DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chechen Crisis and Its Implications for Russian Democracy Hearing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Chechen Crisis and Its Implications for Russian Democracy Hearing THE CHECHEN CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR RUSSIAN DEMOCRACY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 3, 1999 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 106-1-12] Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/csce 61-761CC U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2000 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado Chairman Co-Chairman FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas MATT SALMON, Arizona SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania TIM HUTCHINSON, Arkansas STENY H. HOYER, Maryland FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland BOB GRAHAM, Florida LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER, New York RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin MICHAEL P. FORBES, New York CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HAROLD HONGJU KOH, Department of State EDWARD L. WARNER III, Department of Defense PATRICK A. MULLOY, Department of Commerce COMMISSION S TAFF DOROTHY DOUGLAS TAFT, Chief of Staff RONALD J. MCNAMARA, DeputyChief of Staff AMBASSADOR WILLIAM H. COURTNEY, Senior Advisor ELIZABETH M. CAMPBELL, Staff Assistant/Systems Administrator MARIA V. COLL, Office Administrator OREST DEYCHAKIWSKY, Staff Advisor JOHN F. FINERTY, Staff Advisor CHADWICK R. GORE, Communications Director, Digest Editor ROBERT HAND, Staff Advisor JANICE HELWIG, Staff Advisor MARLENE KAUFMANN, Counsel KAREN S. LORD, Counsel for Freedom of Religion MICHAEL J. OCHS, Staff Advisor ERIKA B. SCHLAGER, Counsel for International Law MAUREEN T. WALSH, General Counsel (ii) THE CHECHEN CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR RUSSIAN DEMOCRACY NOVEMBER 3, 1999 OPENING STATEMENTS PAGE Rep. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman .......................................................... 1 Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell, Co-Chairman .............................................. 3 Rep. Steny H. Hoyer, Ranking Member ......................................................... 4 WITNESSES PAGE John B. Dunlop, Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution ............................... 6 Fiona Hill, Director of Strategic Planning, Eurasia Foundation ................. 9 Lyoma Usmanov, Representative of Chechen Republic to the United States ............................................................................................ 13 Yoav Karny, Journalist ................................................................................ 15 APPENDICES PAGE Prepared Statement of Rep. Steny H, Hoyer ............................................... 30 Prepared Statement of John B. Dunlop, The Hoover Institution ............... 32 Prepared Statement of Fiona Hill ............................................................... 35 Prepared Submission of Lyoma Usmanov ................................................... 42 Victors and Vanquished in Chechnya by Robert Bruce Ware, reprinted from the Los Angeles Times, Nov. 8, 1999 .............................. 53 Letter to Pres. William J. Clinton, submitted by the Institute for Democracy in Eastern Europe ............................................ 55 President of Ingushetia Pleads for Humanitarian Corridor, submitted by Cathy Fitzpatrick, International League for Human Rights ................. 57 Articles submitted by Human Rights WatchMoscow .............................. 60 The Current Crisis in Chechnya, Prepared Submission of Islamic Su- preme Council of America ........................................................................ 65 (iii) THE CHECHEN CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR RUSSIAN DEMOCRACY NOVEMBER 3, 1999 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND C OOPERATION IN EUROPE, WASHINGTON, DC The hearing was held at 10:00 a.m., in room 2226, Rayburn House Office Building, the Honorable Christopher H. Smith, Chairman, pre- siding. Commission Members present: Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chair- man; Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell, Co-Chairman; Hon. Steny H. Hoyer, Ranking Member; Hon. Frank R. Wolf; Hon. Joseph R. Pitts; and Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin. Witnesses present: Dr. John Dunlop, Senior Fellow, the Hoover Insti- tution; Dr. Fiona Hill, Director of Strategic Planning, Eurasia Founda- tion; Lyoma Usmanov, Representative of Chechen Republic to the United States; and Yoav Karny, journalist. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, CHAIRMAN Mr. SMITH. The Commission will come to order. Good morning. I am pleased to welcome you to this hearing of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Helsinki Commission. Today the Com- mission will examine the Chechen crisis and its implications for Rus- sian democracy. In response to armed incursions into Dagestan by Islamic extrem- ists in August and September of this year, and in the wake of un- solved terrorist bombings in Russia that killed almost 300 persons, Russia has renewed its war against Chechnya as the alleged culprit behind Russias problems with terrorism. Unfortunately, in using the excuse of seeking to punish a handful of guilty or alleged guilty per- sons, the Russian Government is applying indiscriminate force far out of proportion to its stated objectives. As was the case four years ago, thousands of innocent persons are being killed or displaced by the Russian offensive. As winter ap- proaches in the North Caucasus, a humanitarian catastrophe threat- ens in the neighboring region of Ingushetia, where the majority of refu- gees have fled to makeshift camps. At last report, up to 190,000 persons from Northern Chechnya had been internally displaced. (1) 2 The capital city, Grozny, is under siege by the Russian army, and a Russian rocket attack on the market in the center of town left a re- ported 143 dead. It would appear that Moscow, supported at the present by Russian public opinion, is going full blast to revenge its humiliating loss of Chechnya in the 1994 to 1996 war. Honesty compels us to make the assessment that in the three years of de facto independence, the Chechen Government has been unable to create a viable basis for the rule of law or a growing stable economy. To a considerable degree, this is a result of the devastation of the war, the absence of economic reform, and the relative isolation of Chechnya geo- graphically. But Chechnya would have enjoyed a great deal more international support over the past three years if foreigners had not been afraid to go there lest they be kidnapped and potentially killed, as was the case with the American citizen and humanitarian worker, Fred Cuny, who went to Chechnya on a humanitarian mission. To this day, his exact fate is not known. Of course, many residents in Chechnya were also the vic- tims of kidnapping and murder, including several clergy and members of Christian churches. There is agreement, I am sure, among my colleagues in the Con- gress as well as in the Executive Branch, that any country, including the Russian Federation, is justified in using appropriate methods to combat terrorism. However, launching a war against innocent civil- ians is another matter. Russia is a participating State of the OSCE and has agreed to cer- tain standards regarding the protection of citizens when addressing internal security matters. Chechnya is currently recognized by the international community as part of the Russian Federation; but this cannot be regarded as merely an internal affair, despite what Rus- sian military and political officials say. The 1991 Moscow Document of the OSCE clearly states that com- mitments undertaken in the field of the human dimensionand we are certainly speaking of the human dimension here are matters of direct and legitimate concern of all participating States. In this connection, I note that the Russian Foreign Minister Ivanov has announced that Russia has agreed to allow a delegation from the OSCE to visit Ingushetia, Dagestan, and the parts of Chechnya un- der federal control. While this recognition of OSCEs role is welcome, the Russian Government has also declared that it no longer recognizes President Maskhadov as the legitimate head of the Chechen Republic. The president was elected, as we know, in February of 1997 in a multi- party election observed by international observers, including the OSCE, with the approval of the Russian Government. We expect the Russian Government to recognize the legitimate representatives of the people of Chechnya. We are also concerned that heavy-handed military solutions and Russias attempts to combat terrorism with a campaign of harass- ment against Caucasian minorities in Russian cities like Moscow may presage a move away from the rule of law, civil liberties, and demo- cratic development. There is speculation that the Yeltsin administra- tion may use the conflict in Chechnya as an excuse to cancel or post- pone parliamentary elections scheduled for December. 3 Moreover, the Chechen war may also have a serious and negative impact on the security situation in the entire Caucasus region. The region has already seen much armed conflict, violence, and human suffering, most recently the brutal assassination of a number of gov- ernment leaders in Armenia. I have, on several occasions in the past, criticized what I believe was an anemic response by our own Administration towards Russias treat- ment of the civilian population of the Chechen war during 1994 and 1996. I believe that the Administration appeared to give the green light to Moscow as early
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tourism Potential of the North Caucasus: the Formation, Characteristics and Development Prospects
    GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year XI, vol. 22, no. 2, 2018, p.347-358 ISSN 2065-0817, E-ISSN 2065-1198 DOI 10.30892/gtg.22206-293 THE TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE NORTH CAUCASUS: THE FORMATION, CHARACTERISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS Svetlana ANDREYANOVA* Stavropol State Agrarian University, Department of Tourism and Service, 355017, 12, Russia, Stavropol, Zootekhnichesky Ave, e-mail: [email protected] Anna IVOLGA Stavropol State Agrarian University, Department of Tourism and Service, 355017, 12, Russia, Stavropol, Zootekhnichesky Ave, e-mail: [email protected] Citation: ANDREYANOVA, S., & IVOLGA A. (2018). THE TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE NORTH CAUCASUS: THE FORMATION, CHARACTERISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites. 22(2), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.22206-293 Abstract: This research looks at the North Caucasus region at the south of Russia, a bridge between the Black and the Caspian Seas, its unique geographical location that determined the diversity of natural, climate and ethnographic resources. The goal is to show the modern complications concerning of the North Caucasus Region unique offer on the world tourist market. This has been done by examining different zones of nature management with their features in region. For this research we used coefficients relate with the social and economic development, and tourism attractiveness. As a result, we found the existing problems which lead to low internal demand and adverse demand on the international tourist market. Through showing that the Solving these urgent problems together with implementation of the Development Strategies will make the North Caucasus an attractive resort for different kind of tourists.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2010 English/French/Spanish only Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak Addendum Summary of information, including individual cases, transmitted to Governments and replies received* * The present document is being circulated in the languages of submission only as it greatly exceeds the page limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions. GE.10-11514 A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 Contents Paragraphs Page List of abbreviations......................................................................................................................... 5 I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–5 6 II. Summary of allegations transmitted and replies received....................................... 1–305 7 Algeria ............................................................................................................ 1 7 Angola ............................................................................................................ 2 7 Argentina ........................................................................................................ 3 8 Australia.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • After Stalin: the Decline and Fall of the Soviet Union (Weeks 1-12) | University of Kent
    10/01/21 After Stalin: The Decline and Fall of the Soviet Union (Weeks 1-12) | University of Kent After Stalin: The Decline and Fall of the View Online Soviet Union (Weeks 1-12) 435 items Operation Typhoon: Hitler's march on Moscow, October 1941 - Stahel, David, 2013 Book Introductory Bibliography (12 items) Conscience, dissent and reform in Soviet Russia - Boobbyer, Philip, 2005 Book Soviet communism from reform to collapse - Daniels, Robert V., 1995 Book The rise of Russia and the fall of the Soviet empire - Dunlop, John B., 1995 Book Russia and the idea of the West: Gorbachev, intellectuals, and the end of the Cold War - English, Robert D., 2000 Book Last of the empires: a history of the Soviet Union, 1945-1991 - Keep, John L. H., 1996 Book The Soviet tragedy: a history of socialism in Russia, 1917-1991 - Malia, Martin E., 1994 Book Russia's Cold War: from the October Revolution to the fall of the wall - Haslam, Jonathan, c2011 Book Rulers and victims: the Russians in the Soviet Union - Hosking, Geoffrey A., 2006 Book The shadow of war: Russia and the USSR, 1941 to the present - Lovell, Stephen, 2010 Book Lenin's tomb: the last days of the Soviet Empire - Remnick, David, 1994 Book Twentieth century Russia - Treadgold, Donald W., 1995 Book Zhivago's children: the last Russian intelligentsia - Zubok, V. M., 2009 1/34 10/01/21 After Stalin: The Decline and Fall of the Soviet Union (Weeks 1-12) | University of Kent Book Collections of documents (9 items) The Soviet political poster, 1917-1980: From the USSR Lenin Library Collection - Baburina, Nina, 1986 Book The Soviet system: from crisis to collapse - Dallin, Alexander, Lapidus, Gail Warshofsky, 1995 Book A documentary history of communism - Daniels, Robert Vincent, 1985 Book The great patriotic war of the Soviet Union, 1941-45: a documentary reader - Hill, Alexander, 2009 Book Revelations from the Russian archives: documents in English translation - Koenker, Diane, Bachman, Ronald D., Library of Congress, 1997 Book Sedition: everyday resistance in the Soviet Union under Khrushchev and Brezhnev - Kozlov, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Chechnya
