An Inexpensive Camera Setup for the Study of Egg Predation at Artificial Nests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Inexpensive Camera Setup for the Study of Egg Predation at Artificial Nests J. Field Ornithol., 58(3):372-382 AN INEXPENSIVE CAMERA SETUP FOR THE STUDY OF EGG PREDATION AT ARTIFICIAL NESTS JAROSLAVPICMAN Departmentof Biology Universityof Ottawa 30 Somerset E. Ottawa, Ontario KIN 6N5, Canada Abstract.--Nest predationis an important factor reducingreproductive success of many birds.However, few data are availableon the relativerole of different predators.This paper describesan automaticcamera setup that can be usedto studypredation on artificial nests. Becausethe setup is relatively inexpensive,it shouldallow fieldworkersto conductlarge- scaleinvestigations of nest predation and determineits importanceas a selectiveforce in the evolutionof avian reproductivestrategies. MONTAJEDE CAMARASFOTOGRJ, FICAS EN NIDOS ARTIFICIALES, PARA ESTUDIOS DE DEPREDACI•)N DE HUEVOS Sinopsis.--La depredaci6nen nidoses un factor de importanciaen la reducci6ndel •xito reproductivode muchasaves. Sin embargo,hay pocostrabajos que documentenel rol de diferentesdepredadores. Este trabajo describeel montajede una cfimaraautomfitica que puedeser utilizada para estudiarla depredaci6nen nidos artificiales.Debido a que el montaje cs de bajo costo,esto debe permitirle a los investigadores,11evar a cabo amplios estudiossobre el efectode depredadoresy susimplicaciones en la evoluci6nde estrategias reproductivasde aves. Predation is the most important causeof nestingmortality in many birds (e.g., Murphy 1983, Nilsson 1984, Pageet al. 1985, Ricklefs1969) and has played an important role in the evolutionof avian reproductive strategies(e.g., Crook 1964, Lack 1968). Very little work has beendone, however,to identifyindividual nest predators and determinetheir impact on prey.This is presumablybecause predation events are rarely witnessed and there has not been any inexpensivetechnique available that would allow fieldworkersto effectivelystudy this phenomenonon a larger scale. In 1985 I began a large scalestudy of intensity,type, and temporal and spatial patterns of predation on artificial nestsin different habitats. To record the predation at artificial nests, I designedan inexpensive automatic camera setup, describedhere. DESCRIPTION OF THE CAMERA SETUP To avoiddifficulties associated with the useof battery-operatedflashes and to keep the price of the setup minimal, I selectedan inexpensive camera,the KodakInstamatic X-15F (approximately$17 Cdn). Although the camera'soptics and smallerfilm format(126) resultin onlya moderate quality picture, the advantagesof this camera(flip flashesand low cost) justify its use. The setup consistsof four main components:(1) a nest supportwith trigger mechanism,(2) the Kodak Instamatic cameraX-15F attachedto the support, (3) a clock placed on the support near the nest, and (4) 372 Vol.5a, •o. • CameraSetup for Predation Studies [37 3 FIGURE1. The main componentsof the camerasetup; nest support with triggermechanism (a), camerawith support(b), clock(c), and coversprotecting camera, trigger and clock. The brake cable(d) is connectingthe triggermechanism on nestsupport and the camera shutterlever. Details of individual componentsare shownin Figures 2-4. protectivecovers (Fig. 1). In the following descriptionthe capital letters refer to parts shown on Figures 2-4. The nestsupport and the triggermechanism (Fig. 2).--To the top of a 120 cm long stake(40 x 16 ram; A) I attacheda basket(support for the artificial nest),which I madefrom vinyl-coatedfencing wire (G, H). The attachmentwas achievedby pushingthe two endsof the basketthrough the pre-drilledholes (the samediameter as the wires) in the stakeand bendingthe endsof the wires toward the stake(H). The bottomend of the stakeA is pointedso that it couldbe pushedinto the soil.The trigger mechanismconsists of three parts. An L-shapedwire (B) made of piano wire (diameter1.75 mm) with a large loop (diameter20 ram) at oneend for eggsupport, a small hook at the other end that holdspart C in place when the camerais set up, and a small loop (diameter2 mm) approxi- mately 30 mm from the hookend. The part B is attachedto the support stake A through the small loop with a screw (length 10 mm), which functionsas a hinge.Part C is a short(about 35 mm) straightwire (piano 374] J. Picman J.Field Ornithol. Summer 1987 FIGURE2. Nestsupport, parts of thetrigger mechanism and movement of triggerparts followingdepression of the trigger loop which supports an egg. wire, diameter0.75 mm) with a smallloop (diameter2 mm) at oneend. This part is attachedthrough its loop to the stakeA with a smallscrew (length10 mm), whichalso functions as a hinge,allowing it to rotate freelyaround the screw. The thirdpart is an approximately120 cm long bicyclebrake cable (D). The nestend of the cableis placedin a notch (110 mm long,6 mm wide,4 mm deep;E) madein the stakeA. To hold the cable,a 50 mm longmending plate (F) is attachedto the stake.The vol.58, No. • CameraSetup for Predation Studies [375 116 J • •Jl M FIGURE5. Details of the camerasupport and the attachmentof the brake cable to the camera shutter lever, the top view of the camera base (J) indicatingdimensions and positionof the notchfor the flip flash,and the detail of the cameraend of the brake cable(O) with the compressionspring (M) installed. 