DOCSLIB.ORG

Files –«Neuroprofiles» of Cells and Tissues in the State of Homeostatic Disbalance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Files –«Neuroprofiles» of Cells and Tissues in the State of Homeostatic Disbalance Authors: APRE (IT) and DST (ZA) Contibutors: MINECO (ES) and MISIS (RU) Project coordinator: EKT (GR) Graphic designer: APRE (IT) Copyright: Eurorisnet+ The research leading to these results has been funded by DG INFSO, under the Grant Agreement 283663 (Research Infrastructures Programme, FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2011-2). Report on global Research Infrastructures: a first mapping exercise Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 AFRICA ......................................................................................................................................... 8 ALGERIA ..................................................................................................................................... 19 EGYPT ........................................................................................................................................ 23 TUNISIA ...................................................................................................................................... 25 AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND ....................................................................................................... 27 CANADA ..................................................................................................................................... 40 CHINA ........................................................................................................................................ 47 WEST BALKANS ............................................................................................................................ 58 JAPAN ...................................................................................................................................... 116 JORDAN .................................................................................................................................... 124 KOREA ..................................................................................................................................... 126 LATIN AMERICA .......................................................................................................................... 128 ARGENTINA ............................................................................................................................... 138 BOLIVIA .................................................................................................................................... 153 BRAZIL ..................................................................................................................................... 155 CLOMBIA .................................................................................................................................. 163 COSTA RICA .............................................................................................................................. 167 CUBA ....................................................................................................................................... 170 CHILE ....................................................................................................................................... 174 ECUADOR ................................................................................................................................. 183 GUATEMALA ............................................................................................................................. 186 HONDURAS ............................................................................................................................... 188 MEXICO ................................................................................................................................... 190 PERÙ ....................................................................................................................................... 196 PUERTO RICO ............................................................................................................................ 201 URUGUAY ................................................................................................................................. 203 VENEZUELA ............................................................................................................................... 206 RUSSIA ..................................................................................................................................... 208 USA ........................................................................................................................................ 215 3 Report on global Research Infrastructures: a first mapping exercise Introduction Developing global research infrastructures and reinforcing cooperation of EU research infrastructures at international level are parts of the key commitments of the Innovation Union1. The Research Infrastructures play a relevant role in strengthening scientific innovation and its advantage is given by the possibility to gather many different stakeholders, from different countries. The two features that can make a Research Infrastructure a good resource for innovation are on one hand the high‐quality and on the other hand the accessibility of them. In order to reach a better quality and a greater accessibility, the European Commission gives increasingly importance to a global to the societal challenges that both European and no‐European countries are meeting and indeed they are at the core of the European strategy for implementing and consolidating this collaboration at worldwide level. This awareness clearly raising from the G8 meeting held in London2 in June 2013 during which the G8 Science Ministers discussed the importance cooperation among countries for research and innovation. The Research Infrastructures represent a befitting answer of Global Research Infrastructures, trying to identify international efforts and new opportunities for a global collaboration. During the meeting it was presented the