DOCSLIB.ORG

Maryland Historical Trust Preservation, Survey, and Museum Funding Needs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maryland Historical Trust Preservation, Survey, and Museum Funding Needs Maryland Historical Trust Preservation, Survey, and Museum Funding Needs Report to the Chairmen of the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and House Appropriations Committee October 15, 2016 Photo: Historic Sotterley Historic Photo: Photo: Frederick Historic Sites Consortium Sites Historic Frederick Photo: Ridgley Rosenwald School Sotterley Plantation Catoctin Furnace Prince George’s County St. Mary’s County Frederick County Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 In my travels around the state I am About this Report 6 always impressed by the incredible work our local preservationists, muse- Background: MHT’s Grant Programs 7 ums and municipalities are accomplish- Non-Capital Historic Preservation Grant 8 ing to protect, promote and save their Program: Survey, Planning, and Education history and heritage. But my attention Capital Historic Preservation Grant Program: 26 is also drawn to the places we aren’t Bricks-and-Mortar Restoration and Rehabilitation saving or have lost. The number one question our organization receives is Museum Assistance Grant Programs: 35 Operations, Programs, and Projects where to find the necessary funding to help preserve important places. Un- Experience of Neighboring States 46 fortunately, the current answer is that Recommendations 48 there are very few sources and it’s our hope that we can work collaboratively with our state partners to change that and make Maryland a model once again for historic preservation. -Nicholas Redding, Executive Director, Preservation Maryland Table of Contents 3 4 Executive Summary Historic preservation puts the power of his- land General Assembly, the Chairmen of the • Exploring diversification of funding streams tory to work, prompting communities to Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and for the MHT Grant Fund; identify what is important to them and to use House Appropriations Committee directed these sites and stories to enrich people’s lives MHT to work with partners to evaluate the • Prioritizing funding for threatened today. State government plays an invaluable state of its historic preservation and museum resources; role in preserving our state’s history and our grant programs. The following report ad- collective sense of place. Through our partner- dresses specific issues identified by legislators • Supporting State Agency and local commu- ships with local communities, the Maryland including need and demand for this type of nity research and survey needs; and Historical Trust (MHT), Maryland’s State State support, funding options, staff capacity Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), assists to administer these programs, and the experi- • Leveraging partnerships with affinity orga- with the identification, protection, and re-use ence of other states. nizations to streamline the delivery of State of those sites that represent the many people, funding. places, and events that have shaped our state As this report demonstrates, the unmet needs identity. of the state’s historic preservation and history museum community are substantial. Threats For many years, Maryland was a national to our tangible and intangible cultural heri- leader in providing support for the preserva- tage continue to grow. State and federal tion and interpretation of our irreplaceable sources of funding for cultural resource pres- heritage. Historic preservation and history ervation have all but disappeared, leaving our museum assistance programs were supported local government and private sector partners by the MHT Grant Fund, a continuing, non- with few options. lapsing special fund authorized under State Finance and Procurement Article §5A-328 of The findings of this report are clear - our local the Annotated Code of Maryland. Despite partners can’t do it alone. Recommendations demonstrated demand for these programs, for how we can help Marylanders to identify appropriations to the MHT Grant Fund were and protect our shared heritage include: suspended beginning in fiscal year 2012. • Restoring funding to the MHT Grant Fund At the close of the 2016 session of the Mary- as soon as possible; Executive Summary 5 About this Report The Report on the Fiscal 2017 State Operating • Coalition of Maryland Heritage Areas through our partners’ distribution lists to so- Budget (SB190) and the State Capital Budget • Council for Maryland Archeology licit feedback more broadly, with excellent (SB 191) and Related Recommendations by the • Main Street Maryland Program results. Observations gathered from survey Chairmen of the Senate Budget and Taxa- • Maryland Advisory Committee on respondents, both quantitative and anecdotal, tion Committee and House Appropriations Archeology are highlighted throughout this document. Committee (otherwise known as the Joint • Maryland Association of Historic District Outreach to SHPOs across the country