DOCSLIB.ORG

Edifice of Fluvial Terrace Flights, Stacks and Rows

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edifice of Fluvial Terrace Flights, Stacks and Rows geosciences Article Edifice of Fluvial Terrace Flights, Stacks and Rows Wolfgang Schirmer Former Department of Geology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Wolkenstein 24, D-91320 Ebermannstadt, Germany; [email protected]; Tel.: +49-9194-724772 Received: 31 August 2020; Accepted: 8 December 2020; Published: 15 December 2020 Abstract: The paper presents a review of the architecture and structures of river deposits in valleys. A new terminology for some features is included in this review. It presents principles of the fluvial systems with morphological river terraces and fluments (new term for terrace bodies), different stages of the morphological terraces, the texture—the arrangement—of fluments in the form of terrace flights, terrace stacks and terrace rows, and the (inner) structure of a single flument. The contact between the valley fill and the bedrock is named by the new term “pelma”. Special topics deal with flument overlaps and insight into the deepest valley fill down to the bedrock. A comparison with other terms of the fluvial inventory is annexed. Keywords: river terrace; flument (terrace body); pelma (contact flument/bedrock); terrace flight; terrace row; flument stack; flument overlap; valley underground 1. Introduction This paper highlights frequent as well as rare situations derived from constructing terrace flights, terrace rows and flument stacks. River terrace flights, stacks and rows are well known and described in detail, e.g., [1–20]. In supplement to these papers, the following explanations separate morphological river terraces and fluments as terrace bodies, highlight texture (arrangement) of terrace flights, terrace stacks and terrace rows, and highlight problems of flument overlap and of the study of the deepest valley fill down to the bedrock. It emphasizes the (inner) structure of the fluments as tools for recognizing single flument portions. Fluments and terraces always are indicated by a name and not numbered, as already stressed by Howard [21,22]. As the focus in this text is given to the architecture of the elements of the valley, only sometimes their genesis, e.g., [23–27], and age determination, e.g., [28,29], are mentioned marginally. In the later part of the paper, selected examples besides the general explanations relate to the Upper Main region in south-eastern Germany (Figure1). The selection in Central Europe or sometimes in the Rhine–Main River area gives the results a regional character. In comparison to other visited or studied areas in the world, though, e.g., North America or the Orient [30–32], many common features turned out to fit into the given schemes. Geosciences 2020, 10, 501; doi:10.3390/geosciences10120501 www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences Geosciences 2020, 10, 501 2 of 22 Geosciences 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 23 Figure 1. Location map of the UpperUpper MainMain areaarea/Bavaria./Bavaria. Inset: Map of Germany. Black rectanglerectangle == location of this map. Violet: Uplift Uplift area area of the the Rhenish Shield. Green Green area: area: Upper Upper Rhine Rhine graben. graben. 2. Materials Materials and and Methods Methods The followingfollowing report report results results from from extended extended and and long long fieldwork fieldwork along riversalong inrivers the Alpine in the foreland, Alpine foreland,the central the upland central and upland the northern and the lowland northern of Central lowland Europe, of Central North Europe, America, North and Mesopotamia. America, and Mesopotamia.The investigation includes: Mapping in scale 1: 5000, 1: 25,000, separation of morphological terraces,The andinvestigation investigation includes: of their Mapping pedological in properties,scale 1: 5000, including 1: 25,000, pedochemical separation properties. of morphological Study of terraces,the vertical and structure, investigation from of thetheir highest pedological fluvial properties, deposits downincluding to the pedochemical very valley properties. underground Study at ofthe the bedrock, vertical is structure, done case from by casethe highest using grain fluvial size deposits separation down of to gravel, the very sand valley and underground fines, chemical at 14 theproperties bedrock, (carbonate, is done case organic by case carbon, using phosphorus, grain size heavy separation metals), of datinggravel, bysandC, and dendrochronology, fines, chemical propertiespollen analysis, (carbonate, and archaeological organic carbon, and phosphorus, historical heavy materials. metals), The dating Main by River 14C, dendrochronology, valley in southern pollenGermany, analysis, to which and the archaeological focus is frequently and givenhistorical here, materials. gave the mostThe completeMain River insight. valley From in southern all these Germany,studies resulted to which the the general focus insights is frequently into the given fluvial here, valley gave edifices the most presented complete in insight. the following. From all these studies resulted the general insights into the fluvial valley edifices presented in the following. 