DOCSLIB.ORG

Bridget Jones's Baby

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bridget Jones's Baby Bridget Jones’s Baby (2016) UK, 11th October 2016. The novel, Fielding says, focuses on Bridget’s “somewhat bumpy 123 mins, Rating - 15 journey into motherhood”. She went on to say, “At heart, Bridget Jones is about the gap Director: Sharon Maguire between how we all feel we’re expected to be Writers: Emma Thompson, Helen Fielding and how we actually are; and - as Bridget (screenplay), Dan Mazer (screenplay) discovers with her somewhat bumpy Stars: Renée Zellweger, Gemma Jones, Jim pregnancy - how we expect life to turn out and Broadbent how it actually does”. Synopsis Bridget Jones’s Baby is the third film in Helen What the Critics said - extracts Fielding’s resplendently resilient comic Wendy Ide - The Observer creation, and a sequel to the 2004 Bridget Excellent physical comedy, and Emma Jones: The Edge of Reason. Forty-something Thompson, as Bridget’s doctor, stands out in and single again, Bridget Jones decides to this third instalment of the series. High points focus on her job as top news producer and include a brilliant piece of physical comedy surround herself with old friends and new. For involving the heavily pregnant Bridget, a once, Bridget has everything completely under revolving door and co-writer Emma Thompson, control. What could possibly go wrong? Then who awards herself most of the best lines in her love life takes a turn and Bridget meets a the film. Low points include a comic dance dashing American named Jack (Patrick sequence to Gangnam Style, a song that Dempsey), the suitor who is everything Mr. should now be outlawed from use in films for Darcy is not. In an unlikely twist she finds the next decade. Or at least until the next herself pregnant, but with one hitch...she can Bridget Jones film. only be fifty percent sure of the identity of her baby's father. Charlotte O’Sullivan - The Evening Standard Sharon Maguire’s direction is merely Background to the film and the novels adequate. The soundtrack is devoid of The third Jones film, in which Bridget is surprises. Ed Sheeran, in a cameo role, working in television news, has been mooted overstays his welcome. So does a set-piece since 2009, and when it was finally time to get involving male bottoms and a frozen computer on set again in front of director Sharon screen. It’s a shame Zellweger’s not quite Maguire, who made the original film, Renée herself, but at least she’s there at the centre of Zellweger prepared by spending time with the the frame (her lovely voice, by the way, is as production crew on ITV’s breakfast show, huskily forceful as ever — her diary-like Good Morning Britain. Texas-born Zellweger musings, which book-end many of the scenes, has said that the stint with ITV also really work beautifully). Yet, incredibly, the film is still helped restore her English accent. worth seeing, partly down to Firth, who somehow gives the priggish Darcy a heartbeat Renee Zellweger has revealed that the actors that makes our own quicken. in the film - including her on-screen love interests Colin Firth and Patrick Dempsey - Cath Clarke - Time Out have filmed a trio of endings to ensure crucial Bridget Jones’s Baby is funny and charming. plot twists are kept top secret. So even the What’s missing is Hugh Grant as Daniel ‘invest Oscar winner doesn't know who is the father of in lockable knickers’ Cleaver. And this being a her beloved character's child. Bridget Jones film, we get an awkward, embarrassing cameo – from Ed Sheeran (a bit Fielding’s debut novel, Bridget Jones’s Diary, budget, guys). Bridget 2.0 is also a bit clean drew upon Fielding’s anonymous column that and wholesome. Let’s have some more filthy she began writing for The Independent in sexual fantasy jokes about Prince Harry next 1995. The book was a global phenomenon time, please. when it was first published in 1996, and together with the 1999 sequel, Bridget Jones: the Edge of Reason, sold more than 15m copies worldwide. Following release of the third film in September 2016, Jonathan Cape published Film notes by Jane Gillon Bridget Jones’s Baby: The Diaries, on .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEARL JAM, BEYONCÉ, ED SHEERAN and COLDPLAY to Headline 2015 GLOBAL CITIZEN FESTIVAL
