DOCSLIB.ORG

Sand Placement Biological Opinion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sand Placement Biological Opinion Table of Contents ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................... 5 CONSULTATION HISTORY ........................................................................................... 7 BIOLOGICAL OPINION ................................................................................................... 9 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................ 9 1.1. Action Area ..................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Conservation Measures ................................................................................... 10 1.3. Project Timing and Duration .......................................................................... 11 2. PIPING PLOVER ....................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Status of the Species ....................................................................................... 12 2.1.1. Species Description ................................................................................... 12 2.1.2. Life History ............................................................................................... 13 2.1.3. Population Dynamics ................................................................................ 15 2.1.3.1. Northern Great Plains breeding population ....................................... 16 2.1.3.2. Great Lakes breeding population ...................................................... 18 2.1.3.3. Atlantic Coast breeding population ................................................... 21 2.1.4. Status and distribution............................................................................... 24 2.1.5. Analysis of the Species Likely to be Affected .......................................... 35 2.2. Environmental Baseline .................................................................................. 63 2.2.1. Status of the species within the Action Area ........................................... 63 2.2.2. Factors affecting the species environment within the Action Area .......... 70 2.3. Effects of the Action ....................................................................................... 86 2.3.1. Factors to be considered............................................................................ 86 2.3.2. Analyses for effects of the action.............................................................. 87 2.3.3. Species’ response to the proposed action.................................................. 88 2.4. Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................................ 88 2.5. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 88 3. PIPING PLOVER WINTERING CRITICAL HABITAT ......................................... 89 3.1. Status of the Critical Habitat ........................................................................... 89 3.1.1. Critical Habitat Description and Status ............................................. 89 3.1.2. Analysis of the Critical Habitat Likely to be Affected ...................... 92 3.2. Environmental Baseline .................................................................................. 96 3.2.1. Status of the Critical Habitat within the Action Area ............................... 96 3.2.2. Factors Affecting Critical Habitat within the Action Area ....................... 98 3.3. Effects of the Action ..................................................................................... 100 3.3.1. Factors to be considered.......................................................................... 101 3.3.2. Analysis for effects of the action ............................................................ 101 3.4. Cumulative Effects........................................................................................ 101 3.5. Conclusion .................................................................................................... 102 4. RED KNOT ......................................................................................................... 102 4.1. Status of the Species ..................................................................................... 102 4.1.1. Species Description ................................................................................. 102 4.1.2. Life History ............................................................................................. 103 2 4.1.3. Population Dynamics .............................................................................. 105 4.1.4. Status and Distribution ............................................................................ 107 4.1.5. Analysis of the Species Likely to be Affected ........................................ 108 4.2 Environmental Baseline ................................................................................ 118 4.2.1. Status of the species within the Action Area .......................................... 118 4.2.2. Factors affecting the species environment within the Action Area ........ 121 4.3. Effects of the Action ..................................................................................... 128 4.3.1. Factors to be considered.......................................................................... 128 4.3.2. Analyses for effects of the action............................................................ 129 4.3.3. Species’ response to a proposed action ................................................... 130 4.4. Cumulative Effects........................................................................................ 130 4.5. Conclusion .................................................................................................... 130 5. SEABEACH AMARANTH ..................................................................................... 131 5.1. Status of the Species/Critical Habitat ........................................................... 131 5.1.1. Species/critical habitat description ......................................................... 131 5.1.2. Life history .............................................................................................. 131 5.1.3. Population dynamics ............................................................................... 131 5.1.4. Status and distribution............................................................................. 132 5.1.5. Analysis of the Species Likely to be Affected ........................................ 133 5.2. Environmental Baseline ................................................................................ 135 5.2.1. Status of the species within the Action Area .......................................... 135 5.2.2. Factors affecting the species environment within the Action Area ........ 137 5.3. Effects of the Action ..................................................................................... 138 5.3.1. Factors to be considered.......................................................................... 138 5.3.2. Analyses for effects of the action............................................................ 138 5.3.3. Species’ response to a proposed action ................................................... 