DOCSLIB.ORG

Nationalism, Independence and the Middle East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nationalism, Independence and the Middle East 1 Colonialism, Independence and the Middle East Intervention, Transformation, Independence MES 20 Reflections on the Middle East Prof. Hesham Issa Mohammed Abdelaal History and Conflicts 2 In this Session Colonialism ! 1.Defining Colonialism in the Middle East ! 2.Mandating, Administration and Colonialism! 3.Timeline of colonialism in the Middle east! 4.The United states and the Middle East " Independence movements ! 5.The Independence of the State of Israel. ! 6.The Independence of the State of Egypt! 7.The Independence of the state of Syria ! 8.The Independence of the TransJordan Kingdom ! 9.The Independence of Iran 3 Group Discussion Issues 1.Time Line of the Middle east from 1860-1960 ! • 1860 to WWI ! • WWI to WWII ! • WWII to 1960 " ! 2.Mandating, Administration and Colonialism! • Ottoman ! • European ! • United States " ! 3. Independence movements ! • Unity Of Faith! • Unity of Language ! • Unity of ethnicity ! • Identity Construction S05-1 .key - October 8, 2014 4 Foreign Office Which of the following is NOT true about the Balfour November 2nd, 1917 Declaration?! ! A.It agreed to a national home for Jewish people" !Dear Lord Rothschild, B.It declared protection for civil and religious rights of I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine" declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved C.It declared protection for rights and political status by, the Cabinet. enjoyed by Jews in any other country.! ! ! "His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for D.It promised the Jews access to their Holy sites in " Jerusalem" the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious E.It was written after the Sykes-Picot Agreement! rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by !Jews in any other country." 5 ! In the Hussein-McMahon correspondence, which of the following was true? 1. Great Britain is prepared to recognise and support the independence of the Arabs in all the regions within the limits demanded by the Sherif of Mecca. 2. Great Britain will guarantee the Holy Places against all external aggression and will recognise A.Britain agreed to a future Arab state according to the specifications Hussein wanted" their inviolability. 3. When the situation admits, Great Britain will give to the Arabs her advice and will assist them to B.Arabs promised they would revolt against the Ottoman establish what may appear to be the most suitable forms of government in those various Empire" territories. C.Britain promised to guarantee all Holy Places would be 4. On the other hand, it is understood that the Arabs have decided to seek the advice and protected from external aggression" guidance of Great Britain only, and that such European advisers and officials as may be required for the formation of a sound form of administration will be British. D.Arabs claimed all Muslims were acting as one! 5. With regard to the vilayets of Bagdad and Basra, the Arabs will recognise that the established position and interests of Great Britain necessitate special administrative arrangements in order to secure these territories from foreign aggression, to promote the welfare of the local populations Why European Imperialism interests in Middle East? 6 Results of Colonialism Location - Suez Canal- Ottoman Empire- Natural Resources • Creation of new, national states in place of the Ottoman Empire (Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Turkey, etc.) ■ Religions: " • Implanting of western-supported regimes (especially monarchies) that use Judaism, Islam, Christianity" violence to maintain authority. In many cases, these would later be violently ■ Ethnic and Languages: " overthrown. Arab, Turks, Persian, Jews, • Centralization of political power. Loss of rural autonomy. Kurdish, Armenian" • Reorganization of social relationships among different groups. Privileging of ■ Borders: " some religious and social groups over others, leading to future conflict. created by European nations without thought to ethnic • Massive economic disruption. New economic relationships, with arrangements makeup of the region Gerome’s Napoleon in Egypt particularly benefiting western powers (1863) • New models: nationalism, “modernity vs traditional” Mandeism They are often called the Christians of Saint John, 6 S05-1 .key - October 8, 2014 Middle East in 1914 7 Ottoman reform: 1830s-1870s Results • New centralization • New technologies (railroad) • New education Ottoman reform: 1830s-1870s Results • New centralization • New technologies (railroad) • New institutions • New education • New institutions • Erosion of Ottoman economic • Erosion of Ottoman economic and political independence and political independence • Capitulations • Capitulations • European protection of non- Muslim minorities • Nationalism • European protection of non-Muslim minorities • loss of Ottoman territories in Europe • Nationalism • Turkish and Arab nationalism • loss of Ottoman territories in Europe • Turkish