DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 14 – Cultural Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 14 – Cultural Heritage Chapter 14 – Cultural Heritage 14 Cultural Heritage 14.1 Introduction The potential impacts and mitigation measures of the McArthur River Mine Phase 3 Development Project (the Project) relating to cultural heritage issues are discussed in this chapter. The Gudanji, Binbinga and Yanyula. people traditionally used the lands that the Project is located on. Aboriginal groups, including the Garawa, Mara and Alawa people, are also represented in Borroloola and its surrounding area. As members of the local community, these groups have historically been consulted about the McArthur River Mine (MRM) despite not being Traditional Owners of lands that are likely to be directly impacted by the Project. During the development of the existing operation, a number of Aboriginal site investigation studies have been undertaken and agreements made with the Traditional Owners. Additional site investigations have also been undertaken for the Project’s new footprint areas that are likely to be affected. 14.2 Legislative Framework 14.2.1 Commonwealth legislation Heritage sites are protected under the Commonwealth Government’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and the Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment Act (No 1) 2003. The legislation places constraints on archaeological and historic sites. The National Heritage List and the Register of the National Estate provide lists of heritage sites protected under this legislation. The Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1976 (ALRA) is the Commonwealth legislation under which the Northern Territory Government makes laws to ensure the protection of Aboriginal sacred sites. 14.2.2 Northern Territory legislation The Northern Territory Heritage Conservation Act 2000 places legal constraints on the owners of private property, local government and the Crown. Declared heritage places and objects are listed in the Northern Territory Heritage Register and are protected under the Act. Prescribed archaeological places that may, or may not be declared are also protected under the Act. It is an offence to damage, destroy carry out work on, or alter a declared or prescribed site without the written consent of the Heritage Minister or the Minister’s Delegate. The Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act 1989 is designed to protect Aboriginal sacred sites in the Northern Territory in accordance with the previously mentioned ALRA Commonwealth legislation. It is administered by the Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority (AAPA). 14.2.3 The Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority The AAPA is a statutory authority of the Northern Territory Government, established under the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act 1989 in accordance with the Commonwealth ALRA. The ALRA defines a sacred site as ‘a site that is sacred to Aboriginals, or is otherwise of significance to Aboriginals according to Aboriginal tradition’. Under the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act 1989, the AAPA (AAPA, 2002) is required to: • receive requests for site protection from Aboriginal people • document the information provided in support of such requests • enter the documentation in a register • execute protection measures for all sacred sites. McArthur River Mine Phase 3 Development Project 14-1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 14 – Cultural Heritage The AAPA is responsible for assessing development projects undertaken within the Northern Territory: • assessing the potential impact • issuing ‘clearance certificates’. An Authority Certificate is required under the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act 1989, for any work proposed to be undertaken on land in the Northern Territory. The AAPA issues an Authority Certificate when it is satisfied that work can be undertaken without a high risk of damage to a sacred site, or when an agreement has been reached between Aboriginal custodians of any affected sites. For the existing McArthur River Mine operations, the AAPA has issued a number of Certificates. 14.3 Existing measures to protect Aboriginal cultural heritage The Project is located in an area of importance to Aboriginal people. MRM’s Community Relations and Environment team maintains a strong and positive working relationship with local Indigenous people and groups, that allow matters of Aboriginal cultural heritage to be addressed where mine related operations have the potential to disturb areas of high cultural value. In co-operation with Traditional Owners and Indigenous groups, MRM’s mine planning includes archaeological and ethnographic surveys. These surveys seek to preserve important cultural sites and to aid development of agreed salvage plans when disturbance is unavoidable. MRM includes a cultural heritage awareness component in its site induction for new employees and contractors that includes discussion regarding local cultural heritage issues and a related video. This program will be continued for all Project phases. The AAPA clearances discussed in Section 14.7.2 state what site avoidance measures need to be undertaken during the Project’s construction and operational activities. 