DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Rights Report 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Rights Report 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS REPORT 2007 HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT ABOUT EARTHJUSTICE Earthjustice was founded in 1971 and has consultative status with the UN Economic and Social Council. We are a nonprofit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations and communities. Earthjustice’s International Program uses the power of the law to protect the environment and human health worldwide. We represent public interest and community groups in international tribunals and domestic courts to hold corporations and governments responsible for environmental harm, prevent trade rules from undermining public health and environmental protections, and create strong tools for citizens to defend the right to a healthy environment. This report was prepared by Rosaleen O’Gara Marcello Mollo J. Martin Wagner Neil Popovic Yves Lador Hari Osofsky Shravya Reddy Erin Ganahl Rachel Kastenberg Sarah A. Peters David Takacs and Environmental Justice Course Participants, University of Oregon Law School Earthjustice 426 17th Street Oakland, CA 94612 U.S.A. Telephone: 510-550-6700 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.earthjustice.org FREE REPRODUCTION RIGHTS WITH CITATION TO ORIGINAL. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................................................................... 6 I. INTERNATIONAL .................................................................................................. 6 A. UN Economic and Social Council............................................................................ 8 B. UN Economic and Social Council Bodies ............................................................... 9 1. UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) ....................................................... 9 2. UN Commission on Sustainable Development ..................................................... 18 3. UN Commission for Social Development.............................................................. 19 C. United Nations General Assembly......................................................................... 20 1. World Summit 2005................................................................................................ 20 2. 60th Session of the General Assembly.................................................................... 21 3. 61st Session of the General Assembly .................................................................... 23 4. UN Human Rights Council .................................................................................... 24 5. Other United Nations General Assembly Events................................................. 24 6. UN General Assembly Bodies ................................................................................ 25 D. Other International Bodies .................................................................................... 29 1. The World Bank...................................................................................................... 29 2. World Health Organization (WHO) ..................................................................... 35 3. Global Environmental Facility (GEF) .................................................................. 36 4. International Labour Organization ...................................................................... 37 5. Group of Eight (G8)................................................................................................ 39 6. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)........ 40 E. International Treaties, Treaty Bodies and International Conferences.............. 41 1. The Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision- making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Århus Convention) 41 2. Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal ...................................................................................... 42 3. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)...................... 43 4. Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade............................. 44 5. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Cartagena Protocol ... 45 6. The Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU).................................................................. 46 7. The Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol ....... 47 8. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification ............................... 48 9. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands .................................................................. 49 II. REGIONAL............................................................................................................. 50 A. Africa........................................................................................................................ 50 1. “Fish for All” Summit ............................................................................................ 50 B. Asia........................................................................................................................... 51 1. The Jakarta Declaration......................................................................................... 51 C. Central Asia & the Middle East ............................................................................ 51 1. Formation of Arab Forum for Environment and Development (AFED) .......... 51 D. Central and South America ................................................................................... 52 1. Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA).......................................... 52 2. Inter-American Court of Human Rights .............................................................. 54 3. Initiative for the Integration of Regional Infrastructure in Latin America (IIRSA)..................................................................................................................... 56 4. Andean Free Trade Agreement ............................................................................. 58 E. Europe...................................................................................................................... 59 1. European Court of Human Rights ........................................................................ 