Thuppan Nampoothiri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Thuppan Nampoothiri https://www.indiamart.com/thuppan-nampoothiri/ Kadiyakkol Thuppan Nampoothiri,from the famous traditional Thanthri (Priest) family named Kadiyakkol Illam, located near to Kottayam town in Kerala. About Us It was from the famous traditional Thanthri (Priest) family named Kadiyakkol Illam, located near to Kottayam town in Kerala. Since 1995, practicing thanthravrithy, has performed many "Bimba Prathishta"(Consecration of an Idol) and "Dhwaja Prathishta" , in the benediction of his Gurunathan(Teacher/Master) Brahmasri Kadiyakkol Krishnan Nampoothiri. Also he has gifted with the position of Thanthri (chief priest of temple) for more than 250 temple in India, including Kumaranalloor Devi temple, Ambalappuzha SreeKrishna Swami temple. Now practicing "Manthravaadam" (traditional Conjuration/Sorcery) like Sudarsana Homam, Aghora Homam, Aavaahanam. Thanthri is the Vedic head priest of Hindu temples in Kerala and a very few temples of coastal Karnataka in southern India. It is a position held hereditary. It is the thantri who installs the idol of the deity, and from that moment he assumes the position of the guru of the deity. The thantri has the final word on the rites and rituals of the temple. The Tantric Legacy started here in the era of Parasurama. Thantris and Shrauta are Namboothiri Brahmins who have studied the ancient tantras, and Poorva Mimamsa -- (the earliest part of the Vedas), unlike other Brahmins in India who are Smarta and follow Vedanta (latter parts of the Vedas). They have the sole right to conduct certain core rituals in temples of Kerala and Tulunadu. In temples like Kumaranalloor... For more information, please visit https://www.indiamart.com/thuppan-nampoothiri/aboutus.html POOJA AND HOMAM SERVICES P r o d u c t s & S e r v i c e s Maha Ganapathi Homam Thrikala Pooja Service Bhagavathiseva Service Mruthyunjaya Homam Service Navagraha Santhi Homam Service YANTHRA PRODUCTS P r o d u c t s & S e r v i c e s Akarshana Yantra Akhora Yanthra Apadudharana Yantra Ashwaroodha Yanthra F a c t s h e e t Year of Establishment : 1995 Nature of Business : Service Provider CONTACT US Thuppan Nampoothiri Contact Person: Manager Kannan Murali Lane, Kizhakke Nada, Kumaranalloor, Kottayam - 686016, Kerala, India https://www.indiamart.com/thuppan-nampoothiri/.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Civil
Civil Appeal No. 2732 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C)No.11295 of 2011) etc. Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala and ors. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/CIVIL ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2732 OF 2020 [Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.11295 of 2011] SRI MARTHANDA VARMA (D) THR. LRs. & ANR. …Appellants VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2733 OF 2020 [Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.12361 of 2011] AND WRIT PETITION(C) No.518 OF 2011 AND CONMT. PET.(C) No.493 OF 2019 IN SLP(C) No.12361 OF 2011 Civil Appeal No. 2732 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C)No.11295 of 2011) etc. Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala and ors. 2 J U D G M E N T Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11295 of 2011 and Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12361 of 2011. 2. Sree Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma who as Ruler of Covenanting State of Travancore had entered into a Covenant in May 1949 with the Government of India leading to the formation of the United State of Travancore and Cochin, died on 19.07.1991. His younger brother Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma and the Executive Officer of Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Temple’) as appellants 1 and 2 respectively have filed these appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the High Court1 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.36487 of 2009 and in Writ Petition (Civil) No.4256 of 2010.