evaluation work implemented by a Group of Senior Officials3 (GSO) which highlighted the need of a common framework. In order to reach this framework, the GSO identified common principles and developed a questionnaire for Global RI projects, giving information on their status and how they address the framework principles. The GSO developed a framework that would increase awareness, avoid duplication, increase scientific productivity and increase coordination of Global Research Infrastructures (GRI) considerations. It was very significant the wideness given to the concept of Research Infrastructures, gathering both physical, such as particle accelerators, and distributed RI, such as the European ELIXIR biological database, cohort studies or digitized text. Organizations such as the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) have moved toward developing ‘intellectual infrastructure’ including coordination of clinical populations and training activities. However, care should be taken to ensure that the concept of ‘infrastructure’ does not become too broad. 1 http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/index_en.cfm?pg=international_level 2 https://www.gov.uk/government/topical‐events/g8‐2013 3 The Carnegie Group of G8 + 05 Science Advisers recognised the potential for cooperation on issues related to global research infrastructures. They established a Group of Senior Officials (GSO) on Global Research Infrastructures to reach a common understanding on matters such as governance, funding and management of large‐scale research infrastructures. The European Commission is member of the GSO group. http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/index_en.cfm?pg=international_level 4 Report on global Research Infrastructures: a first mapping exercise ACTIONS The G8 Science Ministers adopted the Framework for GRIs decided by the GSO as the principles and reference terms under which G8 countries will consider cooperation on GRIs, and will encourage other nations to adopt them. The G8 Science Ministers approved a new mandate for the GSO to enable it to fulfill the areas of its original mandate that have not yet been addressed including: Promoting the Framework and continuing to exchange information on potential future research infrastructure that may present opportunities for international collaboration, noting especially the needs of the Global Challenges; Sharing information on national research infrastructure priorities and prioritization processes; identifying areas of potential benefit that could be achieved through sharing of best practices; Creating a representative list of GRIs open to global cooperation of interest to new partners. The GSO is invited to report to the G8 Science Ministers in 2015. The Russian Government has offered to host the 2014 GSO meeting. The EuroRIsnet+ project as network of RI National Contact Point (NCPs) aims to collect information on Research Infrastructures in the world, on policies, initiatives and studies related to the promotion of international research infrastructure partnerships, which could assist NCPs in the execution of their responsibilities. This report addresses the research infrastructure portfolio in an integrated manner, i.e. including both a focus on research infrastructures and e‐infrastructures. THE REPORT4 The following report on global Research Infrastructures has been realised with the collaboration of different RI NCPs. In particular, the in‐depth analysis of different global areas is the result
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explorer's Gazette
    EEXXPPLLOORREERR’’SS GGAAZZEETTTTEE Published Quarterly in Pensacola, Florida USA for the Old Antarctic Explorers Association Uniting All OAEs in Perpetuating the Memory of United States Involvement in Antarctica Volume 18, Issue 4 Old Antarctic Explorers Association, Inc Oct-Dec 2018 Photo by Jack Green The first C-17 of the summer season delivers researchers and support staff to McMurdo Station after a two-week weather delay. Science Bouncing Back From A Delayed Start By Mike Lucibella The first flights from Christchurch to McMurdo were he first planes of the 2018-2019 Summer Season originally scheduled for 1 October, but throughout early Ttouched down at McMurdo Station’s Phoenix October, a series of low-pressure systems parked over the Airfield at 3 pm in the afternoon on 16 October after region and brought days of bad weather, blowing snow more than two weeks of weather delays, the longest and poor visibility. postponement of season-opening in recent memory. Jessie L. Crain, the Antarctic research support Delays of up to a few days are common for manager in the Office of Polar Programs at the National researchers and support staff flying to McMurdo Station, Science Foundation (NSF), said that it is too soon yet to Antarctica from Christchurch, New Zealand. However, a say definitively what the effects of the delay will be on fifteen-day flight hiatus is very unusual. the science program. Continued on page 4 E X P L O R E R ‘ S G A Z E T T E V O L U M E 18, I S S U E 4 O C T D E C 2 0 1 8 P R E S I D E N T ’ S C O R N E R Ed Hamblin—OAEA President TO ALL OAEs—I hope you all had a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year holiday.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomija, Kosmosas, Inovacijos (50 Užduočių Uždavinynas, Klausimai/Atsakymai)
    SPACEOLYMP EKA sutartis Nr. 4000115691/15/NL/NDe Astronomija, Kosmosas, Inovacijos (50 užduočių uždavinynas, Klausimai/Atsakymai) Uždavinyne misijų ir jų etapų laikas nurodomas pagal Pasaulinį koordinuotąjį laiką arba UTC (angl. Coordinated Universal Time) 1 SPACEOLYMP EKA sutartis Nr. 4000115691/15/NL/NDe TURINYS Įvadas ......................................................................................................................... F 8 klasė A-8.1 ......................................................................................................................8.1 A-8.2 .....................................................................................................................8.2 A-8.3 .....................................................................................................................8.3 A-8.4 .....................................................................................................................8.4 A-8.5 .....................................................................................................................8.5 A-8.6 .....................................................................................................................8.6 A-8.7 .....................................................................................................................8.7 A-8.8 .....................................................................................................................8.8 A-8.9 .....................................................................................................................8.9
