DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2012.02169V3 [Astro-Ph.GA] 28 Jul 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2012.02169V3 [Astro-Ph.GA] 28 Jul 2021 A purely acceleration-based measurement of the fundamental Galactic parameters Jo Bovy∗ David A. Dunlap Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H4, Canada (Dated: July 29, 2021) Klioner et al. have used the Gaia EDR3 data to directly measure the solar system's accelera- tion within the Milky Way using the apparent proper motions of quasars. Here I show that this single absolute acceleration measurement in combination with relative accelerations obtained from pulsar orbital decay allows one to determine all of the parameters describing the dynamics of our −1 local Galactic environment, including the circular velocity at the Sun V0 = 244 ± 8 km s and its 0 −1 −1 derivative V0 = 2 ± 9 km s kpc , the local angular frequency, the Oort constants, and the Sun's motion with respect to the LSR. This is the first determination of these parameters that only uses the general theory of relativity without the need for additional assumptions. Introduction|A good determination of the local gravi- where V0 and R0 are the local circular velocity and the tational and velocity fields near the Sun in the Milky Way distance to the Galactic center. This acceleration points is of fundamental importance to our understanding of the towards the Galactic center. local matter distribution [1]|including its dark matter Galactic gravitational fields are often expressed in content [2{4]|for correcting observations for the effects terms of the velocity of a circular orbit and the circu- of the Sun's velocity and acceleration, for predicting the lar velocity at the Sun, V0, is one of the most funda- expected annual modulation signal in dark-matter de- mental parameters of the Milky Way. It is clear that tection experiments [5], and for many other applications the acceleration measurement in Equation (1) provides in astro(-particle )physics. However, our knowledge of a stringent constraint on V0, but to actually obtain V0 the gravitational field within any galaxy, including our (and all of the other fundamental parameters that I will own, has been fundamentally limited by the fact that discuss below), we need to combine Equation (1) with a gravitational theories (i.e., that of the general theory of measurement of the Sun's distance to the Galactic cen- relativity, or its usually applicable Newtonian limit) only ter, R0. Luckily, we are fortunate enough to now have directly connect accelerations to the mass distribution, a measurement of R0 that essentially only employs fun- while we cannot measure the absolute galactic accelera- damental physics, because a highly precise measurement tion of any star. of R0 was obtained from post-Newtonian modeling of the This changed recently, because Klioner et al. [6] per- orbit of the star S2 around the Milky Way's supermassive formed a precise and, more importantly, accurate deter- black hole. Precise measurements of S2's orbit using the mination of the acceleration of the solar system barycen- GRAVITY instrument on the VLT have allowed its grav- ter with astrometric data from Gaia EDR3 [7, 8]. This itational redshift [12] and Schwarzschild precession [13] measurement uses the apparent proper-motion pattern of to be measured, allowing a precise determination of R0 distant quasars induced by the aberration effect that the [14], because R0 connects the observed motion on the sky acceleration gives rise to. This measurement agrees with with the observed line-of-sight velocity projection of the earlier determinations using Very Long Baseline Interfer- orbit. I use the value for R0 from the recent re-analysis ometry [9, 10], but is based on a set of reference sources of the GRAVITY data [15] that is orders of magnitude larger, allowing an analy- sis that is much freer of systematics. The Milky Way's R0 = 8:275 0:034 kpc ; (2) ± gravitational field is the largest contributor to the total acceleration [11] and at the current measurement pre- but note that the GRAVITY collaboration's preferred cision, plausible non-axisymmetric contributions to the value for R0 changes by more than its uncertainties be- acceleration are too small to be detected. The largest tween different analyses (a situation addressed in Ref. arXiv:2012.02169v3 [astro-ph.GA] 28 Jul 2021 non-Galactic contribution comes from the Large Magel- [15]) and disagrees with the analysis of the gravitational- lanic Cloud [6], but it is only at the few