DOCSLIB.ORG

Index from No Place to Hide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index from No Place to Hide INDEX FROM NO PLACE TO HIDE BUY THE BOOK: E-BOOK GLENNGREENWALD.NET INDEX ABC, 235 AOL, 21, 108, 110 ABC News, 233 Apple, 21, 75, 108, 110 abortion, 133, 181 Apuzzo, Matt, 186 Abramson, Jill, 224–25, 240 Arab Spring, 4 Abu Ghraib scandal, 235 Area SpA, 4 Access and Target Development (NSA), Argentina, 126 148 Armed Forces Services Corporation accountability, 42, 202, 209, 244 (AFSC), 123 Ackerman, Spencer, 67 ARTIFICE, 107 Aerofl ot, 135 Assad, Bashar al-, 4 Afghanistan War, 188 Assange, Julian, 188, 219, 226–27 Agriculture, Department of, 136 assassinations, 5, 202 airlines, 163–66 Associated Press, 72, 85, 186 Alexander, Keith B., 92, 95–97, 138–39, surveillance of, 60, 213 203–4, 221 AT&T, 103, 168, 233 Algeria, 123 Atlantic, 205, 237 Al Qaeda, 199, 204, 206 Aurora shootings, 203 Amanpour, Christiane, 232 Australia, 23, 91, 122 Amash, Justin, 249 Austria, 123 American citizens. See domestic Axelrod, David, 235 surveillance American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), backdoor surveillance, 118–10, 147 19, 71, 109, 114, 127, 133, 171, 185, 187 Balkin, Jack, 127 Amesys, 4 Bamford, James, 95, 153, 201 Anonymous, 8, 189–91 banking and fi nancial records, 118, 135, antiwar activists, 183–86, 196 138, 201, 205 020-58305_ch02_2P.indd 277 5/7/14 7:37 AM 278 INDEX Baquet, Dean, 233 BUFFALOGREEN, 106 BBC, 234 Bulgaria, 145 BEBO, 161 Burns, John, 226, 231–32 Belgium, 123, 138 Bush, George W., 1–2, 5, 55–56, 58, 96, Bentham, Jeremy, 175–76, 209 127, 182, 185, 197–98, 217 Bergen, Peter, 204 Bernstein, Walter, 178 Campbell, Duncan, 238 Biden, Joe, 199 Campbell, Joseph, 45 Bing search, 156 Canada, 23, 91, 94, 119–20, 124, 135, 221 Binney, William, 99 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Blackberry, 165 (CBC), 221 BLACKHEART, 147 Carle, Glenn, 206 blacklist, 178 Carney, Jay, 235 black nationalists, 184 CBS News, 222 BLACKPEARL, 135 cell phones, 12, 37–38, 122, 166, 201 BLARNEY, 102–3, 108, 136–37, 142–43, Center for Advanced Study of Language, 150, 160 University of Maryland, 41 “Blogger, with Focus on Surveillance” Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), 216 (New York Times article), 212 Al-Qaeda and, 204 Bloomberg News, 4 black sites and, 55 Bolivia, 49 domestic spying and, 179, 185 Booz Allen Hamilton, 48, 80, 84, 101, 168 Hayden as head of, 96, 217 Bosnia, 143 journalists and, 219, 229 Boston Marathon bombing, 203 media and, 234 BOUNDLESS INFORMANT, 30, 59, Miranda laptop and, 236–37 81–82, 92–93 NSA data sharing and, 116, 136 Brandeis, Louis, 172 NYPD surveillance of Muslims and, Brandenburg v. Ohio, 183 186 Brazil, 90, 92, 103, 106, 126, 138–39, 141, Obama advisory panel on surveillance 144–45, 202, 243–44, 250 and, 202 Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy, Snowden’s work for, 41–44, 47, 84 94, 119–21, 135 Swiss bankers and, 42 BRECKENRIDGE cable site, 107 CHAOS operation (CIA), 185 Britain (United Kingdom). See also Chavez, Hugo, 139 Government Communications Cheney, Dick, 217 Headquarters (GCHQ) Chilling Eff ects: NSA Surveillance domestic spying and, 122 Drives U.S. Writers to Self-Censor Five Eyes and, 91 (PEN report, 2013), 178 Guardian and, 238, 240 “Chilling Eff ects of Surveillance, Th e” internal unrest and, 177 (White and Zimbardo), 179–80 journalists and, 238, 245 China, 5, 92, 126, 135, 147–48, 151, 227 Miranda detention and, 186, 241–46 Snowden accused of spying for, 49–50, suspicionless surveillance and, 1–4 223–26 Broadwell, Paula, 8 Chinese Internet companies, 147–48, 151 Brooks, David, 223 Christmas-day bomber, 203 Brzezinski, Mika, 89 Church, Frank, 3, 201 020-58305_ch02_2P.indd 278 5/7/14 7:37 AM INDEX 279 Church Committee, 27, 184–85, 251 data storage, 151–53, 159–60 “Cincinnatus,” 7–10, 12, 81–82 dating services, 133 Cisco, 150 Defense, Department of, 135–36 civil liberties, 208 Defense Intelligence Agency, 