[Show full text]
Freedom of Religion and the Indian Supreme Court: The
FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE INDIAN SUPREME COURT: THE RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION AND ESSENTIAL PRACTICES TESTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGION MAY 2019 By Coleman D. Williams Thesis Committee: Ramdas Lamb, Chairperson Helen Baroni Ned Bertz Abstract As a religiously diverse society and self-proclaimed secular state, India is an ideal setting to explore the complex and often controversial intersections between religion and law. The religious freedom clauses of the Indian Constitution allow for the state to regulate and restrict certain activities associated with religious practice. By interpreting the constitutional provisions for religious freedom, the judiciary plays an important role in determining the extent to which the state can lawfully regulate religious affairs. This thesis seeks to historicize the related development of two jurisprudential tests employed by the Supreme Court of India: the religious denomination test and the essential practices test. The religious denomination test gives the Court the authority to determine which groups constitute religious denominations, and therefore, qualify for legal protection. The essential practices test limits the constitutional protection of religious practices to those that are deemed ‘essential’ to the respective faith. From their origins in the 1950s up to their application in contemporary cases on religious freedom, these two tests have served to limit the scope of legal protection under the Constitution and legitimize the interventionist tendencies of the Indian state. Additionally, this thesis will discuss the principles behind the operation of the two tests, their most prominent criticisms, and the potential implications of the Court’s approach.
[Show full text]
Travancore Devaswom Board
Travancore Devaswom Board Why in news? The Travancore Devaswom Board and temple thantri’s Thazhamon family were referred often in the Sabarimala temple controversy. What are the temple boards in Kerala? Kerala has five Devaswom Boards, autonomous bodies under the state government, which manage the temples in the state and their assets, and ensure their smooth operation. Three out of five boards are Travancore, Cochin and Malabar Devaswom Boards. They manage around 3,000 temples among them. The other two are two temples, the Sree Koodalmanikyam Temple in Thrissur, and the Sri Guruvayur Temple, which have their own Devaswom Boards. All temples owned by the Travancore royal family passed under state control following the creation of the United States of Travancore and Cochin on 1949. The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), a separate, autonomous body to run the temples in the erstwhile princely state of Travancore was set up. With the formation of Kerala state in 1957, the TDB came under the state government. What are their functions? Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), the erstwhile royal family of Pandalam, and temple thantri’s Thazhamon family have stakes in the administration, traditions and rituals at the Sabarimala temple. 1. Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) The Board has a president and two members, who are nominated by the government. The TDB runs 1,249 temples, including Sabarimala. Sabarimala contibuted Rs 342 crore to the TDB in the last fiscal, Rs 73 crore of which was ploughed back into the shrine. The TDB appoints priests, assistants and other staff in its temples; it made history last year by appointing Dalit priests.
[Show full text]
Arsha Vidya Newsletter - May 2014 a Quantum Jump Always Looks Illogical, but It Has Its Own Logic
