Recycling Agricultural, Forestry & Food Wastes and Residues for S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recycling Agricultural, Forestry & Food Wastes and Residues for S Technology options for feeding 10 billion people Recycling agricultural, forestry & food wastes and residues for sustainable bioenergy and biomaterials Study Science and Technology Options Assessment Technology options for feeding 10 billion people Recycling agricultural, forestry & food wastes and residues for sustainable bioenergy and biomaterials Study IP/A/STOA/FWC/2008-096/Lot3/C1/SC6 - SC8 September 2013 PE 513.513 STOA - Science and Technology Options Assessment The STOA project ‘Technology options for feeding 10 billion people - Recycling agricultural, forestry and food wastes and residues for sustainable bioenergy and biomaterials’ was carried out by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP). AUTHORS Bettina Kretschmer, Project Leader; Claire Smith, Emma Watkins, Ben Allen, Allan Buckwell, Jane Desbarats, Daniel Kieve. RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Lieve Van Woensel Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value Directorate General for Internal Policies, European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 - RMD 00J012 B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS: Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact STOA please write to [email protected] This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/ Manuscript completed in July 2013 Brussels, © European Union, 2013 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. CAT BA-03-13-490-EN-C DOI 10.2861/33176 ISBN 978-92-823-4734-8 Recycling agricultural, forestry & food wastes and residues for sustainable bioenergy and biomaterials Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine and review biorefinery technology options that exist to convert biomass in the form of agricultural crop and forestry residues and waste from the whole food chain into biomaterials and bioenergy. It assesses the technological options, including the sustainability of the processes involved. The study forms part of a bigger project commissioned by the European Parliament’s STOA (‘Science and Technology Options Assessment’) office under the heading of ‘Technology options for feeding 10 billion people’. Advanced biofuels and innovative bio-based pathways based on wastes and residues show considerable potential and should be further developed especially as Europe is already seen by some as having a lead in relevant technologies. However, there are also considerable uncertainties for investors and indeed all market participants and thus a major task is to ensure good transparency and better information concerning the availabilities of the waste and residue streams, the opportunities for processing, and the benefits to consumers. In addition, because, by definition, bio-based economic developments necessarily interact with ecosystems, there has to be visible assurance that the bio-products are indeed environmentally preferable with respect to GHG emissions, water, soil and biodiversity compared with their fossil-based counterparts. The conclusion is thus encouragement should be given to this sector, but with enhanced transparency of all aspects of its development, and with equally strong sustainability safeguards. STOA - Science and Technology Options Assessment The report should be cited as follows: Kretschmer, B, Smith, C, Watkins, E, Allen, B, Buckwell, A, Desbarats, J, Kieve, D (2013) Technology options for recycling agricultural, forestry and food wastes and residues for sustainable bioenergy and biomaterials. Report for the European Parliament, STOA, as part of the study ‘Technology Options for Feeding 10 Billion People’. IEEP: London. Corresponding author: Bettina Kretschmer ([email protected]) Acknowledgements: We are extremely grateful for additional research support by Floriana Pondichie; for support and guidance by David Baldock and Kaley Hart; and finally for the time offered by our interviewees (listed at the end of this report). This study is sponsored by the European Parliament’s STOA office under the specific service contract IP/A/STOA/FWC/2008-096/Lot3/C1 within the Framework Service Contract in 8 Lots for the provision of scientific consultancy for STOA, No. IP/A/STOA/FWC/2008-096. The Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) is an independent not-for-profit institute. IEEP undertakes work for external sponsors in a range of policy areas. We also have our own research programmes and produce the Manual of European Environmental Policy (http://www.europeanenvironmentalpolicy.eu). For further information about IEEP, see our website at http://www.ieep.eu or contact any staff member. London Office 15 Queen Anne's Gate London, SW1H 9BU Tel: +44 (0) 20 7799 2244 Brussels Office Quai au Foin, 55 Hooikaai 55 B- 1000 Brussels Tel: +32 (0) 2738 7482 Recycling agricultural, forestry & food wastes and residues for sustainable bioenergy and biomaterials TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 5 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 GENERAL STUDY CONTEXT................