percent level and redshift of S2 by Ref. [16], who find R0 = 7:95 0:06 kpc. ± almost perpendicular to the Galactic contribution. The Together, the measurements in Equations (1) and (2) al- Klioner et al. measurement is therefore a direct mea- low the local circular velocity to be determined surement of the centripetal acceleration at the Sun, with s magnitude a0, which I express as a proper motiona ~ −1 R0 V0 = 244 8 km s : (3) 8:275 kpc a V 2 ± a~ = 0 = 0 = 5:05 0:35 µas yr−1 ; (1) c c R0 ± For the value of R0 from Ref. [16], the central value shifts −1 only to V0 = 239 km s . Another parameter that immediately follows is the an- ∗ [email protected] gular frequency of the circular orbit at the Sun, Ω0 = 2 6 ) 1 5 − 4 as yr µ ( ˜ a 3 2 R 0 )& (2013) 0 . (R V c Oort constants IAU MWPotential2014McMillan (2017) Irrgang et al Dehnen & Binney (1998) FIG. 1. Comparison of the Gaia EDR3 measurement of the local acceleration, expressed as a proper motiona ~ (see Eqn. 1), with previous indirect determinations and popular Milky Way models. V0=R0, which is constrained to be This discrepancy, if real, is an indication that the solar neighborhood as a whole may be perturbed away from a r −1 −1 8:275 kpc circular orbit by non-axisymmetric forces, at the level of Ω0 = 29:4 1:0 km s kpc : (4) 10 km s−1. ± R0 ≈ By combining the measurements of R0 and V0 in the However, we can do much more with these mea- introduction with the observed proper motion µSgr A∗ of surements if we combine them with a few other key the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky measurements of velocities and relative accelerations in Way, Sgr A∗|assumed to be at rest at the Galactic the Milky Way and in fact determine essentially all fun- center|we can now directly determine the Sun's peculiar damental parameters describing the local gravitational velocity, because and velocity field. I explore this in this brief paper. V While the resulting measurements do not currently µSgr A∗ = Ω0 + : (5) have high precision, they stand out as being the only R0 ones that do not assume dynamical equilibrium or any Combining the latest measurement of µSgr A∗ = 6:411 other method for connecting observed velocities to the 0:008 mas yr−1 [20] with the measurements from− the in-± gravitational field. troduction, we get −1 The Sun's motion with respect to the LSR|Generally V = 8:0 8:4 km s : (6) a nuisance parameter, the Sun's peculiar velocity with re- ± spect to the circular orbit through its location (the LSR) This measurement is at the lower end of the previ- is an important parameter when studying the local ve- ously considered range and it agrees with the accepted −1 locity distribution and its gradients and is, for better or V = 12 2 km s from Ref. [18]. It is about 2σ ± −1 worse, often used as part of the correction of observed ve- off from the global value of V 25 km s from Ref. ≈ locities to the Galactocentric reference frame (this is, in [2, 19]. The uncertainty in V is largely driven by fact, unnecessary; however, it is often done). While in the the uncertainty ina ~ and it should therefore improve radial and vertical directions, the assumption of axisym- significantly with future Gaia data releases, which will metry allows the Sun's motion to be determined simply allow us to get to the root of the discrepancy between as the opposite of the mean velocity of local stars in those local and global values. directions|because on average these velocities should be zero in the Galactocentric frame|the asymmetric drift The local acceleration compared to previous constraints makes the determination of the Sun's peculiar velocity in and models|Before continuing the determination of the the direction of Galactic rotation, V , much trickier [17]. local fundamental dynamical parameters, we briefly dis- The generally accepted value derived from observations cuss how the observed acceleration compares to that −1 of local stars is V 12 km s faster than Galactic ro- derived from earlier determinations of V0 and R0 and tation [18]. However,≈ stellar velocities on larger scales also how often-used models for the Milky Way's grav- −1 are most easily understood if V 25 km s [2, 19]. itational potential predicted the observed acceleration. ≈ 3 300 ) 250 1 − 200 ) (km s Observed pulsar data R ( c Gaia EDR3 a˜ V 150 MWPotential2014 McMillan (2017) 1 1 1 100 V = 242 7 km s− + (2 9 km s− kpc− )(R R ) c ± ± − 0 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 R (kpc) FIG. 2. Local circular velocity curve determined solely from observed absolute accelerations for the solar system (Gaia EDR3; black point) and 6 pulsars relatively close to the Galactic mid-plane whose relative acceleration obtained from pulsar timing can be turned into an absolute determination using the solar system's acceleration. The rotation curve is approximately flat over the 2 kpc surrounding the solar radius.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture 10 Milky Way II