376] J. Picman J.Field Ornithol. Summer 1987 brake line at the nest end of the cableis cut off and a small loop is made by twisting the steel wires together.The wire C is then placedthrough this loop.A screwW (length 15 mm) is screwedabout two thirds of the way into the stakeA abovethe top of the mendingplate F (Fig. 2). The function of this screw is to restrict the movement of wire C, therefore preventingit from escapingfrom the brake line loop. The movementof the trigger parts B, C, and D, following the depressionof the loop end of the part B in which the egg is placed,is shownin Figure 2. The camerasupport (Fig. 3) .--The camerasupport consists of two main components,a brake cableattachment and a camerasupport. The camera end of the brake cable is not altered with the exceptionof the addition of the compressionspring (M). The springis constantlyexerting pressure on the cylindricalend of the brake line, pulling it out of the cable(this end of the brake line setsoff the camera).This spring createsconstant downwardpressure on the trigger bar C (Fig. 2) at the nest end of the brake cable. I found it necessaryto glue a small (5 mm diameter and length) plasticcylinder to the shutterlever of the camera.This cylinder housesthe end of the brake line, therebypreventing it from slippingaway from the shutter lever when the trigger is depressed. The woodencamera base (J) is attachedwith two screws(length 40 mm) to the stake P (40 x 16 mm, but 20 cm longer than the supportA in Fig. 2, so that the picture is taken from slightly above). The joint betweenthe two parts (J and P) is further strengthenedby gluing these partstogether with Epoxyglue. The baseJ hasa notchfor the flip flash (seeFig. 5 for dimensionsand positionof this notch on the base). The camera, in an upside down position, is placed on a camera base and attached with several elastic bands. The camera end of the brake cable (O) is then placedin the notch 4 mm deep in the camerabase (Fig. 3) and positionedby tighteningthe wing nut (S) on bolt R (length 60 mm, diameter4 mm), which pressesthe washer (Q) againstthe brake cable. When the brake cable is in the right position,the metal cylinder at the end of the brake line must be pressingagainst the shutter lever of the camera. The clockattachment ('Fig. 4).--To recordthe time of the predation event,I useda battery-operatedclock (Brown AG; Type 4750/AB 3) to which I added an AM/PM indicator (X). This indicator is a thin (1 mm), light disk (Y) cut out of plasticgardening labels, with a small hole (diameterI mm) drilled in its centerand is turned by the passageof the hour hand. The length of the hour hand determinesthe positionand the size of the disk (i.e., the centerof the AM/PM indicator must be located abovethe end of the hour hand). If the hour hand is too long and does not leave enoughspace for the disk, it has to be shortenedslightly. To oneside of the disk I gluedfour dividers(cut out of the gardeninglabels) subdividingthe disk area into four equal fields(Z in Fig. 4). The height of these plastic dividers is determinedby the distanceof the hour and minute handsfrom the faceof the clock(i.e., the dividersshould be slightly higher than the distanceof the hour hand from the face of the clock,but Vol. 58, No. 3 CameraSetup for PredationStudies [377 --y FIGU•.E 4. The clock attachment and the detail of the AM/PM indicator. lower than the distanceof the minute hand from the clock).Two opposite 90ø fields are painted black and the other two white. The disk is then hinged through the hole in the center of the disk to the top part of the clockwith a small nail (diameter 1 mm, length 10 mm, but any excess length that would interfere with the mechanisminside the clockmust be cut off). The AM/PM indicatorhas to be positionedas closeas possible 378] J. Picman J.Field Ornithol. Summer 1987 to the face of the clockbut must be allowed to rotate freely around the nail. The nail is then glued in positionfrom inside the clockwith Instant Krazy Glue ©. Becauseonly the hour hand canrotate the disk,the indicator is rotated every 12 hours by 90ø and the position of the white and black fieldscan be usedto determineAM/PM from the picturesof predation events.The clockis positionedabout 30-40 cm asidefrom the nest. This placementis less likely to result in predatorsstanding in front of the clock. The clock T is attachedwith two elastic bands to the clock support baseU which is hingedthrough the stakeV to the nestsupport A. Hinging the clockattachment to the nestsupport allows collapsingthe clockto the nestsupport stake, making transportationof the setupless awkward. The screwW (length 20 mm), which is screwedabout two thirds of the way into the stakeA, fixes the supportingstake V in a selectedposition.
