sign in sign up
<<
Home , Polyakov action

arXiv:hep-th/0110227v1 24 Oct 2001 elivrac fpbae.Orcnieain a eextended be can considerations . geom Our a provides p-branes. derivation of this invariance that Weyl argue deriv We also p-branes. we for dimensions higher in syste action such effective for gravity- invariance Weyl ering the clarifies procedure Our plained. ∗ [email protected] October/2001 12.60.-i 04.50.+h, 11.10.Kk, numbers: Pacs ehns ofiddffrn elivratpbae n Dp- and p-branes invariant Weyl different find to mechanism A EAK NWY NAIN -RNSADDp-BRANES AND P-BRANES INVARIANT WEYL ON REMARKS autdd inisF´ısico-Matem´aticas Universid Ciencias la de de Facultad eSnla ..800 uica iao,M´exico Culiac´an Sinaloa, 80010, C.P. Sinaloa, de .A Nieto A. J. Abstract 1 ∗ s eie,b consid- by Besides, ms. dAut´onomaad otecs fsuper-p- of case the to tia cnrofrthe for scenario etrical elinvariant Weyl a e cin sex- is actions s 1.- INTRODUCTION

It is known that, in theory, the Weyl invariance of the Polyakov action plays a central role [1]. In fact, in subjects such as , Teichmuler space and critical dimensions, among many others, are consequences of the local diff x Weyl symmetry in the partition function associated to the Polyakov action. In the early eighties there was a general believe that the Weyl invariance was the key symmetry to distinguish string theory from other p-branes. However, in 1986 it was noticed that such an invariance may be also implemented to any p-brane and in particular to the

3-brane [2]. The formal relation between the Weyl invariance and p-branes was established two years later independently by a number of authors [3]. It spites of its possible relevance in M-theory, it seems that except for some works [4] the subject has been very much ignored. Recently, however, the importance of the Weyl invariance has been revived in connection with 2d-gravity [5] and Dp-branes [6].

On the other hand, in a recent work [7] it was proved that it is possible to obtain the p- brane action from a gravity-dilaton effective action in higher dimensions. This work has some relevance, among other things, because it opens the possibility to understand symmetries of the p-branes from a geometrical point of view. In particular, it may be of special interest to understand the origin of the Weyl invariance for p-branes from a geometrical scenario. In this article, we prove that using a particular ansatz for the metric, a gravity-dilaton action in D + 1 dimensions is reduced to a Weyl invariant p-brane action, clarifying with this the geometric origin of Weyl invariance for p-branes. As reference [7], the present work may be of special interest in the Randall-Sundrum scenario [8-9], string theory [10] and M-theory [11]. We start making some general remarks on the Weyl invariant p-branes and D-branes. Specifically, we show a mechanism to obtain the Weyl invariant actions for p-branes and D-branes from the Dirac-Nambu-Goto p-brane action and the Born-Infeld Dp-brane action, respectively. We also apply a similar mechanism to the case of null p-branes and derive a

2 Weyl invariant action for such system. The plan of this work is as follows. In section 2, we show a mechanism to obtain Weyl invariant p-branes from the Dirac-Nambu-Goto p-brane action. In section 3, we apply a similar procedure in order to obtain Weyl invariant Dp-branes from the Born-Infeld Dp- brane action. In section 4, we derive a Weyl invariant action for null p-branes. In section 5, we obtain a Weyl invariant p-brane action from a gravity-dilaton effective action. Finally, in section 6 we make some final comments.

2.- WEYL INVARIANT P-BRANES FROM DIRAC-NAMBU-GOTO P-BRANE ACTION

Consider a p-brane moving in a d + 1-dimensional -time. The evolution of such a system may be described by using the d + 1-scalar field coordinates xµˆ(ξA) where µˆ =0, 1, ..., d and ξA, with A =0, 1, ..., p, are arbitrary parameters.

The Dirac-Nambu-Goto type action for p-branes is

S(1) = T dp+1ξ√ h, (1) p − p Z − where h = det(hAB), with

µˆ νˆ hAB = ∂Ax ∂Bx ηµˆνˆ, (2)

and Tp is a fundamental constant measuring the inertia of the p-brane. Here,

η = diag( 1, 1, ..., 1) (3) µˆνˆ −

is the Minkowski metric.

