Mississippi River – Sartell Monitoring and Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mississippi River – Sartell Monitoring and Assessment Report Watershed health July 2019 Mississippi River – Sartell Monitoring and Assessment Report Authors The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and Andrew Frank information to wider audience. Visit our Jordan Donatell, Cadie Olson, Ben Lundeen, Bruce Monson, Shawn Nelson, Michael Bourdaghs, website for more information. Sophia Vaughan, Anthony J. Dingmann, Phil MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- Votruba, Kara Fitzpatrick consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine Contributors/acknowledgements derivatives. Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | 651-296-6300 | 800-657-3864 | Or use your preferred relay service. | [email protected] This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us. Document number: wq-ws3-07010201b Contents Tables ............................................................................................................................................................ ii Figures .......................................................................................................................................................... iii List of acronyms ............................................................................................................................................ v Executive summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 The watershed monitoring approach ....................................................................................................... 4 Assessment methodology ......................................................................................................................... 8 Watershed overview ............................................................................................................................... 12 Watershed-wide data collection methodology ...................................................................................... 31 Individual aggregated HUC-12 subwatershed results ................................................................................. 35 Aggregated HUC-12 subwatersheds ....................................................................................................... 35 Upper Platte River HUC 0701020104-02 .................................................................... 36 Skunk River HUC 0701020103-01 .................................................................... 41 Hillman Creek HUC 0701020103-02 ..................................................................... 44 Lower Platte River HUC 0701020104-01 ..................................................................... 47 Little Rock Creek HUC 0701020105-01 ..................................................................... 51 City of Sartell – Mississippi River HUC 0701020107-01 ...................................................................... 56 North Two River HUC 0701020101-03 ...................................................................... 59 Two River HUC 0701020101-01 ...................................................................... 62 South Two River HUC 0701020101-02 ...................................................................... 65 Spunk Creek HUC 0701020102-01 ...................................................................... 70 Watab River HUC 0701020106-01....................................................................... 74 Watershed-wide results and discussion ..................................................................................................... 78 Stream water quality .............................................................................................................................. 78 Lake water quality .................................................................................................................................. 79 Fish contaminant results ......................................................................................................................... 79 Pollutant load monitoring ....................................................................................................................... 82 Stream flow ............................................................................................................................................. 89 Wetland condition .................................................................................................................................. 90 Transparency trends for the Mississippi River-Sartell watershed ........................................................... 98 Remote sensing for lakes in the Mississippi River-Sartell watershed ..................................................... 98 Priority waters for protection and restoration in the Mississippi River-Sartell Watershed .................. 100 Summaries and recommendations ........................................................................................................... 101 Literature cited.......................................................................................................................................... 104 Appendix 1 – Water chemistry definitions ............................................................................................ 107 Appendix 2.1 – Intensive watershed monitoring water chemistry stations in the Mississippi River – Sartell Watershed ................................................................................................................................. 108 Appendix 2.2 – Intensive watershed monitoring biological monitoring stations in the Mississippi River- Sartell Watershed ................................................................................................................................. 109 Appendix 3.1 – Minnesota statewide IBI thresholds and confidence limits ......................................... 112 Appendix 3.2 – Biological monitoring results – fish IBI (assessable reaches) [biologist] ...................... 