DOCSLIB.ORG

“For the Discovery of the Origin of the Broken Symmetry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“For the Discovery of the Origin of the Broken Symmetry 2008 NOBEL LAUREATES The Nobel Prize in Physics 2008 LIBRARY PHOTO KULYK/SCIENCE MEHAU “for the discovery “for the discovery of the origin of the mechanism of of the broken symmetry spontaneous which predicts the existence broken symmetry in of at least three families of subatomic physics” quarks in nature” (KEK) NIVERSITY RESEARCH ation U Z yoto K organi accelerator ENERGY IGH H LLOYD DEGRANE/THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LLOYD Yoichiro Nambu Makoto Kobayashi Toshihide Maskawa 1/2 of the prize 1/4 of the prize 1/4 of the prize Born: 1921 Born: 1944 Born: 1940 Birthplace: Japan Birthplace: Japan Birthplace: Japan Nationality: US citizen Nationality: Nationality: Current position: Japanese citizen Japanese citizen Harry Pratt Judson Current position: Current position: Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus, Professor Emeritus, Professor Emeritus, High Energy Accelerator Yukawa Institute for Enrico Fermi Institute, Research Organization Theoretical Physics (YITP), University of Chicago, (KEK), Tsukuba, Japan Kyoto University, Japan Illinois, USA PHYSICS 1 Copyright © Nobel Web AB 2008. Nobelprize.org, Nobel Prize and the Nobel Prize medal design mark are registered trademarks of the Nobel Foundation. 2008 NOBEL LAUREATES Speed read: The importance of asymmetry uckily for us, the Universe is not symmetrical, would have resulted. Instead, a small imbalance, or at least at the subatomic level. If it was, the asymmetry, in the amount of matter and antimatter L newly formed matter at the Universe’s birth created led to a slight excess of matter, from which would have been annihilated by an equal and we are all eventually formed. Such so-called ‘broken opposite amount of antimatter, and nothingness symmetry’ is one key to our existence. Understanding symmetry, or the lack of it, is an ongoing task, and the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics rewarded two discoveries concerning symmetry violation in the field of particle physics. In the 1960s Yoichiro Nambu, who had been working on asymmetries underlying superconductivity, was the first to model how broken symmetry can occur spontaneously at the subatomic level. The mathematical descriptions he formulated helped refine the standard model of particle physics, the current working theory that best explains much, but not all, of the way that fundamental particles and the forces that govern their behaviour interact to create the known Universe. In the early 1970s, Kobayashi and Maskawa formulated a model that explained certain symmetry violations that had recently surprised observers in particle physics experiments. Their model suggested that the collection of subatomic particles known at Tsung Dao Lee and Chen Ning Sheldon Glashow proposes how two of Building on Glashow’s theories, Yang propose that the laws the four fundamental interactions in Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam of mirror image symmetry nature, electromagnetism and the weak formulate the unification of the are broken in the world of interaction, are unified, on the basis of electromagnetic and weak subatomic physics spontaneous symmetry breaking interactions in the Standard Model 1956 1960 1961 1964 1967–1968 1973 Yoichiro Nambu Several physicists propose that Studies at CERN, describes how broken symmetry breaking gives rise to Geneva provide the first symmetry can occur a particle that provides mass to experimental evidence spontaneously at the all other particles — later to support the Standard subatomic level known as the Higgs boson Model Timeline: Milestones for the 2008 Nobel Laureate in Physics, Yoichiro Nambu. 2 PHYSICS Copyright © Nobel Web AB 2008. Nobelprize.org, Nobel Prize and the Nobel Prize medal design mark are registered trademarks of the Nobel Foundation. 2008 NOBEL LAUREATES the time was insufficient to explain the observed behaviours, and predicted the existence of as yet ibrary undiscovered elementary particles. It did not, how- L ever, specify precisely what form these particles hoto should take. Kobayashi and Maskawa hypothesized P the existence of a third family of quarks, which are CIENCE some of the building blocks from which all matter K/S and antimatter are formed. They then had to wait ARLIC almost three decades for the experimental results G that would fully verify their hypothesis. The existence ARK of all three families was finally confirmed when the M last member was observed in the mid 1990s. Symmetry breaking in particle physics continues to be the focus of intense speculation and investigation. One of the most infamous examples of symmetry breaking, the particle or set of particles known as the Higgs