59 2. European Commission............................................................................................61 F. Island Nations.......................................................................................................... 66 1. Antarctica / Southern Ocean – Treaty on Illegal Fishing ................................... 66 2. Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate........................... 67 3. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme............................................... 67 G. North America......................................................................................................... 68 1. North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) ....... 68 III. DOMESTIC............................................................................................................. 70 A. Courts....................................................................................................................... 70 1. Nigeria...................................................................................................................... 70 2. South Africa............................................................................................................. 71 3. Botswana.................................................................................................................. 72 4. Chile ......................................................................................................................... 73 5. Australia................................................................................................................... 73 6. United States............................................................................................................ 74 7. Peru .......................................................................................................................... 76 8. Argentina ................................................................................................................. 76 B. Governments ........................................................................................................... 77 1. Brazil ........................................................................................................................ 77 2. Swaziland................................................................................................................. 78 3. Liberia...................................................................................................................... 78 4. Kenya ....................................................................................................................... 80 5. Chile ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Earthjustice-2016-Annual-Report.Pdf
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT Our We are here MISSION BECAUSE THE EARTH NEEDS A GOOD LAWYER. Earthjustice is the premier nonprofit public interest environmental law organization. We wield the power of law and the strength of partnership to protect people’s health; to preserve magnificent places and wildlife; to advance clean energy; and to combat climate change. Earthjustice attorney Tom Waldo in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest THANK YOU A Letter from Our President and Board Chair Clean air, clean water, thriving communities, a vibrant, healthy natural world—these are things that most of us hold dear. Regardless of the political party we support, we cherish our rich natural heritage and strive to make the world a better place for our children. Political winds change, but these shared values— values that drive our work here at Earthjustice—stand the test of time. These are the fights we cannot afford to lose. Thanks to your support, Earthjustice made substantial progress in fiscal year 2016. As you will read in these pages, together we won key victories in each of our programs. We protected the wild with our fight to restore wild salmon to the Columbia and Snake Rivers in the Pacific Northwest and our efforts to put the brakes on a sprawling resort complex that threatened the Grand Canyon. With our partners and allies, we made major steps toward addressing the climate crisis, blocking a massive coal strip mine in Montana and coal export facilities on the West Coast, and defeating attacks on renewable energy while winning clean energy advances across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ogoni to Endorois (African System) Through Saramaka (Inter-American System) Does Provide More
    INDIGENOUS GROUPS AND THE DEVELOPING JURISPRUDENCE OF THE AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS: SOME REFLECTIONS * GAETANO PENTASSUGLIA I. INTRODUCTION The African Charter on Human and Peoples‟ Rights – also known as the African or Banjul Charter (AfrCH) - lies at the core of the African human rights regime. It was adopted in 1981 and entered into force in 1986 following ratification by a majority of member states of the (then) Organisation of African Unity.1 Together with a number of classical individual rights of civil, political and/or socio-economic nature, it enshrines rights of „peoples‟ in Articles 19 through to 24. The AfrCH is monitored by the African Commission on Human and Peoples‟ Rights (ACHPR), which performs both promotional and protective functions. Such functions are principally organised around examining states‟ reports (Article 62), examining communications from individuals, NGOs or states parties on alleged breaches (Articles 47, 55), and interpreting the AfrCH more generally (Article 45(3)). Importantly individuals or NGOs may petition the ACHPR irrespective of whether they are the direct victims of the violation complained of, subject to pre- defined procedural requirements. As the number of African institutions increases,2 the ACHPR still remains central to enhancing human rights protection in Africa.3 * Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow, Department of Law, European University Institute, Italy, 2010; Senior Lecturer in International Law and Director of the International and European Law Unit, University of Liverpool, UK; Visiting Professor, University of Toronto Faculty of Law, Fall 2009. His latest publications include Minority Groups and Judicial Discourse in International Law: A Comparative Perspective (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Late Miocene -Quaternary Forearc Uplift In
