BP 2020-2.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE BRITISH ARMY in the LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 By
‘FAIRLY OUT-GENERALLED AND DISGRACEFULLY BEATEN’: THE BRITISH ARMY IN THE LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 by ANDREW ROBERT LIMM A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. University of Birmingham School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law October, 2014. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The history of the British Army in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars is generally associated with stories of British military victory and the campaigns of the Duke of Wellington. An intrinsic aspect of the historiography is the argument that, following British defeat in the Low Countries in 1795, the Army was transformed by the military reforms of His Royal Highness, Frederick Duke of York. This thesis provides a critical appraisal of the reform process with reference to the organisation, structure, ethos and learning capabilities of the British Army and evaluates the impact of the reforms upon British military performance in the Low Countries, in the period 1793 to 1814, via a series of narrative reconstructions. This thesis directly challenges the transformation argument and provides a re-evaluation of British military competency in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. -
Jane Porter Papers, 1820-1859
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt558005wj No online items Finding Aid for the Jane Porter Papers, 1820-1859 Processed by Esther Vécsey; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Manuscripts Division Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2002 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid for the Jane Porter 715 1 Papers, 1820-1859 Finding Aid for the Jane Porter Papers, 1820-1859 Collection number: 715 UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Manuscripts Division Los Angeles, CA Contact Information Manuscripts Division UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Telephone: 310/825-4988 (10:00 a.m. - 4:45 p.m., Pacific Time) Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ Processed by: Esther Vécsey, 4 May 1961 Encoded by: Caroline Cubé Text converted and initial container list EAD tagging by: Apex Data Services Online finding aid edited by: Josh Fiala, April 2002 © 2002 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Jane Porter Papers, Date (inclusive): 1820-1859 Collection number: 715 Creator: Porter, Jane, 1776-1850 Extent: 1 box (0.5 linear ft.) Repository: University of California, Los Angeles. Library. Department of Special Collections. Los Angeles, California 90095-1575 Abstract: Jane Porter (1776-1850) wrote two historical romances, Thaddeus of Warsaw (1803) and The Scottish Chiefs (1810) as well as plays and novels. -
Eugene Miakinkov
Russian Military Culture during the Reigns of Catherine II and Paul I, 1762-1801 by Eugene Miakinkov A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta ©Eugene Miakinkov, 2015 Abstract This study explores the shape and development of military culture during the reign of Catherine II. Next to the institutions of the autocracy and the Orthodox Church, the military occupied the most important position in imperial Russia, especially in the eighteenth century. Rather than analyzing the military as an institution or a fighting force, this dissertation uses the tools of cultural history to explore its attitudes, values, aspirations, tensions, and beliefs. Patronage and education served to introduce a generation of young nobles to the world of the military culture, and expose it to its values of respect, hierarchy, subordination, but also the importance of professional knowledge. Merit is a crucial component in any military, and Catherine’s military culture had to resolve the tensions between the idea of meritocracy and seniority. All of the above ideas and dilemmas were expressed in a number of military texts that began to appear during Catherine’s reign. It was during that time that the military culture acquired the cultural, political, and intellectual space to develop – a space I label the “military public sphere”. This development was most clearly evident in the publication, by Russian authors, of a range of military literature for the first time in this era. The military culture was also reflected in the symbolic means used by the senior commanders to convey and reinforce its values in the army. -
Polish) Lesson Plan (English) the Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (Revision Class)
The Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (revision class) The Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (revision class) Lesson Plan (Polish) Lesson Plan (English) The Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (revision class) 3rd May 1791 Constuon Source: Jan Matejko, Konstytucja 3 Maja 1791 roku, 1891, oil on canvas, domena publiczna. Link to the Lesson You will learn to describe the most important historical events of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; to list the crises that struck Poland in the eighteenth century and what attempts at reform were undertaken; to explain the historical significance of the collapse of the Polish‐Lithuanian Commonwealth. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu By the eighteenth century, the Polish‐Lithuanian political system became anachronistic. The state was becoming ever weaker. It did not pursue an active foreign policy; it was more of an object than a subject on the international stage. Due to the presence of the liberum veto, the nobility obstructed attempts at reform with ease. One deputy’s vote against a project was enough to dismiss the entire Sejm. The representatives of the nobility oftentimes accepted bribes from foreign powers that wished to keep Poland‐Lithuania weak. Russia had ever more say in the affairs of the country. When Stanisław II Augustus was elected King, some of the patriotically inclined nobles rebelled against his rule and created the Bar Confederation The part of the military that remained loyal to the King suppressed the rebellion with the aid of Russian forces. Capitalizing upon the opportunity, Russia, Austria, and Prussia conducted the First Partition of Poland in 1772. -
Porter Family Collection -- Phillipps # Order
Porter Family Collection -- Phillipps # order Document Phillipps Place sent Box Folde Item Type Sender / Author # from Recipient Place sent to Date Extent Note 24 45 00000 1 Letter William [Great Busby Porter, Robert Ker [after 1810] 1 leaf (2 Red wax seal in pieces Britain, King (William House pages) IV)?] 21 59 00000 2 Letter Fox-Strangways, [Dorsetsh Porter, Robert Ker 1836 1 leaf (2 William ire] January 1 pages) 24 37 00000 3 Letter Vaughan, [Sir] Porter, Robert Ker Gadsby's Hotel 1829 May 1 leaf (1 Cha[rle]s R[ichard] [Virginia?] 28 page) 24 11 00000 4 Letter Taylor, Herbert Horse Porter, Robert Ker Caracas 1826 3 leaves Includes envelope; red wax seal Guards August 5 (9 pages) 30 24 00000 5 Letter Doyle, J[ames] 18 1827 June 1 leaf (2 W[arren] [?] Welbeck 26 pages) Street 24 43 00000 6 Letter Wheatley, Henry St. Porter, Robert Ker 1838 May 1 leaf (3 James's 25 pages) Palace 24 27 00000 7 Letter Throckmorton, Coughton Porter, Robert Ker 1836 1 leaf (2 Red wax seal Charles Court September pages) 29 24 42 00000 8 Letter Wharton, T. J. Philadelp Porter, Robert Ker 1829 June 9 1 leaf (2 hia pages) 21 81 00000 9 Letter "I do not sign." Cartagen Porter, Robert Ker 1831 2 leaves a March 21 (8 pages) 24 50 00000 10 Letter Wilson, Robert, Sir Regent Porter, Robert Ker 1829 July 28 1 leaf (2 S[treet?] pages) 21 21 00000 11 Letter [Denham, John Porter, Robert Ker 1828 May 6 2 leaves Charles (Denham, (4 pages) Colonel)] 24 16 00000 12 Letter Taylor, Herbert Windsor Porter, Robert Ker 1837 May 1 leaf (2 Castle 29 pages) 21 44 00000 13 Letter Downes, Henry Carlton Porter, Robert Ker Caracas 1831 April 5 1 leaf (4 Includes copies of other letters; red Chamber pages) wax seal s Thursday, July 05, 2012 Porter Family Collection -- Phillipps # order Page 1 of 244 Document Phillipps Place sent Box Folde Item Type Sender / Author # from Recipient Place sent to Date Extent Note 22 8 00000 14 Letter Lad, H. -
16Th-19Th Century)
Jacek Kulbaka DOi: 10.14746/bhw.2018.38.2 Maria Grzegorzewska University From the history of disabilities (16th-19th century) Abstract: The article presents various circumstances (social, legal, philosophical and scientific) connected with the care, upbringing and education of people with disabilities from the early modern era to the beginning of the 20th century. Particular attention was to the history of people with disa- bilities in the Polish lands. The author tried to recall the activity of leading educational activists, ped- agogues and scientists – animators of special education in Poland, Europe and the world. The text also contains information related to the activities of educational and upbringing institutions (institu- tional, organisational, methodological and other aspects). Keywords: Disability, history of disability, blind, mentally handicapped, morally neglected, deaf, education, care, education of people with disabilities The negative perception of disabilities over the centuries has led to the social exclu- sion of thousands of people: deaf, blind, mentally disabled, those with chronic illnesses and otherwise disabled – to follow in the footsteps of typology that was still widespread mid-20th century. We can find confirmation of this state of things in written and non-writ- ten sources, as well as in contemporary Polish studies from the border of pedagogy and psychology of ethnography, cultural studies, archaeology and others1. 1 Cf. SAHAJ, T., “Problem niepełnosprawności w starożytnej kulturze greckiej: rozważania filozoficzno- społeczne”, [in:] Roczniki Naukowe AWF w Poznaniu, bk. 52, 2003, p. 127–141.; NASIEROWSKI, T., HER- czyńska, G., MYSZKA, D.M., Zagłada chorych psychicznie: pamięć i historia, Warsaw 2012 /Martyrdom of the mentally disabled in 1939–1945/; KRAUZE, a., “Niepełnosprawność: inny w paradygmacie humanistyc- znym”, [in:] Niepełnosprawność, no. -
