The Government and Taxes We Want The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FY-2018 Executive Budget
FY-2018 Executive Budget Governor Mary Fallin February 6, 2017 This publication is issued by the Office of Management and Enterprise Services as authorized by Title 62, Section 34. Copies have not been printed but are available through the agency website. This work is licensed under a Creative Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Mary Fallin Office of the Governor State of Oklahoma To the Citizens of the Great State of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Legislature: It is my pleasure to submit for your consideration the FY-2018 executive budget. The plan I have put forward is part of a long-term blueprint for more reliable revenue estimating and greater legislative control over limited government resources to better govern for the needs of the day. The success of this fiscal blueprint relies on our ability to address structural deficiencies within the budget-making process. As outlined in the executive summary of this budget book, the state of Oklahoma currently faces substantial budget challenges. The budget I propose charts a realistic, responsible way forward for the state of Oklahoma. It asks our lawmakers to take on the serious challenges inherent in fixing a budget process in need of an overhaul. Finally, it makes strategic cuts to some areas of government while boosting resources necessary to pursuing critical improvements. I humbly ask your support for these priorities as we move into the 2017 legislative session. Sincerely, Mary Fallin Governor STATE CAPITOL BUILDING 2300 N. LINCOLN BLVD., SUITE 212 OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73105-4801 (405) 521-2342 FAX (405) 521-3353 Preston L. -
October 2006
October 2006 CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to educating the American public about waste, mismanagement, and inefficiency in the federal government. CAGW was founded in 1984 by J. Peter Grace and nationally syndicated columnist Jack Anderson to build support for implementation of the Grace Commission recommendations and other waste-cutting proposals. Since its inception, CAGW has been at the forefront of the fight for efficiency, economy, and accountability in government. CAGW has one million members and supporters nationwide. Since 1984, CAGW and its members have helped save taxpayers more than $825 billion. CAGW publishes a quarterly newsletter, Government Waste Watch, and produces special reports, monographs, and television documentaries examining government waste and what citizens can do to stop it. CAGW is classified as a Section 501(c)(3) organization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and is recognized as a publicly supported organization described in Section 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(A)(vi) of the code. Individuals, corporations, companies, associations, and foundations are eligible to support the work of CAGW through tax-deductible gifts. 1301 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 467-5300 Internet Address: www.cagw.org OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS The Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs (OCPA) is a public policy research organization whose mission is to formulate and promote public policies consistent with the principles of free enterprise and limited government. OCPA was founded in 1993 by board chairman Dr. David R. Brown, a retired orthopedic surgeon who also serves as chairman of The Heritage Foundation, the nation’s leading conservative think tank. -
Coronavirus Relief Funds
Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency Rapid Response Evaluation: Coronavirus Relief Funds February 2021 Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency State Capitol Building, Room 107 2300 North Lincoln Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73105 okloft.gov LOFT: Coronavirus Relief Funds Rapid Response Evaluation 2 Table of Contents LOFT Oversight Committee .............................................................................. 3 Executive Summary .......................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................... 11 Finding 1: Process for spending Coronavirus relief funds lacked structure and clarity. ............................................................................................................ 14 Finding 2: A significant component of relief funds was used for economic support and government modernization. ..................................................... 24 Finding 3: Ongoing State needs would be underfunded if not for additional aid. .................................................................................................................. 28 Summary of Recommendations ..................................................................... 33 About the Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency ...................................... 34 Appendices ..................................................................................................... 35 Appendix A. Methodology .................................................................... -
Agencies, Boards, & Commissions