    PEARL JAM, BEYONCÉ, ED SHEERAN and COLDPLAY to headline 2015 GLOBAL CITIZEN FESTIVAL Free Ticketed Event on the Great Lawn in Central Park on September 26, 2015 msnbc to Simulcast Concert Live on TV and msnbc.com; YouTube to Carry the Livestream; NBC to Broadcast One-Hour Special; iHeartRadio and TIDAL to globally stream concert audio Global Citizens to Call for Support on new Global Goals to Fight Inequality, Protect our Planet and End Extreme Poverty by 2030 Gucci and CHIME FOR CHANGE join as Presenting Partner and Announce Long-Term Partnership with Global Citizen to Drive Equality of Girls and Women New York, NY, July 9, 2015 – Pearl Jam, Beyoncé, Ed Sheeran and Coldplay will headline the 2015 Global Citizen Festival, a free-ticketed event on the Great Lawn in Central Park in New York City on Saturday, September 26, 2015. The Festival is timed to coincide with the launch of the United Nations’ new Global Goals designed to fight inequality, protect our planet and end extreme poverty by 2030. The Global Citizen Festival will channel the power of hundreds of thousands of global citizens lending their voices to achieve policy and financial commitments that will shape the success of these Goals. msnbc will serve as a media partner of the Global Citizen Festival for the second year in a row. The network will air a live simulcast of the full concert on msnbc and msnbc.com. The Festival will be produced by Emmy Award-winning producer, Ken Ehrlich (Grammy Awards). Academy Award-nominated screenwriter Richard Curtis (Bridget Jones's Diary, Love Actually) will produce a one-hour special of the event to air on NBC on Sunday, September 27 and BBC One in the UK on Monday, September 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors Are
    Advisory Board Members Gale Primary Sources: The Independent Digital Archive, 1986-2012 Notable contributors are: Andrew Marr Janet Street-Porter A well-known political journalist and commentator Well-known and often controversial journalist and who hosts a number of influential programmes on broadcaster who edited the Independent on the subject on the BBC. He edited The Sunday from 1999. Independent for a brief period in the 1990s, as well as writing political comments. Rosie Boycott British journalist who founded the feminist William Rees-Mogg magazine Spare Rib in 1971, and later founded A extremely influential journalist, former editor Virago Press, dedicated to women’s writing. She of The Times, and Member of the House of Lords, edited The Independent and the Independent on he was a columnist for The Independent from its Sunday from 1996-1998, and was a leading voice in founding in 1986 until 1992. the newspaper’s campaign to legalise cannabis. Dominic Lawson Tracey Emin A British journalist and former editor of The Sunday Controversial British artist who has written articles Telegraph who wrote columns for The on her works in The Independent. Independent from 2006 to 2013. Helen Fielding Robert Fisk British writer famous for her iconic comic creation The Middle East correspondent for The Bridget Jones, whose famous ‘Diary’ started life as Independent for more than two decades who has a column in The Independent. been ‘International Journalist of the Year’ seven times, he is famous for being one of the few Sebastian Faulks western journalists to remain in Beirut during the British novelist famous for the World War I height of the civil war and for his interviews with drama Birdsong, among others, and for his Osama bin Laden, accounts of which are printed in appearances on TV and radio.
    [Show full text]
  • Books, Bras and Bridget Jones: Reading Adaptions of Pride and Prejudice
    Books, Bras and Bridget Jones: reading adaptions of Pride and Prejudice OLIVIA MURPHY 'Miss Eliza Bennet,' said Miss Bingley, 'despises cards.She is a great reader and has no pleasure in anything else.' 'I deserve neither such praise nor such censure,' cried Elizabeth; 'I am not a great reader, and I have pleasure in many things.'1 At no time in the two hundred years since Jane Austen submitted First Impressions for publication has her work been more popular than in the last decade.2 The phenomenon of Austenmania has seen Sense and Sensibility-a novel that for years struggled for inclusion among Austen's 'mature' fiction3- on the New York Times bestseller list, one hundred and eighty-four years after its first publication.4 The impetus for this sudden explosion in interest in Jane Austen can be traced to one week in September 1995, when ten million people in Britain watched Mr. Darcy dive into his pond at Pemberley.5 Before the end of that year, film versions of Persuasion and Sense and Sensibility would be released and the BBC would immediately replay the entire six-part series of Pride and Prejudice.6 In the following year Clueless would be joined by separate film and television versions of Emma.7 Eventually, Pride and Prejudice would become one of the BBC's (and the American A&E station's) most successful programmes.8 Its popularity brought new readers to Austen's best-known novel, readers who, for the most part, read outside of any academic context. It is these new readings of Pride and Prejudice, however, proliferating in the wake of its adaptation, which contain the greatest significance for our contemporary understanding of Austen, and compel us to examine and re-examine the novel and its adaptations in light of one another.
