DOCSLIB.ORG

Topic 5: Voting Behaviour in the UK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Topic 5: Voting Behaviour in the UK LONG-TERM / STRUCTURAL FACTORS IN VOTING BEHAVIOUR From the Q directory ->Politics folder, open the Pol Voter Group Figures spreadsheet Have a look at sheet 1 with a summary of how different social groups voted in the past few elections -> class discussion. In groups – you will be looking at one aspect of social structures: Gender, ethnicity, age, class or regional patterns of voting. Gender – Ethnicity – Age – Class – Regional – Use the relevant worksheet on the spreadsheet. You should use the links as well as the data on the worksheet. For your aspect: - How much variation is there in voting behaviour in the most recent election? - Why might such variations exist? - How important does this aspect appear to be in determining voter behaviour today? - To what extent has voter behaviour changed in this aspect over the past few elections? - Why might change have occurred? - Are there any problems with the data – what other research would be valuable? Outcome: - to produce a handout of 1 – 2 sides for the rest of the class, which you will talk through on __________________ (you could also project material on screen but this is not necessary). Questions will also be asked. - Your handout should answer the questions above and should ensure that each answer is supported from the data provided – this will probably involve graphs. Time-frame: - 2 double periods in the IT rooms + 1 week’s homework Extension work Additional resources on voting behaviour - http://www.earlhamsociologypages.co.uk/Voting%20Behaviour%20in%20the%20UK%20194 5-2005.ppt There are additional links about the influence of religion on voting behaviour on the last tab of the spreadsheet. and an interesting article is copied in below – what assumptions does it make about Voting Behaviour? From The Times August 14, 2008 Would you pass or fail the Kinnock Test? The British voter never gets it wrong. At every election in the past 80 years the right party has won. Discuss Daniel Finkelstein I can't remember if I've told you about the Kinnock Test. I don't think I have. It's my party piece. Perhaps that's why I don't get invited to very many parties. The Kinnock Test is this - do you, on reflection, think it would have been a good idea for the country if Neil Kinnock had been elected Prime Minister in 1992? Naturally I don't bother asking Tories this question, since, on the whole, their answers wouldn't be interesting. But I find the responses I get from Labour people endlessly fascinating. Particularly the replies I get from Blairites. You see, for all that the Conservatives fell apart in the 1992 parliament, I still think it was clear that a Kinnock government would have been worse. No one needs to tell me how bad things got by 1997, because I was there (I always insist on the retention of that comma). But still I assert with confidence that the voters did the right thing putting the Conservatives back in power. Neil Kinnock was entirely unsuited to being Prime Minister. His endless whirling speeches showed that. As John Major pricelessly commented, as Kinnock didn't know what he was saying, he never knew when he had finished saying it. And alongside this unsuitability was Labour's programme, still only partly modernised and containing a ragtag of unfunded spending promises and threats of greater regulation. Some Blairites understand this. They would, as I would cheekily put it, pass the Kinnock Test. Party unity might make public confession difficult but I reckon Alan Milburn and Stephen Byers would both pass the Kinnock Test. I would think Blair's old pollster Philip Gould would pass it too, for all that he worked incredibly hard to get Kinnock elected. And Blair himself? That's a no brainer. On the other hand I am sure that Charles Clarke thinks Kinnock as premier would have been a capital idea. And Blair advisers Alastair Campbell and Peter Hyman would fail the test too. James Purnell? Pass. David Miliband? Fail. The Kinnock Test is thus an important way of classifying Blairites. A Blairite who thinks Kinnock would have been a good prime minister must believe that Blair's changes were mainly necessary in order to get elected. A Blairite who passes the Kinnock Test accepts that Blair's changes were required in order for Labour to be fit to govern. There is quite a big difference between those two positions. As I pestered my centre left friends, one of them provided a striking response. Not only, he said, did the electorate get it right in 1992, he couldn't think of a single election since universal suffrage in 1928 where the voters had got the election wrong. And you know what? I think my friend has got a point. The proposition is that in every contest in these last 80 years the party that was more fit to govern has been victorious. Sometimes both of the main offerings were weak and