32, 44, 136 civil rights movement, 183–84, 196 Dell Corporation, 43, 47–48, 101 Clapper, James, 30–31, 221 democracy, 202, 207–9, 252. See also Clemons, Steve, 237–38 freedom Clinton, Hillary, 139 Democracy Now! (TV show), 99 Close Access SIGADS, 145–46 Democratic National Committee, 223 CNBC, 170, 219 Democrats, 197–200, 249 CNET, 171 Denial of Service attacks, 192–93 CNN, 71–72, 126, 155, 204, 216, 217, 218, Denmark, 93, 123 231–32 Dershowitz, Alan, 217 Cohen, Richard, 222 Destination Short Message Entity (DSME), COINTELPRO, 183–84 132 Coleman, Gabriella, 190 detention, 5, 14, 241–46 Colombia, 106, 145 DEWSWEEPER, 147 Comey, James, 221 Dialed Number Recognition (DNR), 92 Commerce, Department of, 136 Digital Network Intelligence (DNI), Committee to Protect Journalists, 214 92–93, 105, 124 Communications Services Establishment diplomatic espionage, 94, 139–47, 202 Canada (CSEC), 119–20 Discipline and Punish (Foucault), 176 Communists, 184, 196 disruption and deception techniques, Computer Network Exploitation (CNE), 190–94 117 “Disruption Operational Playbook” conservatives, 198 (GCHQ), 194 content dissent, 3–5, 50, 174, 177–200 metadata vs., 132–34 demonization of, 224–28 storage and search, 153–60 FBI and, 183–85 Conyers, John, 249 GCHQ and, 190–93 Cooper, Anderson, 216 NSA and, 185–90 Cornyn, John, 208 domestic surveillance, 1, 3, 5, 29–32, 74, Corona, Jorge, 140 90–93, 96, 99–100, 124, 126–29, 131, Corporate Partner Access (CPA) portfolio, 169, 171, 177–78, 189, 195–202. See 102–3 also contents; metadata; National Croatia, 123 Security Agency; surveillance; Cryptocat, 59 warrantless wiretapping scandal; and CRYPTO ENABLED, 147 specifi c agencies and programs C-SPAN, 249 Five Eyes and, 23–24 Cuba, 139, 224 prohibition on, 201 CUSTOMS, 147 spending on, 206–7 Czech Republic, 123 Downie, Leonard, Jr., 214 drones, 43, 229 database searches, 153–60 DROPMIRE, 147 Data Intercept Technology Unit drug addiction centers, 133 (DITU, FBI), 115 drug-related cases, 200 020-58305_ch02_2P.indd 279 5/7/14 7:37 AM 280 INDEX East German Ministry of State Security PRISM and, 77, 113–16 (Stasi), 4, 176–77 roving bugs and, 37 economic espionage, 94, 134–39, 147, Snowden and, 51–52 167–68, 202 STORMBREW and, 107 Ecuador, 49 X-KEYSCORE and, 160 “Edward Snowden: Th e Whistleblower Feinstein, Dianne, 71, 130–31, 133, 171–72 Behind the NSA Surveillance Felten, Edward, 133–34 Revelations” (Guardian article) fi ber-optic cables, 92, 101, 103–4, 107, 119 84–85 fi nancial crisis of 2008, 177 EGOTISTICAL GIRAFFE, 94 Finland, 123 Egypt, 4, 141, 196 First Amendment, 183, 208 elections of 2004, 55–56 FISA. See Foreign Intelligence Electronic Communications Surveillance Surveillance Act Unit (ECSU, FBI), 114 Five Eyes alliance (FVEY), 23, 91, 95–97, Ellsberg, Daniel, 30, 84, 226 118–23, 161, 164, 166 emails, 92, 94, 99–100, 119, 122, 153–54, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act 157–58, 178, 201, 252 (FISA, 1978), 27, 201 journalists and, 213 Amendments Act (2008), 74–75, 116, metadata and, 133 126–28 encryption, 8–9, 94, 115, 118–19, 205, 225, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act 252 (FISA) court, 27–30, 127–30, 143, Energy, Department of, 136 228–30, 251 Energy and Research Branch (NSA), 138 Verizon and, 27–28, 30, 58–59, 61–72, energy companies, 134–35, 137–38 75, 78, 91, 93–94 environmentalists, 183, 186 Yahoo! and, 109 Espionage Act (1917), 50, 59, 222 foreign leaders, 138–42, 202 Ethiopia, 123 foreign nationals, 127 European tech companies, 252 “Foreign Partner Review” European Union, 92, 103, 138, 145, 251 Fiscal Year 2012, 124 Evolutionary Psychology, 178 Fiscal year 2013, 123 executive power, 1–2, 14, 128 foreign partners, 90, 101, 118–26 Foreign Policy, 95, 96, 109, 148, 206 Facebook, 18, 20–21, 74–75, 77, 84, 108–11, foreign press, 234 119, 126, 155–56, 158, 160–63, 165, foreign telecoms, 92, 103–7 170–71, 194, 252 Foucault, Michel, 176 Face the Nation (TV show), 199, 231 Fourth Amendment, 