DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework: Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework: Draft Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Draft for consultation October 2016 BOLTON MANCHESTER ROCHDALE STOCKPORT TRAFFORD BURY OLDHAM SALFORD TAMESIDE WIGAN 1 Introduction 4 2 Vision and Strategy 11 3 Strategic locations 15 4 Delivering a successful Greater Manchester 42 5 Industrial and warehousing 44 6 Offices 49 7 Retail, leisure and tourism 52 8 Housing 54 9 Accessibility 58 10 Green Infrastructure 64 11 Nature conservation 67 12 Trees and woodland 69 13 The uplands 70 14 The lowland wetlands 72 15 River valleys and canals 74 16 Green Belt 76 17 Recreation 79 18 Carbon emissions 80 19 Resilience 82 20 Air Quality 84 21 Flood risk and water quality 86 22 Design 88 23 Heritage 90 24 Education, skills and knowledge 92 25 Health 94 26 Social inclusion 96 27 Infrastructure 97 28 Allocations 101 BOLTON MANCHESTER ROCHDALE STOCKPORT TRAFFORD BURY OLDHAM SALFORD TAMESIDE WIGAN 2 Introduction BOLTON MANCHESTER ROCHDALE STOCKPORT TRAFFORD BURY OLDHAM SALFORD TAMESIDE WIGAN 1 Introduction 1.1 Why are we producing a Greater Manchester Spatial Framework? 1.1.1 Greater Manchester is starting to show real and sustained growth in jobs and population but we still perform below the national average in terms of productivity and growth and there are still too many places within Greater Manchester which have weak economic performance. The Northern Powerhouse seeks to address this imbalance and Greater Manchester – as a leading City Region - is fundamental to its success. 1.1.2 Greater Manchester is on a transformative journey – we are actively promoting a strategy for growth across the whole of Greater Manchester providing opportunities for investment in areas where we have genuine competitive advantages and for the acceleration of growth in those areas where economic activity is weakest. Even with the success of this strategy we will need to do a lot more to ensure that none of our residents are left behind. 1.1.3 We need to manage growth so that Greater Manchester is a better place to live, work and visit. It is our aspiration that Greater Manchester becomes as well known for the quality of its environment as for its economic success. Our Green Belt plays a role in this but there are important green spaces, parks, rivers and canals in the heart of our urban communities which are equally valuable. The protection and enhancement of our blue and green infrastructure is a central theme of our strategy. 1.1.4 We are preparing the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) to make sure that investment and growth in houses and jobs happens but also benefits our residents and makes Greater Manchester a better place to live and work. We need to be able to plan for schools, green spaces, roads and health facilities alongside new homes, offices and factories. If we don’t do this, it won’t happen. 1.1.5 The GMSF is an important part of our tool-kit which is designed to facilitate Greater Manchester’s capacity to deliver our full economic potential, and also to ensure that all parts of Greater Manchester and its residents fully share in that economic success. This means that those parts of Greater Manchester which are performing comparatively weakly should be supported to accelerate their growth so that none of our residents are left behind. 1.1.6 The GMSF in itself does not deliver development, rather it defines what may or may not be developed in particular locations. Through our radical devolution agenda we are developing and delivering ambitious plans to enhance the skills base and transform the health and well being of our population to maximise our ability to promote inclusive growth. We will continue to drive that growth through targeted support for those key sectors that will underpin the economy of Greater Manchester in the future and develop new investment models to shape places where people want to live, invest and work. There is a particular need for significant transport infrastructure to access both housing and employment sites and we are committed to aligning our transport strategy and programmes to support the growth in GMSF. BOLTON MANCHESTER ROCHDALE STOCKPORT TRAFFORD BURY OLDHAM SALFORD TAMESIDE WIGAN 4 1.2 What is the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework? 1.2.1 In August 2014 the 10 Local Planning Authorities in Greater Manchester (Bolton, Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford and Wigan) agreed to prepare a joint Development Plan Document to set out the approach to housing and employment land across Greater Manchester for the next 20 years. This is known as the Greater Manchester Spatial Development Framework (GMSF). 1.2.2 In November 2014 the first devolution agreement was agreed which provided for an elected Mayor with responsibility to produce a Spatial Strategy with the unanimous support of her/his Cabinet. 