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 DEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE STUDY.................................................................................................... 12 2 MOBILISING WASTE AND RESIDUE STREAMS FROM THE AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FOOD SECTORS.................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 FOOD WASTE......................................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 AGRICULTURAL CROP RESIDUES........................................................................................................... 23 2.3 FORESTRY RESIDUES.............................................................................................................................. 31 2.4 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES OF POTENTIAL FROM THE FOOD, FORESTRY AND AGRICULTURAL SECTORS .. ............................................................................................................................................................... 39 3 TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS TO CONVERT BIOMASS INTO BIOMATERIALS AND BIOENERGY AND STATE OF THE BIOREFINERY INDUSTRY.................................................. 42 3.1 TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FOR CONVERTING BIOMASS TO BIOMATERIALS AND ENERGY....................... 43 3.2 THE BIOREFINERY INDUSTRY – CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK ......................................... 58 4 ASSESSING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF BIO-BASED PRODUCTS............................................ 82 4.1 RESOURCE EFFICIENT USE OF BIOMASS VIA CASCADING...................................................................... 85 4.2 REVIEW OF GREENHOUSE GAS LCAS ................................................................................................... 87 4.3 WIDER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS...................................................................................................... 99 4.4 SUMMARISING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CREDENTIALS OF BIO-BASED PRODUCTS............................... 109 5 THE FUTURE FOR A BIO-BASED INDUSTRY IN EUROPE PROCESSING WASTES AND RESIDUES ................................................................................................................................................ 111 5.1 SWOT ANALYSIS OF A EUROPEAN BIO-REFINERY INDUSTRY BASED ON WASTES AND RESIDUES..... 112 5.2 IN CONCLUSION AND THE WAY FORWARD ........................................................................................ 117 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 124 ANNEX 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES POTENTIALS .. 137 BEE PROJECT REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES...................................................................................... 137 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE POTENTIALS....................................................... 138 ANNEX 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON FORESTRY RESIDUES POTENTIALS .............. 141 BEE PROJECT REVIEW OF FORESTRY RESIDUES ............................................................................................... 141 SUMMARY OF EUWOOD RESULTS ON FOREST BIOMASS POTENTIALS ............................................................ 142 ANNEX 3 BIO-BASED PRODUCTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................. 145 ANNEX 4 WASTES AND RESIDUES: EXISTING USES, RISKS OF DIVERTING THOSE AND SAFEGUARDS REQUIRED...................................................................................................... 146 ANNEX 5 LIST OF INTERVIEWEES ......................................................................................................... 149 STOA - Science and Technology Options Assessment
Recommended publications
  • IB Process Plant Study Page 2 of 107