14.4 Heritage Register Searches An online search of the Australian Heritage Database was undertaken for the place name of McArthur River and Bing Bong. The database search includes a number of Heritage listings and returns registered sites as well as locations under consideration to be added to any of the listings. The heritage listings included in the database are: • World Heritage List • National Heritage List • Commonwealth Heritage list • Register of the National Estate. 14.4.1 McArthur River search The McArthur River search returned three listings and a number of Indigenous places. All of the listings found were in the Register of the National Estate and are provided in Table 14-1. For legal status definitions, refer to Table 14-2. 14.4.1.1 Sir Edward Pellew Group and Surrounds, Borroloola, NT. The Sir Edward Pellew Group of islands and surrounding marine ecosystem, located 40 km to the north-east of Borroloola is comprised of island formations, seabeds, and coastal waters. In contrast to the mainland, the natural integrity of the area makes it an important reference point and benchmark for scientific research, due to limited human disturbance on the islands from activities such as pastoral pursuits. It is also an important habitat for a number of endangered species and species of biogeographic significance. A number of sites with Indigenous Values of National Estate significance are registered separately. McArthur River Mine Phase 3 Development Project 14-2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 14 – Cultural Heritage Table 14-1 Results for Australian Heritage Database search for McArthur River. Place Place ID Heritage List Classification Legal Status Sir Edward Pellew Group and 16109 Register of the Natural Registered Surrounds, Borroloola, NT. National Estate Abner Range, Carpentaria Hwy, 18243 Register of the Natural Indicative Place Borroloola, NT. National Estate Caranbirini Waterhole Area, 19016 Register of the Natural Indicative Place Carpentaria Hwy, Borroloola, NT National Estate 3 x Indigenous Places 127, 130 & Register of the Indigenous Registered 133 National Estate 2 x Indigenous Places 128 & 131 Register of the Indigenous Removed from the National Estate Register or IL Table 14-2 Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPAC) definitions of legal status for the Register of National Estate Legal Status Definition Registered The place is in the Register of the National Estate. Although some places may be legally registered because they are within a larger registered area, they may not necessarily possess intrinsic significance. Indicative Place Data provided to, or obtained by, the Australian Heritage Council or the former Australian Heritage Commission, has been entered into the database and the place is at some stage in the assessment process. A decision on whether the place should be entered in the Register has not been made. Interim List IL The place was in the Interim List at 1 January 2004 when the Australian Heritage Commission was abolished. The place had been publicly proposed for entry in the Register. Removed from The place has been removed from the Register. the Register (Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities 2010) 14.4.1.2 Abner Range, Carpentaria Hwy, Borroloola, NT. Abner Range covers 70,000 ha and is located approximately 40 km from the Project, partly bordering the eastern bank of the McArthur River. It is an ovaloid plateau, approximately 40km by 20 km that rises above the plains of the McArthur River system. Abner Range is considered one of the most extensive and spectacular developments of these formations in Australia and a geomorphological feature of international significance. Abner Range supports vegetation types of biogeographic importance that have high aesthetic values, particularly at protected springs and soaks at the bases of cliffs. The Register of the National Estate and AAPA lists many sites in the area based on evidence of Aboriginal occupation. 14.4.1.3 Caranbirini Waterhole Area, Carpentaria Hwy, Borroloola, NT Caranbirini Waterhole has an area of about 314 ha located 33 km south-west of Borroloola. Significance of the Waterhole is linked to the occurrence of a rare plant and a few rare and restricted fauna species in the area. The small waterhole has been formed where Caranbirini Creek cuts through a strike range of Roper Group sandstone. McArthur
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mcarthur Basin Geology and Mineral Resources of the Northern Territory