A Let us now consider a symmetric auxiliary world-volume metric gAB = gAB(ξ ) and let us assume that the integrand √ h in (1) is replaced by √ g where g = det(g ). The − − AB question is how to get an equivalent action to (1) with √ g as the integrand instead of − √ h. Clearly, the integrands √ g and √ h are equivalent if we assume the constraint − − −

3 h g =0. (4) AB − AB

So, by introducing the lagrange multipliers ΛAB =ΛBA we discover the action

S(2) = T dp+1ξ(√ g +ΛAB(h g )) (5) p − p Z − AB − AB

(1) AB which is equivalent to Sp . In fact, the Λ field equation implies the constraint (4) which

AB (2) allows to reduce (5) to (1). The point is that gAB and Λ provide to the action Sp with

(1) more degrees of freedom than Sp , but these additional degrees of freedom can be eliminated

(2) (1) by means of (4) reducing Sp to Sp .

(1) AB We may obtain another equivalent action to Sp if instead of varying Λ in (5) we make

variations of gAB. We find that gAB field equation is

1 √ ggAB ΛAB =0. (6) 2 − −

This equation allows to eliminate ΛAB from (5). Thus, we obtain the alternative action

T S(3) = p dp+1ξ√ g(gABh (p 1)) (7) p − 2 Z − AB − −

which is the familiar Polyakov type action for p-branes. Thus, starting from the Dirac- Nambu-Goto action (1) we have found a mechanism to derive the Polyakov action for p-

(1) (3) branes (7). The procedure to derive Sp starting from Sp is well known. One first derive

(3) AB from Sp the g field equation

1 h g (gCDh (p 1)) = 0. (8) AB − 2 AB CD − −

Multiplying this expression by gAB, it is not difficult to obtain, for p =1, the formula 6

AB g hAB = p +1. (9)

Substituting (9) into (8) leads us to the constraint (4) which allows to reduce (7) to (1). Let us now follow a slightly different procedure. Consider the rescaling of the metric g Φg , where Φ = Φ(ξ) is a scale factor. If we apply this transformation to (5), AB → AB AB leaving Λ and hAB unchanged, we obtain

4 ˆ p p+1 AB S(2) = T d +1ξ(Φ 2 √ g +Λ (h Φg )). (10) p − p Z − AB − AB

Varing gAB in (10) leads to

1 p+1 AB AB √ gΦ 2 g ΦΛ =0. (11) 2 − −

Solving for ΛAB gives

− AB 1 p 1 AB Λ = √ gΦ 2 g . (12) 2 −

Substituting this result back into (10) yields

− W Tp p p 1 AB p+1 S 1 = d +1ξ√ g(Φ 2 g h (p 1)Φ 2 ). (13) p − 2 Z − AB − −

W1 Note that if we set Φ = 1 then (13) is reduced to (7). Therefore, the action Sp is a

(3) generelization of Sp . We also discover that (13) is invariant under the transformations

− Φ λ 1Φ (14) →

and

g λg . (15) AB → AB

where λ(ξ) is an arbitrary function. Of course, (15) is a Weyl transformation. In order to

clarify this point let us integrate out Φ from (13). We find the formula

gABh Φ= AB . (16) p +1

Substituting this result into (13) leads to

(4) Tp p+1 AB p+1 S d ξ√ g g h 2 . p = p+1 Z ( AB) (17) −(p + 1) 2 −

We recognize this action as the Weyl invariant action for p-branes [2]-[3]. In fact, the action

(4) Sp is invariant under the Weyl transformation (15). Moreover, it is straightforward to see

(1) (4) that the Weyl invariant action Sp is recovered upon eliminating gAB from Sp via its field

(4) (1) equation, showing with this that Sp is classically equivalent to Sp .

5 If we redefine Φ as

2 Φ= φ p+1 (18) we find that (13) becomes

Tp p−1 SW2 = dp+1ξ√ g(φ p+1 gABh (p 1)φ) (19) p − 2 Z − AB − −

which is the action proposed in reference [6]. An interesting possibility arises if instead of using (18) we redefine Φ as

2 Φ= ϕ p−1 , (20) with p 1 = 0. In fact, in this case the action (13) becomes − 6

Tp p+1 SW3 = dp+1ξ√ g(ϕgABh (p 1)ϕ p−1 ). (21) p − 2 Z − AB − −

This action is interesting because in the second term of (21) the scalar field ϕ gives a power

potential. The case p = 1 is solved if in (21) we set ϕ =1.