    Late Miocene - Quaternary forearc uplift in southern Peru: new insights from 10 Be dates and rocky coastal sequences Vincent Regard, Joseph Martinod, Marianne Saillard, Sébastien Carretier, Laëtitia Leanni, Laurence Audin, Kevin Pedoja To cite this version: Vincent Regard, Joseph Martinod, Marianne Saillard, Sébastien Carretier, Laëtitia Leanni, et al.. Late Miocene - Quaternary forearc uplift in southern Peru: new insights from 10 Be dates and rocky coastal sequences. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Elsevier, 2021, 8th ISAG Special Issue, 109, pp.103261. 10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103261. hal-03162682 HAL Id: hal-03162682 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03162682 Submitted on 8 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Late Miocene - Quaternary forearc uplift in southern Peru: new insights from 10Be dates and rocky coastal sequences 5 Vincent Regard1*, Joseph Martinod2, Marianne Saillard3, Sébastien Carretier1, Laetitia Leanni4, Gérard Hérail1, Laurence Audin2, Kevin Pedoja5 1. Géosciences Environnement Toulouse/OMP, Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, IRD, UPS, Toulouse, France 2. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, ISTerre, Grenoble, France. 10 3. Université Côte d'Azur, IRD, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Géoazur, 250 rue Albert Einstein, Sophia Antipolis 06560 Valbonne, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 17, Number 15, April 6, 1990
    LAROUCHE So, You Wish to Leant All About BUT YOU'D BEDER EconoInics? KNOW WHAT H. Jr. HE HAS TO SAY by Lyndon LaRouche, A text on elementary mathematical economics, by the world's leading economist. Find out why EIR was right, when everyone else was wrong. The Power of Order from: Ben Franklin Booksellers, Inc. Reason: 1988 27 South King Street Leesburg, Va. 22075 An Autobiography by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. $9.95 plus shipping ($1.50 for first book, $.50 for each additional book). Information on bulk rates and videotape Published by Executive Intelligence Review Order from Ben Franklin Booksellers, 27 South King St., Leesburg, VA 22075. available on request. $10 plus shipping ($1.50 for first copy, .50 for each ad,:::ional). Bulk rates available. THE POWER OF REASON 1iM.'" An exciting new videotape is now available on the life and work of Lyndon LaRouche, political leader and scientist, who is currently an American political prisoner, together with six of his leading associates. This tape includes clips of some of LaRouche's most important, historic speeches, on economics, history, culture, science, AIDS, and t e drug trade. , This tape will recruit your friends to the fight forr Western civilization! Order it today! $100.00 Checks or money orders should be sent to: P.O. Box 535, Leesburg, VA 22075 HumanPlease specify Rights whether Fund you wish Beta or VHS. Allow 4 weeks for delivery. Founder and Contributing Editor: From the Editor Lyndon H. LaRouche. Jr. Editor: Nora Hamerman Managing Editors: John Sigerson, Susan Welsh Assistant Managing Editor: Ronald Kokinda Editorial Board: Warren Hamerman.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage and Climate Change: Request to Address State Party Climate Action in State of Conservation Reports and Draft Decisions
    February 19, 2020 Ms. Audrey Azoulay Director-General, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [email protected] Dr. Mechtild Rössler Director, UNESCO World Heritage Centre [email protected] Mr. Peter Shadie Director, IUCN World Heritage Programme [email protected] Prof. Toshiyuki Kono President, International Council on Monuments and Sites [email protected] Mr. Joseph King Director, Sites Unit, International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property [email protected] World Heritage and Climate Change: Request to address state party climate action in state of conservation reports and draft decisions Introduction We write on behalf of 76 organizations and individuals that are concerned about the impacts of climate change on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of UNESCO World Heritage properties to recommend that your organizations: • Include, in state of conservation reports and draft decisions for climate-vulnerable properties under review, conclusions about whether the relevant state party’s actions are consistent with a 1.5°C pathway, and, if they are not, recommend steps the state party should take to achieve this; and • Request state parties to report on how they are proactively aligning their actions with the international community’s goal of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C. In taking these steps, your organizations would be following in the footsteps of other United Nations treaty bodies and institutions that have called on state parties to take specific
    [Show full text]
  • The Inconvenient Indigenous
    1 SIDSEL SAUGESTAD The Inconvenient Indigenous Remote Area Development in Botswana, Donor Assistance, and the First People of the Kalahari The Nordic Africa Institute, 2001 2 The book is printed with support from the Norwegian Research Council. Front cover photo: Lokalane – one of the many small groups not recognised as a community in the official scheme of things Back cover photos from top: Irrigation – symbol of objectives and achievements of the RAD programme Children – always a hope for the future John Hardbattle – charismatic first leader of the First People of the Kalahari Ethno-tourism – old dance in new clothing Indexing terms Applied anthropology Bushmen Development programmes Ethnic relations Government policy Indigenous peoples Nation-building NORAD Botswana Kalahari San Photos: The author Language checking: Elaine Almén © The author and The Nordic Africa Institute 2001 ISBN 91-7106-475-3 Printed in Sweden by Centraltryckeriet Åke Svensson AB, Borås 2001 3 My home is in my heart it migrates with me What shall I say brother what shall I say sister They come and ask where is your home they come with papers and say this belongs to nobody this is government land everything belongs to the State What shall I say sister what shall I say brother […] All of this is my home and I carry it in my heart NILS ASLAK VALKEAPÄÄ Trekways of the Wind 1994 ∫ This conference that I see here is something very big. It can be the beginning of something big. I hope it is not the end of something big. ARON JOHANNES at the opening of the Regional San Conference in Gaborone, October 1993 4 Preface and Acknowledgements The title of this book is not a description of the indigenous people of Botswana, it is a characterisation of a prevailing attitude to this group.
