DOCSLIB.ORG

Expanded Discovery in Criminal Cases Emerges As a Low Tal to All Defendants, Innocent Defendants Are Par- Cost, High Benefit Public Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Expanded Discovery in Criminal Cases Emerges As a Low Tal to All Defendants, Innocent Defendants Are Par- Cost, High Benefit Public Policy THE JUSTICE PROJECT Expanded Wrongfully convicted for the rape and murder of a young Discovery in girl, Clarence Brandley spent nearly ten years on death row Criminal Cases before being exonerated. A Policy Review Prosecutors failed to disclose exculpatory evidence that placed other suspects at the scene of the crime. Expanded discovery laws could have prevented this injustice. Introduction .............................................. 1 Recommendations & Solutions........ 2 Grounds for Reform .............................. 3 The Legal Landscape .......................... 6 Benefits & Costs .................................... 9 Profiles of Injustice .............................. 10 Snapshots of Success ........................ 15 Voices of Support ................................ 17 Questions & Answers ........................ 19 A Model Policy...................................... 21 Literature ................................................ 26 THE JUSTICE PROJECT INTRODUCTION n criminal cases, discovery is the formal process by ply upon the location of the trial. Not only does the Iwhich the defense and prosecution exchange infor- timing of disclosures vary from jurisdiction to jurisdic- mation relevant to a criminal investigation. The tion, but it often remains dependent upon the individual exchange of relevant evidence is a critical component policies of the prosecutor or the competence of an indi- of investigation and trial preparation. Discovery pro- vidual’s defense counsel. vides pertinent information allowing each side to ade- The rules that codify civil and criminal procedure are quately prepare for the prospect of a trial and it gives different in state and federal courts, but in both instances the defendant information on how to plead. Through civil procedure actually provides more expansive rights to the process, discovery helps the criminal justice sys- discovery. For example, in civil trials parties may depose tem reach reliable outcomes efficiently in criminal the other party and the other party’s witnesses. This rule cases. The necessity of adequate discovery flows from simply does not exist in most states for criminal trials. the principle upon which the criminal justice system Moreover, civil procedure often mandates discovery is founded — the presumption of innocence. timelines adequate for counsel to evaluate and scruti- By requiring the timely exchange of all information nize evidence. The fact that discovery laws are so broad collected by the police and prosecution in criminal in civil cases and are often so restrictive in criminal cases cases, expanded discovery laws can provide for a more — where the freedom and, sometimes, the life of the fair and accurate criminal justice system. American defendant are at stake — is as nonsensical as it is unjust. criminal jurisprudence is predicated upon the presump- Discovery is a crucial procedural safeguard that tion of innocence. Because an individual is presumed protects against wrongful imprisonment, helps to innocent until convicted by a court of law, the prosecu- make the legal system more transparent by increasing tion alone bears the burden of proof. The state must pretrial disclosure, and ensures a fair procedure by present evidence that the accused is guilty beyond a rea- allowing each side in a trial to adequately prepare their sonable doubt. The presumption of innocence is seri- case. Alternatively, inadequate discovery laws threaten ously damaged when the defense is given insufficient the reliability of outcomes in criminal cases and signif- opportunity to cast doubt upon the prosecution’s case. icantly undermine a defendant’s right to due process. Only through adequate discovery can counsel subject Adequate discovery laws also mitigate other common evidence to appropriate scrutiny and give the accused a reasons for wrongful convictions, such as eyewitness meaningful opportunity to challenge and test evidence misidentification and false confessions. Expanded dis- in a fair hearing before a court of law. Similarly, through covery allows the defense to adequately and vigorous- a process of reciprocal discovery, the defense may also ly challenge evidence and increases the likelihood that be required to turn over information to the prosecution. misleading or exculpatory evidence will be caught and Such information may regard, inter alia, witnesses the handled appropriately when considering pleas and at defense intends to call at trial. It is vital, however, that trial. Additionally, while expanded criminal discovery reciprocal disclosure violate neither attorney-client laws help ensure a more fair and accurate legal system, privilege nor the Fifth Amendment right not to give legal practitioners in jurisdictions with more open dis- self-incriminating testimony. covery rules also report