    [Show full text]
  • A FEMINIST STUDY of POSTMODERN ADAPTATION by MIRANDA MANEY YAGGI (Under the Direction of Roxanne Eberle
    ADAPTIVE CRITICISM: A FEMINIST STUDY OF POSTMODERN ADAPTATION by MIRANDA MANEY YAGGI (Under the Direction of Roxanne Eberle and Anne Williams) ABSTRACT A recent explosion in adaptations of nineteenth-century canonical texts has sparked extreme interest in the academic community, and a great deal of controversy has since ensued regarding the role adaptations play in relation to their original source material. This unprecedented peak in critical attention surrounding adaptation has highlighted the limitations scholarship faces in defining, interpreting, and theorizing about this genre that annexes multiple academic fields. Focusing specifically on adaptations of nineteenth-century women’s writing, I argue that traditional approaches to adaptation are no longer productive for grappling with the vast changes postmodernism has instigated in the genre. Identifying a new trend, which I term “adaptive criticism,” I argue that recent adaptations incorporate scholarship, self-reflexive meditations upon the connection between source material and new creation, and move away from mimetic re-telling to culturally-informed re-invention. INDEX WORDS: Adaptation, Nineteenth-Century Women Writers, Conduct Literature, Gothic, Sex and the City, Bridget Jones’s Diary, The Matrix, Jane Austen, Mary Shelley ADAPTIVE CRITICISM: A FEMINIST STUDY OF POSTMODERN ADAPTATION by MIRANDA MANEY YAGGI Bachelor of Arts, Reinhardt College, 1999 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of Pride and Prejudice Into Film and Television Camila Rojas
    Florida State University Libraries Honors Theses The Division of Undergraduate Studies 2012 From Classic Novel to Popular Culture: The Transformation of Pride and Prejudice into Film and Television Camila Rojas Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] Abstract: (Pride & Prejudice, Literature, Film) This thesis deals with film adaptations of Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. This work examines how this particular novel has been translated into film and the issues that arise from changing media. This study focuses on five different films [Pride and Prejudice (1980), Pride and Prejudice (1995), Pride and Prejudice (2005), Bride and Prejudice (2004) and Bridget Jones’s Diary (2001)] and their relationship to the book and adaptation theory. To provide the reader with a greater understanding of adaptation theory, this thesis will include a section briefly outlining current adaptation studies followed by in-depth analyses of each film in comparison to the novel and theory. THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES FROM CLASSIC NOVEL TO POPULAR CULTURE: THE TRANSFORMATION OF PRIDE AND PREJUDICE INTO FILM AND TELEVISION By CAMILA ROJAS A Thesis submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2012 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Camila Rojas defended on April 18, 2012. ____________________________ Dr. Eric Walker Thesis Director ____________________________ Professor Barbara Hamby Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Valliere Richard Auzenne Outside Committee Member Table of Contents Chapter I. Preface…………………………………………………………………………………..…1 II. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..2 - Adaptation Theory - Pride and Prejudice: Novel III.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study Between Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice And
    A Comparative Study between Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s Diary Erina Yamane This thesis examines the identities of Elizabeth Bennet and Bridget Jones in terms of nationalism, feminism and the familial relationship, by making a comparative study between Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice in the eighteenth century and Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s Diary in the twentieth century. It also clarifies Bridget’s role as a ‘bridge’ in the story. The first chapter analyzes some similarities in terms of plots and some characters, and differences in style and in the role of women, between the two novels. The second chapter surveys Elizabeth and Bridget’s nationalism. Elizabeth’s world looks restricted and narrow; however, its limitation creates her well-defined position as an observer. Nationalism for Elizabeth and Austen is formed by patriotically supporting England in opposition to France. On the other hand, Bridget’s world looks unfixed and varied because of its multiculturalism. Her openness to diverse media ironically emphasizes her limitedness and self-indulgence. Bridget’s attitude toward oriental culture and American culture is caused by her antipathy towards America and ethnic minorities; however, her identity is unbalanced between England and America. She tries to keep her antagonistic identity by satirizing other social classes and fails in her self-establishment because she limitedly uses the concept of“we”. The third chapter examines the heroines in terms of feminism. Elizabeth achieves a triumph over a male and the upper class as a woman in the middle class. Pride and Prejudice is often recognized as a feminist text.
