Hormonal Signaling in Cnidarians: Do We Understand the Pathways Well Enough to Know Whether They Are Being Disrupted?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hormonal Signaling in Cnidarians: Do We Understand the Pathways Well Enough to Know Whether They Are Being Disrupted? Ecotoxicology (2007) 16:5–13 DOI 10.1007/s10646-006-0121-1 Hormonal signaling in cnidarians: do we understand the pathways well enough to know whether they are being disrupted? Ann M. Tarrant Accepted: 4 October 2006 / Published online: 18 January 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Cnidarians occupy a key evolutionary posi- level, and the potential for signal disruption is largely tion as basal metazoans and are ecologically important unknown. This review considers the state of knowledge as predators, prey and structure-builders. Bioregulato- on hormonal signaling, chemical bioregulation and ry molecules (e.g., amines, peptides and steroids) have signal disruption in cnidarians, focusing particularly on been identified in cnidarians, but cnidarian signaling advances since the publication of the results of the pathways remain poorly characterized. Cnidarians, Endocrine Disruption in Invertebrates: Endocrinology, especially hydras, are regularly used in toxicity testing, Testing and Assessment workshop (deFur et al. 1999). but few studies have used cnidarians in explicit testing for signal disruption. Sublethal endpoints developed in cnidarians include budding, regeneration, gametogen- Why cnidarians: diversity, evolutionary significance esis, mucus production and larval metamorphosis. and ecological role Cnidarian genomic databases, microarrays and other molecular tools are increasingly facilitating mechanis- The phylum Cnidaria contains four extant classes, the tic investigation of signaling pathways and signal Hydrozoa (e.g., hydras), Scyphozoa (‘‘true’’ jellyfishes), disruption. Elucidation of cnidarian signaling processes Cubozoa (box jellies) and Anthozoa (e.g., corals and in a comparative context can provide insight into the anemones). The number of cnidarian species has not evolution and diversification of metazoan bioregula- been rigorously assessed, but is estimated to be around tion. Characterizing signaling and signal disruption in 10,000 (Brusca and Brusca 1990). A definitive cnidar- cnidarians may also provide unique opportunities for ian species inventory is currently being established evaluating risk to valuable marine resources, such as (D.G. Fautin, personal communication, December 30, coral reefs. 2005), and progress to date indicates that the subclass Hexacorallia (that includes anemones and corals) Keywords Bioregulation Á Cnidaria Á Coral Á alone contains 2,899 valid species (Fautin 2005). Endocrine Á Signal disruption Cnidarians are usually classified as basal metazoans that form a sister group to the bilaterians, although these ancient evolutionary relationships are a subject Introduction of active research (Holland 1998; Gro¨ ger and Schmid 2001; Martindale 2005; Rokas et al. 2005). Because of Hormonal signaling in cnidarians has not been fully their basal position and simple organization, it is characterized on either a molecular or a biochemical sometimes assumed that bioregulation of cnidarian physiology must also be simple and that vertebrate features absent from model protostomes (e.g., nema- & A. M. Tarrant ( ) todes and insects) are likely to have evolved after the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Mailstop 32, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA divergence of the protostomes and the deuterostomes. e-mail: [email protected] Somewhat surprisingly, a comparative study indicated 123 6 Tarrant that more than 10% of genes shared between cnida- circulation (Xian et al. 2005). The role of hormonal or rians and humans have apparently been lost from pheromonal signals in regulating jellyfish blooms is model protostomes (Kortschak et al. 2003). Thus, it is unknown. Similarly, it is unknown whether environ- not possible to use conserved features between verte- mental chemicals affect jellyfish signaling and bloom brates and model invertebrates alone to predict the dynamics. complexity of cnidarian signaling processes (Miller Cnidarians also provide three-dimensional structure et al. 2005; Technau et al. 2005). Further, elucidation of to benthic ecosystems, most notably tropical coral cnidarian signaling processes in a comparative context reefs. Reef ecosystems provide habitat for diverse taxa, can provide insight into the evolution and diversifica- protect shorelines and provide commercial and recre- tion of metazoan bioregulation. ational resources for humans. Scleractinian coral biol- In addition to their key evolutionary position, ogy is of particular interest due to the importance of cnidarians are also important as both predators and corals in maintaining tropical reefs and increasing prey in aquatic ecosystems. Gelatinous