yield- Chairmen’s Report, or JCR) requested that Commissions ed information on funding programs nation- the Maryland Department of Planning work • Maryland Commission on African wide and provided both alternative models with the Department of Budget and Manage- American History and Culture and a context for understanding Maryland’s ment and preservation advocates to identify • Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs approach to historic preservation and muse- the need and demand for preservation, sur- • Maryland Department of Natural um funding. MHT presented a draft report vey, and museum (operating and capital) Resources to partners in early August and held telecon- grant funding and future plans to address • Maryland Department of Housing ferences to review the findings. The draft these statewide needs. The report was to also and Community Development report was adjusted based on these conversa- address potential innovative funding options • Maryland Humanities tions and the final document was prepared for available, the experience of nearby states, and • Maryland Museums Association submission to the General Assembly. the staff capacity necessary to administer these • Maryland State Arts Council programs. • Preservation Maryland The success of MHT’s programs and projects • Small Museum Association has always relied on a broad base of support, In response, the Maryland Historical Trust both on the statewide level and within local (MHT), a division of the Maryland Depart- Representatives of these statewide histori- communities. Our partners’ input and in- ment of Planning and Maryland’s State His- cal and cultural organizations were invited volvement in the development of this report toric Preservation Office (SHPO) for the pur- to meet in May 2016 at the MHT offices in attests to the continued strength of that net- poses of the National Historic Preservation Crownsville, Maryland to discuss funding work and the incredible need that remains Act, convened a working group comprised of needs, growing threats to Maryland’s his- unfulfilled. the Department of Budget and Management toric and cultural resources, and opportuni- and representatives from the following orga- ties to reimagine State support for sites and nization to collaboratively address preserva- landmarks. Based on their input, MHT staff tion and museum funding issues. developed an online survey instrument that • The Archeological Society of Maryland was sent directly to MHT stakeholders and 6 About this Report Background: MHT’s Grant Programs Thanks to widespread support for historic Historical and Cultural Museum Assistance State funds were vital in making Mary- preservation both in local communities and Program (Museum Assistance Program). among elected officials, the Maryland His- land the national leader in protecting torical Trust has offered grant funding since Despite demonstrated need, appropria- America’s heritage. If these funds were FY1978, beginning with grants for bricks- tions for the Grant Fund were suspended by and-mortar preservation activities. Over the FY2012. MHT does still offer capital grants re-instated, they would provide essen- years, the MHT Grant Fund expanded be- through the African American Heritage Pres- tial support for historic and archaeo- yond physical preservation and grew to en- ervation Program (AAHPP) and supports compass a broad range of projects including heritage tourism projects within areas desig- logical sites, places, and museums that survey and documentation of historic proper- nated under the Maryland Heritage Areas Au- currently do not have any source of ties, preservation and disaster planning, Na- thority (MHAA). However, both programs tional Register nominations, and support for are extremely competitive, and many projects funds to expand preservation efforts history and heritage museums. Demand for which would have been eligible for grants throughout the entire State. Research these programs consistently and overwhelm- from MHT’s Grant Fund are simply not eli- ingly exceeded the availability of funds. gible for these programs. and survey of our lost and hidden past once benefited from State support. Re- Today, the MHT Grant Fund is a continuing, non-lapsing special fund authorized under investment in the full array of pres- State Finance and Procurement Article §5A- ervation funding for all of Maryland’s 328, Annotated Code of Maryland, primar- ily consisting of money appropriated to the history and heritage is incumbent on MHT Grant Program (Historic Preservation our decision-makers. Grant Program) or the Historical and Cultur- al Museum Assistance Program. MHT uti- -Donna Ware, lizes the Grant Fund for the Historic Preserva- Senior Vice President, tion Grant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maryland Women's Heritage Trail