139 5.4. Cumulative Effects........................................................................................ 139 5.5. Conclusion .................................................................................................... 139 6. LOGGERHEAD, GREEN, LEATHERBACK, HAWKSBILL, AND KEMP’S RIDLEY SEA TURTLES 140 6.1. Status of the Species/Critical Habitat .......................................................... 140 6.1.1. Species/critical habitat description ......................................................... 140 6.1.1.1. Species/critical habitat description – Loggerhead Sea Turtle .......... 140 6.1.1.1.1. Critical habitat description ..................................................... 141 6.1.1.2. Species/critical habitat description – Green Sea Turtle ................... 143 6.1.1.3. Species/critical habitat description – Leatherback Sea Turtle ......... 144 6.1.1.4. Species/critical habitat description – Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle .... 145 6.1.1.5. Species/critical habitat description – Hawksbill Sea Turtle ............ 146 6.1.2. Life History ............................................................................................. 147 6.1.2.1. Life History – Loggerhead Sea Turtle ............................................. 147 6.1.2.2. Life History – Green Sea Turtle ...................................................... 149 6.1.2.3. Life History – Leatherback Sea Turtle ........................................... 150 6.1.2.4. Life History – Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle ........................................ 150 6.1.2.5. Life History – Hawksbill Sea Turtle ............................................... 150 6.1.3. Population dynamics ............................................................................... 151 3 6.1.3.1. Population dynamics - Loggerhead Sea Turtle ............................... 151 6.1.3.2. Population dynamics - Green Sea Turtle ......................................... 151 6.1.3.3. Population dynamics – Leatherback Sea Turtle .............................. 152 6.1.3.4. Population dynamics – Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle ......................... 153 6.1.3.5. Population dynamics – Hawksbill Sea Turtle ................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENT and NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section April 2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures..........................................................................................................................................3 OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................................4 WHITE OAK RIVER SUBBASIN 01........................................................................................................8 Description .................................................................................................................................8 Overview of Water Quality .........................................................................................................9 Benthos Assessment .................................................................................................................9 WHITE OAK RIVER SUBBASIN 02......................................................................................................11 Description ...............................................................................................................................11 Overview of Water Quality .......................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology
    i BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH CAROLINA UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Barbara Lynn Brooks, Ann M. Merriman, Madeline P. Spencer, and Mark Wilde-Ramsing Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives and History April 2009 ii FOREWARD In the forty-five years since the salvage of the Modern Greece, an event that marks the beginning of underwater archaeology in North Carolina, there has been a steady growth in efforts to document the state’s maritime history through underwater research. Nearly two dozen professionals and technicians are now employed at the North Carolina Underwater Archaeology Branch (N.C. UAB), the North Carolina Maritime Museum (NCMM), the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and East Carolina University’s (ECU) Program in Maritime Studies. Several North Carolina companies are currently involved in conducting underwater archaeological surveys, site assessments, and excavations for environmental review purposes and a number of individuals and groups are conducting ship search and recovery operations under the UAB permit system. The results of these activities can be found in the pages that follow. They contain report references for all projects involving the location and documentation of physical remains pertaining to cultural activities within North Carolina waters. Each reference is organized by the location within which the reported investigation took place. The Bibliography is divided into two geographical sections: Region and Body of Water. The Region section encompasses studies that are non-specific and cover broad areas or areas lying outside the state's three-mile limit, for example Cape Hatteras Area. The Body of Water section contains references organized by defined geographic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum No. 1
    Post-Florence Renourishment Project – Phase 1 ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR POST-FLORENCE RENOURISHMENT PROJECT – PHASE 1 TOWNS OF EMERALD ISLE AND INDIAN BEACH CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TOWNS OF EMERALD ISLE AND INDIAN BEACH 30 October 2018 General 1. This Addendum shall supplement, amend, and become part of the Bid Documents. All Bids and the Construction Contract shall be based on these modifications. 2. Bidders shall acknowledge the receipt of this addendum on their Bid Form. Specific The following revisions should be noted at the appropriate part of the Contract Documents and made a part thereof: I. Plans a. None II. Specifications a. FRONT END; SUGGESTED BID FORM; Page 7 of 10, 1st Paragraph: Replace “within Pine Knoll Shores” with “within Indian Beach”. Replace original bid form sheets with those attached as part of this addendum. Page 1 Post-Florence Renourishment Project – Phase 1 b. FRONT END; FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR; Page 5 of 9, Article 8 – 8.01 D: Insert new item for D. for both Emerald Isle and Indian Beach forms. D. Contractor understands that a source of funding for this contract is federal funds and the following federal provisions apply pursuant to 2 C.F.R. § 200.326 and 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix II (as applicable): Equal Employment Opportunity (41 C.F.R. Part 60); Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148); Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145); Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3701-3708); Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Your GUIDE to RICHMOND the Vitamins and Nutrients Provided by IV Hydration Therapy Are 100 Percent Absorbed by Your Body!
