DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenneth S. Stern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kenneth S. Stern I" 6 A \ ^ i OO V How It Is the Same, How It Is Different, and How to Fight It CD =3 CD OO (•» CD Kenneth S. Stern AJC AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE The American Jewish Committee protects the rights and freedoms of Jews the world over; combats bigotry and anti-Semitism and promotes human rights for all; works for the security of Israel and deepened understanding between Americans and Israelis; advocates public policy positions rooted in American democratic values and the perspectives of the Jewish heritage; and enhances the cre- ative vitality of the Jewish people. Founded in 1906, it is the pioneer human-relations agency in the United States. ANTISEM TISM How It Is the Same, How It Is Different, and How to Fight It Kenneth S. Stern AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE To Margie, Daniel, and Emily In memory of James O. Freedman (1935-2006) A wonderful human being. Kenneth S. Stern has been the American Jewish Com- mittee's expert on antisemitism since 1989. Mr. Stern, an attorney, has testified before Congress, argued before the United States Supreme Court, and was an invited pre- senter at the White House Conference on Hate Crimes. Other books by Kenneth S. Stern: Holocaust Denial (1993) Loud Hawk: The United States vs. The American Indian Movement (1994) A Force Upon the Plain: The American Militia Movement and the Politics of Hate (1996) ISBN 0-87495-140-2 Copyright © 2006 American Jewish Committee All Rights Reserved December 2006 Contents Foreword v Introduction 1 Chapter One: What Is Antisemitism? 7 Chapter Two: An Old Hatred in New Circumstances 15 Chapter Three: Durban— Antisemitism as Anti-Racism 23 Chapter Four: 9/11 43 Chapter Five: Antisemitism in the Arab and Muslim Worlds 55 Chapter Six: Antisemitism in Europe 70 Chapter Seven: Denial of the Holocaust 78 Chapter Eight: Crafting a AntisemitisWorking Definitiom for Todayn of Contemporars Monitors y 96 Chapter Nine: Combating Antisemitism— The Importance of Strategic, Venue-Specific Thinking 107 Chapter Ten: United States Campuses 118 iii / iv Contents Chapter Eleven: The Danger of Relying on Old, Unproven Gauges and Answers 136 Chapter Twelve: Looking Ahead in the United States 149 Chapter Thirteen: Conclusion 163 Acknowledgments 170 Notes 172 Index 203 Foreword In February of 1906, in the aftermath of a series of pogroms in Europe, a group of prominent American Jews met in New York and discussed what they could do about rising antisemitism. From this meeting emerged the American Jewish Committee, Americas oldest human-relations organization. While AJC s mission has broadened in its 100 years to include combating all forms of bigotry and promoting democratic values glob- ally, antisemitism has remained one of its core concerns, and I have been honored to be its expert on this subject since 1989. I grew up in the 1950s and 1960s in New York, where anti- semitism was not a major problem that I encountered personally. There were minor irritants, such as the teacher at my private middle school who chastised me for not saying the Lord's Prayer or singing Christian hymns during chapel. But these were years when the evening news showed blacks in the South being doused with fire hoses, beaten, even killed. That was true hatred and bigotry. By comparison, my teacher was merely an annoyance. I first experienced antisemitism in the late 1970s and 1980s. I was living in Portland, Oregon, working as a trial and appellate attor- ney. A right-wing group called the Posse Comitatus was particularly active, distributing antisemitic literature (with fraudulent quotations purporting to be from Benjamin Franklin and George Washington) in Portland's Multnomah County Courthouse. While these people seemed like buffoons, they were no laughing matter, as various Posse members from different parts of the country were soon charged with criminal and violent activities. V vi Antisemitism Today One April a local neo-Nazi group identified every Jewish family in an Oregon college town and mailed each of them a hateful card on Hitler's birthday. I offered whatever help—legal or otherwise—I could, but I wondered: How should the community respond to such hatred? Ignore it? Program against it? I did not know, but I was certain that the answer from a professional in the Jewish community—telling the people in the small town not to worry because there were fewer card-carrying members of the Ku Klux Klan that year than in the year before—was not sufficient. More troubling was the antisemitism among my friends in "pro- gressive" circles. After Israel invaded Lebanon in the early 1980s, there were protests by the same people with whom I had worked on a wide range of issues, from