boson, thought to be responsible for breaking the symmetry between electromagnetism and the so-called weak nuclear force, could help solve one of the greatest outstanding questions in physics – how particles acquire mass. Whether or not this mysterious particle exists will be the main subject of scrutiny at the Large Hadron Collider, the giant particle accelerator soon to go into operation outside Geneva, Switzerland. James Cronin and Val Fitch experimentally detect a new Charm quark discovered at First quark of the third violation in the symmetry Stanford Linear Accelerator family, the bottom laws in a subatomic particle Center, USA, and CERN, quark, discovered at known as a kaon Geneva, Switzerland Fermilab, USA 1964 1973 1974 1975 1977 1994 Kobayashi and Maskawa publish their Martin Perl discovers Top quark model proposing why symmetry is broken the first new member discovered in subatomic particles, and predict the of the third family: at Fermilab existence of a third family of quarks the tau lepton Timeline: Milestones for the 2008 Nobel Laureates in Physics, Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa. PHYSICS 3 Copyright © Nobel Web AB 2008. Nobelprize.org, Nobel Prize and the Nobel Prize medal design mark are registered trademarks of the Nobel Foundation. 2008 NOBEL LAUREATES In his own words: Yoichiro Nambu y his own admission the concept that Yoichiro Nambu devised in the early 1960s — that hicago of spontaneous broken symmetry in particle C OF B physics — is “a bit difficult to explain” in simple terms. But while lecturing the day before he had been awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics, Nambu NIVERSITY chanced upon an elegant analogy to describe how U HE such broken symmetry can occur spontaneously. /T RANE G “I saw a roomful of people all looking towards me E and I thought that’s strange, why do they look only D in one direction?” But if one person in that crowd loyd L turns their head and looks in the opposite direction then of course people nearby will turn around to Yoichiro Nambu at the University of Chicago. see what that person is looking at. “So there is a kind of wave propagating from that person. And that is the wave associated with broken symmetry.” Nambu eventually joined his group, and thanks Having begun his career as a theoretical physicist to Tomonaga’s recommendation Nambu was able in Japan during the Second World War, Nambu to get a job first in Japan and then at Robert is no stranger to looking for explanations in the Oppenheimer’s Institute at Princeton University. midst of turmoil. Nambu describes being “lucky The few years he originally planned to spend in enough” to get a research position at the University America would become a lifetime. “I was not able to of Tokyo after the war, though he was working do good research to my satisfaction while I was in under conditions that are a world away from the Princeton, so I wanted to stay for a few more years conditions enjoyed by most physicists nowadays. in America before going back to Japan.” Fortunately “I spent two, three years sleeping in my office, Nambu was able to get a postdoctoral position at shared with maybe eight or so people. Everyday I the world-renowned Physics Department at the had to go shopping, and sleep on my desk.” But the University of Chicago. “I jumped at the opportunity! bleak conditions did provide one huge advantage, I came here and I have stayed here ever since.” says Nambu: “I kept thinking about physics.” All of which illustrates the virtues of being in the By good fortune, a student of Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, right place at the right time, and Nambu feels who would receive the Nobel Prize in Physics in grateful to have been a theoretical physicist at the 1965, happened to be working at the neighbouring time he began his research. “I was very fortunate. desk. By discovering what Tomonaga was doing Particle physics was created in the early 1930s. Ernest Lawrence invented the cyclotron on the one hand, and [Hideki] Yukawa in Japan invented “If one person in that crowd particle physics, the theoretical side, and they went turns their head and looks in along side by side.” the opposite direction then When asked whether young physicists should follow of course people nearby will his example and only eat and think about physics, Nambu laughs. “Yes! That’s a very good thing! turn around to see what that My whole career was formed by the three years I person is looking at” was in Tokyo.” This article is based on a telephone interview with Yoichiro Nambu following the announcement of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics. To listen to the interview in full, visit http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2008/nambu-interview.html 4 PHYSICS Copyright © Nobel Web AB 2008. Nobelprize.org, Nobel Prize and the Nobel Prize medal design mark are registered trademarks of the Nobel Foundation. 2008 NOBEL LAUREATES In his own words: Makoto Kobayashi hen recalling the groundbreaking theory predicted that there had to be one more. he developed with Toshihide Maskawa “At first we were not confident about this six quarks Wthat has been rewarded with the 2008 scheme, but gradually we came to believe that this Nobel Prize in Physics, Makoto Kobayashi reveals actually is the case.” a refreshing degree of honesty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of