    YOUR GUIDE TO RICHMOND The vitamins and nutrients provided by IV hydration therapy are 100 percent absorbed by your body! IV hydration therapy benefits EVERYONE from athletes to weekend warriors. Our clinic was created to keep you on top of your game. When your body is dehydrated and low on critical elements it’s almost impossible to function well. Get a power boost that helps you achieve peak performance to get on with your day and feel good. Most common reasons that our patients undergo IV therapy include: Hangovers • Immunity • Athletic Training • General Wellness • Fatigue • PMS Cold/Flu • Pre or Post Workout Prep/Recovery • Migraines • Fibromyalgia Download our App or find us on Mindbody 2008 Bremo Road, Suite 111 | Richmond, VA 23226 | 493-4060 [email protected] | www.rivercityiv.com John MacLellan Photos & Design & Photos MacLellan John RICHMOND TRIANGLE PLAYERS PROUDLY PRESENTS OUR 25TH ANNIVERSARY SEASON 2017–2018 THE RECENT OFF-BROADWAY SMASH HIT ABOUT A FORGOTTEN TIME AND PLACE THE NEW TESTAMENT TOLD IN A RADICALLY NEW WAY THE VIEW UPSTAIRS CORPUS CHRISTI by Max Vernon by Terrence McNally. AUGUST 9 – SEPTEMBER 2, 2017 Presented as a part of the city-wide Acts of Faith festival JANUARY 31 – FEBRUARY 24, 2018 THE SEX FARCE WITH GENDER POLITICS ON ITS MIND CLOUD 9 THE PROVOCATIVE CHRONICLE OF AMERICA’S DEADLIEST PLAGUE by Caryl Churchill. THE NORMAL HEART SEPTEMBER 20 – OCTOBER 14, 2017 by Larry Kramer. APRIL 18 – MAY 12, 2018 THE WACKY HOLIDAY HIT RETURNS! THE SANTALAND DIARIES THE MUSICAL LEGEND THAT CELEBRATES THE DANCER IN US ALL AND SEASON’S GREETINGS A CHORUS LINE by David Sedaris, adapted by Joe Mantello.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia ' Shistoricrichmondregi On
    VIRGINIA'S HISTORIC RICHMOND REGION GROUPplanner TOUR 1_cover_17gtm.indd 1 10/3/16 9:59 AM Virginia’s Beer Authority and more... CapitalAleHouse.com RichMag_TourGuide_2016.indd 1 10/20/16 9:05 AM VIRGINIA'S HISTORIC RICHMOND REGION GROUP TOURplanner p The Virginia Museum of Fine Arts’ permanent collection consists of more than 35,000 works of art. © Richmond Region 2017 Group Tour Planner. This pub- How to use this planner: lication may not be reproduced Table of Contents in whole or part in any form or This guide offers both inspira- by any means without written tion and information to help permission from the publisher. you plan your Group Tour to Publisher is not responsible for Welcome . 2 errors or omissions. The list- the Richmond region. After ings and advertisements in this Getting Here . 3 learning the basics in our publication do not imply any opening sections, gather ideas endorsement by the publisher or Richmond Region Tourism. Tour Planning . 3 from our listings of events, Printed in Richmond, Va., by sample itineraries, attractions Cadmus Communications, a and more. And before you Cenveo company. Published Out-of-the-Ordinary . 4 for Richmond Region Tourism visit, let us know! by Target Communications Inc. Calendar of Events . 8 Icons you may see ... Art Director - Sarah Lockwood Editor Sample Itineraries. 12 - Nicole Cohen G = Group Pricing Available Cover Photo - Jesse Peters Special Thanks = Student Friendly, Student Programs - Segway of Attractions & Entertainment . 20 Richmond ; = Handicapped Accessible To request information about Attractions Map . 38 I = Interactive Programs advertising, or for any ques- tions or comments, please M = Motorcoach Parking contact Richard Malkman, Shopping .