1.2.3 Following election of the Mayor in May 2017 part of the GMSF may become the Spatial Strategy and part will remain a joint development plan document to be adopted by the resolution of the full Councils of all 10 authorities 1.3 This Consultation 1.3.1 Two informal consultations have already taken place. The first, in November 2014 was on the scope of the plan and our initial evidence base, and the second in November 2015, was on the vision, strategy and strategic growth options. We also undertook a ‘Call for Sites’ exercise in November 2015. 1.3.2 Following the consultation in November 2015 we have taken all comments into account and reviewed our evidence, specifically challenges around our ambition for growth and what scale of growth we need to aim for to maximise our position as the engine of growth driving the Northern Powerhouse. 1.3.3 The economic forecast was updated (Accelerated Growth Scenario (AGS) 2015) and tested against a range of factors including the Northern Powerhouse Independent Economic Review; forecasts produced by the leading forecasting houses as well as Oxford Economics (Cambridge Econometrics and Experian); our assumptions around resident employment rate and the potential impacts of Brexit. We also undertook further work on population and household growth taking into account the 2014 SNPP (released May 2016) and the Sub National household projections (released July 2016). In line with our previous reports we modelled various scenarios using different household representation rates and also modelled the impact of the Government’s Local Plan Expert Group (LPEG) recommendations which were made in Spring 2016. 1.3.4 Having completed this additional work it was concluded that the ambition set out in the AGS 2015 whilst challenging, is robust and necessary to demonstrate our continuing role in driving growth in the north of England. The AGS 2015 also delivers on Greater Manchester’s ambition to increase the resident employment rate to ensure that more residents share in the benefits of economic growth. 1.3.5 This work was discussed by the Joint GMCA/AGMA Executive on the 26th August 2016, who agreed that the level of growth we should be planning for and testing through the GMSF BOLTON MANCHESTER ROCHDALE STOCKPORT TRAFFORD processBURY is: OLDHAM SALFORD TAMESIDE WIGAN 5 GVA growth of 2.5% year on year, giving an uplift of £5bn above baseline conditions by 2035; Additional 199,700 jobs; Population growth of 294,800, which translates into 227,200 net new homes. 1.3.6 On the basis of the evidence we have gathered and the responses to the consultations we are currently at the stage of preparing a draft plan and now want to consult with a wide range of stakeholders about the scope of the plan, our spatial strategy and our strategic policies and allocations. 1.3.7 This consultation meets the requirements of Regulation 18 (‘preparation of a local plan’) of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. 1.4 What does it cover? 1.4.1 This is the first time that we have prepared an overarching spatial plan for Greater Manchester since the Greater Manchester Structure Plan in 1981 although we have prepared two joint Development Plan documents over recent years, the Waste Plan and the Minerals Plan. The only other area to produce something of comparable scope is London. The GMSF is a different type of plan to the London Plan in that it is being jointly prepared by all 10 councils and provides not only the strategic context but also more detail around housing and employment land and the associated infrastructure required. The GMSF also includes site ‘allocations’ for sites proposed to be released from the Green Belt and will define a ‘new’ Green Belt boundary for Greater Manchester. The GMSF will; set out how Greater Manchester should develop over the next two decades up to the year 2035; identify the amount of new development that will come forward across the 10 districts, in terms of housing, offices, and industry and warehousing, and the main areas in which this will be focused; support the delivery of key infrastructure, such as transport and utilities; protect the important environmental assets across the conurbation; allocate sites for employment and housing outside of the urban area; define a new Green Belt boundary for Greater Manchester. 1.4.2 The GMSF comprises four sections. These are set out below. Vision and strategy 1.4.3 The vision builds on the Greater Manchester Strategy (GMS) and sets out how Greater Manchester is planning to meet levels of growth well above baseline forecasts. The GMSF supports long term prosperity as well as meeting short term needs and seeks to ensure that all places and all residents share in the benefits of growth at the same time as building a resilient Greater Manchester, improving our green infrastructure network, reducing carbon emissions, addressing air quality and reducing flood risk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (1202 Sq M) Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, Junction 10
    Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, Junction 10 M53, CH2 4HY High quality office accommodation 1,545 sq ft (144 sq m) to 12,940 sq ft (1202 sq m) Enter COLISEUM RETAIL PARK McDONALD’S CHESHIRE OAKS M53 MARKS & SPENCER SAINSBURYS HARLEY DAVIDSON Aerial Location MITCHELL GROUP LEXUS Description B5132 J10 Availability Terms A5117 Contact EPC Certificates Download Print Exit A5058 TO THE NORTH Location 10/21A M57 TO MANCHESTER 1 LIVERPOOL AND THE EAST The Oaks Office Park occupies a highly MERSEY TUNNELS 6/1 M62 BIRKENHEAD prominent position off Stanney Mill Road, A5300 WARRINGTON MANCHESTER AIRPORT immediately adjacent to Junction 10 of A561 WIDNES M53 RUNCORN BRIDGE 9/20/20A the M53 mid Wirral motorway and less N A41 LIVERPOOL JOHN RUNCORN LENNONAIRPORT than 1 mile from the M56/M53 M56 A49 interchange. Ellesmere Port and Chester A533 M6 are approximately 1 mile and 7 miles ELLESMERE PORT A550 away respectively. NORTHWICH 11/15 A533 There are a wide range of amenities A5517 A54 A56 A55 QUEENSFERRY 12 available at Cheshire Oaks including the WINSFORD TO NORTH WALES CHESTER Designer Outlet Village, the new Marks & & ANGLESEY BIRMINGHAM Spencer, Coliseum Leisure Park and the AND THE A51 SOUTH A55 Travel Lodge hotel. All are readily A494 A530 accessible from the Oaks Office Park RUTHIN A483 A51 being situated directly opposite on the CREWE A534 western side of the motorway, also served by J10. NANTWICH M53 A41 STANNEY MILL ROAD WREXHAM CHESHIRE OAKS COLISEUM WAY TO SNOWDONIA NATIONAL PARK A530 A529 STANNEY MILL LANE Aerial COLISEUM Drive Times CHESHIRE Location OAKS WAY Destination Distance Drive Time COLISEUM WAY (miles) (minutes) Description A5117 B5132 J10 Availability M56 motorway 1 2 LONGLOOMS ROAD BLUE STANNEY LANE PLANET Chester 7 10 AQUARIUM BLUE A5117 Terms PLANE M6 motorway 20 25 AQUARIUM Contact Liverpool Airport 23 32 M53 Manchester Airport 30 25 EPC Certificates Download Print Exit Description The development comprises a two storey terrace providing four self-contained office buildings with ample car parking.
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultation Report – December 2015
    Public Consultation Report – December 2015 M6 Junction 10 Improvements Contents Section Title Page/s 1 Introduction 3-5 1.1 Main Objectives 3 1.2 Scheme Options 4 1.3 Project Timescale 5 2 Consultation exercise 6-9 2.1 Overview 6-7 2.2 Promoting the consultation 8 2.3 Questionnaires 9 3 Questionnaire results and analysis 10-18 3.1 Travel behaviour 10-12 3.2 Proposed improvement 13-18 4.0 Conclusion 19 5.0 Further information - contact details 20 6.0 Appendices 21 2 1.0 Introduction Walsall Council is working in partnership with Highways England to improve Junction 10 of the M6 motorway (M6J10). As a busy route between Walsall and Wolverhampton, the junction is often heavily congested and this reduces the attractiveness of the local area for business and investment, including within the nearby Black Country Enterprise Zone. Walsall Council and Highways England are developing plans to provide a long term improvement to M6 Junction 10. The non-statutory public consultation events held in December 2015 presented the current scheme options and sought comments and feedback to inform the final decision and help shape the design. 1.1 Main objectives of the scheme There are three main objectives of the M6J10 scheme. The first objective is to reduce congestion. By improving M6J10, congestion can be reduced on the A454 Black Country Route eastbound to improve journey time reliability. This is critical to the needs of local residents, businesses and the 120 hectares of developable land within the nearby Black Country Enterprise Zone. Congestion can be reduced on other roads linking to the junction, such as A454 Wolverhampton Road, B4464 Wolverhampton Road West and Bloxwich Lane, reducing ‘rat-running’ traffic on nearby routes parallel to the A454 Black Country Route, the A454 Wolverhampton Road and the B4464 Wolverhampton Road West.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report
    Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report February 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank January 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Infrastructure Planning Trans-Pennine Upgrade PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Author: Various Version Date Status of Version Rev 1.0 26.01.18 Initial Draft Rev 2.0 02.02.18 Final Draft Rev 3.0 07.02.18 Final Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to the Scheme and this Report .............................................................. 1 1.2 The Consenting Process ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Structure of this PEIR ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Responding to Consultation ...................................................................................... 3 1.6 Pre-Application Consultation Programme ................................................................. 3 2 THE SCHEME ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Options Topic Papers
    Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Joint Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document Issues and Options Topic Papers February 2012 Strategic Planning Tameside MBC Room 5.16, Council Offices Wellington Road Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 6DL Tel: 0161 342 3346 Email: [email protected] For a summary of this document in Gujurati, Bengali or Urdu please contact 0161 342 8355 It can also be provided in large print or audio formats Local Development Framework – Core Strategy Issues and Options Discussion Paper Topic Paper 1 – Housing 1.00 Background • Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) • Regional Spatial Strategy North West • Planning for Growth, March 2011 • Manchester Independent Economic Review (MIER) • Tameside Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) • Tameside Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 (SHMA) • Tameside Unitary Development Plan 2004 • Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 • Tameside Sustainable Community Strategy 2009-2019 • Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment • Tameside Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 1.01 The Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 is underpinned by a range of studies and evidence based reports that have been produced to respond to housing need at a local level as well as reflecting the broader national and regional housing agenda. 2.00 National Policy 2.01 At the national level Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) sets out the planning policy framework for delivering the Government's housing objectives setting out policies, procedures and standards which Local Planning Authorities must adhere to and use to guide local policy and decisions. 2.02 The principle aim of PPS3 is to increase housing delivery through a more responsive approach to local land supply, supporting the Government’s goal to ensure that everyone has the opportunity of living in decent home, which they can afford, in a community where they want to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Katrina Keddie Report Warrington Transport Summary 2017-04-11
    Warrington Transport Summary Part I: Overview Warrington Borough Council Project Number: 60433165 April 2017 Warrington Transport Summary Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Katrina Keddie Tom Marsden David Arthur Consultant Associate Director Regional Director Part I: Warrington Transport Summary - Overview Part II: Warrington Transport Summary – Evidence Base Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 1.0 12/05/2017 Initial working draft (v0.1) TCM Tom Marsden Associate Director revised following receipt of comments from client 2.0 21/06/2017 Final version TCM Tom Marsden Associate Director Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council AECOM Warrington Transport Summary Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council Prepared by: Katrina Keddie Consultant AECOM Limited 1 New York Street Manchester M1 4HD UK T: +44 161 601 1700 aecom.com © 2017 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Warrington Borough Council AECOM Warrington Transport Summary Table of Contents Summary of Transport and Travel
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1984
    Summary of fishery statistics, 1984 Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 24/09/2021 19:31:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/24904 Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1984 ISSN 0144-9141 SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS, 1984 CONTESTS 1. Catch Statistics 1.1 Rod and line catches (from licence returns) 1.1.1 Salmon 1.1.2 Migratory Trout 1.2 . Commercial catches 1.2.1 Salmon 1.2.2 Migratory Trout 2. Fish Culture and Hatchery Operations 2.1 Brood fish collection 2.2 Hatchery operations and salmon and sea trout stocking 2.2.1 Holmwrangle Hatchery 2.2.1.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.1.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.2 Middleton Hatchery 2.2.2.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.2.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.3 Langcliffe Hatchery 2.2.3.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.3.2 Salmon and sea trout planting - 1 - Restocking with Trout and Freshwater Fish 3.1 Non-migratory trout 3.1.1 Stocking by Angling Associations etc. and Fish Farms 3.1.2. Stocking by N.W.W.A. 3.1.2.1 North Cumbria 3.1.2.2 South Cumbria/North Lancashire 3.1.2.3 South Lancashire 3.1.2.4 Mersey and Weaver 3.2 Freshwater Fish 3.2.1 Stocking by Angling Associations, etc 3.2.2 Fish transfers carried out by N.W.W.A. 3.2.2.1 Northern Area 3.2.2.2 Southern Area - South Lancashire 3.2.2.3 Southern Area - Mersey and Weaver 3.2.3 Fish Grants from N.W.W.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies That Are Currently Providing Mecs
    Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies that are currently providing MECs Name Address Telephone 169 Mossley Road, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 Adams Pharmacy 6NE 0161 339 8889 Stalybridge Resource Centre, 2 Waterloo Road, Stalybridge. Adams Pharmacy SK15 2AU 0161 303 8599 Alipharma Ltd Thornley House Med Ctr) 11 Thornley Street, Hyde SK14 1JY 0161 351 1386 Asda Cavendish Street, Ashton Under Lyne, OL6 7DP 0161 342 6610 Asda Water Street, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 1BD 0161 882 5700 22 Stockport Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL7 Ashton Pharmacy 0LB 0161 330 4389 Ashton Primary Care Centre Pharmacy 193 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 7SR 0161 820 8281 Audenshaw Pharmacy 3 Chapel Street, Audenshaw, Manchester, M34 5DE 0161 320 9123 Boots 116-118 Station Road, Hadfield, Glossop SK13 1AJ 01457 853635 Hattersley Health Centre, Hattersley Road East, Hattersley, Boots Hyde SK14 3EH 0161 368 8498 Boots 72 Market Street, Droylsden, Manchester M43 6DE 0161 370 1626 Boots 30 Concorde Way, Dukinfield, Cheshire SK16 4DB 0161 330 3586 Boots 173 Mossley Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6NE 0161 330 1303 Boots 1-3 Bow Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6BU 0161 330 1746 Boots UK Ltd 15-17 Staveleigh Way, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 7JL 0161 308 2326 Boots UK Ltd 19 High Street West, Glossop, Derbyshire SK13 8AL 01457 852011 Boots UK Ltd 1A Market Place, Hyde, Cheshire SK14 2LX 0161 368 2249 Boots UK Ltd 33 Queens Walk, Droylsden, Manchester M43 7AD 0161 370 1402 Crown Point North, Retail Park, Ashton Road, Denton M34
    [Show full text]
  • 09.01.07 Transport Locality Assessment
    November 2020 Transport Locality Assessments Introductory Note and Assessments – Cross-boundary allocations GMSF 2020 Table of contents 1. Background 2 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 2 1.2 Policy Context – The National Planning Policy Framework 3 1.3 Policy Context – Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 5 1.4 Structure of this Note 9 2. Site Selection 10 2.1 The Process 10 2.2 Greater Manchester Accessibility Levels 13 3. Approach to Strategic Modelling 15 4. Approach to Technical Analysis 17 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Approach to identifying Public Transport schemes 18 4.3 Mitigations and Scheme Development 19 5. Conclusion 23 6. GMSF Allocations List 24 Appendix A - GMA1.1 Northern Gateway - Heywood / Pilsworth Locality Assessment A1 Appendix B - GMA1.2 Northern Gateway - Simister and Bowlee Locality Assessment B1 Appendix C - GMA2 Stakehill Locality Assessment C1 Appendix D - GMA3.1 Roundthorn Medipark Extension and GMA3.2 Timperley Wedge Locality Assessment D1 1 1. Background 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 1.1.1 The GMSF is a joint plan of all ten local authorities in Greater Manchester, providing a spatial interpretation of the Greater Manchester Strategy which will set out how Greater Manchester should develop over the next two decades up to the year 2037. It will: ⚫ identify the amount of new development that will come forward across the 10 Local Authorities, in terms of housing, offices, and industry and warehousing, and the main areas in which this will be focused; ⚫ ensure we have an appropriate supply of land to meet this need; ⚫ protect the important environmental assets across the conurbation; ⚫ allocate sites for employment and housing outside of the urban area; ⚫ support the delivery of key infrastructure, such as transport and utilities; ⚫ define a new Green Belt boundary for Greater Manchester.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Indicators 37 (2014) 287–303