    MARYLAND WOMEN’S HERITAGE TRAIL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021 A A ALLEGANY COUNTY WASHINGTON COUNTY CECIL COUNTY GARRETT COUNTY CARROLL COUNTY HARFORD COUNTY B B BALTIMORE COUNTY FREDERICK COUNTY C C BALTIMORE CITY KENT COUNTY D ollowollow thethe footstepsfootsteps HOWARD COUNTY D ollow the footsteps and wander the paths where in Southern Maryland, to scientists, artists, writers, FMaryland women have built our State through- educators, athletes, civic, business and religious MONTGOMERY COUNTY F QUEEN ANNE’S out history. Follow this trail of tales and learn about leaders in every region and community. Visit these ANNE ARUNDEL E COUNTY E the contributions made by women of diverse back- sites and learn about women’s accomplishments. COUNTY grounds throughout Maryland – from waterwomen Follow in the footsteps of inspirational Maryland on the Eastern Shore to craftswomen of Western women and honor our grandmothers, mothers, Maryland, to civil rights activists of Baltimore and aunts, cousins, daughters and sisters whose contri- F Central Maryland, to women who worked the land butions have shaped our history. F Washington D.C. TALBOT WESTERN MARYLAND REGION PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY ALLEGANY COUNTY Anna Eleanor Roosevelt Memorial Tree COUNTY CAROLINE G Chesapeake and Ohio (C&0) Canal National Historic Park Gladys Noon Spellman Parkway COUNTY G Jane Frazier House Adele H. Stamp Student Union Elizabeth Tasker Lowndes Home Mary Surratt House The Woodyard Archeological Site FREDERICK COUNTY CALVERT H Beatty-Creamer House H Nancy Crouse House CENTRAL MARYLAND REGION CHARLES COUNTY COUNTY Barbara Fritchie Home ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY Hood College Annapolis High School Ladiesburg Banneker-Douglass Museum National Museum of Civil War Medicine DORCHESTER COUNTY Charles Carroll House of Annapolis National Shrine of Elizabeth Ann Seton Chase-Lloyd House Helen Smith House and Studio I Coffee House I Steiner House/Home of the WICOMICO COUNTY Government House Frederick Women’s Civic Club ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocomoke City Comprehehsive Master Plan 2014
    POCOMOKE CITY COMPREHEHSIVE MASTER PLAN 2014 Adopted by Resolution October 6, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS & CREDITS MAYOR AND COUNCIL _____________________________________________________________________________________ Bruce Morrison, Mayor George Tasker, Councilman Diane Downing, Councilwoman R. Dale Trotter, Councilman Tracey Cottman, Councilwoman Rob Clarke, Councilman PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION _____________________________________________________________________________________ Kennis Austin, Chairman Royce Smith John Rafter James H. Porter, Jr., Attorney STAFF _____________________________________________________________________________________ Russell W. Blake, City Manager Carol L. Justice, City Clerk Paula Sparrow, Secretary/Asst. City Clerk‐ CONSULTANT _____________________________________________________________________________________ Peter Johnston & Associates, LLC RESOLUTION NO. 485 A RESOLUTION OF THE POCOMOKE CITY MAYOR AND COUNCIL TO ADOPT “THE COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN” AS PREPARED AND RECOMMENDED BY THE POCOMOKE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, The Comprehensive Master Plan for Pocomoke City is a long range general guide for governing the future physical development within the Pocomoke City Planning area and adjacent to Pocomoke City for the next six (6)-ten (10) years, and WHEREAS, the Pocomoke City Planning and Zoning Commission has worked with a professional planning consultant to develop the proposed Plan, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Pocomoke City Planning and Zoning Commission on September
    [Show full text]
  • April 30, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell the Honorable Nancy
    April 30, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable Charles Schumer The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Minority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Leader McConnell, Minority Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, and Minority Leader McCarthy: The National Trust for Historic Preservation and the 379 undersigned preservation organizations and businesses thank you for your extraordinary efforts in acting to address so many of our nation’s needs in our current health and economic emergency. The enactment of the $2.2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and other response legislation provided essential funding and programs to begin our nation’s recovery. The CARES Act provided much needed funding for the nonprofit sector, including the arts and humanities, and we thank you for those provisions, including: • The Paycheck Protection Program and its forgivable loans to benefit small businesses and nonprofit organizations; • Providing a universal above-the-line deduction for taxpayers making charitable contributions; and • Creating additional funding for the National Endowment for the Arts ($75 million), National Endowment for the Humanities ($75 million), and the Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS) ($50 million). We are also extraordinarily thankful for last week’s Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act that will provide an additional $321 billion for the Paycheck Protection Program. This program is essential to ensuring economic vitality and meeting the The Watergate Office Building 2600 Virginia Avenue NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20037 E [email protected] P 202.588.6000 F 202.588.6038 SavingPlaces.org needs of nonprofit organizations and the small business community, especially Main Street businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Worcester County (PDF)