    [Show full text]
  • Land-Based Tourism in Antarctica
    IP (number) Agenda Item: CEP 7b, ATCM 10 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Land-Based Tourism in Antarctica 1 IP (number) Summary This paper examines the interface between commercial land based tourism and the use of national program infrastructure, as well as recent developments in land-based tourism. Eight Parties responded to a questionnaire distributed by ASOC at ATCMs XXXI and XXXII. None of the respondents reported providing any support to tourism other than free basic hospitality, and most respondents explicitly opposed the notion of Parties being involved in tourism operations. Based on these responses it is apparent that some Parties have identified two locations where commercial land based tourism takes place using infrastructure from National Antarctic Programs. All land-based tourism operations rely directly or indirectly on some form of state support, including permits, use of runways, and use of facilities and terrain adjacent to research stations. The continued improvement of land-based facilities such as runways and camps, and the broad array of land activities now available to tourists, indicate that land-based tourism is growing. If no actions are taken soon, land-based tourism may well become consolidated as a major activity in a few years. 1. Overview In 2008 ASOC submitted to XXXI ATCM IP 41, A decade of Antarctic tourism: Status, change, and actions needed. Among other issues relevant to Antarctic tourism, ASOC’s IP 41 discussed the interface between commercial land-based tourism and the activities of national Antarctic programs. The paper remarked on a disturbing lack of clarity with regard to aspects of land-based tourism – what an IAATO representative described aptly as “fogginess”.1 ASOC’s IP 41 included a table listing several facilities used to support land- based tourism, some of which were private commercial facilities and other facilities of National Antarctic programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(MULTIF15)001 the Impact of Space Exper- (Giovannelli & Sabau-Graziati, 2004) † ∗ [email protected] [email protected] Speaker
    Multifrequency Astrophysics: An Updated Review PoS(MULTIF15)001 Franco Giovannelli∗† INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00133 Roma, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Lola Sabau-Graziati INTA- Dpt. Cargas Utiles y Ciencias del Espacio, C/ra de Ajalvir, Km 4 - E28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected] In this paper – a short updated version of our review paper about "The impact of space exper- iments on our knowledge of the physics of the Universe (Giovannelli & Sabau-Graziati, 2004) (GSG2004) and subsequent updating (Giovannelli & Sabau-Graziati, 2012a, 2014a) – we will briefly discuss old and new results obtained in astrophysics, that marked substantially the re- search in this field. Thanks to the results, chosen by us following our knowledge and feelings, we will go along different stages of the evolution of our Universe discussing briefly several examples of results that are the pillars carrying the Bridge between the Big Bang and Biology. We will remark the importance of the joint venture of ‘active physics experiments’ and ‘passive physics experiments’ ground– and space–based either big either small in size that, with their results, are directed towards the knowledge of the physics of our universe. New generation exper- iments open up new prospects for improving our knowledge of the aforementioned main pillars. XI Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources Workshop 25-30 May 2015 Palermo, Italy ∗Speaker. †A footnote may follow. ⃝c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • What We Learned from the Tokyo Tech 50 Kg-Satellite "TSUBAME"
    SSC17-WK-41 What we learned from the Tokyo Tech 50 kg-satellite “TSUBAME” Yoichi YATSU, Nobuyuki KAWAI Dept. of Physics, School of Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology 2-12-1, Ohokayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551, JAPAN; +81-3-5734-238 [email protected] Masanori MATSUSHITA, Shota KAWAJIRI, Kyosuke TAWARA, Kei Ohta, Masaya KOGA, Saburo MATUNAGA Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology 2-12-1, Ohokayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551, JAPAN Shin’ichi KIMURA Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Tokyo University of Science 2641, Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, JAPAN ABSTRACT A 50 kg-class micro satellite “TSUBAME” was launched in 2014. After a critical phase, the receiving sensitivity of the RF system on board the satellite dropped significantly and the way for command uplink was lost. A thorough investigation was conducted after the failure to determine the causes, based on the obtained telemetry and reproductive experiments in lab room. The detailed data analysis revealed many other malfunctions had occurred. In parallel with the investigation of the fault points, we also classified these malfunctions into several categories in terms of development phase, technological aspects, and management. 1. INTRODUCTION This was the fourth project for Tokyo Tech and therefore it was designed and managed based on the knowledge During the last 10 years, small satellites have become acquired from the previous CubeSats projects, CUTE-I one of the most exciting topic in space technology. At (2003~), Cute-1.7+APD (2006~2008), Cute-1.7+APD II the beginning, these small satellites were mostly aimed (2008~).