    Ecological Indicators 37 (2014) 287–303 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Indicators journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind Trends in the hydrochemistry of acid-sensitive surface waters in the UK 1988–2008 D.T. Monteith a,∗, C.D. Evans b, P.A. Henrys a, G.L. Simpson c, I.A. Malcolm d a Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK b Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor, LL57 2UW, UK c Environmental Change Research Centre, Department of Geography, Pearson Building, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK d Marine Scotland Freshwater Laboratory, Faskally, Pitlochry, Perthshire, PH165LB, Scotland, UK article info abstract Keywords: We conducted complementary linear and non-linear statistical modelling of the first 20 years of hydro- Acidification chemical data from the 22 lakes and streams of the UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network (AWMN) in Recovery order to assess temporal patterns and rates of change in indicators of the key drivers of surface water Organic acids acidification and acidity status. Over the period 1988–2008, concentrations of non-marine sulphate (i.e. of Extremes anthropogenic origin) fell in line with reductions in non-marine sulphur deposition, the principal driver Buffering Climate of acidification. Most of the decline was confined to the latter half of the 1990s. Whilst these reductions Forestry were substantial, concentrations in recent samples from the most contaminated sites remained several − times higher than those in the most remote, low-deposition regions. Nitrate (NO3 ) concentrations also declined slightly at several sites in northern England and Wales, possibly reflecting a recent regional − reduction in N deposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 05/01/2011, 18.30
    Public Document Pack SOUTHPORT AREA COMMITTEE Date: Wednesday 5th January, 2011 Time: 6.30 pm Venue: Town Hall, Southport AREA COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP Ainsdale Ward Birkdale Ward Councillor Councillor Jones, Conservative Party Brodie - Browne, Liberal Democrats Porter, Conservative Party Hands (Chair), Liberal Democrats Preece, Liberal Democrats Shaw, Liberal Democrats Cambridge Ward Dukes Ward Councillor Councillor Glover, Conservative Party Byrom, The Labour Party McGuire, Liberal Democrats Pearson, Conservative Party Preston, Liberal Democrats Sir Ron Watson, Conservative Party Kew Ward Meols Ward Councillor Councillor Booth, Liberal Democrats Dodd, Liberal Democrats Weavers, Liberal Democrats D Rimmer, Liberal Democrats Tattersall, Liberal Democrats Norwood Ward Advisory Group Members Councillor Lord Fearn, Liberal Democrats Mr. J. Fairhurst Mr. S. Sugden B Rimmer (Vice-Chair), Liberal Democrats Mrs. M. Pointon Sumner, Liberal Democrats COMMITTEE OFFICER: Paul Fraser Telephone: 0151 934 2068 Fax: 0151 934 2034 E-mail: [email protected] If you have any special needs that may require arrangements to facilitate your attendance at this meeting, please contact the Committee Officer named above, who will endeavour to assist. A G E N D A (This first part of the meeting will take place in the Birkdale Room). 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Declarations of Interest Members and Officers are requested to give notice of any personal or prejudicial interest and the nature of that interest, relating to any item on the agenda in accordance with the relevant Code of Conduct 3. Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Pages 5 - 22) Minutes of the meeting held on 17 November 2010 Part A These items are for consultation or information of interest to the local communit y.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Prescott for Access to His Records Collected Since 1994 in the Kirklees Valley
    CONSERVE BATS, CONSERVE HERITAGE SURVEY OF BAT ACTIVITY OVER MILLPONDS IN SOUTH LANCASHIRE 2004 - 2006 Page Abstract 1 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 A History of the Kirklees Valley 5 1.2 Literature Review 9 2.0 Method 14 2.1 Preliminary Survey in the Kirklees Valley 14 2.2 Daylight Survey 15 2.3 Other Ponds and Water Bodies Included in the Survey 16 2.4 The Dusk Bat Survey 16 2.5 Comments on Method 18 3.0 Comments on Results 19 3.1 Species Distribution 19 3.1.1 Bats in the Kirklees Valley 19 3.1.2 Species Richness in the Valley 20 3.1.3 Changes in Bat activity Over Time 20 3.2 Graphical Representation of Bat Activity through the Valley 22 3.3 Summary of Rarer Species 23 3.4 Differences in Bat Activity between Individual Ponds 24 3.4.1 Possible Factors Affecting Bat Activity 24 3.5 Other Survey Sites 26 4.0 Conclusions 28 4.1 The Kirklees Valley 28 4.2 Other Survey Sites 28 4.2.1 Wigan Flashes 29 4.2.2 Yarrow Valley 30 4.2.3 Jumbles 31 4.2.4 Philips Park Whitefield 33 4.2.5 Redisher Wood, Ramsbottom 34 4.2.6 Starmount Lodges, Bury 35 Page 4.2.7 Parkers and Whitehead Lodges, Ainsworth 36 4.2.8 Healey Dell Rochdale 37 4.2.9 East Lancashire Paper Mill, Radcliffe 38 4.2.10 Cliviger Ponds, Todmorden 40 4.2.11 Burrs Country Park 41 4.2.12 Moses Gate Country Park Farnworth 42 4.2.13 Pilsworth Fisheries 43 4.2.14 Whitley Reservoir Wigan 44 4.2.15 Worsley Canal Basin 45 4.2.16 Hollins Vale, Bury 47 4.2.17 Pyramid Park, Bury 48 4.2.18 Haigh Hall Wigan 49 4.2.19 Island Lodge Surrounding area 50 4.2.19.1How Important are Ponds? 50 4.3 Sites Surveyed Less
    [Show full text]