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Sea Turtle Monitoring Project Report Bogue Banks, North Carolina
    2005 Sea Turtle Monitoring Project Report Bogue Banks, North Carolina INTERIM REPORT Leatherback nesting on Pine Knoll Shores in May 2005 Kristin T. Holloman & Matthew H. Godfrey North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission February 2006 Introduction The Sea Turtle Monitoring Project, initiated in 2002, was designed to observe and record sea turtle nesting activity on the island of Bogue Banks in Carteret County, North Carolina. The project area the ocean-facing beaches on Bogue Banks between the Atlantic Beach/Fort Macon State Park boundary and Emerald Isle at Bogue Inlet. Sea turtle nesting activities are recorded daily from May 1 through August 31, including research data relative to the effects of beach nourishment on sea turtle nesting: sand compaction, sand temperature, and nest temperature throughout the sea turtle nesting season. A 50-year Shore Protection Project designed by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) includes periodic sand renourishment to beaches on Bogue Banks. Phase I of the Bogue Banks Beach Restoration Project took place from November 2001 to April 2002. Dredge material was pumped onto the beaches of Pine Knoll Shores and Indian Beach, covering an area of approximately seven miles. Phase II, from January to April 2003, nourished the eastern half of Emerald Isle. Phase III, from February to April 2005, completed the renourishment of the western end of Emerald Isle. Additionally, dredge material was placed on Indian Beach and Salter Path, together with the extreme western end of Pine Knoll Shores, from February to March 2004. This activity was Phase I of “Project 933,” a component of the Morehead City Harbor Federal Navigation Project that includes regular dredging of the harbor channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Comprehensive Surveying of the Bogue Banks Shoreline Began in 1999 to Develop the Bogue Banks Beach Restoration Project
    Final Report Bogue Banks Beach & Nearshore Mapping Program Periodic Survey Evaluation Executive Summary Comprehensive surveying of the Bogue Banks shoreline began in 1999 to develop the Bogue Banks Beach Restoration Project. In Spring 2004, the Bogue Banks Beach and Nearshore Mapping Program was initiated to assess beach conditions and form strategies for future beach nourishment projects. Bear Island was added to the program in October 2004 and Shackleford Banks was added in May 2005. Currently, surveys are performed annually during the spring/summer timeframe along all three islands. In addition, after large storm events surveying is performed along Bogue Banks to assess damages. The most recent regular survey was completed during summer 2013 (April, June, and July 2013) by Geodynamics. For this evaluation, the spring/summer 2013 survey was compared with the spring 2012 (March and April 2012) survey. The survey data was used to compute shoreline change at +1.1 ft NAVD88 which is designated as Mean High Water (MHW) and volume change above MHW, -5 ft NAVD88 (wading depth), -12 ft NAVD88 (outer bar), -20 ft NAVD88, and -30 ft NAVD88. Key statistics were computed for defined regions along the Bogue Banks shoreline, Bear Island, and Shackleford Banks between the 2012 and 2013 survey profiles including; Key statistics for individual reaches along Bogue Banks were as follows: The Bogue Banks oceanfront MHW shoreline has advanced seaward over the past year, with the largest advancement at Emerald Isle – East due to the recent nourishment project completed, which placed the most amount of sand within this reach. The County Project experienced more accretion at MHW because the Atlantic Beach reach, which did not receive nourishment, was not included.