cnidarians human concerns about reef degradation (Gardner et al. serve as prey for diverse taxa including other cnidari- 2003; Hughes et al. 2003; Pandolfi et al. 2003). The ans, fishes and turtles. While gelatinous cnidarians are chemical signals that regulate coral gametogenesis and sometimes regarded as relatively unpalatable or of low spawning are poorly understood, and it is unknown nutritional value (e.g., Avent et al. 2001), cnidarians whether environmental chemicals may disrupt these may be widely underestimated as prey sources because signals. they tend to be rapidly digested (Arai et al. 2003; Arai 2005). As predators, cnidarians can dramatically change the composition of plankton and may impair Routes of exposure fisheries yield through dietary overlap and direct predation (Arai 1988; Purcell and Arai 2001; Purcell Cnidarians may be exposed to chemicals through and Sturdevant 2001). As an example, the hydroid, uptake of dissolved compounds, ingestion of food Clytia gracilis, can remove up to 40% of copepod particles, or contact with suspended solids and sedi- nauplii daily production in a region of the Georges ments. The relative importance of these routes of Bank (Atlantic coast of the United States, Madin et al. exposure varies with life history parameters, particu- 1996). Copepod nauplii are a primary food source for larly habitat and mode of nutrition. Adult cnidarians larval cod and haddock, so hydroids can significantly may be benthic or pelagic, cnidarian gametes may be reduce food availability and may also prey directly on brooded or spawned, and larvae spend varying times the larval fish (Madin et al. 1996). Suspension-feeding (hours to months) in the water column. Cnidarians may benthic cnidarians also impact planktonic composition be entirely carnivorous or may contain algal symbionts and may play an important role in benthic–pelagic that fill some or all of their energetic needs. Exposure coupling. For example, a Mediterranean gorgonian was of scleractinian corals to chemicals is of particular found to consume large numbers of eggs and inverte- concern because reef ecosystems are often located near brate larvae, particularly larval bivalves, with unknown highly populated coasts and may be exposed to effects on bivalve recruitment and population dynam- contaminants through riverine input, sewage effluent, ics (Rossi et al. 2004). run-off, groundwater discharge, marine activities and Jellyfish (medusae, which may be hydrozoan, spills (reviewed by Peters et al. 1997). scyphozoan or cubozoan) aggregations or blooms are Cnidarians can take up dissolved chemicals through common episodic events, and the frequency and extent diffusion. The freshwater Hydra spp. are commonly of blooms may be increasing (Mills 2001). Jellyfish used (Blaise and Kusui 1997; Holdway et al. 2001; blooms can have major ecological consequences. For Pascoe et al. 2003) and other cnidarians are occasion- example, an exotic jellyfish recently accounted for 98% ally used (e.g., anemones Mercier et al. 1997; colonial of total fisheries sampling in the Yangtze estuary in hydroids Chicu et al. 2000) in toxicity testing with China (summarized by Xian et al. 2005). Jellyfish dissolved contaminants. One explanation for the blooms are caused and maintained by a combination of observed sensitivity of hydras to a range of chemicals physical and poorly understood behavioral and phys- is their diploblastic organization, which allows all cells iological processes (Lotan et al. 1994; Purcell et al. potentially to be exposed to the surrounding medium 2000; Graham et al. 2001; Lucas 2001). Jellyfish blooms and associated contaminants (Ingersoll et al. 1999). may also be aggravated by anthropogenic factors (Mills Similarly, Peters et al. (1997) suggested that reef- 2001) including overfishing of competitors (Brodeur building corals might be particularly sensitive to et al. 2002), eutrophication and changes in estuarine lipophilic contaminants because corals typically 123 Hormonal signaling in cnidarians 7 possess thin lipid-rich tissues, facilitating direct uptake. determine whether accumulated lipophilic contami- Incubations with radiolabeled compounds have dem- nants are mobilized during spawning events. In addi- onstrated that corals can remove estrogens (Tarrant tion to organic chemicals, heavy metals can also et al. 2001), petroleum hydrocarbons (Solbakken et al. accumulate in cnidarian tissues (Mitchelmore et al. 1984), and benzo [a]pyrene (Kennedy et al. 1992) from 2003) and can be transferred up the food chain. For the surrounding seawater. example, high levels of cadmium and other metals in Few studies have examined the bioavailability of leatherback turtles are thought to be derived from particle-associated contaminants to cnidarians. Harter their jellyfish prey (Caurant et al. 1999). and Matthews (2005) suggested that the burrowing anemone Nematostella vectensis could be used in sediment toxicity testing.
