Check List Lists of Species Check List 11(6): 1798, 27 November 2015 Doi: ISSN 1809-127X © 2015 Check List and Authors
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Summer/Fall 2012
Wildland Weeds SUMMER/SUMMER/FALLFALL 2012 Call for Abstracts We invite abstract submissions for contributed oral or poster presentations at the 2013 FLEPPC/SE-EPPC Joint Annual Symposium. This year’s theme is Plant Wars: The EPPC’s Strike Back. The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 21st through Thursday, May 23nd at the Edgewater Beach Resort in Panama City Beach, Florida. Deadline for Abstract Submissions: February 15, 2013 Program Topics: Submissions Student Poster Competition: All student posters are welcome for any area presented at the annual meeting are eligible for of invasive plant species consideration. Posters may have multiple authors, but investigation, including but not the first author must be a graduate student. A team limited to: composed of representatives from each SE-EPPC chapter will judge student posters, based on scientific • Ecology merit, design, and poster discussion with judges. • Economics Awards: • Management 1st place: $150; 2nd place: $100; 3rd place: $50. • Restoration To participate, send an email indicating interest • Risk Assessment by 5 pm January 31st, 2013, to Dr. Nancy Loewenstein, [email protected] • Policy and Regulation Please include SE-EPPC Student Poster Award in • Evolutionary Biology the subject line. • Interdisciplinary Projects SUBMIT YOUR ABSTRACT ONLINE! www.fleppc.org/Symposium/2013/abstractsubmission.html Abstracts must include the following information: • Title of the proposed paper or poster • Full name and professional title of the author(s), affiliation, mailing address, phone number(s), and email address • If there are multiple authors, please provide the above information for each. • Text of the abstract (limit of 400 words) If web access is not available, please submit abstracts to: Sherry Williams, Seminole County Natural Lands Program, 3485 N. -
Tree Ferns Dominate Secondary Succession in Abandoned Pineapple Plantations Around Manu National Park, Peru
Acta BotanicaBotanica Malacitana Malacitana 42: 42, x-x, Núm. 2017 1 (2017), 141-148 ArtículoArtículo DOI:CabeceraO. Schilling http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/abm.v42i1.3004 & A. Tejedor. Tree ferns Manu National Park Artículo141 Tree ferns dominate secondary succession in abandoned pineapple plantations around Manu National Park, Peru Olivia Schilling1 and Adrian Tejedor2* 1The Evergreen State College. 2The School for Field Studies Correspondencia Abstract A.Tejedor e-mail: [email protected] Habitat management and restoration in buffer zones of national parks is critical Recibido: 24 junio 2017 for maintaining ecosystem services and biological connectivity in and around the Aceptado: 16 septiembre 2017 parks’ core protected areas. Vegetation succession in abandoned plantations Publicado on-line: diciembre 2017 in buffer zones may take different paths that reach climax ecosystems in more or less time depending on the conditions of initial succession, thus enhancing or hindering biological connectivity and ecosystem services. This study documents the dominance of tree ferns in the initial stages of vegetation succession on abandoned pineapple plantations on the Andean foothills around Manu National Park, Peru, and discusses the role it may have on ecosystem restoration. Four years after abandonment, tree fern gametophytes grow under the shade of pineapple plants and melastomes. After 6-10 years of succession, the vegetation is dominated by a tree fern community composed of at least eight species, of which the most common are by far Cyathea delgadii and Cyathea microdonta. Cyathea microdonta functions as a short-lived pioneer, reaching its peak of live stem density in 6 to10 years and dying off in older plots. -
COMMUNITY Based CONSERVATION STRATEGY for TREE FERN with SPECIAL REFERENCE to PANCHASE REGION
Community based Tree Fern Conservation Strategy: With Special Reference to Panchase region October, 2017 Prepared by Ichchha Thapa, Kumod Lekhak, Padam Budha and Subin Kalu COMMUNITY based CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR TREE FERN WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PANCHASE REGION Production of this document was made possible by the generous support of The Rufford Foundation through a Rufford Small Research grant for a project entitled “Ecological exploration of endangered tree fern for community based conservation in Panchase mountain ecosystem, Nepal”. Copyright: © 2017 Ecological exploration of endangered tree fern for community based conservation in Panchase mountain ecosystem, Nepal All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. Page ii COMMUNITY based CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR TREE FERN WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PANCHASE REGION DISCLAIMER This Community based Tree Fern Conservation Strategy was prepared to guide communities and local stakeholders in various efforts for the conservation and better management of the tree ferns in the Panchase Area of Nepal. It was prepared using both the published and unpublished information on tree ferns from Nepal and other regions. This strategy does not represent a management decision by any authorized authority but rather offers best guidance expedited by the science for local stakeholders and decision makers. Although the best scientific information available was used to the extent possible, it is expected that new information will arise. In the essence of continuous learning, knowledge generation and adaptive management, if you have new information that will assist in the conservation of tree fern species, please contact the authors through the contact information available in the document. -