1–3, 207–8, 250 facsimiles (faxes), 122, 132, 168, 192 Fox News, 60, 213, 215–17 FAIRVIEW, 102, 104–5, 108, 150 France, 4, 90, 93, 103, 123, 138, 144–45, 148 false fl ag operations, 190, 194 Frank, Anne, 5 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), freedom 3, 207 privacy and, 172–74 Al Qaeda and, 204 safety and, 207 COINTELPRO and, 183–85 Snowden on, 46–47 journalists and, 60, 221 surveillance and, 174–80, 196, 201–2 Muslims and, 186 freedom of assembly, 180 Patriot Act and, 28 freedom of association, 183 020-58305_ch02_2P.indd 280 5/7/14 7:37 AM INDEX 281 freedom of speech, 179–80, 183 NSA partnership with, 118–19 freedom of the press, 32, 65, 183, 213–22, PROJECT BULLRUN and, 94 230–31 TARMAC and, 97 UK and, 238–40 Th ieving Magpie and, 164–65 Grayson, Alan, 130, 220–21 Gabon, 143 Greece, 103, 123, 145, 177, 216 gays and lesbians, 133 Greek mythology, 45 Gazprom, 135 Gregory, David, 217–19, 229–30 GCHQ. See Government Griffi th, Morgan, 130 Communications Headquarters Guantanamo, 245 Gellman, Barton, 18, 54, 57–58, 77, 109, Guardian, 81, 91, 224 181–82, 220 choice of, for Snowden story, 21–22, GENIE, 147 58–59 Georgia, 145 fi rst NSA article of, 210 Germany, 4, 90, 92, 103, 123, 138, 176–77. fi rst Snowden stories published by, See also Nazi Germany 53–54, 59–78 Gibbs, Robert, 235 GCHQ reporting by, 118–19, 122 Gibson, Janine, 21–26, 59–61, 63–64, GCHQ threats to, and hard drive, 66–69, 73–78, 224–25, 238–39, 242, 238–41, 245 244 Hersh and, 235 Global Access Operations unit, 92 Hong Kong support for Snowden and, Global Telecoms Exploitation 86–89 (GTE, GCHQ), 119, 161–63 Hong Kong trip and, 22–27, 62–63 Gmail, 8, 77, 155–56 impact of Snowden stories and, 248–49 Goldman, Adam, 186 Miranda and, 237, 241–44 Goldsmith, Jack, 234 New York Times and 225, 240–41 Good Morning America (TV show), 71 Snowden identity revealed by, 84–85 Google, 18, 20, 21, 74–75,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mutual Watching and Resistance to Mass Surveillance After Snowden
    Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) 2015, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 12-25 Doi: 10.17645/mac.v3i3.277 Article “Veillant Panoptic Assemblage”: Mutual Watching and Resistance to Mass Surveillance after Snowden Vian Bakir School of Creative Studies and Media, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2DG, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 9 April 2015 | In Revised Form: 16 July 2015 | Accepted: 4 August 2015 | Published: 20 October 2015 Abstract The Snowden leaks indicate the extent, nature, and means of contemporary mass digital surveillance of citizens by their intelligence agencies and the role of public oversight mechanisms in holding intelligence agencies to account. As such, they form a rich case study on the interactions of “veillance” (mutual watching) involving citizens, journalists, intelli- gence agencies and corporations. While Surveillance Studies, Intelligence Studies and Journalism Studies have little to say on surveillance of citizens’ data by intelligence agencies (and complicit surveillant corporations), they offer insights into the role of citizens and the press in holding power, and specifically the political-intelligence elite, to account. Atten- tion to such public oversight mechanisms facilitates critical interrogation of issues of surveillant power, resistance and intelligence accountability. It directs attention to the veillant panoptic assemblage (an arrangement of profoundly une- qual mutual watching, where citizens’ watching of self and others is, through corporate channels of data flow, fed back into state surveillance of citizens). Finally, it enables evaluation of post-Snowden steps taken towards achieving an equiveillant panoptic assemblage (where, alongside state and corporate surveillance of citizens, the intelligence-power elite, to ensure its accountability, faces robust scrutiny and action from wider civil society).