113 Appendix 3.3 – Biological monitoring results-macroinvertebrate IBI (assessable reaches) [biologist] 117 Appendix 4.1 – Fish species found during biological monitoring surveys ............................................. 120 Appendix 4.2 – Macroinvertebrate species found during biological monitoring surveys ..................... 122 Appendix 5 – Minnesota Stream Habitat Assessment results .............................................................. 130 Appendix 6 – Lake protection and prioritization results ....................................................................... 134 Appendix 7 – Stream protection and prioritization results ................................................................... 136 i Tables Table 1. Tiered aquatic life use standards. ................................................................................................... 9 Table 2. Aquatic life and recreation assessments on stream reaches: Upper Platte River Aggregated HUC- 12. Reaches are organized upstream to downstream in the table............................................................. 36 Table 3. Lake assessments: Upper Platte River Aggregated HUC-12. ......................................................... 38 Table 4. Aquatic life and recreation assessments on stream reaches: Skunk River Aggregated HUC-12. Reaches are organized upstream to downstream in the table. ................................................................. 41 Table 5. Aquatic life and recreation assessments on stream reaches: Hillman Creek Aggregated HUC-12. Reaches are organized upstream to downstream in the table.[ ................................................................ 44 Table 6. Aquatic life and recreation assessments on stream reaches: Lower Platte River Aggregated HUC- 12. Reaches are organized upstream to downstream in the table............................................................. 47 Table 7. Lake assessments: Lower Platte River Aggregated HUC-12. ......................................................... 48 Table 8. Aquatic life and recreation assessments on stream reaches: Little Rock Creek Aggregated HUC- 12. Reaches are organized upstream to downstream in the table............................................................. 51 Table 9. Lake assessments: Little Rock Creek Aggregated HUC-12. ........................................................... 53 Table 10. Aquatic life and recreation assessments on stream reaches: City of Sartell – Mississippi River Aggregated HUC-12. Reaches are organized upstream to downstream in the table. ................................ 56 Table 11. Aquatic life and recreation assessments on stream reaches: North Two River Aggregated HUC- 12. Reaches are organized upstream to downstream in the table............................................................. 59 Table 12. Lake assessments: North Two River Aggregated HUC-12. .......................................................... 60 Table 13. Aquatic life and
Recommended publications
  • Options for Selectively Controlling Non-Indigenous Fish in the Upper Colorado River Basin
    Options for Selectively Controlling Non-Indigenous Fish in the Upper Colorado River Basin Draft Report June 1995 Leo D. Lentsch Native Fish and Herptile Coordinator Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Robert Muth Larval Fish Lab Colorado State University Paul D. Thompson Native Fish Biologist Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Dr. Todd A. Crowl Utah State University and Brian G. Hoskins Native Fish Technician Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Colorado River Fishery Project Salt Lake City, Utah TABLE OP CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT .......................... INTRODUCTION ...................... Non-Indigenous Problems ..... Objectives ................... Control Options ............. Mechanical Control ..... Chemical Control ....... Biological Control ..... Physicochemical Control METHODS .......................................................... Literature Review .......................................... Species Accounts ........................................... RESULTS .......................................................... Species Accounts ........................................... Clupeidae-Herrings ................................... Threadfin Shad .................................. Cyprinidae-Carps and Minnows ........................ Red Shiner ...................................... Common Carp ..................................... Utah Chub ........................................ Leathers ide Chub ................................ Brassy Minnow ................................... Plains Minnow
    [Show full text]
  • Water–Quality Assessment of the Eastern Iowa Basins—Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Suspended Sediment, and Organic Carbon in Surface
    Water–Quality Assessment of the Eastern Iowa Basins—Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Suspended Sediment, and Organic Carbon In Surface Water, 1996–98 NATIONAL WATER–QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Water-Resources Investigations Report 01–4175 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Technical Assistance James Giglierano, Iowa Geological Survey Bureau Robert Libra, Iowa Geological Survey Bureau Clint Beckert, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Dana Kolpin, U.S. Geological Survey Craig Harvey, U.S. Geological Survey Data Collection, Site Construction, Data Entry or Verification Jim Cerveny, U.S. Geological Survey Eric Sadorf, U.S. Geological Survey Debra Sneck-Fahrer, U.S. Geological Survey Matt Bobier, U.S. Geological Survey Jennifer Tobias, U.S. Geological Survey Joel Galloway, U.S. Geological Survey Jon Nania, U.S. Geological Survey Jim Klaus, U.S. Geological Survey Denise Montgomery, U.S. Geological Survey Jake Freier, U.S. Geological Survey Erik Smith, U.S. Geological Survey Bob Einhellig, U.S. Geological Survey Jeff Harms, U.S. Geological Survey Dave Conell, U.S. Geological Survey Joe Gorman, U.S. Geological Survey Al Conkling, U.S. Geological Survey Jim Sondag, U.S. Geological Survey Pat Lustgraaf, U.S. Geological Survey Mike Turco, U.S. Geological Survey Pat Sweeney, U.S. Geological Survey Daron Tanko, U.S. Geological Survey Editorial Review Lanna Combs, U.S. Geological Survey Technical Review Mary Skopec, Iowa Geological Survey Bureau Greg Nalley, U.S. Geological Survey Russell Dash, U.S. Geological Survey Patrick Edelmann, U.S. Geological Survey Robert Buchmiller, U.S. Geological Survey John O. Helgesen, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Assessment of the Eastern Iowa Basins—Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Suspended Sediment, and Organic Carbon in Surface Water, 1996–98 By Kent D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Distribution in Skunk River Drainage Above Ames