Infrageneric Revision of the Fern Genus Deparia (Athyriaceae, Aspleniineae, Polypodiales)
Systematic Botany (2018), 43(3): pp. 645–655 © Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364418X697364 Date of publication August 10, 2018 Infrageneric Revision of the Fern Genus Deparia (Athyriaceae, Aspleniineae, Polypodiales) Li-Yaung Kuo,1,7 Atsushi Ebihara,2 Tian-Chuan Hsu,3 Germinal Rouhan,4 Yao-Moan Huang,5 Chun-Neng Wang,1,6,8 Wen-Liang Chiou,3 and Masahiro Kato2 1Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan 2Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Amakubo 4-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0005, Japan 3Botanical Garden Division, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei 10066, Taiwan 4Mus´eum national d’Histoire naturelle, Institut de Syst´ematique, Evolution, Biodiversit´e ((ISYEB) CNRS, Sorbonne Universit´e EPHE), Herbier national, 16 rue Buffon CP39, F-75005 Paris, France 5Silviculture Division, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei 10066, Taiwan 6Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan 7Current address: Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA ([email protected]) 8Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Sven Buerki Abstract—Current molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly and circumscription of the athyrioid fern genus Deparia (Athyr- iaceae), which includes previously recognized genera including Athyriopsis, 3Depazium, Dictyodroma, Dryoathyrium (5 Parathyrium), Lunathyrium, and Neotriblemma (5 Triblemma Ching), and 3Neotribleparia. This broad generic concept has been adopted in several recent taxonomic treatments, including the Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group I. However, the infrageneric taxonomy of Deparia still needs further revision. In this study, we provide a new infrageneric classification with five sections and three subsections based on the phylogenetic evidence. -
New Species and Records of Tree Ferns (Cyatheaceae, Pteridophyta) from the Northern Andes
Org. Divers. Evol. 6, Electr. Suppl. 13: 1 - 11 (2006) © Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik URL: http://www.senckenberg.de/odes/06-13.htm URN: urn:nbn:de:0028-odes0613-1 New species and records of tree ferns (Cyatheaceae, Pteridophyta) from the northern Andes Marcus Lehnert Albrecht-von-Haller Institut, Abt. Systematische Botanik, Universität Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, 37073 Göttingen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Received 7 September 2005 • Accepted 6 December 2005 Abstract Four new species of Cyatheaceae from Ecuador are described: Alsophila conantiana Lehnert, Cyathea brucei Lehnert, C. mora- nii Lehnert, and C. sylvatica Lehnert. Range extensions are documented for Alsophila esmeraldensis R.C. Moran and Cyathea macrocarpa (C. Presl) Domin. Keywords: Alsophila; Cyathea; Andes; Colombia; Ecuador; Guayana Highlands Introduction The pteridophyte flora of Ecuador is one of the richest of most species. These advances enable us to resurrect in the world. About 1300 species have been registe- some species that had been united with others; they red (Jørgensen and León-Yánez 1999), including 177 also allow several new species to be described. endemic species (Valencia et al. 2000). Though mem- bers of the tree fern family were collected and studied New species frequently in the past (Tryon 1970, 1971, 1976, 1986; Gastony 1973; Stolze 1974; Barrington 1978; Conant Alsophila conantiana Lehnert, sp. nov. 1983; Tryon and Stolze 1989), new discoveries are (Fig. 1) still being made (Moran 1991, 1995a, 1998; Lehnert Etymology. This species is named for David S. Co- 2003, 2004). The complex taxonomy of the tree ferns, nant, Lyndon State College, Vermont, to honor his fragmentary collections, inadequate descriptions, and work on Cyatheaceae and especially Alsophila, from special descriptive vocabulary all contribute to our which my studies have greatly benefitted. -
Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D. -
Response of Spores and Young Gametophytes of Cyathea Delgadii Sternb.(Cyatheaceae) and Blechnum Brasiliense Desv.(Blechnaceae) to Different Light Levels