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit a Case 3:16-Cr-00051-BR Document 545-2 Filed 05/11/16 Page 2 of 86
    Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 545-2 Filed 05/11/16 Page 1 of 86 Exhibit A Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 545-2 Filed 05/11/16 Page 2 of 86 Executive Order 12333 United States Intelligence Activities (As amended by Executive Orders 13284 (2003), 13355 (2004) and 134 70 (2008)) PREAMBLE Timely, accurate, and insightful information about the activities, capabilities, plans, and intentions of foreign powers , organizations, and persons, and their agents, is essential to the national security of the United States. All reasonable and lawful means must be used to ensure that the United States will receive the best intelligence possible. For that purpose, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, (Act) and as President of the United States of America, in order to provide for the effective conduct of United States intelligence activities and the protection of constitutional rights, it is hereby ordered as follows: PART 1 Goals, Directions, Duties, and Responsibilities with Respect to United States Intelligence Efforts 1.1 Goals. The United States intelligence effort shall provide the President, the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council with the necessary information on which to base decisions concerning the development and conduct of foreign, defense, and economic policies, and the protection of United States national interests from foreign security threats. All departments and agencies shall cooperate fully to fulfill this goal. (a} All means, consistent with applicable Federal law and this order, and with full consideration of the rights of United States persons, shall be used to obtain reliable intelligence information to protect the United States and its interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Church, And/ Or United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, And/Or U.S
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 84652B 11 July 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 7 June 2016 for Intellipedia pages on the Church Committee, and/ or Frank Church, and/ or United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, and/or U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. A copy of your request is enclosed. In our initial response to you, dated 8 June 2016, we informed you that this request was assigned case number 84652 and that there are no assessable fees for this request. We provided you with two responsive documents on 12 August 2016 and informed you that we continued to work on your case. The final responsive documents are enclosed. This Agency is authorized by statute to protect certain information concerning its activities (in this case, internal URLs) as well as the names of its employees. Such information is exempt from disclosure pursuant to the third exemption of the FOIA, which provides for the withholding of information specifically protected from disclosure by statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Order 12,333: Unleashing the CIA Violates the Leash Law Sherri J
    Cornell Law Review Volume 70 Article 6 Issue 5 June 1985 Executive Order 12,333: Unleashing the CIA Violates the Leash Law Sherri J. Conrad Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sherri J. Conrad, Executive Order 12,333: Unleashing the CIA Violates the Leash Law, 70 Cornell L. Rev. 968 (1985) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol70/iss5/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXECUTIVE ORDER 12,333: "UNLEASHING" THE CIA VIOLATES THE LEASH LAW "Security is like liberty in that many are the crimes committed in its name." On December 4, 1981, President Ronald Reagan promulgated Executive Order 12,333, establishing United States intelligence guidelines. 2 Restrictions on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) were instituted in the 1970s in response to disclosures of wide- spread wrongdoing.3 The Order reflects the President's determina- tion to "unleash" 4 America's intelligence community5 from those limitations. The Order allows the CIA, America's chief foreign in- telligence gathering entity, to direct domestic counterintelligence, foreign intelligence, covert operations, and law enforcement activity against United States citizens. 6 The drafters of the Order ignored the statutory limits on intelligence gathering activity codified in the National Security Act. 7 The President's action thus constitutes a statutorily impermissible license for renewed government intrusion, and the Order should be revoked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Privacy and the Future of Mass Surveillance’
