WHITE ROSE CCS FACILITY, DRAX, NORTH YORKSHIRE Report On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHITE ROSE CCS FACILITY, DRAX, NORTH YORKSHIRE Report On DRX011 - 006 WHITE ROSE CCS FACILITY, DRAX, NORTH YORKSHIRE Report on Archaeological Evaluation Draft v2 Client: ERM on behalf of Capture Power Ltd DRX011 – 006 summary sheet Client: ERM on behalf of Capture Power Ltd National Grid Reference: SE 665 280 (site centre) Address: Drax Power Station, Selby, North Yorkshire Parishes: Long Drax Council North Yorkshire OASIS No headland1-216521 Project Manager Alistair Robertson Text Magnar Dalland, Emma Tetlow, Julie Franklin, Laura Bailey, Tim Holden Illustrations Rafael Maya-Torcelly, Julia Bastek-Michalska & Caroline Norrman Fieldwork Emma Tetlow, Magnar Dalland, Phil Karsgaard Schedule: Fieldwork June 2015 Report July 2015 Summary Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd was commissioned by ERM, on behalf of Capture Power Ltd, to undertake an archaeological trial trench evaluation in connection with the proposed White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage (WRCCS) Facility on land adjacent to Drax Power Station, North Yorkshire (NGR: site centre SE 665 280). A total of 27 trenches were excavated to characterise the archaeological and palaeoenvironmental potential of the site. The most significant result was the discovery of an extensive area of probable Roman activity in the S half of field H, where ditch remains and associated pottery were recovered. In addition, the work further supported the likelihood of a medieval fish pond and moat associated with Drax Priory in Field J. Auger survey revealed a substantial deposit of organic-rich material and peat preserved within the confines of the former channel of the Carr Dike. This material has the potential to produce a significant palaeoenvironmental data-set to further enhance an understanding of the human and environmental activities across the site. Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 5 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................................ 7 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT .............................................. 11 FINDS ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................................... 15 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................... 16 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendices Appendix 1: Site Registers Appendix 1.1: Trench Register Appendix 1.2: Context Register Appendix 1.3: Drawing Register Appendix 1.4: Photographic Register Appendix 1.5: Finds Register Appendix 1.6: Samples Register Appendix 2: Environmental Data Appendix 2.1: Auger Register Appendix 2.2: Retent & Flot tables Appendix 3: Finds Data INTRODUCTION Project background ERM, on behalf of Capture Power Ltd, commissioned Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd to undertake an archaeological trial trench evaluation in connection with the proposed White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage (WRCCS) Facility on land adjacent to Drax Power Station, North Yorkshire (NGR: site centre SE 665 280). Drax Power Station is located on the floodplain, c.1.3 km from the S side of the River Ouse, and some 500 m S of the scheduled remains of Drax Augustinian Priory. The WRCCS Facility will be built on farmland between the existing Drax Power Station and the scheduled area. The project has been divided into two stages: A) an initial ‘site raising’ to enable the construction of an earthworks platform for the new facility to the N of the current power station; and B) the main construction phase The proposed boundaries and programmes of these two phases of work are different, and the archaeological evaluation and mitigation strategy was designed to cover both phases of work. The evaluation was carried out in accordance with a Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) prepared by Headland Archaeology based on a Project Design prepared by Charles Le Quesne at ERM. The fieldwork took place from the 8 th to the 23 rd June 2015. Geology, topography and current land use The combined application areas (Illus 1) occupy a low-lying situation in the floodplain of the River Ouse, below 6m AOD. The underlying geology, as mapped by the British Geological Survey, comprises late Pleistocene clay deposits that are referred to as the ‘25 Foot Drift’. There are slight but significant variations in topography within the predominantly flat landscape. In particular, the remains of the scheduled Drax Priory occupy a slight rise immediately to the N of the area up to 7m aOD; and there is a pronounced dip (1.6 – 1.7m minimum aOD) immediately to the SE of the Carr Dike, an artificial drainage channel. The combined application areas have been divided into fields which have been labelled F-J on Illus 1 (following on from fields labelled during previous fieldwork). Field F is located immediately to the S of the scheduled area of Drax Priory. It is an arable field with a waist high crop of barley at the time of the evaluation. Field G is located between field F and New Road along the E side of the power station. A public footpath cuts across the field which comprises rough grassland. Fields H and I are arable fields with a waist high crop of barley located to the E of New Road and to the S of Pear Tree Avenue. Field J is also planted with barley. It is located on the W side of the scheduled area of Drax Priory. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND Previous work Previous work by Northern Archaeological Associates (NAA) (1998) was carried out on behalf of National Power plc, to inform proposals for development in the vicinity. The NAA project was focused on the priory, with the aim of defining its extent and the character of the surviving remains. The work comprised analysis of historic maps and aerial photographs, topographic and earthwork survey, geophysical survey (gradiometer survey, with resistivity survey covering a smaller area), field walking of ploughed fields adjacent to the Scheduled Area, and excavation of two small trial trenches. NAA later produced a desk-based assessment (2006) which synthesised the results of the earlier fieldwork and added further detail from historical sources. The desk-based assessment prepared by Headland Archaeology (Breslin et al 2009) drew on both these earlier reports, with the addition of a palaeoenvironmental assessment. Several phases of field work were carried out by Headland in 2009 comprising geophysical survey (Harrison 2009), field-walking (Dalland & Franklin 2009) and trial-trench evaluations (Masser 2009a; Masser 2009b; Masser & Lancaster 2009). This work took place in Fields A to E to the E of the area for the current evaluation. A third geophysical survey was undertaken in 2012/13 covering the NE half of field F as well as Fields G, H, I and J. Roman activity Field walking carried out by NAA between the scheduled area and the lagoon to the NW retrieved 19 sherds of Roman pottery (NAA 1998, Figs 14 and 15), with a notable concentration roughly in the centre of the Field J. A trial trench was excavated by NAA in the vicinity of this concentration (NAA 1998, Fig 2), across a recently removed field boundary that is still visible as a slight hollow in the surface of the field (Illus 2). Eight sherds of Roman pottery were recovered from the ditch associated with this field boundary. The sequence of cuts and deposits within the ditch are ambiguous and it is not clear which can be assigned to the Roman period. In addition to the concentration in Field J, a single Roman sherd was retrieved from the N edge of field F. The three phases of trial trenching carried out previously by Headland found no evidence for the Roman activity identified by the NAA study, and no diagnostic finds of Roman date were found in the field walking covering Fields C and D carried out in 2009 (Dalland and Franklin 2009). Therefore, prior to the current fieldwork, the main evidence of Roman activity was focussed in Field J. Medieval and post-medieval activity The extent of features associated with the priory still remains unknown. While it is recognised that the activities of the priory would have extended out into the surrounding landscape, the boundary of the priory precincts were presumably clearly defined. Nineteenth century descriptions refer to a moat around the site which is shown on the 1907 Ordnance Survey map (NAA 1998, Figure 5). If the moat relates to the priory rather than the post-dissolution Drax Abbey Farm, and formed the boundary of its precincts, the remains of the priory are probably largely limited to the scheduled area. Field walking carried out by NAA (1998, 15-16, Figs 14 and 15) and Headland (Dalland and Franklin 2009) is also relevant to the question
Recommended publications
  • K45: Full Chain Public and Stakeholder Engagement Commercial; Project Management
    January 2016 K45: Full chain public and stakeholder engagement Commercial; Project Management K45: Full chain public and stakeholder engagement IMPORTANT NOTICE The information provided further to UK CCS Commercialisation Programme (the Competition) set out herein (the Information) has been prepared by Capture Power Limited and its sub-contractors (the Consortium) solely for the Department of Energy and Climate Change in connection with the Competition. The Information does not amount to advice on CCS technology or any CCS engineering, commercial, financial, regulatory, legal or other solutions on which any reliance should be placed. Accordingly, no member of the Consortium makes (and the UK Government does not make) any representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of the Information and no reliance may be placed on the Information. In so far as permitted by law, no member of the Consortium or any company in the same group as any member of the Consortium or their respective officers, employees or agents accepts (and the UK Government does not accept) any responsibility or liability of any kind, whether for negligence or any other reason, for any damage or loss arising from any use of or any reliance placed on the Information or any subsequent communication of the Information. Each person to whom the Information is made available must make their own independent assessment of the Information after making such investigation and taking professional technical, engineering, commercial, regulatory, financial, legal or other advice, as they deem necessary. The contents of this report draw on work partly funded under the European Union’s European Energy Programme for Recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulation Assessment Scoping Report