3.- WEYL INVARIANT Dp-BRANES FROM BORN-INFELD Dp-BRANE ACTION

In this section, we shall show that a similar procedure, as in the previous section, can be applied to the case of Dp-branes. Consider the Born-Infeld action for Dp-branes

(1) p+1 S = Tp d ξ f, (22) Dp − Z q− where Tp is the Dp-brane “tension” and f = det(fAB) with

f = h . AB AB −FAB

Here, is a two form given by FAB

= F B , (23) FAB AB − AB 6 where FAB is the field strength

F = ∂ A ∂ A (24) AB A B − B A of a U(1) gauge field AB and BAB is the NS antisymmetric two form field. Note that if = 0 then (22) is reduced to (1) and therefore (22) is a generalization of the Dirac- FAB Nambu-Goto type action for p-branes. Following a similar procedure as in the previous section we introduce an auxiliary metric

A world-volume metric sAB = sAB(ξ ). In contrast to gAB the second rank tensor sAB has no symmetries. If we consider the constraint

f s =0 (25) AB − AB and introduce the lagrange multipliers ΣAB, it is straightforward to show that the action

S(2) = T dp+1ξ(√ s + ΣAB(f s )) (26) Dp − p Z − AB − AB

(1) is equivalent to SDp. (2) Varying sAB in SDp we find the formula

1 √ ssAB ΣAB =0. (27) 2 − −

This equation allows to eliminate ΣAB from (26). We obtain

T S(3) = p dp+1ξ√ s(sABf (p 1)) (28) Dp − 2 Z − AB − −

which is the analogue of the Polyakov type action for p-branes (see Ref. [12]). Using the field

(1) (3) (1) (3) equation for sAB one can recover the action SDp from SDp. So, SDp and SDp are classically equivalent actions.

Now, consider the rescaling s Φs , where Φ(ξ) is again a scale factor function and AB → AB AB apply this transformation to (26), leaving Σ and fAB unchanged. We obtain

(2)ˆ p p+1 AB S = T d +1ξ(Φ 2 √ s + Σ (f Φs )). (29) Dp − p Z − AB − AB

7 Varying sAB we find

1 p+1 AB AB √ gΦ 2 s ΦΣ =0. (30) 2 − −

Solving for ΛAB and substituting the result back into (29) yields

p−1 p+1 W1 Tp p AB S = d +1ξ√ s(Φ 2 s f (p 1)Φ 2 ). (31) Dp − 2 Z − AB − −

W1 We discover that SDp is invariant under the transformations

Φ λ−1Φ (32) →

and

s λs . (33) AB → AB

Integrating Φ in (31) we find the field equation

sABf Φ= AB . (34) p +1

Susbtituting this result into (31) leads to

(4) Tp p+1 AB p+1 S d ξ√ s s f 2 Dp = p+1 Z ( AB) (35) −(p + 1) 2 − which is a generalization of the Weyl invariant action for p-branes (17) (see Ref. [13]).

If we redefine Φ as

2 Φ= φ p+1 , (36)

we find that (31) becomes

− W Tp p 1 S 2 = dp+1ξ√ s(φ p+1 sABf (p 1)φ). (37) Dp − 2 Z − AB − −

Similar, if we redefine Φ as

2 Φ= ϕ p−1 , (38) with p 1 =0, we find − 6 8 W Tp p+1 S 3 = dp+1ξ√ s(ϕsABf (p 1)ϕ p−1 ). (39) Dp − 2 Z − AB − −

W1 W2 W3 It seems that the actions SDp ,SDp or SDp have not been considered in the literature. In reference [6] a Weyl invariant action for Dp-branes was proposed, but the authors used the

(3) action of Zeid and Hull [14] rather than SDp action.

4.- WEYL INVARIANT NULL P-BRANES

The procedure may also work out for null p-branes. Let us show in this section this fact.

Null p-branes are defined for the case Tp =0. So, the action (1) is not appropriate for this case. The key is first to write h as

µˆ1...µˆp+1 h = σ σµˆ1...µˆp+1 , (40) where

µˆ1...µˆp+1 1 A1...Ap+1 µˆ1 µˆp+1 σ = 1 ε ∂A1 x ...∂Ap+1 x . (41) [(p + 1)!] 2

Then, one can show that the action (1) is equivalent to

γ S(1) = dp+1ξ(σµˆ1...µˆp+1 p (pµˆ1...µˆp+1 p + T 2)). (42) p Z µˆ1...µˆp+1 − 2 µˆ1...µˆp+1 p

where γ is a lagrange multiplier. If we eliminate pµˆ1...µˆp+1 from this action we get