    ‘The Right to Privacy and the Future of Mass Surveillance’ ABSTRACT This article considers the feasibility of the adoption by the Council of Europe Member States of a multilateral binding treaty, called the Intelligence Codex (the Codex), aimed at regulating the working methods of state intelligence agencies. The Codex is the result of deep concerns about mass surveillance practices conducted by the United States’ National Security Agency (NSA) and the United Kingdom Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). The article explores the reasons for such a treaty. To that end, it identifies the discriminatory nature of the United States’ and the United Kingdom’s domestic legislation, pursuant to which foreign cyber surveillance programmes are operated, which reinforces the need to broaden the scope of extraterritorial application of the human rights treaties. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the US and UK foreign mass surveillance se practices interferes with the right to privacy of communications and cannot be justified under Article 17 ICCPR and Article 8 ECHR. As mass surveillance seems set to continue unabated, the article supports the calls from the Council of Europe to ban cyber espionage and mass untargeted cyber surveillance. The response to the proposal of a legally binding Intelligence Codexhard law solution to mass surveillance problem from the 47 Council of Europe governments has been so far muted, however a soft law option may be a viable way forward. Key Words: privacy, cyber surveillance, non-discrimination, Intelligence Codex, soft law. Introduction Peacetime espionage is by no means a new phenomenon in international relations.1 It has always been a prevalent method of gathering intelligence from afar, including through electronic means.2 However, foreign cyber surveillance on the scale revealed by Edward Snowden performed by the United States National Security Agency (NSA), the United Kingdom Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and their Five Eyes partners3 1 Geoffrey B.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocating for Basic Constitutional Search Protections to Apply to Cell Phones from Eavesdropping and Tracking by Government and Corporate Entities
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2013 Brave New World Reloaded: Advocating for Basic Constitutional Search Protections to Apply to Cell Phones from Eavesdropping and Tracking by Government and Corporate Entities Mark Berrios-Ayala University of Central Florida Part of the Legal Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Berrios-Ayala, Mark, "Brave New World Reloaded: Advocating for Basic Constitutional Search Protections to Apply to Cell Phones from Eavesdropping and Tracking by Government and Corporate Entities" (2013). HIM 1990-2015. 1519. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1519 BRAVE NEW WORLD RELOADED: ADVOCATING FOR BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL SEARCH PROTECTIONS TO APPLY TO CELL PHONES FROM EAVESDROPPING AND TRACKING BY THE GOVERNMENT AND CORPORATE ENTITIES by MARK KENNETH BERRIOS-AYALA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Legal Studies in the College of Health and Public Affairs and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2013 Thesis Chair: Dr. Abby Milon ABSTRACT Imagine a world where someone’s personal information is constantly compromised, where federal government entities AKA Big Brother always knows what anyone is Googling, who an individual is texting, and their emoticons on Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fifth: Rural Youth and Substance Abuse
    THE FORGOTTEN FIFTH: RURAL YOUTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE Lisa R. Pruitt* This Article seeks to raise the visibility of the roughly twenty percent of the U.S. population who live in rural places—an often forgotten fifth—in rela- tion to the particular challenges presented by adolescent substance abuse. De- spite popular notions that substance abuse is essentially an urban phenomenon, recent data demonstrate that it is also a significant problem in rural America. Rural youth now abuse most substances, including alcohol and tobacco, at higher rates and at younger ages than their urban peers. The Article assesses the social, economic and spatial milieu in which rural adolescent substance abuse has burgeoned. Features of some rural communi- ties, such as a tolerance for youth and lenient and informal law enforcement responses, appear to benefit youth. Indeed, these are consistent with juvenile justice trends, such as diversion programs. Yet other characteristics of rural communities, such as limited social service and healthcare infrastructures, un- dermine the efficacy of such programs. Arguing that national drug policies often reflect urban agendas and leave rural communities disserved, this Article calls for policies that are more sensi- tive to rural contexts. It advocates nuanced empirical research that will provide a more comprehensive understanding of rural risk factors and, in turn, inform rural prevention, treatment, and diversion programs. Finally, it argues that fed- eral, state, and local responses to adolescent substance abuse must tackle defi- ciencies in rural infrastructure, while keeping in mind factors that differentiate rural places from what has become the implicit urban norm in law- and policy- * Professor of Law, University of California, Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Oversight of Intelligence: Background and Selected Options for Further Reform