Agencies, Boards, & Commissions 228 229 Profiles of Agencies, Boards, and Commissions For information about boards or board members, contact the administrator. In the case of subordinate entities, unless a separate address and phone number are given, contact the main agency for information. For governor’s task forces, for example, contact the governor’s office; for legislative committees, contact the Legislative Service Bureau (405/521–4144). If the entity is not listed, consult the index, as it may be listed alphabetically beneath a par- ent entity. Personnel figures are provided by the agency. Interagency Mail availability is indicated by (IA). 2–1–1 Oklahoma Coordinating Council (56 O.S. § 3021) Formerly named the 2–1–1 Advisory Collaborative, Oklahoma www.211oklahoma.org Abstractors Board, Oklahoma (1 O.S. § 22) Re-created until July 1, 2019 Agency Code 022 (IA) www.abstract.ok.gov 2401 NW 23 Street, Suite 60B, Oklahoma City 73107 405/522–5019, fax 405/522–5503 Mission Statement The Oklahoma Abstractors Board regulates the abstracting industry and issues abstractor licenses, certificates of authority, and permits to construct abstract plants. Administration Glynda Reppond, Executive Director Personnel 2 unclassified History and Function The board consists of nine members, six of whom are in the abstracting industry, one real estate representative, one banking representative, and one attorney. All members are appointed by the governor and serve staggered four year terms. The board is responsible for promulgating rules, setting forth guidelines for agency operations, and governing the professional practices of the licensees. The entity is self-supporting through fees. Accountancy Board, Oklahoma (59 O.S. -
Oklahoma Tax Commission
• lurY x- Fourth Biennial Report of the OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION July 1, 1938, to June 30, 1940 J. D. CARMICHAEL Chairman JOE D. DUNN HUBERT L. BOLEN Vice Chairman Member OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA Fourth Biennial Report of the OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION to the GOVERNOR of the STATE OF OKLAHOMA Period, July 1, 1938, to June 30, 1940 COMMISSION J. D. CARMICHAEL, Chairman JOE D. DUNN, Vice Chairman HUBERT L. BOLEN, Member F. M. DUDLEY, Attorney L. E. RUBLE, Seer etary T Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1940 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL V TO THE HONORABLE LEON C. PHILLIPS, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: THE OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION HEREWITH SUB MITS ITS FOURTH BIENNIAL REPORT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 12302, CHAPTER 66, ARTICLE 1, OKLAHOMA STATUTES, 1931. J. D. CARMICHAEL, Chairman JOE. D. DUNN, Vice Chairman HUBERT L. BOLEN, Member OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA DECEMBER 1, 1940 REPORT OF OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION CONTENTS Page LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL iii CHAPTER I—ORGANIZATION AND POLICIES 1 Organization of the Commission 1 Policies 9 Economy in Tax Administration 9 Is Oklahoma's Tax System Unfair to Industry? 11 Indebtedness of State and Local Governments 14 Reciprocity Agreements 15 CHAPTER II—COLLECTIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS 19 Summary of Tax Collections 20 Disposition of Revenues __--__--__ 25 Moneys Apportioned to Counties 28 Moneys Apportioned to Counties for Schools 29 Moneys Apportioned to Counties for Roads 30 CHAPTER III—COSTS OF ADMINISTRATION 81 History 81 Opinion of Tax Administrators on the Financing of Tax Administration 82 General Discussion -
FY 2005 Executive Budget (PDF)
FY-2005 Executive Budget Governor Brad Henry February 2, 2004 This publication, printed by Central Printing, is issued by the Office of State Finance as authorized by Sections 41.33 and 41.34 of Title 62 of the Oklahoma Statutes. Four Hundred Fifty (450) copies have been prepared and distributed at a cost of $ . Copies have been deposited with the Publications Clearinghouse of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries. February 2, 2004 To the citizens of the Great State of Oklahoma and to the Oklahoma State Legislature: I am pleased to submit for your consideration my second executive budget. As required by state law, I have presented a balanced budget. I have spoken often of the challenges we face and the opportunities that lie ahead. We successfully met many challenges, yet much remains to be done. As a result of such tests, we have emerged a stronger state. We Oklahomans are a great people. Our spirit, hard work and determination have prevailed in the past and will again. It is my belief that the changes proposed in this budget and the agenda I have set will help us secure a future of opportunity, strength and prosperity. I ask the Legislature and the citizens of Oklahoma to give serious consideration to these recommendations. We can accomplish tremendous things working together toward the same goal. After all, we want the same thing: A better Oklahoma. Sincerely, Brad Henry Governor February 2, 2004 Governor Henry: Please accept this as your FY-05 Executive Budget. The budget is balanced as required by law. The budgets of all state agencies, boards and commissions were reviewed extensively in the preparation of this budget. -
Oklahoma House of Representatives