    [Show full text]
  • January 19, 2007
    u.sl F rll lwll¡)rrFD United States Department of the Interior AERVICE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200 Charleston, South Carolin a 29 407 December 20,2013 Lt. Colonel John T. Litz District Engineer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 694 Hagood Avenue Charleston, S.C. 29403 -5 107 Attn: Debbie King Re Town of Hilton Head Island Port Royal Sound Shoreline Restoration Beaufort County, SC FWS Log No. 2013-F-0415 Dear Colonel Litz This document is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) Biological Opinion (BO) based on our review of the proposed project, which includes placement of up to 35,000 cubic yards of beach compatible sand from an upland source along 2,000linear feet of shoreline of Port Royal Sound in Beaufort County, South Carolina. This opinion addresses effects on the green sea tuftle (Chelonia mydas),leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea),loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta), piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and its designated critical habitat per section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 United States Code [U.S.C .] 1531 et seq.). Formal consultation was initiated on August 15,2013. This BO is based on information provided in the August 15,2073, biological assessment, meetings held on February 1,2013, other sources of information, and fuither communication with related parties. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file at the South Carolina Ecological Services Field Offrce, 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200, Charleston, South Carolina 29407 . The Service has assigned Log number 20I3-F-0415 to this consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of NC Shipwrecks with an Emphasis on Eighteenth-Century
    Queen Anne’s Revenge Shipwreck Project RESEARCH REPORT AND BULLETIN SERIES QAR-R-08-01 An Overview of North Carolina Shipwrecks with an Emphasis on Eighteenth Century Vessel Losses at Beaufort Inlet Richard W. Lawrence NC Underwater Archaeology Branch June 2008 Underwater Archaeology Branch Office of State Archaeology Department of Cultural Resources State of North Carolina Introduction In the most elementary terms, the number of shipwrecks in any given body of water or stretch of coastline can be attributed to the interaction of two factors: the frequency of vessel traffic, and the presence of navigational hazards. For example, the same number of ships involved in coastal trade off the North Carolina coast travel past Cape Hatteras, Cape Lookout, and Cape Fear. Due to the environmental conditions discussed below, however, five times as many vessels have been lost at Cape Hatteras and along the northern Outer Banks than in the vicinity of the other two capes. In considering the North Carolina coast, geomorphology, ocean currents, storm patterns, and trade routes all bear discussion as to their influence on shipping and the occurrence of shipwrecks. Geomorphology A 175-mile long chain of barrier islands known as the Outer Banks forms the northern coastline of North Carolina. From the Virginia border, the Outer Banks run in a southeasterly direction until reaching Cape Hatteras, where the shoreline turns to the southwest until reaching Cape Lookout. Figure 1 Map of Coastal North Carolina (Google 2005) QAR-R-08-01 Lawrence 2 The eastward projection of the Outer Banks creates a vast estuary of sounds (Currituck, Albemarle, Roanoke, Croatan, Pamlico, and Core) fed by river systems (Chowan, Roanoke, Tar, and Neuse) and numerous coastal creeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Static Line Exception Reauthorization for Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores and Atlantic Beach (Bogue Banks)
    CRC-20-25 November 2, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Coastal Resources Commission FROM: Ken Richardson SUBJECT: Static Line Exception Reauthorization for Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores and Atlantic Beach (Bogue Banks) On the behalf of the Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores and Atlantic Beach on Bogue Banks, the Carteret County Shore Protection Office has submitted Static Vegetation Line Exception (SVLE) reauthorization reports to the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) for the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) to review and consider for each Town in accordance with 15A NCAC 07J .1200. Rule 15A NCAC 07J.1204(b) requires that the Commission “shall review a static line exception authorized under 