combating police brutality and homelessness to promoting tenants' rights and American Indian sovereignty. I too was critical of the Israeli government's actions, but some of the Israel- related literature I saw at the rallies was eerily reminiscent of the mate- rial the Posse had been distributing about Jews, with assertions of Jew- ish power, Jewish conspiracy, and ingrained Jewish venom toward non-Jews. Yet while the Posse would not take offense if someone said they were antisemitic, my friends on the left did not even want to dis- cuss the matter. To do so, they alleged, would be a distraction from the "real" work and would harm the progressive agenda. This reaction bothered me for a number of reasons. First, this refusal to discuss a serious issue came from friends and allies who were eager to discuss just about everything else. Second, it showed that many on the left had a politically driven, as opposed to an analytical, understanding of how bigotry worked. And, third, it proved that combating anti- semitism was not easily done. When I joined the AJC staff a few years later, it was not to bean- count swastikas or dissect the ramblings of the hateful fringe, but rather to focus on how key institutions react to, and can be empow- ered to counteract, bigotry in general and antisemitism in particular. I had been a lay member of the American Jewish Committee chapter in Foreword vii Portland and was impressed that AJC was not driven by hysteria about antisemitism or any other issue, but was committed to careful research and honest and respectful debate. I published booklets about and con- ducted programs on how to combat bigotry on campus, in the media, and in politics. I also wrote in-depth background pieces about the antisemites who were getting some level of traction—people such as David Duke, Louis Farrakhan, and Pat Buchanan, and movements such as skinheads, the militias, and Holocaust deniers. In the summer of 2000, I decided that it was time to begin a book about contemporary antisemitism. Some well-respected col- leagues and pundits had been arguing in the late 1990s that anti- semitism was "dead." They asserted that Jews had unprecedented acceptance in American society, with Jews welcomed on boards of major corporations and serving as presidents of Ivy League universities that had, not too many decades ago, used quotas to restrict the num- ber of Jewish students. Further, they pointed to the high rate of Jew- ish-gentile intermarriage. If Americans were willing to have Jews in their families, so much so that Jews worried about the basics of Jewish continuity, how bad could antisemitism be? I agreed with their view that we American Jews were in a "golden age," but I thought it dangerous to declare that antisemitism was a thing of the past. It was, rather, a very well-established hatred, and there were new lies—such as Holocaust denial—and recurrent politi- cal needs, especially in and related to the Middle East, that were likely to breathe new life into antisemitism in the years ahead. At the least, I thought it only responsible to take advantage of these good times to plan how to counteract antisemitism in the future, rather than to declare victory and ignore a problem with a 2,000-year history. The collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process in the fall of 2000, sure enough, was followed by increased antisemitism in Europe and an escalation in anti-Israel activity that frequently smelled of anti- semitism. There has been much written describing a renewed (some say "new") antisemitism in the last few years, but little about how we viii Antisemitism Today must evaluate what should be done about it, and the logical and nec- essary prior step: whether we need to reevaluate how we think about it. It is hard to imagine what the group of American Jews, meeting in 1906, would make of the great acceptance of Jews in American society today and the established role of Jewish organizations working to combat antisemitism and bigotry. But the questions they raised 100 years ago—how to gauge the problems, how to respond effectively, how to find allies and really change things for the better—are at least as pressing today as they were then. This book is an effort, not necessarily to provide the right answers, but more urgently to help ensure that those who care about combating antisemitism are asking intelligent and relevant questions, and not defaulting into comfortable but too often unproved and per- haps ineffective answers. Kenneth S. Stern New York, NY July 19, 2006 The increasing frequency and severity of anti-Semitic incidents since the start of the twenty-first century, particularly in Europe, has compelled the international community to focus on anti-Semitism with renewed vigor. " Report on Global Anti-Semitism," U.S. State Department, January 5, 2005 Introduction Despite resistance from some in the United States Department of State, President George W.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spencer Sunshine*