    Congressional Oversight of Intelligence: Background and Selected Options for Further Reform December 4, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45421 SUMMARY R45421 Congressional Oversight of Intelligence: December 4, 2018 Background and Selected Options for Further Michael E. DeVine Reform Analyst in Intelligence and National Security Prior to the establishment of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) in 1976 and 1977, respectively, Congress did not take much interest in conducting oversight of the Intelligence Community (IC). The Subcommittees on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the congressional Armed Services Committees had nominal oversight responsibility, though Congress generally trusted that IC could more or less regulate itself, conduct activities that complied with the law, were ethical, and shared a common understanding of national security priorities. Media reports in the 1970s of the CIA’s domestic surveillance of Americans opposed to the war in Vietnam, in addition to the agency’s activities relating to national elections in Chile, prompted Congress to change its approach. In 1975, Congress established two select committees to investigate intelligence activities, chaired by Senator Frank Church in the Senate (the “Church Committee”), and Representative Otis Pike in the House (the “Pike Committee”). Following their creation, the Church and Pike committees’ hearings revealed the possible extent of the abuse of authority by the IC and the potential need for permanent committee oversight focused solely on the IC and intelligence activities. SSCI and HPSCI oversight contributed substantially to Congress’s work to legislate improvements to intelligence organization, programs, and processes and it enabled a more structured, routine relationship with intelligence agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Jus Algoritmi: How the NSA Remade Citizenship
    Extended Abstract Jus Algoritmi: How the NSA Remade Citizenship John Cheney-Lippold 1 1 University of Michigan / 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America / [email protected] Introduction It was the summer of 2013, and two discrete events were making analogous waves. First, Italy’s Minister for Integration, Cécile Kyenge was pushing for a change in the country’s citizenship laws. After a decades-long influx of immigrants from Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe, the country’s demographic identity had become multicultural. In the face of growing neo-nationalist fascist movements in Europe, Kyenge pushed for a redefinition of Italian citizenship. She asked the state to abandon its practice of jus sanguinis, or citizenship rights by blood, and to adopt a practice of jus soli, or citizenship rights by landed birth. Second, Edward Snowden fled the United States and leaked to journalists hundreds of thousands of classified documents from the National Security Agency regarding its global surveillance and data mining programs. These materials unearthed the classified specifics of how billions of people’s data and personal details were being recorded and processed by an intergovernmental surveillant assemblage. These two moments are connected by more than time. They are both making radical moves in debates around citizenship, though one is obvious while the other remains furtive. In Italy, this debate is heavily ethnicized and racialized. According to jus sanguinis, to be a legitimate part of the Italian body politic is to have Italian blood running in your veins. Italian meant white. Italian meant ethnic- Italian. Italian meant Catholic.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM/US-984XN Overview
    TOP SFCRF.T//SI//ORCON//NOFORX a msn Hotmail Go« „ paltalk™n- Youffl facebook Gr-iai! AOL b mail & PRISM/US-984XN Overview OR The SIGAD Used Most in NSA Reporting Overview PRISM Collection Manager, S35333 Derived From: NSA/CSSM 1-52 April 20L-3 Dated: 20070108 Declassify On: 20360901 TOP SECRET//SI// ORCON//NOFORN TOP SECRET//SI//ORCON//NOEÛEK ® msnV Hotmail ^ paltalk.com Youi Google Ccnmj<K8t« Be>cnö Wxd6 facebook / ^ AU • GM i! AOL mail ty GOOglC ( TS//SI//NF) Introduction ILS. as World's Telecommunications Backbone Much of the world's communications flow through the U.S. • A target's phone call, e-mail or chat will take the cheapest path, not the physically most direct path - you can't always predict the path. • Your target's communications could easily be flowing into and through the U.S. International Internet Regional Bandwidth Capacity in 2011 Source: Telegeographv Research TOP SECRET//SI// ORCON//NOFORN TOP SECRET//SI//ORCON//NOEQBN Hotmail msn Google ^iïftvgm paltalk™m YouSM) facebook Gm i ¡1 ^ ^ M V^fc i v w*jr ComnuMcatiw Bemm ^mmtmm fcyGooglc AOL & mail  xr^ (TS//SI//NF) FAA702 Operations U « '«PRISM/ -A Two Types of Collection 7 T vv Upstream •Collection of ;ommujai£ations on fiber You Should Use Both PRISM • Collection directly from the servers of these U.S. Service Providers: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube Apple. TOP SECRET//SI//ORCON//NOFORN TOP SECRET//SI//ORCON//NOEÛEK Hotmail ® MM msn Google paltalk.com YOUE f^AVi r/irmiVAlfCcmmjotal«f Rhnnl'MirBe>coo WxdS6 GM i! facebook • ty Google AOL & mail Jk (TS//SI//NF) FAA702 Operations V Lfte 5o/7?: PRISM vs.
