeron karvinskianus Asteraceae Eucalyptus robusta Myrtaceae Hedychium gardnerianum Singiberaceae Juncus planifolius Juncaceae Lospostemon confertus Myrtaceae Medinilla cumingii Melastomataceae Medinilla magnifica Melastomataceae Medinilla venosa Melastomataceae Medinilla candidum Melastomataceae Melinis minutiflora Poaceae Olea europaea Oxyspora paniculata Melastomataceae Panicum maximum Poaceae Paspalum urvillei Poaceae Passiflora edulis Passifloreae Phormium tenax Agavaceae Pinus taeda Pinaceae Prosopis pallida Favaceae Pterolepis glomerata Melastomataceae Rhodomyrtus tomentosa Myrtaceae Schefflera actinophylla Araliaceae Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Australian blackwood Acacia melanoxylon Mimosaceae Australian tree fern Cyathea cooperi Cyatheaceae Australian tree fern Sphaeropteris cooperi Cyatheaceae Beggar's tick, Spanish needle Bidens pilosa Asteraceae California grass Brachiaria mutica Poaceae Chinese banyan, Malayan banyan Ficus mirocarpa Moraceae Chinese violet Asystasia gangetica Acanthaceae Christmasberry, Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Anacardiaceae Formosan koa Acacia confusa Mimosaceae German ivy Senecio mikanioides Asteraceae Japanese honeysuckle
    [Show full text]
  • Brad.N39.2021.A23
    Additional species of Agave (Agavoideae/Agavaceae, Asparagaceae sensu lat.) introduced and naturalising in Tunisia and North Africa Authors: Mokni, Ridha El, and Verloove, Filip Source: Bradleya, 2021(39) : 221-235 Published By: British Cactus and Succulent Society URL: https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n39.2021.a23 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Bradleya on 18 Jun 2021 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by Botanic Garden Meise Bradleya 39/2021 pages 221–235 Additional species of Agave (Agavoideae /Agavaceae, Asparagaceae sensu lat.) introduced and naturalising in Tunisia and North Africa Ridha El Mokni1,2,3 and Filip Verloove4 1. University of Monastir, Laboratory of Botany, Cryptogamy and Plant Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Avenue Avicenna, 5000-Monastir, Tunisia. (email: [email protected]) 2.University of Jendouba, Laboratory of Silvo-Pastoral Resources, Silvo-Pastoral Institute of Tabarka, B P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of Feral Agave and Furcraea (Agavaceae, Asparagaceae S. Lat.) in the Canary Islands (Spain)
    Plant Ecology and Evolution 152 (3): 470–498, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2019.1634 REGULAR PAPER A synopsis of feral Agave and Furcraea (Agavaceae, Asparagaceae s. lat.) in the Canary Islands (Spain) Filip Verloove1,*, Joachim Thiede2, Águedo Marrero Rodríguez3, Marcos Salas-Pascual4, Jorge Alfredo Reyes-Betancort5, Elizabeth Ojeda-Land6 & Gideon F. Smith7 1Meise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, B-1860 Meise, Belgium 2Schenefelder Holt 3, 22589 Hamburg, Germany 3Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo, Unidad Asociada al CSIC, C/ El Palmeral nº 15, Tafira Baja, E-35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain 4Instituto de Estudios Ambientales y Recursos Naturales (i-UNAT), Campus Universitario de Tafira, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, E-35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain 5Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava (ICIA). C/ Retama 2, 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Canary Islands, Spain 6Viceconsejería de Medio Ambiente. Gobierno de Canarias. C/ Avda. de Anaga, 35. Planta 11. 38071 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain 7Department of Botany, P.O. Box 77000, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, 6031 South Africa / Centre for Functional Ecology, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-455 Coimbra, Portugal *Corresponding author: [email protected] Background – Species of Agave and Furcraea (Agavaceae, Asparagaceae s. lat.) are widely cultivated as ornamentals in Mediterranean climates. An increasing number is escaping and naturalising, also in natural habitats in the Canary Islands (Spain). However, a detailed treatment of variously naturalised and invasive species found in the wild in the Canary Islands is not available and, as a result, species identification is often problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Categories for Natural and Agricultural Ecosystem Management
    Weed Categories for Natural and Agricultural Ecosystem Management R.H. Groves (Convenor), J.R. Hosking, G.N. Batianoff, D.A. Cooke, I.D. Cowie, R.W. Johnson, G.J. Keighery, B.J. Lepschi, A.A. Mitchell, M. Moerkerk, R.P. Randall, A.C. Rozefelds, N.G. Walsh and B.M. Waterhouse DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY Weed categories for natural and agricultural ecosystem management R.H. Groves1 (Convenor), J.R. Hosking2, G.N. Batianoff3, D.A. Cooke4, I.D. Cowie5, R.W. Johnson3, G.J. Keighery6, B.J. Lepschi7, A.A. Mitchell8, M. Moerkerk9, R.P. Randall10, A.C. Rozefelds11, N.G. Walsh12 and B.M. Waterhouse13 1 CSIRO Plant Industry & CRC for Australian Weed Management, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 2 NSW Agriculture & CRC for Australian Weed Management, RMB 944, Tamworth, NSW 2340 3 Queensland Herbarium, Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong, Qld 4066 4 Animal & Plant Control Commission, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide, SA 5001 5 NT Herbarium, Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, GPO Box 990, Darwin, NT 0801 6 Department of Conservation & Land Management, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6065 7 Australian National Herbarium, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 8 Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy, AQIS & CRC for Australian Weed Management, c/- NT Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801 9 Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, NRE & CRC for Australian Weed Management, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Vic. 3401 10 Department of Agriculture Western Australia & CRC for Australian Weed Management, Locked Bag No. 4, Bentley, WA 6983 11 Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, GPO Box 1164, Hobart, Tas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naturalized Vascular Plants of Western Australia 1
    12 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.19(1) 2004 Distribution in IBRA Regions Western Australia is divided into 26 The naturalized vascular plants of Western Australia natural regions (Figure 1) that are used for 1: Checklist, environmental weeds and distribution in bioregional planning. Weeds are unevenly distributed in these regions, generally IBRA regions those with the greatest amount of land disturbance and population have the high- Greg Keighery and Vanda Longman, Department of Conservation and Land est number of weeds (Table 4). For exam- Management, WA Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western ple in the tropical Kimberley, VB, which Australia 6946, Australia. contains the Ord irrigation area, the major cropping area, has the greatest number of weeds. However, the ‘weediest regions’ are the Swan Coastal Plain (801) and the Abstract naturalized, but are no longer considered adjacent Jarrah Forest (705) which contain There are 1233 naturalized vascular plant naturalized and those taxa recorded as the capital Perth, several other large towns taxa recorded for Western Australia, com- garden escapes. and most of the intensive horticulture of posed of 12 Ferns, 15 Gymnosperms, 345 A second paper will rank the impor- the State. Monocotyledons and 861 Dicotyledons. tance of environmental weeds in each Most of the desert has low numbers of Of these, 677 taxa (55%) are environmen- IBRA region. weeds, ranging from five recorded for the tal weeds, recorded from natural bush- Gibson Desert to 135 for the Carnarvon land areas. Another 94 taxa are listed as Results (containing the horticultural centre of semi-naturalized garden escapes. Most Total naturalized flora Carnarvon).
    [Show full text]