ArshaArsha VidyaVidya NewsletterNewsletter Rs. 15/- Vol. 15 May 2014 Issue 5 Arsha Vidya Pitham Arsha Vidya Gurukulam Arsha Vidya Gurukulam Swami Dayananda Ashram Institute of Vedanta and Institute of Vedanta and Sanskrit Sri Gangadhareswar Trust Sanskrit Sruti Seva Trust Purani Jhadi, Rishikesh P.O. Box No.1059 Anaikatti P.O. Pin 249 201, Uttarakhanda Saylorsburg, PA, 18353, USA Coimbatore 641 108 Ph.0135-2431769 Tel: 570-992-2339 Tel. 0422-2657001, Fax: 0135 2430769 Fax: 570-992-7150 Fax 91-0422-2657002 Website: www.dayananda.org 570-992-9617 Web Site : "http://www.arshavidya.in" Email: [email protected] Web Site : "http://www.arshavidya.org" Email: [email protected] Books Dept. : "http://books.arshavidya.org" Board of Trustees: Chairman: Board of Directors: Board of Trustees: Swami Dayananda President: Paramount Trustee: Saraswati Swami Dayananda Saraswati Swami Dayananda Saraswati Managing Trustee: Vice Presidents: Swami Viditatmananda Saraswati Swami Suddhananda Chairman: Swami Tattvavidananda Saraswati R. Santharam Trustees: Secretary: Swami Santatmananda Anand Gupta Trustees: Swami Jnanananda Treasurer: C. Soundar Raj Sri Rajni Kant Piyush and Avantika Shah P.R.Ramasubrahmaneya Rajhah Sri M.G. Srinivasan Asst. Secretary: Ravi Sam Sri M. Rajalingam Dr. Carol Whitfield N.K. Kejriwal T.A. Kandasamy Pillai Directors: Arsha Vijnana Gurukulam Ravi Gupta Drs.N.Balasubramaniam (Bala) & 72, Bharat Nagar M. Krishnan Amaravathi Road, Nagpur Arul Maharashtra 410 033 Ajay & Bharati Chanchani Phone: 91-0712-2523768 Dr.Urmila Gujarathi
[Show full text]
Sabarimala Is a Hindu Pilgrimage Center, Located in Kerala
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA WP NO. 373/2006 Indian Young Lawyers Association & ors. Petitioners Vs. The State of Kerala & Ors. Respondents (WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF ADV. V K BIJU SUPPORTING THE RESPONDENTS) SL.No. INDEX PAGES 1. Written Submissions of Adv. V K BIJU 2. ANNEXURE A-1 True copy of the relevant chapter of Raja Yoga of Swami Vivekananda 3. ANNEXURE A-2 True copy of the verse 14 of chapter 6 of Bhagwatgita, with its translation 4. ANNEXURE A-3 True copy of the order dated 9.10.2015 in Sri Marthanda Varma Versus State of Kerala in Slp © No 11295 of 2011 5. ANNEXURE A-4 True copy of the judgment Seven Juges Bench Judgment Daryao and others V. The State of U.P. reported in 1962 SCR 574 6. ANNEXURE A-5 True copy of the Tehseen Punawala v. Union of India reported in 2018 (6) SCC 72 7. ANNEXURE A-6 Copy of the judgment reported in 1967 (2) SCR 618 8. ANNEXURE A-7 Copy of the judgment reported in AIR 1925 PC 139 9. ANNEXURE A-8 Copy of the judgment reported in 1996 (9) SCC 548 10. ANNEXURE A-9 Copy of the judgment reported in 1968 (1) SCR 853 11. ANNEXURE A-10 Copy of the Commonwealth Australia Debates dated 7.2.1898 (see Pg. , Sir Edward Braddon) 12. ANNEXURE A-11 Order dated 13.2.2014 Passed by this Hon’ble Court in Devadasi case (Pg ) 13. ANNEXURE A-12 Directions/Order dated 12.2.2016 Passed by this Hon’ble Court in Devadasi case (Pg to ) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA WP NO.
[Show full text]
Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Civil
Civil Appeal No. 2732 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C)No.11295 of 2011) etc. Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala and ors. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/CIVIL ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2732 OF 2020 [Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.11295 of 2011] SRI MARTHANDA VARMA (D) THR. LRs. & ANR. …Appellants VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2733 OF 2020 [Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.12361 of 2011] AND WRIT PETITION(C) No.518 OF 2011 AND CONMT. PET.(C) No.493 OF 2019 IN SLP(C) No.12361 OF 2011 Civil Appeal No. 2732 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C)No.11295 of 2011) etc. Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala and ors. 2 J U D G M E N T Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11295 of 2011 and Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12361 of 2011. 2. Sree Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma who as Ruler of Covenanting State of Travancore had entered into a Covenant in May 1949 with the Government of India leading to the formation of the United State of Travancore and Cochin, died on 19.07.1991. His younger brother Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma and the Executive Officer of Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Temple’) as appellants 1 and 2 respectively have filed these appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the High Court1 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.36487 of 2009 and in Writ Petition (Civil) No.4256 of 2010.