3. Principles of Flument Systems 3.3.1. Principles Flument and of Flument Terrace Systems 3.1. FlumentPenck [and33] triedTerrace to separate the morphological “terrace” from the sedimentological “gravel”, but used the term terrace for both facts. In this way it is often used until today. Boesch [34] points to the Penck [33] tried to separate the morphological “terrace” from the sedimentological “gravel”, but fact that the accumulation body and its topping terrace are mostly not of the same age. Leopold et al. [35] used the term terrace for both facts. In this way it is often used until today. Boesch [34] points to the (p. 460) state that the sedimentary deposit of a terrace “should more properly be referred to as a fill, fact that the accumulation body and its topping terrace are mostly not of the same age. Leopold et al. alluvial fill, or alluvial deposit, in order to differentiate it from the topographic form”. [35] (p. 460) state that the sedimentary deposit of a terrace “should more properly be referred to as a Thus, here a distinction is drawn between the sedimentary body and its morphological surface, fill, alluvial fill, or alluvial deposit, in order to differentiate it from the topographic form”. called terrace. The river deposit is called flument (from Latin flumen = river, stream), a term newly Thus, here a distinction is drawn between the sedimentary body and its morphological surface, introduced [14] (p. 135). As shown in Figure2, the structure of the flument in its best preservation shows: called terrace. The river deposit is called flument (from Latin flumen = river, stream), a term newly basal lag layer, channel deposit, floodplain deposit and floodplain soil. This is a frequent example of introduced [14] (p. 135). As shown in Figure 2, the structure of the flument in its best preservation the flument structure among many other possibilities. The flument is topped morphologically by the shows: basal lag layer, channel deposit, floodplain deposit and floodplain soil. This is a frequent river terrace that is a mere surface feature. example of the flument structure among many other possibilities. The flument is topped morphologically by the river terrace that is a mere surface feature. Geosciences 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 23 GeosciencesGeosciences2020 2020, 10, 10, 501, x FOR PEER REVIEW 33 of of 22 23 Figure 2. Flument structures. A complete flument is composed of all members of the fluviatile series. Figure 2. Flument structures. A complete flument is composed of all members of the fluviatile series. TheFigure skeleton 2. Flument gravel isstructures. marked by A blackcomplete pebbles flument in all is figures composed of this of allpaper. members of the fluviatile series. The skeleton gravel is marked by black pebbles in all figures of this paper. The skeleton gravel is marked by black pebbles in all figures of this paper. In case the flument rests upon the bedrock the contact between the flument and the bedrock is In case the flument rests upon the bedrock the contact between the flument and the bedrock is called Inpelma case (fromthe flument Greek restspélma upon = sole), the a bedrock term introduced the contact recently between [15] the (p. flument 70) (Figure and 3).the The bedrock basal is called pelma (from Greek pélma = sole), a term introduced recently [15] (p. 70) (Figure3). The basal bedrockcalled pelmacontact (from is the Greekground pélma pelma, = sole), and the a term lateral introduced bedrock contact recently is [15]the wall(p. 70) pelma. (Figure Ground 3). The pelma basal bedrock contact is the ground pelma, and the lateral bedrock contact is the wall pelma. Ground pelma hasbedrock a certain contact affinity is the to ground the term pelma, “strath”: and the it lateraldoes not bedrock conform contact to strath is the wallsensu, pelma. Bucher’s Ground original pelma has a certain affinity to the term “strath”: it does not conform to strath sensu, Bucher’s original definitionhas a certain [36]. Theaffinity term to is thediscussed term “strath”: by various it doesredefinitions, not conform e.g., [21,26,37]to strath (seesensu, Chapter Bucher’s 7). original definition [36]. The term is discussed by various redefinitions, e.g., [21,26,37] (see Section7). definition [36]. The term is discussed by various redefinitions, e.g., [21,26,37] (see Chapter 7). Figure 3. Ortho-terrace and pelma: A complete flument is bounded on top by the ortho-terrace as Figure 3. Ortho‐terrace and pelma: A complete flument is bounded on top by the ortho‐terrace as tread, at the basal bedrock contact by the ground pelma, and at the lateral bedrock contact by the wall tread,Figure at the3. Orthobasal ‐bedrockterrace andcontact pelma: by the A groundcomplete pelma, flument and is at bounded the lateral on bedrock top by contactthe ortho by‐ theterrace wall as pelma. (The flument exemplarily is figured as V-flument). pelma.tread, (The at the flument basal bedrock exemplarily contact is figuredby the ground as V‐flument). pelma, and at the lateral bedrock contact by the wall pelma. (The flument exemplarily is figured as V‐flument).