    [Show full text]
  • Waba Directory 2003
    DIAMOND DX CLUB www.ddxc.net WABA DIRECTORY 2003 1 January 2003 DIAMOND DX CLUB WABA DIRECTORY 2003 ARGENTINA LU-01 Alférez de Navió José María Sobral Base (Army)1 Filchner Ice Shelf 81°04 S 40°31 W AN-016 LU-02 Almirante Brown Station (IAA)2 Coughtrey Peninsula, Paradise Harbour, 64°53 S 62°53 W AN-016 Danco Coast, Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-19 Byers Camp (IAA) Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South 62°39 S 61°00 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-04 Decepción Detachment (Navy)3 Primero de Mayo Bay, Port Foster, 62°59 S 60°43 W AN-010 Deception Island, South Shetland Islands LU-07 Ellsworth Station4 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°38 S 41°08 W AN-016 LU-06 Esperanza Base (Army)5 Seal Point, Hope Bay, Trinity Peninsula 63°24 S 56°59 W AN-016 (Antarctic Peninsula) LU- Francisco de Gurruchaga Refuge (Navy)6 Harmony Cove, Nelson Island, South 62°18 S 59°13 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-10 General Manuel Belgrano Base (Army)7 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°46 S 38°11 W AN-016 LU-08 General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army)8 Bertrab Nunatak, Vahsel Bay, Luitpold 77°52 S 34°37 W AN-016 Coast, Coats Land LU-09 General Manuel Belgrano III Base (Army)9 Berkner Island, Filchner-Ronne Ice 77°34 S 45°59 W AN-014 Shelves LU-11 General San Martín Base (Army)10 Barry Island in Marguerite Bay, along 68°07 S 67°06 W AN-016 Fallières Coast of Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-21 Groussac Refuge (Navy)11 Petermann Island, off Graham Coast of 65°11 S 64°10 W AN-006 Graham Land (West); Antarctic Peninsula LU-05 Melchior Detachment (Navy)12 Isla Observatorio
    [Show full text]
  • K4MZU Record WAP WACA Antarctic Program Award
    W.A.P. - W.A.C.A. Sheet (Page 1 of 10) Callsign: K4MZU Ex Call: - Country: U.S.A. Name: Robert Surname: Hines City: McDonough Address: 1978 Snapping Shoals Road Zip Code: GA-30252 Province: GA Award: 146 Send Record Sheet E-mail 23/07/2020 Check QSLs: IK1GPG & IK1QFM Date: 17/05/2012 Total Stations: 490 Tipo Award: Hunter H.R.: YES TOP H.R.: YES Date update: 23/07/2020 Date: - Date Top H.R.: - E-mail: [email protected] Ref. Call worked Date QSO Base Name o Station . ARGENTINA ARG-Ø1 LU1ZAB 15/02/1996 . Teniente Benjamin Matienzo Base (Air Force) ARG-Ø2 LU1ZE 30/01/1996 . Almirante Brown Base (Army) ARG-Ø2 LU5ZE 15/01/1982 . Almirante Brown Base (Army) ARG-Ø4 LU1ZV 17/11/1993 . Esperanza Base (Army) ARG-Ø6 LU1ZG 09/10/1990 . General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army) ARG-Ø6 LU2ZG 27/12/1981 . General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army) ARG-Ø8 LU1ZD 19/12/1993 . General San Martin Base (Army) ARG-Ø9 LU2ZD 19/01/1994 . Primavera Base (Army) (aka Capitan Cobett Base) ARG-11 LW7EYK/Z 01/02/1994 . Byers Camp (IAA) ARG-11 LW8EYK/Z 23/12/1994 . Byers Camp (IAA) ARG-12 LU1ZC 28/01/1973 . Destacamento Naval Decepción Base (Navy) ARG-12 LU2ZI 19/08/1967 . Destacamento Naval Decepción Base (Navy) ARG-13 LU1ZB 13/12/1995 . Destacamento Naval Melchior Base (Navy) ARG-15 AY1ZA 31/01/2004 . Destacamento Naval Orcadas del Sur Base (Navy) ARG-15 LU1ZA 19/02/1995 . Destacamento Naval Orcadas del Sur Base (Navy) ARG-15 LU5ZA 02/01/1983 .