and Arab nationalism 8 The era of “New Imperialism” 1880’s -1900’s The Age of Empire, 1875-1914 • During this time period European governments scrambled frantically for territory in Africa and strived for trade domination in China, Egypt, the Ottoman Empire and India. • The causes of New Imperialism differed from those of the first explorers, new land and missionary work, and focused mostly on economic expansion, political empire building, military expansion, and the racist belief in European superiority. • Some greatly criticized imperialism as a betrayal of Western ideals of freedom and equality; others realized that in order to maintain the balance of Europe the major players of imperialism must create new legislation to divide territories or open trade markets fairly. 8 • This divide and control attitude created dire consequences for the indigenous Sykes-Picot Agreement 9 ARTICLE 22 OF THE COVENANT OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS !June 28, 1919 1.To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have Direct french Control Under French Influence ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them Direct British Control and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the Under British Influence principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred Direct french Control trust of civilization and that securities for the performance of this trust should be !embodied in this Covenant. 2. The best method of giving practical effect to this principle is that the tutelage 9 of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their S05-1 .key - October 8, 2014 10 Outside the Mandate ■ True independence: Turkey! ■ Mostly independent: Yemen, S. Arabia! ■ External control & influence: Iran (Britain, Russia, U.S.), Egypt (Britain)! ■ British treaties of protection: Kuwait, Oman, U.A.E. 10 Rebellions under colonialism 11 • Certain parts of the world put under “trusteeship” of various victorious European powers •British mandates in the MidEast: Palestine, Iraq, Transjordan •French mandates in the MidEast: Syria, Lebanon •Mandates both sanctify western colonialism but also circumscribe it 12 • In 1918 Faysal Ibn Husayn occupied Damascus and raised the Arab Syria !flag to widespread popular support. • The Arab Independence Party convened a general congress to organise !elections. • The Syrian National Congress met in March 1920 and called for independence. COVENANT OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS ! • French opposed and invaded Syria in July 1920. Syria 1918 S05-1 .key - October 8, 2014 French Divide and Rule 13 • In 1920 the French divided its Syrian territory into two separate states: !Damascus and Aleppo. • In 1922 two further states were created: the Alawite State and Jabal !Druze. • In 1924, Damascus and Aleppo were re-united to form the new State of !Syria. • Also in 1920 Great Lebanon was created, ostensibly to protect the !Maronite community. 14 • Transjordan and Iraq did not exist as political or geographical entities prior to the end of World War One •Faysal installed as monarch of Iraq •Transjordan created to reward the Hashemites. Abdallah installed as king of the new state. •Depended almost entirely on British patronage. Jordan & Palestine 1923 Jordan •Amman, the new capital, only had between 2500 – 5000 residents 15 Britain Creates Trans-Jordan • Winston Churchill split off all Palestine east of the Jordan and gave it to Hashemites • ¾ of Jewish homeland • Now known as Trans-Jordan now Jordan • Churchill sympathetic to Zionist goals • Britain - little to develop Jewish homeland S05-1 .key - October 8, 2014 16 Independence ■ Independence was gained in the following years:! • 1923 – Trans-Jordan from Britain • 1930 - Iraq gained freedom from British; borders gave limited access to Persian Gulf and religious and ethnic tensions prevailed • 1936 - Egypt independence from Britain, but military control of the Suez Canal for Britain for 20 years • Lebanon, Syria, Jordan gained independence after World War II 16 17 Full Independence: How and When ■ Military Revolution (Coup): Egypt (1952), Iraq (1958) ■ War: Turkey (1920-1923), Israel (1948) ■ Uprising and Int. Agreement: Syria, Lebanon (after WWII) ■ Treaty: Jordan (1946/8) ■ Communities promised states/autonomy that did not receive them: Palestinians, Kurds, Armenians 17 S05-1 .key - October 8, 2014.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Squaring the Circles in Syria's North East
    Squaring the Circles in Syria’s North East Middle East Report N°204 | 31 July 2019 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Search for Middle Ground ......................................................................................... 3 A. The U.S.: Caught between Turkey and the YPG ........................................................ 3 1. Turkey: The alienated ally .................................................................................... 4 2. “Safe zone” or dead end? The buffer debate ........................................................ 8 B. Moscow’s Missed Opportunity? ................................................................................. 11 C. The YPG and Damascus: Playing for Time ................................................................ 13 III. A War of Attrition with ISIS Remnants ........................................................................... 16 A. The SDF’s Approach to ISIS Detainees ..................................................................... 16 B. Deteriorating Relations between the SDF and Local Tribes ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Istiqlalis in Transjordan, 1920-1926 by Ghazi