Recommended publications
  • Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (2012)
    FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee June, 2012 Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard, June 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Application ............................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Previous FGDC Standards .............................................................. 4 1.6 Development Procedures ......................................................................................... 5 1.7 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 Build a Scientifically Sound Ecological Classification .................................... 7 1.7.2 Meet the Needs of a Wide Range of Users ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of CITES Listed Coral Species Part II
    CoP16 Doc. 43.1 (Rev. 1) Annex 5.2 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of CITES listed Coral Species Part II CORAL SPECIES AND SYNONYMS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED IN THE UNEP‐WCMC DATABASE 1. Scleractinia families Family Name Accepted Name Species Author Nomenclature Reference Synonyms ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrolhosensis Veron, 1985 Veron (2000) Madrepora crassa Milne Edwards & Haime, 1860; ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrotanoides (Lamarck, 1816) Veron (2000) Madrepora abrotanoides Lamarck, 1816; Acropora mangarevensis Vaughan, 1906 ACROPORIDAE Acropora aculeus (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora aculeus Dana, 1846 Madrepora acuminata Verrill, 1864; Madrepora diffusa ACROPORIDAE Acropora acuminata (Verrill, 1864) Veron (2000) Verrill, 1864; Acropora diffusa (Verrill, 1864); Madrepora nigra Brook, 1892 ACROPORIDAE Acropora akajimensis Veron, 1990 Veron (2000) Madrepora coronata Brook, 1892; Madrepora ACROPORIDAE Acropora anthocercis (Brook, 1893) Veron (2000) anthocercis Brook, 1893 ACROPORIDAE Acropora arabensis Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora aspera Dana, 1846; Acropora cribripora (Dana, 1846); Madrepora cribripora Dana, 1846; Acropora manni (Quelch, 1886); Madrepora manni ACROPORIDAE Acropora aspera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Quelch, 1886; Acropora hebes (Dana, 1846); Madrepora hebes Dana, 1846; Acropora yaeyamaensis Eguchi & Shirai, 1977 ACROPORIDAE Acropora austera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora austera Dana, 1846 ACROPORIDAE Acropora awi Wallace & Wolstenholme, 1998 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora azurea Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora batunai Wallace, 1997 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bifurcata Nemenzo, 1971 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora branchi Riegl, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora brueggemanni Brook, 1891; Isopora ACROPORIDAE Acropora brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) Veron (2000) brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bushyensis Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) Acropora fasciculare Latypov, 1992 ACROPORIDAE Acropora cardenae Wells, 1985 Veron (2000) CoP16 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes
    SCLERACTINIAN REEF CORALS: IDENTIFICATION NOTES By JACKIE WOLSTENHOLME James Cook University AUGUST 2004 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes by Jackie Wolstenholme is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 2 FAMILY ACROPORIDAE.................................................................................................................................... 3 Montipora ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & tuberculae/papillae ................................................................................... 3 Montipora monasteriata .............................................................................................................................. 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & papillae ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioluminescence and Fluorescence of Three Sea Pens in the North-West
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.08.416396; this version posted December 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bioluminescence and fluorescence of three sea pens in the north-west Mediterranean sea Warren R Francis* 1, Ana¨ısSire de Vilar 1 1: Dept of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Bioluminescence of Mediterranean sea pens has been known for a long time, but basic parameters such as the emission spectra are unknown. Here we examined bioluminescence in three species of Pennatulacea, Pennatula rubra, Pteroeides griseum, and Veretillum cynomorium. Following dark adaptation, all three species could easily be stimulated to produce green light. All species were also fluorescent, with bioluminescence being produced at the same sites as the fluorescence. The shape of the fluorescence spectra indicates the presence of a GFP closely associated with light production, as seen in Renilla. Our videos show that light proceeds as waves along the colony from the point of stimulation for all three species, as observed in many other octocorals. Features of their bioluminescence are strongly suggestive of a \burglar alarm" function. Introduction Bioluminescence is the production of light by living organisms, and is extremely common in the marine environment [Haddock et al., 2010, Martini et al., 2019]. Within the phylum Cnidaria, biolumiescence is widely observed among the Medusazoa (true jellyfish and kin), but also among the Octocorallia, and especially the Pennatulacea (sea pens).
