Comprehensive Member Health Insurance Plans
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hexas Civil Liberties Reporter the Bi'monthly Publication of the Texas Civil Liberties Union
Hexas Civil Liberties Reporter The Bi'Monthly Publication of the Texas Civil Liberties Union SEPT./OCT. 1986 AUSTIN,TEXAS New Director Named TCLU Blasts Austin INS Raid For South Texas by Julia Fitzgerald It was 6:13 a.m. on June 6 when the Project INS men boarded the Austin city bus and asked Gerato Hernandez where he was A new director has been named for the from. Hernandez, who was bom in the South Texas Project as the Project's focus United States, refused to answer. But he has been expanded to deal with immigra looked at his watch to check the time. tion-related issues as well as traditional He was already planning to complain Project concerns involving the rights of about this blatant violation of his rights. farmworkers in the Rio Grande Valley. The INS agents made their way down The new director is Carter "Gappy" the aisle of the bus, stopping to interro White, an attorney who most recently X. gate each Hispanic male. Anyone who served as a law clerk to Texas Third Court answered in Spanish or could not provide of Appeals Judge Robert Gammage and documentation was led to a waiting INS as an aide to State Senator Gonzalo van. Barrientos. White began work in the San For over an hour at an intersection in Juan office of the Project on September the largely Hispanic neighborhood of East 1. INS Agent questions an East Austin Austin INS agents boarded buses and The South Texas Project, also known resident. See INS Raid, p. 6 as Oficina Legal del Pueblo Unido, was founded by the ACLU in the early 1970's Time To Return To Our Activist Roots to deal with the extraordinary plight of Valley migrant farmworkers. -
Presidential Files; Folder: 7/28/77 [2]; Container 34
7/28/77 [2] Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 7/28/77 [2]; Container 34 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES) FORM OF CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE DATE RESTRICTION DOCUMENT letter From President Carter to Sen. Inouye (5 pp.) 7/27/77 A w/att. Intelligence Oversight Board/ enclosed in Hutcheson to Frank Moore 7/28~~? r.l I I {)~ L 7 93 FILE LOCATION Carter Presidential Papers- Staff Of fcies, Off~£e of the Staff Sec.- Pres. Handwriting File 7/28777 [2] Box 41' RESTRICTION CODES (A) Closed by Executive Order 12356'governing access to national security information. B) Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document. C) Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. t-· 1\TIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. NA FORM 1429 (6-85) t ~ l-~~- ------------------------------~I . ( ~, 1. • I ' \ \ . • THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 28, 1977 ·I ! Frank Moore ( . I The attached was returned in the President's outbox. I . It is forwarded to you for appropriate handling. Rick Hutcheson cc: The Vice President Hamilton Jordan Bob Lipshutz Zbig Brzezinski • I Joe Dennin ! RE: LETTER TO SENATOR INOUYE ON INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT \ BOARD t ' . ·\ •I ' 1 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON FOR STAFFING FOR INFORMATION FROH PRESIDENT'S OUTBOX LOG IN TO PRESIDENT TODAY z IMMEDIATE TURNAROUND 0 I H ~ ~·'-'\ 8 H c.... C. (Ji u >t ,::X: ~ / MONDALE ENROLLED BILL COSTANZA AGENCY REPORT EIZENSTAT CAB DECISION I JORDAN EXECUTIVE ORDER I LIPSHUTZ Comments due to / MOORE of'"• ~ ,_. -
Michael L. Nieswiadomy Curriculum Vitae January 2019
Michael L. Nieswiadomy Curriculum Vitae January 2019 CURRICULUM VITAE Michael L. Nieswiadomy Address: Home Office: 2113 Pembrooke Place Denton, TX 76205-8209 (940) 382-5903; (940) 382-2315 fax email: [email protected] Present Positions: Professor of Economics, University of North Texas Immediate Past President, National Association of Forensic Economics, 2019-2021 Associate Editor, Journal of Legal Economics (Sept. 2011-present) Past Positions: Vice President, National Association of Forensic Economics (2012- 2015) President, National Association of Forensic Economics, 2017-2019 Past Editor, Journal of Legal Economics (Sept. 2008- Aug. 2011) I. Academic Data A. Education Ph.D., Economics, Texas A & M University, 1983. B.A., Economics, University of Dallas, 1979. First