    Contents Worcester’s Original Locals ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Native American Names ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 From Colony To Free State ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 A Divided Land: Civil War .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Storm Surges & Modern Times ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Our Historic Towns .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Berlin ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Ocean City .................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Ocean Pines
    [Show full text]
  • Preservemaryland II
    PreserveMaryland II The Statewide Preservation Plan (2019-2023) 1 2 PreserveMaryland II: Key Authors and Contributors Nell Ziehl, Maryland Historical Trust Peter Kurtze, Maryland Historical Trust Ross Bater, Maryland Historical Trust Anne Raines, Maryland Historical Trust Jennifer Chadwick-Moore, Maryland Historical Trust With special thanks for content and images provided by Johns Hopkins at Baltimore Heritage, Inc.; Heidi Glatfelter Schlag, C&O Canal Trust; Judy Dobbs and Theresa Worden, Maryland Humanities; Karen Brown, Historic Annapolis Foundation; Cathy Thompson, Charles County Department of Planning and Zoning; Aaron Marcavitch, Maryland Milestones/Greater Anacostia Heritage Area; Elly Colmers Cowan, Preservation Maryland; Lady Brion, Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle With Special Thanks to Our Partners and Hosts AIA Baltimore * Archeological Society of Maryland, Inc. * Baltimore Museum of Industry * Coalition of Maryland Heritage Areas * Council for Maryland Archeology * Eastern Shore Network for Change * Galesville Community Association * Historic London Town and Gardens * Maryland Association of Historic District Commissions * Maryland Commission on African American History and Culture * Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs * Maryland Museums Association * Morgan State University * Preservation Maryland * Ward Museum of Wildfowl Art * Washington College * And to those who participated in the survey, forums, and interviews; advertised opportunities for participation; provided com- ments; and reviewed draft language and illustrations. Acknowledgement The production of the State Historic Preservation Plan has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE DR. DENISE D. MERINGOLO EDUCATION Ph.D. 2005 the George Washington University, American Studies M.A. 19
    CURRICULUM VITAE DR. DENISE D. MERINGOLO EDUCATION Ph.D. 2005 The George Washington University, American Studies M.A. 1994 University of Maryland, College Park, English B.A. 1990 The George Washington University, American Studies Experience in Higher Education 2012 University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Associate Professor, History 2006 University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Assistant Professor, History 2001 The George Washington University, Adjunct Instructor, American Studies 1994 University of Maryland, College Park, Teaching Assistant, English Experience in Other than Higher Education 2005 – 2006 The Accokeek Foundation at Piscataway Park, Accokeek, Maryland. Scholar-in-Residence 1997 – 2005 Public History Independent Consultant, Hired by Institutions Including Potomac River Heritage Trail, Harper’s Ferry, WVA Schomburg Center for the Study of Black Culture, NY Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington, DC Heritage Tourism Coalition, Washington, DC Historical Society of Washington, DC Oxford University Press, NY National Museum of American History, Washington, DC 1995 – 1997 Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington, DC, Curator 1991 – 1995 Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of American History, Project Researcher and Curatorial Assistant Research Support and/or Fellowships 2018 Whiting Foundation, Public Engagement Fellowship, Awarded Spring 2018 $50,000 to support Preserve the Baltimore Uprising 2015 Humanities Council of Maryland, Awarded Fall 2015, $3,070 to support NCPH Public Plenary, “The Uprising in Focus.” 2015 Dresher Center Residential Faculty Fellowship, Awarded May 2015 for Spring 2016 2015 Hrabowski Innovation Fund, Awarded $9,932.00 to support Explore Baltimore Heritage Partnership 2014 Entrepreneurship and Innovation Curriculum Grant, Alex Brown Center, Awarded $5000 for HIST 411 2014 "Doing Digital History," NEH Workshop, Office of Digital Humanities, Run by Roy Rosenzweig Center for History in New Media.