    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Weinberg Cv Born
    STEVEN WEINBERG CV BORN: May 3, 1933, in New York, N.Y. EDUCATION: Cornell University, 1950–1954 (A.B., 1954) Copenhagen Institute for Theoretical Physics, 1954–1955 Princeton University, 1955–1957 (Ph.D.,1957). HONORARY DEGREES: Harvard University, A.M., 1973 Knox College, D.Sc., 1978 University of Chicago, Sc.D., 1978 University of Rochester, Sc.D., l979 Yale University, Sc.D., 1979 City University of New York,Sc.D., 1980 Clark University, Sc.D., 1982 Dartmouth College, Sc.D., 1984 Weizmann Institute, Ph.D. Hon.Caus., 1985 Washington College, D.Litt., 1985 Columbia University, Sc.D., 1990 University of Salamanca, Sc.D., 1992 University of Padua, Ph.D. Hon.Caus., 1992 University of Barcelona, Sc.D., 1996 Bates College, Sc. D., 2002 McGill University, Sc. D., 2003 University of Waterloo, Sc. D., 2004 Renssalear Polytechnic Institue, Sc. D., 2016 Rockefeller University, Sc. D., 2017 PRESENT POSITION: Josey Regental Professor of Science, University of Texas, 1982– PAST POSITIONS: Columbia University, 1957–1959 Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, 1959–1960 University of California, Berkeley, 1960–1969 On leave, Imperial College, London, 1961–1962 Steven Weinberg 2 Became full professor, 1964 On leave, Harvard University, 1966–1967 On leave, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1967–1969 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1969–1973, Professor of Physics Harvard University, 1973–1983, Higgins Professor of Physics On leave 1976–1977, as Visiting Professor of Physics, Stanford University Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1973-1983, Senior
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of Scientific Communities in Japan^
    The Growth of Scientific Communities in Japan^ Mitsutomo Yuasa** 1. Introdution The first university in Japan on the European system was Tokyo Imperial University, established in 1877. Twenty years later, Kyoto Imperial University was founded in 1897. Among the graduates from the latter university can be found two post World War II Nobel Prize winners in physics, namely, Hideki Yukawa (in 1949), and Shinichiro Tomonaga (in 1965). We may say that Japan attained her scientific maturity nearly a century after the arrival of Commodore Perry in 1853 for the purpose of opening her ports. Incidentally, two scientists in the U.S.A. were awarded the Nobel Prize before 1920, namely, A. A. Michelson (physics in 1907), and T. W. Richard (chemistry in 1914). On this point, Japan lagged about fifty years behind the U.S.A. Japanese scientists began to achieve international recognition in the 1890's. This period conincides with the dates of the establishment of the Cabinet System, the promulgation of the Constitution of the Japanese Empire and the opening of the Imperial Diet, 1885, 1889, and 1890 respectively. Shibasaburo Kitazato (1852-1931), discovered the serum treatment for tetanus in 1890, Jiro ICitao (1853- 1907), made public his theories on the movement of atomospheric currents and typhoons in 1887, and Hantaro Nagaoka (1865-1950), published his research on the distortion of magnetism in 1889, and his idea on the structure of the atom in 1903. These three representative scientists were all closely related to Tokyo Imperial University, as graduates and latter, as professors. But we cannot forget to men tion that the main studies of Kitazato and Kitao were made, not in Japan, but in Germany, under the guidance of great scientists of that country, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Charles D. Ferguson, on Behalf Of
    FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS T: 202/546-3300 1725 DeSales Street, NW 6th Floor Washington, DC 20036 www.fas.org F: 202/675-1010 [email protected] PRM-70-9 DOCKETED Board of Sponsors (75FR80730) USNRC (PartialList) March 4, 2011 March 7, 2011 (10:30 am) •Pacr Agre * SidnheyAman * Philip W. Anderson *Kenneth J. Arrow To: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OFFICE OF SECRETARY * David Baltimore RULEMAKINGS AND * Bamj Be.....ea Washington, DC 20555-0001 SPaulBerg ADJUDICATIONS STAFF * J. Michael Bishop AT-TN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff * Guther Blobel * Nicolaas Bloensbergen * Paul Boyce Ann Pitts Carter Subject: Comment on Docket ID NRC-2010-0372, "Petition for Rulemaking, * Stanley Cohen * Leon N. Cooper Francis Slakey on Behalf of the American Physical Society" * E. J. Corey 'James Cronin * Johann Deismehofer ArmDruyan *RenatoDulbeomo As Board Members of the Federation of American Scientists, an independent, Paul L Ehrlich George Field nonpartisan think tank, we strongly support the petition submitted by the Vat L. Fitch * JeromeI. Friedman American Physical Society that requests proliferation risk assessments become a * Riccardo Giacoani * Walter Gilbert required part of the NRC licensing process. * Alfed G. Gilman " Donald Glaser * Sheldon L. Glashow Marvin L. Goidhergr * Joseph L. Goldstein Emerging nuclear fuel technologies such as laser enrichment of uranium can pose Roger C. L. Gaillemin * L[land H. Hartwell significant proliferation risks due to difficulties in detecting facilities using these * Herbert A. Hauptman " Dudley RKHIaechach technologies. If such technologies are developed without a clear, objective, and * Roald Hoff-aan John P. Hoidren detailed assessment, they can dangerously undermine U.S. nuclear * -l Robert Horvitz * David H.
    [Show full text]
  • HOPE Meetings Are Held for Excellent Graduate Students and Young Researchers Specially Selected from Countries Around the 9Th Asia-Pacific and Africa Region
    For Overseas Cooperating Institutions Objective HOPE Meetings are held for excellent graduate students and young researchers specially selected from countries around the 9th Asia-Pacific and Africa region. These meetings give an opportunity for the participants to engage in interdisciplinary discussions with Nobel laureates and other distinguished HOPE MEETING scientists pioneering the frontiers of knowledge. They also give the participants, who lodge together over the course of the event, a chance to make friends and form collegial networks with Nobel Laureates with peers from the regions. The title “HOPE Meeting” signifies the promise held for the future roles of young researchers and optimism for creating a bright S&T future within the global community. Date F ebruary 26- ■ Saturday, February 25: Orientation & Registration M arch 2, 2017 ■ Sunday, February 26: Nobel Prize Dialogue Tokyo 2017 Organizer Venue Tokyo , JAPAN Office of the HOPE Meetings, JSPS E-mail [email protected] Tel: +81-3-3263-2414 Fax:+81-3-3234-3700 HOPE MEETINGS with Nobel Laureates Organizing Committee of the HOPE Meetings ■ Chair Makoto Kobayashi <Nobel Laureate in Physics 2008> Honorary Professor Emeritus, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ■ Members Noriko Osumi Mitsuhiko Shionoya Tohoku University The University of Tokyo Takaaki Kajita <Nobel Laureate in Physics 2015> Yousuke Takahama The University of Tokyo Tokushima University Kazuhiro Kosuge Fumio Hanaoka Tohoku University Tsukuba University Program of the HOPE Meeting The program
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest Rutherford and the Accelerator: “A Million Volts in a Soapbox”
    Ernest Rutherford and the Accelerator: “A Million Volts in a Soapbox” AAPT 2011 Winter Meeting Jacksonville, FL January 10, 2011 H. Frederick Dylla American Institute of Physics Steven T. Corneliussen Jefferson Lab Outline • Rutherford's call for inventing accelerators ("million volts in a soap box") • Newton, Franklin and Jefferson: Notable prefiguring of Rutherford's call • Rutherfords's discovery: The atomic nucleus and a new experimental method (scattering) • A century of particle accelerators AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 Rutherford’s call for inventing accelerators 1911 – Rutherford discovered the atom’s nucleus • Revolutionized study of the submicroscopic realm • Established method of making inferences from particle scattering 1927 – Anniversary Address of the President of the Royal Society • Expressed a long-standing “ambition to have available for study a copious supply of atoms and electrons which have an individual energy far transcending that of the alpha and beta particles” available from natural sources so as to “open up an extraordinarily interesting field of investigation.” AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 Rutherford’s wish: “A million volts in a soapbox” Spurred the invention of the particle accelerator, leading to: • Rich fundamental understanding of matter • Rich understanding of astrophysical phenomena • Extraordinary range of particle-accelerator technologies and applications AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 From Newton, Jefferson & Franklin to Rutherford’s call for inventing accelerators Isaac Newton, 1717, foreseeing something like quarks and the nuclear strong force: “There are agents in Nature able to make the particles of bodies stick together by very strong attractions. And it is the business of Experimental Philosophy to find them out.