in Class. B. Areas of Expertise Econometrics Industrial Organization Labor Economics Natural Resource Economics C. Teaching Experience Professor, University of North Texas, 1997-present Associate Professor, University of North Texas, 1990-97 Assistant Professor, University of North Texas, 1985-90 1 Michael L. Nieswiadomy Curriculum Vitae January 2019 Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Arlington, 1983-1985 Graduate Teaching Assistant, Texas A&M University, 1980-83 II. Research and Professional Activity A. Refereed Publications 1. "The Demand for Irrigation Water in the High Plains of Texas: 1957-1980," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 67, No. 3, August 1985, pp. 619 - 626. 2. "A Technique for Comparing Elasticities of Linear Demand and Supply Curves," Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. XIII, No. 4, December 1985, pp. 68-70. 3. "A Note on Comparing the Elasticities of Demand Curves," Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, Spring, 1986, pp. 125 - 128. -
Why I Support Georgia Law…
7PM t*44/ Editor’s Note: The Advocate is published annually by the University of Georgia School of Law for alumni, friends and members of the law school community. Please contact the Office PG$PNNVOJDBUJPOTBOE1VCMJD3FMBUJPOTBUPS [email protected] if you have any comments or suggestions. Dean Rebecca Hanner White Associate Dean for Academic & Student Affairs Paul M. Kurtz Associate Dean for Faculty Development Dan T. Coenen Associate Dean for Administration Paul B. Rollins Director of Dean Rusk Center C. Donald Johnson (J.D.’73) Director of Law Library Carol A. Watson (J.D.’87) Senior Director of Law School Advancement Gregory C. “Greg” Sowell (J.D.’83) Director of Business & Finance Kathleen A. Day Sixth U.S. Director of Communications & Public Relations 13 Heidi M. Murphy Supreme Director of Diversity Programs & Associate Director of Law Admissions Gregory L. Roseboro (J.D.’87) Court clerk in Email departmental inquiries to: Admissions – [email protected] nine years Alumni Programs – [email protected] Communications – [email protected] Development – [email protected] Graduate Legal Studies – [email protected] Law Library – [email protected] Legal Career Services – [email protected] Registrar – [email protected] 2012–13 Board of Visitors Chair Kathelen V. Amos, Eleanor F. Resolving conflicts of law arising from Banister, Elizabeth B. Chandler, Laura Hauck Covington, Kenneth M. Henson Jr., P. Harris Hines, R. Dale Hughes, Kenneth Klein, TBNFTFYrelationships 4 Michael J. Sharp, Herbert J. Short Jr., Reginald R. Smith, William Associate Professor Hillel Levin explores how to address conflicts resulting from the J. Stembler, Audrey Boone Tillman and Joel O. Wooten Jr. -
Maintaining Judicial Independence in Drug Courts
Er!'Wyr "Iir & Maintaining Judicial Independence in Drug Courts 06-08GBJ_Cover.indd 1 5/22/2008 9:12:32 AM ( 3 3 44 ) 1 ? 4 1, 0 ( .3 ' 37 $ 1 0 [ 3A ! 37 $ 3@ 4 [ 4 ( 4 4 5 4 6 4 5 [ 3 4 5 0 - 1 A " 37 $ = 1 3A 0 1 3 B 4C : + D 1 1 E 0 0 [ 3 6 7 4 4 4 4 0 50 C : 4 0 5 $ [ 3 3 4 6 4 $3 0 $ 0 $ 4 7 E 3 J '&&K 5 5 5 5 5 7 5 @ 4 3 43 1 . $$ 43 1 . $ 4 @ 4 5 = 5 = 1 4 6 50 33 / . $$ 33 / . $ 4 33 )(, 1 50 @ @ 4 3= 43 6 /E (3 5 F G 9 3 3 4 (3 1 3 6 3 5 @ 7 @ ( 5 F 6 3 5 ( @ D 0 D 5 33 5 . $ 4 ;6 4 5 /7 . 5 3 /7 . < / 3 4 0 4 @ 7 ) 4 4 . \ 4 4 51, 4 9 I1 . $$ I1 . $ 4 $$ ) @ , 7 < . 33 . 4 1 43 . 4 6 4 . 8 /E 8 4 8= 3 . $$ 8= 3 . $ 4 0 ( 4 3 ( 4 6 3 14 / 3 @ 4 7 3 3 1 4 4 7 6 / $ 1 1 3 : 43 4 : ; 4 ( 3 5 $ 3 8= 5 )0 0 $ 1, ( 3 )< 76 4 , ( ( 3 ) 1, 8//9'!&+>"!&+ 0 1 $ [ 3 0 4 4 1 $ 1 4 5 ) $ 6 7 , 6 5 31 7 74 1 73 4 $ $ 8 8 9 33 3 1 # # !"!# # $ !%%&' # ( )*+", -!-.%%%! / '.***.+#+.'%-% 06-08GBJ_Cover.indd 2 5/22/2008 9:12:38 AM 06-08gbj.qxp 5/22/2008 12:40 PM Page 1 June 2008 Volume 13 Number 7 GBJ Legals 42 14 Law Day Rules 14 Maintaining Judicial in Glynn County! Independence in Drug Courts by Linda T. -
SPRING 2010 — PAGE 1 the REPORTER — SPRING 2010 — PAGE 2 TABLE of CONTENTS MESSAGE from Features the INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE: List of District Justices
