Taxonomic Study of Lambertella (Rutstroemiaceae, Helotiales) and Allied Substratal Stroma Forming Fungi from Japan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Taxonomic Study of Lambertella (Rutstroemiaceae, Helotiales) and Allied Substratal Stroma Forming Fungi from Japan 著者 趙 彦傑 内容記述 この博士論文は全文公表に適さないやむを得ない事 由があり要約のみを公表していましたが、解消した ため、2017年8月23日に全文を公表しました。 year 2014 その他のタイトル 日本産Lambertella属および基質性子座を形成する 類縁属の分類学的研究 学位授与大学 筑波大学 (University of Tsukuba) 学位授与年度 2013 報告番号 12102甲第6938号 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00123740 Taxonomic Study of Lambertella (Rutstroemiaceae, Helotiales) and Allied Substratal Stroma Forming Fungi from Japan A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Tsukuba in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Agricultural Science (Doctoral Program in Biosphere Resource Science and Technology) Yan-Jie ZHAO Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1–1 The genus Lambertella in Rutstroemiaceae .................................................................... 1 1–2 Taxonomic problems of Lambertella .............................................................................. 5 1–3 Allied genera of Lambertella ........................................................................................... 7 1–4 Objectives of the present research ................................................................................. 12 Chapter 2 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................ 17 2–1 Collection and isolation ................................................................................................. 17 2–2 Morphological examination .......................................................................................... 17 2–3 Observation of cultural characteristics .......................................................................... 18 2–4 DNA extraction .............................................................................................................. 18 2–5 PCR and sequencing ...................................................................................................... 19 2–6 Phylogenetic analyses .................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 3 Results and discussion ............................................................................................. 22 3–1 Identification of the collected materials ........................................................................ 22 3–2 Morphological characters of collected materials ........................................................... 22 3–3 Substratal stroma formation in culture .......................................................................... 23 3–4 Phylogenetic analysis .................................................................................................... 24 3–4–1 Phylogenetic analysis inferred from ITS-5.8S dataset ........................................... 24 3–4–2 Phylogenetic analysis inferred from individual dataset of LSU, RPB2, and the combined dataset of LSU and RPB2 ................................................................................ 26 3–5 Taxonomy ...................................................................................................................... 32 3–5–1 Delimitation of Lambertella sensus stricto ............................................................ 32 3–5–2 Crassitunica Y. -J. Zhao & T. Hosoya .................................................................... 33 3–5–3 Brunneimargo Y. -J. Zhao & T. Hosoya .................................................................. 36 3–5–4 Luteidiscella Y. -J. Zhao & T. Hosoya .................................................................... 38 3–5–5 Hymenoscyphus yunnanense (S.H. Ou) Y.-J. Zhao & T. Hosoya .......................... 41 3–5–6 Rutstroemia pinicola (Y. Otani) Y.-J. Zhao & T. Hosoya ...................................... 43 Chapter 4 General discussion................................................................................................... 60 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 67 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 70 References ................................................................................................................................ 72 Appendix .................................................................................................................................. 83 Chapter 1 Introduction 1–1 The genus Lambertella in Rutstroemiaceae The phylum Ascomycota is the largest group of Fungi and is characterized by the production of ascospores within asci as a result of sexual production (Kirk et al. 2008). The number of fungal species is estimated to be 1.5 million and about two-thirds of these species are thought to be Ascomycota (Hawksworth 1991, 2001). The Ascomycota and other fungi play essential roles in most land-based ecosystems as decomposers (Deacon 2006). However, some Ascomycota also interact with other organisms. Most species of Ascomycota are lichen-forming fungi, some are saprotrophs or parasites, and a few have mycorrhizal associations (Wang et al. 2006). Helotiales is one of the largest non-lichen-forming ascomycetes, which include some saprotrophic and parasitic species with highly divergent characters in their morphology, ecology, and biology (Wang et al. 2006). Morphological characters such as the shape and color of the apothecia have been useful for characterizing the families of Helotiales (Dennis 1968; Korf 1973; Wang et al. 2006). However, classifications in Helotiales based on the apothecial morphology are not always consistent with cellular, ultrastructural or molecular characters (Verkley 1994; Wang et al. 2005, 2006), thus further studies are needed to determine the taxonomy of Helotiales. The stroma is a complex hyphal structure that characterizes the three major families in Helotiales: Helotiaceae, Sclerotiniaceae, and Rutstroemiaceae. The primary function of the stroma is thought to be food storage (Whetzel 1945), but it also enables the survival of fungi in stressful environments. Based on morphology, two types of 1 stroma are recognized in Helotiales: sclerotial stroma and substratal stroma (Fig. 1.1). Sclerotial stroma is a determinate, tough structure that is often pellet-shaped, which comprises the medulla with a hyphal structure that is covered by a cortex of pigmented cells known as the rind. The sclerotial stroma is readily distinguishable from the substrate. The substratal stroma is an indeterminate structure, where a portion of the substrate is found in the medulla, which is usually surrounded by a black rind of differentiated cells. The substratal stroma is visible on the surfaces of dead leaves, petioles, branches, and fruits as black patches or crusts, or as irregular areas delimited by an irregular, thin, black line. Initially, most of the apothecial fungi with inoperculate asci and without remarkable structures such as hair were placed in the family Helotiaceae (Höhnel 1918). Subsequently, the family Sclerotiniaceae was separated from Helotiaceae to include species with stroma, either substratal or sclerotial (Whetzel 1945). With the development of molecular methods, members with substratal or sclerotial stroma were shown to be a different group based on studies of western hybridizations and molecular phylogenetic analyses (Carbone and Kohn 1993; Holst-Jensen et al. 1997; Kohn and Grenville 1989a, b). According to phylogenetic analyses, the family Rutstroemiaceae was separated from Sclerotiniaceae to include members with substratal stroma, whereas species with sclerotial stroma remained in the family Sclerotiniaceae (Holst-Jensen et al. 1997). Sclerotiniaceae comprises 284 species from 47 genera (Kirk et al. 2008), including many economically important plant pathogens, such as Sclerotinia, Botryotinia, and Monilia (Holst-Jensen et al. 1997; Whetzel 1945). By contrast, most of the species in Rutstroemiaceae are saprotrophs, rarely necrotrophic or biotrophic parasites. Most 2 members of Rutstroemiaceae form small and dark-colored apothecia, thus there has been little taxonomic research concerning Rutstroemiaceae. At present, only seven genera and 233 species have been reported in Rutstroemiaceae (Kirk et al. 2008). Compared with other families in Helotiales, the number of genera is remarkably low, thereby suggesting possibly inappropriate generic taxonomy. Lambertella is one of the largest groups in the family Rutstroemiaceae, with 63 species (Kirk et al. 2008). It was erected by von Höhnel (1918) for the single species Lambertella corni-maris Höhn., and it remained monotypic for a long time until Whetzel (1943) first monographed Lambertella with eight species. Dumont (1971) monographed the genus with 29 species based on a large number of specimens and a detailed, clear definition of Lambertella was provided. Korf and Zhuang (1985) followed Dumont’s definition of Lambertella and constructed a synoptic key of the 47 species known by that time. Since then, 16 new species have been added by various authors, but there has been no comprehensive taxonomic research subsequently after Dumont (1971). Definition of Lambertella provided by Dumont (1971) was: Lambertella Höhn., Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturw. Kl., Abt. 1 127: 375 [47