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 74 Annual Issue Article 20 1967 Fish Distribution in Skunk River Drainage above Ames Larry V. Zach Iowa State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1967 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Zach, Larry V. (1967) "Fish Distribution in Skunk River Drainage above Ames," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 74(1), 105-116. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol74/iss1/20 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zach: Fish Distribution in Skunk River Drainage above Ames Fish Distribution in Skunk River Drainage above Ames 1 LARRY v. ZACH 2 Abstract. From June 10 to November 17, 1966, 31 spe­ cies of fish were recorded from the Skunk River above Ames. Length frequencies indicate the seasonal growth of Notropis cornutus, N. lutrensis, Pimephales notatus, and P. promelas. Species associated with headwater, riffle, pool and main chan­ nel are listed. A flood-control darn has been proposed for the Skunk River north of Ames. Since such construction would result in changes in the fish distribution and species composition, the present dis­ tribution of fish is of particular interest. The study area consisted of the Skunk River drainage sjrstern, Hamilton and Story Counties, from the headwaters to' Ames, about 35 miles downstream (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota: a Sketch of Its History, by Alexius Hof
    Saint John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota: A Sketch of Its History, by Alexius Hof... Page 1 of 83 Saint John's University Archives > Saint John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota: A Sketch of Its History, by Alexius Hoffmann, OSB > Saint John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota: A Sketch of Its History, by Alexius Hoffmann, OSB Saint John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota: A Sketch of Its History, by Alexius Hoffmann, OSB PREFACE St. John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota: A Sketch of Its History by Alexius Hoffmann, OSB / published by Record Press, Collegeville, Minnesota, 1907. The following pages pretend to be no more than a sketch, in the form of annals, of the history of Saint John’s. As such it is merely a compilation of events that will serve as working material for the future historian. Most of the information was drawn from the annual catalogues the first of which was published in 1870; from the files of newspapers, such as Der Wanderer, of St. Paul, and the St. Cloud Daily Times; from the Saint John’s University Record, private diaries and personal recollections. If many of the happenings chronicled do not rise to the dignity of historical events, the writer’s excuse is that he has addressed himself primarily to the alumni of the institution, to whom the daily doings of college life are as interesting as the larger facts of history. For this reason too the forms of annals was chosen as a dress for the narrative. CHAPTER I Beginnings – The Saint Cloud Priory – Transfers – Final Location – 1856-1867 When, about the middle of last century, that part of central Minnesota lying west of the Mississippi was thrown open for settlement, such a stream of settlers poured in that in a short time the face of the primitive wilderness was changed.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject to Overflow: the History of Drainage Districts in Jasper County, Iowa
    SUBJECT TO OVERFLOW: THE HISTORY OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS IN JASPER COUNTY, lOWA A Thesis by JOSEPH W. OTTO Submitted to the Graduate School · Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2012 Department of History SUBJECT TO OVERFLOW: THE HISTORY OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS IN JASPER COUNTY, IOWA A Thesis by JOSEPH W. OTTO August 2012 APPROVED BY: Dr. Neva J. Specht Chairperson, Thesis Committee Dr. Lynne M. Getz Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Jeffrey D. Colby Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Lucinda M. McCray Chairperson, Department of History Dr. Edelma D. Huntley ... Dean, Research and Graduate Studies Copyright by Joseph W. Otto 2012 All Rights Reserved .... ABSTRACT SUBJECT TO OVERFLOW: THE HISTORY OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS IN JASPER COUNTY, lOWA Joseph W. Otto, B.S., Iowa State University M.A., East Carolina University M.A., Appalachian State University Chairperson: Dr. Neva J. Specht This project looks at the environmental changes wrought upon the South Skunk River in Jasper County, Iowa through stream channelization, or artificial straightening of a natural watercourse. Between 1912 and 1915 the Skunk River in Jasper County was straightened so that excess water in the lowlands could drain away more efficiently, making the river's perpetually wet and flood-prone riverbottom lands much more inclined to produce large yields of grain. Draining lowlands was accomplished through the local organization of a drainage district, which gave landowners a legal way to pursue large scale drainage projects. Technologically, a steam powered dredge boat physically altered the river's riparian environment. Large-scale drainage projects like the straightening ofthe ..