    Measuring Structure of the Galaxy • To invert the measured distribution of stars One needs to make a lot – A(m,l,b): # of stars at an of 'corrections' the biggest one apparent mag m, at galactic is due to extinction so one coordinates l,b per sq degree does not repeat Herschel's error! per unit mag. – N(m,l,b): cumulative # of stars with mag < m, at galactic coordinates l,b per sq degree per unit mag. N(m,l,b)=∫ A(m',l,b) dm Into a true 3-D structure 36 Need to Measure Extinction Accurately 37 APOGEE Results • Metallicity across the Milky Way • An example of the fine grain knowledge now being obtained. 38 Gaia Capability • Gaia will survey ~1/4 of the MW (Luri and Robin) 39 Early GAIA Results • Proper motions in the M67 star cluster-accuracies of ~5mas/year (5x10-9 radians/year or 4.3x10-5 pc/year (42 km/sec- 2.5x the speed of the earth around the sun) at distance of M67 ) 40 MW II • Use of gas (HI) to trace velocity field and thus mass of the disk (discuss a bit of the geometry details in the next lecture) – dependence on distance to center of MW • properties of MW (e.g. mass of components) • Cosmic Rays – only directly observable in MW • Start of dynamics 41 Timescales 7 • crossing time tc=2R/σ∼5x10 yrs (R10kpc/v200) • dynamical time td=sqrt(3π/16Gρ)- related to the orbital time; assumption homogenous sphere of density ρ • Relaxation time- the time for a system to 'forget' its initial conditions S+G (eq.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Drag Interstellar Objects and Galactic Dynamical Streams
    Draft version March 25, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 High-Drag Interstellar Objects And Galactic Dynamical Streams T.M. Eubanks1 1Space Initiatives Inc, Clifton, Virginia 20124 (Received; Revised March 25, 2019; Accepted) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT The nature of 1I/’Oumuamua (henceforth, 1I), the first interstellar object known to pass through the solar system, remains mysterious. Feng & Jones noted that the incoming 1I velocity vector “at infinity” (v∞) is close to the motion of the Pleiades dynamical stream (or Local Association), and suggested that 1I is a young object ejected from a star in that stream. Micheli et al. subsequently detected non-gravitational acceleration in the 1I trajectory; this acceleration would not be unusual in an active comet, but 1I observations failed to reveal any signs of activity. Bialy & Loeb hypothesized that the anomalous 1I acceleration was instead due to radiation pressure, which would require an extremely low mass-to-area ratio (or area density). Here I show that a low area density can also explain the very close kinematic association of 1I and the Pleiades stream, as it renders 1I subject to drag capture by interstellar gas clouds. This supports the radiation pressure hypothesis and suggests that there is a significant population of low area density ISOs in the Galaxy, leading, through gas drag, to enhanced ISO concentrations in the galactic dynamical streams. Any interstellar object entrained in a dynamical stream will have a predictable incoming v∞; targeted deep surveys using this information should be able to find dynamical stream objects months to as much as a year before their perihelion, providing the lead time needed for fast-response missions for the future in situ exploration of such objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7 24 Sep 2010 Outline
    Astronomy 330 Lecture 7 24 Sep 2010 Outline Review Counts: A(m), Euclidean slope, Olbers’ paradox Stellar Luminosity Function: Φ(M,S) Structure of the Milky Way: disk, bulge, halo Milky Way kinematics Rotation and Oort’s constants Euclidean slope = Solar motion 0.6m Disk vs halo ) What would A(m An example this imply? log m Review: Galactic structure Stellar Luminosity Function: Φ What does it look like? How do you measure it? What’s Malmquist Bias? Modeling the MW Exponential disk: ρdisk ~ ρ0exp(-z/z0-R/hR) (radially/vertically) -3 Halo – ρhalo ~ ρ0r (RR Lyrae stars, globular clusters) See handout – Benjamin et al. (2005) Galactic Center/Bar Galactic Model: disk component 10 Ldisk = 2 x 10 L (B band) hR = 3 kpc (scale length) z0 = (scale height) round numbers! = 150 pc (extreme Pop I) = 350 pc (Pop I) = 1 kpc (Pop II) Rmax = 12 kpc Rmin = 3 kpc Inside 3 kpc, the Galaxy is a mess, with a bar, expanding shell, etc… Galactic Bar Lots of other disk galaxies have a central bar (elongated structure). Does the Milky Way? Photometry – what does the stellar distribution in the center of the Galaxy look like? 