unappealing, often the winner wasn't much good, but always the winner was better able to conduct the business of government than was the loser. There are a number of elections for which this proposition is, if hardly uncontroversial, still clearly correct. I thinks this holds for 1931 (where the National Government swept home, Labour having collapsed in disarray), 1935 (another National victory); 1945 (Labour's landslide); 1955 and 1959 (Tories defeating a divided and incoherent Labour opposition); 1964 and 1966 (Wilson's triumphs over the tired and outdated Tories); and for 1979, 1983, 1987 and 1992 (the market revolution having to be drummed into Labour's head until they at least partly got the point). My contribution is to admit that even though I voted Conservative in 1997, 2001 and 2005 and wanted to see the party advance, it wasn't ready to govern. This leaves a few contests to argue over. In 1929 Stanley Baldwin probably deserved to lose, having run on the slogan “Safety First” - an unbelievably complacent thing to do with unemployment running at 10 per cent. And Labour probably deserved its first proper chance to govern, even though it made a mess of it fairly rapidly. But the question of who was the better isn't clear cut. Then again, neither was the election result - the Tories had more votes, Labour more seats and no one had a majority. Right, in the circumstances. Some might wonder about Labour being overhauled by the Conservatives over the two elections of 1950 and 1951. Yet this is because, since its passing, the Attlee Government has been canonised. At the time it was exhausted (in some cases literally dying), weak, out of ideas and incapable of responding to the aspirations of consumers. It needed to be replaced - right again. When I have tried this out with colleagues, it is the elections of 1970 and 1974 that lead to the most debate. Those on the Left give 1970 as the big error by voters, while those on the Right think that in 1974 voters gave the wrong answer to Heath's question: “Who governs Britain?” In effect, the electorate answered: “The unions.” What made it hard for voters to get it right in those elections, of course, was that no right answer was available (and don't say the Liberals, who were led by a man about to be charged with conspiracy to murder). Both Heath and Wilson were on the wrong track entirely. But I think it was, on balance, the best of a bad job to put Heath in and then to boot him out. In 1974 Wilson's crew weren't fit to govern but Heath's management of the economy had been so spectacularly, bewilderingly bad that turning to almost any alternative might be excused. Do the victors just feel like the right answer because they won? Probably, a little bit. But I think that there is more to it than that. I think the history of the past 80 years shows that for all its terrible flaws, there is still something rather wondrous about British democracy. [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contemporary Left Antisemitism
    “David Hirsh is one of our bravest and most thoughtful scholar-activ- ists. In this excellent book of contemporary history and political argu- ment, he makes an unanswerable case for anti-anti-Semitism.” —Anthony Julius, Professor of Law and the Arts, UCL, and author of Trials of the Diaspora (OUP, 2010) “For more than a decade, David Hirsh has campaigned courageously against the all-too-prevalent demonisation of Israel as the one national- ism in the world that must not only be criticised but ruled altogether illegitimate. This intellectual disgrace arouses not only his indignation but his commitment to gather evidence and to reason about it with care. What he asks of his readers is an equal commitment to plumb how it has happened that, in a world full of criminality and massacre, it is obsessed with the fundamental wrongheadedness of one and only national movement: Zionism.” —Todd Gitlin, Professor of Journalism and Sociology, Columbia University, USA “David Hirsh writes as a sociologist, but much of the material in his fascinating book will be of great interest to people in other disciplines as well, including political philosophers. Having participated in quite a few of the events and debates which he recounts, Hirsh has done a commendable service by deftly highlighting an ugly vein of bigotry that disfigures some substantial portions of the political left in the UK and beyond.” —Matthew H. Kramer FBA, Professor of Legal & Political Philosophy, Cambridge University, UK “A fierce and brilliant rebuttal of one of the Left’s most pertinacious obsessions. What makes David Hirsh the perfect analyst of this disorder is his first-hand knowledge of the ideologies and dogmata that sustain it.” —Howard Jacobson, Novelist and Visiting Professor at New College of Humanities, London, UK “David Hirsh’s new book Contemporary Left Anti-Semitism is an impor- tant contribution to the literature on the longest hatred.