Recommended publications
  • Predation by Gray Catbird on Brown Thrasher Eggs
    March 2004 Notes 101 PREDATION BY GRAY CATBIRD ON BROWN THRASHER EGGS JAMES W. RIVERS* AND BRETT K. SANDERCOCK Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 (JWR) Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 (BKS) Present address of JWR: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 *Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT The gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) has been documented visiting and breaking the eggs of arti®cial nests, but the implications of such observations are unclear because there is little cost in depredating an undefended nest. During the summer of 2001 at Konza Prairie Bio- logical Station, Kansas, we videotaped a gray catbird that broke and consumed at least 1 egg in a brown thrasher (Toxostoma rufum) nest. Our observation was consistent with egg predation because the catbird consumed the contents of the damaged egg after breaking it. The large difference in body mass suggests that a catbird (37 g) destroying eggs in a thrasher (69 g) nest might risk injury if caught in the act of predation and might explain why egg predation by catbirds has been poorly documented. Our observation indicated that the catbird should be considered as an egg predator of natural nests and that single-egg predation of songbird nests should not be attributed to egg removal by female brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) without additional evidence. RESUMEN El paÂjaro gato gris (Dumetella carolinensis) ha sido documentado visitando y rompien- do los huevos de nidos arti®ciales, pero las implicaciones de dichas observaciones no son claras porque hay poco costo por depredar un nido sin defensa.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts from the 1999 Symposium
    UTAH I THE I DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL ARIZONA NEVADA l I i I / + S v'LEI S % A|. w a CALIFORNIA PROCEEDINGS OF 1999 SYMPOSIUM DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 SYMPOSIUM A compilation of reports and papers presented at the twenty-fourth annual symposium of the Desert Tortoise Council, March 5-8, 1999 St. George, Utah PUBLICATIONS OF THE DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL, INC. Members Non-members Proceedings of the 1976 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1977 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1978 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1979 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1980 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1981 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1982 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1983 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1984 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1985 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1986 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1987-91 Desert Tortoise Council Symposia $20,00 $20.00 Proceedings of the 1992 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1993 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1994 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1995 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1996 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1997-98 Desert Tortoise Council Symposia $10.00 $15.00 Annotated Bibliog raphy of the Desert Tortoise, Gopherus agassizii $10.00 $15.00 Note: Please add $1.00 per copy to cover postage and handling.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Trail Traffic on Egg-Predation by Mammal Populations in the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve
    Effects of trail traffic on egg-predation by mammal populations in the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve. Karmen Scott Department of Environmental Science, University of Oregon ABSTRACT The effects of human traffic within trails on egg predation and predatory mammal compositions between heavily trafficked trails and secluded trails were studied at the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve. This study was able to find differences in egg-predatory mammal compositions between these two trail types by looking at teeth impressions in eggs made of plasticine. The main predator was found to be Nasura narica (common coati) who was involved in the majority of the egg predation events and the vast majority of the nests preyed upon were on the highly trafficked trail. There were only a few predation events from other mammals such as rodents and Cebus capucinus (white-faced monkey). In this case, the abundance of tourists have altered populations of a mesopredator, Nasua narica by providing a new food source for them (garbage and tourist‟s lunches) and by affecting the rarity of their predators (boas, cats and Tayras) whom steer-clear of human populated areas and therefore steer-clear of N. narica. This dualistic relationship acting on the population of N. narica makes for an increase in the carrying capacity and, hence, further predation. This imbalanced egg- predation by N. narica on tourist trails allocates the disruption of their prey populations. Studies of the impacts of tourism have important conservation implications because tourism can have a tremendous disturbance on structure and community function. RESUMEN Los efectos del tráfico humano en la depredación de huevos en los senderos y en las composiciones de las comunidades de mamíferos depredadores entre los senderos con mucho tránsito y los senderos recluidos fueron estudiados en La Reserva del Bosque Nuboso de Monteverde.