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Bar-like distribution: N = N0 exp (-0.5r ), where r = (x +y )/R + z /z0 Observe A(m) as a function of Galactic coordinates (l,b) Use N as an estimate of your source distribution: counts A(m,l,b) appear bar-like Sevenster (1990s) found overabundance of OH/IR stars in 1stquadrant. Asymmetry is also seen in RR Lyrae distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in the Determination of Some Galactic Constants in the Milky Way
    Recent advances in the determination of some Galactic constants in the Milky Way Jacques P. Vallée National Research Council of Canada, National Science Infrastructure, Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, B.C., Canada V9E 2E7 Keywords: Galactic structure; Galactic constants; Galactic disk; statistics Abstract. Here we statistically evaluate recent advances in determining the Sun- Galactic Center distance (Rsun) as well as recent measures of the orbital velocity around the Galactic Center (Vlsr), and the angular rotation parameters of various objects. Recent statistical results point to Rsun = 8.0 ± 0.2 kpc, Vlsr= 230 ± 3 km/s, and angular rotation at the Sun (ω) near 29 ± 1 km/s/kpc for the gas and stars at the Local Standard of Rest, and near 23 ± 2 km/s/kpc for the spiral pattern itself. This angular difference is similar to what had been predicted by density wave models, along with the observation that the galactic longitude of each spiral arm tracer (dust, cold CO) for each spiral arm becomes reversed across the Galactic Meridian (Vallée 2016b). 1. Introduction The value of the distance of the Sun to the Galactic Center, Rsun , is one of the fundamental parameters of our Milky Way disk galaxy. Similarly, the value of the circular orbital velocity Vlsr, for the Local Standard of Rest at radius Rsun around the Galactic Center, is another fundamental parameter. In 1985, the IAU recommended the use of Rsun =8.5 kpc and Vlsr = 220 km/s. Recent measurements of Rsun and Vlsr deviate somewhat from this IAU recommendation. Section 2 makes a table of recent measurements of two galactic constants, namely the distance of the Sun to the Galactic Center, and the orbital circular velocity near the Sun around the Galactic Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Milky Way Galaxy
    TheThe MilkyMilky WayWay GalaxyGalaxy Daniela Carollo RSAA-Mount Stromlo Observatory-Australia Lecture N. 1 The Milky Way from the Death Valley InIn thisthis lecture:lecture: General characteristic of the Milky Way Reference Systems Astrometry Galactic Structures TheThe MilkyMilky WayWay Why it is so important? We live in the Milky Way! Our Galaxy is like a laboratory , it can be studied in unique detail. We can recognize its structures, and study the stellar populations. We can infer its formation and evolution using the tracers of its oldest part: the Halo Near field cosmology If we could see the Milky Way from the outside it might looks like our closest neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy. NGC 2997 Face on view • We live at edge of disk • Disadvantage: structure obscured by “dust”. It is very difficult to observe towards the center of the Galaxy due to the strong absorption. • Advantage: can study motions of nearby stars COBE Near IR View Reference Systems Equatorial Coordinate System From Binney and Merrifield, Galactic Astronomy . Some definitions: Celestial sphere: an imaginary sphere of infinite radius centered on the Earth NCP and SCP: the extension of the Earth’s axis to the celestial sphere define the Nord and South Celestial Poles. The extension of the Earth’s Equatorial Plane determine the Celestial Equator Great Circle: a circle on the celestial sphere defined by the intersection of a plane passing through the sphere center, and the surface of the sphere. The great circle through the celestial poles and a star’s position is that star hour circle Zenith: that point at which the extended vertical line intersects the celestial sphere Meridian: great circle passing through the celestial poles and the zenith The earth rotates at an approximately constant rate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars?