    [Show full text]
  • 4999P PR HANDBOOK 00-20.Qxd 17/9/07 16:10 Page 34
    4999P PR HANDBOOK 00-20.qxd 17/9/07 16:10 Page 34 Public relations, 3 politics and the media Ian Somerville and Emma Wood Chapter aims In this chapter we will focus on an increasingly important phenomenon in contemporary democratic societies, namely, the intersection of politics, public relations (PR) and the media. We will assess the growth of the use of specialist media managers by politicians, and in particular by governments, which is a feature of most Western democratic societies where the presentation of policies and personalities in a media-saturated age is viewed as key to attaining and maintaining political power. The importance of good presentation is hardly a radical new idea in politics but the increasing reliance on ‘buying in’ PR expertise in this vital area has been controversial, to say the least. Introduction ony Blair ‘the master of spin, the great performer’ (The Sunday Telegraph, 13 May 2007, p. 25) announced his resignation as Prime Minister of the UK on 10 May T 2007. Tony Blair’s period in office was characterised for many by an unparalleled rise in PR in all socio-economic spheres and particularly in political culture. Now with this era ending there are some who claim there is a chance to develop a political process where some of the worst excesses of the Blair administration have no place: ‘I am sure this will mean the end of spin. The whole country is tired of spin’ (Lord Paul in The Sunday Times, 13 May, 2007, p. 14). Spin, and indeed the whole PR industry, has sustained fierce criticism for playing a role which has been to the detriment of journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL the Association of Jewish Refugees
    VOLUME 19 NO.12 DECEMBER 2019 JOURNAL The Association of Jewish Refugees What to CHANUKAH GREETINGS Last month was a very busy time for Leave Behind the AJR, with events remembering Kristallnacht, Refugee Voices and our Northern volunteers all in addition When Esther Saraga’s mother died, she left behind boxes and to our normal packed Outreach programme of regional events. You’ll envelopes full of papers and photographs. “They were in sideboards find details of these and other events in this Journal. and cupboards,” writes Esther, “in the loft and in the garage. Some were simply stuffed at the back of drawers.” We are also proud to report on some of the educational projects that we are currently funding, on page 13. © FREUD MUSEUM LONDON 2019 has been a turbulent year for many different people, in many different ways. As it draws to a close we wish you a happy Chanukah and holiday season Refugee Voices Archive ................................ 3 Atomic Spy Klaus Fuchs ............................... 4 Letter from Israel. ......................................... 5 Letters to the Editor ...................................6-7 Art Notes...................................................... 8 European Views ........................................... 9 Every life tells a story .................................. 10 A trip to Vojvodina ..................................... 11 Holocaust education update..................12-13 Around the AJR .....................................14-15 Reviews .................................................16-17
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Hislop's Right
    Academic rigour, journalistic flair EPA/Andy Rain Ian Hislop’s right: Murdoch’s cosy relationship with Tories should be investigated October 28, 2016 12.18pm BST The reciprocal closeness in the relationship between journalism and power is a prominent Author feature of British political history. In times of war or national crisis, media organisations are expected more often than not to behave as if they were an arm of government – but, for the newspapers of Rupert Murdoch, this close relationship seems to have become business as usual, whoever is living in Number 10 . And the willingness of various governments to John Jewell yield to Rupert Murdoch’s news empire has been exhaustively documented. Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University We know by the media mogul’s own admission that he often entered Downing Street “by the back door” and, as journalist Anthony Hilton noted in February of this year: I once asked Rupert Murdoch why he was so opposed to the European Union. “That’s easy,” he replied. “When I go into Downing Street they do what I say; when I go to Brussels they take no notice.” It is increasingly clear that the influence of News UK (the rebranded News International whose titles include the Sun, the Sun on Sunday, The Times and the Sunday Times) has not diminished in the aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry or the phone-hacking scandals. Far from it. When Theresa May visited New York in late September (mere months after becoming prime minister) she found time in her hectic 36-hour schedule to meet with Murdoch.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on America