Oklahoma FY-05 Legislative Appropriations House of Representatives Legislative Appropriations Oklahoma House of Representatives Speaker Larry Adair Appropriations and Budget Committee Representative Bill Mitchell, Chairman Representative Jack Bonny, Vice Chairman August, 2004 Research, Legal and Fiscal Divisions George V. Moser, Executive Director Debbie Terlip Scott C. Emerson Gregory Sawyer Acting Research Director Chief Counsel Fiscal Director APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET COMMITTEE Bill Mitchell, Chairman Jack Bonny, Vice-Chairman Dennis Adkins Joan Greenwood Richard Phillips Jari Askins* Terry Harrison Greg Piatt Chris Benge Jerry Hefner* Bob Plunk Debbie Blackburn* Joe Hutchison** Clay Pope Dan Boren** Terry Ingmire Larry Rice David Braddock* Tad Jones Paul Roan Kevin Calvey Ron Langmacher Curt Roggow John Carey M.C. Leist* John Smaligo Lance Cargill Al Lindley Glen Bud Smithson Bill Case Elmer Maddux Barbara Staggs Forrest Claunch Ray McCarter** Fred Stanley Carolyn Coleman Roy McClain Joe Sweeden James Covey Doug Miller Sue Tibbs Odilia Dank Ray Miller Opio Toure** Frank Davis Fred Morgan Dale Turner** Abe Deutschendorf Bill Nations** Purcy Walker** Joe Eddins* Jim Newport Dale Wells Stuart Ericson Mike O’Neal Jim Wilson Randall Erwin* Bill Paulk Mike Wilt Larry Ferguson Fred Perry Susan Winchester Darrell Gilbert** Ron Peterson Robert Worthen Bill Graves Wayne Pettigrew Ray Young * Denotes a Subcommittee Chairman ** Denotes a Subcommittee Vice-Chairman GENERAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE APPOINTEES Bill Mitchell, -
Issue Briefs Findings & Recommendations
ISSUE BRIEFS FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS THE 2011 TOWN HALL DEVELOPING THE OKLAHOMA ECONOMY FOREWORD 2011 Oklahoma Academy Town Hall DEVELOPING THE OKLAHOMA ECONOMY The Oklahoma Academy Board of Directors selected this topic in June 2010. It was considered from a list of important issues provided from a survey of Academy members and nonmembers, business and community leaders, educators, chamber executives and members, leadership groups, legislators, agency leaders and more. We believe the 2011 Town Hall has explored the right issue at the right time, with the right group of participants representing Oklahoma’s diverse population. The Town Hall addressed economic development, not as it has always been approached, but as it must be considered to effectively move Oklahoma into a place of national and global marketplace importance. The Town Hall produced eight significant findings and recommendations. They are included here, and are being presented to all involved Oklahoma policymakers and interested citizens and organizations. Tom McKeon, 2011 Oklahoma Academy Chairman and Susan Winchester, 2011 Town Hall Chair A HEARTY THANK YOU TO OUR TOWN HALL SPONSORS GOLD Oklahoma Gas and Electric, Oklahoma City BancFirst, Oklahoma City Chickasaw Nation, Ada SILVER Devon Energy, Oklahoma City i2E, Oklahoma City and Tulsa Public Service Company of Oklahoma OCAST, Oklahoma City BRONZE Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce Tulsa Metro Chamber of Commerce University of Science & Arts of Oklahoma STUDENTS University of Central Oklahoma Oklahoma City University © 2011 The Oklahoma Academy for State Goals Recommendation 1 OUR WORKFORCE The 2011 Oklahoma Academy Town Hall CREATE AND DEPLOY A WORKFORCE MASTER PLAN The Town Hall considered all recommendations of the Governor’s Task Force on Economic Development. -
Black Legal History in Oklahoma
ALSO INSIDE: OBA & Diversity Awards • New Members Admitted • JNC Elections Legislative Update • New Member Benefit • Solo & Small Firm Conference Volume 92 — No. 5 — May 2021 Black Legal History in Oklahoma contents May 2021 • Vol. 92 • No. 5 THEME: BLACK LEGAL HISTORY IN OKLAHOMA Editor: Melissa DeLacerda Cover Art: Ada Lois Sipuel Fisher by Mitsuno Reedy from the Oklahoma State Capitol Art Collection, used with permission, courtesy of the Oklahoma Arts Council FEATURES PLUS 6 Blazing the Trail: Oklahoma Pioneer African 36 OBA Awards: Leading is a Choice, American Attorneys Let Us Honor It BY JOHN G. BROWNING BY KARA I. SMITH 12 ‘As Soon As’ Three Simple Words That Crumbled 39 New Member Benefit: OBA Newsstand Graduate School Segregation: ADA LOis SipUEL V. 40 Celebrate Diversity With an Award BOARD OF REGENTS Nomination BY CHERYL BROWN WATTLEY 42 New Lawyers Take Oath in Admissions 18 GUINN V. U.S.: States’ Rights and the 15th Amendment Ceremony BY ANTHONY HENDRicks 44 Legislative Monitoring Committee Report: 24 The Tulsa Race Massacre: Echoes of 1921 Felt a Session Winding Down Century Later BY MILES PRINGLE BY JOHN G. BROWNING 45 Solo & Small Firm Conference 30 Oklahoma’s Embrace of the White Racial Identity BY DANNE L. JOHNSON AND PAMELA JUAREZ 46 Judicial Nominating Commission Elections DEPARTMENTS 4 From the President 50 From the Executive Director 52 Law Practice Tips 58 Ethics & Professional Responsibility 60 Board of Governors Actions 64 Oklahoma Bar Foundation News 68 Young Lawyers Division 73 For Your Information 74 Bench and Bar Briefs 80 In Memoriam 82 Editorial Calendar 88 The Back Page PAGES 36 and 40 – PAGE 42 – OBA & Diversity Awards New Lawyers Take Oath FROM THE PRESIDENT Words, Life of Frederick Douglass Are Inspiring By Mike Mordy HE THEME OF THIS BAR JOURNAL, “BLACK who was known as a “slave breaker,” and I TLegal History,” reminded me of Frederick Douglass, have read he beat Douglass so regularly that who was not an attorney but had all the attributes his wounds did not heal between beatings. -