a more efficient process, with Rules identifying what qualifies as “discoverable” fewer reversals and retrials, and more cases resolved material in criminal trials, and when it must be earlier in the process. In short, expanded discovery exchanged, are determined in large part by state statutes, practices also enhance judicial efficiency. with some guidance from the United States Supreme This policy review seeks to inspire communica- Court. Most states have formal rules establishing what tion among criminal justice stakeholders, policymak- information the prosecution must disclose to the defense ers, and others regarding the best practices and meth- and, if a state provides for reciprocal discovery, vice ods for improving access to evidence through expand- versa. Variation in what type of information and mate- ed discovery. By employing the reforms highlighted rials the defense is entitled to receive under law depends in this review, policymakers can build a fairer, more not only on the charge itself, but also, in large part, sim- robust, and more accurate criminal justice system. 1 WWW.THEJUSTICEPROJECT.ORG THE JUSTICE PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS & SOLUTIONS iscovery is the formal process by which evidence all unprivileged information that (with due diligence) is Dis exchanged between the defense and prosecu- known or should be known to the prosecution, law tion prior to trial. In a civil suit, a defendant has broad enforcement agencies acting on behalf of the prosecu- discovery rights including access to witness statements, tion, or other agencies such as forensics testing labora- prior claims filed against either party, police reports, tories working for the prosecution. An open-file policy and the right to depose third parties.1 In criminal cases reduces discretionary decisions in determining what in most states, however, discovery is much narrower. evidence is “material” (meaning that it will affect the Access to evidence held by the police and the prosecu- outcome of trial) and “exculpatory” (meaning that it will tion may often be significantly restricted. Discovery in tend to negate guilt or mitigate a sentence) and should criminal cases often does not include information on thus be disclosed to the defense. By allowing the witnesses, police reports, or mitigating and aggravating defense access to the state’s entire file, open-file discov- evidence, all of which could affect the outcome of a ery reduces the potential for error and the inefficiencies trial, as well as lessen inherent in making the decisions or increase the sen- Discovery in criminal cases on an item-by-item basis. tence imposed after a conviction. Where this often does not include AUTOMATIC AND evidence is discover- information on witnesses, MANDATORY DISCLOSURES able, it is often too late police reports, or mitigating In addition to full, open-file in the process to be of discovery, states should adopt any practical use to the and aggravating evidence, all rules requiring mandatory and defense. Mandatory of which could affect the automatic disclosure of certain and open-file discov- specified information in crimi- ery, in which prosecu- outcome of a trial, as well as nal cases. In 1994, the American tors make their entire lessen or increase the sentence Bar Association (ABA) issued case file available to imposed after a conviction. new standards related to crimi- the defense and dis- nal discovery, which were prom- close particular items ulgated in recognition of a at required times, leads to a more efficient criminal jus- growing state and federal trend toward expanding tice system that better protects against wrongful pretrial discovery in criminal cases. For example, the imprisonment and renders more reliable convictions. ABA recommends disclosure of tangible objects; To prevent wrongful convictions, and improve information related to witnesses, including names, efficiency in the criminal justice system, it is neces- addresses, and statements; expert witness informa- sary that discovery laws be as expansive as possible at tion, including qualifications, reports, and results of the pretrial phase and that they be uniform, manda- physical or mental examinations; and materials relat- tory, and enforced. The following recommendations ed to sentencing (meaning evidence related to aggra- represent best practices for discovery in criminal vating or mitigating factors that could increase or cases. By implementing these standards, states would reduce the possible punishment). considerably enhance the reliability of outcomes in States should adopt rules that closely mirror the criminal cases. ABA standards in terms of mandatory disclosures, making clear the duty of the state to obtain all OPEN-FILE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Shadow Rules of Joinder
    Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship 2012 The hS adow Rules of Joinder Robin Effron Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation 100 Geo. L. J. 759 (2011-2012) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. The Shadow Rules of Joinder ROBIN J. EFFRON* The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide litigants with procedural devices for joining claims and parties. Several of these rules demand that the claims or parties share a baseline of commonality, either in the form of the same "transactionor occurrence" or a "common question of law or fact." Both phrases have proved to be notoriously tricky in application.Commentators from the academy and the judiciary have attributed these difficulties to the context- specific and discretionary nature of the rules. This Article challenges that wisdom by suggesting that the doctrinal confu- sion can be attributed to deeper theoretical divisions in the judiciary, particu- larly with regardto the role of the ontological categories of "fact" and "law." These theoretical divisions have led lower courtjudges to craft shadow rules of joinder "Redescription" is the rule by which judges utilize a perceived law-fact distinction to characterizea set of facts as falling inside or outside a definition of commonality. "Impliedpredominance" is the rule in which judges have taken the Rule 23(b)(3) class action standard that common questions predominate over individual issues and applied it to other rules of joinder that do not have this express requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presumption of Innocence As a Counterfactual Principle Ferry De Jong & Leonie Van Lent*
    This article is published in a peer-reviewed section of the Utrecht Law Review The Presumption of Innocence as a Counterfactual Principle Ferry de Jong & Leonie van Lent* 1. Introduction The presumption of innocence is widely, if not universally, recognized as one of the central principles of criminal justice, which is evidenced by its position in all international and regional human rights treaties as a standard of fair proceedings.1 Notwithstanding this seemingly firm normative position, there are strong indications that the presumption of innocence is in jeopardy on a practical as well as on a normative level. The presumption of innocence has always been much discussed, but in the last decade the topic has generated a particularly significant extent of academic work, both at the national and at the international level.2 The purport of the literature on this topic is twofold: many authors discuss developments in law and in the practice of criminal justice that curtail suspects’ rights and freedoms, and criticize these developments as being violations of the presumption of innocence. Several other authors search for the principle’s normative meaning and implications, some of whom take a critical stance on narrow interpretations of the principle, whereas others assert – by sometimes totally differing arguments – that the presumption of innocence has and should have a more limited normative meaning and scope than is generally attributed to it. An important argument for narrowing down the principle’s meaning or scope of application is the risk involved in a broad conception and a consequently broad field of applicability, viz. that its specific normative value becomes overshadowed and that concrete protection is hampered instead of furthered.3 The ever-increasing international interest in the topic is reflected also in the regulatory interest in the topic on the EU level.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Handbook of Rules and Regulations
    OFFICIAL HANDBOOK OF RULES AND REGULATIONS 2021 | 69th EDITION AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE An American Quarter Horse possesses acceptable pedigree, color and mark- ings, and has been issued a registration certificate by the American Quarter Horse Association. This horse has been bred and developed to have a kind and willing disposition, well-balanced conformation and agile speed. The American Quarter Horse is the world’s most versatile breed and is suited for a variety of purposes - from working cattle on ranches to international reining competition. There is an American Quarter Horse for every purpose. AQHA MISSION STATEMENT • To record and preserve the pedigrees of the American Quarter Horse, while maintaining the integrity of the breed and welfare of its horses. • To provide beneficial services for its members that enhance and encourage American Quarter Horse ownership and participation. • To develop diverse educational programs, material and curriculum that will position AQHA as the leading resource organization in the equine industry. • To generate growth of AQHA membership via the marketing, promo- tion, advertising and publicity of the American Quarter Horse. • To ensure the American Quarter Horse is treated humanely, with dignity, respect and compassion, at all times. FOREWORD The American Quarter Horse Association was organized in 1940 to collect, record and preserve the pedigrees of American Quarter Horses. AQHA also serves as an information center for its members and the general public on matters pertaining to shows, races and projects designed to improve the breed and aid the industry, including seeking beneficial legislation for its breeders and all horse owners. AQHA also works to promote horse owner- ship and to grow markets for American Quarter Horses.