[Show full text]
1 000000069 Ganga Khalsa 26,Punit Nagar -3 B/H Paras
JINDAL SAW LTD STATEMENT OF UNPAID OR UNCLAIMED DIVIDEND AND TRANFERRED TO GENERAL REVENUE ACCOUNT OF THE CENTRAL GOVERMENT PURSUNT TO SECTION 20S-A(6) S.NO FOLIO NO REGISTERED NAME OF THE MEMBER TO WHOM LAST KNOW address of the person(s) ENTITIED TO RECIVE THE NO OF SHARES DATE OF DATE OF TRANSFER AMOUNT DUE ON TOTAL AMOUNT LEDGER CONTAINING THE AMOUNT OF DIVIDEND IS DUE AMOUNT HELD/EQUITY DECLARATION TO UNPAID DIVIDEND EQUITY DUE AND UNPAID PARTICULAR (TO BE GIVEN ) IN ALPHABETICAL PREFRENCE AS PER THE ORDER COMPANIES UNPAID DIVIDEND A/C IN AXIS BANK NEW DELHI 110001 GANGA KHALSA 26,PUNIT NAGAR -3 B/H PARAS KUNJ, SATELLITE 1 000000069 ROAD AHMEDABAD 380015 300 27-03-2008 02-04-2008 1875 27-04-2015 RAKESH K GUPTA 25/228 VIDYA NAGAR SOCIETY P O POLYTECHNIC 2 000000125 AHMEDABAD 380015 300 27-03-2008 02-04-2008 1875 27-04-2015 B R UMADEVI 141/1 DR D V GUNDAPPA ROAD BASAVANAGUDI 3 000000253 BANGALORE 560004 100 27-03-2008 02-04-2008 625 27-04-2015 V VASUDEVA RAO AGM CANARA BANK CREDIT WING 112 J C ROAD 4 000000400 BANGALORE 560002 250 27-03-2008 02-04-2008 1563 27-04-2015 RAMASAMY ESWARAN 183 7TH CROSS HMT LAYOUT MATHIKERE P O 5 000000592 BANGALORE 560054 100 27-03-2008 02-04-2008 625 27-04-2015 TONY CHACKO ELLATHUKUDY HOUSE KUTHUKUZHI P O 6 000000777 KOTHAMANGALAM KERALA 686691 300 27-03-2008 02-04-2008 1875 27-04-2015 RANI CHANDY W/O DR ZACHARIA ABRAHAM TATA TEA GENERAL 7 000000784 HOSPITAL MUNNAR 100 27-03-2008 02-04-2008 625 27-04-2015 MRS A VANAJAKSHI 56 A B S SUNDARAM ROAD D L M COLONY TIRUPUR 8 000000932 COIMBATORE DISTRICT 638601
[Show full text]
Cera Sanitaryware Limited
CERA SANITARYWARE LIMITED Statement of Amount of Unpaid/Unclaimed Dividend of the F.Y. 2015-16 as on 10th September 2020 Sr. Investor First Name Investor Middle Name Investor Last Name Father/Husband First Name Father/Husband Father/Husband Last Address Country State City/District Pincode Folio No Amount Proposed Date of No. Middle Name Name Unpaid transfer to IEPF 1 NAND KISHORE MAHESHWARI KISHORE MAHESHWARI 30 HASUBHAI PARK NR JODHPUR GOAN SATELLITE ROAD INDIA GUJARAT AHMEDABAD 380015 CSL00000003 36.00 29-AUG-2023 AHMEDABAD 2 SHAILESH B TRIVEDI B TRIVEDI B-9 SETU BUNGLOW SATELLITE ROAD AHMEDABAD INDIA GUJARAT AHMEDABAD 380015 CSL00000008 36.00 29-AUG-2023 3 MANGALJI VAGHJI SHAH VAGHJI SHAH 27 VRUNDAVAN MEVAWALA FLAT KIRAN PARK ROAD NAVA INDIA GUJARAT AHMEDABAD 380013 CSL00000027 1080.00 29-AUG-2023 VADAJ AHMEDABAD 4 JAGJIVANDAS LILADHARBHAI LILADHARBHAI C/O LILADHAR VAGHJIBHAI NAROTTAM BLDG. KAPASIA INDIA GUJARAT AHMEDABAD 380001 CSL00000029 2160.00 29-AUG-2023 BAZAR AHMEDABAD 5 AMBARAM GIRDHARDAS GIRDHARDAS 953,OPP.HARGOVAN KEYUR POLE GHEEKANTA ROAD INDIA GUJARAT AHMEDABAD 380001 CSL00000032 1080.00 29-AUG-2023 AHMEDABAD 6 RAMJIBHAI LADHABHAI LADHABHAI C/O HARSHADBHAI RAMJIBHAI 82 HARIOM NAGAR SOC INDIA GUJARAT AHMEDABAD 382415 CSL00000033 10800.00 29-AUG-2023 GAURI CINEMA RD NR RAJDEEP PARK ODHAV AHMEDABAD 7 GHANSHYAMLAL NARANDAS PATEL NARANDAS PATEL NAROTTAM BLDG. KAPASIA BAZAR AHMEDABAD INDIA GUJARAT AHMEDABAD 380001 CSL00000035 1080.00 29-AUG-2023 8 GALABHAI BAPUDAS PATEL BAPUDAS PATEL KOLVADA STATION RANDHEJA GANDHINAGAR DIST
[Show full text]
Temples, Courts, and Dynamic Equilibrium in the Indian Constitution