THE REPORTER — SPRING 2010 — PAGE 1 THE REPORTER — SPRING 2010 — PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM Features THE INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE: List of District Justices .............................................4 As my time as International Justice winds down this biennium, I 2010 P.A.D. Day at the Supreme Court ............ 6–7 have been reflecting on the past two years. Many things, too numerous to Law Chapter News ........................................... 8–11 list here, have touched me but Pre-Law News .................................... 12–13, 15–16 perhaps none are more meaningful than actually experiencing how our Financial Advisor “Wordsalad” .............................. 17 pre-law, law and alumni members believe in our mission, purposes Alumni News .................................................. 18–22 and core values. You get it—and Law School Membership Application................... 23 that is exciting! We continue on a feverish pace Departments for initiations and while numbers give us raw data, that data really translates into what P.A.D. is all Clerk’s Corner...........................................................4 about. Through sustaining and growing your Chapters, you Law Ops Review.......................................................5 enable Service to the Student, the Law School, the Community and the Profession to be a reality. Programming continues F.A.Q.s of Pre-Law ................................................ 14 to be what sets us apart from other organizations. And now is the time to finalize preparations for your fall semester. AAC Attack! ........................................................... 18 Targeted recruiting opportunities abound whether you Campaign 100 ...................................................... 19 are a pre-law, law or alumni member. Participate in any orientation fair your school may hold. Conduct a social Online-Only Content ...................................... 24-33 event planned by your Chapter to meet and greet incoming students. -
The Perils of Guardian Ad Litem Appointments Move on up in the World
April 2020 Volume 25, Number 5 From the President: GEORGIA BAR In the Face of Difficulty, Hope Can Be Found Annual Bar Media & Judiciary Conference JOURNAL Exceeds Expectations Spring Into Action: October is Just Around the Corner Mindfulness Meditation to Combat Stress and Promote Civility in the Law THE LEGAL The Perils of Guardian ad Litem Appointments Move on up in the world. Join a State Bar Section. The State Bar of Georgia’s 52 sections provide newsletters, programs and the chance to exchange ideas with other practitioners. Section dues are very affordable, from $10-35. Join one (or more) today by visiting www.gabar.org > Our Programs > Sections. Questions? Contact Sections Director Mary Jo Sullivan at [email protected]. ADMINISTERED BY: DON’T ROLL THE DICE ... WHEN IT COMES TO A DISABILITY You can’t count on avoiding a disability, but you can help preserve your family’s way of life with Long-Term Disability Insurance. It is no secret that your ability to work is a key element to your financial well-being. In the unforeseen event that you become disabled, you’d want to have solid disability income protection. That’s why as a member of the State Bar of Georgia, you have access to a group plan with specially negotiated rates that can help meet your needs. UP TO $10,000 OWN SPECIAL OF MONTHLY OCCUPATION GROUP RATES DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR MEMBERS COVERAGE1 Get an instant online quote for Long-Term Disability Insurance at www.memberbenefits.com/gabar or call 1-800-282-8626 Products sold and serviced by the State Bar of Georgia’s recommended broker, Member Benefits. -
Under Age: Redefining Legal Adulthood in 1970S America
UNDER AGE: REDEFINING LEGAL ADULTHOOD IN 1970S AMERICA A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Timothy J. G. Cole May 2016 Examining Committee Members: Beth Bailey, Advisory Chair, Department of History, Temple University David Farber, Department of History, Temple University Bryant Simon, Department of History, Temple University Daniel Hart, External Member, Department of Psychology and Department of Childhood Studies, Rutgers University-Camden © Copyright 2015 by Timothy J. G. Cole All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Between the late 1960s and early 1980s, state and federal lawmakers made a number of unprecedented changes to the minimum age laws that define the legal boundaries between childhood and adulthood in the United States. By