Acta bot. bras. 21(4): 909-915. 2007 Response of spores and young gametophytes of Cyathea delgadii Sternb. (Cyatheaceae) and Blechnum brasiliense Desv. (Blechnaceae) to different light levels Rosane Hiendlmeyer1 and Aurea Maria Randi1,2 Received: July 24, 2006. Accepted: March 27, 2007 RESUMO – (Resposta de esporos e gametófitos jovens de Cyathea delgadii Sternb. (Cyatheaceae) e Blechnum brasiliense Desv. (Blechnaceae) aos diferentes níveis de luz). Luz é um dos fatores limitantes para o estabelecimento das pteridófitas, pois controla a germinação de esporos fotossensíveis. O objetivo deste trabalho foi estudar o efeito de níveis de luz na germinação de esporos de duas pteridófitas ornamentais nativas da Floresta Atlântica, sob condições ambientais. Cyathea delgadii é uma samambaia arbórea e Blechnum brasiliense, subarborescente. O efeito dos níveis de luz foi analisado em abril e em junho/2003, em Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. Esporos esterilizados foram inoculados em “erlenmeyers” contendo meio de cultura composto por macronutrientes, ferro e benomil a 0,01%. Os frascos foram mantidos em caixas de 50 cm3 cobertas por tela “sombrite” que forneceu 5, 22, 42 e 62% de luz natural. Irradiâncias e temperaturas foram medidas diariamente às 14 h no período de estudo. As maiores porcentagens de germinação foram observadas sob 5 e 22% de luz solar para ambas as espécies. A germinação de esporos de Cyathea delgadii sob 22% de luz atingiu 76% e o tempo médio de germinação foi de 19,7 dias; a 5% de luz a germinação atingiu 83,5% e o tempo médio de germinação foi de 20,16 dias. A germinação de Blechnum brasiliense sob 22% de luz atingiu 76% e o tempo médio de germinação foi de 9,06 dias; a 5% de luz a germinação atingiu 84% e o tempo médio de germinação foi de 13,18 dias. -
A Molecular Phylogeny with Morphological Implications and Infrageneric Taxonomy
TAXON 62 (3) • June 2013: 441–457 Wei & al. • Phylogeny and classification of Diplazium SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY Toward a new circumscription of the twinsorus-fern genus Diplazium (Athyriaceae): A molecular phylogeny with morphological implications and infrageneric taxonomy Ran Wei,1,2 Harald Schneider1,3 & Xian-Chun Zhang1 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, P.R. China 2 University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China 3 Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, U.K. Author for correspondence: Xian-Chun Zhang, [email protected] Abstract Diplazium and allied segregates (Allantodia, Callipteris, Monomelangium) represent highly diverse genera belong- ing to the lady-fern family Athyriaceae. Because of the morphological diversity and lack of molecular phylogenetic analyses of this group of ferns, generic circumscription and infrageneric relationships within it are poorly understood. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships of these genera were investigated using a comprehensive taxonomic sampling including 89 species representing all formerly accepted segregates. For each species, we sampled over 6000 DNA nucleotides of up to seven plastid genomic regions: atpA, atpB, matK, rbcL, rps4, rps4-trnS IGS, and trnL intron plus trnL-trnF IGS. Phylogenetic analyses including maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods congruently resolved Allantodia, Cal- lipteris and Monomelangium nested within Diplazium; therefore a large genus concept of Diplazium is accepted to keep this group of ferns monophyletic and to avoid paraphyletic or polyphyletic taxa. Four well-supported clades and eight robust sub- clades were found in the phylogenetic topology. -
Estructura Poblacional Y Características Del Hábitat De Dos Especies De Cyatheaceae Del Estado De Hidalgo, México
Botanical Sciences 92 (2): 259-271, 2014 ECOLOGÍA ESTRUCTURA POBLACIONAL Y CARACTERÍSTICAS DEL HÁBITAT DE DOS ESPECIES DE CYATHEACEAE DEL ESTADO DE HIDALGO, MÉXICO MARÍA GUADALUPE PÉREZ-PAREDES1, ARTURO SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ1,3 Y JOSÉ DANIEL TEJERO-DÍEZ2 1Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Mineral de la Reforma, Hidalgo, México 2Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, México 3Autor para la correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen: Los helechos arborescentes (Cyatheaceae) constituyen un componente conspicuo del bosque húmedo de montaña de las regiones tropicales y subtropicales del mundo. En México su distribución se circunscribe casi por completo al bosque húmedo de montaña, y pese a que algunas de las especies se incluyen dentro de la Norma Ofi cial Mexicana y en las listas rojas internacio- nales, no se cuenta con información sobre el estado actual de sus poblaciones. En el presente estudio se generó información básica acerca de la estructura, densidad poblacional y las características del hábitat de Alsophila fi rma y Cyathea fulva para establecer en qué grado las condiciones actuales de su hábitat ponen en riesgo su supervivencia. Estas dos especies son de amplia distribución dentro del bosque húmedo de montaña, consideradas como “sujetas a protección especial” en la legislación mexicana. Se encontró que las poblaciones de ambas especies son normales o dinámicas, con alto potencial de regeneración, formando parte del sub-dosel en sitios con cobertura arbórea alta, por lo que son tolerantes a la sombra. Las variables que mejor explicaron las diferencias en la densidad poblacional fueron la altitud, la pendiente, la presencia de caminos y la cobertura del suelo para A. -