    [Show full text]
  • Egg Predation in Reedbed Nesting Greylag Geese Anser Anser in Vejlerne, Denmark
    137 EGG PREDATION IN REEDBED NESTING GREYLAG GEESE ANSER ANSER IN VEJLERNE, DENMARK JENS NYELAND KRISTIANSENl,2 Kristiansen J.N. 1998. Egg predation in reedbed nesting Greylag Geese An­ ser anser in Vejlerne, Denmark. Ardea 86: 137-145. Egg predation in Greylag Geese Anser anser nesting in reedbeds was stud­ ied at three sites in Vejlerne (NW Denmark). Overall, 34% of all clutches hatched successfully (range 26-53%), while at least 34% of all nests were abandoned. Avian predation of clutches was particularly high on one site (20%) compared to other sites (0-2%), probably as a result of better breed­ ing opportunities for crows in that area. Mammalian egg predation was low in the two sites with natural barriers in the form of water channels or with higher vegetation densities. Nests neighbouring depredated nests were more likely to be depredated. An important factor affecting egg predation by mammals was the distance of the nest to reed cutting tracks. Second, there was a tendency for successful nests to occur in areas with higher veg­ etation densities. Mammalian predators were Red Fox Vulpes vulpes and American Mink Mustela vison and/or Western Polecat M. putorius. Key words: Anser anser - egg predation - reedbed - mammalian predators lThe National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Coastal Zone Ecology, Kal¢, Grenavej 12, DK-8410 R¢nde, Denmark; 2University of Copenhagen, Zoological Institute, Department of Population Biology, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark, e-mail: JNKris­ [email protected] INTRODUCTION mammalian predators, or hide their nests in dense vegetation to avoid detection by avian predators. The reproductive output of geese varies greatly This study examined the importance of factors af­ within and between species (Johnson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Perceived Risk in a Small Mesocarnivore, the Bat-Eared
    Quantifying perceived risk in a small mesocarnivore, the bat-eared fox Rebecca Jane Welch Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Zoology and Entomology, in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science at the University of the Free State January 2018 Supervisor: Professor Aliza le Roux, University of the Free State, Qwaqwa Campus General Abstract GENERAL ABSTRACT The perceived risk of predation can induce anti-predator responses such as the spatial and temporal avoidance of predators. However, such responses come with a level of cost that can potentially have implications for fitness – described as ‘non-lethal effects’. While the non-lethal effects of predators on herbivore prey are well investigated, the non-lethal impacts of predators on mesopredators/mesocarnivores are less understood. Importantly, there is reason to expect mesopredators’ anti-predator responses to be greater than those of herbivores, considering that apex predators represent both predation risk and competition. In this thesis, the effects of temporal, spatial, social and anthropogenic factors on the perceived risk of a small mesopredator, the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), were explored using both experimental and observational approaches. The anti-predator behaviours of this species are virtually undescribed and as large predators, e.g. lions (Panthera leo) and spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta), were historically extirpated from the area, it was unclear if anti-predator responses would have disappeared, or still remain. Using giving-up-density (GUD) experiments, I demonstrated that bat-eared foxes experience greater perceived risk in dark conditions and lower perceived risk in the presence of humans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Top Predator Removal on the Distribution of a Mesocarnivore and Nest Survival of an Endangered Shorebird
    VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1, ARTICLE 8 Stantial, M. L., J. B. Cohen, A. J. Darrah, S. L. Farrell and B. Maslo. 2021. The effect of top predator removal on the distribution of a mesocarnivore and nest survival of an endangered shorebird. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 16(1):8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01806-160108 Copyright © 2021 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Research Paper The effect of top predator removal on the distribution of a mesocarnivore and nest survival of an endangered shorebird Michelle L. Stantial 1 , Jonathan B. Cohen 1, Abigail J. Darrah 2, Shannon L. Farrell 1 and Brooke Maslo 3 1Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA, 2Audubon Mississippi, Coastal Bird Stewardship Program, Moss Point, Mississippi, USA, 3Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA ABSTRACT. For trophic systems regulated by top-down processes, top carnivores may determine species composition of lower trophic levels. Removal of top predators could therefore cause a shift in community composition. If predators play a role in limiting the population of endangered prey animals, removing carnivores may have unintended consequences for conservation. Lethal predator removal to benefit prey species is a widely used management strategy. Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) are a common nest predator of threatened piping plovers (Charadrius melodus) and are often the primary target of predator removal programs, yet predation remains the number one cause of piping plover nest loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraspecific Egg Predation by Male Razorfishes (Labridae) During Broadcast Spawning: Filial Cannibalism Or Intra-Pair Parasitism?