1 − S(1) = dp+1ξ(γ 1σµˆ1...µˆp+1 σ γT 2). (43) p 2 Z µˆ1...µˆp+1 − p

By eliminating γ from (43) leads us to recover action (1). The importance of (42) or (43) is that it now makes sense to set Tp =0. In this case (43) is reduced to the Schild type null p-brane action [15]

1 − S(1) = dp+1ξγ 1h. (44) Np 2 Z

Now, consider the equivalent action

9 1 − S(2) = dp+1ξ(γ 1g +ΛAB(h g )). (45) Np 2 Z AB − AB

The gAB field equation is

γ−1ggAB ΛAB =0. (46) −

Using this expression we learn that (45) is reduced to

1 S(2) = dp+1ξγ−1g(gABh p). (47) Np 2 Z AB −

Considering the rescaling g Φg we see that the action (45) becomes AB → AB

ˆ S(2) = dp+1ξ(Φp+1γ−1g +ΛAB(h Φg )). (48) Np Z AB − AB

Now, we have

γ−1Φp+1ggAB ΦΛAB =0. (49) −

Therefore, we obtain

SW1 = dp+1ξ(γ−1g(ΦpgABh pΦp+1)). (50) Np Z AB −

Two alternative actions are

W − p S 2 = dp+1ξ(γ 1g(φ p+1 gABh pφ)) (51) Np Z AB − and

− p+1 SW3 = dp+1ξ(γ 1g(ϕgABh pϕ p )), (52) p Z AB −

1 1 depending if we redefine Φ as Φ = φ p+1 or Φ= ϕ p , respectively.

In (52) varying ϕ we find the field equation

1 ϕ = (gABh )p. (53) (p + 1)p AB

W3 Therefore, SNp becomes

10 (1 p) − S(4) = − dp+1ξγ 1g(gABh )p+1 (54) Np (1 + p)p Z AB which is the Weyl invariant action for null p-branes [16].

5.- WEYL INVARIANT P-BRANES FROM A GRAVITY-DILATON ACTION

Here, we shall closely follow reference [7]. Our starting point is the gravity-dilaton effective action with cosmological constant:

S = 1 dD+1y√ ge−φ(ϕ(R +( φ)2)+2Λϕa), (55) − 16πGD+1 Z − ∇

α where GD+1 is the Newton constant in D + 1 dimensions, φ = φ(y ) is the dilaton field, Λ and a are constants, ϕ is a lagrange multiplier and R is the Ricci scalar obtained from the Riemann tensor

Rµ =Γµ Γµ +Γµ Γσ Γµ Γσ (56) ναβ νβ,α − να,β σα νβ − σβ να

µ and the metric tensor gαβ, with α, β =0, 1..., D. Here, Γαβ is the Christoffel symbol:

1 Γµ = gµν(g + g g ). (57) αβ 2 να,β νβ,α − αβ,ν

Consider the ansatz

C gAB =g ˜AB(y ),

C C kl gij = ak(y )al(y )ηij , (58)

gAi = 0.

Here, the indices A, B, ...etc. run from 0 to p, the indices i, j, ...etc. run from p +1 to D and

kl the only non-vanishing terms of ηij are

kl ηij = 1, when k = l = i = j. (59)

Assume that

11 φ = φ(yC) (60)

and

ϕ(yC ). (61)

Using (56), (57) and (58) one can compute the non-vanishing Chistoffel symbols and

µν the Reimann tensor. The result for the Ricci scalar R = g Rµν (see Ref. [7] for detail computation, and Ref. [17] for the case of p = 0) is

R = 2aiDA∂ a aiaj∂ a ∂Aa − A i − A i j (62)

i j A kl ˜ +a a ∂Aak∂ alηij + R,

where R˜ is the Ricci scalar associated to the metricg ˜AB. Thus, the action (55) becomes

S = 1 dp+1y√ g˜Πa e−φ ϕ( 2aiDA∂ a aiaj∂Aa ∂ a 16πGp+1 s A i i A j − R − { − − (63)

+aiaj∂Aa ∂ a ηkl + ∂Aφ∂ φ + R˜)+2Λϕa , k A l ij A } where Gp+1 is the Newton constant in p + 1 dimensions. The relation between Gp+1 and

GD+1 is

1 V = d , (64) Gp+1 GD+1

where V is a volume element in d = D p dimensions. This action can be rewritten as d − S = 1 dp+1y√ gD˜ AJ 16πGp+1 A − R −