    A Divided Camp: The Istiqlalis in Transjordan, 1920-1926 by Ghazi Jarrar Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2016 © Copyright by Ghazi Jarrar, 2016 Table of Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................v Chapter One: Introduction.................................................................................................................1 Background.....................................................................................................................................3 Historiography...........................................................................................................................11 Project Parameters and Outline..........................................................................................26 A Note on Sources.....................................................................................................................29 Chapter Two: The Militant Istiqlalis...........................................................................................31 Background..................................................................................................................................32 The Militant Istiqlalis: Part
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Legacies in Syrian Nationality Law and the Risk of Statelessness
    COLONIAL LEGACIES IN SYRIAN NATIONALITY LAW AND THE RISK OF STATELESSNESS MALAK BENSLAMA-DABDOUB* The millions of Syrians born or living in exile as a result of the ongoing conflict has dramatically increased the number of people from Syria with no nationality. In this regard, Syrian nationality law has been criticised for containing discriminatory provisions and failing to address the risk of statelessness. Nonetheless, the responsibility of colonialism in creating such discrimination has been largely overlooked. One decade after the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War, this article looks back at the colonial roots of Syrian legislation governing nationality. Through a critical legal and historical analysis, it reveals the hidden colonial legacies of Syrian citizenship, by highlighting the responsibility of European colonial powers in introducing gender-based discrimination in domestic legislation, rendering Kurds and Palestinians stateless, and creating the practice of arbitrary denationalisation. This paper ends with a call for more research on colonial legacies within citizenship and statelessness studies. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................... 6 Historical Context: European Colonialism and the Formation of Syria as a Modern State ........................................................................................................... 11 A The Dislocation of the Ottoman Empire and Creation of Artificial Nationalities ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal for Strategic Studies and International Relations
    Journal for Strategic Studies and International Relations Issue 1 6/2011 ▪ The Islamic Umma – their duties ▪ Contemporary History of some Countries in the Middle East ▪ Revolution and Freedom in the Arab World - and then? ▪ Analysis of improvement possibilities in the Middle East region ▪ Foundations of Western World – Social and Political Aspects ▪ Western World – Islamic World Relationship ▪ Basic principles in the relationship between the Muslim World and other people and cultures • Institute for Strategic 1 Studies and International Relations (ISSIR) • • Institute for Strategic Studies and International Relations (ISSIR) • • Karlsruhe/Germany – Ras Nhache/Lebanon • www.aecenar.com/institutes/issir Postal Address ISSIR Karlsruhe ISSIR Ras Nhache !# $ !"# – – Haid-und-Neu-Str.7, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany !# – %&' Tel. 0049 (0)721 9658 567 Tel./Fax. 00961 (0)6 921318 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Issue 1 (English Edition) June 2011 ISSIR is a Member Institute of This Edition was in Cooperation with Editorial Board Editor: Samir Mourad, AECENAR and DIdI Authors: Samir Mourad, AECENAR and DIdI Dr. iur. Jasmin Pacic, DIdI Translators: Silvia Latifa Tertag, DIdI Moryam Heike Islam, DIdI Cover Design: Grit Amaly Hoffmann, DIdI 2 Content 1 The Islamic Umma – their duties ............................................................................................... 5 1.1 Building an Islamic society................................................................................................ 5 1.1.1 Propagation