    Journal of Social Justice, Vol. 9, 2019 (© 2019) ISSN: 2164-7100 Looking Left at Antisemitism Spencer Sunshine* The question of antisemitism inside of the Left—referred to as “left antisemitism”—is a stubborn and persistent problem. And while the Right exaggerates both its depth and scope, the Left has repeatedly refused to face the issue. It is entangled in scandals about antisemitism at an increasing rate. On the Western Left, some antisemitism manifests in the form of conspiracy theories, but there is also a hegemonic refusal to acknowledge antisemitism’s existence and presence. This, in turn, is part of a larger refusal to deal with Jewish issues in general, or to engage with the Jewish community as a real entity. Debates around left antisemitism have risen in tandem with the spread of anti-Zionism inside of the Left, especially since the Second Intifada. Anti-Zionism is not, by itself, antisemitism. One can call for the Right of Return, as well as dissolving Israel as a Jewish state, without being antisemitic. But there is a Venn diagram between anti- Zionism and antisemitism, and the overlap is both significant and has many shades of grey to it. One of the main reasons the Left can’t acknowledge problems with antisemitism is that Jews persistently trouble categories, and the Left would have to rethink many things—including how it approaches anti- imperialism, nationalism of the oppressed, anti-Zionism, identity politics, populism, conspiracy theories, and critiques of finance capital—if it was to truly struggle with the question. The Left understands that white supremacy isn’t just the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis, but that it is part of the fabric of society, and there is no shortcut to unstitching it.
    [Show full text]
  • HOLOCAUST DENIAL IS a FORM of HATE SPEECH Raphael Cohen
    HOLOCAUST DENIAL IS A FORM OF HATE SPEECH ∗∗∗ Raphael Cohen-Almagor Introduction Recently Facebook confirmed that it has disabled a group called ‘I Hate Muslims in Oz.’ Barry Schnitt explained: “We disabled the ‘I Hate Muslims in Oz’ group… because it contained an explicit statement of hate. Where Holocaust-denial groups have done this and been reported, we’ve taken the same action”.1 Facebook distinguishes between ‘explicit statement of hate’ and Holocaust denial. Its directors believe that Holocaust denial is not hateful per se and does not therefore contravene the company’s terms of service. The terms of service say: “You will not post content that is hateful, threatening, pornographic, or that contains nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence”. 2 Schnitt said: “We’re always discussing and evaluating our policies on reported content, but have no plans to change this policy at this time. In addition to discussing it internally, we continue to engage with third-party experts on the issue”.3 In this short piece I wish to take issue with the assertion that Holocaust denial is not hateful per se . My aim is to show that it is, and therefore that Facebook should reconsider its position. All Internet providers and web- hosting companies whose terms of service disallow hateful messages on their servers should not host or provide forums for such hate-mongering. This is of urgent need as Holocaust denial is prevalent in Europe, the United States (USA) and across the Arab and Muslim parts of the world. Iran’s regime, under the disputed leadership of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has made questioning the Holocaust one of the centerpieces of its radical ∗ Educator, researcher and human rights activist.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine
    www.doew.at Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: The Evolution of a Doctrine Published in: Hermann Kurthen/Rainer Erb/Werner Bergmann (ed.), Anti-Sem- itism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification, New York–Oxford 1997 Development of “revisionism” since 1945 Most people understand so called „revisionism“ as just another word for the movement of holocaust denial (Benz 1994; Lipstadt 1993; Shapiro 1990). Therefore it was suggested lately to use the word „negationism“ instead. How- ever in the author‘s point of view „revisionism“ covers some more topics than just the denying of the National Socialist mass murders. Especially in Germany and Austria there are some more points of National Socialist politics some people have tried to minimize or apologize since 1945, e. g. the responsibility for World War II, the attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 (quite a modern topic), (the discussion) about the number of the victims of the holocaust a. s. o.. In the seventies