1 dp+1y√ g˜Πa e−φ ϕ(aiaj∂Aa ∂ a 2∂Aφai∂ a 16πGp+1 s i A j A i − R − { − (65)

+∂Aφ∂ φ aiaj∂Aa ∂ a ηkl)+2Λϕa A − k A l ij }

1 dp+1y√ g˜Πa e−φϕR˜ + 1 dp+1y√ gJ˜ ϕ−1∂Aϕ, 16πGp+1 s 16πGp+1 A − R − R − 12 where

J =( 2Πa e−φϕai∂ a ). (66) A − s A i

Dropping the total derivative, the action (65) is reduced to

S = 1 dp+1y√ g˜Πa e−φ ϕ(aiaj∂Aa ∂ a 2∂Aφai∂ a + 16πGp+1 s i A j A i − R − { −

+∂Aφ∂ φ aiaj∂Aa ∂ a ηkl)+2Λϕa (67) A − k A l ij }

1 dp+1y√ g˜Πa e−φϕR˜ + 1 dp+1y√ gJ˜ ϕ−1∂Aϕ. 16πGp+1 s 16πGp+1 A − R − R − If we define the coordinate x0 as

−φ −x0 Πase = e , (68)

the brane coupling “constant” Tp in the form

0 e−x 1 = (69) 16πGp+1 2Tp and the variables xi as

xi ln a (70) ≡ i we find that (67) becomes

p+1 S = 1 d y √ gϕ˜ (˜gAB∂ xµˆ∂ xνˆη ) 2Λϕa] 2 Tp A B µˆνˆ R − − (71)

p+1 1 d y √ gϕ˜ R˜ + 1 dp+1y√ gJ˜ ϕ−1∂Aϕ. 2 Tp 16πGp+1 A − R − R − where η = diag( 1, 1, ..., 1). Here the indicesµ, ˆ ν,ˆ ...etc run from 0 to d = D p. µˆνˆ − − Let us assume now the case in which we can drop the last two terms from (71). Setting the constant Λ as

p 1 Λ= − (72) 2

13 and the quantity a as

p +1 a = (73) p 1 − we obtain

p+1 1 d y p+1 AB −1 S = g˜(ϕg˜ hAB (p 1)ϕ p ), (74) 2 Z Tp q− − −

where

µˆ νˆ hAB = ∂Ax ∂Bx ηµˆνˆ. (75)

W3 We recognize (74) as the action Sp given in (21). Integrating out ϕ we find

AB g˜ hAB p−1 ϕ =( ) 2 . (76) p +1

Substituting this result for ϕ into (75) we get

p+1 1 d y AB p+1 S = g˜(˜g h ) 2 (77) p+1 Z AB (p + 1) 2 Tp q−

which is the Weyl invariant action for p-branes. Therefore, we have shown that the Weyl invariant action (77) follows from the gravity-dilaton action (55) when the constants Λ and a have the form (72) and (73) respectively, that is, we have shown a mechanism to derive (74) from the following action

− p+1 S = 1 dD+1y√ ge φ(ϕ(R +( φ)2)+(p 1)ϕ p−1 ), (78) − 16πGD+1 Z − ∇ −

Integrating out ϕ in (78) we derive the action

− p+1 1 D+1 φ 2 2 S = p+1 d y√ ge (R +( φ) ) , (81) Z − 16πGD+1(p+1) 2 − ∇

Therefore, we have a higher curvature theory as an starting point. It is interesting to note that only for the case p =1, corresponding to strings, (81) turns out to be an action linear in curvature tensor R.

14 6.- FINAL COMMENTS

In this article we have clarified some aspects of the Weyl invariant actions for p-branes, Dp-branes and null p-branes. In sections 2, 3 and 4 we develope a mechanism to derive different Weyl invariant p-branes and Dp-branes actions. While in section 5 we have shown a geometric origin of Weyl invarint actions for p-branes.

So far, our treatment of the equivalence of various Weyl invariant actions has been clas- sical, without taking into account certain determinants of the associated partition function. Such determinants may lead to some anomalies allowing equivalence only under certain con- ditions. For instance, at the quantum level the Polyakov type action for p-branes (7) is equivalent to the Dirac-Nambu-Goto type action (1) only if we set d = 25.