    Hambleton District Council Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report January 2016 Summary The Habitats Directive1 seeks to protect the integrity of Natura 2000 sites and requires a Habitats Regulations Assessment to be undertaken to assess the implications of the plan or project on Natura 2000 sites, which includes Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA) and RAMSAR sites. The key principle is to adopt the precautionary approach and to preserve the integrity of sites. The sites identified for inclusion in the assessment are: SAC North York Moors Strensall Common River Derwent North Pennine Moors North Pennine Dales Meadows SPA North York Moors North Pennine Moors Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast Ramsar Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast The Hambleton Local Plan will allocate land for housing and commercial development to meet the growth of the District up to 2035. Introduction 1 The Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) (Directive 92/34/EEC) Requirement to carry out an assessment under the Habitats Regulations Articles 6 (3) and 6 (4) of the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) (Directive 92/43/EEC) require an assessment to be undertaken for plans and projects that are likely to have a significant effect, alone or in combination with other plans and projects, on one or more European sites (Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation). Article 6(3) states: ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans and projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accountability Meeting
    Public Accountability Meeting Public Questions – Local Priorities (27 February 2018) Questions asked by the public about policing matters in their local area have been answered by Julia Mulligan, your elected Police and Crime Commissioner. Questions and answers are grouped by area as per the meeting. We have grouped similar issues within those sections so that you can see what others are asking and how we have responded to them, and then alphabetically by surname. County Command (Harrogate, Craven, Richmondshire and Hambleton) Concern: Low level crime and anti-social behaviour Question from Richard Christian, BluSkills Ltd “Do you feel that the community’s concerns regarding anti-social behaviour are as a result of a draw down in Police and PCSO presence on the street, with Police moving to vehicle bourne reactive tactics instead of community policing and foot/bike patrols? Do you see this as an issue and are you looking to address it? “I see many early teen aged groups loitering in kids play areas and on the streets. Most of these areas are poorly lit and offer cover for smoking of recreational drugs and alcohol. How are you working with local authorities as part of a prevent strategy to create dedicated spaces and activities for the younger generations to enjoy positively rather than turning to anti-social behaviour and is there a desire to light areas which currently offer a safe haven for drug taking.” Answer: A central part of my role as Commissioner is to be the voice of the public, and I have made it clear through the ‘Reinforcing Local Policing’ priority in the Police and Crime Plan that local policing remains important to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAX REPOWER PROJECT Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-Technical Summary
    Drax DRAX REPOWER PROJECT Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-Technical Summary 70037047_PEIR_NTS JANUARY 2018 PUBLIC Drax DRAX REPOWER PROJECT Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-Technical Summary TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70037047 OUR REF. NO. 70037047_PEIR_NTS DATE: JANUARY 2018 WSP Three White Rose Office Park Millshaw Park Lane Leeds LS11 0DL Phone: +44 113 395 6200 Fax: +44 113 395 6201 WSP.com QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Remarks Date January 2018 Prepared by Various Signature Checked by Various Signature Authorised by Chris Taylor Signature Project number 70037047 Report number File reference DRAX REPOWER PROJECT WSP Project No.: 70037047 | Our Ref No.: 70037047_PEIR_NTS January 2018 Drax CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 EIA METHODOLOGY 4 3 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6 4 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES 16 5 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT 17 6 AIR QUALITY 19 7 NOISE AND VIBRATION 21 8 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT 23 9 BIODIVERSITY 25 10 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL 27 11 GROUND CONDITIONS AND CONTAMINATION 29 12 WATER RESOURCE, QUALITY AND HYDROLOGY 31 13 WASTE 33 14 SOCIO-ECONOMICS 34 15 CUMULATIVE AND COMBINED EFFECTS 36 16 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 39 17 REFERENCES 41 DRAX REPOWER PROJECT WSP Project No.: 70037047 | Our Ref No.: 70037047_PEIR_NTS January 2018 Drax Table 1 – Abbreviations Abbreviation Term in full AILs Abnormal Indivisible Loads CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CHP Combined Heat and Power DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement GIS Gas Insulated Switchgear HGVs Heavy Goods Vehicles HRSG Heat Recovery Steam Generator MW Megawatts NOx Nitrogen oxides NTS Non-Technical Summary OCGT Open Cycle Gas Turbine PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Table 2 - Glossary Term Definition Combined Cycle Gas Turbine A combined cycle gas turbine is an assembly of turbines that convert heat (CCGT) into mechanical energy and works alongside HRSGs.