    [Show full text]
  • An Easter Island Report from 1969
    Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation Volume 21 Issue 1 Article 9 2007 A Look Back: An Easter Island Report from 1969 Shawn McLaughlin Follow this and additional works at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj Part of the History of the Pacific Islands Commons, and the Pacific Islands Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation McLaughlin, Shawn (2007) "A Look Back: An Easter Island Report from 1969," Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation: Vol. 21 : Iss. 1 , Article 9. Available at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj/vol21/iss1/9 This Research Report is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Hawai`i Press at Kahualike. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation by an authorized editor of Kahualike. For more information, please contact [email protected]. McLaughlin: An Easter Island Report from 1969 is high and precipitou , allowing of no landing, except in one snug little cove on the northern hore; on the ea t and we t the coast i low and much indented, so that, although EASTER LD REpORT FROM I 1869 rocky, landing may be effected in orne places on the side The following is a report publi hed in the London Times that happen to be leeward. Cook' -bay, or Hanga-roa, on from January 21 1869 by W. A. Powell, who wa on board the we tern hore, afford good anchorage from October till the HMS Topaze during it vi it to Easter Island the previ­ April, the ea on of the trade; in otber month it i often a ou year.
    [Show full text]
  • LOST LANDS? (Land) Rights of the San in Botswana and the Legal Concept of Indigeneity in Africa
    Manuela Zips-Mairitsch LOST LANDS? (Land) Rights of the San in Botswana and the Legal Concept of Indigeneity in Africa LIT Contents Acknowledgements 9 Preface by Rene 13 Introduction 21 Part 1: Indigenous Peoples in International Law I. Historical Overview 29 II. "Indigenous Peoples": Term, Concepts, and Definitions 34 Differentiation from Term "Minority" 40 III. Special Indigenous Rights or Special Circumstances? Indigenous Protection Standards, Rights of Freedom, and 42 1. Sources of Law 42 1.1 Binding Norms 43 1.1.1 Convention 169 43 1.1.2 UN Convention on Biological Diversity 45 1.2 "Soft law" Instruments 46 1.2.1 Agenda 21, Chapter 26 (1992) 47 1.2.2 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 47 1.2.3 Declarations and Policies of various International Bodies 52 1.3 Indigenous Rights as Part of Customary International Law 56 2. "Sources of Life": Lands and Natural Resources 57 2.1 Material Standards of Protection 57 2.1.1 Cause of Action 58 2.1.2 The Relationship between Indigenous Peoples and their Territories 59 2.1.3 Collective Land Rights 61 2.1.4 Scope of Indigenous Territories 63 2.1.5 Restriction of Alienation and Disposal 64 2.2 Universal Human Rights Treaties 64 2.2.1 Right of Ownership 65 2.2.2 Right to Culture 66 2.2.3 Right to Private and Family Life 66 2.3 Jurisdiction of International Monitoring Bodies 67 2.3.1 Human Rights Committee 67 2.3.2 Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination 68 3.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT DESTROYS Thekill HEALTH of TRIBAL PEOPLES
    LAND AND LIFE Progress can HOW IMPOSED DEVELOPMENT DESTROYS THEkill HEALTH OF TRIBAL PEOPLES a Survival International publication ‘OUTSIDERS WHO COME HERE ALWAYS CLAIM THEY ARE BRINGING PROGRESS. BUT ALL THEY BRING ARE EMPTY PROMISES. WHAT WE’RE REALLY STRUGGLING FOR IS OUR LAND. ABOVE ALL ELSE THIS IS WHAT WE NEED.’ ARAU, PENAN MAN, SARAWAK, MALAYSIA, 2007 contents * 1 INTRODUCTION: LAND AND LIFE 1 2 LONG-TERM IMPACTS OF SETTLEMENT ON HEALTH 10 3 IDENTITY, FREEDOM AND MENTAL HEALTH 22 4 MATERNAL AND SEXUAL HEALTH 28 5 HEALTHCARE 33 6 CONCLUSION: HEALTH AND FUTURE 42 Introduction: Land and Life Across the world, from the poorest to ‘We are not poor or primitive. * the richest countries, indigenous peoples We Yanomami are very rich. Rich today experience chronic ill health. They in our culture, our language and endure the worst of the diseases that our land. We don’t need money accompany poverty and, simultaneously, or possessions. What we need many suffer from ‘diseases of affluence’ is respect: respect for our culture – such as cancers and obesity – despite and respect for our land rights.’ often receiving few of the benefits of Davi Kopenawa Yanomami, Brazil 1995. ‘development’. Diabetes alone threatens the very survival of many indigenous Tribal peoples who have suffered communities in rich countries.3 Indigenous colonisation, forced settlement, peoples also experience serious mental assimilation policies and other ‘You napëpë [whites] talk about health problems and have high levels forms of marginalisation and removal what you call “development” and of substance abuse and suicide. The from ancestral lands almost always tell us to become the same as you.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Access and Dispossession in Botswana's Central Kalahari Game