the late historian Martin Broszat already called that movement „run- ning amok against reality“ (Broszat 1976). These pseudo-historical writers, many of them just right wing extremist publishers or people who quite rapidly turned to right wing extremists, really try to prove that history has not taken place, just as if they were able to make events undone by denying them. A conception of “negationism” (Auerbach 1993a; Fromm and Kernbach 1994, p. 9; Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz 1994) or “holocaust denial” (Lipstadt 1993, p. 20) would neglect the additional components of “revision- ism”, which are logically connected with the denying of the holocaust, this being the extreme variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe
    Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe Michael Shafir Motto: They used to pour millet on graves or poppy seeds To feed the dead who would come disguised as birds. I put this book here for you, who once lived So that you should visit us no more Czeslaw Milosz Introduction* Holocaust denial in post-Communist East Central Europe is a fact. And, like most facts, its shades are many. Sometimes, denial comes in explicit forms – visible and universally-aggressive. At other times, however, it is implicit rather than explicit, particularistic rather than universal, defensive rather than aggressive. And between these two poles, the spectrum is large enough to allow for a large variety of forms, some of which may escape the eye of all but the most versatile connoisseurs of country-specific history, culture, or immediate political environment. In other words, Holocaust denial in the region ranges from sheer emulation of negationism elsewhere in the world to regional-specific forms of collective defense of national "historic memory" and to merely banal, indeed sometime cynical, attempts at the utilitarian exploitation of an immediate political context.1 The paradox of Holocaust negation in East Central Europe is that, alas, this is neither "good" nor "bad" for the Jews.2 But it is an important part of the * I would like to acknowledge the support of the J. and O. Winter Fund of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York for research conducted in connection with this project. I am indebted to friends and colleagues who read manuscripts of earlier versions and provided comments and corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Internet Und Die Leugnung Des Holocaust
    Bei dieser Arbeit handelt es sich um eine Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit, die an der Universität Kassel angefertigt wurde. Die hier veröffentlichte Version kann von der als Prüfungsleistung eingereichten Version geringfügig abweichen. Weitere Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeiten finden Sie hier: https://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2011040837235 Diese Arbeit wurde mit organisatorischer Unterstützung des Zentrums für Lehrerbildung der Universität Kassel veröffentlicht. Informationen zum ZLB finden Sie unter folgendem Link: www.uni-kassel.de/zlb Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit im Rahmen der Ersten Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien im Fach Geschichte Eingereicht dem Amt für Lehrerbildung Prüfungsstelle Kassel Thema: „Das Internet und die Leugnung des Holocaust. Neue Perspektiven in deutschsprachigen Veröffentlichungen“ Vorgelegt von: Dennis Beismann 2011 Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Friedhelm Boll Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung............................................................................................................1 1.1 Stand der Forschung.....................................................................................3 1.1.1 Publikationen aus den Jahren 1970 bis 1993........................................3 1.1.2 Holocaustleugnende Publikationen im Internet....................................4 1.2 Anlage der Studie.........................................................................................7 1.2.1 Fragestellung.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptions of Terror(Ism) and the “Other” During The