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Fishing Regulations
    www.iowadnr.gov/fishing 1 Contents What’s New? Be a Responsible Angler .....................................3 • Mississippi River walleye length limit License & Permit Requirements ..........................3 changes - length limits in Mississippi Threatened & Endangered Species ....................4 River Pools 12-20 now include the entire Health Benefits of Eating Fish .............................4 Mississippi River in Iowa (p. 12). General Fishing Regulations ...............................5 • Missouri River paddlefish season start Fishing Seasons & Limits ....................................9 date changed to Feb. 1 (p. 11) Fish Identification...............................................14 • Virtual fishing tournaments added to License Agreements with Bordering States .......16 Iowa DNR special events applications Health Advisories for Eating Fish.......................17 - the definition of fishing tournaments now Aquatic Invasive Species...................................18 includes virtual fishing tournaments (p. 6) Fisheries Offices Phone Numbers .....................20 First Fish & Master Angler Awards ....................21 Conservation Officers Phone Numbers .............23 License and Permit Fees License/Permit Resident Nonresident On Sale Dec. 15, 2020 On Sale Jan. 1, 2021 Annual 16 years old and older $22.00 $48.00 3-Year $62.00 Not Available 7-Day $15.50 $37.50 3-Day Not Available $20.50 1-Day $10.50 $12.00 Annual Third Line Fishing Permit $14.00 $14.00 Trout Fee $14.50 $17.50 Lifetime (65 years old and older) $61.50 Not Available Boundary Water Sport Trotline $26.00 $49.50 Fishing Tournament Permit $25.00 $25.00 Fishing, Hunting, Habitat Fee Combo $55.00 Not Available Paddlefish Fishing License & Tag $25.50 $49.00 Give your kids a lifetime of BIG memories The COVID-19 pandemic ignited Iowans’ pent-up passion to get out and enjoy the outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Minnesota Fishing Regulations Handbook
    2014 MINNESOTA FISHING REGULATIONS Effective March 1, 2014 through February 28, 2015 ©MN Fishing ©MN Fishing mndnr.gov (888) 646-6367 (651) 296-6157 24‑hour TIP hotline 1‑800‑652‑9093 (dial #TIP for AT&T, Midwest Wireless, Unicel and Verizon cell phone customers) nglers contribute to good fishing every time they purchaseA a rod, reel or most other manufactured fishing products. ot apparent at the checkout counter, Nthese purchases quietly raise revenue through a 10 percent federal excise tax paid by the manufacturers. ranting these dollars to Minnesota and other statesG is the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through its Wildlife and Sports Fish Restoration program. ast year, the Minnesota DNR received $13.6 Lmillion through this program. very one of these dollars is used to maintain and Eimprove fishing, boating and angling access, and help create the next generation of environmentally enlightened anglers. ead more about this important funding sourceR at http://wsfr75.com pread the word, too, so more people know how Smanufacturers, anglers and natural resource agencies work together. Photo courtesy of Take Me Fishing Angler Notes: DNR Information: (651) 296-6157 or 1-888-646-6367 (MINNDNR) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Trespass Law ..................................................................................................................... 2 Aquatic Invasive Species .................................................................................................... 3 Definitions ..........................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • April 23 Iowa Fishing Report.Pdf