    [Show full text]
  • Women of Substance
    Högskolan Dalarna Degree Thesis EN2012 Supervisor: Carmen Zamorano Llena Examiner: Billy Gray Women of Substance The Aspect of Education, Career and Female Identity in Pride and Prejudice and Bridget Jones’s Diary Fall Term 2009 Johanna Lindgren Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………….….…..1 Elizabeth Bennet – Ahead of Her Time?……………………..………..……4 Bridget Jones – The Austen Heroine of Today…………………...…….…..8 Representation of Women and Female Identity……..……….…….…...….14 Conclusion……………………………………………………..………..…20 Works Cited………………………………………………………..………24 1 Introduction Two women who strive for equality between men and women; two women who both fall in love with a Mr. Darcy; two women who live 250 years apart, but who are more similar than different. There have been many great changes since the eighteenth century and one of the foremost changes during these past two decades that separate us today from the Georgian era is the view on women’s rights to education and work. This essay will look at two popular novels, one from each time, and analyze the differences and similarities in terms of their depiction of female education, work, and career. A complementary, and equally important aim is to discuss the role and depiction of female identity in relation to the education question. The books that make up the centre of this study are Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice published in 1813, purportedly written in 1796-1797, and Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s Diary from 1996. The main focus will lie on the protagonists Elizabeth Bennet from Pride and Prejudice and Bridget Jones from Bridget Jones’s Diary who will be analyzed from a feminist perspective, which can be generally explained by Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary where the definition of feminism is: “the belief and aim that women should have the same rights and opportunities as men [and] the struggle to achieve this aim” (565).
    [Show full text]
  • Have You Met Miss Jones?
    Högskolan Dalarna Degree Thesis (EN2013) Supervisor: Carmen Zamorano Llena Have You Met Miss Jones?: Identity Construction of a Chick Lit Heroine VT09 Towe Falk Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 The Mother-Daughter Relation .................................................................................................. 4 Complexes and Career ............................................................................................................... 9 Identity and Sexuality ............................................................................................................... 13 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 20 Works Cited .............................................................................................................................. 23 1 Introduction Take a random woman in her mid-twenties, with a crazy mother, a lousy job and no sex life, add some insecurity and a lot of alcohol and wrap her up in pink, and congratulations, you have just created your own chick lit heroine: Enter Bridget Jones, who cheerfully announces to her readers her weight of 129 pounds, along with a list of food she has consumed that day, before delving into a single detail of her actual life. Bridget’s resonance with modern women [is] astounding: she humorously [exposes a] list of obsessions as they [lurk]
    [Show full text]
  • Humor and Intertextual Parody in Bridget Jones's
    English Language and Literature DOI:`10.15794/jell.2017.63.2.005 Vol. 63 No. 2 (2017) 263-79 Pride and Pastiche: Humor and Intertextual Parody in Bridget Jones’s Diary* Kenneth Eckert I. Introduction Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s Diary came out in 1996, and some two decades later its scholarly treatment has remained about as thin as the novel’s protagonist endeavors to be. BJD criticism has ranged from super- ficial to a small but hopeful number of instructive readings, and might be usefully parsed into four schools. The first is more fan service than criti- cism, largely gushing over ‘how hot Mark Darcy/Colin Firth is.’ The sec- ond interrogates its disreputable genre affiliation. Part of the difficulty in establishing a critical context for BJD is that whether it deserves to be seri- ously read at all is contested, with some calling it little more than a “decid- edly middlebrow” romance reminiscent of pulp bodice-rippers (Harrison 123). The pejorative chick lit has clung to the novel, with criticism that the genre’s books are as ephemerally consumable and disposable as the shoes and handbags on their covers (Ferriss, Working Girls 177). Maureen Dowd calls the type “all chick and no lit” (qtd. in Davis-Kahl 19), and others crudely dismiss its iterations as bonkbusters (Hurst 459), though some readings do note its fertile proliferation into various cultural forms, such as hen lit (for older females), Chica lit (for Latinas), Sistah lit (for African-Americans), and church lit (for Christian evangelicals) (Ferriss, “Doubleness” 5-6). More divisive has been BJD’s treatment in feminist criticism, which has assessed the novel vis-à-vis its portrayal of Bridget as empowering/hin- dering women’s agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Femininity and Masculinity in Bridget Jones's Diary by Helen Fielding
