CONTEXTUALIZING ALAN CLARKE’S SHORT MOVIE ‘ELEPHANT’: THE HISTORICAL APPROACH

Hotman Nasution1 Universitas Putera Batam, Batam, Kepri, Indonesia [email protected]

Tomi Arianto2 Universitas Putera Batam, Batam, Kepri, Indonesia [email protected]

ABSTRACT The descriptive-qualitative paper purports an in-depth reading of the Trouble event depiction in Elephant movie by applying Greenblatt’s theory of Historicism. Elephant movie contains only 16 murders in a repeated and exact manners with no context and dialogue other than a sentence in the opening movie. New Historicism is expected to explain why the movie presents in such a way by correlating one to each other; the movie and the history. The data would be collected through observation and analyzed with content analyses method. The symmetrical positioning of the literary work and the history explains (1) how the massive censorship of media and the extremely strict rule in shaped the idea of producing Elephant with covert relation to either political party in conflict (2) the absence of people who was responsible of the conflict explains the vagueness of who killed and who was killed, and (3) the erasure of characterization of the characters coincide with the cluelessness of who was the real victim.

Keywords: sectarian violence, elephant, alan clarke, the troubles, historical approach

1. INTRODUCTION The Troubles conflict is one of the between settlers and natives. In the past most complex conflicts in the world and year, there was a settlement by the it has been over for about thirty-one British government who transferred years occurred in the entire Northern English and Scotland people and they Ireland. However, the conflict is more were mostly protestant. This settlement than about two religion in conflict; slowly revealed the real purpose of protestant and catholic. The Troubles British to overtake the land they were was initially about a conflict of land; struggled to take. Then, later initiation of

103 | P a g e

union of both parties was attempted and appears. The approach attempts only to the release of order by Ireland and criticize and interpret literary works British government could not satisfy and based on three important keys; race, bring peace for each party. As a result, milieu and moment. The keys could the conflict ignited from 1960s to 1998s provide the zeitgeist and author’s view which ended with Good Friday produced in the literary work and both Agreement. This three-decades of landscapes could also verify the conflict was devastating and taken many historical depiction of the work. lives which was fortunately documented Historical approach is still relevant in when media reports were difficult to do. terms of verifying and describing Unfortunately, there are less textually of the historical side of the movies who depicted overtly of the work. For instance, the history of Trouble, but Elephant remains the most Hiroshima in John Hersey’s Hiroshima significant movie referring to the Trouble (Henra & Jusmaya, 2019). despite having no context, However, historical approach characterization, and dialogue. Elephant cannot be applied in order to is a 36-minutes short movie directed by contextualize Elephant because historical Alan Clarke, an important British approach failed to recognize the filmmaker. On the contrary, his complexity nature of the history (Tyson, nationality contrasts with the theme and 2015). History tended to be one-sided nation he wanted to tell and such shaped because they tended to represent one the movie’s content through an perspective and it is uncomplex because understanding of outsider of the such interpretation presumed all history Troubles. In a time when a great effort to as clear and certain as fact of the event censor contents related to the Troubles, in a linearly told. In other words, Elephant becomes the most distinctive historical approach represses for any storytelling and is significant for the other interpretation beyond that. For audience. Elephant opens up with an instance, it is difficult to contribute the infamous sentence referring the trouble victim’s perspective in interpreting the as an elephant which no one seemed history of Hiroshima of the novel. He also addressed this. Then, the movie elaborates three characteristics of proceeds to display 16 murders which historical analysis; (1) any historical audience could impossibly recognize analysis cannot be objective in which the who killed and who was the victim. result influenced inevitably by the Besides, the context of the perpetrator authors upbringing and view, (2) a and the victim is none intentionally. particular historical analysis cannot Nevertheless, the movie consistently represent generally of the era, and (3) displays the murder in a certain and history, similarly with real life, is not exact manner with different face of linear or even progressive. New shooters. Historicism recognizes the complexity In revealing the historical and/or nature of the history and it treats literary cultural aspects of Elephant, researchers work and history the same as they share could apply new historicism, but not insights to each other. historical approach. Taine (1987), a There are recent studies which French critic, theorized this traditional implement New Historicism theory. First, approach in which historical-biographical Taufiqurrohman (2019) applies New