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. main ©ESO 2020 December 2, 2020 Gaia Early Data Release 3: The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars? Gaia Collaboration, R.L. Smart 1??, L.M. Sarro 2, J. Rybizki 3, C. Reylé 4, A.C. Robin 4, N.C. Hambly 5, U. Abbas 1, M.A. Barstow 6, J.H.J. de Bruijne 7, B. Bucciarelli 1, J.M. Carrasco 8, W.J. Cooper 9; 1, S.T. Hodgkin 10, E. Masana 8, D. Michalik 7, J. Sahlmann 11, A. Sozzetti 1, A.G.A. Brown 12, A. Vallenari 13, T. Prusti 7, C. Babusiaux 14; 15, M. Biermann16, O.L. Creevey 17, D.W. Evans 10, L. Eyer 18, A. Hutton19, F. Jansen7, C. Jordi 8, S.A. Klioner 20, U. Lammers 21, L. Lindegren 22, X. Luri 8, F. Mignard17, C. Panem23, D. Pourbaix 24; 25, S. Randich 26, P. Sartoretti15, C. Soubiran 27, N.A. Walton 10, F. Arenou 15, C.A.L. Bailer-Jones3, U. Bastian 16, M. Cropper 28, R. Drimmel 1, D. Katz 15, M.G. Lattanzi 1; 29, F. van Leeuwen10, J. Bakker21, J. Castañeda 30, F. De Angeli10, C. Ducourant 27, C. Fabricius 8, M. Fouesneau 3, Y. Frémat 31, R. Guerra 21, A. Guerrier23, J. Guiraud23, A. Jean-Antoine Piccolo23, R. Messineo32, N. Mowlavi18, C. Nicolas23, K. Nienartowicz 33; 34, F. Pailler23, P. Panuzzo 15, F. Riclet23, W. Roux23, G.M. Seabroke28, R. Sordo 13, P. Tanga 17, F. Thévenin17, G. Gracia-Abril35; 16, J. Portell 8, D. Teyssier 36, M. Altmann 16; 37, R. Andrae3, I.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 162 Lecture 1 Patrick S
    Astronomy 162 Lecture 1 Patrick S. Osmer Spring 2006 • INTRODUCE SELF, T.As • ASK STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES, INTERESTS • HOW MANY TOOK Ay161 LAST QUARTER? • HOW MANY WORK? • ASK ABOUT IF THEY HEARD ABOUT RECENT HST, CHANDRA, AND SPITZER SPACE TELESCOPE RESULTS A SURVEY • WHY ARE YOU TAKING THIS COURSE? • WHAT DO YOU HOPE TO LEARN? • DO YOU FIND SCIENCE INTERESTING? • WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE TEXTBOOK? E-MAIL AND THE WORLD WIDE WEB • NOTE THAT LECTURE NOTES AND COURSE INFORMATION WILL BE POSTED ON THE WEB SITE FOR THE COURSE: www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~posmer/Ay162/ index.html • INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE, SO KEEP CHECKING THE WEB SITE • COME TO CLASS!! I cannot guarantee that everything I say will be on the web notes. PURPOSE OF A LECTURE • BACKGROUND • HISTORY • PERSONAL COMMENTS • CURRENT EVENTS Ay 162, Spring 2006 Week 1, part 1 p. 1 of 18 • TIE MATERIAL TOGETHER, BRING IT ALIVE • DESCRIBE HOW DISCOVERIES AND UNDERSTANDING OCCUR IN ASTRONOMY • PROVIDE MOTIVATION • MAYBE EVEN SOME HUMOR STUDY OF SCIENCE • SCIENCE IS: – THE COLLECTION OF FACTS AND OBSERVATION OF PHENOMENA – THE EFFORT TO FIND AN UNDERLYING ORDER AND UNDERSTANDING ASTRONOMY • THE STUDY OF THE UNIVERSE • FROM OUTSIDE THE EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE TO THE LIMIT OF OBSERVATION OBSERVATIONAL ASTRONOMY: • DISCOVERY OF COMPONENTS OF UNIVERSE (PLANETS, STARS, NEBULAE, BLACK HOLES, GALAXIES) • OBSERVING THEIR PROPERTIES • SURVEYING AND MAPPING THEIR DISTRIBUTION IN SPACE ASTROPHYSICS AND THEORY • UNDERSTANDING THE PHYSICAL PROCESSES OF THE OBJECTS IN THE UNIVERSE • DETERMINING THEIR COMPOSITIONS, ORIGINS, EVOLUTION, FINAL STATES Ay 162, Spring 2006 Week 1, part 1 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Galactic Rotation S&G Sec 2.3!