    [Show full text]
  • Socc) the Planning Act 2008 (Section 47)
    Drax Power Limited Drax Power Station Repower Statement of Community Consultation (SoCC) The Planning Act 2008 (Section 47) www.wsp.com CONTENTS Drax Power Limited ......................................................................................................................... 1 Drax Power Station Repower ......................................................................................................... 1 Statement of Community Consultation (SoCC) ............................................................................ 1 The Planning Act 2008 (Section 47) .............................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. The Project ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Proposed project Development boundary .............................................................................................. 7 1.4. Purpose of the Statement of Community Consultation (SoCC) ............................................................ 7 2. The National Infrastructure Planning process ................................................................... 8 2.1. The Application ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Make the Most of Selby Park
    Summer 2012 Make the most of Selby Park Now is the ideal time to visit Selby’s biggest and most popular park – Selby Park in the heart of the town. It’s easy to forget that a day at areas for the kids, crazy golf and The Park also has an Annual Park the park can keep the whole bowling are just the start of it. As Open Day every July – a fantastic family entertained without well as offering ice creams, tea, free day out for all the family. costing you a fortune. coffee and snacks, the Pavilion Selby Park is maintained by The busy park, near Selby Abbey also hosts bingo sessions. WLCT as part of a deal with covers five acres and offers Don’t forget that over the Selby District Council to deliver something for everyone. Play summer months, the play area leisure services. adjacent to the pavilion offers toys suitable for younger children and a bouncy castle. Make sure you keep an eye out INSIDE for posters advertising regular Find out about: music concerts by local and regional bands. The latest work of your Community Officers Welcome to the summer issue of The Police your Open Door newsletter. Operation Tornado This newsletter gives you a chance to get local information, the latest news on our services and gives Recent changes you all the important contact details you might need, to the benefits all in one place. system Don’t forget, if you would like to receive future issues of Open Door by email, rather High speed than through the post, please let us know.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    MELANIE HALL Department of History of Art and Architecture, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Ave, Boston MA 02215 Tel: 617 353 2520 Fax: 617 353 3242 E-mail: [email protected] Education and Qualifications: B.A. 1980. University of Leeds. History of Fine and Decorative Arts. Ph.D. 2016. Leeds Beckett University. Cultural History. Dissertation: “Devising the National Trust: From an Idea to an Institution in a Transatlantic Context, circa 1810-1907.” Examiner: Professor Peter Mandler, P.R.Hist.S., Gonville and Caius College, University of Cambridge. Honors: Elected Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London (FSA), 2006-present. Research Associate, Centre for Conservation Studies, Department of Archaeology, University of York. 2017-present. Employment: January 1999-present Associate Professor and Director of Museum Studies, Department of the History of Art and Architecture, Boston University. Affiliations: American and New England Studies; Preservation Studies Teaching. Courses in: History and current practice of museums and historical agencies Curatorship. Digital Curation (Romantic, transatlantic networks in conservation: paintings and literature). English Country House, and influences on American Domestic Architecture C17-C20. American Furniture, C17–C20 Learning to See Historic House Museums: heritage and preservation Architecture and Society: World Heritage and its 19thC. origins English Vernacular Buildings, medieval-1800 Writing Program: Architecture and a Sense of Place Supervision: Directed studies Work for distinction MA thesis
    [Show full text]
  • White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Project
    White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Project Land adjacent to and within the Drax Power Station site, Drax, near Selby, North Yorkshire Environmental Permit Chapter X - Noise and Vibration Applicant: Drax Power Limited Date: April 2015 Document History Document Number 1 Revision 0.1 Author Jim Doyle Signed Jim Doyle Date Approved By Signed Date Document Owner Drax Power Plc Revision History Revision No. Date Reason for Revision Authorised By Environment Permit EPR/VP3530LS/V012 Page ii Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions AOD Above Ordinance Datum ASU Air Separation Unit BS British Standard CCS Carbon Capture and Storage CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CPL Capture Power Limited dB Decibel EA Environment Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement FGD Flue Gas Desulphurisation FRA Flood Risk Assessment GPU Gas Processing Unit HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle LWS Local Wildlife Site MWe Megawatt NERC Natural Environment and Rural Communities (Act 2006) NSIP Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SAC Special Area of Conservation SINC Site of Importance for Nature Conservation SPA Special Protection Area SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest WFD Water Framework Directive WHO World Health Organisation WSI Written Scheme of Investigation Environment Permit EPR/VP3530LS/V012 Page iii CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Drax Power Limited Drax Repower Project