    Mid Sweden University English Studies Femininity and Masculinity in Bridget Jones’s Diary by Helen Fielding Nadja Beden English C/ Special Project Tutor: Joakim Wrethed 5 June, 2011 1 Table of Contents Introduction …........................................................................ 2 Aim and Approach ………………………………………….. 3 Theoretical Background ………………………………….. 4 Previous Research and Background Material ……………... 6 Analysis 1. Society’s View of Bridget Jones ……………….….. 7 2. Women are Victimized by Marriage …………...…. 11 3. Men too are Powerless ……………………….……. 13 4. Homosexuals too are Powerless …………….……… 16 Conclusion ……………………………………………..…… 18 Work Cited ………………………………………….….…… 19 2 Introduction The Women’s Movement emerged in the late 1960s. However, women started to fight for their rights before the movement emerged. Throughout history, women have been generally oppressed and repressed by the patriarchal society in which men are dominants. They were denied the right to live in the same kind of freedom as men and to get their share of education and career. Instead they were forced to stay at home and raise the family: “Women are born to suffer” (Beauvoir 602). In other words, they were silenced and locked away by the dominating gender. Marriage was considered important for women to ensure their security, but then they were forced to obey their patriarchal husbands without any objection. However, after a long struggle to gain their rights, women virtually succeeded to be treated as equal to men, especially in the western world: “Liberal feminists seek equality of opportunity; though in practice that can mean parity, at various levels, with men. They base their claims on ‘sameness’ or ‘adequate similarity’” (Evans 47). They can now participate actively in various fields of life and enjoy their rights in the same way as men do.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIDGET JONES's BABY by Helen Fielding and Dan Mazer and Emma Thompson
    BRIDGET JONES'S BABY by Helen Fielding and Dan Mazer and Emma Thompson Based on the characters and story created by Helen Fielding FINAL SHOOTING SCRIPT 8th January 2016 © 2016 Universal Studios. All Rights Reserved. SHOOTING SCRIPT. 1 1 OMITTED 1 1A EXT. LONDON. DAY. 1A Sweeping aerial shot of London, establishing the city in all its glory. 1AA EXT. SOUTHWARK BRIDGE. DAY. 1AA We swoop down the Thames to find a svelte figure on the bridge hailing a taxi. 2 INT. CHURCH. DAY 2 SHAZZER, early forties, and her folk singer husband FERGUS, scurry down the aisle. The church is packed with people we might recognise. A few literary and TV celebrities amongst them. Shazzer spots JUDE, now a pillar of married respectability, her husband GILES and their tiny baby. They take the seats beside them. 3 OMITTED 3 4 INT. CHURCH. DAY. 4 BRIDGET JONES enters the church. She’s older than when we last saw her, forty three to be exact, slim and elegantly dressed. She takes a deep breath and collects herself. Bridget spots Jude and Shazzer and heads towards them. Shazzer greets her with a big hug. SHAZZER How are you feeling, you OK? BRIDGET Yes, but I still can’t believe he’s gone. REVEAL - at the front a portrait of DANIEL CLEAVER. ANOTHER REVEAL - The congregation consists mainly of ludicrously attractive, glamorous women, all weeping. BRIDGET (CONT’D) His death seems to have hit the Eastern European teenage modelling community particularly hard. JUDE They found the flight recorder but still no bodies. SHAZZER Yep, in the Australian outback.
    [Show full text]
  • Books, Bras and Bridget Jones: Reading Adaptions of Pride and Prejudice
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals... Books, Bras and Bridget Jones: reading adaptions of Pride and Prejudice OLIVIA MURPHY 'Miss Eliza Bennet,' said Miss Bingley, 'despises cards.She is a great reader and has no pleasure in anything else.' 'I deserve neither such praise nor such censure,' cried Elizabeth; 'I am not a great reader, and I have pleasure in many things.'1 At no time in the two hundred years since Jane Austen submitted First Impressions for publication has her work been more popular than in the last decade.2 The phenomenon of Austenmania has seen Sense and Sensibility-a novel that for years struggled for inclusion among Austen's 'mature' fiction3- on the New York Times bestseller list, one hundred and eighty-four years after its first publication.4 The impetus for this sudden explosion in interest in Jane Austen can be traced to one week in September 1995, when ten million people in Britain watched Mr. Darcy dive into his pond at Pemberley.5 Before the end of that year, film versions of Persuasion and Sense and Sensibility would be released and the BBC would immediately replay the entire six-part series of Pride and Prejudice.6 In the following year Clueless would be joined by separate film and television versions of Emma.7 Eventually, Pride and Prejudice would become one of the BBC's (and the American A&E station's) most successful programmes.8 Its popularity brought new readers to Austen's best-known novel, readers who, for the most part, read outside of any academic context.
    [Show full text]