Training to Fight – Russia's Major Military Exercises 2011–2014
“Train hard, fi ght easy.” The Russian 18th century General Aleksandr Norberg Johan toFight Training Vasilievich Suvorov (see cover) is said to never have lost a battle. The main idea of his dictum is clear. Armed forces train to fi ght. The more they train, the better they get. Exercises are primarily a way to develop capabilities in units, build the fi ghting power of a force and, ultimately, the military power of the state. How did military exercises contribute to the fi ghting power of Russia’s Armed Forces in 2011 – 2014? Based on reporting in Russian open sources, the main conclusion in this report is that the Russian Armed Forces exercises enabled them to train how to launch and fi ght large-scale joint inter-service operations, i.e. launching and waging inter-state wars Training to Fight – Russia’s Major Military Exercises 2011–2014 Johan Norberg FOI-R--4128--SE ISSN1650-1942 www.foi.se December 2015 Johan Norberg Training to Fight – Russia’s Major Military Exercises 2011–2014 Press Bild/Cover: TT/The Art Collector/Heritage. Alexander Suvorov, Russian general, (1833). In a military career lasting almost 60 years, Suvorov (1729-1800) never lost a battle. In 1799-1800, during the War of the Second Coalition against France, he led a Russian army on an epic retreat across the Alps reminiscent of Hannibal. Found in the collection of The Hermitage, St Petersburg. FOI-R--4128--SE Titel Training to Fight Title Training to Fight Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--4128--SE Månad/Month December Utgivningsår/Year 2015 Antal sidor/Pages 100 ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsdepartementet / Swedish Ministry of Defence Forskningsområde 8. -
Exits on the Road to Serfdom
Putting Speed Bumps on the Road to Serfdom James R. Thompson Department of Statistics Rice University February 2017 Dealing with Postmodernism Events do not happen; events are produced.An occurrence becomes an event only when certain groups in society pay attention to it, consider it important, speak and write about it, react to it, and remember it. Thus events are socially constructed. Carola Dietze German Historical Institute Bulletin, no. 40. Few have influenced postmodern modalities of thinking more than the late French philosopher and anthropologist Michel Foucault. Foucault raised serious questions about the validity of time line arguments and about other characteristics of Western thought. Going back to another venerable and much admired civilization, that of China, he wrote extensively about a Chinese encyclopedia in which animals are divided into the following categories: 1. belonging to the Emperor, 2. embalmed, 3. tame, 4. suckling pigs, 5. sirens, 6. fabulous, 7. stray dogs, Michel Foucault 8. included in the present classification, 1926-1984 9. frenzied, 10. innumerable, 11. drawn with a very fine camelhair brush, 12. et cetera, 13. having just broken the water pitcher, 14. that from a long way off look like flies. J. A. Ratzinger From his Regensburg Lecture Modifying the first verse of the Book of Genesis, the first verse of the whole Bible, John began the prologue of his Gospel with the words: "In the beginning was the “Logos". Logos means both reason and word - a reason which is creative and capable of self-communication, precisely as reason. John thus spoke the final word on the biblical concept of God, and in this word all the often toilsome and tortuous threads of biblical faith find their culmination and synthesis. -
Dominik Flisiak PARTICIPATION of JEWS in the KOŚCIUSZKO
STUDIA HUMANISTYCZNO-SPOŁECZNE (HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES) 14 Edited by Radosław Kubicki and Wojciech Saletra 2016 Dominik Flisiak Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Poland PARTICIPATION OF JEWS IN THE KOŚCIUSZKO UPRISING. THE MEMORY OF POLISH AND JEWISH BROTHERHOOD OF ARMS At the end of the second half of the 18th century, about 750–800 thousand Jews lived in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.1 That constituted approximately 6% of the overall population. A significant number of Orthodox Jews lived in quahals, Jewish Communities. About 66% of them lived in towns, the rest lived in villages.2 A major part of that society worked as traders, innkeepers, or craftsmen. Only a small percentage worked as farmers.3 The majority of Jews living in Poland strictly adhered to the principles set in the Old Testament and Talmud. There was an idea to assimilate worshippers of Judaism into the Polish culture. Enthusiasts of this idea were, among others, Eliasz Accord and Mendel Lefin.4 In their plan, they referred to the concept of "maskils", followers of Moses Mendelssohn, the creator of haskalah, i.e. the Jewish enlightenment. Worshippers of Judaism did not serve in the army of the Crown and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.5 It resulted from i.a. religious differences and the common opinion that worshippers of Judaism were cowards.6 What is more, some radical Jews warned their fellow worshippers against any military service, which they found a breach of religious principles.7 However, during armed conflicts representa- tives of that minority were obligated to participate in defending cities and supplying 1 Historia Żydów Polskich, „Polityka”, wydanie specjalne. -