    Geology and mineral resources of the Northern Territory Ahmad M and Munson TJ (compilers) Northern Territory Geological Survey Special Publication 5 Chapter 15: McArthur Basin BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Ahmad M, Dunster JN and Munson TJ, 2013. Chapter 15: McArthur Basin: in Ahmad M and Munson TJ (compilers). ‘Geology and mineral resources of the Northern Territory’. Northern Territory Geological Survey, Special Publication 5. Disclaimer While all care has been taken to ensure that information contained in this publication is true and correct at the time of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of its information. The Northern Territory of Australia gives no warranty or assurance, and makes no representation as to the accuracy of any information or advice contained in this publication, or that it is suitable for your intended use. You should not rely upon information in this publication for the purpose of making any serious business or investment decisions without obtaining independent and/or professional advice in relation to your particular situation. The Northern Territory of Australia disclaims any liability or responsibility or duty of care towards any person for loss or damage caused by any use of, or reliance on the information contained in this publication. McArthur Basin Current as of Dec 2010 Chapter 15: McARTHUR BASIN M Ahmad, JN Dunster and TJ Munson INTRODUCTION The basin has been modelled as several north-trending asymmetric rifts or grabens separated by northwest- The Palaeo- to Mesoproterozoic McArthur Basin is exposed trending faults and transverse ridges. Previous workers over an area of about 180 000 km2 in the northeastern NT.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Values and Resource Use in the Limmen Bight
    NATURAL VALUES AND RESOURCE USE IN THE LIMMEN BIGHT REGION © Australian Marine Conservation Society, January 2019 Australian Marine Conservation Society Phone: +61 (07) 3846 6777 Freecall: 1800 066 299 Email: [email protected] PO Box 5815 West End QLD 4101 Keep Top End Coasts Healthy Alliance Keep Top End Coasts Healthy is an alliance of environment groups including the Australian Marine Conservation Society, the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Environment Centre of the Northern Territory. Authors: Chris Smyth and Joel Turner, Centre for Conservation Geography Printing: Printed on 100% recycled paper by IMAGE OFFSET, Darwin. Maps: Centre for Conservation Geography This report is an independent research paper prepared by the Centre for Conservation Geography commissioned by, and for the exclusive use of, the Keep Top End Coasts Healthy (KTECH) alliance. The report must only be used by KTECH, or with the explicit permission of KTECH. The matters covered in the report are those agreed to between KTECH and the authors. The report does not purport to consider exhaustively all values of the Limmen Bight region. The authors do not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation, compensatory, direct, indirect, or consequential damages and claims of third parties that may be caused directly or indirectly through the use of, reliance upon or interpretation of the contents of the report. Cover photos: Main - Limmen River. Photo: David Hancock Inset (L-R): Green Turtle, Recreational fishing is an important leisure activity in
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Outside September 2008 Issue 1
    InsideOutside September 2008 Issue 1 DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING Message from the General Manager iona Chamberlain accepts it is a turbulent Fiona says what is time in the Territory with so many changes different is that the Ftaking place in remote housing. Australian Government and the Northern Territory But the General Manager of Territory Housing also Government are now sees this as an era when solid relationships can aligned on what needs be created and cemented to deliver better housing to happen to improve the to Indigenous communities, along with new jobs, lives of Indigenous people healthier kids and better services. in remote communities. Fiona Chamberlain “The Northern Territory Government had already “Both Governments are committed to committed to making quite a substantial “ serious change in change in remote the way they deliver areas through Everyone has to roll services in the bush,” the Closing the Fiona says. “We have Gap policy,” their sleeves up and put identified over the past Fiona says. “ 20 months that we “Every agency need a new, innovative is working on a their skin in the game. approach to the way we financial program deliver public housing.” that relates to a remote community. We are not working on this Continued page 2 alone”. In this issue . Virtual tool kit Message from the General Manager ................................. 1 Virtual tool kit ..................................................................... 1 “virtual tool kit” for staff, a radio Current arrangements with Shire Councils ........................ 2 advertisement and a poster are a few Working in partnership ....................................................... 3 of the projects the Remote Housing Remote housing business systems ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 14 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cultural Heritage