    [Show full text]
  • SURVEILLE NSA Paper Based on D2.8 Clean JA V5
    FP7 – SEC- 2011-284725 SURVEILLE Surveillance: Ethical issues, legal limitations, and efficiency Collaborative Project This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 284725 SURVEILLE Paper on Mass Surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States of America Extract from SURVEILLE Deliverable D2.8: Update of D2.7 on the basis of input of other partners. Assessment of surveillance technologies and techniques applied in a terrorism prevention scenario. Due date of deliverable: 31.07.2014 Actual submission date: 29.05.2014 Start date of project: 1.2.2012 Duration: 39 months SURVEILLE WorK PacKage number and lead: WP02 Prof. Tom Sorell Author: Michelle Cayford (TU Delft) SURVEILLE: Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Commission Services) Executive summary • SURVEILLE deliverable D2.8 continues the approach pioneered in SURVEILLE deliverable D2.6 for combining technical, legal and ethical assessments for the use of surveillance technology in realistic serious crime scenarios. The new scenario considered is terrorism prevention by means of Internet monitoring, emulating what is known about signals intelligence agencies’ methods of electronic mass surveillance. The technologies featured and assessed are: the use of a cable splitter off a fiber optic backbone; the use of ‘Phantom Viewer’ software; the use of social networking analysis and the use of ‘Finspy’ equipment installed on targeted computers.
    [Show full text]
  • İSTİHBARATIN TEŞKİLATLANMA Ve YÖNETİM SORUNSALI: A.B.D. ÖRNEĞİ
    T.C. İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ SİYASET BİLİMİ VE KAMU YÖNETİMİ ANABİLİM DALI YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ İSTİHBARATIN TEŞKİLATLANMA ve YÖNETİM SORUNSALI: A.B.D. ÖRNEĞİ Fatih TÜRK 2501110836 TEZ DANIŞMANI DOÇ. DR Pelin Pınar GİRİTLİOĞLU İSTANBUL - 2019 ÖZ İSTİHBARATIN TEŞKİLATLANMA ve YÖNETİM SORUNSALI: A.B.D. ÖRNEĞİ Fatih TÜRK Günümüzde teknolojinin gelişimi ve küreselleşme dünyayı uçtan uca değiştirdi. Toplumlar ve ülkeler birbiri ile etkileşime geçtikçe bireysel özgürlükler ve demokrasi konusunda hassas alanlar giderek artmaktadır. Bu etkileşim ülkelerin güvenliğini ve bireysel özgürlük alanlarınıda etkilemektedir. Bu hızlı değişime karşın ülkeler geçmişin soğuk savaş anlayışı ve güvenlik hassasiyetlerini de aynı zamanda taşımaya devam etmektedirler. Gelişmiş demokrasilere sahip ülkelerin başında gelen Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde (ABD) mevcut güvenlik ve istihbarat anlayışı, faaliyetleri ve denetimi işte bu çatışmanın uzun sürede meydana geldiği denge üzerine kuruludur. ABD açısından istihbarat teşkilatlanma süreci yeni problemler, hak arayışları, çatışma ve çözümler doğurmaktadır. Tüm bunların ışığında bu tezin temel amacı istihbarat problemlerini ABD istihbarat teşkilatlanma süreci üzerinden analiz edip karşılaşılan problemleri neden sonuç ilişkisi içerisinde tespit etmektir. Bu çalışmada Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde istihbaratın yönetim modeli, teşkilatlanması ve hukuki alt yapısı incelenmiştir. Birinci bölümde kavramsal anlamda istihbarat incelemesi literatüre önemli bir katkı olarak görülebilir. İkinci bölümde
    [Show full text]