    Industrial Biotechnology Process Plant Study March 2015 A report for: The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Innovate UK and The Industrial Biotechnology Leadership Forum (IBLF). Authors: David Turley1, Adrian Higson1, Michael Goldsworthy1, Steve Martin2, David Hough2, Davide De Maio1 1 NNFCC 2 Inspire Biotech Approval for release: Adrian Higson Disclaimer While NNFCC and Inspire biotech considers that the information and opinions given in this work are sound, all parties must rely on their own skill and judgement when making use of it. NNFCC will not assume any liability to anyone for any loss or damage arising out of the provision of this report. NNFCC NNFCC is a leading international consultancy with expertise on the conversion of biomass to bioenergy, biofuels and bio-based products. NNFCC, Biocentre, Phone: +44 (0)1904 435182 York Science Park, Fax: +44 (0)1904 435345 Innovation Way, E: [email protected] Heslington, York, Web: www.nnfcc.co.uk YO10 5DG. IB Process Plant Study Page 2 of 107 Acknowledgement NNFCC wishes to acknowledge the input of the many stakeholders who provided information on the pilot scale equipment present in their respective facilities and more specifically the following stakeholders who gave of their time and experience, either in the workshop, or in one-to-one discussions with the project team. We would like to thank all for their valued input. Sohail Ali Plymouth Marine Laboratory Mike Allen Plymouth Marine Laboratory
    [Show full text]
  • Local Identities       
    Local Identities Editorial board: Prof. dr. E.M. Moormann Prof. dr.W.Roebroeks Prof. dr. N. Roymans Prof. dr. F.Theuws Other titles in the series: N. Roymans (ed.) From the Sword to the Plough Three Studies on the Earliest Romanisation of Northern Gaul ISBN 90 5356 237 0 T. Derks Gods,Temples and Ritual Practices The Transformation of Religious Ideas and Values in Roman Gaul ISBN 90 5356 254 0 A.Verhoeven Middeleeuws gebruiksaardewerk in Nederland (8e – 13e eeuw) ISBN 90 5356 267 2 N. Roymans / F.Theuws (eds) Land and Ancestors Cultural Dynamics in the Urnfield Period and the Middle Ages in the Southern Netherlands ISBN 90 5356 278 8 J. Bazelmans By Weapons made Worthy Lords, Retainers and Their Relationship in Beowulf ISBN 90 5356 325 3 R. Corbey / W.Roebroeks (eds) Studying Human Origins Disciplinary History and Epistemology ISBN 90 5356 464 0 M. Diepeveen-Jansen People, Ideas and Goods New Perspectives on ‘Celtic barbarians’ in Western and Central Europe (500-250 BC) ISBN 90 5356 481 0 G. J. van Wijngaarden Use and Appreciation of Mycenean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy (ca. 1600-1200 BC) The Significance of Context ISBN 90 5356 482 9 Local Identities - - This publication was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). This book meets the requirements of ISO 9706: 1994, Information and documentation – Paper for documents – Requirements for permanence. English corrected by Annette Visser,Wellington, New Zealand Cover illustration: Reconstructed Iron Age farmhouse, Prehistorisch
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeo-Ecological and Archaeological Analysis of Two Dutch Celtic Fields
    University of Groningen Palaeo-ecological and archaeological analysis of two Dutch Celtic fields (Zeijen-Noordse Veld and Wekerom-Lunteren): solving the puzzle of local Celtic field bank formation Arnoldussen, Stijn; Linden, Marjolein van der Published in: Vegetation History and Archaeobotany DOI: 10.1007/s00334-017-0625-z IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2017 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Arnoldussen, S., & Linden, M. V. D. (2017). Palaeo-ecological and archaeological analysis of two Dutch Celtic fields (Zeijen-Noordse Veld and Wekerom-Lunteren): solving the puzzle of local Celtic field bank formation. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 26(6), 551-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017- 0625-z Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report (PDF 2.1MB)
    Contents Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Requirement for SA and SEA 4 1.2 City Plan Part 2 6 1.3 Purpose of the SA Scoping Report 6 1.4 SEA Regulations Requirements 7 1.4 Layout of the Scoping Report 8 Section 2 Consultation 2.1 Introduction 10 2.2 Consultation Questions 10 2.3 How to Comment 11 Section 3 Topic Chapters 3.0 Introduction 12 3.1 Biodiversity & Geodiversity 13 3.2 Water Quality and Resources 25 3.3 Soil, Waste and Land Resources 33 3.4 Air Quality and Transportation 41 3.5 Climate Change and Flooding 59 3.6 Cultural Heritage, Landscape and Open Space 71 3.7 Population, Human Health & Inequalities 87 3.8 Housing & Community 106 3.9 Local Economy, Employment, Skills and Education 120 Section 4 SA Framework & Methodology 4.1 Introduction 140 4.2 SA Framework – Policies 140 4.3 Methodology 144 4.4 SA Framework - Sites 145 Section 5 Next Steps 5.1 Consultation period 153 Appendices A – Plans, Policies and Guidance 154 B – Baseline Information and Indicators 193 C – Copy of Consultation Response Form 204 D - Maps 208 2 List of Maps 1. Special Area of Conservation 2. Sites of Special Scientific Interest 3. Local Nature Reserves (declared) 4. Local Nature Reserves (proposed) 5. Sites of Nature Conservation Importance 6. Groundwater Source Protection Zones 7. Road Noise Mapping – daytime 8. Tidal flood risk 9. Surface Water Flood Risk 1 in 30 year event 10. Surface Water Food Risk 1 in 200 year event 11. Conservation Areas 12. South Downs National Park List of Figures 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for North Dorset District Council