    [Show full text]
  • Articles in the Short to Medium Term (Grottoli Et Al
    Proceedings Effects of Ocean Acidification on Bleaching, Survival, and Cal- cification of Porites porites and P. astreoides in Cartagena, Co- lombia † Roy David González-Güeto 1, Lina M. Barrios 2,* and Gabriel R. Navas-S 3 1 Universidad de Cartagena, Maestría en Ciencias Ambientales, Campus San Pablo, Zaragocilla, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Manchester Metropolitan University, Faculty of Sciences and Engineering, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK 3 Universidad de Cartagena, Programa de Biología, Campus San Pablo, Zaragocilla, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Tel: +44-16-1247-1406 † Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biological Diversity, Ecology and Evolution, 15– 31 March 2021; Available online: https://bdee2021.sciforum.net/. Abstract: Estimations of the ocean acidification-OA effects on marine environments indicate that coral reefs’ structure will collapse. This study aimed to determine the effects of OA, and its associ- ated carbon chemistry in the sea water, on corals near the Colombian Caribbean city of Cartagena, taking as model organisms of the species Porites astreoides and P. porites. For each species, the effect of OA on bleaching, survival, and calcification was determined using artificial systems with pH of 7.879 ± 0.004 and 7.789 ± 0.007. The results showed that under the first pH, the bleaching of P. astre- oides increased by 24.92% and its survival decreased by 80.56%, while at lowest pH, bleaching in- creased in 32.78% and survival decreased by 87.5%. In the case of P. porites, at first pH bleaching increased by 29.42% and survival decreased by 30.56% and at the lowest, bleaching increased in Citation: González-Güeto, R.D.; Ba- 37.32% and survival decreased by 13.39%.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Invertebrate Population Attributes
    APPENDIX C - INVERTEBRATE POPULATION ATTRIBUTES C1. Taxonomic list of megabenthic invertebrate species collected C2. Percent area of megabenthic invertebrate species by subpopulation C3. Abundance of megabenthic invertebrate species by subpopulation C4. Biomass of megabenthic invertebrate species by subpopulation C- 1 C1. Taxonomic list of megabenthic invertebrate species collected on the southern California shelf and upper slope at depths of 2-476m, July-October 2003. Taxon/Species Author Common Name PORIFERA CALCEREA --SCYCETTIDA Amphoriscidae Leucilla nuttingi (Urban 1902) urn sponge HEXACTINELLIDA --HEXACTINOSA Aphrocallistidae Aphrocallistes vastus Schulze 1887 cloud sponge DEMOSPONGIAE Porifera sp SD2 "sponge" Porifera sp SD4 "sponge" Porifera sp SD5 "sponge" Porifera sp SD15 "sponge" Porifera sp SD16 "sponge" --SPIROPHORIDA Tetillidae Tetilla arb de Laubenfels 1930 gray puffball sponge --HADROMERIDA Suberitidae Suberites suberea (Johnson 1842) hermitcrab sponge Tethyidae Tethya californiana (= aurantium ) de Laubenfels 1932 orange ball sponge CNIDARIA HYDROZOA --ATHECATAE Tubulariidae Tubularia crocea (L. Agassiz 1862) pink-mouth hydroid --THECATAE Aglaopheniidae Aglaophenia sp "hydroid" Plumulariidae Plumularia sp "seabristle" Sertulariidae Abietinaria sp "hydroid" --SIPHONOPHORA Rhodaliidae Dromalia alexandri Bigelow 1911 sea dandelion ANTHOZOA --ALCYONACEA Clavulariidae Telesto californica Kükenthal 1913 "soft coral" Telesto nuttingi Kükenthal 1913 "anemone" Gorgoniidae Adelogorgia phyllosclera Bayer 1958 orange gorgonian Eugorgia
    [Show full text]
  • Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans
    biology Review Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans Maria Giovanna Parisi 1,* , Daniela Parrinello 1, Loredana Stabili 2 and Matteo Cammarata 1,* 1 Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.G.P.); [email protected] (M.C.) Received: 10 August 2020; Accepted: 4 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: Anthozoa is the most specious class of the phylum Cnidaria that is phylogenetically basal within the Metazoa. It is an interesting group for studying the evolution of mutualisms and immunity, for despite their morphological simplicity, Anthozoans are unexpectedly immunologically complex, with large genomes and gene families similar to those of the Bilateria. Evidence indicates that the Anthozoan innate immune system is not only involved in the disruption of harmful microorganisms, but is also crucial in structuring tissue-associated microbial communities that are essential components of the cnidarian holobiont and useful to the animal’s health for several functions including metabolism, immune defense, development, and behavior. Here, we report on the current state of the art of Anthozoan immunity. Like other invertebrates, Anthozoans possess immune mechanisms based on self/non-self-recognition. Although lacking adaptive immunity, they use a diverse repertoire of immune receptor signaling pathways (PRRs) to recognize a broad array of conserved microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMP). The intracellular signaling cascades lead to gene transcription up to endpoints of release of molecules that kill the pathogens, defend the self by maintaining homeostasis, and modulate the wound repair process.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses of Branching Reef Corals Acropora Digitifera and Montipora