    Fall 08 2013 216 Rethinking the human right to water: Water access and dispossession in Botswana’s Central Kalahari Game Reserve Cynthia Morinville and Lucy Rodina Institute For Resources, Environment and Sustainability, The University oF British Columbia2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, CanadaCorresponding author: [email protected] Final Version: C. Morinville and L. Rodina. 2013. Rethinking the human right to water: Water access and dispossession in Botswana’s Central Kalahari Game Reserve. GeoForum 49: 150- 159.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoForum.2013.06.012Citation oF this work should use the Final version as noted above. Rethinking the Human Right to Water: Water Access and Dispossession in Botswana’s Central Kalahari Game Reserve Abstract This paper engages debates regarding the human right to water through an exploration the recent legal battle between San and Bakgalagadi and the government of Botswana regarding access to water in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve. The paper reviews the legal events that led to the realization of the human right to water through a decision of the Court of Appeal of Botswana in 2011 and the discursive context in which these events took place. We offer a contextual evaluation of the processes that allowed the actual realization of the human right to water for the residents of the Central Kalahari Game Reserve, revisiting and extending dominant lines of inquiry related to the human right to water in policy and academic debates. Adding to these discussions, we suggest the use of ‘dispossession’ as an analytical lens is a useful starting point for a conceptual reframing of the human right to water.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Agreement
    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the date on which the last signatures have been affixed hereto (“Effective Date”), by and between, Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice, Center for Biological Diversity, Coalition for Clean Air, Sierra Club, and San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society (collectively, “Petitioner Parties”), and Highland Fairview Properties, HF Properties, Sunnymead Properties, Theodore Properties Partners, 13451 Theodore, LLC, and HL Property Partners (collectively, “Highland Fairview”), and each of them, which are referred to cumulatively as the “Parties” or singularly as a “Party.” RECITALS WHEREAS, Highland Fairview is the applicant for a master-planned development project encompassing the development of up to 40.6 million square feet of building area and all necessary infrastructure to support large-scale logistics operations (“World Logistics Center Project”) located on approximately 2,610 acres of largely vacant land south of State Route 60 and north of the San Jacinto Wildlife Area in the Rancho Belago area of the City of Moreno Valley (“Property”); WHEREAS, in August 2015, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”), through its City Council, approved the World Logistics Center Project and certified a final environmental impact report (“FEIR”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); WHEREAS, the City’s August 2015 approval of the World Logistics Center Project consisted of (a) a Specific Plan to govern the World Logistics Center Project’s
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Administrator Wheeler
    April 23, 2019 Andrew Wheeler Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of the Administrator, 1101A 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] Re: Public Involvement and Transparency in EPA’s Potential Revisions to Clean Water Act Section 401 Guidance and Regulations Dear Administrator Wheeler: On behalf of the undersigned groups, we write to object to the lack of public involvement contemplated in any review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) regulations and guidance related to Clean Water Act Section 401, including guidance entitled Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification: A Water Quality Protection Tool for States and Tribes (“Section 401 Guidance”). We also object to any resulting revisions to or replacement of existing regulations and guidance that undermine the essential role of States and Tribes in protecting water quality under the Clean Water Act. Section 401 gives States and authorized Tribes the power to review any project applying for a federal license or permit that may result in a discharge into the State or Tribe’s navigable waters. 33 U.S.C. § 1341; see also id. § 1377(e). By passing Section 401, Congress created a system where the States and authorized Tribes have the authority “to act to deny a permit and thereby prevent a Federal license or permit from issuing to a discharge source within such [jurisdiction].” S.D. Warren Co. v. Me. Bd. of Envtl. Protection, 547 U.S. 370, 380 (2006) (quoting S. Rep. No. 92-414, 69 (1971)). The States and Tribes’ power over proposed federal projects’ potential impacts to the quality of local waterways and wetlands is “essential in the [Clean Water Act’s] scheme to preserve state authority to address a broad range of pollution.” Id.
    [Show full text]