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Trace Metal Concentration in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments Near Artigas Antarctic Scientific Base (King George Island, Maritime Antarctica)
    Water Air Soil Pollut (2018) 229:398 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4045-1 An Evaluation of Trace Metal Concentration in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments near Artigas Antarctic Scientific Base (King George Island, Maritime Antarctica) C. Bueno & N. Kandratavicius & N. Venturini & R. C. L. Figueira & L. Pérez & K. Iglesias & E. Brugnoli Received: 19 July 2018 /Accepted: 20 November 2018 # Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Abstract An evaluation of the concentration of metals stations in Maxwell Bay were placed one near the in terrestrial and aquatic environments near Artigas Artigas Base (AB) and two far from it in North Cove Antarctic Scientific Base was assessed. Granulometric (NC1, NC2). Some of the terrestrial stations (T2, T10, characteristics, total organic matter content, concentra- T11 and T13) presented the highest concentration of tion of metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) and metals and Igeo values, which was associated to an- metalloid (As) in soil, marine and freshwater sediments thropic activities. Highest metal levels were related to were determined. The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) fuel storage and handling, but also, with sewage release was used in order to analyse the contamination magni- and the presence of old leaded paint residues. These tude. Samples were collected in summer 2015–2016 polluted sites were limited to a restricted area of Artigas covering 31 sampling stations; 15 terrestrial/soil stations Base, not affecting surrounding environments. Concen- (T0–T14) were placed considering the distribution of trations of the analysed metals in unpolluted sites had Artigas Base buildings and the septic tanks’ location. the same order of magnitude recorded in other unpol- Eleven freshwater stations were placed along the three luted areas of the Fildes Peninsula and other Antarctic meltwater streams near Artigas Base (S0–S10), and two regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Republic of Germany Antarctic Treaty
    FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ANTARCTIC TREATY EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION UNDER ARTICLES III (1) AND VII (5) FOR 2005 – 2006 Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs Berlin October 2005 1. PRE-SEASON INFORMATION (01 October 2005 – 30 September 2006) .....................................................2 1.1 Operational Information ..............................................................................................................................2 1.1.1 National Expeditions ............................................................................................................................2 1.1.2 Non-governmental expeditions ............................................................................................................9 1.2 Visits to protected Areas...........................................................................................................................16 2. ANNUAL REPORT (01 October 2004 – 30 September 2005).......................................................................17 2.1 Scientific Information ................................................................................................................................17 2.1.1 Forward Plans ....................................................................................................................................17 2.1.2 Science Activities in the previous year (01 October 2004 – 30 September 2005) ............................17 2.2 Operational Information ............................................................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Space Program
    Notes de l’Ifri Asie.Visions 115 Japan’s Space Program Shifting Away from “Non-Offensive” Purposes? Lionel FATTON July 2020 Center for Asian Studies The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non- governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 979-10-373-0208-3 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2020 How to cite this publication: Lionel Fatton, “Japan’s Space Program: Shifting Away from “Non-Offensive” Purposes?”, Asie.Visions, No. 115, Ifri, July 2020. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE Tel. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 – Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Author Lionel Fatton is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Webster University Geneva. He is also Research Collaborator at the Research Institute for the History of Global Arms Transfer, Meiji University, Tokyo, and Adjunct Fellow at The Charhar Institute, Beijing. His research interests include international and security dynamics in the Asia-Pacific, China- Japan-US relations, Japan’s security policy, civil-military relations and neoclassical realism. Lionel holds a PhD in Political Science, specialization International Relations, from Sciences Po Paris and two MA in International Relations from Waseda University in Tokyo and the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • 2571 Country Code
    2571 Country Code. CountryCode.org is your complete guide to call anywhere in the world. The calling chart above will help you find the dialing codes you need to make long distance phone calls to friends, family, and business partners around the globe. Simply find and click the country you wish to call. You'll find instructions on how to call that country using its country code, as well as other helpful information like area codes, ISO country codes, and the kinds of electrical outlets and phone jacks found in that part of the world. Making a phone call has never been easier with CountryCode.org. The 2-letter codes shown below are supplied by the ISO ( International Organization for Standardization). It bases its list of country names and abbreviations on the list of names published by the United Nations. The UN also uses 3-letter codes, and numerical codes to identify nations, and those are shown below. International Dialing Codes for making overseas phone calls are also listed below. Note: If the columns don't align correctly, please increase the font size in your browser. COUNTRY A2 (ISO) A3 (UN) NUM (UN) DIALING CODE Afghanistan AF AFG 4 93 Albania AL ALB 8 355 Algeria DZ DZA 12 213 American Samoa AS ASM 16 1-684 Andorra AD AND 20 376 Angola AO AGO 24 244 Anguilla AI AIA 660 1-264 Antarctica AQ ATA 10 672 Antigua and Barbuda AG ATG 28 1-268 Argentina AR ARG 32 54 Armenia AM ARM 51 374 Aruba AW ABW 533 297 Australia AU AUS 36 61 Austria AT AUT 40 43 Azerbaijan AZ AZE 31 994 Bahamas BS BHS 44 1-242 Bahrain BH BHR 48 973 Bangladesh BD
    [Show full text]