    Russia Chechnya Population: 1,200,000 (Source: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in the Russian Federation, 2007, Inter-Agency Transitional Workplan for the North Caucasus. The population of Chechnya according to the 2002 Russian census was approximately 1,100,000.) Political Rights: 7 Civil Liberties: 7 Status: Not Free Overview: Deputy Prime Minister Ramzan Kadyrov was promoted to the Chechen premiership in March 2006 and continued to strengthen his hold on power in the republic. Critics like investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who was murdered in October, have claimed that Kadyrov and his security forces torture suspected rebels, many of whom disappear without a trace. Rebel violence declined as Kadyrov consolidated his position, and two important rebel leaders were killed during the year, but the larger region remained unstable. Chechnya, a small, partly mountainous North Caucasus republic, has a history of armed resistance to Russian rule dating to the czarist period. In February 1944, the Chechens were deported en masse to Kazakhstan after Soviet leader Joseph Stalin accused them of collaborating with Nazi German forces. Officially rehabilitated in 1957 and allowed to return to their homeland, they remained politically suspect and were excluded from the region’s administration. After winning election as Chechnya’s president in October 1991, former Soviet air force Major General Dzhokhar Dudayev proclaimed Chechnya’s independence. Moscow responded with an economic blockade. In 1994, Russia began assisting Chechens opposed to Dudayev, whose rule was marked by growing corruption and the rise of powerful clans and criminal gangs. Russian President Boris Yeltsin sent 40,000 troops into Chechnya by mid-December of that year and attacked the capital, Grozny.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2015
    INSIDE: Experts analyze efforts of Ukraine’s new prosecutor – page 3 Congressional delegation meets with Poroshenko – page 4 Special section: Ukrainian Debutante Balls – pages 9-11 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXIII No. 12 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MARCH 22, 2015 $2.00 Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ukraine’s minister of fi nance visits hears testimony on Ukraine policy D.C. to seek assistance for Ukraine Appearing on the first panel were Victoria Nuland, assistant secretary of state Frustration mounts for European and Eurasian affairs; Vice as Obama declines Admiral Frank Pandolfe, director for strate- gic plans and policy for the Joint Staff to provide lethal aid Pentagon; Brian P. McKeon, principal depu- ty undersecretary of defense for policy; and Ukrainian National Information Service Ramin Toloui, assistant secretary of trea- sury for international finance. WASHINGTON – The chairman of the Despite arguing that Ukraine figures Senate Foreign Relations Committee prominently in U.S. strategy in Europe and (SFRC), Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), called recounting the ways in which the U.S. is into session two panels to hear testimony offering economic support to Ukraine, the on President Barack Obama’s policy toward panelists did not say the U.S. is prepared to Ukraine to repel Russian aggression and offer Ukraine military assistance. It was push reform. Word of the president’s state- clear that the administration’s objective is ment in diplomatic channels in February to affect Russian behavior by diplomatic that his administration will not offer mili- means, which includes imposing sanctions tary assistance to Ukraine was the back- that will hurt Russia economically.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: a Comparison
    WELFARE REFORMS IN POST-SOVIET STATES: A COMPARISON OF SOCIAL BENEFITS REFORM IN RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN by ELENA MALTSEVA A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Elena Maltseva (2012) Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: A Comparison of Social Benefits Reform in Russia and Kazakhstan Elena Maltseva Doctor of Philosophy Political Science University of Toronto (2012) Abstract: Concerned with the question of why governments display varying degrees of success in implementing social reforms, (judged by their ability to arrive at coherent policy outcomes), my dissertation aims to identify the most important factors responsible for the stagnation of social benefits reform in Russia, as opposed to its successful implementation in Kazakhstan. Given their comparable Soviet political and economic characteristics in the immediate aftermath of Communism’s disintegration, why did the implementation of social benefits reform succeed in Kazakhstan, but largely fail in Russia? I argue that although several political and institutional factors did, to a certain degree, influence the course of social benefits reform in these two countries, their success or failure was ultimately determined by the capacity of key state actors to frame the problem and form an effective policy coalition that could further the reform agenda despite various political and institutional obstacles and socioeconomic challenges. In the case of Kazakhstan, the successful implementation of the social benefits reform was a result of a bold and skillful endeavour by Kazakhstani authorities, who used the existing conditions to justify the reform initiative and achieve the reform’s original objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE News Flash