104 | P a g e

Historicism to unpack the image of New Historicism considers the communist and position it horizontally to socio-economic aspects of the literary the Post-Suharto 1965 narratives such as works by positioning secondary sources Penjagal Itu Telah Mati. Second, as co-text with the primary sources. Such Wicaksono (2018) applies New does not appear in historical approach Historicism to interpret the social and which treats the secondary approach as political reality of Indonesia within the evidence and cannot be treated Larasati novel. Third, Zulaemy and critically as done in the literary works. Andalas (2020) applies New Historicism Therefore, it can be said that New to illustrate the historical dimension of Historicism is an intertextual analysis by Penari dari Serdang novel and how it positioning primary and secondary affected in the creation of the novel. sources horizontally (barry). Finally, the research elaborates the New Historicism is actually an problems, the objectives and the insufficiently theorized because in the significant of this initiation. The research first place, it was just an interpretation identified a problem in Elephant short practice. However, later, many critics movie; the absence of context and the and researcher demand in theorizing the landscape repeated murder. The practice for the result of viewing better question would concern on how the of history. Then, Greenblatt published history shaped such presentation. the Practicing New Historicism. There are Accordingly, the research possesses five concept keys of New Historicism; (1) objectives to explain the absence of History is about an interpretation, not context in the movie by reading the facts, and therefore, secondary sources history with New Historicism. As a result, can be analyzed similarly with literary the analysis could provide a reference works, (2) history should not be seen as and explanation in interpreting Elephant linear and progressive narrative, (3) and the Troubles. history is constructed by the power through exchanging goods, human 2. LITERATURE REVIEW beings, and ideas, (4) Historical analysis New historicism provides the inevitably only focuses on particular alternative lens to look at history the discourse, and (5) personal identity is the way as it should. It does not question the result of the culture and so otherwise. accuracy based only the author’s life and how it was in the past generally. Based 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY on the practice of Greenblatt, in which The research conducts a New Historicism was theorized, New descriptive qualitative which accord to Historicism views history as the the research object and theoretical interactive relation between the literary approach. It accords to the research works and the culture of the era (Tyson, object, which is movie, because the 2015). It means that the literary works method provides a tool for describing produced how the reader view the the events portrayed within ‘Elephant’ culture. Moreover, the culture also movie. Moreover, descriptive qualitative produced the view perceived in the method obliterates the obstruction of literary work. This interactive relation is the movie possessing no plot, and no the interesting part of viewing the conversation by describing the events history. meticulously. Since the theoretical

105 | P a g e

approach is new historicism which would be prisoned. Especially, there was furthers the attempt of in-depth a persistent and continuous attempt to interpretation of the literary work, doctrine through broadcasting Margaret descriptive qualitative is the appropriate Thatcher’s concern of Political Violence endeavor to analyze primary and of Northern Ireland. The speech was secondary sources in a narrative broadcasted as a doctrine to hold culmination. In sum, the researcher uses everybody in their place. The speech told descriptive qualitative method to the indifference between crime violence describe the events within the movie, and violence to make the political and the description is analyzed and statement was heard by the above. Such presented in narrative analysis. took accountability of anyone who In collecting the data, the wanted to try to deviate the union of researcher adopts the non-participative Ireland and British. observation. In analyzing the data, the “The elephant in our living room” researcher adopts Creswell (2018) means that The Trouble was the technique according to the necessities of talk of everywhere. They could not the research. There are five keys of avoid of the fact that this terrible analysis; (1) the researcher organizes and event occurred and Ireland was in prepares the collected data sources to deterioration while British be analyzed. (2) the researcher positions Government cleaned their hands. the collected data sources in comparison “The elephant in our living room” to question and reflect and seek the correlates with a journal that interactive relation between the sources, analyze how four newspaper then, (3) the researcher codes or marks perceived The Troubles. It provides every relation found in the data sources an insight of the era that media (4) and generates every relation found had failed and avoid the based on themes. Lastly, (5) the terribleness of the violence and researcher re-analyzes and elaborates how it effected many sections of more of the previous findings based on Ireland. the theme it is marked. 4. 2. The Reality of Sectarian Violence After the opening statements 4. DISCUSSION which portrayed the situation simply of 4. 1. The Troubles as the ‘Elephant’ The Troubles, the movie proceeds with The movie opens the minute with a 18 sections of killings. Each section is statement that provides the only context similar in terms of the chronological referring to the era of the time. events. It begins with the wide shot “For some of us, ‘The Troubles’ is camera follows the murderer in his steps the elephant in our living room.” before killing the target and the camera (Clarke, 1989: 00:03) stagnantly provides 20 seconds of the ‘The elephant in our living room’ is victim lying in their blood. There is no a common catchphrase referring to the dialogue, no further context, and no ignored overt issue and the phrase characterization, but just a crude and provides an insight of how The Troubles cold look of the killing in The Trouble. was perceived by the journalistic media. The Trouble, as David (2012) Many newspapers of the time avoid described in his book of Making Sense of discussing of The Troubles because they the Troubles, sparked a sectarian