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Response to the Syrian Invasion of Lebanon in 1976. Bjarte Bjørsvik
    The Soviet response to the Syrian invasion of Lebanon in 1976. Bjarte Bjørsvik HIS 350 Master thesis Department for Archaeology, History, Cultural studies and Religion University of Bergen 2018 Title page photos: Upper photo: Syrian President Hafez al-Assad and Secretary General of the Soviet Communist Party Leonid Brezhnev.1 Lower photo: President Hafez al-Assad and PLO leader Yasser Arafat.2 1 Holtland, Jenne Jan, «Hafiz al-Assad & Brezhnev. Plus ca change, plus c'est la même chose». 2 Cohen, David. «Emergence of Palestinian Identity». ii Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................vi Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Research question ............................................................................................................................... 2 Limitation of time, actors and themes ................................................................................................ 2 Why is this topic important? ............................................................................................................... 3 Method: Sources and the use of sources ............................................................................................. 5 Theory: What kind
    [Show full text]
  • No. 225/13 December 2017
    Syrian Crisis United Nations Response A Weekly Update from the UN Department of Public Information No. 225/13 December 2017 UN and partners launch humanitarian appeal to help five million Syrian refugees UN agencies and partners launched on 12 December a USD 4.4 billion humanitarian appeal to support more than 5 million Syrian refugees and communities hosting them in neighboring countries. Speaking to reporters in Geneva, UN Refugee agency (UNHCR), Bureau Director for the Middle East and North Africa Amin Awad said that the crisis in Syria had forced 5.3 million people to flee the country and displaced a further 7 million. In addition, more than 500,000 people had been killed and another 10 million had been cut off from services and were in need of aid. The 2018 Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan for Syria, is designed to support Syrian refugees in Turkey, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon and Egypt, http://www.unhcr.org/en-us/news/briefing/2017/12/5a2ffd534/un-partners-launch-plan- support-five-million-syrian-refugees-countries.html Intra-Syrian talks proceed as Government delegation returns to Geneva As the Intra-Syrian talks continued for a second week in Geneva, Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq said during a press briefing at Headquarters on 11 December that Special Envoy Staffan de Mistura held separate meetings that day with the Government delegation and the Syrian National Congress delegation. http://www.un.org/press/en/2017/db171211.doc.htm WHO and Handicap International call attention to needs of Syrians with disabilities An estimated 30,000 people are injured in Syria every month and more than six years into the conflict, an estimated 1.5 million people have been injured.
    [Show full text]
  • Envisioning Turco-Arab Co-Existence Between Empire and Nationalism
    WDI1570-060710.1163/15700607-00600A17versionfulltext Die Welt des IslamsInternationalArticle Journal for the Study of Mod- ern IslamWelt Islams0043-25391570-0607BrillLeiden | Boston Die Welt des Islams 61 (2021) 72-112 202001January202106120210172112CopyrightAlp Yenen 2020 by alp yenen. Envisioning Turco-Arab Co-Existence between Empire and Nationalism Alp Yenen Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract The idea of a continued Turco-Arab co-existence under the Ottoman Sultanate might appear counterfactual or marginal – if not nostalgic – from the sober vantage of knowing “the end of history”. The Ottoman Empire neither survived the Great War nor made way for a multinational co-existence of Turks and Arabs. For contemporaries, however, different models of federalism and multinationalism offered solutions to save the Ottoman Empire and safeguard Turco-Arab co-existence. While the federalist ideas of Ottoman Arabs are far better known in the academic literature, in regards to Ottoman Turks, the commonplace interpretations follow the teleology of the Turkish nation-state formation. In order to correct this misperception, I will illustrate the existence of corresponding Turkish voices and visions of federalism and multinationalism. Envisioning Turco-Arab co-existence was a serious feature of policy debates, especially in the years of crisis from the Balkan Wars to the settlement of post- Ottoman nation-states in the aftermath of the First World War. Keywords Arabism – Turkism – Ottomanism – Federalism – Decentralism – Young Turks Introduction1 “My friend, this country can only survive like the Austro-Hungarian Em pire.”2 1 This article was written independently from Adam Mestyan’s forthcoming article “Austria-Hungary in Ottoman Arabic Political Thought: Ottoman Dualism, Imperial Comparison, and Ancillary History, 1867-1914”.