    McArthur River Mine Open Cut Project Section 14 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cultural Heritage 1 Cultural Heritage 14.0 Cultural Heritage 14.1 Introduction The MRM project is on lands that were traditionally used by the Gudanji, Binbinga and Yanyula people. Borroloola and its immediate surrounds have residents from a number of Aboriginal groups and include the Garawa, Mara and Alawa people. Not all of these groups are traditional owners of lands likely to be directly affected through the open cut development, but they have historically been consulted about the mine as members of the local community. In recent years a number of Aboriginal site investigation studies have been undertaken and agreements have been made with the traditional owners for the current mining lease approvals. In addition, site investigations have also been undertaken for the areas to be affected by the open cut project. 14.2 Measures to Protect Aboriginal Heritage The region in which the mine is located has long been, and continues to be, an area of importance to Aboriginal people. While many Aboriginal people still live in the general region of the mine, no-one lives in the immediate vicinity of the mine. MRM maintains a neighbourly relationship with Aboriginal communities in the area. MRM’s Community Relations Department staff have built up a solid working relationship with local Aboriginal people over the years. This has enabled positive interactions to take place on matters of Aboriginal cultural heritage in cases where the mine’s activities may come into contact with areas of significance to local people. As part of its mine planning, MRM undertakes archaeological and ethnographic surveys of all land it may wish to disturb.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Men of High Degree Studiesin Sodetyand Culture
    ])U Md�r I W H1// <43 H1�hi Jew Jn• Terrace c; T LUCIA. .Id 4007 �MY.Ers- Drysdale R. 0-v Cape 1 <0 �11 King Edward R Eylandt J (P le { York Prin N.Kimb �0 cess Ch arlotte Bay JJ J J Peninsula Kalumbur,:u -{.__ Wal.cott • C ooktown Inlet 1r Dampier's Lan by Broome S.W.Kimberley E. Kimberley Hooker Ck. La Grange Great Sandy Desert NORTHERN TERRITORY Port Hedland • Yuendumu , Papanya 0ga Boulia ,r>- Haasts Bluff • ,_e':lo . Alice Springs IY, Woorabin Gibson Oesert Hermannsburg• da, �igalong pe ter I QU tn"' "'= EENSLAND 1v1"' nn ''� • Ayre's Rock nn " "' r ---- ----------------------------L- T omk i nson Ra. Musgrave Ra. Everard Ra Warburton Ra. WESTERN AUSTRALIA Fraser Is. Oodnadatta · Laverton SOUTH AUSTRALIA Victoria Desert New Norcia !) Perth N EW SOUT H WALES Great Australian Bight Port �ackson �f.jer l. W. llill (lr14), t:D, 1.\ Censultlf . nt 1\n·hlk.. l �st Tl·l: ( 117} .171-'l.lS Aboriginal Men of High Degree Studiesin Sodetyand Culture General Editors: Jeremy Beckett and Grant Harman Previous titles in series From Past4 to Pt�vlova: A Comp��rlltivt Study ofIlllli1111 Smlm m Sydney & Griffith by Rina Huber Aboriginal Men of High Degree SECOND EDITION A. P. Elkin THEUNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLANDLffiRARY SOCIALSCIENCES AND HUMANITIES LIBRARY University of Queensland Press First edition 1945 Second edition © University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, Queensland, 1977 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no p�rt may be reproduced by any process without written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Australian Indigenous Histories
    Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah (editors) Published by ANU E Press and Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Monograph 16 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Transgressions [electronic resource] : critical Australian Indigenous histories / editors, Ingereth Macfarlane ; Mark Hannah. Publisher: Acton, A.C.T. : ANU E Press, 2007. ISBN: 9781921313448 (pbk.) 9781921313431 (online) Series: Aboriginal history monograph Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Indigenous peoples–Australia–History. Aboriginal Australians, Treatment of–History. Colonies in literature. Australia–Colonization–History. Australia–Historiography. Other Authors: Macfarlane, Ingereth. Hannah, Mark. Dewey Number: 994 Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Treasurer/Public Officer), Ingereth Macfarlane (Secretary/ Managing Editor), Richard Baker, Gordon Briscoe, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Christine Hansen, Luise Hercus, David Johnston, Steven Kinnane, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Ann McGrath, Frances Peters- Little, Kaye Price, Deborah Bird Rose, Peter Radoll, Tiffany Shellam Editors Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah Copy Editors Geoff Hunt and Bernadette Hince Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to Aboriginal History, Box 2837 GPO Canberra, 2601, Australia. Sales and orders for journals and monographs, and journal subscriptions: T Boekel, email: [email protected], tel or fax: +61 2 6230 7054 www.aboriginalhistory.org ANU E Press All correspondence should be addressed to: ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected], http://epress.anu.edu.au Aboriginal History Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Colour and Power Among the Waanyi of Northwest Queensland