    [Show full text]
  • Luis Alvarez: the Ideas Man
    CERN Courier March 2012 Commemoration Luis Alvarez: the ideas man The years from the early 1950s to the late 1980s came alive again during a symposium to commemorate the birth of one of the great scientists and inventors of the 20th century. Luis Alvarez – one of the greatest experimental physicists of the 20th century – combined the interests of a scientist, an inventor, a detective and an explorer. He left his mark on areas that ranged from radar through to cosmic rays, nuclear physics, particle accel- erators, detectors and large-scale data analysis, as well as particles and astrophysics. On 19 November, some 200 people gathered at Berkeley to commemorate the 100th anniversary of his birth. Alumni of the Alvarez group – among them physicists, engineers, programmers and bubble-chamber film scanners – were joined by his collaborators, family, present-day students and admirers, as well as scientists whose professional lineage traces back to him. Hosted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) and the University of California at Berkeley, the symposium reviewed his long career and lasting legacy. A recurring theme of the symposium was, as one speaker put it, a “Shakespeare-type dilemma”: how could one person have accom- plished all of that in one lifetime? Beyond his own initiatives, Alvarez created a culture around him that inspired others to, as George Smoot put it, “think big,” as well as to “think broadly and then deep” and to take risks. Combined with Alvarez’s strong scientific standards and great care in execut- ing them, these principles led directly to the awarding of two Nobel Luis Alvarez celebrating the announcement of his 1968 Nobel prizes in physics to scientists at Berkeley – George Smoot in 2006 prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter
    Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 Volume 5 • Number 1 worldscinet.com/appn Takaaki Kajita 2015 Physics Nobel Laureate published by Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University (IAS@NTU) and South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association (SEATPA) South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 • Volume 5 • Number 1 A publication of the IAS@NTU Singapore and SEATPA Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter publishes articles reporting frontier discoveries in EDITORIAL physics, research highlights, and news to facilitate interaction, collaboration and 3 cooperation among physicists in Asia Pacific physics community. PEOPLE Editor-in-Chief 4 “Observing the Distant Supernova” — Interview with Kok Khoo Phua Nobel Laureate Prof Brian Schmidt Associate Editor-in-Chief “Discovering the W and Z Bosons” — Interview with Swee Cheng Lim Nobel Laureate Prof Carlo Rubbia SEATPA Committee Christopher C Bernido Phil Chan Leong Chuan Kwek Choy Heng Lai Swee Cheng Lim Ren Bao Liu Hwee Boon Low Anh Ký Nguyên Choo Hiap Oh OPINION AND COMMENTARY Kok Khoo Phua 10 China’s Great Scientific Leap Forward: Completion of a Roh Suan Tung Preecha Yupapin planned ‘Great Collider’ would transform particle physics Hishamuddin Zainuddin Freddy Zen Editorial Team NEWS Sen Mu 12 CityU’s Institute for Advanced Study will Champion Bold New Han Sun Chi Xiong Research Initiatives Case made for 'Ninth Planet' Graphic Designers Chuan Ming Loo Erin Ong Cover Photo: "Takaaki Kajita 5171- 2015" by Bengt Nyman - Own work.