altering the voting age and the legal age of majority during the early 1970s, legislators effectively lowered the legal age of adulthood from twenty-one to eighteen, and launched a broader, more wide-ranging debate over other minimum age laws that would preoccupy legislators for much of the decade that followed. These reforms can be grouped into two distinct stages. Early 1970s reforms to the voting age and age of majority placed a great deal of faith in eighteen- to twenty-year-old Americans’ ability to make mature, responsible decisions for themselves, and marked a significant departure from the traditional practice of treating young people as legal adults at the age of twenty-one. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, however, a second set of reforms revoked much of the faith that legislators had placed in the nation’s young people, raising some key minimum age limits – such as the drinking age – and expanding adults’ ability to supervise and control teenaged youth. -
Trump Success? Conventional Measures in the Era of an Unconventional President
Trump Success? Conventional Measures in the Era of an Unconventional President Jon R. Bond Texas A&M University [email protected] and Manny Teodoro Texas A&M University [email protected] Prepared for Presentation at the 115th Annual Meeting & Exhibition of the American Political Science Association August 29 – September 1, 2019 Washington, DC Trump Success? Conventional Measures in the Era of an Unconventional President Abstract Conventional indicators reported in CQ’s 2017 Presidential Support Study show that President Trump racked up a “Record Success Rate”, winning 100 percent of House votes on which he expressed a position. Although presidency scholars have long recognized that winning roll call votes is not an indication of presidential influence, Trump’s unconventional style and his willful ignorance of Congress and basic details of the policies he “supports” lead us to question whether the results of roll call votes should even be interpreted as presidential success. Including this unconventional president in the study of a still small n of presidents requires innovative indicators that do not rely exclusively on traditional Presidential Support Scores that compare members on a static zero to 100 scale. Taking cues from FiveThirtyEight and from the field of sabermetrics, this paper presents two novel metrics that estimate whether House members’ support for the 11 elected presidents from Eisenhower to Trump is higher or lower than should be expected relative to differing political conditions. One metric, Support Above Expectations (SAE), estimates whether members’ presidential support is higher or lower than should be expected given electoral conditions, partisanship, polarization. This metric builds on 538’s “Trump plus-minus” score. -
A National Call to Action
A National Call to Action Access to Justice for Limited English Proficient Litigants: Creating Solutions to Language Barriers in State Courts July 2013 For further information contact: Konstantina Vagenas, Director/Chief Counsel Language and Access to Justice Initiatives National Center for State Courts 2425 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 350 Arlington, VA 22201-3326 [email protected] Additional Resources can be found at: www.ncsc.org Copyright 2013 National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Avenue Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147 ISBN 978-0-89656-287-5 This document has been prepared with support from a State Justice Institute grant. The points of view and opinions offered in this call to action are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policies or position of the State Justice Institute or the National Center for State Courts. Table of Contents Preface and Acknowledgments i Executive Summary ii Introduction iv Chapter 1: Pre-Summit Assessment 1 Chapter 2: The Summit 11 Plenary Sessions 12 Workshops 13 Team Exercises: Identifying Priorities and Developing Action Plans 16 Chapter 3: Action Steps: A Road Map to a Successful Language Access Program 17 Step 1: Identifying the Need for Language Assistance 19 Step 2: Establishing and Maintaining Oversight 22 Step 3: Implementing Monitoring Procedures 25 Step 4: Training and Educating Court Staff and Stakeholders 27 Step 5: Training and Certifying Interpreters 30 Step 6: Enhancing Collaboration and Information Sharing 33 Step 7: Utilizing Remote Interpreting Technology 35 Step 8: Ensuring Compliance with Legal Requirements 38 Step 9: Exploring Strategies to Obtain Funding 40 Appendix A: Summit Agenda 44 Appendix B: List of Summit Attendees/State Delegations 50 Preface and Acknowledgments Our American system of justice cannot function if it is not designed to adequately address the constitutional rights of a very large and ever-growing portion of its population, namely litigants with limited English proficiency (LEP). -