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Origin of the Mitchell Plain in South-Central Indiana 1 Richard L. Powell, Indiana Geological Survey The pre-karst surface of the southern part of the Mitchell Plain was leveled by surface streams of late Tertiary age that headed on the plain or within the Norman Upland and flowed through re-entrant valleys in the Crawford Upland into the pre-Pleistocene Ohio River. The karst features and subterranean drainage characteristic of the Mitchell Plain developed as a lower base level was established by rejuvenation during the late Tertiary or early Pleistocene. These ancient stream routes were first noticed on the Corydon West, Depauw, Fredericksburg, Hardinsburg, Leavenworth, Mauckport, Milltown, and New Amsterdam topographic quadrangles, which cover part of the Mitchell Plain and the Crawford Upland. The ancient stream courses are represented by three kinds of topographic features which are well shown on these maps : hanging dry valleys, bedrock terraces, and abandoned meander loops. The topographic features were checked on aerial photographs and in the field to determine their geologic characteristics. The fossil drainage system studied occupies part of the present drainage basins of Blue River, Indian Creek, and Buck Creek, which are tributaries of the Ohio River (fig. 1). This combined drainage area Figure 1. Map of south-central Indiana showing- the location of drainage features. includes approximately 900 square miles mostly in Crawford, Harrison, and Washington Counties. This drainage basin includes parts of three physiographic units: the Norman Upland, the Mitchell Plain, and the Crawford Upland (2). The Norman Upland is upheld by resistant shales and siltstones of early Mississippian age, which form an eastward facing cuesta that is called the Knobstone Escarpment.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphometric Delineation of Floodplains and Terraces From
    Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 369–385, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-369-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Geomorphometric delineation of floodplains and terraces from objectively defined topographic thresholds Fiona J. Clubb1, Simon M. Mudd1, David T. Milodowski2, Declan A. Valters3, Louise J. Slater4, Martin D. Hurst5, and Ajay B. Limaye6 1School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK 2School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, King’s Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JN, UK 3School of Earth, Atmospheric, and Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 4Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK 5School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, East Quadrangle, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK 6Department of Earth Sciences and St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA Correspondence to: Fiona J. Clubb ([email protected]) Received: 31 March 2017 – Discussion started: 12 April 2017 Revised: 26 May 2017 – Accepted: 9 June 2017 – Published: 10 July 2017 Abstract. Floodplain and terrace features can provide information about current and past fluvial processes, including channel response to varying discharge and sediment flux, sediment storage, and the climatic or tectonic history of a catchment. Previous methods of identifying floodplain and terraces from digital elevation models (DEMs) tend to be semi-automated, requiring the input of independent datasets or manual editing by the user. In this study we present a new method of identifying floodplain and terrace features based on two thresholds: local gradient, and elevation compared to the nearest channel.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Site Assessment
    Site Assessment 55.1 Collecting Site Data 5.2 Analyzing and Interpreting Site Data 5.3 Project Site Risk Assessment 5.4 Document Key Design Considerations and Recommendations 5.5 Reference Reach: The Pattern for Stream- Simulation Design Stream Simulation Steps and Considerations in Site Assessment Sketch a planview map Topographic survey l Site and road topography. l Channel longitudinal profile. l Channel and flood-plain cross sections. Measure size and observe arrangement of bed materials l Pebble count or bulk sample. l Bed mobility and armoring. l Bed structure type and stability (steps, bars, key features). Describe bank characteristics and stability Conduct preliminary geotechnical investigation l Bedrock. l Soils. l Engineering properties. l Mass wasting. l Ground water. Analyze and interpret site data l Bed material size and mobility. l Cross section analysis. Flood-plain conveyance. Bank stability. Lateral adjustment potential. l Longitudinal profile analysis. Vertical adjustment potential. l General channel stability. Document key design considerations and recommendations. RESULTS Geomorphic characterization of reach. Engineering site plan map for design. Understanding of site risk factors and potential channel changes over structure lifetime. Detailed project objectives, including extent and objectives of any channel restoration. Design template for simulated streambed (reference reach). Figure 5.1—Steps and considerations in site assessment. Chapter 5—Site Assessment After verifying that the site is suitable for a crossing and will probably be suitable for stream simulation, the next step is to conduct a thorough site assessment. In this phase, you will collect the topographic and other data necessary for designing both the stream-simulation channel and the crossing structure and road approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • River Terraces and Alluvial Fans: the Case for an Integrated Quaternary Fluvial Archive