    DANIEL FINKELSTEIN LOUISE MENSCH celebrates the modern on what the Tories are conservatism of Martin doing wrong and Chris The Luther King Christie’s doing right Progressive Conscience Spotlight on America Bush adviser David Frum issues a warning for Cameron and tells Bright Blue his regrets “Iraq: it’s on my mind all the time. Every day.” senator olympia snowe | iain martin | jesse norman | stephen pollard J1025 The Progressive Conscience COVER.indd 1-2 23/09/2013 12:24 AMERICA BOOKS AND ARTS Contents Opening an American mind Brooks Newmark, the American-born MP and KATE MALTBY is the Editor of Contributors EditorialVice-President of the Harvard Alumni Association, The Progressive Conscience. NIGEL CAMERON is CEO of the tells British students to head to the Ivy League Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies Justin Timberlake brought sexy back. Sir Thomas Wyatt of The Progressive Conscience takes ‘America’ as its theme. I’m LUKE COFFEY is the Margaret brought sonnets back. As of the Labour Party conference, Ed particularly proud that Olympia Snowe has drawn on her long Thatcher Fellow at The Heritage course in Britain is generally broken This ultimately leads to a very P18 P29 P32 Foundation Miliband is ‘bringingBROOKS NEWMARK socialism has back’. served For the third time, per- career as a deal-brokering Republican Senator to write for us as a Government Whip, Lord down into three terms over a three year different undergraduate experience. OLIVER COOPER is the Chairman haps, it’s good news for Tories. on cross-party dialogue. Daniel Finkelstein, Stephen Pollard Commissioner HM Treasury, period – although Scottish courses tend I found the student bodies at both of Conservative Future But is he? George W Bush’s economic advisor, David Frum, and Iain Martin lend us their expertise on lessons from recent 03 Editorial 18 David Frum: After Bush and was a Member of the to involve a four year degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Lights Public Policy and the Geography of Political Attitudes Neil O’Brien and Anthony Wells Northern Lights
    Northern Lights Public Policy and the Geography of Political Attitudes Neil O’Brien and Anthony Wells Northern Lights Public policy and the geography of political attitudes Neil O’Brien and Anthony Wells Policy Exchange is an independent think tank whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas which will foster a free society based on strong communities, personal freedom, limited government, national self-confidence and an enterprise culture. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Daniel Finkelstein (Chairman of the Board), Richard Ehrman (Deputy Chair), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Simon Brocklebank-Fowler, Robin Edwards, Virginia Fraser, Edward Heathcoat Amory, David Meller, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Andrew Sells, Tim Steel, Rachel Whetstone and Simon Wolfson. About the authors Neil O’Brien is the Director of Policy Exchange. He was previously director of Open Europe, a cross-party think tank working for free market reform in Europe. Neil grew up in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, and took a first in Politics, Philosophy and Economics, at Christ Church, Oxford. His interests include economic reform and social policy. Anthony Wells is Associate Director of YouGov’s political and social opinion polling and currently runs their media polling operation for the Sun and Sunday Times.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report October 2011–September 2013