Barbour's Bruce and Haryls Wallace: Complements, Compensations and Conventions Grace G
Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 25 | Issue 1 Article 13 1990 Barbour's Bruce and Haryls Wallace: Complements, Compensations and Conventions Grace G. Wilson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Grace G. (1990) "Barbour's Bruce and Haryls Wallace: Complements, Compensations and Conventions," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 25: Iss. 1. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol25/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Grace G. Wilson Barbour's Bruce and Haryls Wallace: Complements, Compensations and Conventions In 1488 and 1489, John Ramsay co~ied Hary's Wallace and John Bar bour's Brnce into a pair of manuscripts. John Jamieson edited them as a pair in 1820.2 Before and after Jamieson, other readers felt a similar in clination to place the two poems side by side.3 This impulse is natural, for the Brnce and the Wallace are alike in several basic ways. The Brnce, fin ished by 1378, is the earliest long {13,645 lines in McDiarmid and Steven- 1Matthew P. McDiarmid, editor, Hary's ''Wallace; Scottish Text Society (hereafter STS), 4th series, 2 vols. (Edinburgh and London, 1968-69), I, ix, n. 1. All citations from the Wallace are from this edition. Matthew P. McDiarmid and James A. C. Stevenson, editors, Barbour's ''Bruce''; 'j4 fredom is a noble thingr, STS, 4th series, 3 vols. -
132 March 2019
Romanov News Новости Романовых By Ludmila & Paul Kulikovsky №132 March 2019 The monument to the Royal Martyrs at the St. Seraphim Cathedral in Vyatka "For the first time in 100 years, a descendant of the Romanovs appeared in Vyatka" From 17 to 20 of March the great-great-grandson of Alexander III, the great-grandson of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna - the sister of Emperor Nicholas II - Paul E. Kulikovsky and his wife Ludmila visited Vyatka. They were invited by the regional public organization "Revival of Vyatka". Paul E. Kulikovsky - "Kirov, or Vyatka as we prefer to call the city, was one of the places on our "to-visit-list", as we want to visit all the places in Russia directly related to the Romanovs, and especially those in which the Romanovs were in exile after the revolution. That is why first of all were visited Romanov related locations and city landmarks. But for the local citizens the main event was a presentation of the book of memoirs of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna “25 Chapters of my life”, followed by a press- conference. City history The city is actually called Kirov - in honour of one of the Stalin co- workers – Sergei Kirov killed in 1934 – but many citizens still use the historical name Vyatka. It was established in 1174. From 1457 to 1780 it was called Khlynov, from 1780 to 1934 Vyatka, and now Kirov. It is the administrative centre of the Kirov region and located on the Vyatka River, 896 km northeast of Moscow. Population is about 507,155 (2018). -
Electric Scotland's Weekly Newsletter for March 22Nd, 2019
Electric Scotland's Weekly Newsletter for March 22nd, 2019 For the latest news from Scotland see our ScotNews feed at: https://electricscotland.com/scotnews.htm Electric Scotland News We're now coming very near to decision day on Brexit. I truly hope that we leave on 29th March with a no deal and thus trade on WTO terms while we seek a new Free Trade deal with the EU. May's negotiated withdrawal deal is terrible for the UK and would keep us in the Common Market, Single Market and still under the ECJ. We would be a rule taker and have no say on any rules the EU put in force. To my mind there are only two choices... either we remain in the EU or we leave with no deal. Accepting May's negotiated deal would make things far worse for the UK. May has consistently lied to us and frankly is damaged goods. The Conservative party also lied to us as did Labour when they ran on a manifesto that clearly stated we would lave the EU. In a future election we must do everything we can to remove those MP's that lied to us. Also I have to say on a personal basis I'd love us to just leave as that would mean we could then focus on measures that would improve things for the UK and stop all the useless discussions that are going on. While I have been documenting this for historical purposes I have to say I'm rather sick fed up with it all.