Polypodiophyta): a Global Assessment of Traits Associated with Invasiveness and Their Distribution and Status in South Africa
Terrestrial alien ferns (Polypodiophyta): A global assessment of traits associated with invasiveness and their distribution and status in South Africa By Emily Joy Jones Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in the Faculty of Science at the Nelson Mandela University April 2019 Supervisor: Dr Tineke Kraaij Co-Supervisor: Dr Desika Moodley Declaration I, Emily Joy Jones (216016479), hereby indicate that the dissertation for Master of Science in the Faculty of Science is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment or completion of any postgraduate qualification to another University or for another qualification. _______________________ 2019-03-11 Emily Joy Jones DATE Official use: In accordance with Rule G4.6.3, 4.6.3 A treatise/dissertation/thesis must be accompanied by a written declaration on the part of the candidate to the effect that it is his/her own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment to another University or for another qualification. However, material from publications by the candidate may be embodied in a treatise/dissertation/thesis. i Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... -
Fern Classification
16 Fern classification ALAN R. SMITH, KATHLEEN M. PRYER, ERIC SCHUETTPELZ, PETRA KORALL, HARALD SCHNEIDER, AND PAUL G. WOLF 16.1 Introduction and historical summary / Over the past 70 years, many fern classifications, nearly all based on morphology, most explicitly or implicitly phylogenetic, have been proposed. The most complete and commonly used classifications, some intended primar• ily as herbarium (filing) schemes, are summarized in Table 16.1, and include: Christensen (1938), Copeland (1947), Holttum (1947, 1949), Nayar (1970), Bierhorst (1971), Crabbe et al. (1975), Pichi Sermolli (1977), Ching (1978), Tryon and Tryon (1982), Kramer (in Kubitzki, 1990), Hennipman (1996), and Stevenson and Loconte (1996). Other classifications or trees implying relationships, some with a regional focus, include Bower (1926), Ching (1940), Dickason (1946), Wagner (1969), Tagawa and Iwatsuki (1972), Holttum (1973), and Mickel (1974). Tryon (1952) and Pichi Sermolli (1973) reviewed and reproduced many of these and still earlier classifica• tions, and Pichi Sermolli (1970, 1981, 1982, 1986) also summarized information on family names of ferns. Smith (1996) provided a summary and discussion of recent classifications. With the advent of cladistic methods and molecular sequencing techniques, there has been an increased interest in classifications reflecting evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic studies robustly support a basal dichotomy within vascular plants, separating the lycophytes (less than 1 % of extant vascular plants) from the euphyllophytes (Figure 16.l; Raubeson and Jansen, 1992, Kenrick and Crane, 1997; Pryer et al., 2001a, 2004a, 2004b; Qiu et al., 2006). Living euphyl• lophytes, in turn, comprise two major clades: spermatophytes (seed plants), which are in excess of 260 000 species (Thorne, 2002; Scotland and Wortley, Biology and Evolution of Ferns and Lycopliytes, ed. -
FLORA of the GUIANAS New York, November 2017
FLORA OF THE GUIANAS NEWSLETTER N° 20 SPECIAL WORKSHOP ISSUE New York, November 2017 FLORA OF THE GUIANAS NEWSLETTER N° 20 SPECIAL WORKSHOP ISSUE Flora of the Guianas (FOG) Meeting and Seminars and Scientific symposium “Advances in Neotropical Plant Systematics and Floristics,” New York, 1–3 November 2017 The Flora of the Guianas is a co-operative programme of: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém; Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Berlin; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, IRD, Centre de Cayenne, Cayenne; Department of Biology, University of Guyana, Georgetown; Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; New York Botanical Garden, New York; Nationaal Herbarium Suriname, Paramaribo; Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Utrecht University branch, Utrecht, and Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. For further information see the website: http://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-guianas/ Published on April 2019 Flora of the Guianas Newsletter No. 20. Compiled and edited by B. Torke New York Botanical Garden, New York, USA 2 CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. MEETING PROGRAM .................................................................................................... 5 3. SYMPOSIUM PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS ............................................................... 7 4. MINUTES OF THE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING ....................................................