    HOUSE OF LORDS APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT October 2011 to September 2013 House of Lords Appointments Commission Page 3 Contents Section 1: The Appointments Commission 5 Section 2: Appointments of non-party-political peers 8 Section 3: Vetting party-political nominees 11 Annex A: Biographies of the Commission 14 Annex B: Individuals vetted by the Commission 16 and appointed to the House of Lords [Group photo] Page 4 Section 1 The Appointments Commission 1. In May 2000 the Prime Minister established the House of Lords Appointments Commission as an independent, advisory, non-departmental public body. Commission Membership 2. The Commission has seven members, including the Chairman. Three members represent the main political parties and ensure that the Commission has expert knowledge of the House of Lords. The other members, including the Chairman, are independent of government and political parties. The independent members were appointed in October 2008 by open competition, in accordance with the code of the Commissioner for Public Appointments. The party-political members are all members of the House of Lords and were nominated by the respective party leader in November 2010 for three year terms. 3. The terms of all members therefore come to an end in the autumn of 2013. 4. Biographies of the Commission members can be seen at Annex A. 5. The Commission is supported by a small secretariat at 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ. Role of the House of Lords Appointments Commission 6. The role of the Commission is to: make recommendations for the appointment of non-party-political members of the House of Lords; and vet for propriety recommendations to the House of Lords, including those put forward by the political parties and Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • By David Moss, 17 June 2007 in a Recent Column1 in the Times, Daniel
    A CONSERVATIVE HOME AFFAIRS NARRATIVE by David Moss, 17 June 2007 In a recent column1 in the Times, Daniel Finkelstein administered a cold shower to the Conservative Party. He confessed himself appalled at their recalcitrance. They need to change. They need to move to the centre. And he threw down the gauntlet: Some may think that there is a brilliant, attractive, right-wing synthesis, a magical narrative that obviates the need for any concessions to the centre. Well, if there is, please don’t keep the secret to yourself. Share it with the rest of us. What follows2 is a response to that challenge. In summary: • If you believe that elections are won on the centre ground and you believe, as Mr Finkelstein appears to, that the Conservatives are right-wing extremists, then pre- sumably you also believe that the Party might as well shut up shop. • And if you keep telling people that Labour occupy the centre ground, then what are you telling them? Answer, it is quite safe to vote Labour. In what sense, in that case, is Mr Finkelstein's a Conservative strategy? • The suggestion in this paper is that the Finkelstein analysis is wrong. The Conserva- tives are not right-wing extremists. And, with respect to home affairs, Tony Blair and the Labour Party do not occupy the centre ground. Far from it, they are fanatics. • After three catastrophic general election results, as Mr Finkelstein says, you do not need a PhD to work out that changes are essential. But what changes? The point is made in this paper that the Conservative Party's changes must be principled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Justine Greening MP
    Centre Write Autumn 2017 Conservatism refresh The Rt Hon Justine Greening MP | Jacob Rees-Mogg MP | The Rt Hon Ken Clarke MP | Sir Craig Oliver SAVE THE CHILDREN Hyams the Children/Jonathan Save Photo: ANNUAL RECEPTION Speakers include: Co-hosted by The Rt Hon Priti Patel MP Secretary of State for International Development ConservativeHome The Rt Hon Stephen Crabb MP Tuesday 3 October Paul Goodman 9.30pm – 11pm Editor, ConservativeHome Charter 4 Kevin Watkins Chief Executive, Save the Children Manchester Central Refreshments will be provided, wheelchair accessible RSVP to: [email protected] Registered charity England and Wales (213890) Scotland (SC039570) Party Conference Flyer 148x210_v4.indd 2 18/09/2017 12:27 CONTENS 3 Contents EDITORIAL Brexit together Editor’s letter Syed Kamall MEP 12 Laura Round 5 Director’s note SUCCESSFUL CONSERVATISM Ryan Shorthouse 6 Her secret... Letters to the editor 7 Lord Willetts 16 Beware Corbyn CONSERVATISM AT A CROSSROADS Kate Maltby 18 Contents for conservatism End of the insurgency? Julian Glover 8 Douglas Carswell 19 Time for more state? Dialogue with Lord Finkelstein, Nicky Sam Bowman and David Skelton 10 Morgan, Jacob Rees-Mogg & Craig Oliver 20 Page 8 Julian Glover Page 34 The Rt explores what’s next Hon Ken Clarke Bright Blue is an independent for conservatism MP reflects on his think tank and pressure group time in parliament for liberal conservatism. Director: Ryan Shorthouse Page 28 The Centre Write Chair: Matthew d’Ancona interview: The Rt Hon Board of Directors: Rachel
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Book Brooks Newmark MP, Minister for Civil Society