    Rainbow colour and power among the Waanyi of Northwest Queensland Author Tacon, Paul SC Published 2008 Journal Title Cambridge Archaeological Journal DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000231 Copyright Statement © 2008 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/23005 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Rainbow Colour and Power among the Waanyi of Northwest Queensland Rainbow Colour and Power among the Waanyi of Northwest Queensland Paul S.C. Taçon In 2002, an investigation into the rock art of Waanyi country was undertaken in conjunc- tion with ongoing archaeological excavation. Various subjects, styles and techniques were documented, associated oral history from Waanyi elders was recorded and the relation- ship to archaeological deposits was assessed. A large number of rainbow-like designs, in red or red-and-yellow, were recorded, along with a magnificent and very large red-and- yellow Rainbow Serpent. These and other images are discussed in relation to the travels of Ancestral Beings, stories and uses of coloured pigment and the use of local stone for both tools and the situating of important spiritual sites. Links to a network of other communities across northern and central Australia are highlighted. It is concluded that colour played a fundamental role in both expressing and maintaining relationships to places, Ancestral Beings and other groups of people. Important local differences can be seen in comparison to the ways in which colour has been used by Aboriginal people elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Mcarthur River Diversion 4.1 Purpose 4.2 Summary
    McArthur River Mine Section 4 Modified Open Cut Project Public Environmental Report McArthur River Diversion 4 McArthur Ri ver Di version 4.0 McArthur River Diversion 4.1 Purpose As discussed in earlier sections of this report, the design of the McArthur River diversion has been modified since the preparation of the Draft EIS (URS, 2005a) to reflect optimisations in the proposed Open Cut Project and to incorporate recommendations that were provided as part of the EIS review. The purpose of this section is to address the requirements of the PER guidelines with respect to the McArthur River diversion. Specifically it includes: x An updated assessment of the geomorphology of the McArthur River following a recent site survey of critical reaches and the incorporation of the results of visual assessments of the channel geometry in the revised design of the diversion channel (Section 4.3) x Characterisation of the existing aquatic habitats along the reach of the McArthur River that is to be diverted based on the results of a recent survey (Section 4.4) x The results from a more detailed calibration of the hydraulic model of the existing river to the January 2003 flood event. (Sections 4.5.2 and 4.5.3) x Review of roughness coefficients used in the hydraulic modelling. (Sections 4.5.4 and 4.5.5) x A sensitivity analysis of the ground terrain survey accuracy on the results of the hydraulic modelling (Section 4.5.6) x Re-modelling of the existing McArthur River. (4.5.7) x Modifications to the design of the proposed diversion channel and the methodology used to refine the design with the hydraulic model.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL and FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT EL25397 CALVERT PROJECT for PERIOD ENDING: 02 February 2015 Titleholder: Carpentaria Minerals
    ANNUAL and FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT EL25397 CALVERT PROJECT FOR PERIOD ENDING: 02 February 2015 Robinson River SE 53-4 1:250,000 Robinson 6365 1:100,000 Calvert River 6465 1:100,000 Selby 6464 1:100,000 Titleholder: Carpentaria Minerals Pty Ltd (100% owned subsidiary of Spectrum Rare Earths Limited) Prepared for Carpentaria Minerals Pty Ltd By Laura Petrella March 2015 CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1 2 LOCATION AND ACCESS ................................................................................ 2 3 TENEMENT STATUS AND OWNERSHIP ......................................................... 2 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 4 4 EXPLORATION DURING 2007 ......................................................................... 6 5 EXPLORATION DURING 2008 ......................................................................... 8 6.1 Airborne Hyper Spectral Remote Sensing Survey ............................................ 8 6.2 Geochemical Sampling ................................................................................... 10 6.3 Ground Magnetics .......................................................................................... 15 6 EXPLORATION DURING 2009 ....................................................................... 18 7 EXPLORATION DURING 2010 ....................................................................... 18 7.1 Geological
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Sociohistorical Context