    [Show full text]
  • How a Confluence of Social Movements Convinced North Carolina to Go Where the Mccleskey Court Wouldnâ•Žt
    Michigan State University College of Law Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law Faculty Publications 1-1-2011 Confronting Race: How a Confluence of Social Movements Convinced North Carolina to Go where the McCleskey Court Wouldn’t Barbara O'Brien Michigan State University College of Law, [email protected] Catherine M. Grosso Michigan State University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.msu.edu/facpubs Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation Barbara O'Brien & Catherine M. Grosso, Confronting Race: How a Confluence of Social Movements Convinced North Carolina to Go where the McCleskey Court Wouldn’t, 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev. 463 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONFRONTING RACE: HOW A CONFLUENCE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS CONVINCED NORTH CAROLINA TO GO WHERE THE MCCLESKEY COURT WOULDN’T Barbara O’Brien & Catherine M. Grosso∗ 2011 MICH. ST. L. REV. 463 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 463 I. THE LONG STRUGGLE TO CONFRONT RACE IN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ........................................................................................... 467 A. The Constitutional Litigation Strategy Disappoints When the Court Won’t Bite .................................................................... 467 B. Back to Basics: A More Incremental Approach to Reform ......... 472 II. A CONFLUENCE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assignment2 Grading Criteria
    Assignment 2 - Grading Criteria 1. GUI (10 points) The GUI of the program has to contain the following elements: 1.1 Chess board and HelpÆAbout menu item (1 point) The GUI has to include a chess board and a HelpÆAbout menu item, which is used to show a window (form) with the version of the application and some additional information about the program (e.g. your name). Note: This dialog is used to test the responsiveness of the GUI for the multithreading task. 1.2 Area for captured pieces (1 point) The GUI has to include an area to display the captured pieces. 1.3 History list (1 point) The GUI has to include a history list that shows the moves of both players. These moves have to be represented in the algebraic notation. Note: Take a look at the link provided in assignment1.pdf to check the algebraic notation format. 1.4 Command buttons (1 point) The GUI has to include three buttons: Redo, Undo and Reset. 1.5 Menu item FileÆNew and Reset button (1 point) The FileÆNew command and the reset button have to set the board to the initial positions. I.e. to the standard starting position in chess. 1.6 Menu item FileÆLoad (1 point) This command displays an open-file dialog box for loading a Forsyth file. The program shall then calculate the next move of the black player and render the result on the board. Note: This command has the same purpose as the loading operation of the previous assignment. Instead of printing the result in a file, you have to render it on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Stay of Discovery
    Case 2:18-cv-00907-KOB Document 28 Filed 11/02/18 Page 1 of 5 FILED 2018 Nov-02 PM 04:12 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LAKEISHA CHESTNUT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00907-KOB ) JOHN H. MERRILL, ) ) Defendant, ) ) DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF STATE’S (OPPOSED) MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY Defendant, Secretary of State John H. Merrill, respectfully requests a stay of all parties’ discovery obligations until the Court resolves the validity of Plaintiffs’ complaint. Secretary Merrill has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings arguing that Plaintiffs’ claims should be dismissed because jurisdiction lies with a three-judge court, because Plaintiffs have failed to plead facts demonstrating a proper remedy, and because Plaintiffs claims are barred by laches. When such a motion is pending, Circuit law compels a stay to guard against the “significant costs” of unwarranted discovery requests. Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d 1353, 1367 (11th Cir. 1997). Counsel for Defendant have consulted with counsel for the Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs oppose this motion. Case 2:18-cv-00907-KOB Document 28 Filed 11/02/18 Page 2 of 5 I. Background Eight years after the last census and two years before the next one, Plaintiffs brought this action claiming that Alabama must re-draw its seven congressional districts to include a second majority-black district. See doc. 1. Secretary Merrill moved to dismiss when Plaintiffs failed to allege that they would reside in a re- configured majority-black district, see doc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Awards Program
    American Horse Publications 2015 Annual Awards Competition for material published in and dated 2014 AWARDS BANQUET & PRESENTATIONS San Antonio, Texas JUNE 20, 2015 2 2015 AWARD DIVISIONS EDITORIAL CONTENT (PRINT AND ONLINE) .......................... 3 MULTIMEDIA ............................................................................ 13 PHOTOGRAPHY & ILLUSTRATION (PRINT AND ONLINE) ... 15 ADVERTISING ............................................................................ 17 COVER & EDITORIAL DESIGN.................................................. 18 VALIANT HUMAN-ANIMAL BOND AWARD .......................... 21 SPECIALTY CLASSES ................................................................. 22 ALLTECH A+ EQUINE JOURNALISM AWARD ........................ 23 GENERAL EXCELLENCE ............................................................. 24 OVERALL PUBLICATION AWARD ............................................ 25 BUSINESS DIVISION ................................................................. 26 2015 JUDGES ............................................................................. 28 3 EDITORIAL CONTENT NEWS REPORTING SINGLE ARTICLE INSTRUCTIONAL SINGLE ARTICLE CIRCULATION/AUV 22 entries UNDER 20,000 8 entries 1st Daily Racing Form 1st Indiana Vet Case Draws Scrutiny, Debate Paint Horse Journal By Matt Hegarty E-fficiency November 11, 2014 By Megan Brincks This story is well-sourced, well-reported and well-written. September 2014 The reporter does a wonderful job laying out a complex This article made me want to get a
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in Jeopardy
    RWANDA JUSTICE IN JEOPARDY THE FIRST INSTANCE TRIAL OF VICTOIRE INGABIRE Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2013 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2013 Index: AFR 47/001/2013 English Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Victoire Ingabire at the High Court of Kigali, Rwanda, November 2011. © STEVE TERRILL/AFP/Getty Images amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. Acronyms.................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Derby, Flamingo Stakes, Florida Derby, Blue Grass Stakes, Preakness, Queen’S Plate 3RD Belmont Stakes
    Northern Dancer 90th May 2, 1964 THE WINNER’S PEDIGREE AND CAREER HIGHLIGHTS Pharos Nearco Nogara Nearctic *Lady Angela Hyperion NORTHERN DANCER Sister Sarah Polynesian Bay Colt Native Dancer Geisha Natalma Almahmoud *Mahmoud Arbitrator YEAR AGE STS. 1ST 2ND 3RD EARNINGS 1963 2 9 7 2 0 $ 90,635 1964 3 9 7 0 2 $490,012 TOTALS 18 14 2 2 $580,647 At 2 Years WON Summer Stakes, Coronation Futurity, Carleton Stakes, Remsen Stakes 2ND Vandal Stakes, Cup and Saucer Stakes At 3 Years WON Kentucky Derby, Flamingo Stakes, Florida Derby, Blue Grass Stakes, Preakness, Queen’s Plate 3RD Belmont Stakes Horse Eq. Wt. PP 1/4 1/2 3/4 MILE STR. FIN. Jockey Owner Odds To $1 Northern Dancer b 126 7 7 2-1/2 6 hd 6 2 1 hd 1 2 1 nk W. Hartack Windfields Farm 3.40 Hill Rise 126 11 6 1-1/2 7 2-1/2 8 hd 4 hd 2 1-1/2 2 3-1/4 W. Shoemaker El Peco Ranch 1.40 The Scoundrel b 126 6 3 1/2 4 hd 3 1 2 1 3 2 3 no M. Ycaza R. C. Ellsworth 6.00 Roman Brother 126 12 9 2 9 1/2 9 2 6 2 4 1/2 4 nk W. Chambers Harbor View Farm 30.60 Quadrangle b 126 2 5 1 5 1-1/2 4 hd 5 1-1/2 5 1 5 3 R. Ussery Rokeby Stables 5.30 Mr. Brick 126 1 2 3 1 1/2 1 1/2 3 1 6 3 6 3/4 I.