    [Show full text]
  • 31295015500902.Pdf (6.441Mb)
    CONFLICT IN THE MIDDLE EAST: AN ANALYSIS by MOSES H. PERMAN, B.A. A THESIS IN GOVERNMENT Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Technological College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved August, 1968 Ti /Vo. /^i" Cop. ^ CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 3 II. STRUGGLE IN THE MIDDLE EAST SINCE 1948 34 The Arab Refugee 38 The Jordan River Controversy 46 The Arab Boycott III. BIG POWERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST 60 IV. PRESENT SITUATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST 95 A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 109 ii INTRODUCTION Since the 1920's, tension has been an ever present element in Je;vish-Arab relationships. As a result of the conflict existing between the two peoples, a situation has developed in the Middle East which is virtually intolerable to the international community. There is need for an analysis of the factors contributing to this situation. To accomplish this analysis, it was necessary to examine, in detail, the nature of the Arab-Israeli disputes that have caused three wars in the past twenty years, and the relation that big powers have had to the conflict. In Chapter I, the role of big powers in the creation of the Arab-Israeli disputes is introduced. In offering conflicting promises of Palestinian territory, Great Britain laid the groundwork for much of the conflict that was to follow. As a result of the situation created externally, the two peoples went to war. After the war of 1943 failed to achieve any solutions, the conflict grew increasingly real, and between 1948 and 1957» various manifestations of the increasing tension became clear.
    [Show full text]
  • IN THIS ISSUE: Briefs
    VOLUME X, ISSUE 11 uJUNE 1, 2012 IN THIS ISSUE: BRIEFS................................................................................................................................1 Tripoli’s ISLAMIST MILITIA LEADER TURNS TO POLITICS IN THE NEW LIBYA By Camille Tawil .......................................................................................................4 COMMUNIST INSURGENCY RAMPS UP AS MANILA REACHES SETTLEMENT WITH MUSLIM MILITANTS By Jacob Zenn ...........................................................................................................7 Abd al-Hakim Belhadj SYRIAN TRIBAL NETWORKS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SYRIAN UPRISING By Carole A. O’Leary and Nicholas A. Heras............................................................9 Terrorism Monitor is a publication of The Jamestown Foundation. The Terrorism Monitor is designed to be read by policy- makers and other specialists AL-QAEDA CELL ON TRIAL AS ETHIOPIA BECOMES A RELIGIOUS yet be accessible to the general public. The opinions expressed BATTLEGROUND within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily Ten Somalis and one Kenyan are currently under trial in Addis Ababa for their reflect those of The Jamestown alleged involvement in an al-Qaeda bombing plot after weapons and training Foundation. manuals were seized in the Bale region of southeastern Ethiopia last December. The Kenyan, Hassan Jarsoo, has admitted his role in the alleged plot, but Unauthorized reproduction or the others, who allegedly include several members of the army of Somalia’s redistribution of this or any Transitional Federal Government, have denied their involvement. Six of the Jamestown publication is strictly defendants are being tried in absentia (Walta Info Online [Addis Ababa], May prohibited by law. 20; Africa Review [Nairobi], May 22; AFP, May 18). Ethiopia is one of the earliest homes of both Christianity and Islam, with its 85 million people being roughly 60 percent Christian and 30 percent Muslim.