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 01 University of Plymouth Research Outputs University of Plymouth Research Outputs 2016-10-21 River terraces and alluvial fans: The case for an integrated Quaternary fluvial archive Mather, A http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/6673 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.09.022 Quaternary Science Reviews All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in Quaternary Science Reviews available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.09.022 River terraces and alluvial fans: the case for an integrated Quaternary fluvial archive 1Mather, A.E., 1Stokes, M., 2Whitfield, E. 1School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK 2School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK Abstract The fluvial archive literature is dominated by research on river terraces with appropriate mention of adjacent environments such as lakes. Despite modern sedimentary basins comprising a significant (>88%) volume of distributive fluvial systems, of which alluvial fans (>1km, <30km in scale) are a significant part, interaction with these environments tends to be neglected and discussed in separate literature. This paper examines the dynamic role of alluvial fans within the fluvial landscape and their interaction with river systems, highlighting the potential value of alluvial fans to the wider fluvial archive community.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Terrace on the Huntington River – Deglacial and Post-Glacial History of Northern Vermont
    Geol 151 – Geomorphology Fall 2008 Your Name_________________________ Survey Partners_________________________ _________________________ _________________________ Fluvial Terrace on the Huntington River – Deglacial and Post-glacial History of Northern Vermont Fig 5.2 from Whalen, 1998. Schematic evolution of valley formation Introduction: We will return to the Huntington River Audubon Center this week to learn how to rapidly survey (using Pop-Levles) a flight of fluvial terraces formed during the deglacial and post-glacial history of the Huntington and Winooski River valleys, Vermont. In addition to these fast surveys, we will construct more detailed cross-sections of several fluvial features and terrace risers (scarps) cut into floodplains abandoned by the Huntington River during the Holocene using instruments called Auto-Levels. Finally, we will place the data we collect in the context of a pre-existing and comprehensive body of work assembled by Tim Whalen in 1998 in order to understand better how the landscape we tread upon today was created in the past through the actions of ice, falling levels of pro- glacial lakes, flowing water, changing climate, and the activities of humans over the past 200 years. What to hand in: This handout with all questions answered, your Pop Level and Auto Level field sketches drawn to scale, an excel plot of your auto-level cross-section (Completed by end of class on Friday), and your concept sketches of the Huntington River longitudinal profiles. 1 Geol 151 – Geomorphology Fall 2008 Gear we will need: • 5 GPS units • 5 of each the ortho and topo laminated maps. • 5 pop levels • 100 m, and several 30 m tapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Biking View Trip Dates North West Passage Book Now
    Mountain Biking View Trip Dates North West Passage Book Now Trip Grade: Blue 6 North West Passage All Inclusive We’ve created a wild mountain bike adventure that will take you through some of the wildest and most remote terrain in the UK. Falling between our Hebridean Trail and Coast to Coast trips in terms of its physical and technical challenge, the North West Passage will take you on an intricate route from the Atlantic Ocean to the North Sea and then back to the Atlantic. Starting out in Fort William on the West Coast we ease into our ride following the imposing geological fault line that is the Great Glen. From here the trail becomes more remote as we journey north to the stunning Glen Affric - widely considered as Scotland’s most beautiful glen. We spend a day exploring here before pushing further into the Northern Highlands. Big mountains, wild rivers and lonely glens dominate the landscapes, punctuated by trails which are perfect for mountain biking. Reaching the North Sea coast, our final day offers the unique opportunity to traverse an entire country in one day. Starting from the East Coast our route eventually leads us to the sheltered and dramatic Atlantic shores of Ullapool on Scotland’s mountainous West Coast. Highlights • Journey through some of the wildest and most remote terrain in the UK • Explore Glen Affric - widely considered as Scotland’s most beautiful glen • Traverse an entire country in one day, from the North Sea to the Atlantic Book with confidence • We guarantee this trip will run as soon as 2 people have booked • Maximum of 8 places available per departure PLEASE NOTE – The itinerary may be subject to change at the discretion of the Wilderness Scotland Guide with regard to weather conditions and other factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Mega Palace 5211 Route 38; Pennsauken, Nj 08109
    STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT MEGA PALACE 5211 ROUTE 38; PENNSAUKEN, NJ 08109 PREPARED FOR: MEGA PALACE INVESTMENT, LP 5201 ROUTE 38 PENNSAUKEN, NJ 08109 PREPARED BY: CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 370 EAST MAPLE AVE; SUITE 304 LANGHORNE, PA 19047 CEC PROJECT 194-266 FEBRUARY 2020 REVISED MAY 2020 MEGA PALACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................3 1.1 Site/Project Information .......................................................................................... 3 1.2 Owner of Record: Mega Palace Investment, LP ..................................................... 3 1.3 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Soil Information ...................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Geologic Conditions ............................................................................................... 4 1.6 Proposed Development ........................................................................................... 5 2.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT.................................................................................5 2.1 Existing Stormwater Drainage ................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Stonegate 1 ...................................................................................................5 2.1.2 Saigon Plaza .................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • A Geomorphic Classification System
    A Geomorphic Classification System U.S.D.A. Forest Service Geomorphology Working Group Haskins, Donald M.1, Correll, Cynthia S.2, Foster, Richard A.3, Chatoian, John M.4, Fincher, James M.5, Strenger, Steven 6, Keys, James E. Jr.7, Maxwell, James R.8 and King, Thomas 9 February 1998 Version 1.4 1 Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, Redding, CA; 2 Soil Scientist, Range Staff, Washington Office, Prineville, OR; 3 Area Soil Scientist, Chatham Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska Region, Sitka, AK; 4 Regional Geologist, Pacific Southwest Region, San Francisco, CA; 5 Integrated Resource Inventory Program Manager, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK; 6 Supervisory Soil Scientist, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM; 7 Interagency Liaison for Washington Office ECOMAP Group, Southern Region, Atlanta, GA; 8 Water Program Leader, Rocky Mountain Region, Golden, CO; and 9 Geology Program Manager, Washington Office, Washington, DC. A Geomorphic Classification System 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 History of Classification Efforts in the Forest Service ............................................................... 6 History of Development .............................................................................................................. 7 Goals
    [Show full text]
  • SFU Library Thesis Template
    Bedrock Structural Influences on River Morphology by Michael J. Curran BA, Colorado College, 2013 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Geography Faculty of Environment © Michael Curran 2020 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2020 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Michael Curran Degree: Master of Science Title: Bedrock Structural Influences on River Morphology Examining Committee: Chair: Rosemary Collard Assistant Professor Jeremy G. Venditti Senior Supervisor Professor John J. Clague Supervisor Professor Emeritus Doug Stead Supervisor Professor Allison Pfeiffer External Examiner Assistant Professor Department of Geology Western Washington University Date Defended/Approved: April 16, 2020 ii Abstract Bedrock rivers largely set the pace for landscape evolution in unglaciated terrain and yet little is known about what controls their morphologies. I examine the role that geologic structure plays in the alignment and morphology of bedrock canyons at different scales. At the watershed scale, I examine the striking alignment of the Fraser River with the Fraser River Fault zone and its largely unmapped secondary fault structures. I explore how large sediment inputs affect bedrock canyons alignment and their morphological characteristics. At the reach scale, I investigate how geological structure influences bedrock canyon width. I find that width constrictions coincide with dominant sub- horizontal joint sets whereas widenings coincide with dominant sub-vertical joint sets. I consider this in the context of sequential constrictions and widenings and propose a conceptual model where sub-vertical jointing makes canyon walls more susceptible to failure due to river undercutting than horizontal jointing.