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 55(1): 133-141, 1994 CORAL REEF PAPER INTRASPECIFIC EGG PREDATION BY MALE RAZORFISHES (LABRIDAE) DURING BROADCAST SPAWNING: FILIAL CANNIBALISM OR INTRA-PAIR PARASITISM? Simon C. Nemtzov and Eugenie Clark ABSTRACT During field studies, we observed approximately 550 broadcast spawns (sometimes called pelagic spawns), in which pairs release their gametes high in the water column for external fertilization, by three congeneric wrasses: green (Xyrichtys splendens), rosy (X martinicensis) and pearly (X novacula) razorfishes. The released eggs formed a cloud that remained visible for 3-5 s before dissipating. Male X. splendens and X. martinicensis ate ova from the cloud during approximately 40% of their spawns. Male X novacula, and females of all three spe- cies, never ate ova. Our observations show that in fishes, parental care is not a prerequisite for filial cannibalism (the ingestion of one's own offspring), as was previously believed. Analysis of videotaped spawns showed that males were prepared to eat even before comple- tion of the spawning act. We propose that males may control the amount of sperm they release when engaging in spawning rushes. The eating behavior should be adaptive for ter- ritorial male fishes, particularly those with multiple daily spawns (we observed up to 23 spawns per day), because parasitism of nutrients from females (via the ova) may increase the males' chances for future reproduction, consistent with intraspecific predation theory. Filial cannibalism (the ingestion by an animal of its own offspring) seems to conflict with conventional evolutionary theory in that it apparently reduces the parent's fitness. Rohwer (1978) explained that filial cannibalism could be adaptive if a parent achieved higher future reproductive success by lowering its immediate fitness.
    [Show full text]
  • Varphættir Æðarfugls (Somateria Mollissima) Og Afrán Á Hreiðrum Í Breiðafirði
    Varphættir æðarfugls (Somateria mollissima) og afrán á hreiðrum í Breiðafirði Aldís Erna Pálsdóttir Líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild Háskóli Íslands 2016 Varphættir æðarfugls (Somateria mollissima) og afrán á hreiðrum í Breiðafirði Aldís Erna Pálsdóttir 60 eininga ritgerð sem er hluti af Magister Scientiarum gráðu í líffræði Leiðbeinendur Jón Einar Jónsson Róbert Arnar Stefánsson Prófdómari / Fulltrúi deildar Kristinn Haukur Skarphéðinsson Líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið Háskóli Íslands Reykjavík, janúar 2016 Varphættir æðarfugls (Somateria mollissima) og afrán á hreiðrum í Breiðafirði Factors affecting nest predation in common eider in Breidafjördur, West Iceland 60 eininga ritgerð sem er hluti af Magister Scientiarum gráðu í líffræði Höfundarréttur © 2015 Aldís Erna Pálsdóttir Öll réttindi áskilin Líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið Háskóli Íslands Sturlugötu 7 101 Reykjavík Sími: 525 4600 Skráningarupplýsingar: Aldís Erna Pálsdóttir, 2015, Varphættir æðarfugls (Somateria mollissima) og afrán á hreiðrum í Breiðafirði, meistararitgerð, líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild, Háskóli Íslands, 51 bls. Prentun: Háskólaprent Reykjavík, janúarmánuður 2016 Útdráttur Æðardúnn er verðmæt útflutningsvara og dúntekja mikilvæg tekjulind fyrir marga landeigendur. Með því að lágmarka afrán á hreiðrum æðarfugls (Somateria mollissima) má bæta afrakstur og nýtingu dúns. Rannsókn þessi lagði mat á tengsl nokkurra þátta við tíðni afráns og hvaða afræningjar væru mest áberandi í æðarvörpum í fimm eyjum á sunnanverðum Breiðafirði. Þeir þættir sem voru skoðaðir voru umhverfi hreiðurstæðis, upphafsdagsetning álegu, nálægð við varp mögulegra afræningja, skjól hreiðurstæðis, fjöldi eggja í hreiðri og tíðni heimsókna afræningja að hreiðri. Æðarvörp voru heimsótt tvisvar á varptíma, auk þess sem notaðar voru myndavélar búnar hreyfiskynjurum til að fylgjast með hreiðrunum. Af 178 hreiðrum í rannsókninni voru 29 (16%) rænd árin 2014 og 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraguild Predation of Orius Tristicolor by Geocoris Spp. and the Paradox of Irruptive Spider Mite Dynamics in California Cotton