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE News Flash AI Index: EUR 46/001/2005 (Public) News Service No: 017 20 January 2005 Russian Federation: Human rights group threatened by security forces Amnesty International is extremely concerned that eight activists working for the human rights group the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society are in danger of being arbitrarily arrested, tortured and "disappeared". This follows the seizure today of their contact information by Russian security forces. Officers from the Federal Security Service (FSB) raided the organisation's offices in Nizhny Novgorod at about 5pm local time and seized documents containing the contact details of all the staff of the group's newspaper. The contact details of eight staff members living in Chechnya were among those seized. The security forces also took away the newspaper's registration documents and some editions of the newspaper. Earlier in the day, the regional branch of the FSB in Nizhny Novgorod summoned Stanislav Dmitrievskii, the head of the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society for questioning. The FSB reportedly considers Stanislav Dmitrievskii a witness in a criminal case relating to materials published by the organization’s newspaper Pravozashchita. Details of the case are unclear but seem to relate to statements by Chechen opposition figures including Aslan Maskhadov and his UK-based envoy Akhmed Zakayev published by the organization’s newspaper. Amnesty International has reported on a worrying trend of Russian authorities targeting human rights defenders, activists and independent journalists, and in some cases subjecting them to extreme levels of harassment, "disappearances" and killings. Public Document **************************************** For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566 Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the EFFECTIVE USE of PROXY WARFARE by Andrew Lewis Peek Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 © 2021 Andrew Peek All Rights Reserved
    ON THE EFFECTIVE USE OF PROXY WARFARE by Andrew Lewis Peek A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 2021 Andrew Peek All rights reserved Abstract This dissertation asks a simple question: how are states most effectively conducting proxy warfare in the modern international system? It answers this question by conducting a comparative study of the sponsorship of proxy forces. It uses process tracing to examine five cases of proxy warfare and predicts that the differentiation in support for each proxy impacts their utility. In particular, it proposes that increasing the principal-agent distance between sponsors and proxies might correlate with strategic effectiveness. That is, the less directly a proxy is supported and controlled by a sponsor, the more effective the proxy becomes. Strategic effectiveness here is conceptualized as consisting of two key parts: a proxy’s operational capability and a sponsor’s plausible deniability. These should be in inverse relation to each other: the greater and more overt a sponsor’s support is to a proxy, the more capable – better armed, better trained – its proxies should be on the battlefield. However, this close support to such proxies should also make the sponsor’s influence less deniable, and thus incur strategic costs against both it and the proxy. These costs primarily consist of external balancing by rival states, the same way such states would balance against conventional aggression. Conversely, the more deniable such support is – the more indirect and less overt – the less balancing occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Father Alexander Men
    Father Alexander Men ANDREI DUBROV Father Alexander Men is well known in'Moscow, but not in the West. He is still young, not yet 40. After studying at a forestry institute in Siberia, he realized that a profession as a graduate in forestry was not for him. He was a believer, a man of great faith - and had been so since childhood. He was brought up in a believing family and his uncle was a priest. The call to the priesthood came to him when he realized that mis­ sionary work in the Soviet Union was his unquestionable duty. So he entered the seminary at Zagorsk. He excelled in his studies and ~radua­ ted in the early 1960s. After ordination he was sent to serve in the village of Tarasovka, 40 kilometres from Moscow, on the way to Zagorsk. All his parishioners quickly came to love the young priest for his kindness, his gentleness and his desire to help people in all he did and said. He had the ability to strike up a relationship with everyone. He is one of the most erudite people in Moscow, but he never parades it; with simple people he talks about things which are close to their hearts and which they under­ stand - a rare quality among modern Russian intellectuals. Gradually Father Alexander became known in Moscow itself. People started coming to his services from there. He is particularly loved by young people, by the new generation of young Russians, who continue to seek the truth as they did in the past. Many have seen through the com­ munist ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • War Against Terrorism and the Conflict in Chechnya: a Case for Distinction