    [Show full text]
  • SHELDON LEE GLASHOW Lyman Laboratory of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., USA
    TOWARDS A UNIFIED THEORY - THREADS IN A TAPESTRY Nobel Lecture, 8 December, 1979 by SHELDON LEE GLASHOW Lyman Laboratory of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., USA INTRODUCTION In 1956, when I began doing theoretical physics, the study of elementary particles was like a patchwork quilt. Electrodynamics, weak interactions, and strong interactions were clearly separate disciplines, separately taught and separately studied. There was no coherent theory that described them all. Developments such as the observation of parity violation, the successes of quantum electrodynamics, the discovery of hadron resonances and the appearance of strangeness were well-defined parts of the picture, but they could not be easily fitted together. Things have changed. Today we have what has been called a “standard theory” of elementary particle physics in which strong, weak, and electro- magnetic interactions all arise from a local symmetry principle. It is, in a sense, a complete and apparently correct theory, offering a qualitative description of all particle phenomena and precise quantitative predictions in many instances. There is no experimental data that contradicts the theory. In principle, if not yet in practice, all experimental data can be expressed in terms of a small number of “fundamental” masses and cou- pling constants. The theory we now have is an integral work of art: the patchwork quilt has become a tapestry. Tapestries are made by many artisans working together. The contribu- tions of separate workers cannot be discerned in the completed work, and the loose and false threads have been covered over. So it is in our picture of particle physics. Part of the picture is the unification of weak and electromagnetic interactions and the prediction of neutral currents, now being celebrated by the award of the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twenty-First Century Paradigm and the Role of Information Technology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Chapter 2 The Twenty-First Century Paradigm and the Role of Information Technology In Chap. 1 , we considered demand by roughly classifying it into two types: “diffusive demand” and “creative demand.” The “paradigm of the twentieth century and before” was characterized by diffu- sive demand. The paradigm was constituted by a material desire to satisfy needs for food, clothing, and shelter, as well as transportation, and social mobility. Many of the industries that came into being in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were intended to satisfy such desires. I describe those material desires as diffusive demand leading to a “saturation of man-made objects .” It follows that new demand in the twenty-fi rst century will be generated by a new paradigm. Thus, in this chapter fi rst describes what the paradigms of the twenty-fi rst century are and then refl ects on the role played by the knowledge explosion, one of those paradigms, and the role played by information technology, which looks as if it came into being to solve problems created by the knowledge explosion. Exploding Knowledge, Limited Earth, and Aging Society What are the paradigms of the twenty-fi rst century? I believe there are three, which I classify as “exploding knowledge ,” “limited earth,” and “aging society” (Fig. 2.1 ). These three paradigms do not represent anything that is either good or bad for humanity. Each constitutes a basic framework containing both light and shadow. For instance, there has been an explosive increase in knowledge .
    [Show full text]
  • Enrico Fermi
    Fermi, Enrico Inventors and Inventions Enrico Fermi Italian American physicist Fermi helped develop Fermi-Dirac statistics, which liceo (secondary school) and, on the advice of Amidei, elucidate the group behavior of elementary particles. joined the Scuola Normale Superiore at Pisa. This elite He also developed the theory of beta decay and college, attached to the University of Pisa, admitted only discovered neutron-induced artificial radioactivity. forty of Italy’s top students, who were given free board Finally, he succeeded in producing the first sustained and lodging. Fermi performed exceedingly well in the nuclear chain reaction, which led to the discovery highly competitive entrance exam. He completed his of nuclear energy and the development of the university education after only four years of research and atomic bomb. studies, receiving his Ph.D. in physics from the Univer- sity of Pisa and his undergraduate diploma from the Born: September 29, 1901; Rome, Italy Scuola Normale Superiore in July, 1922. He became Died: November 28, 1954; Chicago, Illinois an expert theoretical physicist and a talented exper- Primary field: Physics imentalist. This rare combination provided a solid foun- Primary inventions: Controlled nuclear chain dation for all his subsequent inventions. reaction; Fermi-Dirac statistics; theory of beta decay Life’s Work After postdoctoral work at the University of Göttingen, Early Life in Germany (1922-1923), and the University of Leiden, Enrico Fermi (ehn-REE-koh FUR-mee) was the third in the Netherlands (fall, 1924), Fermi took an interim po- child of Alberto Fermi and Ida de Gattis. Enrico was very sition at the University of Florence in December, 1924.
    [Show full text]