    CONCEPTIONS OF TERROR(ISM) AND THE “OTHER” DURING THE EARLY YEARS OF THE RED ARMY FACTION by ALICE KATHERINE GATES B.A. University of Montana, 2007 B.S. University of Montana, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures 2012 This thesis entitled: Conceptions of Terror(ism) and the “Other” During the Early Years of the Red Army Faction written by Alice Katherine Gates has been approved for the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures _____________________________________ Dr. Helmut Müller-Sievers _____________________________________ Dr. Patrick Greaney _____________________________________ Dr. Beverly Weber Date__________________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Gates, Alice Katherine (M.A., Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures) Conceptions of Terror(ism) and the “Other” During the Early Years of the Red Army Faction Thesis directed by Professor Helmut Müller-Sievers Although terrorism has existed for centuries, it continues to be extremely difficult to establish a comprehensive, cohesive definition – it is a monumental task that scholars, governments, and international organizations have yet to achieve. Integral to this concept is the variable and highly subjective distinction made by various parties between “good” and “evil,” “right” and “wrong,” “us” and “them.” This thesis examines these concepts as they relate to the actions and manifestos of the Red Army Faction (die Rote Armee Fraktion) in 1970s Germany, and seeks to understand how its members became regarded as terrorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Elephant in the Room Usually Centres Around Israel”
    “The elephant in the room usually centres around Israel” A thematic analysis of how institutional and organisational actors understand and approach antisemitism in general and among Muslims in Sweden Master’s Programme in Social Work and Human Rights Degree Report: 30 higher education credits Autumn 2018 Author: Annemarie Ammer Supervisor: Ulf Borelius Abstract Working Title: “The elephant in the room usually centres around Israel” A thematic analysis of how institutional and organisational actors understand and approach antisemitism in general and among Muslims in Sweden Keywords: Thematic analysis, antisemitism, antisemitism among Muslims, organisational work The Master’s thesis deals with the topic of antisemitism in Sweden and, as an aspect of that, focuses on antisemitic attitudes among Muslims. Antisemitism, the hostility towards Jews, has changed its forms of manifestation throughout history, but persists to the current day. In Sweden, research on antisemitism remains limited, especially with focus on antisemitic attitudes among Muslims. This study seeks to contribute to a more detailed understanding of antisemitism in Sweden. The aim of the study was to describe and analyse how different institutional and organisational actors approach the topic of antisemitism and how they represent strategies to deal with antisemitism in general and/or among Muslims (specifically or in line with other forms of discrimination). Thereby, a social constructionist perspective was applied throughout the research. The interview material consists of eight semi-structured interviews with representatives of seven different organisations and projects, with the following research questions: How do the organisations construct antisemitism? How do the organisations represent their work and strategies to tackle antisemitism among Muslims? What discourses do the organisations draw on to construct the basis for their work? To answer these questions, a semi-structured interview guide served as framework for conducting the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Denial in Australia
    ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of Holocaust denial in Australia. It does so through a study of the beliefs and activities of the three organizations for whom Holocaust denial is a central belief: the Australian League of Rights, the Australian Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Adelaide Institute. Their activities, their international ties, and their relationship with the broader racist Right in Australia is considered. The paper concludes by reflecting on the future directions and responses to Holocaust denial. INTRODUCTION The nature of Australian Holocaust denial organizations, their activities, and their place in broader far Right circles is different from denial organizations in other countries. This is explained by the dominant role of the Australian League of Rights in far Right politics, the civil liberties origins of the Australian Civil Liberties Union, the lack of sizeable neo- Nazi groups in Australia, and the dominance of anti-Aboriginal and anti- Asian issues on the far Right agenda. In addition, unlike many European countries where denial is explained as a response to their wartime collaboration with the Nazis, this motive does not exist in Australia which fought against the Nazis and her allies. Although Holocaust denial is a fringe activity in Australia, it has significantly increased over the last two decades with a concomitant growth in collaboration between Australian and overseas Holocaust deniers. This is not just a Jewish concern for Holocaust deniers have become a leading element within the racist Right with whom they share a common worldview. This is because in addition to their antisemitism, Australian Holocaust deniers expound racist and xenophobic policies and views.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003
    Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the RAXEN Information Network Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the EUMC - RAXEN Information Network EUMC - Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 2 EUMC – Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Foreword Following concerns from many quarters over what seemed to be a serious increase in acts of antisemitism in some parts of Europe, especially in March/April 2002, the EUMC asked the 15 National Focal Points of its Racism and Xenophobia Network (RAXEN) to direct a special focus on antisemitism in its data collection activities. This comprehensive report is one of the outcomes of that initiative. It represents the first time in the EU that data on antisemitism has been collected systematically, using common guidelines for each Member State. The national reports delivered by the RAXEN network provide an overview of incidents of antisemitism, the political, academic and media reactions to it, information from public opinion polls and attitude surveys, and examples of good practice to combat antisemitism, from information available in the years 2002 – 2003. On receipt of these national reports, the EUMC then asked an independent scholar, Dr Alexander Pollak, to make an evaluation of the quality and availability of this data on antisemitism in each country, and identify problem areas and gaps. The country-by-country information provided by the 15 National Focal Points, and the analysis by Dr Pollak, form Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 of this report respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Demokratins Förgörare
    Demokratins förgörare Bim Clinell Stieg Larsson Hans Lindquist Anna-Lena Lodenius Heléne Lööw Marina Taloyan Demokratiutredningens skrift nr 28 SOU 1999:10 010Demok.p65 1 1999-11-17, 10:38 SOU och Ds som ingår i 1999 års nummerserie kan köpas från Fakta Info Direkt. För remissutsändningar av SOU och Ds som ingår i 1999 års nummerserie svarar Fakta Info Direkt på uppdrag av Regeringskansliets förvaltningsavdelning. Beställningsadress: Fakta Info Direkt, Kundservice Box 6430, 113 82 Stockholm Tel: 08-587 671 00, Fax: 08-587 671 71 E-post: [email protected] Omslagsbild: Gunnar Smoliansky, Bildhuset Grafisk formgivning: Susan Nilsson, Jupiter ISBN 91-7610-912-7 Elanders Gotab, Stockholm 1999 ISSN 0375-250X 010Demok.p65 2 1999-11-17, 10:38 Förord Innan den här dagen, den 30 november 1999, nått sitt slut, kom- mer svenska medborgare att manifestera sin avsikt att förgöra demokratin. De kommer att använda sig av sina grundlagsfästa demonstrations- och mötesfriheter för att bekämpa grundlagens etiska grundval och demokratiska teori. Med de följande analyserna av vår samtida främlingsfientlighet, rasism och nazism vill Demokratiutredningen höja medvetenheten om demokratins undergrävare bland dess mer eller mindre reflek- terande vänner. Vår förhoppning är att skriften skall bidra till att öka den svenska folkstyrelens intellektuella motståndskraft. Demokratiutredningens ledamöter har inte tagit ställning till skriftens innehåll. Erik Amnå Huvudsekreterare 3 . Innehåll Nynazismen – förtrupp eller eftersläntrare Hans Lindquist .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jews and Germans in Eastern Europe New Perspectives on Modern Jewish History
    Jews and Germans in Eastern Europe New Perspectives on Modern Jewish History Edited by Cornelia Wilhelm Volume 8 Jews and Germans in Eastern Europe Shared and Comparative Histories Edited by Tobias Grill An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org ISBN 978-3-11-048937-8 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-049248-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-048977-4 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Grill, Tobias. Title: Jews and Germans in Eastern Europe : shared and comparative histories / edited by/herausgegeben von Tobias Grill. Description: [Berlin] : De Gruyter, [2018] | Series: New perspectives on modern Jewish history ; Band/Volume 8 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018019752 (print) | LCCN 2018019939 (ebook) | ISBN 9783110492484 (electronic Portable Document Format (pdf)) | ISBN 9783110489378 (hardback) | ISBN 9783110489774 (e-book epub) | ISBN 9783110492484 (e-book pdf) Subjects: LCSH: Jews--Europe, Eastern--History. | Germans--Europe, Eastern--History. | Yiddish language--Europe, Eastern--History. | Europe, Eastern--Ethnic relations. | BISAC: HISTORY / Jewish. | HISTORY / Europe / Eastern. Classification: LCC DS135.E82 (ebook) | LCC DS135.E82 J495 2018 (print) | DDC 947/.000431--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018019752 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de.
    [Show full text]