106 | P a g e

violence between the Protestants Many of the stories in that time were left (Northern Ireland) and Catholics inconclusive or unresolved. The book (southern Ireland). However, Elephant attempted to resolve and found that produced a different narrative than that. many of the victim too were the Elephant challenged the idea that the incorrect target of the murder. These effect of sectarian violence had never victims were an ordinary civilian who been between the two clearly because lived as usual. the murderer and the victim of the killing was never be perceived clearly who 5. CONCLUSION killed who. The movie blatantly provides New Historicism reveals the a landscape where none of the murderer atrocities of The Troubles. It reveals how or the victim can be determined whether the reality of Sectarian Violence was they are Protestants or Catholics. perceived and Elephant challenged the 4. 3. The Absence of Higher Power idea of providing a blatant and truthful The movie does not provide the landscape of the Troubles. The events background information neither of the only effected terrible in anywhere. It did murderer and of the victim. Most not recognize the religion stance of the interestingly, there is absence of the murderer or the victim. This event was people who were actually in conflict; the actually conflicted within the board but people of IRA, UDA, and British included the member to do the senseless Governments. Elephant produced this killings. Elephant provides a lens of how narrative is very much affected by the IRA, UDA, and British Governments’ fact that newspaper never shaped the absence in the movie as the one who man in suit who involved in the conflict should responsible of the movie. as the one who should be taking the responsible. Many of the reports of the REFERENCES killing was perpetrated by the member, Clarke, A. (1989). Elephant. BBC not the people on the board. Therefore, Northern Ireland. Elephants portrayed the senseless killing Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). as a reflection that does not recognize Research Design Qualitative, the people who killed, but also the Quantitative, and Mixed Methods people on the three organization who Approaches (Fifth Edit). SAGE were actually in conflict. Publications, Inc. 4. 4. Unrecognizable Shooters And Henra, D., & Jusmaya, A. (2019). Victims HIROSHIMA CITY CONDITION The 20 seconds of victim portrayal BEFORE AND AFTER BOMBED BY provides a reflection to the effect of UNITED STATE AS DEPICTED IN political violence in The Trouble. It draws JOHN HERSEY’S “HIROSHIMA” : how the devastating event only resulted HISTORICAL APPROACH. Scientia many victims which could not differ Journal, 1(1). whether the target was correct or not. In McKittrick, D. (2012). Making Sense of Lost Lives book which contains the Troubles: A History of the journalistic stories of the victim Northern Ireland Conflict. Penguin. (McKittrick et al., 2004), provides an McKittrick, D., Kelters, S., Feeney, B., & insight of how the victim stories was in a Thornton, C. (2004). Lost Lives: The terrible handle of Ireland government. Stories of the Men, Women and

107 | P a g e

Children Who Died as a Result of the User-friendly Guide (Third Edit). Northern Ireland Troubles: The Routledge. Stories of the Men, Women and Wicaksono, A. (2018). SEJARAH POLITIK Children Who Died Through the INDONESIA DALAM NOVEL Northern Ireland Troubles (Second LARASATI KARYA PRAMOEDYA Edi). Mainsteam Publishing. ANANTA TOER. Jentera: Jurnal Taine, H. A. (1987). History of English Kajian Sastra, 7(1), 20–35. Literature. Holt & Williams. Zulaemy, M., & Andalas, E. F. (2020). Taufiqurrohman, M. (2019). Challenging Peradaban Melayu Kuno: Sejarah, the New Order’s Communist Budaya, dan Ekonomi Serdang Figures: A New Historicism Study on dalam Novel Penari Dari Serdang Penjagal Itu Telah Mati. Humaniora, Karya Yudhistira ANM Massardi. 31(3), 293–301. Satwika : Kajian Ilmu Budaya Dan Tyson, L. (2015). Critical Theory Today: A Perubahan Sosial, 4(1), 71–83.

108 | P a g e