Alabama Law Scholarly Commons Articles Faculty Scholarship 2016 Temples, Courts, and Dynamic Equilibrium in the Indian Constitution Deepa Das Acevedo University of Alabama - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles Recommended Citation Deepa Das Acevedo, Temples, Courts, and Dynamic Equilibrium in the Indian Constitution, 64 Am. J. Comp. L. 555 (2016). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles/80 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. DEEPA DAS ACEVEDO* Temples, Courts, and Dynamic Equilibrium in the Indian Constitutiont Must all states have fixed constitutional identities? Does democ- racy necessarily entail citizen-sovereignty? This Article uses ethno- graphic data from India to argue that the answer to both questions is "no." In the aftermath of a massive stampede in 2011, the Kerala High Court initiated an overhaul of the complex executive, legislative, and judicial network that governs the famous Hindu temple at Sabari- mala. The court's conflicting goals were to avoid further consolidating government authority over the temple and to further empower officials so that they could undertake needed reforms. Ultimately the court did both-and neither-in an instance of judicial balancing that reflects the two visions of sovereignty in India. On the one hand, Indian consti- tutional law and judicialpractice reflect a conventional vision of sov- ereignty, in which sovereign authority is wholly vested in citizens and merely exercised on their behalf by the state.
[Show full text]
Sabarimala Temple and the District Magistrate of Pathanamthitta to Ensure Entry of Female Devotees Between the Age Group of 10 To
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 373 OF 2006 Indian Young Lawyers Association …Petitioner(s) & Ors. VERSUS The State of Kerala & Ors. …Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Dipak Misra, CJI (for himself and A.M. Khanwilkar, J.) Introduction The irony that is nurtured by the society is to impose a rule, however unjustified, and proffer explanation or justification to substantiate the substratum of the said rule. Mankind, since time immemorial, has been searching for explanation or justification to substantiate a point of view that hurts humanity. The theoretical human values remain on paper. Historically, women have been treated with inequality and that is why, many have fought for their rights. Susan B. Anthony, known for her 2 feminist activity, succinctly puts, “Men, their rights, and nothing more; women, their rights, and nothing less.” It is a clear message. 2. Neither the said message nor any kind of philosophy has opened up the large populace of this country to accept women as partners in their search for divinity and spirituality. In the theatre of life, it seems, man has put the autograph and there is no space for a woman even to put her signature. There is inequality on the path of approach to understand the divinity. The attribute of devotion to divinity cannot be subjected to the rigidity and stereotypes of gender. The dualism that persists in religion by glorifying and venerating women as goddesses on one hand and by imposing rigorous sanctions on the other hand in matters of devotion has to be abandoned.
[Show full text]