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 49Th Oklahoma Legislature Second Session – 2004
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 49th Oklahoma Legislature Second Session – 2004 OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION From: Carolyn McCoy & Lesa Jolly-Borin Friday, February 27, 2004 Welcome to the OSRHE Legislative Update Highlights this Week: Gaming bill passes through House floor By Amber Esada - Staff Writer (LIN) A bill that would allow electronic gaming at three horse racing tracks passed Thursday in the state House of Representatives. SB 553, by Sen. Cal Hobson, D-Lexington, and Rep. Larry E. Adair, D-Stilwell, creates the State- Tribal Gaming Act. Rep. Kris Steele, R-Shawnee, asked if a tribe must enter the tobacco compact to have a gaming compact. Pope said the state would have to wait and let the U.S. Department of the Interior decide if the state can make such requirements. Steele asked if Class III games would be allowed with the new measure. Pope said the bill was an attempt to address the expansion of gaming. Pope said many different types of games are being played in the state and this bill would answer the questions related to which games are legal or illegal. Steele asked if the bill would expand gaming through Oklahoma. Pope said gambling would only be expanded to horse racing tracks, where pari-mutuel gambling is already allowed. Rep. John A. Wright, R-Broken Arrow, asked if the adjusted gross revenue was the amount left after the casinos paid out to players. Pope said that was correct. Wright asked if 90 percent of the monies spent was returned to players. Pope said it depended on the odds, but for the most part, yes. -
Final Report of the Task Force on Comprehensive Tax Reform
December 30, 2011 Governor Mary Fallin 212 State Capitol Oklahoma City, OK 73105 President Pro Tempore Brian Bingman 422 State Capitol Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Speaker Kris Steele 401 State Capitol Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Dear Governor Fallin, President Pro Tempore Bingman and Speaker Steele: As Co-chair of the Task Force on Comprehensive Tax Reform, I am pleased to provide to you with the report required pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 61 (2010 Legislative Session) to study comprehensive reform for Oklahoma’s tax system. The Task Force focused on three primary goals: 1. Resolution of the issues surrounding taxation of intangible properties; 2. Changes to our tax code which would lower income tax rates and broaden the base of taxpayers to stimulate our economy and grow our tax revenue base for government priorities; and 3. Development of a framework for Oklahoma to become a “no-income tax” state. Thanks to the hard work, dedication and intensive collaboration of the members of the Task Force, the following report provides recommendations to address each of the goals listed above. In addition to four public hearings, a large number of Task Force members put in numerous hours of thought and effort during several work sessions to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the ideas and concepts that were presented to us by guest experts at our hearings. Our work proceeded in a very inclusive manner to make sure that adequate consideration was given to all participants in this process. As you and members of the Legislature consider these proposals, we hope that the taxpayers of Oklahoma will be your main priority. -
Excise Tax Differences at Oklahoma Smoke Shops an Opportunity for Inter-Tribal Coordination Fritz L
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Excise Tax Differences at Oklahoma Smoke Shops An Opportunity for Inter-Tribal Coordination Fritz L. Laux, PhD, Frank J. Chaloupka, PhD, Laura A. Beebe, PhD Background: Oklahoma’s tribal tobacco shops are distributed throughout the state, including in urban areas. During the time frame of this study, state excise tax rates for cigarettes varied by tribe and region, and took five distinct levels, ranging from 5.75 cents to $1.03 per pack. Purpose: To describe the pricing behavior of these smoke shops in a way that could support potential increases in the tribal taxation of cigarettes within the state. Methods: Two waves (2010 and 2011) of site visits were conducted, covering nearly all tribal smoke shops in the northeastern quarter of the state, an area containing the city of Tulsa and 60% of all tribal outlets. Researchers recorded representative prices and verified the tax rate paid (via tax stamp) for each shop. Data were analyzed in 2013. Results: Lower-taxed tribal cigarettes tended to be priced at discounts that were even greater than the differential in tax rates. For example, across waves, the average pack of Marlboros from a shop with a 5.75-cent tax stamp sold for 52 cents less than the same pack from a 25.75-cent shop and 60 cents less than from a 51.5-cent shop. The minimal inter-tribal price response to the discontinuation of large quantities of contraband cigarette sales suggests that inter-tribal price competition in the Tulsa area is not as intense as expected.