    The Drax Power (Generating Stations) Order Land at, and in the vicinity of, Drax Power Station, near Selby, North Yorkshire Environmental Statement Appendix 1.2 - Scoping Opinion The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 – Regulation 5(2)(a) Drax Power Limited Drax Repower Project Applicant: DRAX POWER LIMITED Date: May 2018 Document Ref: 6.2.1.2 PINS Ref: EN010091 SCOPING OPINION Proposed Drax Repower Project October 2017 The Planning Inspectorate [This page has been intentionally left blank] Scoping Opinion for Drax RePower Project CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 5 1.1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................5 1.2 THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE’S CONSULTATION ................................7 1.3 ARTICLE 50 OF THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION ...............................7 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................. 8 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................8 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................8 2.3 THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE’S COMMENTS ......................................9 3. EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ........................................... 12 3.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 12 3.2 RELEVANT NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENTS (NPSS) ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Project
    White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Project Land adjacent to and within the Drax Power Station site, Drax, near Selby, North Yorkshire Environmental Permit Chapter I – Introduction Applicant: Drax Power Limited Date: April 2015 Document History Document Number 1 Revision 0.4 Author Jim Doyle and Luke Jenkins Signed Date Approved By Signed Date Document Owner Drax Power Plc Revision History Revision No. Date Reason for Revision Authorised By 0.1 05.12.14 First Draft – Report Format 0.2 08.12.14 Second Draft – Inclusion of NTS and Interface Chapters 0.3 22.12.14 Separation of Chapters 0.4 31.03.15 Final Version Environment Permit EPR/VP3530LS/VO12 Page ii Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions AOD Above Ordinance Datum ASU Air Separation Unit BS British Standard CCS Carbon Capture and Storage CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CPL Capture Power Limited dB Decibel EA Environment Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMS Environmental Management System EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction ES Environmental Statement FGD Flue Gas Desulphurisation FRA Flood Risk Assessment GPU Gas Processing Unit HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle LWS Local Wildlife Site MWe Megawatt NERC Natural Environment and Rural Communities (Act 2006) NSIP Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project NYCC North Yorkshire County Council PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SAC Special Area of Conservation SINC Site of Importance for Nature Conservation SPA Special Protection Area SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest WHO World Health Organisation WSI Written Scheme of Investigation Environment Permit EPR/VP3530LS/VO12 Page iii CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................. 5 3.0 THE PROJECT’S ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC SETTING ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan
    Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan Adoption Version 22 October 2013 Copies of the accompanying evidence base including the Sustainability Appraisal Report and Background Papers can also be viewed on our website You may get further help from the Policy Team at: Selby District Council, Doncaster Road, Selby YO8 9FT [email protected] 01757 292034 01757 292229 If you require any further help or advice or if you need this document in a different format, for example large print, audio, Braille or in another language, please contact the Policy Team on (01757) 292034 or email [email protected] The Status of Regional Strategy (RS) and the Implications of the Localism Act 2011 At the time of ‘Publication’ of the Submission Draft Core Strategy (SDCS), the Development Plan for Selby District comprised the Regional Spatial Strategy (the Yorkshire and Humber Plan or RS), and ‘Saved’ Local Plan policies, namely Selby District Local Plan, North Yorkshire Minerals Local Plan and North Yorkshire Waste Local Plan. The Core Strategy is the first development plan document prepared by the Council as part of its new Local Development Framework (Local Plan). On adoption it replaces a number of the ‘Saved’ Selby District Local Plan policies1. On 6 July 2010 the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced the revocation of RS with immediate effect. As a result of the Secretary of State’s revocation decision, the Council reviewed the Core Strategy and the evidence base on which it is founded, and came to the conclusion that while the policies and context provided by RS were no longer applicable, the RS evidence base remains robust and relevant, particularly since the RS evidence had been subject to a process of consultation and Examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Rusholme Wind Farm
    Rusholme Wind Farm ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT May 2004 VOLUME 2: THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT TEXT W I N D P R O S P E C T D E V E L O P M E N T S L T D 7 , B E R K E L E Y S Q U A R E C L I F T O N B R I S T O L B S 8 1 H G TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT................................................................ 5 1.3 CONSULTATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 THE CONSULTANCY TEAM..................................................................................................... 5 1.5 FORM AND CONTENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT........................................ 8 2 THE PROPOSED RUSHOLME WIND FARM ....................................................... 9 2.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 LOCATION ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 TURBINES.................................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 SITE ACCESS ............................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]