    The War Against Terrorism and the Conflict in Chechnya: A Case for Distinction SVANTE E. CORNELL More than any other conflict, Chechnya epitomizes the old saying that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." Since the first Chechen war began in 1994, the Russian government has portrayed the war as one against ban- dits and Islamic fundamentalists. After the attacks of September 11, 2001, the label changed-now Chechens are referred to simply as "terrorists." Western states have for the most part thus far refrained from accepting the Russian position at face value, seeing the conflict primarily as an ethnic war. While recognizing Russia's territorial integrity, Western and Islamic states see the Chechen rebels as more or less legitimate representatives of the Chechen people, considering that the current Chechen president, Asian Maskhadov, was elected in elections deemed free and fair by international observers in 1997. Moreover, the international commu- nity has condemned the Russian military's massive human rights violations in the prosecution of the war. That said, during the course of the second war, which began in October 1999 and rages to this day, there has been an increasing concern with regard to the radicalization of parts of the Chechen resistance movement and its links to extremist Islamic groups in the Middle East. The attacks of September 11 introduced a new paradigm into world politics, and Chechnya has since been one of the regions most affected by the increased focus on terrorism. Indeed, it did not take long after 9/11 for the Russian government to draw comparisons between the terrorist attacks on the United States and the situa- tion in Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • File Is Composed of the Comfortable Class
    The English Radical Tradition and the British Left 1885-1945 ENDERBY, John Stephen Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/26096/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/26096/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. The English Radical Tradition and the British Left 1885-1945 by John Stephen Enderby A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2019 I hereby declare that: 1. I have not been enrolled for another award of the University, or other academic or professional organisation, whilst undertaking my research degree. 2. None of the material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award. 3. I am aware of and understand the University's policy on plagiarism and certify that this thesis is my own work. The use of all published or other sources of material consulted have been properly and fully acknowledged. 4. The work undertaken towards the thesis has been conducted in accordance with the SHU Principles of Integrity in Research and the SHU Research Ethics Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Peace to Chechnya? Assessments and Implications
    Order Code RL32272 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Bringing Peace to Chechnya? Assessments and Implications Updated February 11, 2005 Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Bringing Peace to Chechnya? Assessments and Implications Summary Russia’s then-Premier (and current President) Vladimir Putin ordered military, police, and security forces to enter the breakaway Chechnya region in September 1999, and these forces occupied most of the region by early 2000. The conflict has resulted in thousands of military and civilian casualties and the massive destruction of housing and infrastructure. Putin’s rise to power and continuing popularity have been tied at least partly to his perceived ability to prosecute this conflict successfully. In the run-up to Russian legislative elections in December 2003 and a presidential election in March 2004, Putin endeavored to demonstrate that peace had returned to the region. Since Chechen terrorists held hundreds of Moscow theater-goers hostage in late 2002, the Putin administration has appeared unequivocally opposed to talks with the rebels and more dedicated to establishing a pro-Moscow government in Chechnya. Such a government will use its own forces to battle the remaining rebels, ostensibly permitting the disengagement and withdrawal of most Russian troops from the region. This “Chechenization” of the conflict, along with related pacification efforts, constitute the main elements of the Russian government’s campaign to wind down the fighting. Pacification efforts aim to gain the support or acquiescence of the population to federal control and include rebuilding assistance and elections.
    [Show full text]