    Top Iowa Fishing Spots for the Week of April 23 The way we interact with others may be a little different right now with Iowa's current State of Emergency. The Iowa DNR has made adjustments to protect the health and safety of state employees, the public, and our angling community. But that doesn’t mean you can’t go fishing. Stay safe when fishing this spring with these tips: Try a new fishing spot — if your regular fishing location is popular and busy, try out a new one where less people are fishing. Once you find your spot, keep at least 6 feet of distance between you and other groups. Stick with your immediate family, but keep groups to fewer than 10 people. Bring lures from home instead of buying bait to minimize your interaction with other people. Bring hand sanitizer and wash your hands often. This weekly fishing report is compiled from information gathered from local bait shops, angler creel surveys and county and state parks staff. You can check the activity of your favorite lake or stretch of river within each district, including which species are being caught, a rating of the bite (slow, fair, good or excellent), as well as a hot bait or lure pattern. For current information, contact the district fisheries office at the phone number listed at the end of each district report. NORTHWEST NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI RIVER SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST NORTHWEST Black Hawk Lake The outdoor walkway on the fish house structure in Town Bay is open to anglers; the indoor portion of the structure remains closed to the public due to physical distancing guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Communities and Their Relation to Environmental Factors in the Eastern Iowa Basins in Iowa and Minnesota, 1996
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program Fish Communities and Their Relation to Environmental Factors in the Eastern Iowa Basins in Iowa and Minnesota, 1996 Water-Resources Investigations Report 00–4194 Eastern Iowa Basins 93° 43° 92° National Water-Quality Assessment Study Unit 91° 42° r ive R i p p i s s i s s i M 41° U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Fish Communities and Their Relation to Environmental Factors in the Eastern Iowa Basins in Iowa and Minnesota, 1996 By Daniel J. Sullivan Water-Resources Investigations Report 00–4194 Iowa City, Iowa 2000 FOR E WOR D The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey • Describe how water quality is changing over (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the time. earth resources of the Nation and to provide informa- • Improve understanding of the primary natural tion that will assist resource managers and policymak- and human factors that affect water-quality ers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound conditions. decisions. Assessment of water-quality conditions and This information will help support the development trends is an important part of this overall mission. and evaluation of management, regulatory, and moni- One of the greatest challenges faced by water- toring decisions by other Federal, State, and local resources scientists is acquiring reliable information agencies to protect, use, and enhance water resources. that will guide the use and protection of the Nation’s The goals of the NAWQA Program are being water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Iowa Fishing Spots for the Week of May 21 the Way We Interact With
    Top Iowa Fishing Spots for the Week of May 21 The way we interact with others may be a little different right now with Iowa's current State of Emergency. The Iowa DNR has made adjustments to protect the health and safety of state employees, the public, and our angling community. But that doesn’t mean you can’t go fishing. Stay safe when fishing this spring with these tips: Try a new fishing spot — if your regular fishing location is popular and busy, try out a new one where less people are fishing. Once you find your spot, keep at least 6 feet of distance between you and other groups. Stick with your immediate family, but keep groups to fewer than 10 people. Bring lures from home instead of buying bait to minimize your interaction with other people. Bring hand sanitizer and wash your hands often. This weekly fishing report is compiled from information gathered from local bait shops, angler creel surveys and county and state parks staff. You can check the activity of your favorite lake or stretch of river within each district, including which species are being caught, a rating of the bite (slow, fair, good or excellent), as well as a hot bait or lure pattern. For current information, contact the district fisheries office at the phone number listed at the end of each district report. NORTHWEST NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI RIVER SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST NORTHWEST Black Hawk Lake Water temperature is around 60 degrees. The outdoor walkway on the fish house structure in Town Bay is open to anglers; the indoor portion of the structure remains closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared for the State of Iowa Iowa Natural Resources Council by Corps of Engineers, U