    2 Sociohistorical context 2.1 Introduction This chapter presents sociohistorical data from the Roper River region from the 1840s to the 1960s. The aim of this chapter is to determine when and how a creole language evolved in the Roper River region and what role the pastoral industry may have played. Chapter 2 expands on Harris (1986), which is to date the most comprehensive sociohistorical study of pidgin and creole emergence in the Northern Territory. This work complemented Sandefur (1986) and provided background to other studies such as Munro (2000). Harris (1986) uses sociohistorical data from the 1840s-1900s from the early settlements in the vicinity of present day Darwin and the coastal regions in contact with the Macassans to describe the development and stabilisation of Northern Territory Pidgin (NT Pidgin) by the 1900s. Harris (1986) also describes the cattle industry invasion, as well as the establishment of the Roper River Mission (RRM), which led to the suggestion that abrupt creole genesis occurred in the RRM from 1908. The information in this chapter will contribute to the application of the Transfer Constraints approach to substrate transfer in Kriol in three ways. Firstly, it will provide evidence of which substrate languages had most potential for input in the process of transfer to the NT Pidgin, and ultimately then Kriol. Secondly, the sociohistorical data should suggest how much access to English, as the superstrate language, the substrate language speakers had. And finally, the description of each phase will allow for accurate identification of the timeframes within which transfer and levelling (as discussed in chapter 1) occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Watch Areas Arnhem Coastal Rivers Northern Territory River Basin No
    Flood Watch Areas Arnhem Coastal Rivers Northern Territory River Basin No. Blyth River 15 Buckingham River 17 East Alligator River 12 Goomadeer River 13 A r a f u r a S e a Goyder River 16 North West Coastal Rivers Liverpool River 14 T i m o r S e a River Basin No. Adelaide River 4 below Adelaide River Town Arnhem Croker Coastal Daly River above Douglas River 10 Melville Island Rivers Finniss River 2 Island Marchinbar Katherine River 11 Milikapiti ! Island Lower Daly River 9 1 Elcho ! Carpentaria Coastal Rivers Mary River 5 1 Island Bathurst Nguiu Maningrida Galiwinku River Basin No. Island 12 ! ! Moyle River 8 ! Nhulunbuy 13 Milingimbi ! Yirrkala ! Calvert River 31 South Alligator River 7 DARWIN ! ! Howard " Oenpelli Ramingining Groote Eylandt 23 Tiwi Islands 1 2 Island 17 North West 6 ! 14 Koolatong River 21 Jabiru Upper Adelaide River 3 Coastal 15 Batchelor 4 Limmen Bight River 27 Wildman River 6 Rivers ! 16 7 21 McArthur River 29 3 5 ! Bickerton Robinson River 30 Island Daly River ! Groote Roper River 25 ! ! Bonaparte Coastal Rivers Bonaparte 22 Alyangula Eylandt Rosie River 28 Pine 11 ! 9 Creek Angurugu River Basin No. Coastal 8 Towns River 26 ! ! Kalumburu Rivers Numbulwar Fitzmaurice River 18 ! Walker River 22 Katherine 25 Upper Victoria River 20 24 Ngukurr 23 Waterhouse River 24 18 ! Victoria River below Kalkarindji 19 10 Carpentaria G u l f 26 Coastal Rivers ! o f ! Wyndham Vanderlin C a r p e n t a r i a ! 28 Kununurra West Island Island 27 ! Borroloola 41 Mount 19 Barnett Mornington ! ! Dunmarra Island Warmun 30 (Turkey 32 Creek) ! 29 Bentinck 39 Island Kalkarindji 31 ! Elliott ! ! Karumba ! 20 ! Normanton Doomadgee Burketown Fitzroy ! Crossing Renner ! Halls Creek ! Springs ! ! Lajamanu 41 Larrawa ! Warrego Barkly ! 40 33 Homestead QLD ! Roadhouse Tennant ! Balgo Creek WA ! Hill Camooweal ! 34 Mount Isa Cloncurry ! ! ! Flood Watch Area No.
    [Show full text]
  • ED317024.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 317 024 FL 017 507 AUTHOR &Ay, M. J., Ed. TITLE Aboriginal Language Use in the Northern Territory: 5 Reports. Work Papers of SIL-AAIB, Series B, Volume 13. INSTITUTION Summer Inst. of Linguistics, Darwin (Australia). Australian Aborigines Branch. REPORT NO ISBN-0-86892-331-1 PUB DATE May 88 NOTE 111p. PUB TYPE Reports - Reearch/Technical (143) -- Collected Works - Serials (022) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Australian Aboriginal Languages; Creoles; Diachronic Linguistics; Foreign Countries; *Indigenous Populations; Language Maintenance; Language Research; Social Influences; Sociolinguistics; Uncommonly Taught Languages IDENTIFIERS *Australia (Northern Territory); Kriol; Tiwi; Yanyuwa ABSTRACT Five studies of aboriginal language use in Australia's Northern Territory include: (1) "Yanyuwa--A Dying Language" (Jean F. Kirton), which outlines the factors contributing to the demise of the use of Yar.yuwa since 1963 and the trend toward use of Kriol; (2) "Kriol in the Barkly Tableland" (Phillip L. Grater), presenting sociolinguistic and linguistic observations about the language use of aboriginal people in eight Kriol-speaking communities;(3) "Sociolinguistic Survey Report: Daly River Region Languages" (S. James Elliu), discussing sociological conditions of each Daly River area language; (4) "Sociolinguistic Survey Report; Wagalt Region Languages" (S. James Ellis), describing the population centers, sociological conditions of vernacular languages and the Belyuen Creole, and language attitudes in that area; and (5) "Tiwi: A Language Struggling to Survive" (Jenny Lee), chronicling Tiwi's history, Tiwi life today, the present language situaticil and the nature of change within it, and factors influencing the Language's survival or revival. (MSE) ********************r************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * from the original document.
    [Show full text]