    [Show full text]
  • View National Trust for Historic Preservation Best Practices
    Cover Memo DATE: MAY 17, 2018 TO: PHILADELPHIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION TASK FORCE FROM: NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION RE: HISTORIC PRESERVATION & BUILDING REUSE: BEST PRACTICES RESEARCH Dear Task Force Members: As Technical Advisor to the Mayor Kenney’s Historic Preservation Task Force, the National Trust for Historic Preservation is providing the attached revised summaries of a select group of Best Practices as requested by the Task Force Sub-Committees. This in-depth research builds upon 2-3 months of preliminary research performed in the fall of 2017, presented to the Task Force in mid-January, and available on the Task Force website https://www.phlpreservation.org/. The National Trust undertook an additional 8-week research project to better understand and evaluate a refined list of Best Practices in four core areas – Survey, Outreach + Education, Incentives, and Regulation. Focused primarily, but not exclusively, on the Peer Cities identified earlier in the Task Force proceedings (Chicago, St. Louis, New York, Baltimore, Buffalo, and New Orleans), the National Trust’s Team conducted interviews with public agencies and local non-profits in each Peer City. Based on these interviews, extensive on-line research, and targeted outreach to preservation, public policy, and development professionals, as well as feedback from the Task Force subcommittees on initial drafts, the National Trust prepared the attached summaries of selected Best Practices. Included is an analysis identifying and articulating the benefits, challenges, applicability, funding, staffing requirements, and regulatory framework required for each of these Best Practices to succeed. Based on two rounds and nearly five months of intensive research by a team of eight multi-disciplinary professionals, the National Trust found that there is no “silver bullet” for historic preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Analysis A. the Industry
    PLAY Market Analysis A. The Industry Baltimore’s cultural, entertainment, and natural amenities are enjoyed by the residents in the Baltimore region as well as national and international tourists. In 2004, 11.79 million visitors from outside the Baltimore region explored the many attractions our City has to offer. In addition, 3.97 million visitors liv- ing in the Baltimore region, but outside Baltimore City, visited Baltimore. Of course, the 650,000 Baltimore City residents also enjoyed Baltimore’s numer- ous cultural, entertainment, and natural resource amenities. These amenities provide activities for all segments of the population, from youth and families to the elderly. The following discussion focuses on the market for Baltimore’s cultural, entertainment, and natural amenities, with emphasis on our customer base, market size, and trends. Heritage and Cultural Resources Baltimore’s heritage and cultural tourism industry provides place-based, unique experiential products that range from large, world-renowned attractions and events to small, locally celebrated attractions and events. The heritage and cultural tourism industry provides products within three broad areas: visual arts, including art museums, galleries, schools, studios, architecture and archi- tecture-related events; performing arts, including theater, art cinema, dance, and music; and historical and cultural resources, including history museums, literary events, bus and walking tours, and historic districts.1 These resources provide life-enriching experiences that are attracting a larger number of visitors who are generally over the age of 40. Heritage and Cultural tourism is expanding its products, especially in the African American niche market. In addition, visitation to historic and culturally rich neighborhoods is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes From
    News and Notes From The PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY JANUARY 1974 Vol. II, No. 1 VOLUME II With this, the January issue of News and Notes, we begin our second year of publication. When the first issue appeared last March we were uncertain as to whether a second one would see the light of day. However an enthusiastic response from our readers brought encouragement for further effort. Although the production of News and Notes has been largely a singular effort, your editor desires to take note of efforts put forth by individual members. Regular contributions by Paul Lanham and Ted Bissell have added greatly to the general scope of this publication. In addition, the general knowledge and contacts of Susanna Cristofane, Orva Heissenbuttel, John Brennan, James Shreve and James Wilfong have provided information on current happenings on the local scene. These and many others have, hopefully, made News and Notes more interesting for our readers. Also, we are indebted to our Corresponding Secretary, Edith Bagot. The added burden of circularizing the membership 12 times per year, instead of the usual eight times, has been cheerfully accepted. We are indeed thankful. In our effort to build a staff to produce News and Notes in the future, we have asked for volunteers. We are pleased to announce that Mrs. Leslie (Betty) Tichnor of District Heights will be contributing to the publication on a regular basis in the future. We hope that others will join us to help improve the quality and scope of our efforts. As always, we solicit the contributions and comments of all of our readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore, MD November 17 – 20, 2011