    MISSOURI PREPARED FOR THE STATE OF IOWA IOWA NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARI\f,y ROCK ISLAND DISTRICT, ILLINOIS ) JUNE 1975 CONTENTS Page PREFACE . BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Settlement... 1 The Stream and Its Valley 2 Developments in the Flood Plain 2 FLOOD SITUATION . 4 Sources of Data 4 Flood Season and Flood-Characteristics. 6 Factors Affecting Flooding and Its Impact 6 Obstructions to flood flows ... 6 Flood damage reduction measures.. 7 Other factors and their impacts.. 12 Flood warning and forecasting 12 Flood fighting and emergency evacuation plans 13 Material storage on the flood plain 13 PAST FLOODS . 15 Summary of Historical Floods. 15 Flood Records ... 15 Flood Descriptions. 15 Flood of 1918. 16 Flood of 1944. 17 Flood of 1974. 17 i STORY PlANNINGCOUNTY & ZONING Story County Courthouse NEVADA. IOWA 50201 CONTENTS (Continued) Page FUTURE FLOODS . 22 Intermediate Regional Flood 22 Standard Project Flood. 23 Frequency . 24 Hazards of Large Floods .. 25 Flooded areas and flood damages. 25 Obstructions . 26 Velocities of flow ....... 28 Rates of rise and duration of flooding 28 Photographs, future flood heights. 28 GLOSSARY. 35 TABLES Table Page Drainage Areas ...... 2 2 Flood Crest Elevations .. 5 3 Bridges and Flood Elevations 11 4 Peak Discharges.. 24 5 Flood Elevations . 27 6 Maximum Velocities 29 7 Rates of Rise and Duration 30 'f "" , f' .. � �� , ll...1 YTi"'!Mt�':IJ'J ""111I·" '." f. ") \' -, ;\0.. ... f... �·l " CONTENTS (Continued) PLATES Plate Page 1 General Map . Opposite Page i 2 Index Map of Flooded Area . At end of report 3-11 Flooded Areas " " 12-1 4 Water Surface Profiles " " 15 Standard Project Flood Discharge Hydrograph " " 16 Selected Cross Sections " " FIGURES Figure Page 1-6 Bridges in the Study Reach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sartell Community Center Is Now Open! Monday-Thursday
    JUL - AUG 2020 Vol. 10, Number 6 Sartell Community Center 850 19th St S | Sartell, MN 56377 The Sartell Community Center is now open! Our new summer hours for the walking track and open gym activities are Monday-Thursday 8am - 7pm and Friday 8am - 4pm Saturday 8am - 12 noon. At the time of this publication the library and senior center are not open. We are hoping to open them soon. SARTELL CONNECTION JUL - AUG 2020 2 Meet City of Sartell Employees Scott Saehr Anna Gruber Assistant City Administrator and City Administrator Director of Community Development Prior to her role as City Administrator, Anna served on Scott joined the City of Sartell in May of Sartell’s Economic Development Commission. 2020. He earned his Bachelor of Arts degree A typical day as administrator involves both internal and in Entrepreneurship from the University of external management of projects, partners and people. Saint Thomas, in St. Paul. Every day is different which is what she loves about this Prior to working for City of Sartell, Scott was career. Her favorite part of this position is having the involved in both the private and government opportunity to positively impact and serve communities. sector. He worked in city administration, local It is the community she lives in, invested in, and is raising government cooperative purchasing, sales and her family in. Making a positive impact and service marketing, as well as owned a private busi- becomes even more important because of it. ness. Scott also provided consultant services Anna and her husband, Nick, have been married for 12 for local cities within Region 5 as an interim years.
    [Show full text]