    Biological Control 32 (2005) 172–179 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Intraguild predation of Orius tristicolor by Geocoris spp. and the paradox of irruptive spider mite dynamics in California cotton Jay A. Rosenheim¤ Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States Received 12 May 2004; accepted 15 September 2004 Abstract It is paradoxical when a community of several natural enemies fails to control a pest population when it can be shown experimen- tally that single members of the natural enemy community are eVective control agents when tested individually. This is the case for spider mites, Tetranychus spp., in California cotton. Spider mites exhibit irruptive population dynamics despite that fact that experi- ments have shown that there are at least four predators (Galendromus occidentalis, Frankliniella occidentalis, Orius tristicolor, and Geocoris spp.) that, when tested singly, can suppress mite populations. One possible explanation for the paradox is intraguild preda- tion, wherein one predator consumes another. Here, I evaluate the hypothesis that intraguild predation is a strong interaction among spider mite predators. I report manipulative Weld experiments, focal observations of freely foraging predators in the Weld, and popu- lation survey data that suggest that the minute pirate bug O. tristicolor, is subject to strong predation by other members of the pred- ator community, and in particular by Geocoris spp. These results, combined with the results of prior work, suggest that pervasive intraguild predation among spider mite predators may explain the pest status of Tetranychus spp. in cotton. 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Intraguild predation; Predator–predator interactions; Herbivore population suppression; Spider mites; Orius tristicolor; Geocoris pallens; Geocoris punctipes; Tetranychus spp.; Chrysoperla spp.; Nabis spp.; Zelus renardii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pond Tadpoles with Generalized Morphology: Is It Time to Reconsider Their Functional Roles in Aquatic Communities?
    Oecologia (1999) 120:621±631 Ó Springer-Verlag 1999 James W. Petranka á Caroline A. Kennedy Pond tadpoles with generalized morphology: is it time to reconsider their functional roles in aquatic communities? Received: 30 November 1998 / Accepted: 2 May 1999 Abstract With rare exceptions, anuran larvae have tra- Introduction ditionally been considered to occupy lower trophic levels in aquatic communities where they function as micro- Anuran larvae are important elements of many fresh- phagous suspension feeders. This view is being chal- water communities and have been used extensively in lenged by studies showing that tadpoles with generalized ecological experiments that have examined crowding morphology often function as macrophagous predators. eects, resource competition, food web interactions, and Here, we review the literature concerning macrophagy the role of predators in mediating competitive interac- by tadpoles and provide two additional examples in- tions (Morin 1983; Wilbur 1984, 1987; Hairston 1989; volving generalized tadpoles. In the ®rst, we demon- Resetarits and Bernardo 1998). Tadpoles have also been strate with laboratory and ®eld experiments that wood used extensively in behavioral studies to understand how frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles are major predators of tradeos in foraging and antipredator behaviors aect macroinvertebrates in ponds. In the second, we show community composition and structure along environ- that green frog (R. clamitans) tadpoles can cause cata- mental gradients (Werner and McPeek 1994; Wellborn strophic reproductive failure of the wood frog via egg et al. 1996). predation. These results and data from other studies Except for a small percentage of anuran larvae that challenge the assumption that generalized tadpoles exhibit morphological, dietary, and niche specializa- function as ®lter-feeding omnivores, and question the tions (e.g., Orton 1953; Crump 1983; Lannoo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannibalism and Intraguild Predation in Clupeoids