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Dissertation Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Peter J. Wampler for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology presented on July 14, 2004. Title: Contrasting Geomorphic Responses to Climatic, Anthropogenic, and Fluvial Change Across Modern to Millennial Time Scales, Clackamas River, Oregon. Abstract approved: Gordon E. Grant Geomorphic change along the lower Clackamas River is occurring at a millennial scale due to climate change; a decadal scale as a result River Mill Dam operation; and at an annual scale since 1996 due to a meander cutoff. Channel response to these three mechanisms is incision. Holocene strath terraces, inset into Pleistocene terraces, are broadly synchronous with other terraces in the Pacific Northwest, suggesting a regional aggradational event at the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary. A maximum incision rate of 4.3 mm/year occurs where the river emerges from the Western Cascade Mountains and decreases to 1.4 mm/year near the river mouth. Tectonic uplift, bedrock erodibility, rapid base-level change downstream, or a systematic decrease in Holocene sediment flux may be contributing to the extremely rapid incision rates observed. The River Island mining site experienced a meander cutoff during flooding in 1996, resulting in channel length reduction of 1,100 meters as the river began flowing through a series of gravel pits. Within two days of the peak flow, 3.5 hectares of land and 105,500 m3 of gravel were eroded from the river bank just above the cutoff location. Reach slope increased from 0.0022 to approximately 0.0035 in the cutoff reach. The knick point from the meander cutoff migrated 2,290 meters upstream between 1996 and 2003, resulting in increased bed load transport, incision of 1 to 2 meters, and rapid water table lowering.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Eel River Valley Area, Humboldt
    TN 24 C3 :7u>.;fe4-. STATE OF CALIFOBina DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF EEL RIVER VALLEY AREA HUMBOLDT COUNTY. CALtFOBNIA BULLETIN 164 IS53 DIVISION OF MINES FEBHY BUILDING, SftN FRANCISCO THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS STATE OF CALIFORNIA EARL WARREN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WARREN T. HANNUM, Director DIVISION OF MINES FERRY BUILDING, SAN FRANCISCO 11 OLAF P. JENKINS. Chief SAN FRANCISCO BULLETIN 164 NOVEMBER 1953 GEOLOGY OF EEL RIVER VALLEY AREA HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By BURDETTE A. OGLE LIBRARY UNIVERSll Y OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To His Exccllencij The Honorable Earl Warren Governor of the State of California Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith Bulletin 164, Geology of Eel River Valley Area, Humholdt County, California, prepared under the direction of Olaf P. Jenkins, Chief of the Division of Mines, Depart- ment of Natural Resources. The report is accompanied by a detailed geologic map covering the Fernclale and Fortuna quadrangles and the northern part of the Scotia quadrangle, scale 1 : 62,500. The author, Bur- dette Ogle, mapped the geology of the area and prepared the report in fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate at the University of California. The area covers that part of the Eel River Basin in northwestern Cali- fornia where much interest is now being centered on the economic devel- opment of oil and gas resources. Other mineral materials of economic concern in the area are limestone, sand and gravel, crushed rock, volcanic ash, lignite, hematite, and water resources. This report represents the results of basic geologic studies which should be of value to all manner of interests in natural resources.
    [Show full text]