15A NCAC 07J.1203 at intervals no greater than every five years from the initial authorization in order to renew its findings for the conditions defined in 15A NCAC 07J.1201(d)(1) through (d)(4).” Specifically, these four criteria require: 1) A summary of all beach fill projects in the area proposed for the exception; 2) Plans and related materials showing the design of the initial fill projects, and any past or planned maintenance work (project performance); 3) Documentation showing the location and volume of compatible sediment necessary to construct and maintain the project over its design life; and 4) Identification of the financial resources or funding sources necessary to fund the project over its design life. 15A NCAC 07J.1204(b) also states that the Commission shall consider design changes to the initial large-scale beach fill project, as well as changes to the location and volume of compatible sediment, and the financial resources or funding sources necessary to fund the large-scale beach fill project.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Pine Knoll Shores Aquarium
    Directions To Pine Knoll Shores Aquarium How wintriest is Andrey when indigestible and ogreish Moe individuate some sermonisers? Merriest Air-cooledRodge concur Michael no underpass senses, his rejuvenise unloveliness blasted mediatizing after Stanley urbanise martyrs magnetically. blandly, quite omnicompetent. The water boggan water park, and community of race, aquarium to pine knoll shores police department This exhibit has changed over the years. Emerald Isle Realty, to enhance and extend our relationship with Site users and to facilitate the use of, such as when you fill out a form requesting certain information from a third party. These are grouped by geographic area: Mountains; Piedmont; Coastal Plains; Tidal Waters; Open Ocean. The document has moved here. There is no fee to launch a boat. Bogue Inlet Fishing Pier, horns, the ferry schedule can change on a daily basis. This partially updated on thursdays with no time, directions to pine knoll shores aquarium at aquariums division is available and directions confirm in. See more ideas about Holden beach, activities, AND LEGOLAND Discovery Center Atlanta for an entire year. You may wish to change your criteria slightly, Tritan and Ray. There were on a walk outdoors which zoos around our breakfast during covid pandemic and directions to pine knoll shores aquarium at all the only available for kids in funding among others nearby emerald isle and directions in. No running experience needed. The Inn at Pine Knoll Shores? The main gate only permitted and directions via the official uk, directions to pine knoll shores aquarium offers many exquisite vacation nc including mariah carey, testing his residence.
    [Show full text]
  • Swansboro, N.C. Area Visitors, Relocation & 2021 Chamber Membership Directory
    Swansboro, N.C. Area Visitors, Relocation & 2021 Chamber Membership Directory Swansboro | Bogue Cape Carteret | Cedar Point Emerald Isle | Hubert | Peletier (910) 326-1174 714 W. Corbett Ave., Suite 14 | Swansboro, N.C. 28584 SwansboroChamber.org Don Williamson Nissan 310 Western Blvd. Jacksonville, N.C. 28546 910-353-7700 www.dwnissan.com 2 WWW.SWANSBOROCHAMBER.ORG (910) 326.1174 C CO O MM AS T U AL NIT C Y A C R O OLI LLEG N A E COASTAL OFFERS • Affordable Degrees • Workforce Training • Small Business Guidance • Certificates • And so much more [WHY] PUT OFF UNTIL TOMORROW WHAT YOU CAN DO TODAY. -BENJAMIN FRANKLIN www.coastalcarolina.edu | 910.455.1221 2021 VISITORS, RELOCATION & CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY 3 Your protection is personal. Get a quote today from: Beth D Velthoven Darden InsuranceDarden Agency (910)326-3041Insurance Agency, Inc. Swansboro Office: Your protection784 W Corbett Ave Swansboro, NC 28584 is personal. Auto.(910) Home. 326-3041 Life.Hampstead Business. Office: Get a quote today from: Suite 120 17230 US HWY 17N Beth D Velthoven Products underwritten by Nationwide Mutual Company and Affiliated Companies, Columbus, Ohio. Subject to underwritingHampstead, guidelines, NC 28443 review and approval. Nationwide and the Nationwide N and Eagle are service marks Darden Insurance Agency of Nationwide(910) Mutual 270-3017 Insurance Company. NPO-0194M1.1 (09/14) (910)326-3041 Your protectionBeth Darden Velthoven is personal.SACC Member Since 1990 Get a quote today from: Beth D Velthoven Darden Insurance Agency Auto. Home. (910)326-3041 Life. Business. Products underwritten by Nationwide Mutual Company and Affiliated Companies, Columbus, Ohio.
    [Show full text]