    Responses of branching reef corals Acropora digitifera and Montipora digitata to elevated temperature and pCO2 Cristiana Manullang1, Intan Herwindra Millyaningrum1, Akira Iguchi2, Aika Miyagi3, Yasuaki Tanaka4, Yukihiro Nojiri5,6 and Kazuhiko Sakai7 1 Graduate School of Engineering and Science, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan 2 Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 3 Department of Bioresources Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Okinawa College, Nago-City, Ok- inawa, Japan 4 Environmental and Life Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam 5 Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 6 Graduate School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan 7 Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Motobu, Okinawa, Japan ABSTRACT Anthropogenic emission of CO2 into the atmosphere has been increasing exponentially, causing ocean acidification (OA) and ocean warming (OW). The ``business-as-usual'' scenario predicts that the atmospheric concentration of CO2 may exceed 1,000 matm and seawater temperature may increase by up to 3 ◦C by the end of the 21st century. Increases in OA and OW may negatively affect the growth and survival of reef corals. In the present study, we separately examined the effects of OW and OA on the corals Acropora digitifera and Montipora digitata, which are dominant
    [Show full text]
  • Scleractinia Fauna of Taiwan I
    Scleractinia Fauna of Taiwan I. The Complex Group 台灣石珊瑚誌 I. 複雜類群 Chang-feng Dai and Sharon Horng Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University Published by National Taiwan University, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan Table of Contents Scleractinia Fauna of Taiwan ................................................................................................1 General Introduction ........................................................................................................1 Historical Review .............................................................................................................1 Basics for Coral Taxonomy ..............................................................................................4 Taxonomic Framework and Phylogeny ........................................................................... 9 Family Acroporidae ............................................................................................................ 15 Montipora ...................................................................................................................... 17 Acropora ........................................................................................................................ 47 Anacropora .................................................................................................................... 95 Isopora ...........................................................................................................................96 Astreopora ......................................................................................................................99
    [Show full text]
  • Retinoic Acid and Nitric Oxide Promote Cell Proliferation and Differentially Induce Neuronal Differentiation in Vitro in the Cnidarian Renilla Koellikeri
    Retinoic Acid and Nitric Oxide Promote Cell Proliferation and Differentially Induce Neuronal Differentiation In Vitro in the Cnidarian Renilla koellikeri Djoyce Estephane, Michel Anctil De´ partement de sciences biologiques and Centre de recherche en sciences neurologiques, Universite´ de Montre´ al, Case postale 6128, Succursale Centre-ville, Montre´ al, Que´ bec, Canada, H3C 3J7 Received 26 January 2010; revised 8 July 2010; accepted 9 July 2010 ABSTRACT: Retinoic acid (RA) and nitric oxide cell density. NO donors also induce cell proliferation in (NO) are known to promote neuronal development in polylysine-coated dishes, but induce neuronal differen- both vertebrates and invertebrates. Retinoic acid tiation and neurite outgrowth in uncoated dishes. No receptors appear to be present in cnidarians and NO other cell type undergoes differentiation in the pres- plays various physiological roles in several cnidarians, ence of NO. These observations suggest that in the sea but there is as yet no evidence that these agents have a pansy (1) cell adhesion promotes proliferation without role in neural development in this basal metazoan phy- morphogenesis and this proliferation is modulated pos- lum. We used primary cultures of cells from the sea itively by 9-cis RA and NO, (2) 9-cis RA and NO differ- pansy Renilla koellikeri to investigate the involvement entially induce neuronal differentiation in nonadherent of these signaling molecules in cnidarian cell differen- cells while repressing proliferation, and (3) the involve- tiation. We found that 9-cis RA induce cell prolifera- ment of RA and NO in neuronal differentiation tion in dose- and time-dependent manners in dishes appeared early during the evolutionary emergence of coated with polylysine from the onset of culture.
    [Show full text]