    Public Document Pack CABINET Members of Cabinet are invited to attend this meeting at South Walks House, South Walks, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1EE to consider the items listed on the following page. Stuart Caundle Head of Paid Service Date: Monday, 4 February 2019 Time: 2.00 pm Venue: Committee Room A & B - South Walks House Members of Committee: G Carr-Jones (Chairman), D Walsh (Vice-Chairman), P Brown, S Jespersen, A Kerby and M Roake USEFUL INFORMATION For more information about this agenda please telephone Sandra Deary 01258 484370 email [email protected] This agenda and reports are also available on the Council’s website at www.dorsetforyou.com/committees/ North Dorset District Council. Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting with the exception of any items listed in the exempt part of this agenda. Disabled access is available for all of the council’s committee rooms. Hearing loop facilities are available. Please speak to a Democratic Services Officer for assistance in using this facility. Mod.gov public app now available – Download the free public app now for your iPad, Android and Windows 8.1/10 tablet from your app store. Search for Mod.gov to access agendas/ minutes and select Dorset Councils Partnership. Recording, photographing and using social media at meetings The council is committed to being open and transparent in the way it carries out its business whenever possible. Anyone can film, audio-record, take photographs, and use social media such as tweeting and blogging to report the meeting when it is open to the public, so long as they conform to the Council’s protocol, a copy of which can be obtained from the Democratic Services Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Age Scotland: Scarf Panel Report
    Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Images ©as noted in the text ScARF Summary Iron Age Panel Document September 2012 Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Summary Iron Age Panel Report Fraser Hunter & Martin Carruthers (editors) With panel member contributions from Derek Alexander, Dave Cowley, Julia Cussans, Mairi Davies, Andrew Dunwell, Martin Goldberg, Strat Halliday, and Tessa Poller For contributions, images, feedback, critical comment and participation at workshops: Ian Armit, Julie Bond, David Breeze, Lindsey Büster, Ewan Campbell, Graeme Cavers, Anne Clarke, David Clarke, Murray Cook, Gemma Cruickshanks, John Cruse, Steve Dockrill, Jane Downes, Noel Fojut, Simon Gilmour, Dawn Gooney, Mark Hall, Dennis Harding, John Lawson, Stephanie Leith, Euan MacKie, Rod McCullagh, Dawn McLaren, Ann MacSween, Roger Mercer, Paul Murtagh, Brendan O’Connor, Rachel Pope, Rachel Reader, Tanja Romankiewicz, Daniel Sahlen, Niall Sharples, Gary Stratton, Richard Tipping, and Val Turner ii Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Executive Summary Why research Iron Age Scotland? The Scottish Iron Age provides rich data of international quality to link into broader, European-wide research questions, such as that from wetlands and the well-preserved and deeply-stratified settlement sites of the Atlantic zone, from crannog sites and from burnt-down buildings. The nature of domestic architecture, the movement of people and resources, the spread of ideas and the impact of Rome are examples of topics that can be explored using Scottish evidence. The period is therefore important for understanding later prehistoric society, both in Scotland and across Europe. There is a long tradition of research on which to build, stretching back to antiquarian work, which represents a considerable archival resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Visioning Sydney from the Fringe: Productive Diversities for a 21St Century City