    Galactic Rotation S&G Sec 2.3! • The majority of the motions of the stars in the MW is rotational! • Prime way of measuring mass of spiral galaxies! • map out the distribution of galactic gas! • strong evidence for dark matter! 120! Galactic Rotation! • See SG 2.3, BM ch 3 B&T ch 2.6,2.7 B&T fig 1.3! and ch 6 ! • Coordinate system: define velocity vector by π,θ,z! π radial velocity wrt galactic center ! θ motion tangential to GC with positive values in direct of galactic rotation! z motion perpendicular to the plane, positive values toward North If the galaxy is axisymmetric galactic pole! and in steady state then each pt • origin is the galactic center (center or in the plane has a velocity mass/rotation) ! corresponding to a circular • Local standard of rest (BM pg 536)! velocity around center of mass • velocity of a test particle moving in of MW ! the plane of the MW on a closed orbit that passes thru the present position of (π,θ,z)LSR=(0,θ0,0) with! 121! the sun ! θ0 =θ0(R)! Local Standard of Rest The Sun (and most stars) are on slightly perturbed orbits that resemble rosettes making it difficult to measure relative motions of stars around the Sun.! ! Establish a reference frame that is a perfect circular orbit about the Galactic Center.! Local Standard of Rest - reference frame for measuring velocities in the Galaxy. Position of the Sun if its motion were completely governed by circular motion around the Galaxy. Use cylindrical coordinates for the Galactic plane to define the Sun’s motion w.r.t the Local Standard of Rest Coordinate
    [Show full text]
  • Gaia Early Data Release 3 Special Issue Gaia Early Data Release 3 the Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars? Gaia Collaboration: R
    A&A 649, A6 (2021) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039498 & © ESO 2021 Astrophysics Gaia Early Data Release 3 Special issue Gaia Early Data Release 3 The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars? Gaia Collaboration: R. L. Smart1,??, L. M. Sarro2, J. Rybizki3, C. Reylé4, A. C. Robin4, N. C. Hambly5, U. Abbas1, M. A. Barstow6, J. H. J. de Bruijne7, B. Bucciarelli1, J. M. Carrasco8, W. J. Cooper9,1, S. T. Hodgkin10, E. Masana8, D. Michalik7, J. Sahlmann11, A. Sozzetti1, A. G. A. Brown12, A. Vallenari13, T. Prusti7, C. Babusiaux14,15, M. Biermann16, O. L. Creevey17, D. W. Evans10, L. Eyer18, A. Hutton19, F. Jansen7, C. Jordi8, S. A. Klioner20, U. Lammers21, L. Lindegren22, X. Luri8, F. Mignard17, C. Panem23, D. Pourbaix24,25, S. Randich26, P. Sartoretti15, C. Soubiran27, N. A. Walton10, F. Arenou15, C. A. L. Bailer-Jones3, U. Bastian16, M. Cropper28, R. Drimmel1, D. Katz15, M. G. Lattanzi1,29, F. van Leeuwen10, J. Bakker21, J. Castañeda30, F. De Angeli10, C. Ducourant27, C. Fabricius8, M. Fouesneau3, Y. Frémat31, R. Guerra21, A. Guerrier23, J. Guiraud23, A. Jean-Antoine Piccolo23, R. Messineo32, N. Mowlavi18, C. Nicolas23, K. Nienartowicz33,34, F. Pailler23, P. Panuzzo15, F. Riclet23, W. Roux23, G. M. Seabroke28, R. Sordo13, P. Tanga17, F. Thévenin17, G. Gracia-Abril35,16, J. Portell8, D. Teyssier36, M. Altmann16,37, R. Andrae3, I. Bellas-Velidis38, K. Benson28, J. Berthier39, R. Blomme31, E. Brugaletta40, P. W. Burgess10, G. Busso10, B. Carry17, A. Cellino1, N. Cheek41, G. Clementini42, Y. Damerdji43,44, M. Davidson5, L. Delchambre43, A. Dell’Oro26, J. Fernández-Hernández45, L. Galluccio17, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Table
    PREFACE: Scope and purpose of this essay This online essay is an extended version of the essay in the printed-edition Handbook, containing all the material of its printed-edition accompaniment, but adding material of its own. The accompanying online table is likewise an extended version of the printed-edition table, (a) with extra stars (after providing for multiplicity, as we explain below, the brightest MK-classified 322, allowing for variability, where the printed edition has almost 30 fewer, allowing for variability: our cutoff is mag. ~3.55), and (b) with additional remarks for most of the duplicated stars. We use a dagger superscript (†) to mark data cells for which the online table supplies some additional information, some context, or a caveat. The online essay and table try to address the needs of three kinds of serious amateur: amateurs who are also astrophysics students (whether or not enrolled formally at some campus); amateurs who, like many in RASC, assist in public outreach, through some