    [Show full text]
  • MISCARRIAGES of JUSTICE ORIGINATING from DISCLOSURE DEFICIENCIES in CRIMINAL CASES A. Disclosure Failures As Ground for Retria
    CHAPTER FOUR MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE ORIGINATING FROM DISCLOSURE DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL CASES A. Disclosure Failures as Ground for Retrials: Common Law Standards and Examples This chapter will delve more deeply into one of the most fundamental causes of miscarriages of justice in (international) criminal cases, namely failure on the part of police and/or prosecution to timely, adequately and fairly disclose potentially exculpatory evidence to the judge, juries, and defense. The U.S. National Registry of Exonerations (NRE) which keeps count of exonerations in the U.S. from 1989 onwards, does not – in its offi- cial counting – include cases of group exonerations due to police and prosecutorial misconduct. In its June 2012-report the NRE counted 901 exonerations, the number has risen to 1,000 exonerations only five months later.1 The report discusses cases of at least 1,100 defendants who were exonerated in the so-called “group exonerations”. These exonerations were the consequence of the revelation of gross police misconduct in twelve cases since 1995 in which innocent defendants had been framed by police officers for mostly drug and gun crimes.2 Yet, most of the group exonera- tions were spotted accidently, as the cases are obscure and for some of the scandals the number of exonerees could only be estimated; these num- bers are not included in the 1,000 exonerations the registry counted on 30 October 2012.3 In many cases it will be hard to establish that police or prosecutorial misconduct did in fact occur; a conclusion that was also drawn by the NRE. This chapter will delve into cases where misconduct did come to light while analyzing the criminal law proceedings which led to these errors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Presumption of Innocence
    Texas Law Review See Also Volume 94 Response The Myth of the Presumption of Innocence Brandon L. Garrett* I. Introduction Do we have a presumption of innocence in this country? Of course we do. After all, we instruct criminal juries on it, often during jury selection, and then at the outset of the case and during final instructions before deliberations. Take this example, delivered by a judge at a criminal trial in Illinois: "Under the law, the Defendant is presumed to be innocent of the charges against him. This presumption remains with the Defendant throughout the case and is not overcome until in your deliberations you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant is guilty."' Perhaps the presumption also reflects something more even, a larger commitment enshrined in a range of due process and other constitutional rulings designed to protect against wrongful convictions. The defense lawyer in the same trial quoted above said in his closings: [A]s [the defendant] sits here right now, he is presumed innocent of these charges. That is the corner stone of our system of justice. The best system in the world. That is a presumption that remains with him unless and until the State can prove him guilty beyond2 a reasonable doubt. That's the lynchpin in the system ofjustice. Our constitutional criminal procedure is animated by that commitment, * Justice Thurgood Marshall Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law. 1. Transcript of Record at 13, People v. Gonzalez, No. 94 CF 1365 (Ill.Cir. Ct. June 12, 1995). 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure Dallin H
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. Reprinted for private circulation from THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW Vol. 37, No.4, Summer 1970 Copyright 1970 by the University of Chicago l'RINTED IN U .soA. Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure Dallin H. OakS;- The exclusionary rule makes evidence inadmissible in court if law enforcement officers obtained it by means forbidden by the Constitu­ tion, by statute or by court rules. The United States Supreme Court currently enforces an exclusionary rule in state and federal criminal, proceedings as to four major types of violations: searches and seizures that violate the fourth amendment, confessions obtained in violation of the fifth and' sixth amendments, identification testimony obtained in violation of these amendments, and evidence obtained by methods so shocking that its use would violate the due process clause.1 The ex­ clusionary rule is the Supreme Court's sole technique for enforcing t Professor of Law, The University of Chicago; Executive Director-Designate, The American Bar Foundation. This study was financed by a three-month grant from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration of the United States Department of Justice. The fact that the National Institute fur­ nished financial support to this study does not necessarily indicate the concurrence of the Institute in the statements or conclusions in this article_ Many individuals assisted the author in this study. Colleagues Hans Zeisel and Franklin Zimring gave valuable guidance on analysis, methodology and presentation. Colleagues Walter J.
    [Show full text]