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 30 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Cannibalism and intraguild predation in clupeoids Edy Valdes Szeinfeld Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Private Bag X2,8012 Rogge Bay, Cape Town and Marine Biology Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, 7700 Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa ABSTRACT. This paper provides empirical data of anchovy egg mortality caused by cannibalism and sardine predation. Rates of anchovy egg mortality during the period 1986 to 1988 averaged ca 0.01 h-I, representing a survival rate of about 55 % over the 60 h incubation period. Some 56 % of 3325 anchovy stomachs and some 88 % of 1225 sardine stomachs in samples collected during the period 1986 to 1988 contained anchovy eggs. Of 750 sardines and anchovies caught in co-habited areas during this period, 67 % of the anchovy and 87 % of the sardine had anchovy eggs in their stomachs. Mean numbers of eggs observed in stomachs per kg of fish mass of the co-occurrent collections were 24 in anchovies and 2117 in sardines. It was estimated that up to 56 % of the total anchovy egg mortality was the result of sardine predation and up to 6 % was the result of anchovy cannibalism Fluctuations in anchovy recruitment and cycles in the abundance of clupeoid species in the Benguela system are hkely to be attributable at least in part to these 2 mechanisms. INTRODUCTION Population stabilization through compensating cannibalism is possible if predator abundance is A guild of planktivorous clupeoid species comprising constant and they have a sigmoid (Type 111) functional the Cape anchovy Engraulis capensis and the South response to prey density (Holling 1959, Murdoch 1969, African pilchard or sardine Sardinops ocellatus is Peterman & Gatto 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Common Tern Egg Predation by Ruddy Turnstones’
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 521 Beach, fall and winter 1938 and 1939. Bird Lore 41: TAYLOR,L. R. 1963. Analysis ofthe effectoftemperature 11-16. of insectsin flight. J. Anim. Ecol. 32:99-l 17. ERSKINE,A. J. 1964. Nest site competition between Buf- TYLER,W. M. 1942. Tree Swallow, p. 384400. In A. flehead, Mountain Bluebird, and Tree Swallows.Can. C. Bent. Life historiesof North American flycatchers, Field-Nat. 93:202-203. larks, swallows,and their allies. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. HERSEY,F. S. 1933. Notes on Tree Swallows and blue- No. 179. birds. Auk 50: 109-l 10. WEATHERHEAD,P. J., S. G. SEALY,AND R.M.R. BARCLAY. HUSSELL,D. T. 1983. Age and plumage color in female 1985. Risks of clusteringin thermally-stressedswal- Tree Swallows. J. Field Omithol. 54:3 12-3 18. lows. Condor 87:443-444. KUERZI, R. G. 1941. Life history studies of the Tree WEBER,J. A. 1940. Destruction of Tree Swallows. Auk Swallow. Proc. Linn. Sot. N. Y. 52-53:1-52. 57:405. LEFFELAAR,D. AND R. J. ROBERTSON.1984. Do male WHITMORE,R. C., J. A. MOSHER,AND H. H. FROST. 1977. Tree Swallows guard their mates? Behav. Ecol. So- Springmigrant mortality during unseasonableweath- ciobiol. 16:73-79. er. Auk 941778-781. SCHAEFFER,F. S. 1972. Tree Swallow breeding biology ZELENY,L. 1976. The bluebird. Indiana Univ. Press, at a coastaland inland area. EBBA News 34:216-222. Bloomington. The Condor 88521-522 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1986 COMMON TERN EGG PREDATION BY RUDDY TURNSTONES’ ANNEFARRAWAY 540 Merton Street, Toronto, ON M4S IB3, Canada KATIETHOMAS 74 ChestnutPark Road, Toronto, ON M4 W 1 W9, Canada HANSBLOKPOEL Canadian Wildlife Service,1725 WoodwardDrive, Ottawa, ON KlA 0E7, Canada Key words: Ruddy Turnstones:Arenaria interpres;terns; as a tumstone devoured the contentsof its nest.
    [Show full text]