The supersymmetrization of the procedure proposed in second, third and fourth sections seem to be straightforward. One needs simply to use the prescription

∂ xµˆ Eµˆ = ∂ ZMˆ Πµˆ , (82) A → A A Mˆ ZMˆ xµˆ, θαˆ µˆ where =( ) are the coordinates of a and ΠMˆ are the supervielbein. In this case the action (13) can be generalized to

p−1 p+1 Tp µˆ W1 p+1 2 AB νˆ 2 Sp = 2 d ξ√ g(Φ g EAEBηµˆνˆ (p 1)Φ ) − R − − − (83)

µˆ +1 1 εA1...Ap+1 Eµˆ1 ...E p A ... , + (p+1)! A1 Ap+1 µˆ1 µˆp+1 where Aµˆ1 ...µˆp+1 is a completely antisymmetric gauge field tensor. This action is invariant under the world volume diffeomorphisms and the Weyl tranformation (14)-(15). It may be interesting for further works to follow similar procedure as the one of section 5 to find the super p-branes actions from a higher dimensional action. For instance, this may help to understand the the so called κ symmetry from a geometrical

perspective. Recently, a Weyl invariant spinning membrane action [18] was constructed where the and S- are broken. It may be interesting to relate the present work with such a system.

15 Acknowledgments

We are indebted with I. Galaviz for helpful discussions.

16 REFERENCES

[1] J. Polchinski, StringTheory, VOL. I and II, (Cambridge, UK: Univ. Press (1998)).

[2] J. A. Nieto Classical Test Particles and (4+N)-Dimensional Theories of Space Time, PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin (1986); J. A. Nieto, C. Nu˜nez and L. C. Shepley, “Dynamical Cosmological Constant from a Four-Index Antisymmetric Gauge

Field”, unpublished (1986) Austin Texas.

[3] M. S. Alves and J. Barcelos Neto, Europhys. Lett 7, 395 (1988), (Erratum-ibid. 8:90,1989) ; U. Lindstrom and G. Theodoridis Phys. Lett. B208, 407 (1988); J. A.

Nieto, Rev. Mex. Fis. 34, 597 (1988).

[4] U. Lindstrom, M. Rocek, Phys. Lett. B218, 207 (1989); A. Karlhede and U. Lindstrom,

Phys. Lett. B209, 441 (1988); C. Alvear, R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto, Phys. Lett B273, 415 (1991); J. Barcelos-Neto, Phys. Lett. B245, 26 (1990), Addendum-ibid. B249, 551 (1990); J. A. Nieto and C. Nu˜nez , Nuovo Cim. B106, 1045 (1991); L. Cendejas and J. A. Nieto, Nuovo Cim. B105, 1159 (1990); E.R.C. Abraham, P.K. Townsend and P.S. Howe, Class. Quant. Grav. 6, 1541 (1989).

[5] M. Cavaglia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A15, 2113 (2000); hep-th/0011136.

[6] J. A. Garc´ia, R. Linares, J. D. Vergara, Phys. Lett. B503, 154 (2001); hep-th/0011085

[7] J. A. Nieto and C. M. Yee, Mod. Phys. Lett. A15, 1611 (2000).

[8] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).

[9] H. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B429, 263 (1998); Phys. Rev. D59 086004 (1999); I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B436, 257 (1998); N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and J. March-Russell, hep-th/9809124.

[10] M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten, Vol. I and II (Cambridge,

17 Uk: Univ. Press ( 1987))

[11] E. Witten,Nucl. Phys. B443, 85 (1995); P. Horova and E. Witten, ibid. B460, 506 (1995); B475, 94 (1996).

[12] U. Lindstrom, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A3, 2401 (1988).

[13] B. Brinne, S. E. Hjelmeland and Ulf Lindstrom Phys. Lett. B459, 507 (1999); hep- th/9904175.

[14] M. Abou Zeid and C. M. Hull, Phys. Lett. B404, 264 (1997); hep-th/9802179.

[15] Schild, Phys. Rev. D16, 1560 (1977).

[16] J. A. Nieto, Rev. Mex. Fis. 36, S204 (1990).

[17] M. Gasperini; Elementary Introduction to Pre-Big-Bang Cosmology and to the Relic Background, proceedings of SIGRAV Graduate School in Contemporary Rel- ativity and Gravitational Physics, Villa Olmo, Como, Italy, 19-24 Apr 1999; hep-

th/9907067

[18] C. Castro, Remaks on the Existence of Spinning Membrane Action: hep-th/0007031

18