Právnická Fakulta Masarykovy Univerzity Právo a Právní Věda Katedra Ústavního Práva a Politologie
Právnická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity Právo a právní věda Katedra ústavního práva a politologie Diplomová práce Volby prezidenta Spojených států v roce 2012 Filip Marvan 2013/2014 „Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci na téma Volby prezidenta Spojených států v roce 2012 zpracoval samostatně. Veškeré prameny a zdroje informací, které jsem použil k sepsání této práce, byly citovány v poznámkách pod čarou a jsou uvedeny v seznamu použitých pramenů a literatury“. V Brně dne 30. 3. 2014 ……….………………… 1 Touto cestou velmi děkuji vedoucímu mé diplomové práce, doc. JUDr. Jiřímu Kroupovi, CSc. za odborné vedení, věcné připomínky a laskavý přístup. 2 ABSTRAKT Hlavní téma mé diplomové práce jsou prezidentské volby konané ve Spojených státech amerických v roce 2012. Práce vymezuje ústavní východisko nejen samotných voleb, ale take roli prezidenta Spojených států amerických v soustavě nejvyšších státních orgánů a také jeho pravomoci. Jádrem je popis systému dvou politických stran, volební kampaň a její financování, hlavní kandidáti včetně možných kandidátů na viceprezidenta, primárky, samotné všeobecné volby a jejich důsledky. Klíčová slova: Spojené státy americké, prezident, volby, primárky, Republikánská strana, Demokratická strana ABSTRACT The main topic of my diploma thesis is the presidential election held in the United States of America in 2012. The thesis defines a constitutional basis not only of election itself, but also of role of US President in the governmental system and also his powers. The core is a description of the two-party system, an election campaign and its funding, dominant candidates including potential candidates for the post of vice prezident, primaries, the general election itself and also the consequences of it. -
Honorable Nathan L. Hecht Chief Justice of Texas PRESIDENT-ELECT
Last Revised June 2021 PRESIDENT: Honorable Nathan L. Hecht Chief Justice of Texas PRESIDENT-ELECT: Honorable Paul A. Suttell Chief Justice of Rhode Island ALABAMA ARKANSAS Honorable Tom Parker Honorable John Dan Kemp Chief Justice Chief Justice Alabama Supreme Court Supreme Court of Arkansas 300 Dexter Avenue Justice Building Montgomery, AL 36104-3741 625 Marshall St. (334) 229-0600 FAX (334) 229-0535 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 682-6873 FAX (501) 683-4006 ALASKA CALIFORNIA Honorable Joel H. Bolger Chief Justice Honorable Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Alaska Supreme Court Chief Justice 303 K Street, 5th Floor Supreme Court of California Anchorage, AK 99501 350 McAllister Street (907) 264-0633 FAX (907) 264-0632 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 865-7060 FAX (415) 865-7181 AMERICAN SAMOA COLORADO Honorable F. Michael Kruse Chief Justice Honorable Brian D. Boatright The High Court of American Samoa Chief Justice Courthouse, P.O. Box 309 Colorado Supreme Court Pago Pago, AS 96799 2 East 14th Avenue 011 (684) 633-1410 FAX 011 (684) 633-1318 Denver, CO 80203-2116 (720) 625-5410 FAX (720) 271-6124 ARIZONA CONNECTICUT Honorable Robert M. Brutinel Chief Justice Honorable Richard A. Robinson Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice 1501 W. Washington Street, Suite 433 State of Connecticut Supreme Court Phoenix, AZ 85007-3222 231 Capitol Avenue (602) 452-3531 FAX (602) 452-3917 Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 757-2113 FAX (860) 757-2214 1 Last Revised June 2021 DELAWARE HAWAII Honorable Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Honorable Mark E. Recktenwald Chief Justice Chief Justice Supreme Court of Delaware Supreme Court of Hawaii The Renaissance Centre 417 South King Street 405 N.