    [Show full text]
  • François Massoulié: Middle East Conflicts Study Guide
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government 2003 François Massoulié: Middle East Conflicts Study Guide Steven Alan Samson Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Samson, Steven Alan, "François Massoulié: Middle East Conflicts Study Guide" (2003). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 167. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/167 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FRANÇOIS MASSOULIÉ: MIDDLE EAST CONFLICTS STUDY GUIDE, 2003 Steven Alan Samson CHAPTER ONE: THE HERITAGE OF THE PAST Background 1. The three areas of Middle East settlement were Egypt (stable, orderly, unitary civilization with three successive, long-lived pharaonic kingdoms), Fertile Crescent (Mesopotamia: unstable, rapid rise and decline of kingdoms and empires), and the Arabian peninsula (nomadic and tribal Bedouins of the interior vs. the coastal harbors and marketplaces). 2. The Arabia peninsula (a subcontinent with over a million square miles) is a continuation of the Sahara desert, just as the Red Sea is a continuation of the east African rift valleys. It is a great plateau that rises to 12,000 feet within 30 miles of the Red Sea. Its interior is barren, hot (with cold nights), dry, and studded with occasional grassy oases.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstructing Syria Towards a Regionalized Strategy for a Confederal Country
    Deconstructing Syria Towards a regionalized strategy for a confederal country Michael O’Hanlon Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence June 2015 Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence, and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment, and the analysis and recommendations of the Institutions’ scholars are not determined by any donation. The Brookings Institution is a private, non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings research are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the view of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Cover photo courtesy of Freedom House Flickr, “Syrian rebel army patrol an area near homs,” https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode. CENTER FOR 21ST CENTURY SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE 1 INTRODUCTION U.S. policy towards Syria since the Arab spring uprisings of 2011 has been a litany of miscalculation, frustration, and tragedy for the people of that ill-fated land. The ascendance of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) as the major element of the opposition to the Bashar al-Assad regime may not amount to an imminent threat to American security; indeed, very few Americans have died to date at the hands of ISIL or affiliates. But ISIL’s rise does place at much greater risk the security of Iraq, the future of Syria itself, and the stability of Lebanon and Jordan.1 It could jeopardize the safety of American citizens as well, given the possibility of attacks by “lone wolves” inspired in their western home by ISIL propaganda, or by westerners returning from the Syrian jihad to carry out attacks at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. the Making of the Modern Middle East
    THE MAKING OF THE 1 MODERN MIDDLE EAST Michael Gasper he Modern Middle East emerged out of a variety of social, cultural, and Tpolitical transformations. The degree of changes differed from place to place, but they left distinct historical experiences, social structures, cultural norms, and political tensions in common across the region we call “the Middle East.” The early experiences of the region, combined with its nineteenth- and twentieth-century encounters with the West—that led the region to be labeled the Middle East—createddistribute a sense of identification across the region. Elements of this common identity date back to the spread of Islam in the seventh cen- tury CE. Islam spread remarkably quickly in the early period, establishingor large empires, converting populations to Islam, and spreading Arabic language and culture.1 The Abbasid, Umayyad, and later the Ottoman, Safavid, and Qajar empires extended across a vast ter- ritory, stretching from North Africa to the Gulf. These empires established a memory of “greatness,” a time of Islamic empires that rivaled the West. By the eighteenth century, the two major political entities in the Middle East, the Ottoman Empire (centered in what is today the Republic of Turkey) and Safavid/Qajar Persia (centered in what is today the Islamicpost, Republic of Iran), enjoyed relative strength and security. The Ottoman Empire was a vast multiethnic, multilingual, and multireli- gious polity that at its peak stretched from central Europe all the way to Yemen and across North Africa to Morocco. It compared favorably with the expanse of the Roman Empire at its height.
    [Show full text]