    The Society for American City and Regional Planning History Presents the s . a . c . r . p . h . Tremont Plaza Hotel Baltimore, MD November 17 – 20, 2011 baltimore 2011 Fourteenth National Conference on Planning History Preliminary Program Society for American City and Regional Planning History November 17-20, 2011 Baltimore, Maryland On behalf of the SACRPH Program Committee, our Local Arrangements Committee, and all those who have worked hard to get us ready for the biennial conference, we welcome you to Baltimore for the 14th National Conference on Planning History. This year marks the 25th anniversary of SACRPH’s founding, and we are delighted to see that the organization continues to grow and diversify. The 2009 conference boasted a record number of sessions—54 of them—but 2011 brought in unprecedented numbers of proposals, yielding a program that has now expanded to 74 paper sessions. For the first time, we have extended the regular portion of the program into Sunday. The conference has grown larger, but this is not because the Program Committee reduced standards. All paper and panel proposals were read and rated by at least 3 different members of the Committee, and we accepted only those with high rankings. Fortunately, paper quality seems to be keeping pace with the growth of the organization. Although have added many more sessions, we have not shortened them or crowded in more presenters. Instead, we have kept to SACRPH’s traditional emphasis on permitting time for discussion, by endeavoring to give 3-paper sessions 105 minutes, and 4-paper sessions a full two hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Judaica Provenance Research: Ceremonial Objects
    Looted Art and Jewish Cultural Property Initiative Salo Baron and members of the Synagogue Council of America depositing Torah scrolls in a grave at Beth El Cemetery, Paramus, New Jersey, 13 January 1952. Photograph by Fred Stein, collection of the American Jewish Historical Society, New York, USA. HANDBOOK ON JUDAICA PROVENANCE RESEARCH: CEREMONIAL OBJECTS By Julie-Marthe Cohen, Felicitas Heimann-Jelinek, and Ruth Jolanda Weinberger ©Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, 2018 Table of Contents Foreword, Wesley A. Fisher page 4 Disclaimer page 7 Preface page 8 PART 1 – Historical Overview 1.1 Pre-War Judaica and Jewish Museum Collections: An Overview page 12 1.2 Nazi Agencies Engaged in the Looting of Material Culture page 16 1.3 The Looting of Judaica: Museum Collections, Community Collections, page 28 and Private Collections - An Overview 1.4 The Dispersion of Jewish Ceremonial Objects in the West: Jewish Cultural Reconstruction page 43 1.5 The Dispersion of Jewish Ceremonial Objects in the East: The Soviet Trophy Brigades and Nationalizations in the East after World War II page 61 PART 2 – Judaica Objects 2.1 On the Definition of Judaica Objects page 77 2.2 Identification of Judaica Objects page 78 2.2.1 Inscriptions page 78 2.2.1.1 Names of Individuals page 78 2.2.1.2 Names of Communities and Towns page 79 2.2.1.3 Dates page 80 2.2.1.4 Crests page 80 2.2.2 Sizes page 81 2.2.3 Materials page 81 2.2.3.1 Textiles page 81 2.2.3.2 Metal page 82 2.2.3.3 Wood page 83 2.2.3.4 Paper page 83 2.2.3.5 Other page 83 2.2.4 Styles
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Files
    VERTICAL FILE FINDING AID File Category & Sub-categories Drawer VF 1: AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY N8 A VF 1.1 Assorted N8 A VF 1.2 Delaware N8 A VF 1.3 Education VF 1.4 History N8 A VF 1.4.1 Black History Month N8 A VF 1.4.2 Colonial History N8 A VF 1.4.3 Integration / Segregation N8 A VF 1.4.4 Ku Klux Klan N8 A VF 1.4.5 Landmarks N8 A VF 1.4.6 Liberia N8 A VF 1.4.7 Lynchings N8 A VF 1.4.8 Military N8 A VF1.4.9 Slavery N8 A VF 1.4.10 Underground Railroad VF 1.5 Maryland Counties N8 A VF 1.5.1 Caroline N8 A VF 1.5.2 Dorchester N8 A VF 1.5.3 Kent N8 A VF 1.5.4 Prince George’s N8 A VF 1.5.5 Queen Anne’s N8 A VF 1.5.6 Somerset N8 A VF 1.5.7 Talbot N8 A VF 1.5.8 Wicomico N8 A VF 1.5.9 Worcester N8 A VF 1.6 Occupations N8 A VF 1.7 People VF 1.8 Race Relations / Riots N8 A VF 1.8.1 Assorted N8 A VF 1.8.2 Cambridge Riots N8 A VF 1.8.3 Princess Anne N8 A VF 1.8.4 Salisbury 1968 N8 A VF 2: ARCHAEOLOGY VF 3: ARCHITECTURE N8 A VF 3.1 Historic N8 A VF 3.2 Modern VF 4: BUSINESS & INDUSTRY N8 A VF 4.1 Agriculture N8 A VF 4.2 Assorted N8 A VF 4.3 Canning N8 A VF 4.4 Eastern Shore Business 1 VERTICAL FILE FINDING AID File Category & Sub-categories Drawer VF 4.5 Mills & Milling N8 A VF 4.5.1 Assorted N8 A VF 4.5.2 Barren Creek Mill N8 A VF 4.5.3 Double Mills N8 A VF 4.5.4 Linchester Mills N8 A VF 4.5.5 Windmills N8 A VF 4.6 Occupations VF 4.7 Poultry N8 B VF 4.7.1 Assorted N8 B VF 4.7.2 Delmarva Chicken Festival N8 B VF 4.7.3 Perdue VF 4.8 Railroads N8 B VF 4.8.1 Delmarva Railroads N8 B VF 4.8.2 Maryland Railroads N8 B VF 4.8.3 Talbot Cty Railroads N8 B VF
    [Show full text]