form of lecturing; and amateurs who are planning their own private citizen-science observing runs, in the spirit of such “pro-am” organizations as AAVSO. Additionally, we would hope that the online project will help serve a constituency of sky-lovers, whether professional or amateur, who work with the heavens in an unambitious and contemplative spirit, seeking to understand at the eyepiece, or even with the naked eye, the realities behind the little that their limited circumstances may allow them to see. (This is the same contemplative exercise as is proposed for the Cyg X-1 black hole, with its gas-dumping supergiant companion HD226868, in the Handbook printed-editions “Expired Stars” essay: with a small telescope, or even with binoculars, we first find HD226868, and then take a moment to ponder in awe the accompanying unobserved realities of gas-fed hot accretion disk, event horizon, and spacetime singularity.) Our online project, started as a supplement to the 2017 Handbook, must be considered still in its rather early stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1805.08326V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 7 Dec 2018 Dwarf Galaxies (Belokurov Et Al
    Draft version December 10, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Rotating halo traced by the K giant stars from LAMOST and Gaia Hao Tian1 (LAMOST Fellow) Chao Liu,1 Yan Xu,1 and Xiangxiang Xue1 1Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datun Road 20A, Beijing 100012, PR China; (Received December 10, 2018; Revised December 10, 2018; Accepted |{) Submitted to |- ABSTRACT With the help of Gaia DR2, we are able to obtain the full 6-D phase space information for stars from LAMOST DR5. With high precision of position, velocity, and metallicity, the rotation of the local stellar halo is presented using the K giant stars with [Fe/H]< −1 dex within 4 kpc from the Sun. By fitting the rotational velocity distribution with three Gaussian components, stellar halo, disk, and a +4 −1 counter-rotating hot population, we find that the local halo progradely rotates with VT = +27−5 km s −1 providing the local standard of rest velocity of VLSR = 232 km s . Meanwhile, we obtain the dispersion +4 −1 of rotational velocity is σT = 72−4 km s . Although the rotational velocity strongly depends on the choice of VLSR, the trend of prograde rotation is substantial even when VLSR is set at as low as 220 km s−1. Moreover, we derive the rotation for subsamples with different metallicities and find that the rotational velocity is essentially not correlated with [Fe/H]. This may hint a secular evolution origin of the prograde rotation. It shows that the metallicity of the progradely rotating halo is peaked within -1.9<[Fe/H]<-1.6 without considering the selection effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Kinematics in the Galaxy: Reference Frames
    The motions of stars in the Galaxy • The stars in the Galaxy define various components, that do not only differ in their spatial distribution but also in their kinematics. • The dominant motion of stars (and gas) in the Galactic disk is rotation (around the centre of the Galaxy), and these motions occur on nearly circular orbits. • The stars in the thick disk, rotate more slowly than those in the thin disk. Their random motions are slightly larger. • The stars in the halo, however, do not rotate in an orderly fashion, their random motions are large, and their orbits are rather elongated. • Questions we will address today: How do we know this? How can we determine the rotational speed of the nearby disk? How can we best describe the motions of the stars in the different components? Stellar kinematics and reference frames The fundamental Galactic reference frame: is the most important from the point of view of galactic dynamics. It is centered on the galaxy’s centre of mass. The velocity of a star in this reference frame is often given in cylindrical coordinates (Π,Θ,Z) (or (VR, Vφ, Vz)) where •Π: is along the radial direction (in the Galactic plane), and positive outwards (l=180, b=0) •Θ: is in the tangential direction (in the Galactic plane), positive in the direction of galactic rotation (l=90, b=0) •Z: is perpendicular to the galactic plane, and positive northwards The local standard of rest •We define a reference system on the Galactic plane that is moving on a circular orbit around the Galactic centre, as a local standard of rest.
    [Show full text]