    Re-visioning Sydney from the Fringe: Productive Diversities for a 21st Century City Sarah James Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy University of Western Sydney 2009 Dedication To my grandparents, whose commitment to social and environmental justice has always inspired me. ii Acknowledgements There are so many people whose assistance and generosity with their time, knowledge and experience was critical to the realisation of this research project. I would like to gratefully acknowledge and thank: All those who participated in this research. In particular I would like to thank the farmers and Aboriginal groups who shared their experiences as well as their valuable time. I would also like to thank the various government representatives, at local and state level, and consultants who provided a broader perspective to my research. My primary supervisor Professor Kay Anderson, for her invaluable guidance, support and eternal patience in the crafting of this thesis. It has been a great privilege to learn from such a brilliant scholar and dedicated teacher. Thank you for believing in my ideas and for encouraging me to strive for ever-higher standards. Other supervisors Professor Ien Ang, whose encouragement and intellectual contributions were key to the development of this thesis. Dr Fiona Allon, for her contributions to the formation and refinement of this thesis. I would also like to express my thanks to: Associate Professor Frances Parker, who generously shared her experience and knowledge from years of work with Sydney’s culturally and linguistically diverse market gardeners. Her long-standing relationships with, and insight into, these groups made possible the principal empirical study on which this research is based The Centre for Cultural Research, which provided a creative and supportive environment for research.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLTEXT01.Pdf
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a chapter published in The agrarian history of sweden : from 4000 BC to AD 2000. Citation for the original published chapter: Widgren, M., Pedersen, E A. (2011) Agriculture in Sweden: 800 BC-AD 1000. In: Janken Myrdal & Mats Morell (ed.), The agrarian history of sweden : from 4000 BC to AD 2000 (pp. 46-71). Lund: Nordic academic press N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published chapter. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-57991 The Agrarian History of Sweden 4000 bc to ad 2000 Edited by Janken Myrdal & Mats Morell stiftelsen lagersberg nordic academic press The publication of this work has been realized with the generous support of Stiftelsen Lagersberg, Eskilstuna, Sweden. Nordic Academic Press P.O. Box 1206 SE-221 05 Lund www.nordicacademicpress.com © Nordic Academic Press and the Authors 2011 Translations: Charlotte Merton Typesetting: Stilbildarna i Mölle, Frederic Täckström, www.sbmolle.com Maps and figures: Stig Söderlind Cover: Anette Rasmusson Cover image: ‘The harvest’, a painted tapestry by Johannes Nilsson (1757–1827), from Breared in southern Sweden. Photo: Halland’s Regional Museum, Halmstad. Printed by ScandBook, Falun 2011 ISBN: 978-91-85509-56-0 Contents Introduction 7 Janken Myrdal & Mats Morell 1. Early farming households, 3900–800 bc 18 Stig Welinder 2. Agriculture in Sweden, 800 bc–ad 1000 46 Ellen Anne Pedersen & Mats Widgren 3. Farming and feudalism, 1000–1700 72 Janken Myrdal 4. The agricultural revolution in Sweden, 1700–1870 118 Carl-Johan Gadd 5.
    [Show full text]
  • European Spatial Planning and Landscape, No
    ID 8182 Aménagement du territoire n°89 Pant 5135 31/07/09 16:04 Page 1 Proceedings/Actes 89 o S e v e n ee t gg h aa ss m yy aa e e pp t uu i n dd g ee o nn f n n ee t h éé e pp oo W rr uu o ee r k nn s oo h ii tt o nn p ee s vv o nn f oo t CC h e aa ll C ee o dd u ee n Seventh meeting of the Workshops rr c vv i l uu o f of the Council of Europe for the implementation œœ E nn u ee r of the European Landscape Convention ee o ss ii p e mm f aa o ll r rr Septième réunion des Ateliers t uu h oo e pp i du Conseil de l’Europe pour la mise en œuvre m ee pp p oo l rr e de la Convention européenne du paysage uu m EE ’’ e ll n ee t a dd t ll ii i Le paysage dans les politiques de panification o ee n ss nn o et la gouvernance: vers un aménagement intégré du territoire oo f CC t h uu e dd Landscape in planning policies E ss rr u ee r ii and governance: towards integrated spatial management ll o ee p tt The Council of Europe has 47 member states, covering virtually the entire continent of e AA a n ss ee Europe. It seeks to develop common democratic and legal principles based on the L dd a a n nn European Convention on Human Rights and other reference texts on the protection d oo ii s nn c a of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Xi 1963 Part I