    For this agenda-setting collection, the leading civil society umbrella groups ACEVO and CAF worked with Conservative MPs and commentators to showcase some of the party’s thinking about its future relationship with The charities and social enterprises. The accompanying ‘Red Book’ and ‘Yellow Book’ feature similar essays from the Labour and Liberal Democrat Blue Book Parties. The ‘This is an innovative and ground-breaking project that has brought together a range of my colleagues in close dialogue with two of the best- known and best-respected organizations in our country’s formidable charity and social enterprise sector.’ the Voluntary of Sector Blue Book Brooks Newmark MP, Minister for Civil Society ‘It is a good moment … to look back at the last four years and assess the of the state of politics and its relationship with the voluntary sector. That is what this essay collection seeks to do.’ Sir Stephen Bubb, Chief Executive, ACEVO Voluntary Sector ‘[These ideas] should be of interest to whichever party (or parties) form the next government. The challenge will be to turn these ideas into meaningful policies that enable charities to play the central role in society Civil Society and the Conservative that we all know they can.’ Party after the 2015 election Dr John Low CBE, Chief Executive, Charities Aid Foundation With contributions by John Glen MP, Nick Hurd MP, Danny Kruger, Kwasi Kwarteng MP, Charlotte Leslie MP, Brooks Newmark MP, Sarah Newton MP, Jesse Norman MP, Dominic Raab MP and Chris White MP. With a foreword by Brooks Newmark
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Finkelstein OBE
    Lord Daniel Finkelstein OBE Associate Editor of The Times & Former Head of Policy for the Conservave Party Lord Finkelstein OBE, is a former polician, he is currently Associate Editor of The Times, their Chief Leader Writer and a weekly polical columnist. Before joining The Times in 2001, he was adviser to both Prime Minister John Major and Conservave leader William Hague. TOPICS: IN DETAIL: The Current Political Scene Daniel Finkelstein graduated from the London School of Economics, where he Government Affairs studied economics & polics. He was awarded the OBE in the 1997 honours list. The European Political Forum Between 1981 and 1990 he was a member of the SDP, becoming Chair of the UK Politics Young Social Democrats during the 1983 general elecon campaign. Before Economics working for the Conservave Party, Daniel Finkelstein was Director of the think tank the Social Market Foundaon for three years. Between 1995 and 1997 LANGUAGES: Finkelstein was Director of the Conservave Research Department. Between 1997 and 2001 he was polical adviser to the Leader of the Opposion Rt. Hon He presents in English. William Hague MP, and, together with George Osborne, Secretary to the Shadow Cabinet. He is the chairman of Policy Exchange and was elevated to the House of Lords in August 2013. His blog, Comment Central, is a personal round up of the best polical opinion on the web. WHAT HE OFFERS YOU: Daniel Finkelstein is a prominent media commentator, well known for his regular appearances on Newsnight's polical panel. He expertly provides a tour d'horizon of the current polical scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Too 'Nice' to Be Tories?
    Too ‘nice’ to be Tories? How the Modernisers have damaged the Conservative Party i TOO ‘NICE’ TO BE TORIES? Too ‘nice’ to be Tories? How the Modernisers have damaged the Conservative Party Anthony Scholefield and Gerald Frost ii Too ‘nice’ to be Tories? How the Modernisers have damaged the Conservative Party Anthony Scholefield and Gerald Frost iii TOO ‘NICE’ TO BE TORIES? CONTENTS About the Authors vii Acknowledgements viii © The Social Affairs Unit 20092011 All rights reserved Executive summary ix British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Introduction xii A catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library Chapter One Return to the middle ground x1 All views expressed in this publication are those of the author, not those of the Social Affairs Unit, its Trustees, Advisers or Director Chapter Two Where have all the voters gone? 15 Printed and bound in the United Kingdom Chapter Three What the data demonstrates – 26 Designed by [email protected] and what it doesn’t ISBN-13:xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 978-1-904863–36–6 ISBN: 978-1-904863-61-8 Chapter Four Failure at the polls: how UKIP’s 33 intervention cost the Tories an overall majority Social Affairs Unit 314–322 Regent Street London W1B 5SA Chapter Five Electoral consequences, 42 www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk policy consequences The Social Affairs Unit has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
    [Show full text]