    VOLUME XI 1963 PART I PRINCIPAL CONTENTS The Pattern of Settlement in Roman Britain by S. APPLEBAUM * The Development of Mechanization in English Farming by W. HARWOOD LONG * I, ivestock Prices in Britain by EDITH H. WHETHAM II ,II 1 I { THE AGRICULTURAL HISTORY REVIEW VOLUME XI PART 1 • 1963 CONTENTS The Pattern of Settlement in Roman Britain S. Applebaum page 1 The Development of Mechanization in English Farming W. Harwood Long 15 Livestock Prices in Britain, 1851-93 Edith H. Whetham 27 List of Books and Articles on Agrarian History issued since September 1961 Joan Thirsk 36 Reviews: English Country Life, z78o-z83o , by E. W. Bovill E. L. Jones 47 Victoria County History of Oxfordshire, vii, ed. M. Lobel B. F. Harvey 47 Victoria County History of Middlesex, III, ed. Susan Reynolds Michael Robbbzs 49 The Agricultural History of Cheshire, z75o-z85o , by C. Stella Davies Joan Thirsh 50 A Survey of the Agriculture of Northnmberland, by H. C. Pawson W. Harwood Long 51 Lord and Peasant bz Russia from the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century, by Jerome Blum R. E. F. Smith 52 History of Seed Crushing bz Great Britain, by H. W. Brace Joan Thirsk 53 Rural Settlement and Land Use, by Michael Chisholm G. H. Peters 54 Agricultural Sir John, The Life of Sir John Sinclair of Ulbster, z754-z835 , by Rosalind Mitchison Alexander Fenton 55 The Lor~hip of Strattzavon: Tomintoul under the Gordons, by V. Gaffney George Houston 56 Men of Yesterday, by Margaret Kiddle L. McGregor 57 Principles and Methods of Anbnal Breeding, by R.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Roman Britain
    Agriculture in Roman Britain By SHIMON APPLEBAUM I I F we consider that agriculture employed a majority of the population in non-industrial societies and is still man's staple occupation, we must ad- -mit that the agriculture of Roman Britain has concerned archaeologists and historians much less than it should, for on its vicissitudes depended to no small degree the well-being and decline of the province. The existence of Roman 'villas' was first recognized in this country in the age of Elizabeth, and they began to be excavated in the eighteenth century. The mosaics of the Stonesfield house, Oxfor.dshire, were found in 171i; Lysons published his handsome account of the Woodchester villa, Gloucestershire, in 1797. But it took a long time before antiquaries understood these remains to be those of farms. The gentlemanly outlook of the Victorian antiquaries, pro- jected upon these relics, saw them as the country residences of Roman officers and gentry; gay mosaics and Horatian banquets were more attractive than cow-houses. In a new epoch (19oo) Professor Haverfield, writing his introduction to the Romano-British section of the Victoria County Histories; revealed a clear theoretical realization that the normal 'villa' "was the pro- perty of a great landowner who.., cultivated the ground close to it..."; "... the blocks (sc. of the villa's buildings) may consist of corridor house, barns, outhouses, and farm-buildings." But Haverfield never reached the point of attempting to identify such buildings in the villa-plans he knew. John Ward, to whom Romano-British archaeology owes so much on the practical side, also grasped the villas' agricultural r61e, particularly where the 'basilical' house was concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Director's Message | Highlights | Education and Outreach | ASR 2003 Home
    NCAR 2003 Annual Scientific Report Director's Message | Highlights | Education and Outreach | ASR 2003 Home Director's Message Dear Colleagues: I am very pleased to present to you this Web-based 2003 Annual Scientific Report for the National Center for Atmospheric Research. We continue to make great strides in the implementation of our strategic plan (http://www.ncar.ucar.edu/stratplan/plan.pdf), with progress on basic research in the atmospheric and related sciences, supercomputing and cyberinfrastructure, HIAPER and other observing facilities, field campaigns and workshops, and large- scope community models. This past year, our startup programs in Biogeosciences, Water Cycle, Wildland Fire, Geographic Information Systems, Data Assimilation, and other strategic initiatives, have made significant progress, fostering new collaborations with our university colleagues. Our education and outreach programs are quickly expanding, with exciting programs for educators, students, and the public. All of our work is designed to link with and extend the capabilities of the university research community. This report provides detailed summaries of these and many more of our activities. A new feature of this year's report is an Executive Summary from each division. Reading these will provide you with an overview of divisional work which can be expanded with just a click of the mouse, taking you the body of the report where you will find the details of the work. Facilities and Community Support Supercomputing The Scientific Computing Division's Advanced Computing Research System (ARCS) saw major advances this year, with the addition of a completely new supercomputer, "bluesky". On its arrival, bluesky was ranked in the top ten of supercomputers worldwide and immediately doubled the Community and Climate Simulation Laboratory computing resources.
    [Show full text]